1: \begin{abstract}

2: One of the most salient spatio-temporal patterns in population

3: ecology is the synchronization of fluctuating local populations across

4: vast spatial extent. Synchronization of abundance has been widely

5: observed across a range of spatial scales in relation to rate of

6: dispersal among discrete populations.

7: However, the dependence of

8: synchrony on patterns of among-patch movement across

9: heterogeneous landscapes has been largely ignored.

10: Here we consider the duration of movement

11: between two predator-prey communities connected by weak dispersal, and

12: its effect on population synchrony. More specifically, we introduce

13: time delayed dispersal to incorporate the finite transmission time

14: between discrete populations across a continuous landscape. Reducing

15: the system to a phase model using weakly connected network theory, it

16: is found that the time delay is an important factor determining the

17: nature and stability of phase-locked states. Our

18: analysis predicts enhanced convergence to stable synchronous

19: fluctuations in general, and a decreased ability of systems to produce in-phase synchronization dynamics in the presence of delayed dispersal. These results

20: introduce delayed dispersal as a tool for understanding the importance of

21: dispersal time across a landscape matrix in affecting metacommunity dynamics. They further

22: highlight the importance of landscape and dispersal patterns for

23: predicting the onset of synchrony between weakly-coupled populations.

24: 

25: \keywords{Synchronization \and Phase model \and Dispersal \and Time delay }

26: % \PACS{PACS code1 \and PACS code2 \and more}

27: % \subclass{MSC code1 \and MSC code2 \and more}

28: \end{abstract}

29: