1: \begin{abstract}

2: Nowadays, we live in a society where people often form their opinion by accessing and discussing contents shared on social networking websites.

3: While these platforms have fostered information access and diffusion, they represent optimal environments for the proliferation of polluted contents, which is argued to be one of the co-causes of polarization/radicalization. 

4: Moreover, recommendation algorithms - intended to enhance platform usage - are likely to augment such phenomena, generating the so called \emph{Algorithmic Bias}. In this work, we study the impact that different network topologies have on the formation and evolution of opinion in the context of a recent opinion dynamic model which includes bounded confidence and algorithmic bias. Mean-field, scale-free and random topologies, as well as networks generated by the Lancichinetti-Fortunato-Radicchi benchmark, are compared in terms of opinion fragmentation/polarization and time to convergence. 

5: % The abstract should summarize the contents of the paper

6: % using at least 70 and at most 150 words. It will be set in 9-point

7: % font size and be inset 1.0 cm from the right and left margins.

8: % There will be two blank lines before and after the Abstract. 

9: % We would like to encourage you to list your keywords within

10: % the abstract section using the \keywords{...} command.

11: \keywords{opinion dynamics, complex networks, algorithmic bias}

12: \end{abstract}

13: