1: \documentstyle[12pt,fleqn]{article}
2: \textheight 9.0in
3: \topmargin -0.5in
4: \input epsf
5: \textwidth 6.5in
6: \oddsidemargin -0.1in
7: \def\singlespace {\smallskipamount=3.75pt plus1pt minus1pt
8: \medskipamount=7.5pt plus2pt minus2pt
9: \bigskipamount=15pt plus4pt minus4pt
10: \normalbaselineskip=15pt plus0pt minus0pt
11: \normallineskip=1pt
12: \normallineskiplimit=0pt
13: \jot=3.75pt
14: {\def\smallskip {\vskip\smallskipamount}}
15: {\def\medskip {\vskip\medskipamount}}
16: {\def\bigskip {\vskip\bigskipamount}}
17: {\setbox\strutbox=\hbox{\vrule
18: height10.5pt depth4.5pt width 0pt}}
19: \parskip 7.5pt
20: \normalbaselines}
21:
22: \def\doublespace {\smallskipamount=7.5pt plus2pt minus2pt
23: \medskipamount=15pt plus4pt minus4pt
24: \bigskipamount=30pt plus8pt minus8pt
25: \normalbaselineskip=30pt plus0pt minus0pt
26: \normallineskip=2pt
27: \normallineskiplimit=0pt
28: \jot=7.5pt
29: {\def\smallskip {\vskip\smallskipamount}}
30: {\def\medskip {\vskip\medskipamount}}
31: {\def\bigskip {\vskip\bigskipamount}}
32: {\setbox\strutbox=\hbox{\vrule
33: height21.0pt depth9.0pt width 0pt}}
34: \parskip 15.0pt
35: \normalbaselines}
36: \def\be{\begin{equation}}
37: \def\ee{\end{equation}}
38: \def\bea{\begin{eqnarray}}
39: \def\eea{\end{eqnarray}}
40: \def\nn{\nonumber}
41: \def\th{\theta}
42: \def\ph{\phi}
43: \def\lt{\left}
44: \def\rt{\right}
45: \def\sect #1{\setcounter{equation}{0}}
46: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{equation}}
47: \begin{document}
48: \singlespace
49: \doublespace
50:
51: \centerline {\Large{Naked Singularity, Black-hole and the Mass
52: Loss in a }}
53: \centerline {\Large{Spherically Symmetric Gravitational Collapse }}
54:
55: \vspace{12pt}
56:
57:
58:
59:
60: \centerline{I H Dwivedi$^{*}$}
61: \centerline{21, Ballabhji Vihar, Dayalbagh, Agra, India}
62:
63: \vspace{0.4in}
64: \vspace{2in}
65:
66: PACS numbers: 04.20.Cv, 04.20.Dw
67: \vspace{0.4in}
68:
69:
70: \noindent $*$\\
71: \noindent E-Mail Address:idwivedi@sancharnet.in;
72: dwivedi@tifr.res.in
73:
74:
75:
76: \newpage
77:
78: \vspace{1.3in}
79:
80:
81: \begin{abstract}
82: A distinguishable physical property between a naked singularity
83: and a black-hole, formed during a gravitational collapse has
84: important implications for both experimental and theoretical
85: relativity. We examine the energy radiated during the spherically
86: symmetric Gravitational collapse in this context within the
87: framework of general relativity. It is shown that total energy
88: radiated( Mass Loss) during the collapse ending in a naked
89: singularity scenario cannot be more than the case when a collapse
90: scenario ends in a black-hole. In cases of interest(for example
91: stars having same mass, size, and internal composition) considered
92: here the total energy released in the collapse ending in a black
93: hole can be considerably more than the case otherwise.
94:
95:
96:
97: \end{abstract}
98:
99:
100: \newpage \section{Introduction}
101: The universe is full of supper high energy events. For example
102: quasars(and other active galactic nuclei) radiating $10^3$ times
103: more than the luminosity of a galaxy, supernova explosions
104: emitting huge amounts of energy within a few days to a year and
105: gamma ray bursts which radiate energy of the order of
106: $10^{51}$-$10^{54}$ ergs within a duration of few milliseconds to
107: few seconds. Despite numerous attempts, an ideal explanation is yet
108: to be found. It is, however, widely believed that probably
109: gravitational collapse is responsible for such events and that
110: during a dynamic collapse huge amount of energy would be released,
111: possibly due to the conversion of the rest mass of the star into
112: energy. A gravitational collapse
113: occurs when a star with sufficient mass has exhausted its nuclear
114: fuel. As this stellar collapse progresses further, gravitational
115: forces become very strong resulting in the development of closed
116: trapped surfaces. The development of this surface signals the
117: formation of a region of space time from where no causal particles
118: could escape. According to singularity theorems a space time
119: singularity must develop generically during a gravitational
120: collapse specially once a trapped surface develops. These
121: theorems, however do not say any thing about the nature of such
122: singularities and its physical properties.
123:
124: With the advent of cosmic censorship conjecture (CCH)and
125: subsequent development of Black-hole physics, efforts have been
126: devoted over the last two decades on the study of the dynamics of
127: a gravitational collapse of physically reasonable matter in the
128: context of CCH. Conclusions from these are that singularities both
129: naked and covered would form generically during the collapse(see
130: \cite {D1,D2,D3} and the references therein). The implication of
131: these studies is that even if the collapse produces unbounded
132: curvature and density, trapped surface may not develop early to
133: prevent the exposure of the singular regions to an outside
134: observer.
135:
136: Considerable work has appeared in the literature which attribute
137: these high energy events(for example gamma ray bursts) in the
138: cosmos to the formation and existence of a naked singularity
139: during the gravitational collapse ( See \cite{j1,j2} and further
140: references therein). The suggestion is that contrary to the black
141: hole scenario, in case of naked singularity, the high curvature
142: region of the space time( where the naked singularity is formed)
143: is open to the outside and therefore energy of this region some
144: how (either due to quantum particle production\cite {j2,j3} or
145: formation of a compact fireball \cite {j1})would lead to the high
146: energy emission from the vicinity of the naked singularity and
147: onward to the outside world. This is quite natural and one would
148: expect that since an extra high curvature region of the space time
149: with extreme conditions is available to radiate energy in the case
150: of a naked singularity, the energy released should be more than
151: the case of a black hole. Thus this could also possibly be a
152: observable signature of naked singularity.
153:
154: Based on CCH Black-hole physics has developed significantly.
155: Similarly could the formation of a naked singularity also signal a
156: physical phenomena responsible for huge amounts of energy release.
157: An important aspect is whether the occurrence of a singularity(
158: naked or otherwise) is just a mathematical problem due to the
159: mathematical structure of the field equations or do they have a
160: deeper physical meaning?. Investigation, therefore, of the two
161: scenarios namely naked singularity and black-hole from the
162: perspective of the total mass loss(energy radiated) during the
163: gravitational collapse is of theoretical interest in it's own
164: right in general relativity. Moreover is there a distinguishable
165: difference between the amount of energy released during a collapse
166: process which is ending either as a black hole or a naked
167: singularity under similar conditions. The implication of such a
168: study within the framework of general relativity could not be
169: overemphasized.
170:
171: We make such an attempt in this paper and consider spherically
172: symmetric gravitational collapse from the point of view of
173: examining the energy radiated(Mass Loss) during the collapse
174: ending in a singularity within the framework of general
175: relativity. We calculate the remnant mass of the collapsing star
176: which is shown to be related to the initial mass and the initial
177: pressure at the boundary of the star. It is then shown that the
178: total energy radiated in the model of a collapsing star considered
179: here can be same for both end states(naked singularity or black
180: hole) i.e. One can have, for equal amount of energy radiated
181: during the collapse, different sets of parameters at the onset of
182: collapse leading the star either to a naked singularity or a black
183: hole. Thus a naked singularity scenario in general would not
184: radiate more energy than a black hole scenario. An equally
185: important result is that for two stars having the same mass, size,
186: and the internal structure, the star ending in a black hole would
187: suffer a greater mass loss then its counterpart that is naked
188: singularity.
189:
190: Here is the summary of what we intend to do and how we organize
191: rest of our paper. We would of course consider the collapse
192: scenario within the framework of classical general relativity. A
193: typical scenario involves a massive star on a continuous
194: gravitational collapse starting at some time $t=t_i$. In the next
195: section we therefore consider such a spherically symmetric matter
196: cloud representing type I matter field \cite{D4}. The radiating
197: Vaidya space time describes the space-time outside the moving
198: boundary of such a collapsing star. The conditions on the initial
199: density etc. are then examined for the collapse to end either as
200: a black-hole or a globally naked singularity. Next in the section
201: on Mass Loss we discuss the mass function in Vaidya space-time and
202: it's relation to the interior parameters. The remnant mass of the
203: star is then calculated in terms of mass, density and pressure of
204: the star at the onset of collapse. In appendix A we discuss the
205: interior matter field in the context of field equations and energy
206: conditions. Appendix B is devoted to the star model and the
207: boundary conditions.
208:
209: \newpage
210: \section{The Collapsing Star}
211:
212: Despite the numerous exact solutions of the field equations, very
213: few describe a physically reasonable collapsing matter cloud. In
214: fact in nearly all the studies of spherically symmetric collapse,
215: Tolman-Bondi-Lemitre metric(TBL) \cite{TBL} has been used
216: extensively and very well may be the only reasonable exact
217: solution available. While dust is a possible equation of state
218: describing late stages of collapse \cite{Pen}, it is an idealized
219: form of matter with vanishing pressure . Total mass enclosed in
220: the dust cloud is time independent(Exterior space-time is
221: Schwarzschild) and no energy is radiated during such a collapse.
222: We therefore consider a general matter field with non vanishing
223: pressures.
224: The metric describing a spherically symmetric space-time is
225: given by
226: \be
227: ds^2= -dt^2 +{R'^2\over 1+f}dr^2 + R^2d\Omega^2,
228: \ee
229: where
230: $d\Omega^2=d\theta^2+\sin^2\theta d\phi^2$, $R=R(t,r)$ and
231: $f=f(t,r)$ are arbitrary functions of $t$ and $r$. The metric in
232: (1) has to satisfy field equations which can be put in a better
233: form if we put
234: \be
235: \dot R^2=f+{F\over R}\Rightarrow \dot R=-\sqrt{f+{F\over R}}
236: \ee
237: $F=F(t,r)$, $R=R(t,r)$ and $f(t,r)>-1$ are $C^2$ functions of $t$
238: and $r$ throughout the cloud. Notation (') and $(^.)$ are used to
239: denote partial differentiation with respect to $r$ and $t$.
240: $F=F(t,r)$ is interpreted as the mass function and for physical
241: reasons $F(t,r)\ge 0$, $F'(t,r)\ge 0$. $f(t,r)$ may be interpreted
242: as total energy and classifies the space time as bound, marginally
243: bound and unbounded as per $f<0$, $f=0$ and $f>0$. For collapse
244: $\dot R <0$. $R(t,r)$ is called the area radius in the sense that
245: $4\pi R^2(t,r)$ gives the proper area of the mass shells for a
246: given value of coordinate $r$ at time $t$ and the area of such a
247: shell vanishes when $R(t,r)=0$. In this sense curve $t=t(r)$ such
248: that $R(t(r),r)=0$ describe the singularity in the space-time
249: where mass shells collapse to zero volume and where curvatures
250: diverge. To avoid shell crossing we would require $R'>0$. The
251: specification of arbitrary functions $F$ and $f$ gives a
252: particular solution of the field equations, for example $F=F(r)$,
253: $f=f(r)$ gives the TBL models. (For the metric (1) satisfying
254: field equations in general see Appendix A.)
255:
256: Our intentions and aim in this paper are certainly not to find
257: another exact solution of the field equations prescribing a
258: particular matter field satisfying a particular equation of state,
259: but to investigate within the framework of general relativity mass
260: loss when physically allowed reasonable evolution develop into a
261: singularity naked or covered. The answer to the problem would have
262: been simple if we had at our disposal both an exact closed
263: equation of state describing the state of a collapsing matter and
264: an exact solution of the field equation. However both of these are
265: little understood in highly dense regions in relativity. Dust
266: solutions being an exact solution has been widely used for
267: investigating the occurrence of naked singularities and black
268: holes(see \cite{D1} and references therein), however as pointed
269: out earlier it is of limited use in the context of our work here.
270: We therefore consider a general physically reasonable matter field
271: (i.e. type I matter fields) satisfying energy conditions. Let us
272: consider matter cloud given by
273: \be
274: f(t,r)=-f_0(r)+f_1(t,r),\quad F(t,r)= F_0(r) - f_1(t,r)R \ee Where
275: $F_0(r)\ge 0, f_0(r)\ge 0$ and $f_1(t,r)\ge 0$ are functions which
276: are $C^2$ throughout the matter cloud. For type I fields
277: satisfying energy conditions it follows (For details of the
278: solution for such a consideration in equation (3), including
279: energy conditions etc. see Appendix A.)
280: \be
281: F_0'\ge f_1'R, 1>f_0-f_1\ge 0,\quad\dot F\le 0,\quad F_0'\ge 0 \ee
282: Because of equation (3) equation (2) now reads
283: \be
284: \dot R=\sqrt{-f_0+{F_0\over R}}
285: \ee
286:
287: We now elaborate on equation (3) and such a particular choice.
288: First note that in case $f_1(t,r)=0$ the space-time given in
289: metric (1) reduces to TBL dust models. The structure of
290: differential equation (5) determining $R(t,r)$ remains as in dust
291: case implying same functional dependence of $R(t,r)$ as a function
292: of $t$ and $r$ as in dust. The metric in (1)is therefore similar
293: to TBL model except for the extra term $f_1$ in
294: $f=f_0(r)-f_1(t,r)$ appearing in the denominator of the $g_{rr}$
295: term in the metric. The requirement that the space-time be
296: singularity free, in the sense that Kritchmann
297: scalar, principle density and pressures etc. do not diverge prior
298: to the formation of shell focusing singularity, implies
299: $f_1=r^nh(t,r),n\ge 2$ with $h(t,r)$ being at least $C^2$
300: function. Therefore the analysis regarding the formation of a
301: naked singularity or a black-hole in the gravitational collapse
302: for such a model remains similar to dust case. The advantage of
303: such a consideration is that while the analysis and conditions for
304: occurrence of singularity either naked or covered would be same as
305: dust, we now have in the space time a type I matter field
306: satisfying energy conditions with non vanishing pressures and
307: which could be matched to Vaidya space-time out side the star.
308:
309: The dust models have been extensively investigated for occurrence
310: of singularities naked and otherwise. Because of the relevance of
311: dust models to our work we give, before a general consideration, a
312: very brief account of dust solutions and use the needed results
313: while referring the
314: reader to articles in literature for details \cite{D1}. By
315: suitably scaling coordinate $r$ at time $t=0$(when the collapse
316: starts) such that $R(0,r)=r$, we get from equation (5)
317: \be
318: t-t_0(r)=-{R^{3/2}\over \sqrt{F_0}}G({R\over r}),
319: \ee
320: \be
321: G(y)={\arcsin{\sqrt{y}}\over y^{3/2}}-{\sqrt{1-y}\over y},
322: G(0)={2\over 3},\quad t_0(r)= {\pi r^{3/2}\over 2\sqrt{F_0}}
323: \ee
324: Where we have used the fact that for the mass shells to start from
325: rest at $t=0$ $\dot R(0,r)=0\Rightarrow F_0(r)=rf_0(r)$. For
326: physical reasons we have restricted ourselves to bound cases only
327: that is $0\ge f>-1$ throughout. In order to avoid shell crossing
328: we require $t_0'(r)\ge 0$. The function $f_0(r)=f_cr^2g(r),g(0)>0$
329: is such that $g(r)$ is at least $C^2$ function of $r$ throughout.
330: This ensures that there are no singularities in the space-time
331: prior to the formation of first singularity at the center $r=0$
332: which occurs at time $t=t_s=t_0(0)$ such that $R(t_s,0)=0$. Only
333: the first central singularity could be naked while all other for
334: $r>0$ are necessarily covered. The central shell focusing
335: singularity is globally naked if \cite{D1}
336: \be
337: {3\pi f_c\over 4f_{co}^{3/2}}>13+{15\sqrt{3}\over 2}
338: \ee
339: Where $f_c>0$ and $f_{co}\ge 0$ are constants given by
340: \be
341: f_0(r)=f_cr^2g(r)=f_cr^2(1-f_{co}r^3 + r^4f_{01}(r)) ,
342: \ee
343: $f_{01}(r)$ being $C^2$ differentiable function throughout the
344: dust cloud. In general $f_0(r)/r^2$ would have terms of the order
345: of $r$ and $r^2$ as well, however the resulting naked singularity
346: is gravitationally weak \cite{D1}. For occurrence of strong
347: curvature singularity $f_0(r)$ must have the form in equation (9).
348: If the condition in equation (8) is not satisfied than the
349: singularity is covered (i.e. black hole).
350:
351: Let us now consider a general scenario. If the spherically
352: symmetric star considered above is to radiate energy the most
353: general external metric is Vaidya space time
354: \be
355: ds^2= -(1-{2m(u)\over {\bf r}})du^2 -2dud{\bf r}+ {\bf
356: r}^2d\Omega^2,
357: \ee
358: where the arbitrary function $m(u)$ of the
359: retarded time $u$ represent the mass of the system out side the
360: star. The Matching conditions are given in equations (29) to
361: (33)(see appendix B for details). The motion of the boundary in
362: Vaidya space-time is given by ${\bf r}=R(t(u),r_b)$ Equation (32)
363: relates retarded time $u$ to time $t$ . At $t=0, u=u_i$ and as
364: $t\rightarrow t_{ah}, u\rightarrow \infty$, $t_{ah}$ is the time
365: when the outermost shell at $r=r_b$ meets the
366: apparent horizon $R(t_{ah},r_b)=F(t_{ah},r_b)$. Using equation (3) and
367: (29) we have
368: \be
369: F_0(r_b)-f_1(t,r_b)R(t,r_b)=2m(u),
370: \ee
371: The matching of the two space-time across the boundary $r=r_b$
372: restricts the function $f_1(t,r)$ to the form given in equation
373: (33) and we have for $f_(t,r_b)$
374: \be
375: f_1(t,r_b)={4c(r_b)(1-f_0(r_b))\exp({2Y_0(r_b)
376: \arccos(\sqrt{{R(t,r_b)\over r_b}})}) \over
377: (1-c(r_b)\exp({2Y_0(r_b)\arccos(\sqrt{{R(t,r_b)\over r_b}})}))^2}
378: \ee
379: where functions $c(r), Y_0(r)$ are related to initial pressure
380: $p_r(r)$ and $p_{\theta}(r)$(see appendix A) via equations (27) and (28)
381: $f_0(r)$ is an
382: important quantity in our calculations and we get from
383: equations (27) and (11)
384: \be
385: f_0=r^2p_r+{2M(r)\over r},\quad 2M(r)=k\int{\rho r^2 dr}
386: \ee
387: \be
388: f_0(r_b)={2m_0\over r_b}+ kr_b^2p_r(r_b),\quad m_0=M(r_b)=m(0)
389: \ee
390: where the initial density $\rho\ge 0$ and pressure $ p_r\ge 0$ and
391: $p_{\theta}\ge 0$ are $C^2$ functions throughout the cloud. For
392: physical reasonableness we require that
393: $\rho'\le 0, p_r'\le 0, p_{\theta}'\le 0$.
394: Thus we now have a matter cloud with non vanishing
395: pressures and where the space out side the collapsing star is
396: described by the Vaidya space time. The mass function $m(u)$ is
397: related to initial density and pressures of interior matter cloud
398: making it possible to examine mass loss and that is precisely what
399: we look for in the next section.
400:
401: \newpage \section{Mass Loss}
402:
403: Prior to the onset of collapse the star might appear to be a
404: normal radiating star to an outside observer receiving radiation
405: at some rate. These radiation could have been coming for a long
406: time in the past as they do in most cases. Our interest here,
407: however, is only to estimate the energy radiated (mass loss)
408: once the collapse starts.
409:
410: The exterior metric Out side the moving boundary ${\bf
411: r}=R(t(u),r_b)$ is given by Vaidya metric. Thus the star with
412: radius $r=r_b$ at the onset of collapse at $t=0$ continues
413: radiating till the outermost shell given by $r=r_b$ meets the
414: surface $R=F$. Actually the surface $R=F$ is characterized as
415: apparent horizon and represent the boundary beyond which all
416: causal particles are ingoing. From equation (32)it
417: follows that as $R(t,r_b)\rightarrow F(t,r_b)$
418: $u\rightarrow\infty$ thus while the time $t$ is finite for an
419: inside observer, an out side observer would take infinite
420: amount of time for the surface of the star to reach the apparent
421: horizon. 0nce the boundary of the star meets the apparent horizon
422: there would not be any out going radiation. This is the stage at
423: which the remaining mass of the collapsing cloud disappears into
424: the black hole and becomes the mass of the black hole.
425: The mass of the star at the onset of collapse is given by equation
426: (14). we have
427: \be
428: x_0={2m_0\over r_b}=E_0-T_0,\quad E_0=f_0(r_b),\quad T_0
429: =kr_b^2p_r(r_b)
430: \ee
431: $x_0$ actually is the ratio of the Schwarzschild radius $2m_0$ of
432: the star with mass $m_o$ at the onset of collapse, to the radius
433: of the star $r_b$. At the time $t=0$ the boundary of the star
434: $r=r_b$ starts collapsing. The star continues to radiate till
435: its boundary $r=r_b$ meets the apparent horizon $R=F$ at time
436: $t=t_{ah}$ which is given by
437: \be
438: R(t_{ah},r_b)=F(t_{ah},r_b)
439: \ee
440: Using equations (3)
441: \be
442: 1+f_1(t_{ah},r_b)={f_0(r_b)\over R(t_{ah},r_b)}
443: \ee Using
444: equations (3), (11) to (16) and eliminating $c(r_b)$ by using
445: equation (27) we get
446: \be
447: {\sqrt{1-x_0}-\sqrt{1-E_0}\over \sqrt{1-x_0}+\sqrt{1-E_0}}={
448: \sqrt{E_0(1-x_s)}-\sqrt{x_s(1-E_0)}\over \sqrt{E_0(1-x_s)}+\sqrt{x_s(1-E_0)}}
449: \exp(-2y_0\arccos(\sqrt{x_s}))
450: \ee
451: where we have put
452: \be
453: x_s={2m_r\over r_b}={2m(\infty)\over r_b},\quad y_0=\sqrt{{1-E_0\over E_0}}
454: \quad {x_s\over x_o}={m_r\over m_o}
455: \ee
456: $2m_r=F(t_{ah},r_b)=2m(\infty)$ is the remnant mass of the star.
457: The above equation relates final mass
458: of the collapsing cloud to the initial mass of the star at the
459: onset of collapse . The value of $E_0$ is the parameter which
460: determines the exact form of this relation via the above equation.
461: Thus for a given initial or remnant mass and $E_0$ at the onset of
462: collapse the remnant mass or the initial mass as the case may be,
463: can be calculated from equation (18).
464:
465: It should be noted at this point from equation (8) that condition
466: for a strong curvature naked singularity or a black hole depend on
467: the ratio $f_c/f_{co}^{3/2}$, whereas in equation (18)
468: $E_0=f_0(r_b)$ is the value of the $f_0(r)$(equation (9)) at the
469: boundary of the star $r=r_b$. Thus for a given value of $E_0$ one
470: still has the freedom to choose the different set of parameters
471: $(f_c,f_{co})$ so as to satisfy the condition for either naked
472: singularity or a black hole. Therefore for any set of initial and
473: remnant mass in the case of naked singularity resulting in a
474: certain mass loss one can have a black hole also with a different
475: set of structure in the form of density and pressure distribution
476: functions at the onset of collapse. Hence we can conclude that
477: naked singularity scenario can not radiate more energy than a
478: black hole scenario. The same is true even if the naked
479: singularity is weak.
480:
481: We next consider the case when the total mass, size and the
482: internal structure of the star is same. Let us consider two stars
483: with same mass $m_o$, radius $r=r_b$, density distribution
484: $\rho=\rho_c\rho_o(r)$ and pressure distribution $p_r=p_cp_o(r),
485: p_{\theta}=p_{\theta c}p_{o \theta} (r)$ at the initial epoch of
486: collapse. Here only central density $\rho_c$ and central pressure
487: $p_c$ could be different while the internal structure is kept same
488: i.e. $\rho_o(r), p_o(r)$ are same. This imply that
489: for both cases $f_0(r)=f_cr^2g(r)$ where $g(r)$ is kept the same
490: but different values of $f_c$ are allowed. In fact $f_c= 3\rho_c+
491: p_c$.
492: It follows that for $f_c>f_{crit}$ the
493: collapse would terminate in a black hole while for $f_c\le
494: f_{crit}$ would end in a naked singularity, $f_{crit}$ being the
495: critical value determined by equation (8). Physically what it
496: means that higher central density and pressure at the onset of
497: collapse lead to black-hole while lesser ones lead the collapse to
498: naked singularity. Therefore black hole scenarios occur for all
499: values of $E_0$ greater than certain critical value while less
500: than the critical value would end in a naked singularity. Equation
501: (18) implies that for a constant value of $x_0$, $x_s$ decreases
502: for increasing value of $E_0$( for the typical behavior see Fig
503: 1). Therefore scenarios which end up in black hole would have a
504: less remnant mass than the naked singularity scenario having the
505: same initial mass. Hence the collapsing stars which terminate in a
506: black hole would suffer a higher mass loss and radiate more energy
507: than the stars which end up in naked singularity having the same
508: mass, size and same internal structure at the onset of collapse.
509:
510: Another interesting scenario is where the
511: collapse scenario is determined completely by a single parameter.
512: Let us consider at the onset of
513: collapse, matter cloud satisfying adiabatic equation of state,
514: i.e. $p_r(r)= p_{\theta}(r) =a\rho(r)$, $a$ being a constant. Here
515: we consider the two scenarios of naked singularity and black-hole
516: which occur due to the different values of $a$ and where the total
517: mass, size, and the density composition of the star are same. We
518: have
519: \be
520: E_0=x_0+a\rho_b
521: \ee
522: $\rho_b=\rho(r_b)$ is the initial surface
523: density of the star. Using equations (9), (27) and (28) the condition for
524: strong curvature naked singularity given by equation (8 )
525: becomes.
526: \be
527: {3\pi(1+6a)\over 4(1+3a)^{5/2}}\rho_1\ge 13+{15\over 2}\sqrt{3},
528: \rho_1={\rho'''(0)\over \rho(0)^{{5\over 2}}}
529: \ee
530: Thus for a given
531: $\rho_1$ naked singularity occurs for $a\le a_{crit}$ and a black
532: hole for $a> a_{crit}$. The behavior of the ratio of remnant mass
533: $m_r$ to the initial mass $m_o$ remains the same as in previous
534: consideration. That is for increasing $a$ this ratio decreases
535: implying that black hole scenario would radiate more. A typical
536: behavior is shown in Fig 2.
537:
538: Within the framework of classical general relativity
539: the overall consideration of the collapsing star( model incorporating
540: an interior and a exterior space-time) as considered here does not
541: seem to point towards the significance of the formation of a naked
542: singularity in respect of energy radiated.
543: Instead black hole scenario radiate more energy.
544: Thus the occurrence of a naked singularity may not be physically
545: more relevant than a
546: black-hole and even if naked singular scenario does free up a
547: region of space-time for radiation, the overall energy radiated
548: does not seem to increase.
549: We have
550: considered here a typical model(though the space-time considered
551: represent quite a wide class). However in general for spherically
552: symmetric collapse satisfying physically reasonable
553: conditions as considered here( for example type I field, energy
554: conditions etc.)the results should be the same qualitatively.
555:
556: \section{Appendix A.}
557:
558: In general relativity the metric describing the space time
559: must satisfy the field equations $G_{ab}=kT_{ab}$,
560: where $k$, $G_{ab}$ and $T_{ab}$ are the coupling constant,
561: Einstein and stress energy tensors respectively. For a spherically
562: symmetric space-time described by the metric in equation (1) we
563: have
564: \be
565: -k_0T_t^t={F'\over R^2R'}-{\dot f\dot R\over R(1+f)}=
566: {(F_o-f_1R)'\over R^2R'}-{\dot f_1\dot R\over R(1-f_0+f_1)}
567: \ee
568: \be
569: kT_r^r=({\dot F\over R^2\dot R}+{\dot f\over R\dot
570: R})={f_1\over R^2},\quad kT_r^t={-\dot f\dot R\over R(1+f)}=
571: {\dot -f_1\dot R\over R(1-f_0+f_1)},
572: \ee
573: $$2T_{\theta}^{\theta}={(f-R\ddot R-\dot R^2)'\over 2RR'}+{\dot
574: f\over 1+f}({\dot R\over R}+\ddot f +{\dot R'\over R'}-{3\dot
575: f\over 2(1+f)}) ={f_1'\over RR'}$$
576: \be
577: +{\dot f_1\over
578: 1-f_0+f_1}({\ddot f_1\over 2\dot f_1}- {3\dot f_1\over
579: 2(1-f_0+f_1)}+
580: {F_0'\over R\dot R R'}-{f_0'\over \dot R R'}-{F_0\over
581: R^2\dot R})
582: \ee
583: Second part of the above give the non vanishing components of the stress
584: energy tensor for the matter cloud given by equation (3).
585: We are interested only in type I matter field satisfying energy conditions
586: \cite{HW,D5} It follows that throughout the cloud
587: \be
588: F_0'\ge f_1'R,\dot F\le 0\quad
589: {F_0'\over R^2R'}-{f_1'\over RR'}-{2f_1\over R^2}
590: -{\dot f_1\dot R\over 2R(1-f_0+f_1)} \ge 0
591: \ee
592: Using the notation $\sigma=-T^t_t, P=T^r_r$ and $q=T^t_r$.
593: \be
594: \epsilon={\sigma - P +\sqrt{(\sigma+P)^2-4q^2}\over 2},\quad
595: P_r={-\sigma + P + \sqrt{(\sigma+P)^2-4q^2}\over 2},
596: P_{\theta},P_{\phi}
597: \ee
598: where the four real eigenvalues $\epsilon=\epsilon(t,r),P_r=P_r(t,r)$ and
599: $P_{\theta}=P_{\phi}=T^{\theta}_{\theta}$ represent the principle
600: density, principle radial pressure and principle tangential
601: pressure respectively.
602: At $t=0$ $T_{tr}=q=0$ and therefore initial density
603: $\rho(r)=\sigma(0,r)=\epsilon(0,r)$ and initial radial pressure
604: $p_r(r)=P(0,r)=P_r(0,r)$. Using equations (3), (12),and (22) to (25)
605: we get after some simplification
606: \be
607: kr^2\rho(r)=(rf_0-kr^3p_r)',kr^2p_r=f_1(0,r)\rightarrow
608: {4c\over(1-c)^2}={kr^2p_r\over 1-f_0}
609: \ee
610: \be
611: p_{\theta}=P_{\theta}(0,r)=
612: {(r^2p_r)'\over 2r} +{p_rY_0^2f_0\over
613: 2(1-f_0+r^2P_r)}
614: \ee
615:
616: \section{Appendix B.}
617:
618: Nearly all distant objects (stars) in our universe radiate energy
619: in the form of light like particles. Thus the exterior space time
620: out side a spherically symmetric star is rightfully described by
621: the Vaidya space time. The energy for these radiation comes from
622: within the star. The spherically symmetric matter cloud prior to
623: the onset of collapse may be radiating energy in the form of
624: light like particles and in the very distant past may even not be
625: radiating( i.e. in the very distant past the space time out side
626: the star may be Schwarzschild). We therefore discuss the related
627: boundary conditions relevant to our work in this appendix.
628:
629: We first start with the interior space time metric in equation (1)
630: for which describe the collapsing spherically symmetric matter cloud
631: $$ds^2= -dt^2 +{{R'^2}\over{1+f}}dr^2 + R^2d\Omega^2,$$
632: At the onset of collapse at $t=0$ $R(0,r)=r$. The exterior Vaidya
633: space time is given by equation (11)
634: $$ds^2= -(1-{2m(u)\over {\bf r}})du^2 -2dud{\bf r}+ {\bf r}^2d\Omega^2$$
635: The boundary $\Sigma$
636: in the internal metric is $r=r_b=constant$. The Darmois conditions
637: for matching the space-time require that the first and second
638: fundamental forms of the interior and exterior metric are
639: continuous across $\Sigma$ \cite{D5}. This is straight forward and
640: we get the following after using equation (3) and some simplification
641: \be
642: {\bf r}=R(t(u),r_b),\quad F(t,r_b)=2m(u) \ee
643: \be
644: {dt\over du}=\sqrt{1+f(t,r_b)}-\sqrt{f(t,r_b)+{F(t,r_b)\over
645: R(t,r_b)}}
646: \ee
647: \be
648: \dot F|_{r=r_b}=-\left(\dot f R(1-\sqrt{{f+{F\over R}\over
649: 1+f}}\right)_ {r=r_b}
650: \ee
651: Using equation (3)
652: \be
653: u-u_i=\int_0^t{dt\over
654: \sqrt{1-f_0(r_b)+f_1(t,r_b)}-\sqrt{f_0(r_b)}\sqrt{{r_b\over
655: R(t,r_b)}-1}}
656: \ee
657: At the onset of collapse at $t=0, u=u_i$.
658: The apparent horizon is given by $R=F$ and $t=t_{ah}$ is the
659: time when the boundary of the star $r=r_b$ meets the apparent
660: horizon, it therefore follows from the above equation (32)
661: $t\rightarrow t_{ah}, u\rightarrow \infty$ and thus $\infty >u\ge u_i$.
662: Equation (31) imply that function $f_1(t,r)$ must of the form
663: \be
664: f_1(t,r)={4c(r)(1-f_0(r))\exp{(2Y_0(r)
665: \arccos(\sqrt{{R\over r}}))} \over (1-c(r)\exp{(2Y_0(r)
666: \arccos(\sqrt{{R\over r}}))})^2} +r^2f_2(t,r), Y_0(r_b)=\sqrt{{1-f_0(r_b)\over f_0
667: (r_b)}}
668: \ee
669: where $f_2(t,r)$ is a arbitrary $C^2$ function through out the cloud such
670: that $f_2(0,r)=f_2(t,r_b)=0$.
671: Though not essential from the point of view of our
672: purpose however we should discuss briefly on the nature of the
673: space time prior to gravitational collapse not only from the
674: theoretical interest but also to complete the discussion.
675: This intermediate state prior to the collapse should
676: preferably be a compact star in equilibrium with out side space
677: time preferably a radiating metric like Vaidya space times(or some
678: generalization of it)matched at some fix boundary $r=r_b$. The exact
679: form of interior metric for $t<0$ would depend actually on the
680: specific form of the arbitrary function $f_1(t,r)$ and its
681: behavior near $t=0$. However for the sake of completeness we
682: consider the same. Let us consider the interior metric of the star
683: for $t<0$ which may be described by
684: \be
685: ds^2= -AdT^2 +Bdr^2 + r^2d\Omega^2,
686: \ee
687: where $A(t,r)>0$ $B(t,r)>0$ are at least $C^2$ functions through
688: out the cloud $r_b\ge r\ge 0$. Taking into account the fact that
689: at $t=0$ $R(0,r)=r$, $\dot R(t,r)=0$ for the metric in equation
690: (1) Darmois matching conditions for these interior metric at the
691: surface $t=0$ are \cite{D5}
692: \be
693: B(0,r)=f_0(r)-f_1(0,r),\quad {\dot B(0,r)\over
694: \sqrt{A(0,r)}}={-\dot f_1(0,r)\over 1-f_0+r^2p_r}
695: \ee
696: Prior to collapse the exterior metric outside the static boundary $r=r_b=
697: constant$ of the star could be Vaidya space-time.
698: \be
699: ds^2= (1-{2M_p(u)\over{\it r}})du^2 -2du d{\it r}+ {\it r}^2d\Omega^2,
700: \ee
701: Matching conditions at the boundary $r=r_b$ require
702: \be
703: {dT\over du}=\sqrt{{1-{2M_p(u)\over r_b}\over A(T,r_b)}}
704: \ee
705: \be
706: {1\over B(T,r_b)}=1-{2M_(u)\over r_b}
707: \ee
708: \be
709: A(T,r_b)A'(T,r_b)=(1-{2M_p(u)\over r_b}){2M_p(u)\over
710: r_b^2}-{2\over r_b}{dM_p(u)\over du}
711: \ee
712: Thus a set of functions
713: $(A,B)$ satisfying the above conditions at the onset of collapse
714: would describe the interior and exterior of the star prior the
715: onset of collapse. Because of the generality of the two
716: arbitrary functions $A(t,r)$ and
717: $B(t,r)$ the suitable solution satisfying boundary conditions
718: would exist for a given $f_1(t,r)$. Though the exact
719: expressions for $A(T,r)$ and $B(T,r)$ would depend on the exact
720: form of $f_1$ we can consider a simple example.
721: Consider For the
722: function $f_1$ given in equation (33) such that $f_2=0$
723: The space-time prior to onset of collapse therefore is given by
724: \be
725: A=(1+a_1(r)M_p(1-{2M_p\over r_b}-r_b{dM_p\over du})^{1/2}
726: \ee
727: \be
728: B= (1-B_0(1-{B_1\over b_1})-{2B_1\over b_1r_b}{dM_p\over
729: du})^{-1}
730: \ee
731: where $a_1(r)$ and $M_p(u)$ are arbitrary functions of $r$ and $u$
732: respectively such that
733: \be
734: a_1'(r_b)=2r_b,\quad M_p(u_i)=M_0, ({dM_p\over
735: du})_{u=u_i}=-(E_0-x_0)\sqrt{1-x_0}
736: \ee
737: \be
738: B_0=B_0(r)=f_0(r)-r^2p_r(r),\quad, b_0=B_0(r_b)
739: \ee
740: \be
741: B_1=B_1(r)=-r^2p_r\sqrt{1-f_0+r^2p_r},\quad b_1=B_1(r_b)
742: \ee
743:
744:
745: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
746: \setlength{\parskip}{0.32ex}
747:
748: \bibitem{D1} I. H. Dwivedi and P. S. Joshi,
749: Class. Quant. Grav. {\bf 14}, 1223 (1997); P. S. Joshi and I. H.
750: Dwivedi, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 47}, 5357 (1993).
751:
752: \bibitem{D2} I H Dwivedi and P S Joshi Commun. Math. Phys. 1992 146 333;
753: Ori A and Piran T 1990 Phys. Rev. D 42 1068; Lake K 1990 Phys.
754: Rev. Lett. 68 3129; S. S. Deshingkar and P. S. Joshi, Phys. Rev. D
755: {\bf 63},024007 (2001).
756:
757: \bibitem{D3} I. H. Dwivedi and P. S. Joshi, Class. Quant. Grav. {bf 16},41
758: (1999).
759:
760: \bibitem{j1} P. S. Joshi, N. Dadhich and R. Maartens, Mod. Phys. Lett.
761: {\bf A 15} 991 (2000).
762:
763: \bibitem{j2} T. P. Singh, Gen.Rel.Grav. {\bf 30}, 1563 (1998);
764: Pankaj S Joshi and Sandeep K Chahrboti, Int.J.Mod.Phys. D3 (1994)
765: 647-651
766:
767: \bibitem{j3} C. Vaz and L. Witten Nucl. Phys. B487 (1997) 409; T.Harda,
768: H Iguchi and K. Nakao, gr-qc/0003036 to appear Phys. Rev D;H M
769: Antia Gen.Rel.Grav. 31 (1999) 1675-1680
770:
771: \bibitem{D4} In fact all known and observed physical matter
772: field are of type I except the directed radiations( Vaidya
773: space-time) which are type II. A type I matter field is
774: characterized by the existence of four real eigenvalues
775: $\lambda_{(i)}$ of the energy momentum tensor i.e.
776: $T^{ab}=\Sigma_{i=0}^{i=3} \lambda_iE^a_{(i)}E^b_{(i)}$,
777: $E^a_{(i)}$ being an orthonormal basis. $\lambda_0=\rho$
778: associated with timelike basis vector $E^{(0)}$ represent the
779: principle density while $P_1=\lambda_1,P_2=\lambda_2, P_3=
780: \lambda_3$ are principal presseurs. The energy conditions require
781: $\rho\ge 0,\rho+P_1\ge 0$, $\rho+P_2\ge 0$ and $\rho+P_3\ge 0$.
782: For more details see \cite{HW}.
783:
784: \bibitem{TBL} G. Lema{\^i}tre, Ann. Soc. Sci.Bruxelles I, {\bf A53},
785: 51(1933);R. C. Tolman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA $\bf{20}$ (1934),
786: 410; H. Bondi, Mon. Not. Astron. Soc. $\bf{107}$ (1947), 343.
787:
788: \bibitem{D5} The author would like to thank Prof. W. Israel for
789: clearifying certain issue regarding the matching
790: conditions(private communication); For details see Barrabes and
791: Israel, Phys.Rev. D43,1129 (1991).
792:
793: \bibitem{HW} Hawking S W and Ellis G F R (1973) The Large Scale
794: Structure of Space-time(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
795:
796: \bibitem{Pen}See for example, Penrose R 1974 Gravitational
797: Radiation and Gravitational Collapse, Proc. IAU Symp.(IAU
798: Symposium No. 64) ed C DeWitt-Morette (Dordrecht: Reidel);
799: Hegedorn R 1968 Nuovo Cimento A 56 1027.
800:
801: \bibitem{Vaidya} P. C. Vaidya, Nature (London) 171, 260 (1953).
802:
803:
804:
805: \end{thebibliography}
806:
807: \newpage
808: \begin{figure}[h]
809: \epsfbox{fig1.epsi}
810: \caption{ Plot showing the ratio of the remnant mass to the
811: initial mass(i.e. ${m_r\over m_o}$) vs $E_0$. The critical value
812: being $E_0=0.202$ for a star of radius $r_b=10m_o\rightarrow x0=0.2$
813: with initial mass $m_o$ . Thus region $E_0>0.202$ correspond to
814: black-hole region while $E_0,\le 0.202$ is the naked singular
815: region.}
816: \end{figure}
817:
818: \newpage
819: \begin{figure}[]
820: \epsfbox{fig2.epsi}
821: \caption{Graph showing the mass ratio $m_r/m_o$ vs $a$. Here
822: $a\approx 0.001$ is the critical value of $a$. Thus for a star of
823: radius $r_b\approx 45m_0\rightarrow x0\approx 0.04408$ and with
824: surface density $\rho(r_b)\approx 0.001$. Region $a> 0.001$ is
825: black-hole region while the other is naked singular region. }
826: \end{figure}
827:
828: \end{document}
829: