1: \begin{abstract}

2: In this companion paper to our study of amplification of wavetrains \cite{CGW3}, we study weakly stable semilinear 

3: hyperbolic boundary value problems with pulse data. Here weak stability means that exponentially growing modes 

4: are absent, but the so-called uniform Lopatinskii condition fails at some boundary frequency in the hyperbolic region. 

5: As a consequence of this degeneracy there is again an amplification phenomenon: outgoing pulses of amplitude 

6: $O(\eps^2)$ and wavelength $\eps$ give rise to reflected pulses of amplitude $O(\eps)$, so the overall solution 

7: has amplitude $O(\eps)$. Moreover, the reflecting pulses emanate from a radiating pulse that propagates in the 

8: boundary along a characteristic of the Lopatinskii determinant.

9: 

10: 

11: In the case of $N\times N$ systems considered here, a single outgoing pulse produces on reflection a family of 

12: incoming pulses traveling at different group velocities. Unlike wavetrains, pulses do not interact to produce resonances 

13: that affect the leading order profiles. However, pulse interactions do affect lower order profiles and so these interactions 

14: have to be estimated carefully in the error analysis. Whereas the error analysis in the wavetrain case dealt with small 

15: divisor problems by approximating periodic profiles by trigonometric polynomials (which amounts to using a high 

16: frequency cutoff), in the pulse case we approximate decaying profiles with nonzero moments by profiles with zero 

17: moments (a low frequency cutoff). Unlike the wavetrain case, we are now able to obtain a rate of convergence in 

18: the limit describing convergence of approximate to exact solutions.

19: \end{abstract}

20: