1:
2: \documentclass{ws-p8-50x6-00}
3: \def\rightnote{{\it \ \ Quantum Gravity at the GR16}}
4: \begin{document}
5: \title{GR16: Quantum General Relativity}
6: \author{Carlo Rovelli}
7:
8: \address{Physics Department, University of Pittsburgh, PA-15260, USA\\
9: Centre de Physique Theorique, Luminy, Marseille, F-13288, EU\\
10: E-mail: rovelli@cpt.univ-mrs.fr}
11:
12: \maketitle \abstracts{This is the report of the
13: {\em Quantum General Relativity\/} session, at the 16th International
14: Conference on General Relativity \& Gravitation, held on July 15th to
15: 21st 2001, in Durban, South Africa. This report will appear on the
16: Proceedings of the conference.}
17:
18: \section{Highlights}
19:
20: Current research in quantum gravity is very lively. The research is
21: actively developing both towards the construction of the fundamental
22: theory and towards applications.
23:
24: A large part of the efforts to develop the general theory of the
25: quantum gravitational field is presently concentrated in {\em loop
26: quantum gravity,} in its various forms. The general theory of loop
27: quantum gravity was reviewed at this conference in a plenary talk by
28: Abhay Ashtekar. In the session, several specific aspects of the
29: theory were discussed. The current efforts to understand the low
30: energy behavior of loop quantum gravity were reviewed by Abhay
31: Ashtekar and Jerzy Lewandowski. The covariant spacetime version of
32: the theory, denoted {\em spinfoam\/} theory, and some notable
33: finiteness results due also to Alejandro Perez and Louis Crane were
34: illustrated by myself. Various aspects of the discreteness of the
35: geometry predicted by loop quantum gravity were discussed by Seth
36: Major. Unfortunately, Martin Bojowald had to cancel his participation
37: to the conference at the last minute, and his scheduled communication
38: on his exciting recent results on the application of loop quantum
39: gravity to the initial singularity had to be cancelled. The
40: simplicial approach, whose recent developments were reviewed by Ruth
41: Williams, has also recently converged with loop quantum gravity. In
42: fact, on the one hand the spinfoam formalism include the Barrett Crane
43: simplicial model, on the other hand it can be viewed as the covariant
44: version of (canonical) loop quantum gravity. Altogether, loop
45: quantum gravity appears to be in a very exciting phase of intense
46: development and novel results.
47:
48: Other approaches to quantum gravity were considered in the session as
49: well. In particular: non commutative geometry (Kamesh Wali), the
50: string motivated AdS/CFT theory (Robert Mann), lattice and functional
51: formalisms (Renate Loll).
52:
53: The most studied applications of quantum gravity are in black hole
54: physics, gravitational collapse, and cosmological models. The
55: application of quantum gravity to gravitational collapse is a long
56: studied problem. A new and rather surprising results presented by
57: Peter H\'aj{\'\i}\v cek, obtained via a careful hamiltonian analysis
58: of the problem came therefore as a surprise: a shell bounces and
59: re-expands, and the singularity disappears. The collapse problem was
60: discussed also by Mike Ryan, Cenalo Vaz and Valentin Gladush.
61:
62: The most characteristic physical system for quantum gravity is
63: certainly the quantum black hole. There are now two well-known
64: derivations of the Bekenstein-Hawking black hole entropy from a
65: complete quantum gravity theory, obtained respectively within string
66: theory and within loop quantum gravity. But a complete physical
67: understanding of the quantum black hole thermal behavior is not yet
68: available, and the problem keeps raising interest. The problem was
69: discussed in the session by Steven Carlip, Gabor Kunstatter and Louis
70: Witten. Finally, a cosmological model with a perfect fluid was discussed by
71: Julio Fabris.
72:
73: I'll now illustrate all the contributions to the session in more
74: detail.
75:
76: \section{General theory: loop quantum gravity}
77:
78: \begin{description}
79:
80: \item[\em Abhay Ashtekar: ``Semiclassical issues in nonperturbative QG" ]
81: Ashtekar discussed the use of a detailed mathematical theory of
82: quantum geometry, in order to analyze the fundamental discreteness of
83: spacetime predicted by loop quantum gravity. This discreteness makes
84: it difficult to relate the underlying `polymer excitations' of quantum
85: geometry to the Fock states normally used in low energy physics. To
86: bridge this gap, using some recent results of Varadarajan, Ashtekar
87: and Lewandowski have located, analyzed and used Minkowskian Fock
88: states in the background independent framework. The fundamental
89: discreteness is lost in the standard semi-classical description
90: because Fock states constitute only a small subset of all
91: non-perturbative states. While the quantum geometry operators have
92: purely discrete eigenvalues in the full theory, none of these
93: eigenvectors belong to the Fock space. This framework is well-suited
94: to address two key questions: Can the background-independent,
95: non-perturbative theory reproduce the familiar low-energy physics on,
96: say, suitable coarse graining? and, Can one pin-point where and why
97: perturbation theory fails? Ashtekar described work in progress on
98: both these fronts.
99:
100: \item[\em Carlo Rovelli: ``Spin foam models" ] A spin foam model can be
101: seen as the covariant, or Feynman integral, version of a loop quantum
102: gravity theory. A spin foam represents a four-geometry and the model
103: is formulated as a sum over these four-geometries. Remarkably, there
104: is a duality between these models and certain particular field
105: theories defined on group manifolds (Group Field Theory, or GFT). The
106: sum over spin foam can be generated as the Feynman perturbative
107: expansion of the GFT. Each spacetime appears therefore as the Feynman
108: graph of the auxiliary GFT theory. This phenomenon is a 4d analog of
109: a phenomenon first noticed in 2d quantum gravity, or ```zero
110: dimensional string theory", where the spacetime could be obtained as
111: Feynman graphs of an auxiliary matrix model. The main result
112: presented is that (up to certain degenerate terms) the theory is {\em
113: finite\/} order by order in the perturbation expansion. This allows
114: finite three-geometry to three-geometry transition amplitudes to be
115: perturbatively computed explicitly in the physical, lorentzian, 4d
116: theory.
117:
118: \item[\em Seth Major: ``Discrete geometry" ] Major presented recent
119: results on the spectra of the angle, area, and volume operators,
120: including limits placed on the level of discreteness by semiclassical
121: behavior and classic tests of fundamental physics.
122:
123: \item[\em Ruth Williams: ``Progress in discrete quantum gravity" ]
124: Approaches to discrete quantum gravity include sums over histories
125: using the simplicial analogue of the Einstein action formulated by
126: Regge, and state sum models, such as the Ponzano-Regge and Turaev-Viro
127: models in three dimensions and the Barrett-Crane model in four
128: dimensions. There has been a remarkable convergence with the loop
129: quantum gravity approach, in recent years. Williams described
130: progress with simplicial and state sum models, including a discrete
131: version of the calculation of the ground state wave function for
132: linearized gravity, and an investigation of perturbations of
133: three-dimensional state sum models.
134:
135: \end{description}
136:
137: \section{General theory: others}
138: \begin{description}
139:
140: \item[\em Kamesh Wali: ``Action functionals on a two-sheeted spacetime" ]
141: Wali proposes a model of left- and right- chiral fields living on the
142: two-sheeted space-time along with two distinct gauge fields, within
143: the framework of non-commutative geometry. The mathematics presented
144: generalizes the fundamental concepts of Riemannian geometry, such as
145: differential forms, connection and curvature. The model has a rich
146: and complex structure with new interaction terms to be explored. One
147: of them is a parity violating interaction arising from the
148: gravitational sector of their generalized theory.
149:
150: \item[\em Robert Mann: ``Conserved quantities in AdS/CFT" ] The talk
151: reported on work concerning the problem of defining conserved charges
152: in gravitational theory. This is a long-standing problem in general
153: relativity -- the equivalence principle implies that locally gravity
154: cannot be distinguished from acceleration, and the problem of defining
155: a local measure of gravitational energy and angular momentum has
156: remained elusive. A reasonable measure of success has been attained
157: in recent years using the Brown/York quasilocal formalism, which
158: proposes a definition of conserved quantities enclosed by a $(d-2)$
159: surface in $d$ dimensions. A generic problem with the quasilocal
160: formalism is that the conserved quantities typically diverge as the
161: mean radial size of the enclosed surface becomes infinite. A recent
162: proposal inspired by the AdS/CFT correspondence offers a potential
163: resolution to this difficulty. This conjectured correspondence states
164: that a quantum theory of gravity whose boundary conditions are the
165: same as those of asymptotically anti de Sitter (AdS) spacetime is in
166: 1-1 correspondence with a quantum conformal field theory (CFT) defined
167: on the boundary of this spacetime. Quantum field theories generically
168: have counterterms, and the correspondence suggests that these
169: counterterms should be geometric invariants of the induced metric on
170: the boundary at infinity. Employing this proposal, Mann computed the
171: energy, angular momentum and entropy of spacetimes containing rotating
172: black holes with NUT charge (ie in the general Kerr-NUT-anti de Sitter
173: class). He found in all cases that the conserved quantities were
174: finite. No reference spacetime was required at any stage of the
175: calculation. He then showed how to extend this prescription to
176: asymptotically flat spacetimes, and obtained corresponding results
177: that are finite. The interpretation of these quantities in
178: spacetimes with NUT charge is still obscure.
179:
180: \item[\em Renate Loll: ``The conformal factor problem" ] Under certain
181: assumption on the behavior of the partition function under
182: renormalization, one finds the interesting result that the well known
183: divergence due to the conformal modes is cancelled by a Faddeev-Popov
184: determinant. This result confirms that absence of the conformal
185: sickness noticed by Loll in the lorentzian lattice models.
186:
187: \end{description}
188:
189:
190: \section{Gravitational collapse}
191:
192: \begin{description}
193: \item[\em Peter H\'aj{\'\i}\v cek: ``Gravitational collapse" ]
194: H\'aj{\'\i}\v cek studies the quantum dynamics of a self-gravitating
195: null shell for the spherically symmetric case, using only gauge
196: invariant quantities (Dirac observables). The definition of evolution
197: is based on an asymptotically non-trivial symmetry of the model (time
198: translation element of the BMS group). H\'aj{\'\i}\v cek proves in
199: particular, that a version of quantum theory exists, in which the
200: shell bounces and re-expands, and in which the singularity disappears.
201: The quantum metric outside the shell contains a time-dependent mixture
202: of black and white holes. These remarkable and surprising results
203: raised much interest and a lively discussion, in the session.
204:
205: \item[\em Michael Ryan: ``Quantum collapse of dust shell: solutions" ]
206: A hamiltonian formulation of the problem of the collapse of a dust
207: shell given by H\'aj{\'\i}\v cek and Kijowski and Kucha\v r allows one
208: to study the the minisuperspace problem of the quantum collapse of a
209: spherically symmetric dust shell, albeit with a very complicated
210: Hamiltonian operator. Ryan presented both analytic approximate
211: solutions and exact numerical solutions to the problem. Since the
212: solutions involve only geometrical variables defined on the shell, it
213: is necessary to reconstruct the quantum spacetime geometry around the
214: shell (possible in this special spherically symmetric case) in order
215: to discuss the interpretation of the solutions in terms of spacetime
216: geometry, especially the position of the shell with respect to
217: horizons. This allowed Ryan to consider the quantum evolution of the
218: shell in spacetime.
219:
220: \item[\em Cenalo Vaz: ``LeMaitre-Tolman-Bondi collapse" ] Vaz applied the
221: Kuchar transformation to LeMaitre-Tolman-Bondi models of inhomogeneous
222: dust collapse. Dirac's constraint quantization leads to a simple
223: Wheeler-DeWitt equation with a general mass function. A solution was
224: presented over the entire class of models considered. These solutions
225: cover collapse into both black holes and naked singularities (up to
226: the Cauchy Horizon) and can be employed in the study of quantum
227: gravitational effects in the final stages of collapse with different
228: initial conditions as well as, it is hoped, in the study of
229: inhomogeneous cosmologies.
230:
231: \item[\em Valentin Gladush: ``Quasiclassical spherical
232: configuration" ] Gladush has considered a quasi-classical model of
233: self-gravitating spherical dust shell, and studied the energy
234: spectrum using quasi-classical quantization rules, and the stability
235: of the system.
236:
237: \end{description}
238:
239: \section{Black holes}
240: \begin{description}
241: \item[\em Steven Carlip: ``Boundary conditions, constraints, BH entropy" ]
242: Recent work by a number of authors has suggested that black hole
243: entropy may have a microscopic description in terms of a boundary
244: conformal field theory, living either near the horizon or at spatial
245: infinity. Carlip described a new approach to boundary conditions near
246: such a boundary, in which the fall-off requirements are introduced as
247: a set of second class constraints that modify the algebra of
248: diffeomorphisms. For Liouville theory in a dynamical background, this
249: approach leads to the standard central charge; for dilaton gravity,
250: the result is a Virasoro algebra with a classical central charge of
251: the form required to explain the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy.
252:
253: \item[\em Gabor Kunstatter: ``Quantum Mechanics of Charged BHs" ]
254: Basic properties of black hole thermodynamics were used to quantize
255: generic charged black holes in the Euclidean sector. The analysis led
256: to a discrete spectrum for the horizon area that is qualitatively
257: consistent with the results of Bekenstein, Mukhanov and others, but
258: different from the spectrum predicted by loop quantum gravity. In
259: particular, the area spectrum was shown generically to be equally
260: spaced. Quantization of the charge sector gave the condition $Q=me$,
261: for integer $m$, as expected, but a consistency condition constrained
262: the fine structure constant $e^2/\hbar$ to be a rational number. Near
263: extremal black holes were shown to be highly quantum objects.
264: Moreover, with a standard choice of factor ordering, extremal black
265: holes did not appear in the physical spectrum at all.
266:
267: \item[\em Louis Witten: ``BH Quantization in Canonical Gravity" ]
268: Witten started from the observation that the Schwarzschild black hole
269: can be viewed as a special case of the marginally bound
270: LeMaitre-Tolman-Bondi models of dust collapse corresponding to a
271: constant mass function. Using a midi-superspace quantization of the
272: collapse for an arbitrary mass function illustrated in this same
273: session by C Vaz, Witten showed that the solution leads both to
274: Bekensteins’s area spectrum for black holes as well as to the black
275: hole entropy. In this context, the entropy is naturally interpreted
276: as the loss of information of the original matter distribution within
277: the collapsing cloud.
278:
279: \end{description}
280:
281: \section{Finite dimensional models}
282:
283: \begin{description}
284:
285: \item[\em Julio Fabris: ``Quantum cosmological perfect fluid" ] Fabris
286: quantized the gravity-perfect fluid system, employing the Schutz's
287: formalism. The matter degrees of freedom allow to recover the notion
288: of time. Wave-functions are obtained in closed form, in the
289: mini-superspace, and the expectation value for the scale factor is
290: computed, yielding a singularity-free, bouncing Universe. He showed
291: that these results are recovered by a classical system where, besides
292: the ordinary matter employed in the quantization procedure, a
293: universal repulsive fluid with a stiff matter equation of state is
294: added.
295:
296: \end{description}
297: \end{document}
298:
299: