1: \begin{abstract} Many research works have successfully extended algorithms such

2:   as evolutionary algorithms, reinforcement agents and neural networks using

3:   ``opposition-based learning'' (OBL). Two types of the ``opposites'' have been

4:   defined in the literature, namely \textit{type-I} and \textit{type-II}. The

5:   former are linear in nature and applicable to the variable space, hence easy to

6:   calculate. On the other hand, type-II opposites capture the ``oppositeness'' in

7:   the output space. In fact, type-I opposites are considered a special case of

8:   type-II opposites where inputs and outputs have a linear relationship. However,

9:   in many real-world problems, inputs and outputs do in fact exhibit a nonlinear

10:   relationship. Therefore, type-II opposites are expected to be better in

11:   capturing the sense of ``opposition'' in terms of the input-output relation. In

12:   the absence of any knowledge about the problem at hand, there seems to be no

13:   intuitive way to calculate the type-II opposites. In this paper, we introduce an

14:   approach to learn type-II opposites from the given inputs and their outputs

15:   using the artificial neural networks (ANNs). We first perform \emph{opposition

16:     mining} on the sample data, and then use the mined data to learn the

17:   relationship between input $x$ and its opposite $\breve{x}$. We have validated

18:   our algorithm using various benchmark functions to compare it against an

19:   evolving fuzzy inference approach that has been recently introduced. The results

20:   show the better performance of a neural approach to learn the opposites. This

21:   will create new possibilities for integrating oppositional schemes within

22:   existing algorithms promising a potential increase in convergence speed and/or

23:   accuracy.

24: \end{abstract}

25: