1: \begin{proof}($\mathrm{Theorem \,4.1}$)
2: In the addition formula for the little $q$-Jacobi polynomials $p_n$,
3: replace $l$ by $l+m,$ $z$ by $z+m,$ $x$ by $q^{x+m}$ and $N$ by
4: $N+m$, we get addition formula for $p_{l+m}(q^{x+m};q^{\nu},1;q)$
5: \begin{align*}
6: &p_{l+m}(q^{x+m};q^{\nu},1;q)\widehat{K}_{z+m}(q^{x-N};t,N+m;q)\\&=\sum_{r=0}^{l+m}\sum_{s=0}^{r}(1-\delta_{rs})c_{l+m,l+m,r,s}^{(\nu)}(q)
7: (-1)^{r-s}t^{1/2(r+s)}q^{1/2(r-s)}q^{z(r+s)}\\&
8: \times
9: (q^{z+m},tq^{z+m};q^{-1})_{r-s}^{1/2}
10: (q^{N-z+1};q)_{r-s}^{1/2}
11: p_{l+m-r}(q^{z+m+s-r},q^{\nu+r+s},q^{r-s};q)\\&
12: \times
13: p_{l+m-r}(tq^{z+s+m-r},q^{\nu+r+s},q^{r-s};q)
14: p_{s}(q^{N-z},q^{\nu-1},q^{r-s};q)\widehat{K}_{z+m+s-r}(q^{x-N};t,N+m;q)\\&+\sum_{r=0}^{l+m}\sum_{s=0}^{r}c_{l+m,l+m,r,s}^{(\nu)}(q)
15: (-1)^{r-s}t^{1/2(r+s)}q^{1/2(r-s)}q^{r^2-s^2}q^{(z+m)(r+s)}\\&
16: \times(q^{z+m+1},tq^{z+m+1};q)_{r-s}^{1/2}
17: (q^{N-z};q^{-1})_{r-s}^{1/2}
18: p_{l+m-r}(q^{z+m},q^{\nu+r+s},q^{r-s};q) \\&
19: \times p_{l+m-r}(tq^{z+m},q^{\nu+r+s},q^{r-s};q)
20: p_{s}(q^{N-z+s-r},q^{\nu-1},q^{r-s};q)\widehat{K}_{z+m+r-s}(q^{x-N};t,N+m;q).
21: \end{align*}
22: As $m\rightarrow \infty$, the right-hand side and left-hand sides of
23: these formula tends to the right-hand side and left-hand side of the
24: addition formula for $q$-Bessel \eqref{41}. We give a rigorous
25: proof of these limits by using the dominated
26: convergence theorem.\\
27: From \eqref{cc1} and \eqref{cc2} there exists a positive constant $K$
28: such that
29: \begin{equation}
30: c_{l+m,l+m,r,s}^{(\nu)}(q)\sim
31: Kq^{-(l+m)(r+s)+s(s+r+1)}\, \, \, as\,\,\,
32: m\rightarrow\infty.
33: \end{equation}
34: Then by the use of proposition 3.2 and lemma 4-2, the summand in the
35: first sum of the second hand side of next formula is bounded in
36: absolute value by $Cq^{-l(r+s)+1/2s^2}$, where $C$ is positive
37: constant and independent of $s,r$. Similarly, the summand in the
38: second sum at the second hand side of next formula is bounded in
39: absolute value by $Cq^{-l(r+s)+1/2r^2}.$
40: \end{proof}