1: \begin{abstract}

2: \begin{comment}The extent \todo[fancyline]{\tiny All: Mention the MC results? The abstract

3: needs to been rewritten. Remove from "The exent to which".....to "regional

4: development policies". Start from "We consider tests....} to which countries

5: and or regions are similar across one or more dimensions is a question that

6: has long been of interest to economists and policymakers. The correct

7: identification of the extent of convergence within a regional economy is

8: paramount given that policy usually tries to achieve convergence by reducing

9: the gap between the richest and the poorest regions. Within the European

10: Union the ECB targets a \emph{single} Euro Area inflation rate, and in this

11: respect the degree to which there exists convergence in regional per capita

12: incomes and output is of critical relevance to European regional development

13: policies.

14: \end{comment}

15: \singlespacing

16: 

17: {\small In many applications common in testing for convergence the number of

18: cross-sectional units is large and the number of time periods are few. In

19: these situations asymptotic tests based on an omnibus null hypothesis are

20: characterised by a number of problems. In this paper we propose a multiple

21: pairwise comparisons method based on an a recursive bootstrap to test for

22: convergence with no prior information on the composition of convergence

23: clubs. Monte Carlo simulations suggest that our bootstrap-based test

24: performs well to correctly identify convergence clubs when compared with

25: other similar tests that rely on asymptotic arguments. Across a potentially

26: large number of regions, using both cross-country and regional data for the

27: European Union we find that the size distortion which afflicts standard

28: tests and results in a bias towards finding less convergence, is ameliorated

29: when we utilise our bootstrap test.}

30: 

31: \bigskip

32: 

33: \textbf{Keywords:} Multivariate stationarity, bootstrap tests, regional

34: convergence.

35: 

36: \medskip

37: 

38: \textbf{JEL Classifications: }C51, R11, R15.

39: \end{abstract}

40: