1: \begin{abstract}

2: We consider the Random Walk Metropolis algorithm on $\mathbb{R}^n$

3: with Gaussian

4: proposals, and when the target probability measure is the $n$-fold

5: product of a one-dimensional law. It is well known (see

6: Roberts \textit{et al.}

7: (\textit{Ann. Appl. Probab.} \textbf{7} (1997) 110--120))

8: that, in the limit

9: $n \to\infty$, starting at equilibrium and for an appropriate scaling

10: of the variance and of the timescale as a function of the dimension

11: $n$, a

12: diffusive limit is obtained for each component of the Markov chain. In

13: Jourdain \textit{et al.}

14: (Optimal scaling for the transient phase of the random walk

15: Metropolis algorithm: The mean-field limit (2012) Preprint), we

16: generalize this result when the initial distribution

17: is not the

18: target probability measure. The obtained diffusive limit is the

19: solution to a stochastic differential equation nonlinear in the sense

20: of McKean. In the present paper, we prove convergence to equilibrium

21: for this equation. We discuss practical counterparts in order to

22: optimize the variance of the proposal distribution to accelerate

23: convergence to equilibrium. Our analysis confirms the interest of the

24: constant acceptance rate strategy (with acceptance rate between $1/4$

25: and $1/3$) first suggested in

26: Roberts \textit{et al.} (\textit{Ann. Appl. Probab.} \textbf{7} (1997) 110--120).

27: 

28: We also address scaling of the Metropolis-Adjusted Langevin

29: Algorithm. When starting at equilibrium, a diffusive limit for an

30: optimal scaling of the variance is

31: obtained in

32: Roberts and Rosenthal (\textit{J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol.} \textbf{60} (1998)

33: 255--268). In the transient case, we

34: obtain formally that the optimal variance scales very differently in

35: $n$ depending on the sign of a moment of the distribution, which

36: vanishes at equilibrium. This suggest that it is difficult to derive

37: practical recommendations for MALA from such asymptotic results.

38: \end{abstract}