1: \begin{abstract}

2: Stimulated by the renewed observation of $D_{s0}^{*}(2317)$ signal and its updated mass

3: value $2318.3\pm1.2\pm1.2~\mbox{MeV}/c^{2}$ in the

4: process $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow D_{s}^{*+}D_{s0}^{*}(2317)^{-}+c.c.$ by BESIII Collaboration, we devote

5: to reinvestigate $D_{s0}^{*}(2317)$ as a $0^{+}$ tetraquark state

6: from QCD sum rules. Technically, four different possible currents are adopted

7: and high condensates up to dimension $12$ are included in the operator product expansion (OPE)

8: to ensure the quality of QCD sum rule analysis.

9: In the end,

10: we obtain the

11: mass value $2.37^{+0.50}_{-0.36}~\mbox{GeV}$ with the factorization parameter $\rho=1$ (or $2.23^{+0.78}_{-0.24}~\mbox{GeV}$

12: with $\rho=3$) for the

13:  scalar-scalar current,

14: which agrees well with the experimental data of $D_{s0}^{*}(2317)$ and could support

15: its explanation as a $0^{+}$ scalar-scalar tetraquark state.

16: The final result for the axial-axial configuration

17: is calculated to be $2.51^{+0.61}_{-0.43}~\mbox{GeV}$ with $\rho=1$ (or $2.52^{+0.76}_{-0.52}~\mbox{GeV}$ with $\rho=3$),

18: which is still consistent with the mass of $D_{s0}^{*}(2317)$ considering the uncertainty,

19: and then the possibility of $D_{s0}^{*}(2317)$ as a axial-axial tetraquark state can not be excluded.

20: For the pseudoscalar-pseudoscalar and the vector-vector cases, their

21: unsatisfactory OPE convergence makes that it is of difficulty to find

22: rational work windows to further acquire hadronic masses.

23: \end{abstract}