1: \begin{abstract}

2: The two properties of the radial mass distribution of a gravitational lens that are well-constrained by

3: Einstein rings are the Einstein radius

4: $R_E$ and $\xi_2 = R_E \alpha''(R_E)/(1-\kappa_E)$, where $\alpha''(R_E)$ and

5: $\kappa_E$ are the second derivative of the deflection profile and the convergence

6: at $R_E$.  However, if there is a tight mathematical relationship between the 

7: radial mass profile and the angular structure, as is true of ellipsoids, an Einstein 

8: ring can appear to strongly distinguish radial mass distributions with the same 

9: $\xi_2$. This problem is beautifully illustrated by the ellipsoidal models 

10: in \cite{Millon2019}.  When using Einstein rings to constrain the radial mass

11: distribution, the angular structure of the models must contain all the degrees

12: of freedom expected in nature (e.g., external shear, different ellipticities for the stars and the

13: dark matter, modest deviations from elliptical structure, modest twists of the

14: axes, modest ellipticity gradients, etc.) that work to decouple the radial and

15: angular structure of the gravity.  Models of Einstein rings with too few

16: angular degrees of freedom will lead to strongly biased likelihood

17: distinctions between radial mass distributions and very precise but inaccurate 

18: estimates of $H_0$ based on gravitational lens time delays.  

19: \end{abstract}

20: