1:
2: %------------------------------------------------------
3: % Haret-Rosu.tex
4: %------------------------------------------------------
5: \documentclass{report} %debug
6: %------------------------------------------------------
7: %\documentclass[12pt]{report} %debug
8: %------------------------------------------------------
9: \usepackage[backref,colorlinks=true]{hyperref} %debug
10: %------------------------------------------------------
11: \input{epsf} %debug
12: %------------------------------------------------------
13: \begin{document} %debug
14: %------------------------------------------------------
15: %{\sl To appear as a chapter in the book {\em Artificial Black Holes} edited
16: %by M. Novello, M. Visser, and G. Volovik}
17:
18: \bigskip
19: \bigskip
20:
21: \chapter*{\bf Non-inertial quantum mechanical fluctuations}
22: % quantum mechanical fluctuations
23: %\footnote{
24: %{\sl To appear as a chapter in the book {\em Artificial Black Holes} edited
25: %by M. Novello, M. Visser, and G. Volovik}{%
26: %Non-inertial quantum mechanical fluctuations}
27: %------------------------------------------------------
28: % NON-INERTIAL ZERO-POINT FLUCTUATIONS:
29: % A LABORATORY-ORIENTED INTRODUCTION
30: %------------------------------------------------------
31: \vskip 0.5cm
32: { {\bf Haret Rosu }
33: \\[15pt]
34: Guanajuato University\\
35: Leon\\
36: Guanajuato\\
37: Mexico\\
38: E-mail: rosu@ifug3.ugto.mx }
39: %-------------------------------------------------------
40: %Contribution to workshop on
41: %ANALOG MODELS OF GENERAL RELATIVITY,
42: %Rio de Janeiro, 16-20 Oct., 2000
43: %-------------------------------------------------------
44: \vskip 2 cm
45: \noindent {\bf Abstract:}
46: {\it Zero point quantum fluctuations as seen from non-inertial
47: reference frames are of interest for several reasons. In particular,
48: because phenomena such as Unruh radiation (acceleration radiation) and
49: Hawking radiation (quantum leakage from a black hole) depend
50: intrinsically on both quantum zero-point fluctuations and some
51: appropriate notion of an accelerating vacuum state, any experimental
52: test of zero-point fluctuations in non-inertial frames is implicitly a
53: test of the foundations of quantum field theory, and the Unruh and
54: Hawking effects.}
55:
56: \vskip 1cm
57:
58: \noindent
59: {\sl To appear as a chapter in the book {\em Artificial Black Holes} (World
60: Scientific) edited
61: by M. Novello, M. Visser, and G. Volovik.}
62:
63: %------------------------------------------------------
64: \vskip 2 cm
65: %------------------------------------------------------
66: \def\ie{{\sl i.e.}}
67: \def\eg{{\sl e.g.}}
68: %------------------------------------------------------
69: \def\d{{\mathrm{d}}}
70: %------------------------------------------------------
71: \section{Introduction}
72: %------------------------------------------------------
73: \setcounter{equation} {0}
74: %------------------------------------------------------
75:
76: Analog or not, the ultimate goal of the physics described in this book
77: is to find clear evidence for gravitational and non-inertial vacuum
78: radiation. Recognized as some of the most important paradigms of
79: present-day theoretical physics, the Hawking and Unruh effects are (as
80: yet) not much more than academic results which, because of the scales
81: of the required energies/ accelerations/ masses, are not easy to
82: implement in real laboratory experiments. Indeed, from the
83: experimental standpoint, they might seem to be merely exotic
84: interpretations for what could be explained by far more mundane
85: physical effects in quantum electrodynamics, quantum optics, and
86: hydrodynamics.
87:
88: As counterpoint, in the case of the Unruh effect the so-called
89: detector method provides a well-defined radiation pattern that may be
90: thought of as vacuum noise, and should be kept under consideration for
91: possible experimental detection in clean analog experiments. In this
92: chapter, old results of Letaw on scalar vacuum radiation patterns are
93: used to emphasize the radiometric nature of the various Frenet--Serret
94: invariants for certain classes of ``stationary'' worldlines. This
95: formalism is an extension of, and alternative to, the usual notion:
96: that of adopting the thermal interpretation of the vacuum excitations
97: as seen by a uniformly accelerated quantum detector (Unruh's
98: interpretation).
99:
100: I focus next on the electromagnetic vacuum noise, surveying the
101: Hacyan-Sarmiento approach for calculating physical quantities in the
102: electromagnetic vacuum. The application of this approach to circular
103: worldlines led Mane to propose the identification of Hacyan--Sarmiento
104: zero-point radiation with the ordinary synchrotron radiation; but here
105: I provide some simple counter-arguments. I also briefly discuss Bell
106: and Leinaas' proposal of considering electrons in storage rings as
107: prototypes for an Unruh--DeWitt spin polarization detector. In the
108: final section, I sketch the similarity between the Unruh effect and
109: the so-called ``anomalous Doppler effect''. A separate observation of
110: the latter would mean a confirmation of the possibility of the first.
111:
112:
113: %------------------------------------------------------
114: \section{Vacuum Field Noise --- VFN}
115: %------------------------------------------------------
116:
117:
118: The quantum vacuum field noise (VFN)~\cite{T} that is recorded by a
119: detector moving along some classical trajectory will in general depend
120: on that trajectory. For certain restricted classes of worldline
121: trajectories $x^{\mu}(s)$, most usefully parametrized in terms of
122: proper time $s$, the observed power spectrum is stationary
123: (time-independent). Experimental observation of the power spectrum of
124: the vacuum field noise is then an important diagnostic tool that can
125: be inverted to extract information about the form of the trajectory
126: --- specifically, the curvature invariants (Frenet--Serret invariants)
127: of the worldline. As usual, I model an idealized detector as a simple
128: two-level quantum system [usually known as an Unruh--DeWitt detector].
129: For scalar quantum field vacua there are six broad classes of
130: trajectory that lead to stationary noise spectra. Basic results were
131: derived by Letaw~\cite{L} some time ago, and are reviewed below. They
132: might be of direct experimental interest in the acoustic analogy. On
133: the other hand, one should also keep in mind that non-stationary
134: vacuum noises are not completely beyond experimental reach, and can be
135: analyzed by related mathematical methods which I briefly comment on.
136:
137: %------------------------------------------------------
138: \subsection{The detector method in quantum field theory}
139: %------------------------------------------------------
140: \label{S:udw}
141: %------------------------------------------------------
142:
143: For the idealized Unruh--DeWitt detector, the interaction between the
144: detector [endowed with a monopole moment $Q(s)$\,] and the scalar
145: field $\phi(s)$ is described by
146: %--------------------
147: \begin{equation}
148: L_{int}=\lambda \; Q(s)\; \phi(s),
149: \end{equation}
150: %--------------------
151: where $\phi(s)=\phi(x(s))$ is the field along the worldline of the
152: detector and $\lambda$ is a small coupling constant that I re-scale to
153: $\lambda=1$ (since it is not important for current considerations).
154: Detecting particles in the Unruh--DeWitt apparatus requires one to
155: adopt adiabatic switching appropriate for the perturbative approach.
156: At $s=-\infty$, the detector is in the ground-state $|E_0\rangle$ and
157: the field is in the Minkowski vacuum $|0_{M}\rangle$. After the
158: detector-field interaction is switched on, the detector would not
159: remain in the state $|E_{0}\rangle$, but would make a transition to
160: $|E_{1}\rangle$. It is said that the detector ``detects'' some
161: particles. Then, the transition amplitude for the detector field
162: system to be found in $|E_1,\psi\rangle$ at $s =+\infty$ is given by
163: first-order perturbation theory as
164: %--------------------
165: \begin{equation}
166: A=i\left\langle E_1,\psi\left|
167: \int _{-\infty}^{\infty} \d s \; Q(s)\;\phi (s)
168: \right|E_{0},0_{M}\right\rangle.
169: \end{equation}
170: %--------------------
171: In order for first-order perturbation theory to apply one has to
172: assume that the matrix element of $Q$ is sufficiently small. On the
173: other hand, from the time evolution of the operator $Q$ in the
174: Heisenberg picture
175: %--------------------
176: \begin{equation}
177: Q(s)=e^{iH_{D}\;s /\hbar}\; Q(0)\; e^{-iH_{D}\;s /\hbar},
178: \end{equation}
179: %--------------------
180: where $H_{D}$ is the detector Hamiltonian, one immediately obtains
181: %--------------------
182: \begin{equation}
183: A=i \langle E_1|Q(0)|E_{0}\rangle
184: \int _{-\infty}^{\infty} \d s \;
185: e^{i(E_1-E_0)s /\hbar}\; \langle \psi|\phi (s)|0_{M}\rangle .
186: \end{equation}
187: %--------------------
188: After summation over all final states of the field $|\psi\rangle$, the
189: transition rate, \ie, the transition probability per unit proper time
190: from $E_0$ to $E_1$ is
191: %--------------------
192: \begin{equation}
193: \frac{\d P}{\d s}= |\langle E_1|Q(0)|E_{0}\rangle|^2 \; S(\omega) ,
194: \end{equation}
195: %--------------------
196: where $\omega=(E_1-E_0)/{\hbar}$ and
197: %--------------------
198: \begin{equation}
199: S(\omega)=\int _{-\infty}^{\infty} \d(s - s')
200: \; e^{-i\omega (s - s')} \; g(s - s').
201: \end{equation}
202: %--------------------
203: The integrand $g$ is the Minkowski vacuum expectation value of the
204: autocorrelation function (the Wightman function)
205: %--------------------
206: \begin{equation}
207: g(s-s')=\langle 0_{M}|\phi(s)\, \phi(s')|0_{M}\rangle.
208: \end{equation}
209: %--------------------
210: Thus, $S$ looks like a response function (or power spectrum) and $g$
211: as the ``quantum noise" in the Minkowski vacuum along the worldline
212: $x(s)$. The peculiar feature of this argument is that the quantum
213: detector performs an ``up'' transition and at the same time sees
214: (`emits') a `radiation' spectrum. From the phenomenological point of
215: view such a situation can also be encountered in the case of the
216: anomalous Doppler effect (ADE) as has been remarked by Frolov and
217: Ginzburg~\cite{FG} (see Section \ref{S:ade} below).
218:
219:
220: %------------------------------------------------------
221: \subsection{Six types of stationary scalar VFN}
222: %------------------------------------------------------
223:
224: In general, the scalar quantum field vacuum does not possess a
225: stationary vacuum excitation spectrum (abbreviated as SVES) for all
226: types of classical relativistic trajectories on which the
227: Unruh--DeWitt detector could move. Nevertheless, linear uniform
228: acceleration is {\em not} the only case with that property. This was
229: shown by Letaw, who extended Unruh's considerations, obtaining six
230: broad classes of worldlines with SVES for an Unruh--DeWitt monopole
231: detector (SVES-1 to SVES-6, see below). The line of argument is the
232: following: The Unruh--DeWitt detector is effectively immersed in a
233: scalar bath of vacuum fluctuations. Its rate of excitation is
234: determined by the energy spectrum of the scalar bath, which can be
235: expressed as the density of states times a cosine-Fourier transform of
236: the Wightman correlation function of the scalar field. Since the
237: Wightman function is directly expressed in terms of the inverse of the
238: geodesic interval what one needs to calculate is a Fourier transform
239: of the inverse of the geodesic interval $\int \d s =
240: \int\sqrt{\d x_{\mu}^2}$. Moreover, stationarity means that the
241: Wightman function depends only on the proper time interval.
242:
243: As shown by Letaw, the stationary worldlines are solutions of some
244: generalized Frenet--Serret (FS) equations on which the condition of
245: constant curvature invariants is imposed. That is, one is interested
246: in worldlines of constant curvature $\kappa$, torsion $\tau$, and
247: hyper-torsion (bi-torsion) $\nu$, respectively. These curvature
248: invariants can be easily built from the tangent, normal, and binormal
249: vectors and their derivatives. They have physical interpretation in
250: terms of the observer's acceleration and angular velocities. Notice
251: that one can employ other frameworks, such as the Newman-Penrose
252: spinor formalism as recently invoked by Unruh~\cite{un}, but the
253: Frenet--Serret framework is in overwhelming use throughout physics. It
254: is worth remarking that before Letaw, the Frenet--Serret invariants
255: have been discussed by Honig {\em et al}~\cite{Ho} in their study of
256: the motion of charged particles in homogeneous electromagnetic fields.
257: Honig {\em et al} discovered an interesting connection with the two
258: Lorentz invariants of the electromagnetic field, $E^2-H^2$ and
259: $\vec{E}\cdot \vec{H}$:
260: %
261: \begin{equation} \label{Lo1}
262: E^2 - H^2 \propto\kappa ^2-\tau ^2 -\nu ^2,
263: \end{equation}
264: %
265: \begin{equation}
266: \vec{E}\cdot \vec{H} \propto\kappa \; \nu.
267: \end{equation}
268: %
269: It is amusing to note that chirality (handedness) in the
270: electromagnetic sense ($\vec{E}\cdot \vec{H} \neq 0$) is proportional
271: to chirality in the worldline sense (nonzero hyper-torsion; $\nu\neq
272: 0$.)
273:
274: The six stationary scalar VFN can be classified according to the
275: curvature scalars of the corresponding worldlines:
276: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
277: \begin{enumerate}
278: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
279: \item
280: \underline{$\kappa =\tau=\nu=0$} $\rightarrow$
281: {\em inertial, uncurved worldlines (constant velocity)}.
282:
283: \bigskip
284:
285: SVES-1 is a trivial cubic spectrum
286: %---------
287: \begin{equation}
288: S_1(E)=\frac{E^3}{4\pi ^2}.
289: \end{equation}
290: %---------
291: This can be interpreted as a vacuum state of zero point energy $E/2$
292: per mode, with density of states $E^2/2\pi ^2$.
293:
294: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
295: \item
296: \underline{$\kappa \neq 0$, $\tau=\nu=0$} $\rightarrow$
297: {\em hyperbolic worldlines (constant rectilinear acceleration)}.
298:
299: \bigskip
300:
301: SVES-2 is Planckian allowing the interpretation of $\kappa/2\pi$ as
302: `thermodynamic' temperature. In the dimensionless variable $\epsilon
303: _{\kappa}=E/\kappa$ the vacuum spectrum reads
304: %----------
305: \begin{equation}
306: S_2(\epsilon _{\kappa})
307: =\frac{\epsilon _{\kappa}^{3}}{2\pi ^2(e^{2\pi\epsilon _{\kappa}}-1)}.
308: \end{equation}
309: %
310: The physically observed spectrum would be a linear combination of
311: SVES-1 and SVES-2.
312:
313: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
314: \item
315: \underline{$|\kappa|<|\tau|$, $\nu=0$, $\rho ^2=\tau ^2-\kappa ^2$}
316: $\rightarrow$ {\em helical worldlines}.
317:
318: \bigskip
319:
320: SVES-3 is a complicated analytic function corresponding to the case 4
321: below only in the limit $\kappa\gg \rho$
322: %------------
323: \begin{equation}
324: S_3(\epsilon _{\rho})\stackrel{\kappa/\rho\rightarrow \infty}
325: {\longrightarrow} S_4(\epsilon _{\kappa}).
326: \end{equation}
327: %------------
328: Letaw plotted the numerical integral $S_3(\epsilon _{\rho})$, where
329: $\epsilon _{\rho}=E/\rho$, for various values of $\kappa/\rho$.
330:
331: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
332: \item
333: \underline{$\kappa=\tau$, $\nu=0$}
334: $\rightarrow$ {\em the spatially projected worldlines are the
335: ``semicubical parabolas'', $y\propto\kappa \; x^{3/2}$, containing a
336: cusp (at $x=0$) where the direction of motion is reversed}.
337:
338: \bigskip
339:
340: SVES-4 is analytic, and since there are two equal curvature invariants
341: ($\kappa = \tau$) one can use the dimensionless energy variable
342: $\epsilon _{\kappa} = E/\kappa$
343: %--------------
344: \begin{equation}
345: S_{4}(\epsilon _{\kappa})= \frac{\epsilon _{\kappa}^{2}}{8\pi ^2 \sqrt{3}}
346: e^{-2\sqrt{3}\epsilon _{\kappa}}.
347: \end{equation}
348: %-------------
349: It is worth noting that $S_4$, being a monomial times an exponential,
350: is rather close to the Wien spectrum
351: $S_{W}\propto\epsilon ^3e^{- {\rm const.}\;\epsilon}$.
352:
353: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
354: \item
355: \underline{$|\kappa|>|\tau|$, $\nu=0$, $\sigma ^2=\kappa ^2-\tau^2$}
356: $\rightarrow$ {\em the spatially projected worldlines are catenaries,
357: curves of the type $x=\kappa \cosh (y/\tau)$}.
358:
359: \bigskip
360:
361: In general, SVES-5 cannot be found analytically. It is an intermediate
362: case, which for $\tau/\sigma\rightarrow 0$ tends to SVES-2, whereas
363: for $\tau/\sigma\rightarrow\infty$ tends toward SVES-4
364: %--------------------
365: \begin{equation}
366: S_2(\epsilon _{\kappa})
367: \stackrel{0\leftarrow \tau/\sigma}{\longleftarrow}
368: S_5(\epsilon _{\sigma})\stackrel{\tau/\sigma\rightarrow \infty}
369: {\longrightarrow}S_4(\epsilon _{\kappa}).
370: \end{equation}
371: %------------------
372:
373:
374: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
375: \item
376: \underline{$\nu\neq 0$, $\kappa$ and $\tau$ arbitrary}
377: $\rightarrow$ {\em rotating worldlines uniformly accelerated normal to
378: their plane of rotation}.
379:
380: \bigskip
381:
382: SVES-6 forms a three-parameter set of curves. The corresponding
383: trajectories are a superposition of the constant linearly accelerated
384: motion and uniform circular motion. SVES-6 has not been calculated by
385: Letaw, not even numerically.
386: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
387: \end{enumerate}
388: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
389:
390: Thus, only the hyperbolic worldlines, having just one nonzero
391: curvature invariant, allow for a Planckian SVES. Only that case allows
392: for a strictly one-to-one mapping between the curvature invariant
393: $\kappa$ and the `thermodynamic' temperature in the celebrated form
394: $T_{U}=\kappa /2\pi$. The vacuum field noise of semicubical parabolas
395: can be fitted by a Wien-type spectrum, the radiometric parameter then
396: corresponding to both curvature and torsion. The other stationary
397: cases, being nonanalytic, lead to the approximate determination of the
398: curvature invariants defining locally the classical worldline on which
399: the relativistic quantum detector moves.
400:
401: One very general and important statement regarding the {\em universal}
402: nature of the kinematical Frenet--Serret parameters occurring in
403: various important quantum field model problems can be formulated as
404: follows:
405:
406: \begin{quote}
407: {\em There exist accelerating classical trajectories (worldlines) on
408: which moving ideal (two-level) quantum systems can detect the scalar
409: vacuum environment as a stationary quantum field vacuum noise with a
410: spectrum directly related to the curvature invariants of the
411: worldline, thus allowing for a radiometric interpretation of those
412: invariants}.
413: \end{quote}
414:
415: According to these results, it seems more appropriate to replace the
416: thermal interpretation of Unruh by the radiometric interpretation of
417: the Frenet--Serret invariants. The latter is more general and
418: describes in a more precise way the physical situation to which the
419: Unruh effect refers, that of a {\em quantum} particle moving along a
420: {\em classical} relativistic trajectory.
421:
422:
423:
424: %------------------------------------------------------
425: \subsection{Explicit formulae for the spectra}
426: %------------------------------------------------------
427:
428: One can calculate the spectrum of vacuum field noise by means of the
429: following general formula
430: %-------------------
431: \begin{equation}
432: S_{j}(E)=\left|
433: \frac{E^2}{4\pi ^3}\int _{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{e^{-iEs}\; \d s}
434: {
435: [x_{\mu}(s)-x_{\mu}(0)]\;[x^{\mu}(s)-x^{\mu}(0)]
436: }
437: \right|=
438: \frac{E^2}{4\pi ^3}|{\rm I}_{j}|,\quad j=1...6,
439: \end{equation}
440: %--------------
441: where $x^{\mu}(s)$ is an arbitrary point on the worldline and
442: $x^{\mu}(0)$ is the initial point. The signature of the Minkowski
443: metric is $\eta _{\mu \nu}=(1,-1,-1,-1)$. I confirm Letaw's results
444: by sketching the calculation of the integrals ${\rm I}_{j}$ for the
445: six stationary cases. Simple details that have been skipped by Letaw
446: can be found here.
447:
448:
449:
450: %------------------------------------------------------
451: \begin{enumerate}
452: %------------------------------------------------------
453: \item {\bf The recta}.
454: %------------------------------------------------------
455: The worldline is $x^{\mu}(s)=(s,0,0,0)$; with initial condition
456: $x^{\mu}(0)=(0,0,0,0)$. The integral is
457: %--------------
458: \begin{equation}
459: {\rm I}_1= \int _{-\infty}^{+\infty} \frac{e^{-iEs}}{s^2}\; \d s.
460: \end{equation}
461: %---------------
462: It can be evaluated by using Cauchy's residue theorem plus the
463: expansion $e^{-iEs}=(1-iEs+...)$. The value of the integral is $\pi
464: i(-iE)=\pi E$, and therefore one gets the cubic spectrum. This
465: inertial zero-point cubic spectrum will appear in all the other five
466: stationary spectra as an additive background and therefore one may
467: take into account only the non-cubic contributions as a measure of
468: non-inertial vacuum effects.
469:
470:
471: %------------------------------------------------------
472: \item {\bf The hyperbola}.
473: %------------------------------------------------------
474: The worldline is $x^{\mu}(s)=\kappa ^{-1}(\sinh \kappa s,\cosh \kappa
475: s,0,0)$; with the initial condition $x^{\mu}(0)=\kappa
476: ^{-1}(0,1,0,0)$. Now the integral is
477: %--------------------
478: \begin{equation}
479: {\rm I}_2=
480: \kappa\int _{-\infty}^{+\infty}
481: \frac{e^{-i\epsilon _{\kappa}u}}{2(\cosh u -1)}\;\d u.
482: \end{equation}
483: %--------------------
484: Writing $e^{-i\epsilon _{\kappa}u}=\cos\epsilon _{\kappa} u -
485: i\sin\epsilon _{\kappa} u$, one makes use of formula 3.983.3 at page
486: 505 in the fourth edition of the {\em Table} of Gradshteyn and Ryzhik
487: (GR) to get
488: %-----------------------
489: \begin{equation}
490: \int _{0}^{+\infty}\frac{\cos(ax)}{\cosh x -1}dx= -\pi a\coth(\pi a).
491: \end{equation}
492: %---------------
493: The sine integral can be evaluated using Cauchy's theorem
494: %----------------
495: \begin{equation}
496: -i\int _{-\infty}^{+\infty}
497: \frac{\sin(\epsilon _{\kappa}x)dx}{\cosh x -1}=
498: \pi \epsilon _{\kappa}.
499: \end{equation}
500: %--------------------
501: Thus
502: %----------------
503: \begin{eqnarray}
504: {\rm I}_2
505: &=&
506: -\pi\epsilon _{\kappa}\coth(\pi\epsilon _{\kappa})
507: +\frac{\pi \epsilon _{\kappa}}{2}
508: \\
509: &=&
510: \pi\epsilon _{\kappa}\;
511: [1-\coth(\pi\epsilon _{\kappa})]-\frac{\pi \epsilon _{\kappa}}{2}
512: \\
513: &=&
514: -2\pi\epsilon _{\kappa}\; \frac{1}{e^{2\pi \epsilon _{\kappa}}-1}
515: -\frac{\pi\epsilon _{\kappa}}{2},
516: \end{eqnarray}
517: %-----------------
518: where the first term leads to the Planckian spectrum and the latter to
519: the cubic zero-point contribution.
520:
521:
522: %------------------------------------------------------
523: \item {\bf The helix}.
524: %------------------------------------------------------
525: The worldline is $x^{\mu}(s)=\rho ^{-2}(\tau\rho s,\kappa\cos\rho
526: s,\kappa\sin \rho s,0)$; with initial condition $x^{\mu}(0)=\rho
527: ^{-2}(0,\kappa,0,0)$. The integral reads
528: %--------------------
529: \begin{equation}
530: {\rm I}_3=\rho \int _{-\infty}^{+\infty}
531: \frac{e^{-i\epsilon _{\rho}u}}
532: {2\frac{\kappa ^2}{\rho ^2}(\cos u-1)+\frac{\tau ^2}{\rho ^2}u^2}
533: \;\d u,
534: \end{equation}
535: %-----------------
536: where
537: \begin{equation}
538: \frac{\tau ^2}{\rho ^2}-\frac{\kappa ^2}{\rho ^2}=1.
539: \end{equation}
540: According to Letaw this integral is non-analytic and indeed I was not
541: able to find any helpful formula in the GR {\em Table}.
542:
543: %------------------------------------------------------
544: \item {\bf The semicubical parabola}.
545: %------------------------------------------------------
546:
547: The worldline is $x^{\mu}(s)=(s+\frac{1}{6}\kappa ^2s^3,
548: \frac{1}{2}\kappa s^2, \frac{1}{6}\kappa ^2s^3,0)$; with initial
549: condition $x^{\mu}(0)=(0,0,0,0)$. The integral reads
550: %-----------------
551: \begin{equation}
552: {\rm I}_4
553: =
554: \kappa\int _{-\infty}^{+\infty}\frac{e^{-i\epsilon
555: _{\kappa}u}\; \d u}{u^2(1 +\frac{1}{12}u^2)}
556: =
557: \kappa{\rm I}_1-\kappa\int _{-\infty}^{+\infty}
558: \frac{e^{-i\epsilon _{\kappa}u}\;\d u}{(12+u^2)}.
559: \end{equation}
560: %----------------
561: Of interest is only the second integral that can be found in the
562: GR {\em Table} at page 359
563: %----------------
564: \begin{equation}
565: \int _{-\infty}^{+\infty}\frac{e^{-ipx}\; \d x}{a^2+x^2}=
566: \frac{\pi}{|a|}\; e^{-|ap|},
567: \end{equation}
568: %--------------------
569: for $a>0$ and $p$ real. Thus one gets
570: %-----------------
571: \begin{equation}
572: \int _{-\infty}^{+\infty}
573: \frac{e^{-i\epsilon _{\kappa}u}\; \d u}{(12+u^2)}=
574: \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{12}}\; e^{-\sqrt{12}\epsilon _{\kappa}}.
575: \end{equation}
576: %--------------------
577: The final result is
578: %----------------------
579: \begin{equation}
580: S_4=
581: \frac{\kappa ^4\epsilon _{\kappa}^{2}}{4\pi ^2\sqrt{12}}
582: \; e^{-\sqrt{12}\epsilon _{\kappa}}.
583: \end{equation}
584: %---------------------
585:
586: Interestingly, for a horizontal storage ring (guiding magnetic field
587: in the vertical $z$ direction) the orbit in the moving frame can be
588: approximated for laboratory times such that $\gamma \omega
589: _{0}|t|=O(1)$ by the following semicubical parabola
590: %
591: \begin{equation}
592: y'\approx \left({R_0 \over 2\gamma ^2}\right)\;
593: \left({6\gamma ^2|x'|\over R_0}\right)^{2/3},
594: \end{equation}
595: %
596: where $R_0$ is the instantaneous radius of curvature of a particle's
597: arbitrary trajectory.\footnote{See Fig. 2 and Eq. 2 in \cite{J}.}
598:
599:
600:
601: %------------------------------------------------------
602: \item {\bf The catenary}.
603: %------------------------------------------------------
604:
605: The worldline is $x^{\mu}(s)=\sigma ^{-2}(\kappa\sinh\sigma
606: s,\kappa\cosh\sigma s, \tau\sigma s,0)$; with initial condition
607: $x^{\mu}(0)=\sigma ^{-2} (0,\kappa,0,0)$. The integral is of the type
608: %----------------
609: \begin{equation}
610: {\rm I}_5=\sigma
611: \int _{-\infty}^{+\infty}\frac{e^{-i\epsilon _{\sigma}u} \; \d u}
612: {2\frac{\kappa ^2}{\sigma ^2}({\rm cosh} u-1)-
613: \frac{\tau ^2}{\sigma ^2}u^2},
614: \end{equation}
615: %--------------------
616: where $\frac{\tau ^2}{\sigma ^2}-\frac{\kappa ^2}{\sigma ^2}=-1$.
617: This integral turns into $I_2$ and $I_4$ in the limits mentioned in
618: the text, respectively, but again there is no helpful formula in the
619: GR {\em Table}, and thus ${\rm I}_5$ appears to be non-analytic.
620:
621:
622: %------------------------------------------------------
623: \item {\bf The helicoid (helix of variable pitch)}.
624: %------------------------------------------------------
625:
626: This is the most general case. The worldline is
627: %
628: \begin{eqnarray}
629: x^{\mu}(s)&=&\Bigg(
630: \frac{\Delta}{RR_{+}} \sinh (R_{+}s),
631: \frac{\Delta}{RR_{+}} \cosh(R_{+}s),
632: \nonumber
633: \\
634: &&
635: \qquad
636: \frac{\kappa\tau}{R\Delta R_{-}} \cos(R_{-}s),
637: \frac{\kappa \tau}{R\Delta R_{-}} \sin(R_{-}s)
638: \Bigg);
639: \end{eqnarray}
640: %
641: while the initial condition reads
642: $x^{\mu}(0)=(0,\frac{\Delta}{RR_{+}},\frac{\kappa \tau}{R\Delta
643: R_{-}},0)$. I have defined:
644: %
645: \begin{eqnarray}
646: \Delta ^2&=&\frac{1}{2}(R^2+\kappa ^2 +\tau ^2 +\nu^2);
647: \\
648: R^4&=&(\kappa ^2+\tau ^2 +\nu ^2)^2-4\kappa ^2 \tau ^2;
649: \\
650: R_{+}^2&=&\frac{1}{2}(R^2+\kappa ^2 -\tau ^2 -\nu ^2);
651: \\
652: R_{-}^2&=&\frac{1}{2}(R^2-\kappa ^2 +\tau ^2 +\nu ^2).
653: \end{eqnarray}
654:
655: \noindent
656: The following integral is obtained:
657: %------------------
658: \begin{equation}
659: {\rm I}_6=
660: R\int _{-\infty}^{+\infty}
661: \frac{e^{-i\epsilon _Ru}du}{2(\frac{\Delta}{R_{+}})^2
662: [{\cosh} (\frac{R_{+}}{R}u)
663: -1]
664: +2(\frac{\kappa \tau}{\Delta R_{-}})^2[{\cos}(\frac{R_{-}}{R}u)-1]}.
665: \end{equation}
666: %--------------------
667: This is the most complicated non-analytic stationary case, with no
668: helpful formula in the GR {\em Table}.
669: %------------------------------------------------------
670: \end{enumerate}
671: %------------------------------------------------------
672:
673: %------------------------------------------------------
674: \subsection{Non-stationary vacuum field noise}
675: %------------------------------------------------------
676:
677: Non-stationary vacuum field noise has a time-dependent spectral
678: content requiring joint time and frequency information, \ie, one needs
679: generalizations of the power spectrum concept. One can think of (i)
680: tomographical processing and/or (ii) wavelet transforms. For
681: instance, the recently proposed non-commutative tomography (NCT)
682: transform $M(s;\mu,\nu)$~\cite{MVM} seems to be an attractive way of
683: processing non-stationary signals. In the definition of $M$, $s$ is
684: just an arbitrary curve in the non-commutative time-frequency plane,
685: while $\mu$ and $\nu$ are parameters characterizing the curve. The
686: most simple examples are the axes $s=\mu t+\nu \omega$, where $\mu$
687: and $\nu$ are linear combination parameters. The non-commutative
688: tomography transform is related to the Wigner--Ville
689: quasi-distribution $W(t,\omega)$ by an invertible transformation and
690: has the following useful properties
691: %
692: \begin{eqnarray}
693: M(t;1,0)&=&|f(t)|^2,
694: \\
695: M(\omega ;0,1)&=&|f(\omega)|^2,
696: \end{eqnarray}
697: where $f$ is the analytic signal which is simulated by $M$.
698: Furthermore, employing $M$ leads to an enhanced detection of the
699: presence of signals in noise which has a small signal-to-noise ratio.
700: The latter property may be very useful in detecting VFNs, which are
701: very small `signals' with respect to more common noise sources.
702:
703: On the other hand, since in the quantum detector method the vacuum
704: autocorrelation functions are the essential physical quantities, and
705: since according to various fluctuation-dissipation theorems they are
706: related to the linear (equilibrium) response functions to an initial
707: condition/vacuum, the fluctuation-dissipation approach has been
708: developed and promoted by Sciama and collaborators~\cite{Sc}. In
709: principle, the generalization of the fluctuation-dissipation theorem
710: for some classes of out of equilibrium relaxational systems, such as
711: glasses, looks also promising for the case of non-stationary vacuum
712: noise. One can use a so-called two-time fluctuation-dissipation ratio
713: $X(t,t')$ and write a modified fluctuation-dissipation relationship
714: \cite{glass}
715: %---------------
716: \begin{equation}
717: T_{\rm eff}(t,t') \; R(t,t')=X(t,t') \;
718: \frac{\partial C(t,t')}{\partial t'},
719: \end{equation}
720: %---------------
721: where $R$ is the response function and $C$ the autocorrelation
722: function. The fluctuation-dissipation ratio is employed to perform
723: the separation of scales. Moreover, $T_{\rm eff}$ are
724: timescale-dependent quantities, making them promising for relativistic
725: VFNs, which correspond naturally to out of equilibrium conditions.
726:
727:
728: %------------------------------------------------------
729: \section{Circular electromagnetic vacuum noise}
730: %------------------------------------------------------
731:
732: %------------------------------------------------------
733: \subsection{Introduction}
734: %------------------------------------------------------
735:
736: The circular electromagnetic vacuum noise, which in principle is more
737: promising experimentally,\footnote{%
738: %------------------------------------------------------
739: Rogers \cite{rog} proposed to study the motion of a single electron in
740: a Penning trap (geonium) to detect the circular electromagnetic vacuum
741: noise. For two-level atoms in circular motion the reader is referred
742: to Audretsch {\em et al}~\cite{Aud}, whereas in the analog style
743: approach Calogeracos and Volovik \cite{CV} considered the
744: quasiparticle radiation from objects rotating in superfluid vacuum.}
745: %-----------------------------------------------------
746: has been first discussed for specific purposes by Candelas and
747: Deutsch, and by Bell and Leinaas. However, here we will pay more
748: attention to the approach of Hacyan and Sarmiento (HS)~\cite{HS} who
749: in 1989 introduced a clear-cut and general method for calculating the
750: main electromagnetic vacuum spectral quantities and applied it to the
751: basic cases of {\em linear acceleration} and {\em uniform rotation}.
752: In the latter case, they obtained a nonzero energy flux in the
753: direction of motion of the detector. It was this result that prompted
754: Mane~\cite{M} to suggest a connection with the synchrotron radiation.
755:
756: In principle, the circular vacuum noise power spectrum $S_{\rm c}$
757: could be calculated via the residue theorem, but the equation for the
758: zeros of the denominator $x^2=v^2\sin ^2 x$ (see below) is not
759: analytically solvable. Nevertheless, for $v \geq 0.85$ one can expand
760: the sine to find the zero with the smallest imaginary part, besides
761: $x=0$~\cite{Ur}.
762:
763: %------------------------------------------------------
764: \subsection{The Hacyan--Sarmiento approach}
765: %------------------------------------------------------
766:
767: Starting with the expression for the electromagnetic energy-momentum
768: tensor
769: \begin{equation}
770: \label{hs1}
771: T_{\mu \nu}=\frac{1}{16\pi}\left(
772: 4F_{\mu \alpha}\;F_{\nu}^{\alpha}+
773: \eta _{\mu \nu}\;F_{\lambda \beta}\;F^{\lambda \beta}
774: \right).
775: \end{equation}
776: Hacyan--Sarmiento define the electromagnetic two-point Wightman
777: functions as follows
778: \begin{equation}
779: \label{hs2}
780: D_{\mu \nu}^{+}(x,x')\equiv
781: \frac{1}{4}
782: \left(
783: 4F^\alpha{}_{(\mu}(x) \;F_{\nu )\alpha}(x')+
784: \eta _{\mu \nu}\; F_{\lambda \beta}(x)\; F^{\lambda \beta}(x')\right);
785: \end{equation}
786: \begin{equation}
787: \label{hs3}
788: D_{\mu \nu}^{-}(x,x')\equiv D_{\mu \nu}^{+}(x',x).
789: \end{equation}
790: This may be viewed as a variant of the ``point-splitting'' approach
791: advocated by DeWitt. Moreover, because of the properties
792: %
793: \begin{equation}
794: \label{hs4}
795: \eta^{\mu \nu}\;D_{\mu \nu}^{\pm}=0,
796: \qquad D_{\mu \nu}^{\pm}=D_{\nu \mu}^{\pm},
797: \qquad
798: \partial _{\nu}D_{\mu}^{\pm \nu}=0,
799: \end{equation}
800: %
801: the electromagnetic Wightman functions can be expressed in terms of
802: the scalar Wightman functions as follows
803: %
804: \begin{equation}
805: \label{hs5}
806: D_{\mu \nu}^{\pm}(x,x')=c\; \partial_\mu \; \partial_\nu \;D^{\pm}(x,x'),
807: \end{equation}
808: %
809: where $c$ is in general a real constant depending on the case under
810: study. This shows that from the standpoint of their vacuum
811: fluctuations the scalar and the electromagnetic fields are not so
812: different.
813:
814: Now introduce sum and difference variables
815: %
816: \begin{equation}
817: s = {t + t'\over2}; \qquad \sigma = {t-t'\over2}.
818: \end{equation}
819: %
820: Using the Fourier transforms of the Wightman functions
821: %
822: \begin{equation}
823: \label{ksy1}
824: \tilde{D}^{\pm}(\omega , s)=
825: \int _{-\infty}^{\infty} \d\sigma \;
826: e^{-i\omega \sigma}\; D^{\pm}(s,\sigma),
827: \end{equation}
828: %
829: where $\omega$ is the frequency of zero-point fields, the {\em
830: particle number density of the vacuum seen by the moving detector} and
831: the {\em spectral vacuum energy density per mode} are given by
832: %
833: \begin{equation} \label{ksy2}
834: n(\omega , s)=\frac{1}{(2\pi)^2 \omega}
835: \left[
836: \tilde{D}^{+}(\omega , s )-
837: \tilde{D}^{-}(\omega , s )
838: \right],
839: \end{equation}
840: %
841: \begin{equation} \label{ksy3}
842: \frac{\d e}{\d\omega}=\frac{\omega ^2}{\pi}
843: \left[
844: \tilde{D}^{+}(\omega , s )+
845: \tilde{D}^{-}(\omega , s )
846: \right].
847: \end{equation}
848: The most important application of these results is to a uniformly
849: rotating detector whose proper time is $s$ and angular speed is
850: $\omega _{0}$ in motion along the circular world line
851: %
852: \begin{equation}
853: \label{hswl}
854: x^{\alpha}(s)=
855: (\gamma s, R_{0}\cos (\omega _{0}s),
856: R_{0}\sin (\omega _{0}s), 0),
857: \end{equation}
858: %
859: where $R_{0}$ is the rotation radius in the inertial frame,
860: $\gamma =(1-v^2)^{-1/2}$, and $v={\omega _0 R_0}/{\gamma}$.
861: \footnote{%
862: %---------------------------------------------
863: This is correct for Galilean electromagnetism and works well at low
864: velocities and/or in gradient index (lens) media. For full Lorentz
865: covariant electrodynamics, one should use the Trocheris-Takeno
866: nonlinear relationship $v=\tanh (\omega R_0/c)$. See, {\emph{e.g.}},
867: \cite{TT}.}
868: %-----------------------------------------------
869: In this case there are two Killing vectors $k^{\alpha}=(1,0,0,0)$ and
870: $ m^{\alpha}(s)=(0,-R_{0}\sin(\omega_{0}s), R_{0}
871: \cos(\omega_{0}s,0)$. Expressing the Wightman functions in terms of
872: these two Killing vectors, HS calculated the following physically
873: observable spectral quantities (\ie, those obtained after subtracting
874: the inertial zero-point field contributions):
875:
876: %-------------------------------------------
877: \begin{itemize}
878: %-------------------------------------------
879: \item {\em The spectral energy density}
880: %-------------------------------------------
881: \begin{equation} \label{hsA}
882: \frac{\d e}{\d\omega}=
883: \frac{\gamma ^3}{2\pi ^3 R_{0}^{3}} \;
884: \frac{\omega ^2+(\gamma v \omega _{0})^2}{\omega ^2} \;
885: \frac{v^3w^2}{w^2+(2\gamma v)^2} \;
886: h_{\gamma}(w),
887: \end{equation}
888: %-------------------------------------------
889: \item {\em The spectral flux density}
890: %-------------------------------------------
891: \begin{equation} \label{hsB}
892: \frac{\d p}{\d\omega}=
893: \frac{\gamma ^3}{2\pi ^3 R_{0}^{3}}\;
894: \frac{\omega ^2+(\gamma v \omega _{0})^2}{\omega ^2}\;
895: 4v^4 \; k_{\gamma}(w),
896: \end{equation}
897: %-------------------------------------------
898: \item {\em The spectral stress density}
899: %-------------------------------------------
900: \begin{equation} \label{hsC}
901: \frac{\d s}{\d\omega}=
902: \frac{\gamma ^3}{2\pi ^3 R_{0}^{3}}\;
903: \frac{\omega ^2+(\gamma v \omega _{0})^2}{\omega ^2}\;
904: \frac{v^3w^2}{w^2+(2\gamma v)^2}\;
905: j_{\gamma}(w).
906: \end{equation}
907: %-------------------------------------------
908: \end{itemize}
909: %-------------------------------------------
910:
911: Here $(\omega ^2+(\gamma v \omega _{0})^2)/\omega ^2$ is a
912: density-of-states factor introduced for convenience and
913: $h_{\gamma}(w)$, $k_{\gamma}(w)$, and $j_{\gamma}(w)$ are the
914: following cosine-Fourier transforms
915: %
916: \begin{equation}
917: \label{hsD}
918: h_{\gamma}(w)\equiv %\frac{v^3w^2}{w^2+(2\gamma v)^2}
919: \int _{0}^{\infty}\left(\frac{N_h(x,v)}
920: %(3+v^2)x^2+(v^2+3v^4)\sin ^2x-8v^2x \sin x}
921: {\gamma ^2[x^2-v^2\sin ^2 x]^3}
922: -\frac{3}{x^4}+\frac{2\gamma ^2 v^2}{x^2}\right)\cos (wx)\; \d x;
923: \end{equation}
924: %
925: \begin{equation}
926: \label{hsE}
927: k_{\gamma}(w)\equiv -
928: \int _{0}^{\infty}\left(\frac{N_k(x,v)}{\gamma ^2[x^2-v^2\sin ^2 x]^3}
929: %x^2+v^2\sin ^2x-(1+v^2)x \sin x}{\gamma ^2[x^2-v^2\sin ^2 x]^3}
930: -\frac{3}{x^4}-\frac{\gamma ^2}{6x^2}\right)
931: \cos (wx)\; \d x;
932: \end{equation}
933: %
934: \begin{equation}
935: \label{hsF}
936: j_{\gamma}(w)\equiv %\frac{v^3w^2}{w^2+(2\gamma v)^2} f(v,w,\gamma)
937: \int _{0}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1}{\gamma ^4[x^2-v^2\sin ^2 x]^2}-
938: \frac{1}{x^4}+\frac{2\gamma ^2 v^2}{3x^2}\right)\cos (wx)\; \d x.
939: \end{equation}
940: %
941: The numerators $N_h(x,v)$ and $N_k(x,v)$ are given by
942: \begin{eqnarray}
943: N_h(x,v)&=&(3+v^2)x^2+(v^2+3v^4)\sin ^2x-8v^2x \sin x;
944: \\
945: N_k(x,v)&=&x^2+v^2\sin ^2x-(1+v^2)x \sin x.
946: \end{eqnarray}
947: %
948: The employed variables are
949: $w=\frac{2\omega}{\omega _{0}}$ and $x=\frac{\sigma \omega _{0}}{2}$.
950: %where $f(v,w,\gamma)=\frac{v^3w^2}{w^2+(2\gamma v)^2}$.
951:
952: Of special interest are the ultra-relativistic and nonrelativistic
953: limits. In the first case, $\gamma \gg 1$, the quantities
954: %
955: \begin{equation}
956: H_{\gamma}=\frac{v^3w^2}{w^2+(2\gamma v)^2}\;
957: h_{\gamma}(w),
958: \quad
959: K_{\gamma}=4v^{4}\; k_{\gamma}(w),
960: \quad
961: J_{\gamma}=\frac{v^3w^2}{w^2+(2\gamma v)^2}\; j_{\gamma}(w),
962: \end{equation}
963: %
964: have the following scaling property
965: %
966: \begin{equation}
967: X_{k\gamma}(kw)=k^3X_{\gamma}(w),
968: \end{equation}
969: %
970: where $k$ is an arbitrary constant, and $X=H,K,J$. This is the same
971: scaling property as that of a Planckian distribution with a
972: temperature proportional to $\gamma$.
973:
974:
975: %------------------------------------------------------
976: %\subsection{ Nonrelativistic limit of the HS approach}
977: %------------------------------------------------------
978:
979: A detailed discussion of the nonrelativistic limit has been provided
980: by Kim, Soh, and Yee~\cite{KSY}, who used the parameters $v$ and
981: $\omega _{0}$, and not acceleration and speed as used by Letaw and
982: Pfautsch for the circular scalar case~\cite{LP}. They obtained a
983: series expansion in velocity
984: %
985: \begin{equation}
986: \label{ksy6}
987: %\tilde{D}^{-}(\omega)
988: \frac{de}{d\omega}=
989: \frac{\omega ^3}{\pi ^2}
990: \left[
991: \frac{\omega _{0}}{\gamma\omega}
992: \sum _{n=0}^{\infty}
993: \frac{v^{2n}}{2n+1}\sum _{k=0}^{n}(-1)^{k}
994: \;
995: \frac{(n-k-\frac{\omega}{\gamma \omega _0})^{2n+1}}{k!\; (2n-k)!}
996: \;
997: H\left(n-k-\frac{\omega}{\gamma \omega _0}\right)\right],
998: \end{equation}
999: %
1000: where $H$ is the usual Heavyside step function. Thus, to a specified
1001: power of the velocity many vacuum harmonics could contribute; making
1002: the energy density spectrum quasi-continuous.
1003:
1004:
1005:
1006:
1007:
1008: %------------------------------------------------------
1009: \subsection[Synchrotron radiation as vacuum fluctuations?]{%
1010: Synchrotron radiation as electromagnetic vacuum fluctuations ?}
1011: %------------------------------------------------------
1012:
1013: In 1991, Mane used the Hacyan--Sarmiento formula for the energy flux
1014: to argue that its time component is related to the synchrotron
1015: radiation. The Hacyan--Sarmiento Poynting flux is directed along the
1016: Lorentz boost from the laboratory frame to the rest frame of the
1017: observer, which is taken as the $y$ axis. It can be written
1018: %--------------------
1019: \begin{equation}
1020: \label{mane1}
1021: p_{y}=\frac{1}{1440\pi ^2}\;
1022: \frac{\hbar \gamma ^8 \omega _{0}^4 v}{c^4}
1023: \; (50 -47 \gamma ^{-2}).
1024: \end{equation}
1025: Note that $p_{y}$ is proportional to $\hbar$ and therefore becomes
1026: zero in the classical limit. However, for electrons which couple to
1027: this flux via the fine structure constant $\alpha =e^2/\hbar c$, the
1028: radiation effect looks totally classical. The recoil induced by the
1029: flux of the vacuum fluctuations on the four-momentum of the particle
1030: per unit proper time is
1031: %--------------------
1032: \begin{equation}
1033: \label{mane2}
1034: \alpha \, A \, p_{y}\propto \frac{e^2\gamma ^4\omega _{0}^2 v}{c^3},
1035: \end{equation}
1036: where $A\approx R_{0}^{2}c^2/(v^2\gamma ^4)$ is the transverse
1037: interaction area between the electron and the electromagnetic field.
1038: In the laboratory frame, the energy loss of the particle per unit
1039: laboratory time is given by the Larmor formula
1040: \begin{equation}
1041: \label{mane3}
1042: I=\frac{2}{3}\;\frac{e^2}{c^3}(\gamma ^2 \omega _{0}v)^2.
1043: \end{equation}
1044: This is related to the damping force $\vec{F}$ in the form
1045: $I=\vec{F}\cdot \vec{v}$ and therefore the recoil induced by
1046: synchrotron radiation on the four-momentum of the particle per unit
1047: proper time is again proportional to ${e^2\gamma ^4\omega _{0}^2
1048: v}/{c^3}$ as in Eq.~(\ref{mane2}). Therefore, the order of magnitude
1049: of the recoil of the particle induced by the $\alpha$ coupling to the
1050: vacuum flux is equal to that derived by the Larmor formula in the
1051: ultra-relativistic limit.
1052:
1053: If one goes as far as accepting the idea that synchrotron radiation is
1054: due to noninertial electromagnetic vacuum fluctuations, one should
1055: reproduce in this approach all the many basic features of the
1056: synchrotron radiation that are known from both theory and measurements
1057: at storage rings. Recall, for example, that the Schwinger spectral
1058: intensity of the magneto-bremsstrahlung in the synchrotron
1059: regime~\cite{S} is proportional to the so-called shape function
1060: %----------------------------------------
1061: \begin{equation}
1062: \label{sw1}
1063: W_{\omega}\propto
1064: F\left(\frac{\omega}{\omega _m}\right),
1065: \end{equation}
1066: %--------------------
1067: where $\omega _m$ is given in terms of the cyclotron radian frequency
1068: $\omega _c$ as $\omega _m =\omega _c \gamma ^3$, and the shape
1069: function $F$ is given by
1070: %
1071: \begin{equation}
1072: F(\zeta) =
1073: \frac{9\sqrt{3}}{8\pi}\;\zeta \;
1074: \int _{\zeta} ^{\infty} K_{5/3}(z)\; \d z,
1075: \end{equation}
1076: where $K$ is the MacDonald (modified Bessel) function of the quoted
1077: fractional order. The small and large asymptotic limits of the
1078: synchrotron shape function are as follows
1079: %-------------------
1080: \begin{equation}
1081: \label{sw2}
1082: F(\zeta \ll 1)\approx 1.33\;\zeta ^{1/3},
1083: \end{equation}
1084: %--------------------
1085: and
1086: %--------------------
1087: \begin{equation} \label{sw3}
1088: F(\zeta \gg 1)\approx 0.78\;\zeta ^{1/2}\;e^{-\zeta},
1089: \end{equation}
1090: %--------------------
1091: with a maximum (amount of radiation) to be found at the frequency
1092: $\omega_{m}/3$. An examination of the Hacyan--Sarmiento asymptotic
1093: limits shows that there are clear differences between the
1094: Hacyan--Sarmiento and synchrotron energy density spectrum. Neither of
1095: the two limits coincide, neither the Hacyan--Sarmiento spectrum
1096: divided in two equal parts by its peak frequency as in the case of
1097: synchrotron radiation. Moreover, the well-defined polarization state
1098: of synchrotron radiation that can be calculated in closed form in
1099: terms of the squares of Bessel $K_{1/3}$ and $K_{2/3}$ functions in
1100: electrodynamics would prove really difficult to obtain in the vacuum
1101: approach. Finally, an expansion in velocity powers of the synchrotron
1102: radiation does not coincide with that in Eq.~(\ref{ksy6}). In the
1103: opinion of the author, the circular electromagnetic vacuum noise
1104: should be considered as only a radiation signal embedded in the
1105: synchrotron radiation background.
1106:
1107:
1108:
1109: %------------------------------------------------------
1110: \subsection[Electron beam polarization at storage rings]{%
1111: Electron beam polarization at storage rings:
1112: \\ Spin flip synchrotron radiation versus circular electromagnetic
1113: vacuum noise}
1114: %------------------------------------------------------
1115:
1116: Electromagnetic circular vacuum noise is interesting not only because
1117: of the Hacyan--Sarmiento results and Mane's suggestion but also as
1118: being responsible, according to Bell and Leinaas~\cite{BL}, for the
1119: electron depolarization at storage rings. This famous proposal was put
1120: under intense focus in 1998 at the Monterey conference organized by
1121: Pisin Chen, where one of the most authoritative contrarians, Professor
1122: J.D. Jackson declared~\cite{J2}:
1123: %
1124: \begin{quote}
1125: {\emph{ Avoid the indiscriminate appeal to Unruh in order to
1126: ``understand'' something amenable to a simpler explanation.}}
1127: \end{quote}
1128: %
1129: The following is a brief introduction to this problem. It has been
1130: included here as an illustration of the confrontation of theoretical
1131: ideas with the experimental market; a confrontation eagerly awaited
1132: for the attractive analog proposals presented in this book.
1133:
1134: The Bell-Leinaas proposal relies on the spin degree of freedom of the
1135: electron in an external magnetic field $B_0$ along the $z$ axis. The
1136: spin may be thought to have two (quasi)stationary states corresponding
1137: to $\sigma _{z}=\pm 1$, with an energy splitting $\Delta =2|\mu|\;
1138: |B_{0}|$. This approximation is valid when a second term in the
1139: effective spin-field interaction Hamiltonian, due to the so-called
1140: Thomas precession, is not included. Thus, the electron looks in a
1141: first approximation like an Unruh--DeWitt detector. The transitions
1142: between the two spin states induced by the radiation field are then
1143: written in terms of first-order time-dependent perturbation theory,
1144: and a thermal ratio is obtained as if produced by the equilibrium
1145: ratio of populations of the upper and lower levels. The effect of the
1146: Thomas precession term in the effective Hamiltonian does not alter the
1147: shape of the polarization curve, and only shifts it horizontally when
1148: plotted as a function of the magnetic moment.
1149:
1150: However, there is a simple quantum electrodynamical explanation of the
1151: polarization effect at storage rings in terms of the so called
1152: spin-flip synchrotron radiation that has been proposed by Sokolov and
1153: Ternov in 1963 \cite{ST}. The spin-flip radiated power is very small
1154: with respect to the ordinary synchrotron radiation, becoming of the
1155: same order only at $\gamma _{sf}=(mcR_0/\hbar)^{1/2}$, which for a
1156: common storage ring is around $\gamma \approx 6 \times 10^{6}$. This
1157: is more than two orders of magnitude higher than the actual $\gamma <
1158: 10^{4}$ of electrons in current storage rings leading to a spin-flip
1159: radiated power representing only $10^{-11}$ of the usual (non
1160: spin-flip) synchrotron emitted power. It is only because the spin flip
1161: accumulates over a time scale of tens of minutes to a few hours that
1162: one gets the observed asymptotic polarization
1163: $P_{lim}=8/5\sqrt{3}=0.924$.
1164:
1165: It is either this non-stationarity of the spin-flip synchrotron
1166: radiation, or the fact that the orbiting electrons are actually more
1167: complicated interacting systems than simple Unruh--DeWitt detectors,
1168: that lead only to frequency-dependent effective temperatures, which in
1169: the opinion of accelerator people are not useful parameters.
1170:
1171: The description of radiative polarization in terms of spin levels came
1172: under the scrutiny of Professor Jackson long ago~\cite{J}. He showed
1173: that the spacing between orbital levels is very small compared to the
1174: magnetic dipole M1 transition energy, and therefore the M1 transition
1175: will involve some changes in the orbital quantum number. In 1973,
1176: Derbenev and Kondratenko~\cite{DK} obtained, in a quasi-classical
1177: approach, a formula for the equilibrium polarization in which
1178: spin-orbit effects are included through a spin-orbit coupling
1179: function. Their formula is considered to be the standard result for
1180: the transverse polarization at storage rings. According to the
1181: Derbenev--Kondratenko formula, for the range $0<g<1.2$ one of the
1182: levels is preferentially populated with respect to the other one.
1183: This effect cannot be reproduced in the Bell--Leinaas approach without
1184: resorting to time-dependent couplings and frequency-dependent
1185: `temperatures`~\cite{Ur}. In 1987, Bell and Leinaas published a more
1186: detailed analysis of their proposal, in which (still assuming a
1187: thermal spectrum of the spin excitations) they took into account the
1188: fluctuations in the orbital motion. They obtained a polarization
1189: formula rather close to the standard one with some differences only
1190: close to a narrow depolarizing resonance. The claim is that when
1191: passing through the resonance the polarization falls from 92\% to
1192: -17\% followed by an increase to 99\% before settling again to 92\%.
1193:
1194: Thus, the confirmation of their calculation, and of the thermal vacuum
1195: bath, as opposed to the Sokolov--Ternov limiting polarization would
1196: require precise experimental measurements of a transient passing
1197: through a depolarizing resonance, an experiment that is still to be
1198: performed.
1199:
1200:
1201: %------------------------------------------------------
1202: \section{Unruh effect {\emph{versus}} anomalous Doppler effect}
1203: %------------------------------------------------------
1204: \label{S:ade}
1205: %-----------------------------------------------------------
1206: %ADE: Brief definition
1207: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1208:
1209: The concept of the anomalous Doppler effect (ADE) was introduced in
1210: classical electrodynamics by Frank in 1942~\cite{Frank}. ADE refers
1211: to the waves emitted {\emph{within}} the Cherenkov cone by a
1212: ``superluminal'' oscillator moving in a refractive medium. (Frank's
1213: example is an electric dipole harmonically oscillating at angular
1214: frequency $\Omega$.) By definition, these waves exhibit an anomalous
1215: Doppler shift in the sense that their frequencies (with respect to
1216: $\Omega$) have a negative Doppler directivity factor $D$ (see below)
1217: and are given by $\omega_{ADE}=\Omega /D$. In the quantum version of
1218: this phenomenon, as discussed by Frolov and Ginzburg, one uses the
1219: energy-momentum conservation law for massless Bose radiation from a
1220: superluminal two-level detector to get the energy formula (\ref{ADE1})
1221: below.
1222:
1223: As we have already mentioned in Section (\ref{S:udw}), when studied
1224: with the detector method the Unruh effect for a detector with internal
1225: degrees of freedom is in some ways very similar to this anomalous
1226: Doppler effect (ADE), since in both cases the quantum detector is
1227: radiating `photons' while passing into the upper level and not on the
1228: lower one~\cite{FG} (see Fig.\ref{F:ade}).
1229:
1230: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
1231: %%% Normal and anomalous Doppler effects
1232: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
1233: \begin{figure}[htb]
1234: \vbox{
1235: \vskip 20 pt
1236:
1237: \centerline{\epsfxsize=5.0in\epsffile{ade.eps}}
1238:
1239: \caption[Normal and anomalous Doppler effects]{%
1240: \label{F:ade}
1241: {\sl The normal and anomalous Doppler effects and the corresponding
1242: transitions.
1243: \smallskip}
1244: }
1245: }
1246: \end{figure}
1247: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
1248:
1249: This is refrained in the well-known conclusion of Unruh and
1250: Wald~\cite{wal} when they considered the uniformly accelerated quantum
1251: detector looked upon from the inertial reference frame:
1252: %
1253: \begin{quote}
1254: {\emph{When the observer places himself in an inertial reference frame
1255: then he is able to observe both the excited quantum detector
1256: (furnishing at the same time energy to it) and the `photons'. By
1257: writing down the energy-momentum conservation law he will be inclined
1258: to say that the `photons' are emitted precisely when the detector is
1259: excited.}}
1260: \end{quote}
1261: %
1262: Neglecting recoil, absorption, and dispersion (a completely ideal
1263: case) the elementary radiation events for a two-level detector with
1264: the change of the detector proper energy denoted by $\delta\epsilon$
1265: are classified according to the photon energy formula~\cite{FG}
1266: %--------------------
1267: \begin{equation}
1268: \label{ADE1}
1269: \hbar\omega ={ -\frac{\delta\epsilon}{D\gamma}}
1270: \end{equation}
1271: %--------------------
1272: where $\gamma$ is the relativistic velocity factor ($\gamma> 1$) and
1273: D is the Doppler directivity factor
1274: %--------------------
1275: \begin{equation}
1276: \label{ADE2}
1277: D = 1 - \left({vn\over c}\right) \cos\theta.
1278: \end{equation}
1279: %--------------------
1280: The discussion of signs in Eq.~(\ref{ADE1}) implies 3 cases as follows:
1281: %--------------------
1282: \begin{enumerate}
1283: \item
1284: D$ >$ 0 for normal Doppler effect (NDE, $\delta\epsilon<0$,
1285: $\theta >\theta _c$)
1286: %--------------------
1287: \item
1288: D = 0 for Cherenkov effect (CE, $\delta\epsilon=0$, undetermined case,
1289: $\theta =\theta _c$)
1290: %--------------------
1291: \item
1292: D$ <$ 0 for anomalous Doppler effect (ADE, $\delta\epsilon>0$,
1293: $\theta <\theta _c$).
1294: \end{enumerate}
1295: %--------------------
1296: Consequently, for a quantum system endowed with internal degrees of
1297: freedom the stationary population of levels is determined by the
1298: probability of radiation in the ADE and NDE regions. The possibility
1299: of inducing population inversion by means of the ADE has been
1300: extensively discussed in the literature since a long time
1301: ago~\cite{unpub}.
1302:
1303: Bolotovsky and Bykov~\cite{bob} have studied the space-time properties
1304: of ADE in the simple case of a superluminal dipole ($v>c/n$)
1305: propagating in uniform rectilinear motion in a non-dispersive
1306: medium. These authors claim a positive theoretical result with regard
1307: to the separate observation of the ADE phenomenon for this case. It is
1308: not, unfortunately, a realistic case and requires a special equation
1309: of motion of the dipole. Theoretical and experimental investigations of
1310: the possible manifestation of ADE in dispersive and/or lens media is
1311: an important task for the future.
1312:
1313: A direct experimental evidence of ADE would be highly valuable as
1314: being equivalent to a test of the Unruh effect. The acoustic ADE is
1315: another challenge for the future \cite{Marvin}.
1316:
1317: %------------------------------------------------------
1318: \section{Summary}
1319: %------------------------------------------------------
1320:
1321: As is the case for all claimed quantum vacuum effects (including the
1322: mechanical Casimir effect), the stationary radiative spectra surveyed
1323: in this chapter can be attributed equally well to radiation reaction
1324: fields, \ie, to solutions of the inhomogeneous Klein-Gordon or Maxwell
1325: equations evaluated at the source~\cite{bd}. However, the main point
1326: we want to emphasize is different, namely: These radiation patterns
1327: (if they really exist --- remember the calculations are all performed
1328: in first-order perturbation theory, or in order $\alpha$ for
1329: electrodynamic radiation reaction fields) can be used to extract
1330: radiometric information related to the Frenet--Serret geometric
1331: invariants of the trajectories of the relativistic corpuscules.
1332:
1333: Finally, we emphasise that over the last few years the physics
1334: community has become aware of many interesting similarities/analogies
1335: between the Hawking/Unruh effects and shock-type effects in material
1336: media. A very promising line of research could be the study of the
1337: Cherenkov effect, and the associated anomalous and normal Doppler
1338: effects of relativistic dipoles propagating in strongly dispersive
1339: substances. Potentially realistic laboratory configurations for
1340: examining these effects are, for example, Cherenkov-type experiments
1341: with bunches of electric dipoles (polarization pulses) created by
1342: femtosecond optical pulses in electro-optic materials~\cite{eo}. In
1343: addition, radiation from vortices in two-dimensional annular Josephson
1344: junctions~\cite{kysv}, or even from other `relativistic' defects in
1345: condensed-matter physics should be taken into account from the
1346: perspective of this book.
1347:
1348:
1349:
1350:
1351:
1352:
1353: \bigskip
1354: {\bf Acknowledgements:} The author would like to thank the organizers
1355: of the workshop for inviting him to this interesting event.
1356:
1357:
1358: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1359: \begin{thebibliography} {99}
1360: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1361:
1362: \bibitem{T} For review, see S. Takagi,
1363: ``Vacuum noise and stress induced by uniform acceleration",
1364: Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. {\bf 88}, 1 (1986).
1365:
1366: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1367: \bibitem{L}
1368: J.R. Letaw,
1369: ``Stationary world lines and the vacuum excitation of
1370: noninertial detectors",
1371: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 23}, 1709 (1981).
1372:
1373: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1374: \bibitem{FG}
1375: V.P. Frolov and V.L. Ginzburg,
1376: ``Excitation and radiation of an accelerated detector and anomalous
1377: Doppler effect",
1378: Phys. Lett. A {\bf 116}, 423 (1986).
1379:
1380:
1381: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1382: \bibitem{un}
1383: W. Unruh,
1384: ``Radiation reaction fields for an accelerated dipole for scalar and
1385: electromagnetic radiation",
1386: Phys. Rev. A {\bf 59}, 131 (1999).
1387:
1388: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1389: \bibitem{Ho}
1390: E. Honig, E.L. Schucking, and C.V. Vishveshwara,
1391: ``Motion of charged particles in homogeneous electromagnetic fields",
1392: J. Math. Phys. {\bf 15}, 774 (1974).
1393: \\
1394: For higher-dimensional generalization,
1395: see B.R. Iyer and C.V. Vishveshwara,
1396: ``The Frenet--Serret formalism and black holes in higher dimensions",
1397: Class. Quant. Grav. {\bf 5}, 961 (1988).
1398:
1399: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1400: \bibitem{MVM}
1401: V.I. Man'ko and R. Vilela Mendes,
1402: ``Noncommutative time-frequency tomography",
1403: Phys. Lett. A {\bf 263}, 53 (1999) [physics/9712022].
1404:
1405: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1406: \bibitem{Sc}
1407: P. Candelas and D.W. Sciama,
1408: ``Irreversible thermodynamics for black holes",
1409: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 38}, 1372 (1977).
1410:
1411:
1412: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1413: \bibitem{glass}
1414: L.F. Cugliandolo, J. Kurchan and L. Peliti,
1415: ``Energy flow, partial equilibration and effective temperatures
1416: in systems with slow dynamics",
1417: Phys. Rev. {\bf E 55}, 3898 (1997) [cond-mat/9611044];
1418: \\
1419: R. Exartier and L. Peliti,
1420: ``Measuring effective temperatures in nonequilibrium systems",
1421: Eur. Phys. J. {\bf B 16}, 119 (2000), [cond-mat/9910412].
1422:
1423:
1424: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1425: \bibitem{rog}
1426: J. Rogers,
1427: ``Detector for the temperature-like effect of acceleration",
1428: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 61}, 2113 (1988).
1429:
1430: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1431: \bibitem{Aud}
1432: J. Audretsch, R. M\"uller, and M. Holzmann,
1433: ``Generalized Unruh effect and Lamb shift on arbitrary
1434: stationary trajectories",
1435: Class. Quant. Grav. {\bf 12}, 2927 (1995).
1436:
1437: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1438: \bibitem{CV}
1439: A. Calogeracos and G.E. Volovik,
1440: ``Rotational quantum friction in superfluids: Radiation from
1441: object rotating in superfluid vacuum",
1442: Pis'ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. {\bf 69}, 257 (1999).
1443:
1444:
1445: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1446: \bibitem{HS}
1447: S. Hacyan and A. Sarmiento,
1448: ``Vacuum stress-energy tensor of the electromagnetic field in
1449: rotating frames",
1450: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 40}, 2641 (1989);
1451: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 179}, 287 (1986).
1452:
1453: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1454: \bibitem{M}
1455: S.R. Mane, ``Comment on HS",
1456: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 43}, 3578 (1991);
1457: \\
1458: See also, T. Hirayama and T. Hara,
1459: ``A calculation on the self-field of a point charge and the
1460: Unruh effect",
1461: Prog. Theor. Phys. {\bf 103}, 907 (2000) [gr-qc/9910111].
1462:
1463: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1464: \bibitem{Ur}
1465: W.G. Unruh,
1466: ``Acceleration radiation for orbiting electrons",
1467: Phys. Rept. {\bf 307}, 163 (1998) [hep-th/9804158].
1468:
1469: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1470: \bibitem{TT}
1471: S. Kichenassamy and R.A. Krikorian,
1472: ``Note on Maxwell's equations in relativistically rotating frames",
1473: J. Math. Phys. {\bf 35}, 5726 (1994);
1474: \\
1475: R.D.M. De Paola and N.F. Svaiter,
1476: ``A rotating vacuum and a quantum version of Newton's bucket experiment",
1477: Class. Quant. Grav. {\bf 18}, 1799 (2001) [gr-qc/0009058].
1478:
1479:
1480: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1481: \bibitem{KSY}
1482: S.K. Kim, K.S. Soh, and J.H. Yee,
1483: ``Zero-point field in a circular-motion frame",
1484: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 35}, 557 (1987).
1485:
1486: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1487: \bibitem{LP}
1488: J.R. Letaw and J.D. Pfautsch,
1489: ``Quantized scalar field in rotating coordinates",
1490: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 22}, 1345 (1980).
1491:
1492: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1493: \bibitem{S}
1494: J. Schwinger,
1495: ``On the classical radiation of accelerated electrons",
1496: Phys. Rev. {\bf 75}, 1912 (1949).
1497:
1498: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1499: \bibitem{BL}
1500: J.S. Bell and J.M. Leinaas,
1501: ``Electrons as accelerated thermometers",
1502: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 212}, 131 (1983);
1503: ``The Unruh effect and quantum fluctuations of electrons in
1504: storage rings",
1505: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 284}, 488 (1987).
1506:
1507: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1508: \bibitem{J2}
1509: J.D. Jackson,
1510: ``On effective temperatures and electron spin
1511: polarization in storage rings",
1512: in {\em Quantum aspects of beam physics}, ed. Pisin Chen,
1513: World Scientific (1999) pp. 622-625 [physics/9901038].
1514:
1515: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1516: \bibitem{ST}
1517: A.A. Sokolov and I.M. Ternov,
1518: ``On polarization and spin effects in the theory of synchrotron radiation'',
1519: Dokl. Akad. Nauk {\bf 153}, 1052 (1964)
1520: [Sov. Phys. Dokl. {\bf 8}, 1203 (1964)].
1521:
1522: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1523: \bibitem{J}
1524: J.D. Jackson,
1525: ``On understanding spin-flip synchrotron radiation and the transverse
1526: polarization of electrons in storage rings",
1527: Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 48}, 417 (1976).
1528: \\
1529: For a recent review see, D.P. Barber,
1530: ``Electron and proton spin polarization in storage rings
1531: --- an introduction",
1532: in {\em Quantum aspects of beam physics}, ed. Pisin Chen,
1533: World Scientific (1999) pp. 67-90 [physics/9901038].
1534:
1535: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1536: \bibitem{DK}
1537: Ya. S. Derbenev and A.M. Kondratenko,
1538: ``Polarization kinetics of particles in storage rings",
1539: Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. {\bf 64}, 1918 (1973)
1540: [Sov. Phys. JETP {\bf 37}, 968 (1973)].
1541:
1542: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1543: \bibitem{wal}
1544: W.G. Unruh and R.M. Wald,
1545: ``What happens when an accelerating observer detects a Rindler particle",
1546: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 29}, 1047 (1984).
1547:
1548: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1549: \bibitem{unpub}
1550: See Section 11 and corresponding references in H. Rosu,
1551: ``Hawking-like and Unruh-like effects: Toward experiments?",
1552: Gravitation \& Cosmology {\bf 7}, 1 (2001) [gr-qc/9406012].
1553:
1554: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1555: \bibitem{Frank}
1556: I.M. Frank, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Fiz. {\bf 6}, 3 (1942).
1557:
1558: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1559: \bibitem{bob}
1560: B.M. Bolotovski and V.P. Bykov,
1561: ``On the theory of ADE",
1562: Radiofizika {\bf 32}, 386 (1989).
1563:
1564: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1565: \bibitem{Marvin}
1566: M.E. Goldstein, {\em Aeroacoustics}, (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1976).
1567:
1568: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1569: \bibitem{bd}
1570: A.O. Barut and J.P. Dowling,
1571: ``Quantum electrodynamics based on self fields:
1572: On the origin of thermal radiation detected by an accelerated observer",
1573: Phys. Rev. A {\bf 41}, 2277 (1990).
1574:
1575: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1576: \bibitem{eo}
1577: D.H. Austin, K.P. Cheung, J.A. Valdmanis, and D.A. Kleinman,
1578: ``Cherenkov radiation from femtosecond optical pulses in electro-optic
1579: media",
1580: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 53}, 1555 (1984).
1581: \\
1582: See also,
1583: T.E. Stevens, J.K. Wahlstrand, J. Kuhl, R. Merlin,
1584: ``Cherenkov radiation at speeds below the light threshold:
1585: Phonon-assisted phase matching",
1586: Science {\bf 291}, 627 (2001) and references therein.
1587:
1588: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1589: \bibitem{kysv}
1590: See, \eg,
1591: V.V. Kurin, A.V. Yulin, I.A. Shereshevskii, and N.K. Vdovicheva,
1592: ``Cherenkov radiation of vortices in a two-dimensional annular
1593: Josephson junction",
1594: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 80}, 3372 (1998).
1595:
1596: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1597: \end{thebibliography}
1598: %------------------------------------------------------------------
1599:
1600: %------------------------------------------------------
1601: \end{document} %debug
1602: %------------------------------------------------------
1603: