1: \begin{abstract}

2: Physical observables, such as the scattering phase shifts and the binding energies,

3:  calculated from the non-local HAL QCD potential do not depend on the sink operators used to  define the  potential.  This is called the 

4:  scheme independence of the HAL QCD method.

5: In practical applications,  the derivative expansion of the non-local potential  is employed, so that 

6: physical observables may receive some scheme dependence  at given order of the expansion.

7: In this paper, we compare   the $I=2$ $\pi\pi$ scattering phase shifts obtained in   

8: the point-sink scheme (the standard scheme in the HAL QCD method) and 

9:  the smeared-sink scheme (the LapH smearing newly introduced in the HAL QCD method).

10: Although potentials in different schemes have different forms as expected, 

11: we find that, for reasonably small smearing size, the resultant scattering phase shifts agree with each other   

12:  if  the next-to-leading order (NLO) term is taken into account.

13:  We also find that the HAL QCD potential in the point-sink scheme has negligible NLO term for wide range of energies, which

14:  implies  a good convergence of the derivative expansion in this case, while  the potential in the smeared-sink scheme has non-negligible NLO contribution.

15: Implication of this observation to the future studies of resonance channels (such as the $I=0$ and $1$ $\pi\pi$ scatterings)

16: with smeared all-to-all propagators is briefly discussed.

17: %We have to  keep the smearing size reasonably small and,  if possible, include the NLO term of the potential in the analysis.   

18:  All computations in this paper have been  performed at the lattice spacing $a\simeq 0.12$ fm ($1/a \simeq 1.6$ GeV) 

19:  on a $16^3\times 32$ lattice with the pion mass  $m_\pi\simeq 870$ MeV.

20: \end{abstract}

21: