1: \begin{abstract}

2: \noindent Let $X$ be the toric variety $(\P^1)^4$ associated with its four-dimensional polytope $\Delta$. Denote by $\ti{X}$ the resolution of the singular Fano $\du{X}$ variety associated with the dual polytope $\du{\Delta}$. Generically, anticanonical sections $Y$ of $X$ and anticanonical sections $\ti{Y}$ of $\ti{X}$ are mirror partners in the sense of Batyrev. Our main result is the following: the Hodge-theoretic mirror of the quotient $Z$ associated to a maximal admissible pair $(Y,G)$ in $X$ is not a quotient $\ti{Z}$ associated to an admissible pair in $\ti{X}$. Nevertheless, it is possible to construct a mirror orbifold for $Z$ by means of a quotient of a suitable $\ti{Y}$. Its crepant resolution is a Calabi-Yau threeefold with Hodge numbers $(8,4)$. Instead, if we start from a non-maximal admissible pair, in same cases, its mirror is the quotient associated to an admissible pair.

3: % if a quotient $Z$ of $Y$ has a mirror manifold $\ti{Z}$, then $\ti{Z}$ is not the quotient of a section $\ti{Y}$ by a finite group. Nevertheless, $(Z, \ti{Z})$ are mirror Calabi-Yau orbifolds. Surprisingly, taking a crepant resolution of $\ti{Z}$ yields a (Hodge-theoretic) mirror partner of a Calabi-Yau threefold that is not related to $X$!

4: \end{abstract}

5: