1: \begin{abstract}

2: F. Gygi recently suggested an analytic, norm-conserving, regularized

3: nuclear potential to enable all-electron plane-wave calculations {[}J.

4: Chem. Theory Comput. 2023, 19, 1300--1309{]}. This potential $V(r)$

5: is determined by inverting the Schrödinger equation for the wave function

6: ansatz $\phi(\boldsymbol{r})=\exp[-h(\boldsymbol{r})]/\sqrt{\pi}$

7: with $h(\boldsymbol{r})=r\text{erf}(ar)+b\exp(-a^{2}r^{2})$, where

8: $a$ and $b$ are parameters. Gygi fixes $b$ by demanding $\phi$

9: to be normalized, the value $b(a)$ depending on the strength of the

10: regularization controlled by $a$. We begin this work by re-examining

11: the determination of $b(a)$ and find that the original 10-decimal

12: tabulations of Gygi are only correct to 5 decimals, leading to normalization

13: errors in the order of $10^{-10}$. In contrast, we show that a simple

14: 100-point radial quadrature scheme not only ensures at least 10 correct

15: decimals of $b$, but also leads to machine-precision level satisfaction

16: of the normalization condition.

17: 

18: Moreover, we extend Gygi's plane-wave study by examining the accuracy

19: of $V(r)$ with high-precision finite element calculations with Hartree--Fock

20: and LDA, GGA, and meta-GGA functionals on first- to fifth-period atoms.

21: We find that although the convergence of the total energy appears

22: slow in the regularization parameter $a$, orbital energies and shapes

23: are indeed reproduced accurately by the regularized potential even

24: with relatively small values of $a$, as compared to results obtained

25: with a point nucleus. The accuracy of the potential is furthermore

26: studied with $s$-$d$ excitation energies of Sc--Cu as well as ionization

27: potentials of He--Kr, which are found to converge to sub-meV precision

28: with $a=4$. The findings of this work are in full support of Gygi's

29: contribution, indicating that all-electron plane-wave calculations

30: can be accurately performed with the regularized nuclear potential.

31: \end{abstract}

32: