1: \documentstyle[fleqn,twoside,gc-99]{article}
2:
3: \renewcommand\floatpagefraction{1}
4: \renewcommand\topfraction{1}
5: \renewcommand\bottomfraction{0}
6: \renewcommand\textfraction{0}
7: \renewcommand\dblfloatpagefraction{1}
8: \renewcommand\dbltopfraction{1}
9:
10: \begin{document}
11:
12: \twocolumn[
13:
14: \Arthead{0 (00)}{001}{003}
15:
16: \Title{Dilatonic Black Holes Time Stability}
17:
18: \Author{O.S. Khovanskaya\foom 1}
19: {Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Universitetskii Prospekt, 13,
20: Moscow 119992, RUSSIA}
21:
22: \Rec{1 February 2002}
23:
24: \Abstract
25: {The stability under small time perturbations of the dilatonic black
26: hole solution near the determinant curvature singularity is proved.
27: This fact gives the additional arguments that the investigated
28: topological configuration can realise in nature. In the frames of this
29: model primordial black hole remnants are examined as time stable
30: objects, which can form an significant part of a dark matter in the
31: Universe.}
32: ]%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
33: \email 1 {khovansk@xray.sai.msu.ru}
34:
35: One rather important result of the string gravity is a restriction
36: upon the minimal black hole mass \cite{alex97}, \cite{alex98},
37: \cite{khovansk} in frames of the model with the 4D effective string
38: action, containing graviton, dilaton and higher order cur vature
39: corrections. Let me consider the action in the following form
40: \cite{alex97}:
41: \begin{eqnarray}
42: \label{w}
43: S & = & \frac{1}{16\pi} \int d^4 x \sqrt{-g} \biggl[
44: m^2_{Pl} \biggl( -R + 2 \partial_{\mu} \phi
45: \partial^\mu \phi \biggr) \nonumber\\
46: & + & \lambda \biggl( e^{-2\phi} (R_{ijkl}R^{ijkl}
47: - 4 R_{ij}R^{ij} \nonumber\\
48: & + & R^2) \biggr) + \ldots \biggr],
49: \end{eqnarray}
50: where $m_{Pl}$ is Plank mass, $\lambda$ is the string coupling
51: constant, $\phi$ is the dilatonic scalar field. (The system of units
52: where $\hbar=c=G=1$ and $m_{Pl} = 1$ is used. The community of the
53: considered problem is not restricted by choosing $\lambda = 1$).
54:
55: The restriction upon the minimal black hole mass is absent in the
56: Schwarzschild solution of Einstein's classical gravity. This
57: "mathematical" result can be put into practice in modern cosmology to
58: study the remnants of primordial black holes \cite{mark66},
59: \cite{mark79}. Such remnants can represent the final stage of Hawking
60: evaporation of primordial black holes, formed in the early Universe,
61: and are considered as dark matter candidates \cite{khlop2000},
62: \cite{my}.
63:
64: The search of the exact solutions or at least the numerical ones in
65: the offered model (\ref{w}) with the metric depended on two
66: parameters, the radial co-ordinate and the time, is known to be very
67: difficult \cite{alex97}, \cite{alex98}, \cite{khovansk}. N evertheless
68: one can receive the general properties of the time-evolution of such
69: solutions by study its stability about time-parameter in all
70: particular points.
71:
72: The black hole solution in the frames of considered model has only two
73: particular points. The first one is the usual coordinate singularity
74: $r_h$, which represents the event regular horizon of a black hole. The
75: second particular point is the determinant c urvature singularity,
76: which has the infinite derivatives of the metric functions
77: \cite{alex98}.
78:
79: Primordial black hole stability on the event horizon was investigated
80: in \cite{kanti}, \cite{jap}.
81:
82: It was obtained (P. Kanti \cite{kanti} at al.) that the dilatonic
83: black holes are stable near the black hole regular horizon $r_h$ under
84: linear time-dependent perturbations, which depend on only one radial
85: parameter. The metric parameterisation was
86: \begin{eqnarray*}
87: ds^2 = e^{\Gamma(r,t)}dt^2 - e^{\Lambda(r,t)}dr^2 - r^2 (d\, \theta^2 + \sin^2\, \theta d\, \psi^2)
88: \end{eqnarray*}
89: and the asymptotic forms of metric components and dilaton field near the regular horizon $r \approx r_h$ were
90: \begin{eqnarray*}
91: e^{-\Lambda(r)} & = & \lambda_1\,(r - r_h) + \lambda_2\,(r - r_h)^{2} + \ldots, \\
92: e^{\Gamma(r)} & = & \gamma_1\,(r - r_h) + \gamma_2\,(r - r_h)^{2} + \ldots, \\
93: \phi(r)& = & \phi_h + \phi_h'\,(r - r_h) + \phi_h''\,(r - r_h)^{2} + \ldots,
94: \end{eqnarray*}
95: where $\lambda_1=2/(\lambda e^{\phi_h}\phi'_h/g^2+2r_h)$.
96:
97: P. Kanti at al. considered perturbing equations by time-dependent
98: linear perturbations of the form:
99: \begin{eqnarray*}
100: \Gamma(r,t) & = & \Gamma(r) + \delta\,\Gamma(r,t) = \Gamma(r) + \delta\,\Gamma(r)\,e^{i\,\omega\,t}, \\
101: \Lambda(r,t) & = & \Lambda(r) + \delta\,\Lambda(r,t) = \Lambda(r) + \delta\,\Lambda(r)\,e^{i\,\omega\,t}, \\
102: \phi(r,t)& = & \phi(r) + \delta\,\phi(r,t) = \phi(r) + \delta\,\phi(r)\,e^{i\,\omega\,t},
103: \end{eqnarray*}
104: where the variations $\delta\,\Gamma(r,t), \delta\,\Lambda(r,t)$ and
105: $\delta\,\phi(r,t)$ were assumed to be small. The stability problem
106: was reduced to one-dimensional Schrodinger problem \cite{kanti}.
107:
108: The regular horizon stability was investigated also in the paper by
109: T.Torii and K.-i.Maeda \cite{jap}. They used the catastrophe theory
110: and compared it with linear perturbation analysis. Generally the
111: catastrophe theory is a mathematical tool to investigate a variety of
112: some physical states, T.Torii and K.-i.Maeda showed this method is
113: also applicable to the stability analysis of various types of
114: non-Abelian black holes \cite{tach}.
115:
116: It is necessary to make more careful stability analysis under the
117: horizon with the help of suitable choice of asymptotic forms that
118: approximate the metric functions. In this work I investigate the
119: dilatonic black hole stability near the determinant curvat ure
120: singularity $r=r_s$ \cite{alex98}. After the definition of a rest
121: point, this problem can be reduced to a one-dimensional Schrodinger
122: problem under the variation of the field equation. One can prove that
123: the small time perturbations do not increase. S o in that case the
124: solution of the dilatonic black hole is stable near $r_s$.
125:
126: To investigate the stability under time per\-tur\-ba\-tions of the
127: dilatonic black hole near the singularity $r \approx r_s$, I use the
128: model (\ref{w}) with the following non-static, asymptotically flat
129: spherically symmetric metric \cite{alex97}:
130: \begin{eqnarray}
131: \label{q}
132: ds^2 & = & \Delta dt^2 - {\displaystyle \frac {\sigma^2 } {\Delta}} dr^2 - r^2 (d\, \theta^2 + \sin^2\, \theta d\, \psi^2),
133: \end{eqnarray}
134: where $\Delta=\Delta(r,t)$, $\sigma=\sigma(r,t)$, $\phi=\phi(r,t)$.
135:
136: According to Kanti's method \cite{kanti} I produce the metric
137: functions in the form:
138: \begin{eqnarray}
139: \label{ka1}
140: \Delta(r,t)=\Delta(r) + \delta\,\Delta(r,t) = \Delta(r) + \delta\,\Delta(r)\,e^{i\,\omega\,t},
141: \end{eqnarray}
142: \begin{eqnarray}
143: \sigma(r,t)=\sigma(r) + \delta\,\sigma(r,t) = \sigma(r) + \delta\,\sigma(r)\,e^{i\,\omega\,t},
144: \end{eqnarray}
145: \begin{eqnarray}
146: \label{ka2}
147: \phi(r,t)=\phi(r) + \delta\,\phi(r,t) = \phi(r) + \delta\,\phi(r)\,e^{i\,\omega\,t},
148: \end{eqnarray}
149: where the variations $\delta\,\Delta(r,t), \delta\,\sigma(r,t)$ and
150: $\delta\,\phi(r,t)$ are assumed to be small \footnote{In this work I
151: only study the small time perturbations of the diagonal metric
152: components because in general I investigate the case of spherically
153: symmetric metric. I'm not interesting in some rotating effects, which
154: can appear because of non-zero non-diagonal metric components.}.
155:
156: Thus for such definition of variables $r$ and $t$ in
157: (\ref{ka1})-(\ref{ka2}) the asymptotic forms of metric functions near
158: the singularity $r \approx r_s$ depend on only radial coordinate $r$
159: and do not depend on time:
160: \begin{eqnarray}
161: \label{e}
162: \Delta (r) = \delta_0 + {\displaystyle \frac {\phi_2\,(r - r_s )}{\theta }} + \delta_3\,(r - r_s )^{3/2} + \ldots,
163: \end{eqnarray}
164: \begin{eqnarray}
165: \label{ba}
166: \sigma (r) = \sigma_0 + \sigma_2\,\sqrt{r - r_s } + \ldots,
167: \end{eqnarray}
168: \begin{eqnarray}
169: \label{r}
170: \phi (r) = \phi_0 + \phi_2\,(r - r_s ) + \phi_3\,(r - r_s )^{3/2} + \ldots,
171: \end{eqnarray}
172: where
173: $$
174: \phi_0 = {\displaystyle \frac {3}{4}} \,{\rm ln}(2) -
175: {\displaystyle \frac {1}{2}} \,{\rm ln}( - \eta )
176: + {\rm ln}(1 - \eta ) - {\rm ln}(r_s ),
177: $$
178: $$
179: \phi_2 = {\displaystyle \frac {1}{2}} \,{\displaystyle \frac {(
180: \eta - 1)\,\sqrt{2}}{\eta \,r_s }},
181: $$
182: \begin{eqnarray*}
183: \phi_3 & = & - \frac {1}{96 r_s \,\eta ^{4}} \, \sigma_2\,(\eta - 1)^{2}\,\sqrt{2}\,( - 8\,\eta + 8\, \eta ^{3} \\
184: & - & 20\,\eta ^{2} + 4\,\eta ^{4} - 4\cdot 2^{3/4}\,\eta ^{2}
185: + 3\cdot 2^{3/4}\,\eta ^{4} + 2^{3/4}),
186: \end{eqnarray*}
187: $$
188: \sigma_0 = 4\,{\displaystyle \frac {\eta }{1 - \eta ^{2}}},
189: $$
190: $$
191: \delta_0 = - 16\,{\displaystyle \frac {\eta ^{2}}{(1 - \eta ^{2
192: })^{2}}},
193: $$
194: $$
195: \delta_3 = - {\displaystyle \frac {16}{3}} \,{\displaystyle
196: \frac {\sigma_2\,(\eta - 1)}{r_s \,(1 + \eta )^{2}}}
197: $$
198: \begin{center}
199: and
200: \end{center}
201: $$
202: \theta = {\displaystyle \frac {1}{32}} \,{\displaystyle \frac {
203: \sqrt{2}\,(1 - \eta ^{2})^{2}}{\eta ^{2}}}.
204: $$
205:
206: It is possible to note that $\eta \in (-1,0)$. We have three free
207: parameters $\eta$, $\sigma_2$ and $r_s$ \footnote{In this case it is
208: conveniently to choose $\eta$, $\sigma_2$ and $r_s$ as free. There are
209: direct three free parameters which can be reduced to the usual free
210: parameters: the black hole mass, the dilaton charge and the dilaton
211: value at infinity \cite{alex98}.}.
212:
213: The exact field equations for (\ref{w})-(\ref{q}) which depend on $r$
214: and $t$ are in Appendix. Transforming (\ref{t})-(\ref{y}), one can
215: obtain the autonomous (over t) equation system of the first order in
216: the following form:
217: \begin{equation}
218: \label{i}
219: \left\{
220: \begin{array}{rcl}
221: \dot\Delta & = & \alpha\\
222: \dot\sigma & = & \beta\\
223: \dot\phi & = & \gamma\\
224: \dot\alpha & = & -G \\
225: \dot\beta & = & 2G/\Lambda\\
226: \dot\gamma & = & F\\
227: \end{array}
228: \right.
229: \end{equation}
230: where $G,F$ are functions of $r, \Delta, \Delta', \Delta'', \sigma,
231: \sigma', \phi, \phi', \phi''$ and $\alpha,\beta,\gamma$ are additional
232: variables.
233:
234: The function $\Lambda = -2\Delta/\sigma$. Using the asimptotic form
235: (\ref{e})-(\ref{ba}) one can obtained that $\Lambda=8 \eta/(1-\eta^2)$
236: for $r=r_s$. $\Lambda \ne 0, \Lambda \ne \infty$ near the singularity
237: $r \approx r_s$ because the dilaton function $ \phi(r)$ (\ref{r}) is
238: limited in this region \cite{alex98}.
239:
240: Let me examine the equilibrium states of the autonomous system
241: (\ref{i}).
242:
243: Let the point $ (\Delta^*, \, \sigma^*, \, \phi^*, \, \alpha^*, \,
244: \beta^*, \, \gamma^*) $ is some rest point of the system (\ref{i}),
245: that is for
246: $$
247: f_i \in \{ \alpha, \, \beta, \, \gamma, \, -G, \, 2G/\Lambda, \, F \},
248: $$
249: $$i=1,2, \ldots ,6$$
250: the condition
251: $$
252: f_i(\Delta^*, \, \sigma^*, \, \phi^* \, \alpha^*, \, \beta^*, \, \gamma^*)=0
253: $$
254: is executed. The trivial "equilibrium-like" solution which corresponds
255: to the given rest point is asymptotically stable if the first order
256: system is stable. It occurs when the all roots $s$ of the
257: characteristic equation
258: \begin{eqnarray}
259: \label{n}
260: det \Bigl[ \Bigl(\frac{df_i}{dy_k} \Bigr)|_{rest\,\,point } - s\cdot \delta^i_k \Bigl] & = & 0
261: \end{eqnarray}
262: where $y_k \in \{\Delta^*, \, \sigma^*, \, \phi^*, \, \alpha^*, \, \beta^*, \, \gamma^* \}$ ($k=1,2, \ldots ,6$) have the negative real parts.
263:
264: It is possible to find the rest point of the system (\ref{i}) using the asymptotic forms (\ref{e})-(\ref{r}) near the singularity $r \approx r_s$ from the condition:
265: \begin{equation}
266: \label{j}
267: \left\{
268: \begin{array}{rcl}
269: F|_{rest\,point} & = & 0\\
270: G|_{rest\,point} & = & 0\\
271: \end{array}
272: \right.
273: \end{equation}
274: In the rest point $ \alpha=\beta=\gamma \equiv 0 $ and $\eta =
275: \eta^*=C_1, \,\, \sigma_2=\sigma_2(r_s)=C_2/r_s^{1/2}<0 $, where $C_1$
276: and $C_2$ are the number coefficients.
277:
278: By solving (\ref{n}) one can receive the pure imaginary roots $s$.
279: Thus some additional investigations for determine the stability are
280: required.
281:
282: Using the method of linear stability one can rewrite the field
283: equations (\ref{t})-(\ref{y}) with the variations:
284: \begin{eqnarray}
285: \label{kl}
286: 0 & = & A_{i\,1}\delta\,\ddot \phi + A_{i\,2}\delta\,\dot \phi + A_{i\,3}\delta\,\phi + A_{i\,4}\delta\,\phi' \nonumber\\
287: & + & A_{i\,5}\delta\,\phi'' + B_{i\,1}\delta\,\ddot \Delta + B_{i\,2}\delta\,\dot \Delta + B_{i\,3}\delta\,\Delta \nonumber\\
288: & + & B_{i\,4}\delta\,\Delta' + B_{i\,5}\delta\,\Delta'' + C_{i\,1}\delta\,\ddot \sigma + C_{i\,2}\delta\,\dot \sigma \nonumber\\
289: & + & C_{i\,3}\delta\,\sigma + C_{i\,4}\delta\,\sigma' + C_{i\,5}\delta\,\sigma'',
290: \end{eqnarray}
291: where $i=1..4$.
292: Nonzero coefficients are in Appendix.
293:
294: In the vicinity of finding from (\ref{j}) rest point $O^{+}(0,
295: (r-r_s))$, $(r-r_s) \sim 10^{-3}$ it is possible to evaluate the
296: coefficients in front of the variations in (\ref{kl}) using the
297: asymptotic forms (\ref{e})-(\ref{r}). The simplified equation from
298: (\ref{kl}) becomes the following:
299:
300: \begin{eqnarray}
301: \label{m}
302: A(\delta\phi)'' + B(\delta\phi)' + C(\delta\phi) & = & \omega^2(\delta\phi),
303: \end{eqnarray}
304: where $A$,$B$ and $C$ near the singularity $r \approx r_s$ are:
305: \begin{eqnarray*}
306: A & = & \frac{a_1}{r_s} + \frac{a_2\,(r-r_s)^{1/2}}{r_s^{3/2}} + O(r-r_s),\\
307: B & = & \frac{b_1}{r_s^2} + \frac{b_2\,(r-r_s)^{-1/2}}{r_s^{5/2}} + O((r-r_s)^{1/2}), \\
308: C & = & \frac{c_1}{r_s^3} + \frac{c_2\,(r-r_s)^{-1/2}}{r_s^{5/2}} + O((r-r_s)^{1/2}),
309: \end{eqnarray*}
310: where $a_1,a_2,b_1,b_2,c_1,c_2$ depend on $\sigma_2$ and $\eta$. For
311: $r=r_s$ these coefficients are number constants.
312:
313: The eigenvalue $\omega^2$ in (\ref{m}) has only positive values. Thus,
314: the small time perturbations do not increase (they can oscillate). So
315: in that case the solution is stable in the vicinity of finding rest
316: point $(O^{+}(0,(r-r_s))$.
317:
318: Taking into account both results: the stability of the solution under
319: time perturbations at the regular event horizon $r_h$ \cite{kanti} and
320: at the determinant curvature singularity $r_s$, it is possible to
321: conclude that the solution of dilatonic black ho le is stable in all
322: particular points. In application to cosmology this fact can confirm
323: the existence of remnants of primordial black holes, which are stable
324: during time evolution.
325:
326: I would like to gratefully acknowledge to Prof. M.V. Sazhin and Dr.
327: S.O. Alexeyev for useful comments.
328:
329: \vskip100mm
330:
331: {\Large{Appendix}}
332:
333: \small
334:
335: The exact field equations for (\ref{w})-(\ref{q}) which depend on $r$
336: and $t$ are the following unwieldy form:
337: \begin{eqnarray}
338: \label{t}
339: 0 & = & 2\,e^{2\,\phi}\,r^{2}\,{\phi'}^{2}\,\sigma^{3}\,\Delta^{2} - 8\,\phi''\,\sigma^{3}\,\Delta^{2} \nonumber\\
340: & - & 2\,e^{2\,\phi}\,r\,\sigma'\,\sigma^{2}\,\Delta^{2} + 16\,\phi'^{2}\,\sigma^{3}\,\Delta^{2} \nonumber\\
341: & + & 8\,\phi'\,\sigma'\,\sigma^{2}\,\Delta^{2} +
342: 2\,\sigma^{5}\,e^{2\,\phi}\,r^{2}\,\dot \phi^{2} \nonumber\\
343: & + & 8\,\dot \phi\,\dot \sigma\,\sigma^{4} - 8\,\dot \phi\,\dot \sigma\,\sigma^{2}\,\Delta \nonumber\\
344: & - & 16\,\dot \phi^{2}\,\sigma^{3}\,\Delta + 16\,\sigma^{5}\, \dot \phi^{2} \nonumber\\
345: & - & 8\,\sigma ^{5}\,\ddot \phi +
346: 8\,\ddot \phi\,\sigma^{3}\,\Delta \nonumber\\
347: & - & 16\,\Delta^{3}\,\phi'^{2}\, \sigma
348: - 24\,\Delta ^{3}\,\phi'\,\sigma' + 8\,\Delta ^{3}\,\phi''\,\sigma,
349: \end{eqnarray}
350: \begin{eqnarray}
351: 0 & = & - 2\,e^{2\,\phi}\,\sigma^{4}\,\Delta^{2}+ 2\,e^{2\,\phi}\,r\,\Delta'\,\sigma^{2}\,\Delta^{2} \nonumber\\
352: & - & 2\,\Delta^{3}\,e^{2\,\phi}\,r^{2}\,\phi'^{2}\,\sigma^{2}
353: + 24\,\Delta^{3}\,\phi'\,\Delta' + 8\,\dot \phi \,\dot \Delta \,\sigma^{2}\,\Delta \nonumber\\
354: & - & 8\,\phi'\,\Delta'\,\sigma^{2}\,\Delta ^{2} + 2\,\Delta ^{3}\,e^{2\,\phi}\,\sigma^{2} \nonumber\\
355: & - & 16\,\ddot \phi \,\sigma \,\Delta^{2} + 32\,\dot \phi ^{2}\,\sigma ^{2}\,\Delta ^{2} \nonumber\\
356: & - & 32\,\dot \phi ^{2}\,\sigma^{4}\,\Delta + 16\,\ddot \phi\,\sigma ^{4}\,\Delta - 8\,\dot \phi\,\dot \Delta \,\sigma ^{4} \nonumber\\
357: & - & 2\,e^{2\,\phi}\,r^{2}\,\dot \phi ^{2}\,\sigma ^{4}\,\Delta,
358: \end{eqnarray}
359: \begin{eqnarray}
360: 0 & = & - 8\,\dot \Delta ^{2}\,\sigma ^{3}\,\Delta - 8\,\Delta''\,\sigma^{3}\,\Delta ^{3} - 16\,\ddot \sigma \,\sigma ^{2}\,\Delta ^{3} \nonumber\\
361: & - & 8\,\dot \Delta \,\dot \sigma \,\sigma ^{2}\,\Delta ^{2} + 4\,\sigma ^{5}\,e^{2\,\phi }\,r
362: ^{2}\,\ddot \phi \,\Delta ^{2} + 8\,\Delta ^{4}\,\Delta''\,\sigma \nonumber\\
363: & - & 8\,\Delta ^{4}\,e^{2\,\phi }\,r\,\phi'\,\sigma ^{3} - 24\,\Delta ^{4}\,\Delta'\,\sigma' + 8\,\Delta'\,\sigma'\,\sigma ^{2}\,\Delta ^{3} \nonumber\\
364: & + & 32\,\dot \sigma ^{2}\,\sigma \,\Delta ^{3} + 8\,\ddot \Delta \,\sigma ^{3}\,\Delta ^{2} + 8\,\Delta'^{2}\,\sigma \,\Delta ^{3} \nonumber\\
