1: 

2: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

5: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

7: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

8: \documentclass[12pt]{article}

9: \usepackage{amssymb}

10: \usepackage{latexsym}

11: \usepackage{graphicx}

12: \def\baselinestretch{1.1}

13: \textheight 23.5cm

14: \textwidth 16cm

15: \parskip 1ex

16: 

17: \oddsidemargin 0pt

18: \evensidemargin 0pt

19: %\topmargin -10pt

20: \topmargin -40pt

21: \jot = .5ex

22: 

23: \newcommand{\rf}[1]{(\ref{#1})}

24: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}

25: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}

26: 

27: \def\appendix#1{

28:   \addtocounter{section}{1}

29:   \setcounter{equation}{0}

30:   \renewcommand{\thesection}{\Alph{section}}

31:   \section*{Appendix}

32:   \addcontentsline{toc}{section}{Appendix \thesection\ \ \ #1}

33:   }

34: 

35: \def\acknowledgment#1{

36:   \addtocounter{section}{1}

37:   \setcounter{equation}{0}

38:   \renewcommand{\thesection}{\Alph{section}}

39:   \section*{Acknowledgments}

40:   \addcontentsline{toc}{section}{Acknowledgments \thesection\ \ \ #1}

41:   }

42: 

43: 

44: 

45: \newcommand{\newsection}{    % Numeration of eqs. is automatic

46: \setcounter{equation}{0}

47: \section}

48: \newcommand{\non}{\nonumber \\*}

49: 

50: \newcommand{\eq}[1]{Eq.~(\ref{#1})}

51: \def \ov {\over }

52: \def \unl {\underline}

53: \def\bea{\begin{eqnarray}}

54: \def\eea{\end{eqnarray}}

55: \def \ci {\cite}

56: \def \de{\partial}

57: \def \x{{\bf x}}

58: \def\y{{\bf y}}

59: \def\k{{\bf k}}

60: \def\LB{\left(}

61: \def\RB{\right)}

62: \def\be{\begin{equation}}

63: \def\ee{\end{equation}}

64: \def\la{\label}

65: \def \bi{\bibitem}

66: \def \Tr {{\rm tr}}

67: \def\O{{\cal O}}

68: \def\C{{\cal C}}

69: \def\tcm{\mbox{${\tilde{\cal M}}$}}

70: \def\tca{\mbox{${\tilde{\cal A}}$}}

71: \def\te{\mbox{${\tilde{E}}$}}

72: \def\tcn{\mbox{${\tilde{\cal N}}$}}

73: \def\tp{\mbox{${\tilde P}$}}

74: \def\LA{\langle}

75: \def\RA{\rangle}

76: \def\X{{\bar X}}

77: \def \g{{\cal G}}

78: \def\e9{\mbox{${E_9}$}}

79: \def\tph{{{\tilde \phi}}}

80: \def\ph{{{\phi}}}

81: \def\tf{\mbox{${\tilde F}$}}

82: \def\tt{\mbox{${\tilde T}$}}

83: \def\tl{\mbox{${\tilde \Lambda}$}}

84: \def\to{\mbox{${\tilde \Omega}$}}

85: \def \g{{\cal G}}

86: \def \t{{\cal T}}

87: \def\es{\mbox{${E\llap/}$}}

88: \def\o{\mbox{${\Omega}$}}

89: 

90: \font\mybbb=msbm10 at 8pt

91: \font\mybb=msbm10 at 12pt

92: \def\bbb#1{\hbox{\mybbb#1}}

93: \def\bb#1{\hbox{\mybb#1}}

94: \def\pRe{\bbb{R}}

95: \def\Re {\bb{R}}

96: \def\Z {\bb{Z}}

97: \def\T {\bb{T}}

98: \def\id{\protect{{1 \kern-.28em {\rm l}}}}

99: 

100: \begin{document}

101: 

102: \setcounter{page}{1}

103: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\arabic{footnote}}

104: \setcounter{footnote}{0}

105: 

106: \begin{titlepage}

107: \begin{flushright}

108: CU-TP-1013\\

109: \end{flushright}

110: \vspace{1cm}

111: 

112: \begin{center}

113: {\LARGE Two Black Hole Holography, Lensing and Intensity}

114: 

115: \vspace{1.1cm}

116: {\large{Mark G. Jackson}\footnote{

117: E-mail: markj@phys.columbia.edu} }\\

118: 

119: \vspace{18pt}

120: 

121: 

122: {\it Department of Physics}

123: 

124: {\it Columbia University}

125: 

126: {\it  New York City, NY 10027}

127: \\

128: \end{center}

129: \vskip 0.6 cm

130: 

131: 

132: \begin{abstract}

133: We numerically verify the analysis of the ``expanding horizon" theory of Susskind in 

134: relation to the 't Hooft holographic conjecture.  By using a numerical 

135: simulation to work out the holographic image formed by two black holes upon a screen 

136: very far away, it is seen that it is impossible for a horizon to hide 

137: behind another.  We also compute the holographic intensity distribution of such an arrangement.

138: \end{abstract}

139: \end{titlepage}

140: \newsection{Introduction}

141: \paragraph{} In 1988 't Hooft made the surprising announcement that 

142: the world had one less dimension than previously believed \cite{tho}.  This 

143: was based on the number of degrees of freedom in a given region of space, 

144: being found not to depend on the volume, as might be naively expected, but 

145: rather on the surface area containing the volume.  Furthermore, this conclusion 

146: connected with one of the few nontrivial combinations of gravity and quantum 

147: field theory, the entropy content of a black hole \cite{bek}.  't Hooft went on to claim that 

148: this idea of dimensional reduction, or ``holography," would need to be 

149: present in any unifying theory.

150: \paragraph{} At the time of 't Hooft's hypothesis string theory was not yet understood at a level that such 

151: a claim could be tested in that area (indeed, Maldacena later found 

152: precisely this feature \cite{malda}).  Susskind was able to show that 

153: this claim had validity in General Relativity \cite{sus};  if it was true that the 

154: entropy density of a surface was maximal on that bounding a black hole, 

155: then this area must expand when projected onto a screen far away.  

156: In this computation we count only the geodesics orthogonal to the screen, 

157: since we are not allowed any information which may depend on the screen's 

158: position; a geodesic which is nonperpendicular to the screen will intersect 

159: in different locations depending on the screen's position.

160: This ``expanding horizon" theory of Susskind was explicitly verified by Corley and Jacobson \cite{cj} for the 

161: single black hole case.  But another observation of Susskind's was that 

162: the information in a second black hole was not allowed to hide behind the 

163: first, with respect to the screen; the geodesics will arrange themselves to 

164: project all information to the screen with non-increasing entropy 

165: density.  Corley and Jacobson quote a magnification factor of the black 

166: hole image at large separation, but no examples were given.  In this paper 

167: we explicitly calculate the geodesics in a two Schwarzschild black hole

168: geometry.  Black hole lensing has been carried out previously 

169: \cite{other1} \cite{other2} but to our knowledge not for two black holes, 

170: which has the novel feature of an arbitrary number of orbits between them 

171: before the photon escapes.  Furthermore, the geometry used easily lends itself to a 

172: calculation of the holographic intensity pattern formed by a uniformly radiating black 

173: hole (the intensity pattern formed keeping only the geodesics 

174: perpendicular to the screen).  We also perform this calculation.

175: \newsection{Single Black Hole}

176: \subsection{Calculation of Orbits}

177: \paragraph{} Beginning with the Schwarzschild black hole metric normalized to $r=1$ at 

178: the horizon,

179: \begin{equation}

180: ds^2 = \left( 1 - \frac{1}{r} \right) dt^2 - \frac{dr^2}{1 - 1/r} - r^2 d 

181: \theta ^2 - r^2 \sin ^2 \theta d \phi^2,

182: \end{equation}

183: the null geodesic equation can be put into the form $(s \equiv 1/r)$

184: \begin{equation}

185: d \phi = \frac{ds}{ \sqrt{b^{-2} - s^2 (1-s) } } 

186: \end{equation}

187: where $b$ is the impact parameter and $\phi$ is the azimuthal angle in the

188: plane of our choosing.  It is most useful to do the 

189: integration ``backward," in the sense that we begin at the screen and track 

190: the geodesic until it has hit the horizon or has deflected away from the 

191: black hole.  We will first work out the case where the geodesic hits the 

192: horizon, then calculate the case where it deflects off one black hole to 

193: hit another.

194: \begin{figure}[t]

195: \begin{center}

196: \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{basic.eps}

197: \caption{A photon approaching a single Schwarzschild black 

198: hole from the screen infinitely far away.}

199: \end{center}

200: \end{figure}

201: \paragraph{}

202: Integrating from $r=\infty$ to $r = 1$ means $s$ goes from 0 to 1.  Using 

203: the photon's incoming line of flight to define $\phi = 0$, we get

204: \begin{equation}

205: \phi (b) = \int ^1 _0 \frac{ds}{ \sqrt{b^{-2} - s^2 (1-s) } }.

206: \end{equation}

207: \paragraph{}

208: The denominator vanishes at $b_c=\frac{3 \sqrt{3}}{2}$, indicating that is the 

209: largest value of $b$ for which we can establish a map between the screen 

210: and the black hole.  Before that, though, the integral (or angle of the 

211: photon upon absorption) goes from 0 to infinity,  implying that there 

212: exists some $b$ for which the photon will orbit around the black hole 

213: indefinitely before finally being absorbed.  Corley and Jacobson \cite{cj} define a 

214: ``covering" to be one complete image of the horizon upon the screen; the 

215: first covering is due to emission from the black hole between $\phi = 0$ and 

216: $\phi = \pi/2$, the second covering from $\phi=\pi/2$ to $\phi = \pi$, as 

217: shown in figure 2.

218: \begin{figure}[t]

219: \begin{center}

220: \includegraphics[scale=0.3]{capture.eps}

221: \caption{Null geodesics showing boundaries of the first few 

222: coverings (left) and the corresponding screen image (right).}

223: \end{center}

224: \end{figure}

225: \paragraph{} We obtained the result found in \cite{cj} that the maximal impact parameter 

226: for the first covering is $b \approx 2.23$; this represents an area of 15.60, larger 

227: than the horizon area $4 \pi \approx 12.57$.  Successive coverings are 

228: smaller than this on the screen.

229: \subsection{Intensity}

230: \paragraph{} We now compute not just the location of the coverings on

231: the screen, but the intensity pattern a ``holographic viewer" would 

232: observe, i.e. a viewer only capable 

233: of observing geodesics perpendicular to the screen.  This is based upon a black 

234: hole radiating uniformly on its surface, then calculating the density of 

235: geodesics orthogonal to the screen.  The first step is to calculate the 

236: angle $\psi$ at which the geodesic hits the black hole,

237: \begin{equation}

238: \left. \tan \psi \right|_{\it surface}= \left. \frac{r}{dr/d \phi} 

239: \right|_{s=1}.

240: \end{equation}

241: For us,

242: \begin{eqnarray}

243: \nonumber

244: \frac{dr}{d \phi} &=& \frac{dr}{ds} \frac{ds}{d \phi}, \\

245: &=& \frac{1}{s^2} \sqrt{b^{-2} - s^2 (1-s) }.

246: \end{eqnarray}

247: \paragraph{} Thus we obtain $\left. \tan \psi \right|_{s=1} = b$. 

248: \begin{figure}[t]

249: \begin{center}

250: \includegraphics[scale=0.2]{angle.eps}

251: \caption{A geodesic will hit the black hole at an angle.}

252: \end{center}

253: \end{figure}

254: \paragraph{}  The intensity of a point on the screen will be the ratio of 

255: geodesic phase space between the screen and the corresponding point on the 

256: black hole, so we must allow our photon to have small variations from 

257: the geodesic path.  We begin with the standard case of a ray leaving 

258: $\psi(b)$ from the normal (see Figure 3) and leaving the BH in the 

259: plane at angle $\phi(b)$; let us now think of $\psi$ as the independent 

260: variable and refer to $\phi(b)$ as $\phi(\psi)$.  The geodesic impacts the 

261: screen at $(x,y,z) = (0, b(\psi), Z) = (0, \tan \psi, Z)$.  Now rotate the 

262: BH clockwise in the z-y plane by angle $\phi (\psi)$, making the ray hit the screen at

263: \begin{equation}

264: \left(

265: \begin{tabular}{c}

266: $x $ \\

267: $y $ \\

268: $z $ 

269: \end{tabular}

270: \right) =

271: \left(

272: \begin{tabular}{ccc}

273: $1$ & $0$ & $0$ \\

274: $0$ & $\cos \phi (\psi) $ & $- \sin \phi (\psi)$  \\

275: $0$ & $\sin \phi (\psi)$ & $\cos \phi (\psi)$

276: \end{tabular}

277: \right)

278: \left(

279: \begin{tabular}{c}

280: $0$ \\

281: $\tan \psi$ \\

282: $Z$ 

283: \end{tabular}

284: \right) 

285: \end{equation}

286: so it appears as though the ray were leaving from the BH on the $z$ axis;  we will 

287: call this transformation $J_1$.  Now rotate 

288: around the z axis so that the ray is leaving at an angle $\theta _2$ from 

289: the y-z plane,

290: \begin{equation}

291: J_2 = \left(

292: \begin{tabular}{ccc}

293: $\cos \theta _2 $ & $- \sin \theta _2 $ & $0$ \\

294: $\sin \theta _2 $ & $\cos \theta _2 $ & $0$ \\

295: $0$ & $0$ & $1$ 

296: \end{tabular}

297: \right).

298: \end{equation}

299: Rotate back by arbitrary $\phi$ in the y-z plane

300: \begin{equation}

301: J_3 = \left(

302: \begin{tabular}{ccc}

303: $1$ & $0$ & $0$ \\

304: $0$ & $\cos \phi $ & $\sin \phi$  \\

305: $0$ & $- \sin \phi$ & $\cos \phi$  

306: \end{tabular}

307: \right).

308: \end{equation}

309: Finally rotate around the z-axis again by arbitrary angle $\theta$,

310: \begin{equation}

311: J_4 = \left(

312: \begin{tabular}{ccc}

313: $\cos \theta $ & $- \sin \theta $ & $0$ \\

314: $\sin \theta $ & $\cos \theta$ & $0$ \\

315: $0$ & $0$ & $1 $ 

316: \end{tabular}

317: \right).

318: \end{equation}

319: Then the final location of the photon is

320: \begin{equation}

321: \left(

322: \begin{tabular}{c}

323: $x $ \\

324: $y $ \\

325: $z $ 

326: \end{tabular}

327: \right) =

328: J_4 J_3 J_2 J_1

329: \left( 

330: \begin{tabular}{c}

331: $0$ \\

332: $\tan \psi$ \\

333: $Z$ 

334: \end{tabular}

335: \right) .

336: \end{equation}

337: Thus we can define our new impact parameter $b' \equiv \sqrt{x^2 + 

338: y^2}$, but clearly upon $\theta = \theta _2 = 0, \phi = \phi(\psi) = \phi (b), \psi = 

339: \psi (b)$ where $b$ is some parameter of our choosing, we recover $b' = b$.  We also take the $Z \rightarrow \infty$ 

340: limit since that is where the screen is.  To compare 

341: the areas of the BH and screen, we compute

342: \begin{eqnarray}

343: \nonumber

344: \left. \frac{d (\cos \phi) \ d \theta}{b' \ db' \ d\theta} \right| _{\theta = \varphi = 0, \phi = \phi (b), \psi = 

345: \psi (b'), b'=b,Z \rightarrow \infty} &=& \left. \frac{\sin \phi}{b'} \left( \frac{db'}{d \phi} \right) ^{-1} \right| _{...} \\

346: \nonumber &=& \left. \frac{\sin \phi}{b'} \left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{x^2 + y^2 }} 

347: \left( x \frac{dx}{d \phi} + y \frac{dy}{d \phi} \right) \right) ^{-1} \right| 

348: _{...} \\

349: \nonumber&=& \left. \frac{\sin \phi (b)}{b} \left( Z + O(1/Z^2) \right) ^{-1} \right| _{z \rightarrow \infty} \\

350: &=& \frac{1}{Z} \frac{\sin \phi (b)}{b} .

351: \end{eqnarray}

352: We now examine at how the photon's tangent vector at the screen changes under these 

353: transformations.  We know it begins hitting the screen perpendicular, and 

354: then will undergo the same transformations as the position vector:

355: \begin{equation}

356: \left(

357: \begin{tabular}{c}

358: $x $ \\

359: $y $ \\

360: $z $ 

361: \end{tabular}

362: \right) =

363: J_4 J_3 J_2 J_1

364: \left( 

365: \begin{tabular}{c}

366: $0$ \\

367: $0$ \\

368: $1$ 

369: \end{tabular}

370: \right) .

371: \end{equation}

372: Now define the angle that it hits the screen at as $\sin \psi'  \equiv 

373: \sqrt{x^2 + y^2}$ and the angle out of the y-z plane as $\tan \varphi  

374: \equiv x/y$.  Then we have the following tangent vector phase space comparison between 

375: the ray leaving the black hole and that hitting the screen:

376: \begin{eqnarray}

377: \nonumber \left. \frac{d (\cos \psi) \ d \theta _2}{d (\cos \psi ') \ d \varphi } 

378: \right|_{...} &=& \left. \frac{ \sin \psi}{ 

379: \sin \psi ' } \left( \frac{d \psi ' }{d \psi} \right)^{-1} \left( \frac{d 

380: \varphi}{d \theta _2} \right)^{-1} \right| _{...}, \\

381: \nonumber &=& \frac{\sin \psi}{\sin \psi ' } \left(  \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - x^2 - y^2 }} \frac{1}{\sqrt{x^2 + y^2 }} 

382: \left( x \frac{dx}{d \psi} + y \frac{dy}{d \psi} \right) 

383: \right)^{-1} ,\\

384: \nonumber &\times& 

385: \left( \frac{1}{1 + (x/y)^2} \left( \frac{1}{y} \frac{dx}{d \theta _2} - 

386: \frac{x}{y^2} \frac{dy}{d \theta _2} \right) \right)^{-1} ,\\

387: \nonumber &=& \frac{b}{\sqrt{1 + b^2} \sin \phi (b) \frac{d \phi (b)}{d \psi} } ,\\

388: \nonumber &=& \frac{b}{\sqrt{1 + b^2} \sin \phi (b) \frac{d \phi (b)}{db} 

389: \frac{db}{d \psi} } , \\

390: &=& \frac{b}{ (1 + b^2)^{3/2} \sin \phi (b) \frac{d \phi (b) }{db} }.

391: \end{eqnarray}

392: \begin{figure}[t]

393: \begin{center}

394: \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{int.eps}

395: \caption{Normalized intensity as a function of impact parameter in a 

396: single black hole.}

397: \end{center}

398: \end{figure}

399: \begin{figure}[t]

400: \begin{center}

401: \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{image.eps}

402: \caption{The intensity pattern formed on the screen due to a 

403: single black hole.}

404: \end{center}

405: \end{figure}

406: Combining the phase-space ratios we get the intensity:

407: \begin{eqnarray}

408: \nonumber I(b) &=& \frac{\textrm{total phase space of rays leaving 

409: BH}}{\textrm{total phase space 

410: of rays hitting screen}} , \\

411: \nonumber &=& \frac{d (\cos \phi) \ d \theta \ d (\cos \psi) \ d \theta _2}{b' \ db' \ 

412: d\theta \ d (\cos \psi ') \ d \varphi} , \\

413: &=& \frac{1}{Z} \frac{1}{ (1 + b^2)^{3/2} \frac{d \phi (b) }{db} }.

414: \end{eqnarray}

415: The result is shown in Figures 4 and 5.  In computing the image we have factored 

416: out the $1/Z$ since this represents the obvious 

417: dependence on distance and we only care about the intensity normalized at 

418: some specific distance. 

419: \newsection{Two Black Holes}

420: \subsection{Calculation of Orbits}

421: \paragraph{} We now use the techniques developed in the previous section 

422: to construct the metric for two black holes; this metric is valid for 

423: large separation between the black holes.  The axes are chosen so 

424: the screen lies in the $x-y$ plane, and the origin is at the position of the 

425: first black hole (the one nearer the screen) with the screen is a very large 

426: distance down the positive $z$ axis.  The second black hole is taken to 

427: lie at the point

428: \begin{equation}

429: BH_2 = (\rho \cos \mu, \rho \sin \mu, -D).

430: \end{equation}

431: We construct the scattering process in reverse by considering photons 

432: emitted in the normal $(-{\hat {\bf z}})$ direction from the screen, track 

433: their geodesics, and pick out those which are absorbed by one of the two 

434: black holes.  Since varying $\mu$ above rotates the picture about the $z$ 

435: axis we consider only photons emitted from points on the screen with 

436: $y=0$.  So the trajectory describing the scattering off the first black 

437: hole lies entirely in the $x-z$ plane.

438: \begin{figure}[t]

439: \begin{center}

440: \includegraphics[scale=0.4]{2BH.eps}

441: \caption{Obtaining the impact parameter for the second black hole.}

442: \end{center}

443: \end{figure}

444: \paragraph{} The photon is emitted at a distance $b_1$ from the $z$ axis.  It is 

445: deflected with angle $\phi (b)$ by the first black hole.  The point $P$ 

446: at which the asymptotes meet is

447: \begin{equation}

448: P = (r \sin \phi, 0, r \cos \phi)

449: \end{equation}

450: where

451: \begin{equation}

452: r = \frac{b}{\sin \phi }

453: \end{equation}

454: as evident from the triangle indicated.  The direction of the deflected 

455: photon (the lower asymptote in the figure) is given by the unit vector

456: \begin{equation}

457: {\bf v} = (\sin 2 \phi , 0, \cos 2 \phi ).

458: \end{equation}

459: Our task is now simply to compute the distance $b_2$ of the line with these 

460: direction cosines passing through the point $P$ from the point $BH_2$.  

461: The photon will be absorbed by the second black hole if $b_2 < b_c$.  

462: \paragraph{} Drawing the line connecting $P$ and $BH_2$, the total length 

463: is $L$ and there is an angle $\epsilon$ with ${\bf v}$, making the answer

464: \begin{equation}

465: b_2 = L \sin \epsilon .

466: \end{equation}

467: The vector ${\bf L}$ joining them is

468: \begin{equation}

469: {\bf L} = BH_2 - P = (\rho \cos \mu - r \sin \phi , \rho \sin \mu, -D - r 

470: \cos \phi)

471: \end{equation}

472: so its length satisfies

473: \begin{equation}

474: L^2 = D^2 + \rho ^2 + r^2 - 2 \rho r \cos \mu \sin \phi + 2 D r \cos \phi.

475: \end{equation}

476: To determine $\epsilon$ we use

477: \begin{equation}

478: \cos \epsilon = \frac{ {\bf L} \cdot {\bf v} }{L}.

479: \end{equation}

480: The inner product is also simple to compute:

481: \begin{eqnarray}

482: \nonumber L \cos \epsilon &=& {\bf L} \cdot {\bf v} =  (\rho \cos \mu - r \sin 

483: \phi ) \sin 2 \phi - (D + r \cos \phi) \cos 2 \phi \\

484: \nonumber &=&  \rho \cos \mu \sin 2 \phi - D \cos 2 \phi - r (\sin \phi \sin 2 

485: \phi + \cos \phi \cos 2 \phi ) \\

486: &=&  \rho \cos \mu \sin 2 \phi - D \cos 2 \phi - r \cos \phi.

487: \end{eqnarray}

488: From these we compute simply

489: \begin{equation}

490: b_2 = L \sin \epsilon = \sqrt{L^2 - (L \cos \epsilon)^2 }.

491: \end{equation}

492: This impact parameter is then fed into our previous calculations for a 

493: single black hole, with appropriate distance normalization due to the mass 

494: of the second black hole; remember in our units 1 = 1 horizon unit, and all 

495: calculations in this geometry were done based on the horizon of the first 

496: black hole.  It is immediately obvious that this procedure can be 

497: generalized to any number of black holes and ``back-and-forth" orbits 

498: between them.  To get a concrete visualization of this process, we show in 

499: Figure 7 the case with $D=10$, $0 \leq \rho \leq 20$.  In Figure 8 we compute 

500: the area of the first covering on the second black hole for $D=10, 0 \leq 

501: \rho \leq 25$.  For this we included only the first-covering area to the 

502: left of the first black hole, as there is a redundency on the right side 

503: and we are only interested in how much area it takes to represent the 

504: whole horizon once.  The hiding theorem is clearly verified, the horizon 

505: expanding even more when it forms a ring.

506: \begin{figure}[t]

507: \begin{center}

508: \includegraphics[scale=0.6]{2bhsol.eps}

509: \caption{Attempted horizon hiding for $D=10,$ $0 \leq \rho \leq 20$.  Gray 

510: represents the geodesic hitting the second black hole, black indicates hitting the first.}

511: \end{center}

512: \end{figure}

513: \begin{figure}[t]

514: \begin{center}

515: \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{2bharea.eps}

516: \caption{The area of the first covering when attempting to 

517: hide.  The lower bar indicates the horizon area $= 4 \pi$, which we need to 

518: be above.  The upper bar indicates the area of the first covering for a 

519: single black hole, which the second black hole must approach at large 

520: separation.}

521: \end{center}

522: \end{figure}

523: \subsection{Intensity}

524: \paragraph{} Thinking about phase space as before, we see that for two black holes the 

525: situation is very similar except we now remember the rays leave the ``real" 

526: screen, deflect off BH1 to form a ``virtual screen," then hit BH2.  Thus

527: \begin{eqnarray}

528: \nonumber I &=& \frac{\textrm{phase space of rays leaving 

529: BH 2 }}{\textrm{phase space 

530: of rays hitting real screen}} ,\\

531: \nonumber &=& \frac{\textrm{PS 

532: of rays leaving BH 2}}{\textrm{PS 

533: of rays hitting virtual screen}} 

534: \frac{\textrm{PS

535: of rays hitting virtual screen}}{\textrm{PS 

536: of rays hitting real screen}} ,\\

537: &=& \frac{1}{ (1 + b_2 ^2)^{3/2} \frac{d \phi (b_2) }{db_2} } 

538: \frac{\textrm{differential area of virtual screen}}{\textrm{differential area 

539: of real screen} }.

540: \end{eqnarray}

541: where the first part is from our previous single BH analysis, and the 

542: second is just comparing the differential area containing the ray on the 

543: virtual screen versus the real screen.  Note that we have omitted the 

544: phase space on the screens due to the tangent vector in this step, but this 

545: is just unity because both screens by definition only take only 

546: perpendicular rays and

547: so have the same tangent phase space.  The ratios of differential areas are 

548: then

549: \begin{equation}

550: \frac{b_2 \ db_2 \ d \kappa}{b_1 \ db_1 \ d \theta}

551: \end{equation}

552: where $\kappa$ is shown in Fig. 6 and $\theta$ is the usual coordinate 

553: around the z axis.  We evaluate this 

554: by switching to cartesian coordinates $(b_1,y)$ for

555: BH2:

556: \begin{equation}

557: b_2 \ db_2 \ d \kappa \rightarrow db_1 \ dy

558: \end{equation}

559: \begin{figure}[t]

560: \begin{center}

561: \includegraphics[scale=0.6]{2bhint.eps}

562: \caption{As a black hole hides behind another, the image becomes very faint.}

563: \end{center}

564: \end{figure}

565: Now see that this yields immediate cancellation with the $b_1$.  As for $dy$, 

566: we see that this point being lifted out of the plane is a distance 

567: $b_{min}$ from the z-axis, thus $dy = b_{min} d \theta$.  The $d \theta$'s 

568: cancel, leaving only $b_{min} / b_1$.  With

569: \begin{equation}

570: b_{min} = b_1 - L \cos \epsilon \sin (2 \phi - \pi)

571: \end{equation}

572: and the expression previously obtained for $L \cos \epsilon$ we 

573: get 

574: \begin{equation}

575: \frac{b_{min}}{b_1} = 1 + \frac{L \cos \epsilon \sin 2 \phi}{b_1}.

576: \end{equation}

577: So the total intensity is just

578: \begin{equation}

579: I = \frac{1}{ (1 + b_2 ^2)^{3/2} \frac{d \phi (b_2) }{db_2} }  \left( 1 + 

580: \frac{L \cos \epsilon \sin 2 \phi (b_1)}{b_1} \right).

581: \end{equation}

582: We now repeat the previous lensing calculation, but including this intensity 

583: profile.  The result is shown in Figure 9.

584: \newsection{Conclusion}

585: \paragraph{} We have verified Susskind's hypothesis that the entropy is 

586: maximal on the surface of a black hole.  We did this for the two black hole case and found that no 

587: entropy-information is lost when one black hole attempts to 

588: hide behind the other.  The holographic intensity of such a configuration was also 

589: calculated.

590: \newsection{Acknowledgements}

591: \paragraph{} The author thanks B. Paczynski, H. Peiris, E. Weinberg, and especially R. Plesser for helpful comments.

592: \begin{thebibliography}{blah}

593: \bi{tho} G. 't Hooft, ``On the  Quantization of Space and Time," in 

594: {\it Quantum Gravity: proceedings}, ed. M.A. Markov, V.A. Berezin, V.P. Frolov 

595: (World Scientific, 1988).

596: \bi{bek} J. D. Bekenstein, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 9} (1974) 3292.

597: \bi{sus} L. Susskind, J. Math. Phys. {\bf 36} (1995) 6377, hep-th/9409089.

598: \bi{malda} J. Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. {\bf 2} (1998) 231, 

599: hep-th/9711200.

600: \bi{cj} S. Corley, T. Jacobson, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 53} (1996) 6720-6724, gr-qc/9602043.

601: \bi{other1} V. Bozza, ``Strong field limit of black hole gravitational 

602: lensing," gr-qc/0102068.

603: \bi{other2} K. S. Virbhadra, ``Schwarzschild black hole lensing," Phys. Rev. 

604: {\bf D} 62 (2000) 084003, astro-ph/9904193

605: \end{thebibliography}

606: 

607: \end{document}

608: