1: \begin{abstract}

2: The two-sample problem for Cronbach's coefficient $\alpha_C$, as an estimate of test or composite score reliability, has attracted little attention, 

3: compared to the extensive treatment of the one-sample case. It is necessary to compare the reliability of a test for different subgroups, for different tests or the short and long 

4:  forms of a test. In this paper, we study statistically how to compare two coefficients $\alpha_{C,1}$ and $\alpha_{C,2}$.

5: The null hypothesis of interest is $H_0 : \alpha_{C,1} = \alpha_{C,2}$, which we test against one-or two-sided alternatives. 

6: For this purpose, resampling-based permutation and bootstrap tests are proposed. 

7: These statistical tests ensure a better control of the type I error, in finite or very small sample sizes, when the state-of-affairs \textit{asymptotically distribution-free} (ADF) 

8: large-sample test may fail 

9: to properly attain the nominal significance level.

10: We introduce the permutation and bootstrap tests for the two-group multivariate non-normal models under the general ADF setting, thereby improving on the small sample properties of the well-known ADF asymptotic test.

11: By proper choice of a studentized test statistic, the resampling tests are modified such that they are still asymptotically valid, 

12: if the data may not be exchangeable. 

13: The usefulness of the proposed resampling-based testing strategies is demonstrated in an extensive simulation study and illustrated 

14: by real data applications.

15: 

16: \begin{keywords}

17: Bootstrap, Coefficient Alpha, Cronbach's Alpha, Non-Normality, Permutation, Reliability, Resampling-Based Inference

18: \end{keywords}

19: \end{abstract}\