365: & - & 8\,\sigma ^{5}\,\ddot \Delta \,\Delta + 16\,\sigma^{5}\,\dot \Delta ^{2} - 24\,\dot \Delta \,\dot \sigma \,\sigma
366: ^{4}\,\Delta \nonumber\\
367: & + & 16\,\ddot \sigma \,\sigma ^{4}\,\Delta ^{2} - 4\,\Delta ^{4}\,e^{2\,\phi}\,r
368: ^{2}\,\phi''\,\sigma ^{3} \nonumber\\
369: & - & 4\,e^{2\,\phi}\,\Delta'\,r^{2}\,\phi'\,\sigma ^{3}\,\Delta ^{3} + 4\,\Delta ^{4}\,e^{2\,\phi}\,r^{2}\,\phi'\,\sigma'\,\sigma ^{2} \nonumber\\
370: & + & 4\,e^{2\,\phi}\,\dot \sigma \,r^{2}\,\dot \phi \,\sigma ^{4}\,\Delta ^{2} - 4\,\sigma ^{5}\,e^{2\,\phi}\,r
371: ^{2}\,\dot \phi \,\dot \Delta \,\Delta,
372: \end{eqnarray}
373: \begin{eqnarray}
374: \label{y}
375: 0 & = & 2\,e^{2\,\phi}\,r\,\Delta''\,\Delta^{3}\,\sigma ^{3} + 128\,\dot \phi \,\dot\sigma \,\phi'\,\Delta ^{3}\,\sigma ^{2} + 16\,\phi'\,\ddot\Delta \,\Delta ^{2}\,\sigma ^{3} \nonumber\\
376: & - & 32\,\Delta ^{4}\,\phi'^{2}\,\Delta'\,\sigma + 32\,\dot\phi ^{2}\,\Delta'\,
377: \Delta ^{2}\,\sigma ^{3} + 32\,\dot\phi' \,\dot\Delta \,\Delta ^{2}\,
378: \sigma ^{3} \nonumber\\
379: & + & 16\,\dot\phi \,\Delta'\,\dot\sigma \,\Delta ^{2}\,
380: \sigma ^{2} - 64\,\dot\phi\, \dot\Delta \phi'\,\Delta ^{2}\,
381: \sigma ^{3} + 16\,\Delta ^{4}\,\phi'\,\Delta'' \,\sigma \nonumber\\
382: & - & 16\,\ddot\phi \,\Delta'\,\Delta ^{2}\,\sigma ^{3} - 16\,\phi'\,\dot\Delta ^{2}\,
383: \Delta \,\sigma ^{3} - 2\,e^{2\,\phi}\,r\,\Delta'\,\sigma'\,\Delta ^{3}\,\sigma ^{2} \nonumber\\
384: & - & 4\,\sigma ^{5}\,e^{2\,\phi }\,r\,\dot\Delta ^{2} - 4\,e^{2\,\phi }\,r\,\ddot\sigma \,\Delta ^{2}\,\sigma ^{4} - 48\,\Delta ^{4}\,\phi'\,\Delta'\,\sigma' \nonumber \\
385: & + & 32\,\ddot\phi\,\sigma'\,\Delta ^{3}\,\sigma ^{2} + 16\,\Delta ^{4
386: }\,\phi'' \,\Delta'\,\sigma - 16\,\dot\phi \dot\Delta \,\sigma'\,\Delta ^{2}\,
387: \sigma ^{2} \nonumber\\
388: & - & 4\,\sigma ^{5}\,e^{2\,\phi}\,r\,\dot\phi ^{2}\,\Delta ^{2} + 64\,\phi'\,\dot\sigma ^{2}\,\Delta^{3}\,\sigma + 4\,e^{2\,\phi}\,\Delta'\,\Delta ^{3}\,\sigma ^{3} \nonumber\\
389: & - & 64\,\dot\phi ^{2}\,\sigma'\,\Delta ^{3}\,\sigma ^{2} - 64\,\dot\phi'\,\dot\sigma \,\Delta ^{3}\,\sigma ^{2} + 16\,\Delta'^{2}\,\phi'\,\Delta ^{3}\,\sigma \nonumber\\
390: & - & 32\,\phi'\,\ddot\sigma \,\Delta ^{3}\,\sigma ^{2} - 16\,\phi'\,\dot\Delta \,\dot\sigma \,\Delta ^{2}\,
391: \sigma ^{2} \nonumber\\
392: & + & 6\,e^{2\,\phi}\,\dot\sigma \,r\,\Delta'\,\Delta \,\sigma ^{4} + 2\,\sigma ^{5}\,e^{2\,\phi}\,r\,\ddot\Delta \,\Delta - 4\,\Delta ^{4}\,e^{2\,\phi}
393: \,\sigma'\,\sigma ^{2} \nonumber\\
394: & + & 4\,\Delta ^{4}\,e^{2\,\phi}\,r\,\phi'^{2}\,\sigma ^{3},
395: \end{eqnarray}
396:
397: Nonzero coefficients for the field equations (\ref{t})-(\ref{y}) with the variations (\ref{kl}):
398: \begin{eqnarray*}
399: {A_{4 \,1}} & = & - 2\,\Delta '\,\sigma ^{3}\,\Delta ^{2} + 4\,\sigma '\,\sigma ^{2}\,\Delta ^{3}, \\
400: {A_{4 \,3}} & = & \Delta ^{4}\,r\,\phi '^{2}\,\sigma ^{3}\,e^{2\,\phi } +
401: \Delta '\,\sigma ^{3}\,e
402: ^{2\,\phi }\,\Delta ^{3} - \Delta ^{4}\,\sigma '\,\sigma ^{2}\,e^{2\,\phi } \\
403: & + & {\displaystyle
404: \frac {1}{2}} \,r\,\Delta ''\,\sigma ^{3}\,e^{2\,\phi }\,\Delta ^{3} - {\displaystyle \frac {1}{2}} \,r\,\Delta '\,\sigma '\,\sigma ^{2}\,e^{2\,\phi }\,
405: \Delta ^{3}, \\
406: {A_{4 \,4}} & = & \Delta ^{4}\,r\,\phi '\,\sigma ^{3}\,e^{2\,\phi } - 6\,
407: \Delta ^{4}\,\Delta '\,\sigma ' + 2\,\Delta ^{4}
408: \,\Delta ''\,\sigma \\
409: & - & 8\,\Delta ^{4}\,\phi '\,\Delta '\,\sigma + 2\,\Delta '^{2}\,\sigma \,\Delta ^{3}, \\
410: {A_{4 \,5}} & = & 2\,\Delta ^{4}\,\Delta '\,\sigma,\\
411: {B_{4 \,1}} & = & 2\,\phi '\,
412: \sigma ^{3}\,\Delta ^{2} + {\displaystyle \frac {1}{4}} \,
413: \sigma ^{5}\,r\,e^{2\,\phi }\,\Delta ,\\
414: {B_{4 \,3}} & = & - 24\,\Delta ^{3}\,\phi '\,\Delta '\,\sigma ' + 8\,\Delta ^{3}\,\phi ''\,\Delta '\,\sigma \\
415: & + & 6\,\Delta '^{2}\,\phi '\,\sigma \,\Delta ^{2} - 16\,\Delta ^{3}\,\phi '^{2}\,\Delta '\,\sigma \\
416: & + & 2\,\Delta ^{3}\,r\,\phi '^{2}\,\sigma ^{3}\,e^{2\,\phi } - 2\,\Delta ^{3}\,\sigma '\,\sigma ^{2}\,e^{2\,\phi } \\
417: & - & {\displaystyle \frac {3}{4}} \,r\, \Delta '\,\sigma '\,\sigma ^{2}\,e^{2\,\phi }\,
418: \Delta ^{2} + {\displaystyle \frac {3}{4}} \,r\,\Delta ''\,\sigma ^{3}\,e^{
419: 2\,\phi }\,\Delta ^{2} \\
420: & + & {\displaystyle \frac {3}{2}} \,\Delta '\,\sigma ^{3}\,e^{2\,\phi }\,
421: \Delta ^{2} + 8\,\Delta ^{3}\,\phi '\,\Delta''\,\sigma ,\\
422: {B_{4 \,4}} & = & 2\,\Delta ^{4}\,\phi ''\,\sigma - 6\,\Delta ^{4}\,\phi '\,\sigma ' - {\displaystyle \frac {1}{4}} \,r\,\sigma '\,\sigma ^{2}\,e^{2\,\phi
423: }\,\Delta ^{3} \\
424: & - & 4\,\Delta ^{4}\,\phi '^{2}\,\sigma + {\displaystyle \frac {1
425: }{2}} \,\sigma ^{3}\,e^{2\,\phi }\,\Delta ^{3} + 4\,\Delta '\,
426: \phi '\,\sigma \,\Delta ^{3},\\
427: {B_{4 \,5}} & = & 2\,\Delta ^{4}\,\phi '\,\sigma + {\displaystyle \frac {1}{4}} \,r\,
428: \sigma ^{3}\,e^{2\,\phi }\,\Delta ^{3},\\
429: {C_{4 \,1}} & = & - 4\,\phi '\,\sigma ^{2}\,\Delta ^{3} - {\displaystyle \frac {1}{2}}
430: \,r\,\sigma ^{4}\,e^{2\,\phi }\,\Delta ^{2},\\
431: {C_{4 \,3}} & = & - {\displaystyle \frac {1}{2}} \,r\,\Delta '\,\sigma '\,\sigma \,e^{2\,\phi }\,
432: \Delta ^{3} + {\displaystyle \frac {3}{2}} \,\Delta ^{4}\,r
433: \,\phi '^{2}\,\sigma ^{2}
434: \,e^{2\,\phi } \\
435: & + & {\displaystyle \frac {3}{2}} \,\Delta '\,\sigma ^{2}\,e^{2\,\phi }\,
436: \Delta ^{3} - \Delta ^{4}\,\sigma '\,\sigma \,e^{2\,\phi } \\
437: & + & 2\,\Delta ^{4}\,\phi '\,\Delta '' - 4\,\Delta ^{4}\,\phi '^{2}\,\Delta ' + 2\,\Delta '^{2}\,\phi '\,\Delta ^{3} \\
438: & + & 2\,\Delta ^{4}\,\phi ''\,\Delta ' + {\displaystyle \frac {3}{4}} \,r\,\Delta ''\,\sigma ^{2}\,e^{2\,\phi }\,\Delta ^{3},\\
439: {C_{4 \,4}} & = & - {\displaystyle \frac {1}{4}} \,r\,\Delta '\,\sigma ^{2}\,e^{2\,\phi }\,
440: \Delta ^{3} - {\displaystyle \frac {1}{2}} \,\Delta ^{4}\,
441: \sigma ^{2}\,e^{2\,\phi } - 6\,\Delta ^{4}\,\phi '\,\Delta ',\\
442: {A_{3 \,1}} & = & {\displaystyle \frac {1}{2}} \,\sigma ^{5}\,r
443: ^{2}\,e^{2\,\phi }\,\Delta ^{2},\\
444: {A_{3 \,3}} & = & - \Delta ^{4}\,r^{2}\,\phi ''\,\sigma ^{3}\,e^{2
445: \,\phi } - 2\,\Delta ^{4}\,r\,\phi '\,\sigma ^{3}\,e^{2\,\phi } \\
446: & + & \Delta ^{4}\,r^{2}\,\phi '\,\sigma '\,\sigma ^{2}\,e^{2\,\phi } - \Delta '\,r^{2}\,\phi '\,\sigma ^{3}\,e^{2\,\phi }\,\Delta ^{3},\\
447: {A_{3 \,4}} & = & - \Delta ^{4}\,r\,\sigma ^{3}\,e
448: ^{2\,\phi } + {\displaystyle \frac {1}{2}} \,\Delta ^{4}
449: \,r^{2}\,\sigma '\,\sigma ^{2}\,e^{2\,\phi } \\
450: & - & {\displaystyle \frac {1}{2}} \,\Delta '\,r^{2}\,\sigma ^{3}\,e^{2\,\phi }\,\Delta ^{3},\\
451: {A_{3 \,5}} & = & - {\displaystyle \frac {1}{2}} \,\Delta ^{4}
452: \,r^{2}\,\sigma ^{3}\,e^{2\,\phi} ,\\
453: {B_{3 \,1}} & = & \sigma ^{3}\,\Delta ^{2} - \sigma ^{5}\,
454: \Delta ,\\
455: {B_{3 \,3}} & = & 3\,\Delta '^{2}\,\sigma \,\Delta ^{2} - 4\,\Delta ^{3}\,
456: r\,\phi '\,\sigma ^{3}\,e
457: ^{2\,\phi } - 2\,\Delta ^{3}\,r^{2}\,\phi ''\,\sigma ^{3}\,e^{2\,\phi } \\
458: & + & 4\,\Delta ^{3}\,\Delta ''\,\sigma + 3\,\Delta '\,\sigma '\,\sigma ^{2}\,
459: \Delta ^{2} - 12\,\Delta ^{3}\,\Delta '\,\sigma ' \\
460: & - & 3\,\Delta''\,\sigma ^{3}\,\Delta ^{2} - {\displaystyle \frac {3}{2}} \,\Delta '\,r^{2}\,\phi '\,\sigma ^{3}\,e^{2\,\phi }\,\Delta ^{2} \\
461: & + & 2\,\Delta ^{3}\,r^{2}\,\phi '\,\sigma '\,\sigma^{2}\,e^{2\,\phi },\\
462: {B_{3 \,4}} & = & - 3\,\Delta ^{4}\,\sigma ' - {\displaystyle \frac {1}{2}} \,r^{2
463: }\,\phi '\,\sigma ^{3}\,e
464: ^{2\,\phi }\,\Delta ^{3} + \sigma '\,\sigma ^{2}\,\Delta ^{3} \\
465: & + & 2\,\Delta '\,
466: \sigma \,\Delta ^{3},\\
467: {B_{3 \,5}} & = & \Delta ^{4}\,\sigma - \sigma ^{3}\,
468: \Delta ^{3},\\
469: {C_{3 \,1}} & = & - 2\,\sigma ^{2}\,\Delta ^{3} + 2\,\sigma
470: ^{4}\,\Delta ^{2},\\
471: {C_{3 \,3}} & = & \Delta'^{2}\,\Delta ^{3} - 3\,\Delta ^{4}\,r\,\phi '\,\sigma ^{2}\,e^{2\,\phi } - {\displaystyle \frac {3}{2}} \,\Delta ^{4}\,r^{
472: 2}\,\phi ''\,\sigma ^{2}\,e^{2\,\phi } \\
473: & + & 2\,\Delta '\,\sigma '\,\sigma \,\Delta^{3} - 3\,\Delta ''\,\sigma ^{2}\,\Delta ^{3} \\
474: & - & {\displaystyle\frac {3}{2}} \,\Delta '\,r^{2}\,\phi '\,\sigma ^{2}
475: \,e^{2\,\phi (r)}\,\Delta ^{3} + \Delta ^{4}\,\Delta '' \\
476: & + & \Delta ^{4}\,r^{2}\,\phi '\,\sigma'\,\sigma \,e^{2\,\phi },\\
477: {C_{3 \,4}} & = & \Delta '\,
478: \sigma ^{2}\,\Delta ^{3} - 3\,\Delta ^{4}\,\Delta ' + {\displaystyle \frac {1}{2
479: }} \,\Delta ^{4}\,r^{2}\,\phi '\,\sigma ^{2}\,e^{2\,\phi },\\
480: {A_{2 \,1}} & = & 2\,\sigma ^{4}\,\Delta - 2\,\sigma ^{2}
481: \,\Delta ^{2},\\
482: {A_{2 \,3}} & = & {\displaystyle \frac {1}{2}} \,r\,\Delta '\,\sigma ^{2}\,e^{
483: 2\,\phi }\,\Delta ^{2} - {\displaystyle \frac {1}{2}} \,
484: \sigma ^{4}\,e^{2\,\phi }\,\Delta ^{2} \\
485: & + &
486: {\displaystyle \frac {1}{2}} \,\Delta ^{3}\,\sigma ^{2}\,e
487: ^{2\,\phi } - {\displaystyle \frac {1}{2}} \,\Delta ^{3}\,r^{
488: 2}\,\phi '^{2}\,\sigma ^{
489: 2}\,e^{2\,\phi },\\
490: {A_{2 \,4}} & = & - {\displaystyle \frac {1}{2}} \,\Delta ^{3}
491: \,r^{2}\,\phi '\,\sigma
492: ^{2}\,e^{2\,\phi } + 3\,\Delta ^{3}\,\Delta ' - \Delta '\,\sigma '^{2}\,\Delta '^{2},\\
493: {B_{2 \,3}} & = & - {\displaystyle \frac {3}{4}} \,\Delta
494: ^{2}\,r^{2}\,\phi '^{2}
495: \,\sigma ^{2}\,e^{2\,\phi } - {\displaystyle \frac {1}{2}
496: } \,\sigma ^{4}\,e^{2\,\phi }\,\Delta \\
497: & + & {\displaystyle \frac {1}{2}} \,r\,\Delta '\,\sigma ^{2}\,e^{2\,\phi
498: }\,\Delta - 2\,\phi '\,\Delta '\,\sigma ^{2}
499: \,\Delta + {\displaystyle \frac {3}{4}} \,\Delta ^{2}\,
500: \sigma ^{2}\,e^{2\,\phi } \\
501: & + & 9\,\Delta ^{2}\,\phi '\,\Delta ',\\
502: {B_{2 \,4}} & = & 3\,\Delta ^{3}\,\phi ' - \phi '\,
503: \sigma ^{2}\,\Delta ^{2} + {\displaystyle \frac {1}{4}} \,r
504: \,\sigma ^{2}\,e^{2\,\phi }\,\Delta ^{2},\\
505: {C_{2 \,3}} & = & {\displaystyle \frac {1}{2}} \,\Delta ^{3}\,\sigma \,e^{2\,\phi } - {\displaystyle \frac {1}{2
506: }} \,\Delta ^{3}\,r^{2}\,\phi '^{2}\,\sigma \,e^{2\,\phi } \\
507: & - & \sigma ^{3}\,e
508: ^{2\,\phi }\,\Delta ^{2} + {\displaystyle \frac {1}{2}} \,r\,\Delta '\,\sigma '\,e^{2\,\phi
509: }\,\Delta ^{2} - 2\,\phi '\,\Delta '\,\sigma \,
510: \Delta ^{2},\\
511: {A_{1 \,1}} & = & - \sigma ^{5} + \sigma ^{3}\,\Delta,\\
512: {A_{1 \,3}} & = & {\displaystyle \frac {1}{2}} \,r^{2}\,\phi '^{2}\,\sigma ^{3}\,e^{2\,
513: \phi }\,\Delta ^{2} - {\displaystyle \frac {1}{2}} \,r\,\sigma '\,\sigma ^{2}\,e^{
514: 2\,\phi }\,\Delta ^{2},\\
515: {A_{1 \,4}} & = & - 3\,\Delta ^{3}\,\sigma ' + \sigma '\,\sigma ^{2}\,\Delta ^{2} + {\displaystyle
516: \frac {1}{2}} \,r^{2}\,\phi '\,\sigma ^{3}\,e^{2\,\phi }\,\Delta ^{2} \\
517: & - & 4\,\Delta ^{3}\,\phi '\,\sigma + 4\,\phi '\,\sigma ^{3}\,\Delta ^{2} ,\\
518: {A_{1 \,5}} & = & - \sigma ^{3}\,\Delta ^{2} + \Delta ^{3
519: }\,\sigma ,\\
520: {B_{1 \,3}} & = & - {\displaystyle \frac {1}{2}} \,r\,\sigma '\,\sigma ^{2}\,e^{
521: 2\,\phi }\,\Delta - 2\,\phi ''\,\sigma ^{3}\,\Delta \\
522: & + & {\displaystyle \frac {1}{2}} \,r^{2}\,\phi '^{2}\,\sigma ^{3}\,e^{2\,
523: \phi }\,\Delta + 3\,\Delta ^{2}\,\phi ''\,\sigma \\
524: & - & 9\,\Delta ^{2}\,\phi '\,\sigma ' + 2\,\phi '\,\sigma '\,\sigma ^{2}\,
525: \Delta \\
526: & - & 6\,\Delta ^{2}\,\phi '^{2}\,\sigma + 4\,\phi '^{2}\,\sigma ^{3}\,\Delta ,\\
527: {C_{1 \,3}} & = & \Delta ^{3}\,\phi '' - 2\,\Delta ^{3}\,\phi '^{2} - 3\,\phi ''\,\sigma ^{2}\,\Delta ^{2} \\
528: & + & 2\,\phi '\,\sigma '\,\sigma \,\Delta^{2} - {\displaystyle \frac {1}{2}} \,r\,\sigma '\,\sigma \,e^{2\,\phi }\,\Delta
529: ^{2} \\
530: & + & {\displaystyle \frac {3}{4}} \,\Delta ^{2}\,r^{
531: 2}\,\phi '^{2}\,\sigma ^{2}\,e^{2\,\phi } + 6\,\phi'^{2}\,\sigma ^{2}\,\Delta ^{2},\\
532: {C_{1 \,4}} & = & \phi '\,
533: \sigma ^{2}\,\Delta ^{2} - {\displaystyle \frac {1}{4}} \,r
534: \,\sigma ^{2}\,e^{2\,\phi }\,\Delta ^{2} - 3\,\Delta ^{3}\,\phi '.\\
535: \end{eqnarray*}
536:
537: \small
538:
539: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
540:
541: \bibitem{alex97}
542: S.Alexeev, M.Pomazanov, Phys.Rev. {\bf D55}, 2110 (1997).
543:
544: \bibitem{alex98}
545: S.Alexeyev and M.Sazhin, Gen. Relativ. and Grav. {\bf
546: 8}, 1187 (1998).
547:
548: \bibitem{khovansk}
549: S.Alexeev, O.Khovanskaya, Gravitation and Cosmology, {\bf Vol.6} No 1, 14 (2000).
550:
551: \bibitem{mark66}
552: M.Markov, JETP {\bf 51} 878 (1966).
553:
554: \bibitem{mark79}
555: M.Markov and V.Frolov, Pisma v Astron. Zhurnal (Astronomy Letters) {\bf 29} 372 (1979).
556:
557: \bibitem{khlop2000}
558: S.Rubin, M.Khlopov, A.Sakharov, Phys. Rev. {\bf D62} 08350 (2000).
559:
560: \bibitem{my}
561: S.Alexeyev, A.Barrau, G.Boudoul, O.Khovanskaya, M.Sazhin, "Black Hole Relicts in String Gravity: last Stages of Hawking Evaporation" (in preparation).
562:
563: \bibitem{kanti}
564: P.Kanti, N.Mavromatos, J.Rizos, K.Tamvakis and E.Winstanley, Phys. Rev. {\bf D57}, 6255 (1998).
565:
566: \bibitem{jap}
567: T.Torii, K.-i.Maeda, Phys. Rev. {\bf D58}, 084004-1 (1998).
568:
569: \bibitem{tach}
570: K.-i.Maeda, T.Tachizawa, T.Torii and T.Maki, Phys. Rev. Lett {\bf 72}, 450 (1994).
571: \end{thebibliography}
572:
573: \end{document}
574: