1: \begin{definition}\label{def:cdualparam} Suppose $\Gamma =

2:   (H,\gamma,R^+_{i\mathbb R})$ is a Langlands parameter (Theorem

3:   \ref{thm:LC}). The {\em $c$-Hermitian dual of $\Gamma$} is

4: \addtocounter{equation}{-1}

5: \begin{subequations}\label{se:cdualparam}

6: \begin{equation} \Gamma^{h,\sigma_c} =

7:   (H,-\overline\gamma\circ\theta,R^+_{i\mathbb R}).\end{equation}

8: This is the same as the Hermitian dual, except that we have twisted

9: the character by the Cartan involution $\theta$. Write $H=TA$ as in

10: \ref{prop:toruschars}, and  

11: \begin{equation}\Gamma = (\Lambda,\nu) = (\Lambda, \nu_{\text{re}} +

12: i\nu_{\im})\end{equation} 

13: as in \ref{def:dLP}, with $\Lambda$ a 

14: discrete Langlands parameter and $\nu \in {\mathfrak a}^*$.

15: Since $\theta$ acts by the identity on $T$ and by inversion on $A$,

16: comparison with Definition \ref{def:dualparam} shows that 

17: \begin{equation}\label{eq:cdualform}

18: \Gamma^{h,\sigma_c} = (\Lambda,\overline{\nu}) = (\Lambda,

19: \nu_{\re} - i\nu_{\im}).\end{equation}

20: In particular, {\em if the continuous parameter of $\Gamma$ is real

21:   (Definition \ref{def:dLP}) then $\Gamma^{h,\sigma_c}$ is equal to

22:   $\Gamma$.}  We will see (Proposition \ref{prop:cdualstd}) that this means

23: that the corresponding representation admits a $c$-invariant Hermitian

24: form. 

25: \end{subequations}

26: \end{definition}