f2c24dec0b566a06.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: Metal-insulator transitions and different ground-state phases 
3: in quasi-one-dimensional materials, ($R_1R_2$-DCNQI)$_2$M 
4: ($R_1$=$R_2$=CH$_3$, I and M=Ag, Cu), are studied with 
5: a renormalization-group method.
6: We use one-dimensional continuum models with backward 
7: scatterings, umklapp processes and couplings with 
8: 2$k_F$ and 4$k_F$ phonons (not static lattice distortion).
9: We take a quarter-filled band for M=Ag and a sixth-filled band 
10: coupled with a third-filled band for M=Cu.
11: Depending on electron-electron and electron-phonon coupling 
12: strengths, the ground-state phase becomes a Tomonaga-Luttinger 
13: liquid or a state with a gap(s).
14: For M=Ag, there appear 
15: a spin-gap state with a dominant 2$k_F$ charge-density-wave 
16: correlation, a Mott insulator with a dominant 4$k_F$ 
17: charge-density-wave correlation, or a spin-Peierls state with 
18: different magnitudes of spin and charge gaps.
19: Three-dimensionality is taken into account by cutting off 
20: the logarithmic singularity in either the particle-particle 
21: channel or the particle-hole channel.
22: The difference between the ground-state phase of 
23: the $R_1$=$R_2$=CH$_3$ salt (spin-Peierls state) and that of 
24: the $R_1$=$R_2$=I salt (antiferromagnetic state) is 
25: qualitatively explained by a difference in the cutoff energy 
26: in the particle-particle channel.
27: For M=Cu, there appear 
28: a Mott insulator with a charge density wave of period 3 and 
29: a Peierls insulator with a charge density wave of period 6.
30: The conditions for the experimentally observed, Mott insulator 
31: phase are strong correlation in the sixth-filled band, moderate 
32: electron-phonon couplings, and finite electron-4$k_F$ phonon 
33: coupling.
34: Resistance is calculated as a function of temperature with 
35: a memory-function approximation in both cases above.
36: It qualitatively reproduces the differences among the M=Ag and 
37: M=Cu cases as well as the $R_1$=$R_2$=CH$_3$ and $R_1$=$R_2$=I 
38: cases.
39: \end{abstract}