1: \begin{abstract}

2: %

3: We consider the question of whether, and in what sense, Wardrop equilibria provide a good approximation for Nash equilibria in atomic unsplittable congestion games with a large number of small players.

4: We examine two different definitions of small players. In the first setting, we consider a sequence of games with an increasing number of players where each player's weight tends to zero. We prove that all (mixed) Nash equilibria of the finite games converge to the set of Wardrop equilibria of the corresponding nonatomic limit game. In the second setting, we consider again an increasing number of players but now each player has a unit weight and participates in the game with a probability tending to zero.

5: In this case, the Nash equilibria converge to the set of Wardrop equilibria of a different nonatomic game with suitably defined costs. 

6: The latter can also be seen as a Poisson game in the sense of \citet{Mye:IJGT1998}, establishing a precise connection between the Wardrop model and the empirical flows observed in real traffic networks that exhibit stochastic fluctuations well described by Poisson distributions.

7: In both settings we give explicit upper bounds on the rates of convergence, from which we also derive the convergence of the price of anarchy.

8: Beyond the case of congestion games, we establish a general result on the convergence of large games with random players towards Poisson games.

9: \end{abstract}

10: