1: \begin{abstract}
2:
3: \section*{Abstract}
4:
5: Current design constraints have encouraged the studies of
6: aeroacoustics fields around compressible jet flows. The
7: present work addresses the numerical study of subgrid scale modeling
8: for unsteady turbulent jet flows as a preliminary step for future aeroacoustic analyses
9: of main engine rocket plumes.
10: An in-house large eddy simulation (LES) tool is developed in order to
11: reproduce high fidelity results of compressible jet flows. In the present study,
12: perfectly expanded jets are considered because the authors want to emphasize the
13: effects of the jet mixing phenomena.
14: %which could be used for aeroacoustic studies with the Ffowcs Williams and
15: %Hawkings approach.
16: %The numerical solver is an upgrade of an existing Reynolds-averaged
17: %Navier-Stokes solver previously developed in the group. The
18: %original framework is rewritten in a modern fashion and
19: %intensive parallel computation capabilities have been added
20: %to the code.
21: The large eddy simulation formulation is written using the finite
22: difference approach, with an explicit time integration and using a
23: second order spatial discretization. The energy equation is carefully
24: discretized in order to model the energy equation of the filtered Navier-Stokes
25: formulation. The classical Smagorinsky model, the dynamic Smagorinsky
26: model and the Vreman models are the chosen subgrid scale closures
27: for the present work. Numerical simulations of perfectly expanded
28: jets are performed and compared with the literature in order to
29: validate and compare the performance of each subgrid closure in the
30: solver. %Moreover, speedup and the computational performance of the
31: %code are evaluated and discussed.
32: %Flow results are used for an initial evaluation of
33: %the noise radiated from the rocket plume.
34: % for a few exit pressure
35: %and temperature ratios.
36:
37: \end{abstract}
38: