f1e746d3a448fd8c.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: 
3: \section*{Abstract}
4: 
5: Current design constraints have encouraged the studies of 
6: aeroacoustics fields around compressible jet flows. The 
7: present work addresses the numerical study of subgrid scale modeling 
8: for unsteady turbulent jet flows as a preliminary step for future aeroacoustic analyses 
9: of main engine rocket plumes. 
10: An in-house large eddy simulation (LES) tool is developed in order to 
11: reproduce high fidelity results of compressible jet flows. In the present study, 
12: perfectly expanded jets are considered because the authors want to emphasize the 
13: effects of the jet mixing phenomena. 
14: %which could be used for aeroacoustic studies with the Ffowcs Williams and 
15: %Hawkings approach. 
16: %The numerical solver is an upgrade of an existing Reynolds-averaged 
17: %Navier-Stokes solver previously developed in the group. The 
18: %original framework is rewritten in a modern fashion and 
19: %intensive parallel computation capabilities have been added 
20: %to the code. 
21: The large eddy simulation formulation is written using the finite 
22: difference approach, with an explicit time integration and using a 
23: second order spatial discretization. The energy equation is carefully 
24: discretized in order to model the energy equation of the filtered Navier-Stokes 
25: formulation. The classical Smagorinsky model, the dynamic Smagorinsky 
26: model and the Vreman models are the chosen subgrid scale closures 
27: for the present work. Numerical simulations of perfectly expanded 
28: jets are performed and compared with the literature in order to 
29: validate and compare the performance of each subgrid closure in the 
30: solver. %Moreover, speedup and the computational performance of the 
31: %code are evaluated and discussed. 
32: %Flow results are used for an initial evaluation of 
33: %the noise radiated from the rocket plume.
34: % for a few exit pressure 
35: %and temperature ratios.
36: 
37: \end{abstract}
38: