1: \begin{abstract}

2: Strong convergence rates for (temporal, spatial, and noise) numerical approximations 

3: of semilinear stochastic evolution equations (SEEs) with smooth and regular nonlinearities are well understood in 

4: the scientific literature. Weak convergence rates for numerical approximations of 

5: such SEEs have been investigated since about 11 years and are far away from being well 

6: understood: roughly speaking, no essentially sharp weak convergence rates are known 

7: for parabolic SEEs with nonlinear diffusion coefficient functions; see 

8: Remark~2.3 in [A.\ Debussche, Weak approximation of stochastic partial differential equations: the 

9: nonlinear case, Math.\ Comp.\ 80 (2011), no.\ 273, 89--117] for details. In this article

10: we solve the weak convergence problem emerged from Debussche's article in the case of

11: spectral Galerkin approximations and establish essentially sharp

12: weak convergence rates for spatial spectral Galerkin approximations of semilinear SEEs

13: with nonlinear diffusion coefficient functions. 

14: Our solution to the weak convergence problem 

15: % emerged from Debussche's paper 

16: does not

17: use Malliavin calculus.

18: Rather, key ingredients in our 

19: solution to the weak convergence problem emerged from Debussche's article 

20: are the use of appropriately modified versions of the spatial Galerkin approximation processes

21: and applications of a mild It\^{o} type formula 

22: for solutions and numerical approximations of semilinear SEEs. 

23: % 

24: % 

25: % 

26: This article solves the weak convergence problem emerged from 

27: Debussche's article merely in the case of spatial spectral Galerkin approximations

28: instead of other more complicated numerical approximations.

29: Our method of proof extends, however, to a number of other kind of spatial, temporal, and 

30: noise numerical approximations for semilinear SEEs.

31: \end{abstract}