1: \begin{abstract}

2: % % Intrinsic calibrations are essential for modern perception and navigation systems

3: % % deployed on autonomous robots \addd{to ensure the obtained measurements are meaningful

4: % % and valid.} 

5: % Sensor calibration, which can be intrinsic or extrinsic, is an essential step to

6: % achieve the measurement accuracy required for modern perception and navigation

7: % systems deployed on autonomous robots. Intrinsic calibration models for

8: % spinning LiDARs have been based on hypothesized physical mechanisms,

9: % resulting in anywhere from three to ten parameters to be estimated from data, while

10: % no phenomenological models have yet been proposed for solid-state LiDARs. Instead of

11: % going down that road, we propose to abstract away from the physics of a LiDAR type (spinning vs. solid-state, for example) and focus on the point cloud's spatial geometry generated by the sensor. By modeling the calibration parameters as an

12: % element of a matrix Lie Group, we achieve a unifying view of calibration for

13: % different types of LiDARs. We further prove mathematically that the proposed model is

14: % well-constrained (has a unique answer) given four appropriately orientated

15: % targets. The proof provides a guideline for target positioning in the form of a

16: % tetrahedron. Moreover, an existing semi-definite programming global solver for SE(3) can be modified to efficiently compute the optimal calibration parameters. For solid-state LiDARs, we illustrate how the method works in simulation. For

17: % spinning LiDARs, we show with experimental data that the proposed matrix Lie Group

18: % model performs equally well as physics-based models in terms of reducing the point-to-plane 

19: % distance while being more robust to noise.

20: % \end{abstract}

21: