1: %%%			Last revised 16 X 2002 

2: %%%	figures: fintt.eps, finrad.eps, finang.eps, zbiorczy.eps

3: %%% centering

4: %%% includegraphics[width=11cm]{fintt.eps}

5: 

6: 

7: \documentstyle[amssymb,prd,aps,tighten,epsfig]{revtex}

8: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

9: %TCIDATA{OutputFilter=LATEX.DLL}

10: %TCIDATA{LastRevised=Sat Oct 19 16:06:44 2002}

11: %TCIDATA{<META NAME="GraphicsSave" CONTENT="32">}

12: %TCIDATA{Language=American English}

13: %TCIDATA{CSTFile=revtex.cst}

14: 

15: \def\rcos {r^{SDS}_{CH}}

16: \def\rs {r^{SDS}_{EH}}

17: \def\ke {\kappa_{SDS}}

18: \def\re {r_{EH}}

19: \def\ra {r_{AH}}

20: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}

21: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}

22: \newcommand{\ben}{\begin{eqnarray}

23: \displaystyle}

24: \newcommand{\een}{\end{eqnarray}}

25: \newcommand{\la}{{\lambda}}

26: \newcommand{\ta}{{\tilde a}}

27: \newcommand{\si}{{\sigma}}

28: \newcommand{\th}{{\theta}}

29: \newcommand{\C}{{\cal C}}

30: \newcommand{\D}{{\cal D}}

31: \newcommand{\cF}{{\cal F}}

32: \newcommand{\cR}{{\cal R}}

33: \newcommand{\cH}{{\cal H}}

34: \newcommand{\eeo}{\cO ({1 \over E})}

35: \newcommand{\G}{{\cal G}}

36: \newcommand{\cL}{{\cal L}}

37: \newcommand{\T}{{\cal T}}

38: \newcommand{\M}{{\cal M}}

39: \newcommand{\p}{\partial}

40: \newcommand{\na}{\nabla}

41: \newcommand{\ssum}{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^3}

42: \newcommand{\dssum}{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^2}

43: \newcommand{\tal}{{\tilde \alpha}}

44: \newcommand{\tom}{{\tilde \omega}}

45: \newcommand{\tr}{{\tilde \rho}}

46: \newcommand{\tir}{{\tilde r}}

47: \newcommand{\rp}{r_{+}}

48: \newcommand{\hr}{{\hat r}}

49: \newcommand{\rv}{{r_{v}}}

50: \newcommand{\dr}{{d \over d \hr}}

51: \newcommand{\dR}{{d \over d R}}

52: \newcommand{\hhf}{{\hat \phi}}

53: \newcommand{\hhM}{{\hat M}}

54: \newcommand{\hhQ}{{\hat Q}}

55: \newcommand{\hht}{{\hat t}}

56: \newcommand{\hhr}{{\hat r}}

57: \newcommand{\hhS}{{\hat \Sigma}}

58: \newcommand{\hhD}{{\hat \Delta}}

59: \newcommand{\hhm}{{\hat \mu}}

60: \newcommand{\hro}{{\hat \rho}}

61: \newcommand{\hhz}{{\hat z}}

62: \newcommand{\tB}{{\tilde B}}

63: \newcommand{\hT}{\hat T}

64: \newcommand{\tT}{\tilde T}

65: \newcommand{\hC}{\hat C}

66: \newcommand{\ep}{\epsilon}

67: \newcommand{\bep}{\bar \epsilon}

68: \newcommand{\La}{\Lambda}

69: \newcommand{\Om}{\Omega}

70: \newcommand{\ga}{\gamma}

71: \newcommand{\hth}{\hat \theta}

72: \def\sn#1#2#3{{\sum_{{#3}={#1}}^{#2}}}

73: \def\DD#1#2#3#4{{{\partial {#1}^{#2}\over \partial {#3}^{#4}}}}

74: \def\WeylS#1#2#3#4{C^{{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}}C_{{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}}}

75: \def\RiemS#1#2#3#4{R^{{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}}R_{{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}}}

76: \def\RiccS#1#2{R^{{#1}{#2}}R_{{#1}{#2}}}

77: 

78: \begin{document}

79: \draft

80: \title{Quantized massive scalar fields in the spacetime of a charged dilatonic

81: black hole}

82: \author{Jerzy Matyjasek}

83: \address{Institute of Physics, \\

84: Maria Curie-Sk\l odowska University,\\

85: pl. Marii Curie - Sk\l odowskiej 1, 20-031 Lublin, Poland\\

86: matyjase@tytan.umcs.lublin.pl\\

87: jurek@kft.umcs.lublin.pl}

88: \maketitle

89: 

90: \begin{abstract}

91: Employing the approximate effective action constructed from the coincidence

92: limit of the Hadamard-Minakshisundaram-DeWitt (HaMiDeW) coefficient $a_{3},$

93: the renormalized stress-energy tensor of the quantized massive scalar field

94: in the spacetime of a static and electrically charged dilatonic black hole

95: is calculated. Special attention is paid to the minimally and conformally

96: coupled fields propagating in geometries with $a=1,$ and to the power

97: expansion of the general stress-energy tensor for small values of charge. A

98: compact expression for the trace of the stress-energy tensor is presented.

99: \end{abstract}

100: 

101: \vskip0.8cm \noindent {PACS numbers: 04.62.+v, 04.70.Dy}

102: 

103: \preprint{} \baselineskip=18pt

104: 

105: \section{introduction}

106: 

107: According to our present understanding the physical content of quantum field

108: theory formulated in a spacetime describing black hole is contained in the

109: renormalized stress-energy tensor, $\langle T^{ab}\rangle ,$ evaluated in a

110: physically motivated state \cite{pcwd}. And although interesting in its own,

111: the stress-energy tensor plays a crucial role in various applications, most

112: important of which is the problem of back reaction on the metric. Indeed,

113: treating the stress-energy tensor as a source term of the semi-classical

114: Einstein fields equations, one may, in principle, investigate the evolution

115: of the system unless the quantum gravity effects become dominant.

116: Unfortunately, this programme is hard to execute as the semi-classical field

117: equations comprise rather complicated set of nonlinear partial differential

118: equations, and, moreover, it requires knowledge of functional dependence of $%

119: \langle T^{ab}\rangle $ on a wide class of metrics. It is natural therefore

120: that in order to answer -- at least partially -- this question, one should

121: refer either to approximations or to numerical methods.

122: 

123: It seems that for the massive fields in a large mass limit, i.e., when the

124: Compton length, $l_{C},$ is much smaller than the characteristic radius of

125: curvature, ${\Bbb L},$ (where the latter means any characteristic length

126: scale of the spacetime), the approximation based on the asymptotic

127: Schwinger-DeWitt expansion is of the required generality~\cite

128: {Julian,Bryce1,Bryce2}. Since the nonlocal contribution to the effective

129: action could be neglected it is expected that the method yields reasonable

130: results provided the gravitational field is weak and its temporal changes

131: remain small. Despite of the above restrictions there are still a wide class

132: of geometries in which the approximation could be successfully applied. 

133: 

134: For a neutral massive scalar field with an arbitrary curvature coupling

135: satisfying 

136: \begin{equation}

137: \left( \Box \,-\,\xi R\,-\,m^{2}\right) \phi \,=\,0,  \label{wave}

138: \end{equation}

139: where $\xi $ is the coupling constant and $m$ is the mass of the field, the

140: approximate renormalized effective action, $W_{R},$ may be expanded in

141: powers of $m^{-2}$ \cite{fz1,fz2,fz3}. The n-th term of the expansion

142: involves coincidence limit of the `HaMiDeW' coefficient $\left[ a_{n}\right] 

143: $ \cite{Gibbons1} constructed solely from the curvature tensor its covariant

144: derivatives up to $2n-2$ order and contractions \cite

145: {Bryce1,sakai,gil1,gil2,AvraPhD,Avraros,Avranucl,Amsterdamski}. As the

146: complexity of the `HaMiDeW' coefficients rapidly grows with increasing $n$

147: their practical use is limited to $n=3,$ perhaps $n=4$. Moreover, it should

148: be emphasised that the Schwinger-DeWitt expansion is asymptotic and adding more

149: terms does not necessarily improve the approximation. Here we shall confine

150: ourselves to the simplest yet calculationally involved case $n=3,$ in which

151: the approximate effective action could be written as

152: \begin{equation}

153: W_{R}=\frac{1}{32\pi ^{2}}\int d^{4}x\sqrt{g}\frac{1}{m^{2}}\left[ a_{3}%

154: \right].  \label{weff}

155: \end{equation}

156: 

157: Having at one's disposal the approximation of the renormalized effective

158: action, the stress-energy tensor could be evaluated by means of the standard

159: formula 

160: \begin{equation}

161: \frac{2}{\sqrt{g}}\frac{\delta }{\delta g_{ab}}W_{R}=\langle T^{ab}\rangle .

162: \end{equation}

163: Since the coefficient $\left[ a_{3}\right] $ is rather complicated so is the

164: stress-energy tensor and the question arose of a practical applicability of

165: the thus obtained results. Fortunately it could be used in a number of

166: physically interesting and important cases. The method has been employed by

167: Frolov and Zel'nikov in a series of papers \cite{fz1,fz2,fz3} devoted to

168: construction of $\langle T^{ab}\rangle $ of the massive scalar, spinor and

169: vector fields in vacuum type-D spacetimes and generalized recently to

170: arbitrary geometries in \cite{kocio1,kocio2}. General formulas describing $%

171: \langle T^{ab}\rangle$ consist of over 100 local terms.

172: 

173: The effective action technique that we employ in this paper requires the 

174: metric of the spacetime to be positively defined. Hence, to obtain the physical 

175: stress-energy tensor one has to analytically continue at the final 

176: stage of calculations its Euclidean counterpart.

177: 

178: An alternative approach based on the WKB approximation of the solutions to

179: the radial equation and summation of the mode functions has been developed

180: by Anderson, Hiscock, and Samuel \cite{AHS}, who, among other things,

181: succeeded in construction of the general form of the stress-energy tensor of

182: the scalar field in a large mass limit in a static and spherically-symmetric

183: geometry. Both approaches give, as expected, identical results and the

184: detailed numerical analyses carried out by this authors show that for $%

185: mM\gtrsim 2$ ($M$ is the black hole mass) the accuracy of the

186: Schwinger-DeWitt approximation in the Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m geometry is

187: quite good (1\% or better)~\cite{paul2}. The Schwinger-DeWitt method has

188: been employed in various contexts in \cite

189: {kocio1,kocio2,AHS,paul2,wormhole,inside,kocio3,kocio4,Kof1,Kof2}. The case

190: of the massive spinor field is currently actively investigated \cite

191: {paulhalf}.

192: 

193: In this article we shall study the stress-energy tensor of the quantized

194: massive scalar field with an arbitrary curvature coupling in a background of

195: the charged dilatonic black holes which is the solutions of the coupled

196: system of Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton equations. A complete set of this equations

197: may be easily derived from the action: 

198: \begin{equation}

199: S=\int d^{4}x\,\sqrt{-g}\left[ R-2\left( \nabla \phi \right) ^{2}-e^{-2a\phi

200: }F^{2}\right] ,  \label{string_action}

201: \end{equation}

202: where $\phi $ is the massless dilatonic field, $F$ is the strength of the

203: Maxwell field ($F_{ab}=2\nabla _{\lbrack a}A_{b]}$) and $a$ is the coupling

204: constant. For each value of the parameter $a$ there exists a black hole

205: solution depending on the electric charge and the mass~\cite

206: {gibbons2,horowitz}. The choice $a=1$ corresponds to low energy limit of the

207: string effective action, $a=\sqrt{3}$ to the four dimensional effective

208: model reduced from the Kaluza-Klein theory in five dimensions, and the

209: Einstein-Maxwell system is obtained with $a=0.$ Here we ignore the higher

210: curvature contribution to $S$ \cite{Myers1,Myers2}, as for example the

211: Gauss-Bonnet term.

212: 

213: Various properties of charged dilatonic black holes have been examined in a

214: numerous papers. On the other hand however, quantum effects in 4D dilatonic

215: black hole are -- to the best of my knowledge -- practically unexplored.

216: This does not mean that this group of problems is uninteresting: belonging

217: to the realm of the low-energy approximation to string theory ($a=1)$ or the

218: Kaluza-Klein theory ($a=\sqrt{3}$), the dilatonic black holes would interact

219: with various quantized fields. The main obstacle preventing construction of

220: the renormalized stress-energy tensor is the computational complexity of the

221: problem.

222: 

223: The evaporation process of the massless scalar field noninteracting with a

224: dilaton field has been analysed in \cite{koga1,cqg} whereas the field

225: fluctuation, $\langle \phi ^{2}\rangle ,$ of the minimally coupled massless

226: scalar field in the vicinity of the event horizon of the dilatonic black

227: hole has been studied by Shiraishi \cite{kyioshi}. Specifically, it was

228: shown that the emission rate of the Hawking radiation blows up near the

229: extremality limit for $a>1.$ On the other hand it is finite for $a=1$ and

230: zero for $a<1.$ The field fluctuation diverges for $a>0$ for the extremal

231: configuration.

232: 

233: \section{The geometry}

234: 

235: Functionally differentiating $S$ with respect to the metric tensor, dilaton

236: field, and Maxwell field one obtains the system of equations of motion that

237: could be solved exactly. Static and spherically-symmetric solution has been

238: found by Gibbons and Maeda~\cite{gibbons2}, and by Garfinkle, Horowitz and

239: Strominger~\cite{horowitz}: 

240: \begin{equation}

241: ds^{2}=A\left( r\right) dt^{2}+%

242: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{dr^{2}}{A\left( r\right) }}%

243: %BeginExpansion

244: {\displaystyle{dr^{2} \over A\left( r\right) }}%

245: %EndExpansion

246: +B^{2}\left( r\right) d\Omega ^{2},  \label{el1}

247: \end{equation}

248: where 

249: \begin{equation}

250: A\left( r\right) =\left( 1-%

251: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{r_{+}}{r}}%

252: %BeginExpansion

253: {\displaystyle{r_{+} \over r}}%

254: %EndExpansion

255: \right) \left( 1-%

256: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{r_{-}}{r}}%

257: %BeginExpansion

258: {\displaystyle{r_{-} \over r}}%

259: %EndExpansion

260: \right) ^{%

261: %TCIMACRO{\tfrac{1-a^{2}}{1+a^{2}}}%

262: %BeginExpansion

263: {\textstyle{1-a^{2} \over 1+a^{2}}}%

264: %EndExpansion

265: }  \label{el2}

266: \end{equation}

267: and 

268: \begin{equation}

269: B^{2}=r^{2}\left( 1-%

270: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{r_{-}}{r}}%

271: %BeginExpansion

272: {\displaystyle{r_{-} \over r}}%

273: %EndExpansion

274: \right) ^{%

275: %TCIMACRO{\tfrac{2a^{2}}{1+a^{2}}}%

276: %BeginExpansion

277: {\textstyle{2a^{2} \over 1+a^{2}}}%

278: %EndExpansion

279: }.  \label{el3}

280: \end{equation}

281: The integration constants $r_{+}$ and $r_{-}$ are related to the mass and

282: charge of the dilatonic black hole according to 

283: \begin{equation}

284: 2M=r_{+}+\left( 

285: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{1-a^{2}}{1+a^{2}}}%

286: %BeginExpansion

287: {\displaystyle{1-a^{2} \over 1+a^{2}}}%

288: %EndExpansion

289: \right) r_{-}  \label{rr1}

290: \end{equation}

291: and 

292: \begin{equation}

293: Q^{2}=%

294: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{r_{+}r_{-}}{1+a^{2}} }%

295: %BeginExpansion

296: {\displaystyle{r_{+}r_{-} \over 1+a^{2}}}.%

297: %EndExpansion

298: \label{rr2}

299: \end{equation}

300: The dilaton field is given by 

301: \begin{equation}

302: e^{2a\phi }=\left( 1-%

303: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{r_{-}}{r}}%

304: %BeginExpansion

305: {\displaystyle{r_{-} \over r}}%

306: %EndExpansion

307: \right) ^{%

308: %TCIMACRO{\tfrac{2a^{2}}{1+a^{2}}}%

309: %BeginExpansion

310: {\textstyle{2a^{2} \over 1+a^{2}}}%

311: %EndExpansion

312: },

313: \end{equation}

314: whereas the electric field is simply $F=%

315: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{Q}{r^{2}}}%

316: %BeginExpansion

317: {\displaystyle{Q \over r^{2}}}%

318: %EndExpansion

319: dt\wedge dr.$ Inspection of the line element shows that the event horizon is

320: located at $r_{+};$ at $r=$ $r_{-}$ one has a coordinate singularity that

321: could be ignored so long one considers region $r\geq r_{+}>r_{-}.$ The

322: choice $a=0$ leads to the Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m solution. At $\left|

323: Q\right| /M=\left( 1+a^{2}\right) ^{1/2}$, a case usually addressed to as an

324: extremal black hole, the event horizon and $r_{-}$ coincides and in this

325: limit the surface $r=r_{+}$ $=r_{-}$ is zero except $a=0.$ Although more

326: realistic models require massive $\phi $ field, the dilatonic solutions (\ref

327: {el1}-\ref{el3}) are of principal interest as they provide useful models for

328: studies of the consequences of modifications of the geometries of the

329: classical black holes. Finally, observe that the Kretschmann scalar $K$

330: computed at the event horizon near the extremality limit behaves as 

331: \begin{equation}

332: K\sim \left( r_{+}-r_{-}\right) ^{-%

333: %TCIMACRO{\tfrac{4a^{2}}{1+a^{2}}}%

334: %BeginExpansion

335: {\textstyle{4a^{2} \over 1+a^{2}}}%

336: %EndExpansion

337: }.

338: \end{equation}

339: 

340: \section{The renormalized stress-energy tensor}

341: 

342: \subsection{Approximate effective action}

343: 

344: In the framework of the Schwinger-DeWitt approximation the first order

345: effective action of the massive scalar field is constructed

346: from the coincidence limit of the coefficient $a_{3}\left( x,x^{\prime

347: }\right) .$ Inserting $\left[ a_{3}\right] $ as given in Appendix into (\ref

348: {weff}), integrating by parts and finally making use of the elementary

349: properties of the Riemann tensor, after necessary simplifications one has 

350: \cite{AvraPhD,Avraros,Avranucl}: 

351: \begin{eqnarray}

352: W_{ren}^{(1)}\, &=&\frac{1}{192\pi ^{2}m^{2}}\int d^{4}x\sqrt{g}\left[ {{%

353: \frac{1}{2}}}\left( \eta ^{2}-{{\frac{\eta }{15}}}-{{\frac{1}{315}}}\right)

354: R\Box R\,+\,{\frac{1}{140}}R_{pq}\Box R^{pq}-{\eta }^{3}R^{3}\,+\,{\frac{1}{%

355: 30}\eta }RR_{pq}R^{pq}\,-\,{\frac{1}{30}\eta }RR_{pqab}R^{pqab}\right. 

356: \nonumber \\

357: &&\left. -{\frac{8}{945}}R_{q}^{p}R_{a}^{q}R_{p}^{a}\,+\,{\frac{2}{315}}%

358: R^{pq}R_{ab}R_{~p~q}^{a~b}\,+\,\,{\frac{1}{1260}}R_{pq}R_{~cab}^{p}R^{qcab}+{%

359: \frac{17}{7560}}{R_{ab}}^{pq}{R_{pq}}^{cd}{R_{cd}}^{ab}-\,{\frac{1}{270}}%

360: R_{~p~q}^{a~b}R_{~c~d}^{p~q}R\right]  \nonumber \\

361: &=&{{\frac{1}{192\pi ^{2}m^{2}}}}\sum_{i=1}^{10}\alpha _{i}W_{\left(

362: i\right) },  \label{ww}

363: \end{eqnarray}

364: were $\eta =\xi -1\slash6$ and $\alpha _{i\text{ }}$ are equal to the

365: numerical coefficients that stand in front of the geometrical terms in the

366: right hand side of the equation (\ref{ww}).

367: 

368: Differentiating functionally $W_{ren}^{\left( 1\right) }$ with respect to a

369: metric tensor one obtains rather complicated expression which schematically

370: may be written as 

371: \begin{equation}

372: \,\langle T^{ab}\rangle =\sum_{i=1}^{10}\alpha _{i}\tilde{T}^{\left(

373: i\right) ab}={{\frac{1}{96\pi ^{2}m^{2}\sqrt{g}}}}\sum_{i=1}^{10}\alpha _{i}{%

374: {\frac{\delta W_{\left( i\right) }}{\delta g_{ab}}}}=T^{\left( 0\right)

375: ab}+\eta T^{\left( 1\right) ab}+\eta ^{2}T^{\left( 2\right) ab}+\eta

376: ^{3}T^{\left( 3\right) ab},  \label{ten}

377: \end{equation}

378: where each $\tilde{T}^{\left( i\right) ab}$ is constructed solely from the

379: curvature tensor, its covariant derivatives and contractions. Because of the

380: complexity of the resulting stress-energy tensor it will be not presented

381: here and for its full form as well as the technical details the reader is

382: referred to \cite{kocio1,kocio2}. The result may be easily extended to

383: fields of other spins as the appropriate tensors differ by numerical

384: coefficients $\alpha _{i}$ only.

385: 

386: The coincidence limit of $a_{4}\left( x,x^{\prime }\right) $ is also known:

387: it has been calculated by Avramidi~\cite{AvraPhD,Avraros,Avranucl} and by

388: Amsterdamski, Berkin and O'Connor~\cite{Amsterdamski}. In principle, the

389: above procedure could be extended to include $m^{-4}$ terms and the general

390: structure of $\left[ a_{4}\right] $ indicates that the second-order

391: stress-energy tensor divides naturally into five terms $\sum_{i=0}^{4}\eta

392: ^{i}T^{\left( i\right) ab}.$ Unfortunately, since the effective action

393: constructed from $\left[ a_{4}\right] $ is extremely complicated, so is its

394: functional derivative and the practical use of the thus obtained result may be

395: a real challenge. However, $\left[ a_{4}\right] $ still could be employed in

396: the analyses of the field fluctuation.

397: 

398: In order to simplify our discussion let us define $q=\left| Q\right| /M$, $%

399: x_{\pm }=r_{\pm }/M$ and $x=r/M$. The Schwinger-DeWitt technique may be used

400: when the characteristic radius of curvature in much greater than the Compton

401: length. Simple considerations indicate that for $r\gg r_{+}$ $\ $it could be

402: used for arbitrary value of $a.$ Assuming that ${\Bbb L}$ is related to the

403: Kretschmann scalar as 

404: \begin{equation}

405: R_{a b c d} R^{a b c d} \sim {\Bbb L}^{-4}

406: \end{equation}

407: the condition of applicability of the approximation near the event horizon

408: could be written as 

409: \begin{equation}

410: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{2c}{M^{2}x_{+}^{3}}}%

411: %BeginExpansion

412: {\displaystyle{2c \over M^{2}x_{+}^{3}}}%

413: %EndExpansion

414: \left( x_{+}-x_{-}\right) ^{-%

415: %TCIMACRO{\tfrac{2a^{2}}{1+a^{2}}}%

416: %BeginExpansion

417: {\textstyle{2a^{2} \over 1+a^{2}}}%

418: %EndExpansion

419: }\ll m^{2},  \label{cond1}

420: \end{equation}

421: where $c^{2}=2x_{-}^{2}+\left[ x_{-}-\left( 1+a^{2}\right) x_{+}\right]

422: ^{2}. $ It is evident that for $a>0$ the Schwinger-DeWitt approximation is

423: inapplicable for $r_{+}$ close to $r_{-}.$ For the extremal

424: Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m black hole this condition becomes $M^{2}m^{2}\gg 2%

425: \sqrt{2}.$

426: 

427: The temperature of the dilatonic black hole obtained by means of standard

428: methods is given by 

429: \begin{mathletters}

430: \begin{equation}

431: T_{H}=%

432: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{1}{4\pi Mx_{+}}}%

433: %BeginExpansion

434: {\displaystyle{1 \over 4\pi Mx_{+}}}%

435: %EndExpansion

436: \left( 1-%

437: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{x_{-}}{x_{+}}}%

438: %BeginExpansion

439: {\displaystyle{x_{-} \over x_{+}}}%

440: %EndExpansion

441: \right) ^{%

442: %TCIMACRO{\tfrac{1-a^{2}}{1+a^{2}}}%

443: %BeginExpansion

444: {\textstyle{1-a^{2} \over 1+a^{2}}}%

445: %EndExpansion

446: }  \label{temp}

447: \end{equation}

448: and for given $q$ it depends on the dilatonic coupling. Inspection of (\ref

449: {temp}) shows that 

450: \end{mathletters}

451: \begin{eqnarray*}

452: T_{H} &<&(8\pi M)^{-1}\qquad \left( a<1\right) , \\

453: T_{H} &=&\left( 8\pi M\right) ^{-1}\qquad \left( a=1\right) , \\

454: T_{H} &>&\left( 8\pi M\right) ^{-1}\qquad \left( a>1\right) .

455: \end{eqnarray*}

456: The temperature of the extremal configuration is zero for $a<1,$ takes the

457: same value as for a Schwarzschild black hole for $a=1,$ and diverges for $%

458: a>0.$ Moreover, it is easily seen that the condition $T_{H}\ll m$ is

459: violated for $a>1$ near the extremality limit.

460: 

461: \subsection{General case}

462: 

463: Solving the system (\ref{rr1}) and (\ref{rr2}) one easily obtains 

464: \begin{equation}

465: x_{+}=1+\sqrt{1-\left( 1-a^{2}\right) q^{2}}

466: \end{equation}

467: and 

468: \begin{equation}

469: x_{-}=%

470: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{1+a^{2}}{1-a^{2}}}%

471: %BeginExpansion

472: {\displaystyle{1+a^{2} \over 1-a^{2}}}%

473: %EndExpansion

474: \left( 1-\sqrt{1-\left( 1-a^{2}\right) q^{2}}\right) .

475: \end{equation}

476: Before proceeding further let us observe that $R=0$ for $a=0,$ and,

477: consequently, $\delta W_{\left( 1\right) }/\delta g_{ab}$ and $\delta

478: W_{\left( 3\right) }/\delta g_{ab}$ is zero. The stress-energy tensor has

479: therefore a simple form 

480: \begin{equation}

481: \langle T_{a}^{b}\rangle ^{a=0}=T_{a}^{\left( 0\right) b}+\eta T_{a}^{\left(

482: 1\right) b}.  \label{setrn}

483: \end{equation}

484: On the other hand, the curvature scalar vanishes at the event horizon for

485: any $a$ and is ${\cal O}\left( q^{4}\right) $ for small $q$ elsewhere.

486: Moreover, since $\partial _{r}R$ is the only nonzero component of $\nabla

487: _{a}R$ one concludes that $T_{a}^{\left( 3\right) b}\left( r_{+}\right) =0$

488: and is negligible in the closest vicinity of $r_{+}.$ It is because the only

489: nonvanishing in this limit term is proportional to 

490: \begin{equation}

491: \nabla _{a}R\nabla ^{b}R-\left( \nabla R\right) ^{2}\delta _{a}^{b}.

492: \end{equation}

493: A closer examination indicates that $T_{a}^{\left( 3\right) b}$ is $O\left(

494: q^{8}\right) .$ Similarly, one expects that for small $q$ the term $%

495: T_{a}^{\left( 2\right) b}$ is of order $O\left( q^{4}\right) .$ On the other

496: hand, the contribution of the last two terms in the right hand side of

497: equation (\ref{ten}) could be made arbitrarily large by a suitable choice of

498: the curvature coupling. It should be noted however that such values of $\eta 

499: $ are clearly unphysical and should be rejected.

500: 

501: Restricting to the exterior region and calculating components of the Riemann

502: tensor, its contractions and covariant derivatives to the required order,

503: after some algebra one arrives at the rather complicated result, that for

504: obvious reasons will not be presented here. However it could be

505: schematically written in surprisingly simple form 

506: \begin{equation}

507: \langle T_{a}^{b}\rangle =%

508: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{p}{\left( 1+a^{2}\right) \,x^{15}}}%

509: %BeginExpansion

510: {\displaystyle{p \over \left( 1+a^{2}\right) \,x^{15}}}%

511: %EndExpansion

512: \left( 1-%

513: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{x_{-}}{x}}%

514: %BeginExpansion

515: {\displaystyle{x_{-} \over x}}%

516: %EndExpansion

517: \right) ^{-%

518: %TCIMACRO{\tfrac{3\left( 3a^{2}+1\right) }{1+a^{2}}}%

519: %BeginExpansion

520: {\textstyle{3\left( 3a^{2}+1\right)  \over 1+a^{2}}}%

521: %EndExpansion

522: }\sum_{ijk}d_{ijkb}^{a}\left[ \eta ,\,a^{2}\right] \,x^{i}x_{+}^{j}x_{-}^{k}

523: \label{schema}

524: \end{equation}

525: with $0\leq i\leq 7$, $0\leq j\leq 3$ and $0\leq k\leq 6$ subjected to the

526: condition $i+j+k=9.$ Here 

527: \begin{equation}

528: p=%

529: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{1}{192\pi ^{2}m^{2}M^{6}}}%

530: %BeginExpansion

531: {\displaystyle{1 \over 192\pi ^{2}m^{2}M^{6}}}%

532: %EndExpansion

533: .

534: \end{equation}

535: and $d_{ijkb}^{a}$ for given $a$ and $\eta $ are numerical coefficients.

536: Some extra work shows that the tensor (\ref{schema}) is covariantly

537: conserved and is regular for regular geometries. Moreover, the difference $%

538: \langle T_{t}^{t}\rangle -\langle T_{r}^{r}\rangle $ factors 

539: \begin{equation}

540: \langle T_{t}^{t}\rangle -\langle T_{r}^{r}\rangle =%

541: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{p}{\left( 1+a^{2}\right) \,x^{14}}}%

542: %BeginExpansion

543: {\displaystyle{p \over \left( 1+a^{2}\right) \,x^{14}}}%

544: %EndExpansion

545: \left( 1-%

546: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{x_{+}}{x}}%

547: %BeginExpansion

548: {\displaystyle{x_{+} \over x}}%

549: %EndExpansion

550: \right) \left( 1-%

551: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{x_{-}}{x}}%

552: %BeginExpansion

553: {\displaystyle{x_{-} \over x}}%

554: %EndExpansion

555: \right) ^{-%

556: %TCIMACRO{\tfrac{3\left( 3a^{2}+1\right) }{1+a^{2}}}%

557: %BeginExpansion

558: {\textstyle{3\left( 3a^{2}+1\right)  \over 1+a^{2}}}%

559: %EndExpansion

560: }f\left( x\right) ,  \label{fact}

561: \end{equation}

562: where the regular function $f\sim (x_{+}-x_{-})^{2}$ as $x_{-}\rightarrow

563: x_{+}$ and consequently within the domain of applicability of the

564: Schwinger-DeWitt approximation the stress-energy tensor is regular in a

565: freely falling frame.

566: 

567: It could be demonstrated by that the trace of the stress-energy tensor of

568: the massive scalar field has a simple form 

569: \begin{equation}

570: \langle T_{a}^{a}\rangle \,=\,{\frac{1}{16\pi ^{2}m^{2}}}\left\{ 3\left( \xi

571: -{\frac{1}{6}}\right) \Box \lbrack a_{2}]\,-\,[a_{3}]\right\} .  \label{slad}

572: \end{equation}

573: This equation together with 

574: \begin{equation}

575: \nabla _{b}T_{a}^{b}=0  \label{covcons}

576: \end{equation}

577: may serve as an independent check of the calculations. For conformally

578: coupled fields the trace is proportional to the coincidence limit of $%

579: [a_{3}]. $ We remark here that for conformally invariant massless scalar

580: field the anomalous trace is proportional to $[a_{2}];$ it should be noted

581: however, that (\ref{slad}) has been calculated for $\langle T_{a}^{b}\rangle 

582: $ given by (\ref{ten}) whereas the trace of the conformally invariant

583: massless fields is a general property of the regularized stress-energy

584: tensor.

585: 

586: Since the practical use of the general result is severely limited, it is

587: instructive to analyse the stress-energy tensor in some specific cases. In

588: the latter we shall confine our analysis to $0\,\leq a\,\leq \sqrt{3}$ with

589: the special emphasis put on the case $a=1.$ However, before proceeding to

590: examination of some concrete choices of $a$ let us analyse $\langle

591: T_{a}^{b}\rangle $ for small $q.$

592: 

593: \subsection{Arbitrary $a,$ $q\ll 1$}

594: 

595: Assuming $q\ll 1$, expanding $\langle T_{a}^{b}\rangle $ into a power series,

596: and finally collecting the terms with the like powers of $q$ one has

597: 

598: \begin{equation}

599: \,\langle T_{a}^{b}\rangle =\,\langle T_{a}^{b}\rangle ^{a=0}+%

600: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{a^{2}}{96\pi ^{2}m^{2}x^{10}M^{6}}}%

601: %BeginExpansion

602: {\displaystyle{a^{2} \over 96\pi ^{2}m^{2}x^{10}M^{6}}}%

603: %EndExpansion

604: (q^{2}t_{a}^{\left( 1\right) b}+q^{4}t_{a}^{\left( 2\right)

605: b}+q^{6}t_{a}^{\left( 3\right) b}+...),  \label{ser1}

606: \end{equation}

607: where $\langle T_{b}^{b}\rangle ^{a=0}$ is evaluated for $a=0$ and coincides

608: with the expression describing the stress-energy tensor in the geometry of

609: the Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m black hole~\cite{AHS,kocio1}. The explicit

610: expressions for the coefficients $t_{a}^{\left( i\right) b}$ as well as the

611: components of $\langle T_{b}^{b}\rangle ^{a=0}$ are listed in the appendix.

612: A closer examination shows that for $q\lesssim 0.7$ the expansion (\ref{ser1}%

613: ) reproduces the general result satisfactorily, and, moreover, for $%

614: q\lesssim 1/3$ the results weakly depend on the coupling $a.$ From (\ref

615: {ser1}) it is evident that for $a=0$ and $q=0$ the stress-energy tensor

616: reduces to the expression derived by Frolov and Zel'nikov in the geometry of

617: the Schwarzschild black hole~\cite{fz1,FrolovNovikov}.

618: 

619: \subsection{Dilatonic black hole $a=1$}

620: 

621: In this subsection we shall construct and investigate the stress-energy

622: tensor of the massive scalar field resulting from (\ref{schema}) for the

623: particular combinations of couplings. Consider $a=1.$ Since the second

624: factor in $A\left( r\right) $ vanishes, we expect considerable

625: simplifications as the event horizon is now located at $2M$ whereas the

626: `inner' one at $q^{2}M$. Indeed, defining $y=r/r_{+},$ equation (\ref{schema}%

627: ) could be written in a simple form: 

628: \begin{equation}

629: \langle T_{a}^{b}\rangle =%

630: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{p}{\left( 2y-q^{2}\right) ^{6}}}%

631: %BeginExpansion

632: {\displaystyle{p \over \left( 2y-q^{2}\right) ^{6}}}%

633: %EndExpansion

634: \sum_{ij}b_{ija}^{b}\left[ \eta \right] \,q^{2i}y^{-j-2}  \label{w1}

635: \end{equation}

636: with $0\leq i\leq 6$ and $0\leq j\leq 7,$ where $b_{ija}^{b}$ are numerical

637: coefficients. From (\ref{fact}) it could be shown that for any $\eta $ the

638: difference $\langle T_{t}^{t}\rangle -\langle T_{r}^{r}\rangle $ factorizes

639: as 

640: \begin{equation}

641: \langle T_{t}^{t}\rangle -\langle T_{r}^{r}\rangle =%

642: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{1-y}{y^{9}\left( q^{2}-2y\right) ^{6}}}%

643: %BeginExpansion

644: {\displaystyle{1-y \over y^{9}\left( q^{2}-2y\right) ^{6}}}%

645: %EndExpansion

646: f\left( y\right) ,

647: \end{equation}

648: where, for $0\leq q<\sqrt{2}$ the function $f\left( y\right) $ is regular at

649: the event horizon. Equation (\ref{w1}) could be contrasted to the analogous

650: expression evaluated in the Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m geometry $\left(

651: a=0\right) :$ 

652: \begin{equation}

653: \langle T_{a}^{b}\rangle =\frac{p}{y^{6}}\sum_{ij}c_{ija}^{b}\left[ \eta %

654: \right] q^{2i}y^{-j-2},  \label{w2}

655: \end{equation}

656: where $0\leq i\leq 3$, $0\leq j\leq 4$, and $c_{ija}^{b}$ are another set of

657: numerical coefficients.

658: 

659: To perform quantitative analysis however, we have to refer to exact

660: formulas. For $\eta =0$ it suffices to compute only $T_{a}^{\left( 0\right)

661: b}$ as the others terms do not contribute to the final result. After some

662: algebra one has

663: 

664: %%% konforemne sprzezenie

665: %% Ttt

666: \begin{eqnarray}

667: \langle T_{t}^{t}\rangle &=&%

668: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{p}{\left( 2y-q^{2}\right) ^{6}}}%

669: %BeginExpansion

670: {\displaystyle{p \over \left( 2y-q^{2}\right) ^{6}}}%

671: %EndExpansion

672: \left[ \frac{313}{210\,y^{3}}-\frac{19}{14\,y^{2}}-q^{2}\,\left( \frac{61}{%

673: 30\,y^{4}}-\frac{31}{70\,y^{3}}-\frac{9}{7\,y^{2}}\right) +q^{4}\,\left( 

674: \frac{143}{840\,y^{5}}+\frac{7313}{2520\,y^{4}}-\frac{577}{210\,y^{3}}-\frac{%

675: 1}{28\,y^{2}}\right) \right.  \nonumber \\

676: &&+q^{6}\,\left( \frac{1381}{1120\,y^{6}}-\frac{6607}{1680\,y^{5}}+\frac{1813%

677: }{720\,y^{4}}+\frac{1}{28\,y^{3}}\right) -q^{8}\,\left( \frac{9277}{%

678: 10080\,y^{7}}-\frac{43837}{20160\,y^{6}}+\frac{1007}{840\,y^{5}}+\frac{139}{%

679: 10080\,y^{4}}\right)  \nonumber \\

680: &&\left. +q^{10}\,\left( \frac{1817}{6720\,y^{8}}-\frac{479}{840\,y^{7}}+%

681: \frac{559}{1920\,y^{6}}+\frac{7}{2880\,y^{5}}\right) -q^{12}\,\left( \frac{%

682: 1783}{60480\,y^{9}}-\frac{473}{8064\,y^{8}}+\frac{11}{384\,y^{7}}+\frac{1}{%

683: 6912\,y^{6}}\right) \right]  \nonumber \\

684: &&  \label{dilconf1}

685: \end{eqnarray}

686: 

687: %%Trr

688: \begin{eqnarray}

689: \langle T_{r}^{r}\rangle &=&%

690: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{p}{\left( 2y-q^{2}\right) ^{6}}}%

691: %BeginExpansion

692: {\displaystyle{p \over \left( 2y-q^{2}\right) ^{6}}}%

693: %EndExpansion

694: \left[ \frac{1}{2\,y^{2}}-\frac{11}{30\,y^{3}}+q^{2}\,\left( \frac{47}{%

695: 42\,y^{4}}-\frac{353}{210\,y^{3}}+\frac{9}{35\,y^{2}}\right) -q^{4}\,\left( 

696: \frac{481}{280\,y^{5}}-\frac{7267}{2520\,y^{4}}+\frac{43}{45\,y^{3}}-\frac{11%

697: }{140\,y^{2}}\right) \right.  \nonumber \\

698: &&+q^{6}\,\left( \frac{895}{672\,y^{6}}-\frac{11687}{5040\,y^{5}}+\frac{103}{%

699: 112\,y^{4}}-\frac{11}{140\,y^{3}}\right) -q^{8}\,\left( \frac{61}{112\,y^{7}}%

700: -\frac{2143}{2240\,y^{6}}+\frac{2053}{5040\,y^{5}}-\frac{53}{1440\,y^{4}}%

701: \right)  \nonumber \\

702: &&\left. +q^{10}\,\left( \frac{2269}{20160\,y^{8}}-\frac{397}{2016\,y^{7}}+%

703: \frac{233}{2688\,y^{6}}-\frac{173}{20160\,y^{5}}\right) -q^{12}\,\left( 

704: \frac{139}{15120\,y^{9}}-\frac{91}{5760\,y^{8}}+\frac{1}{144\,y^{7}}-\frac{5%

705: }{6912\,y^{6}}\right) \right]  \nonumber \\

706: &&

707: \end{eqnarray}

708: 

709: %%Tang

710: and 

711: \begin{eqnarray}

712: \langle T_{\theta }^{\theta }\rangle &=&%

713: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{p}{\left( 2y-q^{2}\right) ^{6}}}%

714: %BeginExpansion

715: {\displaystyle{p \over \left( 2y-q^{2}\right) ^{6}}}%

716: %EndExpansion

717: \left[ \frac{367}{210\,y^{3}}-\frac{3}{2\,y^{2}}-q^{2}\,\left( \frac{367}{%

718: 70\,y^{4}}-\frac{1129}{210\,y^{3}}+\frac{27}{35\,y^{2}}\right)

719: +q^{4}\,\left( \frac{65}{8\,y^{5}}-\frac{4379}{420\,y^{4}}+\frac{146}{%

720: 45\,y^{3}}-\frac{33}{140\,y^{2}}\right) \right.  \nonumber \\

721: &&-q^{6}\,\left( \frac{11099}{1680\,y^{6}}-\frac{11749}{1260\,y^{5}}+\frac{%

722: 1423}{420\,y^{4}}-\frac{33}{140\,y^{3}}\right) +q^{8}\,\left( \frac{59011}{%

723: 20160\,y^{7}}-\frac{29209}{6720\,y^{6}}+\frac{1907}{1120\,y^{5}}-\frac{643}{%

724: 5040\,y^{4}}\right)  \nonumber \\

725: &&\left. -q^{10}\,\left( \frac{13589}{20160\,y^{8}}-\frac{6943}{6720\,y^{7}}+%

726: \frac{8551}{20160\,y^{6}}-\frac{173}{5040\,y^{5}}\right) +q^{12}\,\left( 

727: \frac{7669}{120960\,y^{9}}-\frac{143}{1440\,y^{8}}+\frac{97}{2304\,y^{7}}-%

728: \frac{25}{6912\,y^{6}}\right) \right]  \nonumber \\

729: &&  \label{dilconf3}

730: \end{eqnarray}

731: In fact it suffices to know only one component of the stress-energy tensor,

732: say $\langle T_{\theta }^{\theta }\rangle ,$ as the remaining ones could be

733: easily obtained solving equations (\ref{slad}) and (\ref{covcons}) and

734: putting the integration constant to zero.

735: 

736: Despite its similarity with the Schwarzschild line element, the nonextremal $%

737: a=1$ dilatonic \ black holes have much in common with the

738: Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m solution. We shall, therefore, address the question

739: of how the differences between the geometry of the Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m

740: black hole on the one hand and the dilatonic black hole on the other are

741: reflected in the overall behaviour of our approximate stress-energy tensors.

742: First, from (\ref{dilconf1}-\ref{dilconf3}) it could be easily inferred that 

743: $\langle T_{a}^{b}\rangle $ evaluated for the extremal configuration is

744: divergent as $y\rightarrow 1$. Indeed, for $q=\sqrt{2}$ the components of

745: the stress-energy tensor behave as $\left( y-1\right) ^{-3}.$ This is in a

746: sharp contrast with the Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m case, in which the

747: stress-energy tensor approaches 

748: \begin{equation}

749: \langle T_{a}^{b}\rangle =%

750: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{1}{2880\pi ^{2}m^{2}M^{6}}}%

751: %BeginExpansion

752: {\displaystyle{1 \over 2880\pi ^{2}m^{2}M^{6}}}%

753: %EndExpansion

754: \left[ 

755: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{16}{21}}%

756: %BeginExpansion

757: {\displaystyle{16 \over 21}}%

758: %EndExpansion

759: -\left( \xi -%

760: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{1}{6}}%

761: %BeginExpansion

762: {\displaystyle{1 \over 6}}%

763: %EndExpansion

764: \right) \right] {\rm diag}\left[ 1,1,-1,-1\right]

765: \end{equation}

766: as $y\rightarrow 1$. It should be noted however, that, except $a=0,$ the

767: region in the vicinity of the degenerate horizon of the extremal geometry is

768: beyond the applicability of the Schwinger-DeWitt approximation. On the other

769: hand, however, one expects that in the opposite limit, i.e. for $q\ll 1$,

770: the appropriate components of the stress-energy tensor are almost

771: indistinguishable.

772: 

773: To analyse $\langle T_{a}^{b}\rangle $ for intermediate values of $q$ let us

774: refer to the numerical calculations. The plots of the time radial and

775: angular components of the stress-energy tensor of the quantized massive

776: scalar field as a function of the rescaled radial coordinate for five

777: exemplar values of $q=\,$0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 0.65 and 0.85 are displayed in

778: figures 1--3. Inspection of the figures and comparison with the analogous

779: results obtained for the Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m geometry indicates that even

780: for the intermediate values of $q$ there are still qualitative similarities.

781: Indeed, the time and angular components attain (positive) maximum at the

782: event horizon, decrease with r and approach (negative) minimum. The

783: magnitude of the maximum and the modulus of the minimum increase with

784: increasing $q,$ and, consequently, so does the slope of the curves. 

785: 

786: Before proceeding to physically interesting and important case $\eta =-1/6$,

787: it is useful to study a role played by each $T_{a}^{\left( i\right) b}$

788: separately. First, $\,$it could be easily shown that $T_{a}^{\left( 3\right)

789: b}$ is negligible with respect to other terms, and, therefore, it does not

790: contribute to the final result for reasonable values of the curvature

791: coupling. The run of the resulting stress-energy tensor depends on a

792: competition between remaining components. Indeed, inspection of figure 4 

793: in which we exhibited $T_{t}^{\left( i\right) t}$ as a function of the

794: rescaled radial coordinate for four exemplar values of $q$ indicates that

795: the term $-T_{a}^{\left( 1\right) b}$ produces the most prominent maximum at

796: the event horizon for $q\lesssim 0.9$ whereas for greater values of $q$ this

797: role is played by $T_{a}^{\left( 2\right) b}.$ General features of $%

798: T_{r}^{\left( i\right) r}$ and $T_{\theta }^{\left( i\right) \theta }$ are

799: essentially the same.

800: 

801: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

802: %%%%%%%%%%%% ********** rysunek1  **********************

803: %%%% ******************** figure 1 ****************************************

804: \begin{figure}[tbh]

805: \centering

806: \includegraphics[width=12.5cm]{Fintt.eps}

807: \caption[ttt]{This graph shows the radial dependence of the rescaled

808: component $\protect\lambda \langle T_{t}^{t}\rangle ,$ $(\protect\lambda

809: =10^{3}/p)$ of the stress-energy tensor of the massive conformally coupled

810: scalar field in the geometry of the dilatonic black hole with $a=1.$ From

811: top to bottom at the event horizon the curves are for $|Q|/M$ = 0.1, 0.2,

812: 0.5, 0.65 and 0.85. In each case $\langle T_{t}^{t}\rangle $ has its

813: positive maximum at $r_{+}$ and attains negative minimum (right panel) away

814: from the event horizon. }

815: \label{fig1}

816: \end{figure}

817: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

818: %%%%%%%%%%%%% ********* rysunek2 ***************

819: %%% ********************* figure 2 *****************************************

820: \begin{figure}[tbh]

821: \centering

822: \includegraphics[width=12.5cm]{Finrad.eps}

823: \caption[rrrr]{This graph shows the radial dependence of the rescaled

824: component $\protect\lambda \langle T_{r}^{r}\rangle ,$ $(\protect\lambda

825: =10^{3}/p)$of the stress-energy tensor of the massive conformally coupled

826: scalar field in the geometry of the dilatonic black hole with $a=1.$ From

827: top to bottom at the event horizon the curves are for $|Q|/M$ = 0.1, 0.2,

828: 0.5, 0.65 and 0.85. In each case $\langle T_{tr}^{r}\rangle $ has its

829: positive maximum at $r_{+}$ and monotonically decreases with r.}

830: \label{fig2}

831: \end{figure}

832: 

833: Now the run of the stress-energy tensor as a function of $q$ could be easily

834: anticipated. The general structure remains, of course, of the form (\ref{w1}%

835: ), but now the dominant contribution to the result is provided initially by

836: the term $\eta T_{a}^{\left( 1\right) b}$ and subsequently with increasing $%

837: q $ by the sum $-1/6\,T_{a}^{\left( 1\right) b}+1/36\,T_{a}^{\left( 2\right)

838: b}.$ Moreover, since oscillatory-like behavior of $T_{a}^{\left( 3\right) b}$

839: does not play a significant role we have also qualitative similarities with

840: the tensor evaluated for the conformal coupling.

841: 

842: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

843: %%%%%%%%%%%%% ********* rysunek3 ***************

844: %%% ********************* figure 3 *****************************************

845: \begin{figure}[tbh]

846: \centering

847: \includegraphics[width=12.5cm]{Finang.eps}

848: \caption[aaa]{This graph shows the radial dependence of the rescaled

849: component $\protect\lambda \langle T_{\protect\theta }^{\protect\theta

850: }\rangle ,$ $(\protect\lambda =10^{3}/p)$ of the stress-energy tensor of the

851: massive conformally coupled scalar field in the geometry of the dilatonic

852: black hole with $a=1.$ From top to bottom at the event horizon the curves

853: are for $|Q|/M$ = 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 0.65 and 0.85. In each case $\langle

854: T_{t}^{t}\rangle $ has its positive maximum at ${+}$ and and attains

855: negative minimum (right panel) away from the event horizon.}

856: \label{fig3}

857: \end{figure}

858: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

859: 

860: Having computed $\tilde{T}_{a}^{\left( i\right) b}$ and combining them with

861: appropriate values of the coefficients $\alpha _{i}$ for $i=1..10,$ after

862: simplifications and rearrangement one has 

863: \begin{eqnarray}

864: \langle T_{t}^{t}\rangle &=&%

865: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{p}{\left( 2y-q^{2}\right) ^{6}}}%

866: %BeginExpansion

867: {\displaystyle{p \over \left( 2y-q^{2}\right) ^{6}}}%

868: %EndExpansion

869: \left[ \frac{1237}{210\,y^{3}}-\frac{75}{14\,y^{2}}-q^{2}\,\left( \frac{377}{%

870: 30\,y^{4}}-\frac{703}{70\,y^{3}}-\frac{9}{7\,y^{2}}\right) +q^{4}\,\left( 

871: \frac{3637}{140\,y^{5}}-\frac{5219}{140\,y^{4}}+\frac{2259}{140\,y^{3}}-%

872: \frac{99}{28\,y^{2}}\right) \right.  \nonumber \\

873: &&-q^{6}\,\left( \frac{84407}{3360\,y^{6}}-\frac{11311}{280\,y^{5}}+\frac{%

874: 1177}{60\,y^{4}}-\frac{99}{28\,y^{3}}\right) +q^{8}\,\left( \frac{218839}{%

875: 17920\,y^{7}}-\frac{1097669}{53760\,y^{6}}+\frac{11479}{1120\,y^{5}}-\frac{%

876: 3891}{2240\,y^{4}}\right)  \nonumber \\

877: &&\left. -q^{10}\,\left( \frac{318457}{107520\,y^{8}}-\frac{33919}{%

878: 6720\,y^{7}}+\frac{2639}{1024\,y^{6}}-\frac{273}{640\,y^{5}}\right)

879: +q^{12}\,\left( \frac{24685}{86016\,y^{9}}-\frac{42557}{86016\,y^{8}}+\frac{%

880: 3139}{12288\,y^{7}}-\frac{515}{12288\,y^{6}}\right) \right]  \nonumber \\

881: &&

882: \end{eqnarray}

883: 

884: %%Trr

885: \begin{eqnarray}

886: \langle T_{r}^{r}\rangle &=&%

887: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{p}{\left( 2y-q^{2}\right) ^{6}}}%

888: %BeginExpansion

889: {\displaystyle{p \over \left( 2y-q^{2}\right) ^{6}}}%

890: %EndExpansion

891: \left[ \frac{21}{10\,y^{2}}-\frac{47}{30\,y^{3}}+q^{2}\,\left( \frac{767}{%

892: 210\,y^{4}}-\frac{1081}{210\,y^{3}}+\frac{9}{35\,y^{2}}\right)

893: -q^{4}\,\left( \frac{2951}{420\,y^{5}}-\frac{5851}{420\,y^{4}}+\frac{85}{%

894: 12\,y^{3}}-\frac{207}{140\,y^{2}}\right) \right.  \nonumber \\

895: &&+q^{6}\,\left( \frac{20267}{3360\,y^{6}}-\frac{1469}{112\,y^{5}}+\frac{543%

896: }{70\,y^{4}}-\frac{207}{140\,y^{3}}\right) -q^{8}\,\left( \frac{26933}{%

897: 10752\,y^{7}}-\frac{101963}{17920\,y^{6}}+\frac{23609}{6720\,y^{5}}-\frac{203%

898: }{320\,y^{4}}\right)  \nonumber \\

899: &&\left. +q^{10}\,\left( \frac{53287}{107520\,y^{8}}-\frac{31429}{%

900: 26880\,y^{7}}+\frac{26559}{35840\,y^{6}}-\frac{593}{4480\,y^{5}}\right)

901: -q^{12}\,\left( \frac{5219}{143360\,y^{9}}-\frac{5531}{61440\,y^{8}}+\frac{%

902: 715}{12288\,y^{7}}-\frac{127}{12288\,y^{6}}\right) \right]  \nonumber \\

903: &&

904: \end{eqnarray}

905: 

906: and 

907: \begin{eqnarray}

908: &\langle T_{\theta }^{\theta }\rangle =&%

909: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{p}{\left( 2y-q^{2}\right) ^{6}}}%

910: %BeginExpansion

911: {\displaystyle{p \over \left( 2y-q^{2}\right) ^{6}}}%

912: %EndExpansion

913: \left[ \frac{1543}{210\,y^{3}}-\frac{63}{10\,y^{2}}-q^{2}\,\left( \frac{649}{%

914: 35\,y^{4}}-\frac{3509}{210\,y^{3}}+\frac{27}{35\,y^{2}}\right)

915: +q^{4}\,\left( \frac{40}{y^{5}}-\frac{2049}{35\,y^{4}}+\frac{311}{12\,y^{3}}-%

916: \frac{621}{140\,y^{2}}\right) \right.  \nonumber \\

917: &&-q^{6}\,\left( \frac{262747}{6720\,y^{6}}-\frac{210673}{3360\,y^{5}}+\frac{%

918: 1049}{35\,y^{4}}-\frac{621}{140\,y^{3}}\right) +q^{8}\,\left( \frac{342549}{%

919: 17920\,y^{7}}-\frac{1695223}{53760\,y^{6}}+\frac{68787}{4480\,y^{5}}-\frac{%

920: 607}{280\,y^{4}}\right)  \nonumber \\

921: &&\left. -q^{10}\,\left( \frac{33375}{7168\,y^{8}}-\frac{69651}{8960\,y^{7}}+%

922: \frac{410303}{107520\,y^{6}}-\frac{593}{1120\,y^{5}}\right) +q^{12}\,\left( 

923: \frac{194797}{430080\,y^{9}}-\frac{46747}{61440\,y^{8}}+\frac{1537}{%

924: 4096\,y^{7}}-\frac{635}{12288\,y^{6}}\right) \right]  \nonumber \\

925: &&

926: \end{eqnarray}

927: 

928: The qualitative behaviour of the stress-energy tensor of the minimally

929: coupled scalar field is similar to the conformally coupled case, and, once again, 

930: for the intermediate values of $q$

931: one has quantitative similarities with the Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m case. 

932: Moreover, from figure 4 one can easily deduce the general 

933: behaviour of the stress-energy tensor for arbitrary coupling for $q < 0.9 .$

934: 

935: %%%%%%%%%%%% ********* rysunek4 ***************

936: %%% ********************* figure 4 *****************************************

937: \begin{figure}[tbh]

938: \centering

939: \includegraphics[width=12.5cm]{Zbiorczy.eps}

940: \caption[aaa]{This graph shows radial dependence of the rescaled $%

941: T_{t}^{(0)t}$ (panel A), $T_{t}^{(1)t}$ (panel B), $T_{t}^{(2)t}$ (panel C)

942: and $T_{t}^{(3)t}$ (panel D) for $q\,=\,0.1,\,0.5,\,0.7\,{\rm and}\,0.9.$

943: The scaling factor is $960\protect\pi ^{2}m^{2}M^{6}.$ The magnitude of $%

944: T_{t}^{(i)t}$ grows with increasing $q$ for $i\,=\,0,\,2,$ and $3.$ }

945: \label{fig4}

946: \end{figure}

947: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

948: 

949: 

950: Finally we remark, that the dilatonic black holes with $a=1$ or $a=0$ do not

951: exhaust physically important solutions. For example for $a=\sqrt{3}$ one has

952: a four dimensional effective model reduced from the Kaluza-Klein theory in

953: five dimensions. By (\ref{schema}) and the approximate stress-energy tensor

954: expressed in term of $x$, $x_{+}$ and $x_{-}$ could be schematically written

955: as 

956: \begin{equation}

957: \langle T_{a}^{b}\rangle =%

958: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{p}{\left[ x\left( x-x_{-}\right) \right] ^{15/2}}}%

959: %BeginExpansion

960: {\displaystyle{p \over \left[ x\left( x-x_{-}\right) \right] ^{15/2}}}%

961: %EndExpansion

962: \sum_{ijk}d_{ijkb}^{a}\left[ \eta \right] \,x^{i}x_{+}^{j}x_{-}^{k}

963: \end{equation}

964: where $0\leq i\leq 7$, $0\leq j\leq 3$ and $0\leq k\leq 6$ subjected to the

965: condition $i+j+k=9.$ The qualitative behaviour of the stress-energy tensor

966: for both $\eta =0$ and $\eta =-1/6$ is similar to $\langle T_{a}^{b}\rangle $

967: constructed in the geometry of a dilatonic black hole with $a=1$ and its run

968: for small $q$ could be easily inferred form (\ref{ser1}). 

969: 

970: \section{Concluding remarks}

971: 

972: In this paper we have constructed and examined the approximate renormalized

973: stress-energy tensor of the massive scalar field in the spacetime of the

974: static electrically charged dilatonic black hole with the special emphasis

975: put on the string inspired case $a\,=\,1.$ The method employed here is based

976: on the observation that the lowest order of the expansion of the effective

977: action in $m^{-2\text{ }}$ could be expressed in terms of the integrated

978: coincidence limit of coefficient $a_{3}\left( x,x^{\prime }\right) .$

979: Although the line element of the dilatonic black hole has a simple form, the

980: analytical formulas describing the stress-energy tensor for a general $a$

981: constructed within the Schwinger-DeWitt framework are extremely complicated

982: and hence hard to utilize. Fortunately, for a concrete choice of $a$ there

983: are considerable simplification.

984: 

985: Expanding for $q\ll 1$ the stress-energy tensor into a power series it is

986: possible to analyse the influence of $a$ on $\langle T_{a}^{b}\rangle .$ For 

987: $q=0$ it reduces to the result derived by Frolov and Zel'nikov whereas for

988: small values of $\tilde{q}$ the stress-energy tensor resembles that

989: evaluated in the Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m geometry. The discrepancies between

990: the tensors grow with $\tilde{q}.$ It should be stressed however that in the

991: opposite limit the Schwinger-DeWitt technique is inapplicable.

992: 

993: The problem of the massless fields certainly deserves separate treatment,

994: this however would require extensive numerical calculations as even for

995: simplest case of the Schwarzschild geometry existing analytical

996: approximations give, at best, only qualitative agreement with the exact

997: results. At the moment we only know that the horizon value of the field

998: fluctuation \cite{kyioshi} 

999: \begin{equation}

1000: \langle \phi ^{2}\rangle =%

1001: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{1}{48\pi ^{2}M^{2}x_{+}^{2}}}%

1002: %BeginExpansion

1003: {\displaystyle{1 \over 48\pi ^{2}M^{2}x_{+}^{2}}}%

1004: %EndExpansion

1005: \left[ 1-%

1006: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{x_{-}}{\left( 1+a^{2}\right) \,x_{+}}}%

1007: %BeginExpansion

1008: {\displaystyle{x_{-} \over \left( 1+a^{2}\right) \,x_{+}}}%

1009: %EndExpansion

1010: \right] \left( 1-%

1011: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{x_{-}}{x_{+}}}%

1012: %BeginExpansion

1013: {\displaystyle{x_{-} \over x_{+}}}%

1014: %EndExpansion

1015: \right) ^{-%

1016: %TCIMACRO{\tfrac{2a^{2}}{1+a^{2}}}%

1017: %BeginExpansion

1018: {\textstyle{2a^{2} \over 1+a^{2}}}%

1019: %EndExpansion

1020: },

1021: \end{equation}

1022: which is divergent in the extremality limit for $a>0.$ This suggests that

1023: the stress-energy tensor is also divergent at $r_{+}$ of the extremal case.

1024: On the other hand, a first nonvanishing term of the approximation to the

1025: field fluctuation for a massive field is simply 

1026: \begin{equation}

1027: \langle \phi ^{2}\rangle =%

1028: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{1}{16\pi ^{2}m^{2}}}%

1029: %BeginExpansion

1030: {\displaystyle{1 \over 16\pi ^{2}m^{2}}}%

1031: %EndExpansion

1032: \left[ a_{2}\right] +{\cal O}\left( m^{-4}\right) ,

1033: \end{equation}

1034: and it could be easily shown that 

1035: \begin{equation}

1036: \langle \phi ^{2}\rangle =%

1037: %TCIMACRO{

1038: %\dfrac{f\left( a,r_{+},r_{-}\right) }{720\pi ^{2}m^{2}M^{4}x_{+}^{6}}}%

1039: %BeginExpansion

1040: {\displaystyle{f\left( a,r_{+},r_{-}\right)  \over 720\pi ^{2}m^{2}M^{4}x_{+}^{6}}}%

1041: %EndExpansion

1042: \left( 1+a^{2}\right) ^{-2}\left( 1-%

1043: %TCIMACRO{\dfrac{x_{-}}{x_{+}}}%

1044: %BeginExpansion

1045: {\displaystyle{x_{-} \over x_{+}}}%

1046: %EndExpansion

1047: \right) ^{-%

1048: %TCIMACRO{\tfrac{4a^{2}}{1+a^{2}}}%

1049: %BeginExpansion

1050: {\textstyle{4a^{2} \over 1+a^{2}}}%

1051: %EndExpansion

1052: }+{\cal O}\left( m^{-4}\right) ,

1053: \end{equation}

1054: where 

1055: \begin{equation}

1056: f\left( a,r_{+},r_{-}\right) =\left[ 4+3a^{2}\left( 1-5\xi \right) \right]

1057: x_{-}^{2}-6\left( 1+a^{2}\right) x_{+}x_{-}+3\left( 1+a^{2}\right)

1058: ^{2}x_{+}^{2}.

1059: \end{equation}

1060: 

1061: Finally, we make some comments regarding applications and generalizations of

1062: the results presented in this paper. The question of the massless field has

1063: been addressed above. A careful analysis carried out for $a=0$ in ref.~\cite

1064: {tomimatsu} shows that at least up to ${\cal O}\left( m^{-4}\right) $ the

1065: adapted method approximates well the field fluctuation of the massive field

1066: in the thermal state of temperature $T_{H}.$ It would be interesting to

1067: extend this analysis for any value of $a.$ We also remark that the derived

1068: stress-energy tensors may be employed as a source term of the semiclassical

1069: Einstein field equations. Indeed, preliminary calculations indicate that it

1070: is possible to construct the solution to the linearized semiclassical

1071: Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton equations. We hope that because of their simplicity

1072: presented results will be of use in subsequent applications. We intend to

1073: return to this group of problems elsewhere.

1074: 

1075: %%%%%%%%%%%%%

1076: %%%%%%%%%%%%%

1077: 

1078: \centerline{\bf{APPENDIX}}

1079: 

1080: \subsection{Coincidence limits of the coefficients $a_{2}\left( x,x^{\prime

1081: }\right) ${\protect\small \ }and $a_{3}\left( x,x^{\prime }\right) $}

1082: 

1083: In this appendix we list coincidence limits of the coefficients $a_{2}\left(

1084: x,x^{\prime }\right) $ and $a_{3}\left( x,x^{\prime }\right) $ for the

1085: scalar field equation (\ref{wave}). With the normalization employed in this

1086: paper the coefficient $[a_{2}]$ reads

1087: 

1088: \begin{equation}

1089: \lbrack a_{2}]\,=\,-{\frac{1}{6}}\left( \xi -{\frac{1}{5}}\right) \Box R\,+\,%

1090: {\frac{1}{2}}\left( \xi -{\frac{1}{6}}\right) ^{2}R^{2}\,+\,{\frac{1}{180}}%

1091: \left( R_{abcd}R^{abcd}-R_{ab}R^{ab}\right) ,

1092: \end{equation}

1093: whereas $[a_{3}]$ could be written sa 

1094: \begin{equation}

1095: \lbrack a_{3}]\,=\,{\frac{b_{3}}{7!}}\,+\,{\frac{c_{3}}{360}},

1096: \end{equation}

1097: where 

1098: \begin{eqnarray}

1099: b_{3}\, &=&\,{\frac{35}{9}}R^{3}\,+\,17R_{;p}R^{;p}\,-\,R_{qa;p}R^{qa;q}\,-%

1100: \,4R_{qa;p}R^{pa;q}  \nonumber \\

1101: &+&9R_{qabc;p}R^{qabc;p}\,+\,2R\Box R\,+\,18\Box ^{2}R\,-\,8R_{pq}\Box

1102: R^{pq}-{\frac{14}{3}}RR_{pq}R^{pq}  \nonumber \\

1103: &+&24R_{pq;a}^{\ \ \ q}R^{pa}\,-\,{\frac{208}{9}}R_{pq}R^{qa}R_{a}^{\

1104: p}\,+\,12\Box R_{pqab}R^{pqab}+{\frac{64}{3}}R_{pq}R_{ab}R^{paqb}  \nonumber

1105: \\

1106: &-&{\frac{16}{3}}R_{pq}R_{~abc}^{p}R^{qabc}\,+\,{\frac{80}{9}}%

1107: R_{pqab}R_{c~d}^{~p~a}R^{qcbd}\,+\,{\frac{44}{9}}%

1108: R_{pqab}R_{cd}^{~~pq}R^{abcd}

1109: \end{eqnarray}

1110: and 

1111: \begin{eqnarray}

1112: c_{3}\, &=&\,-(5\xi -30\xi ^{2}+60\xi ^{3})R^{3}\,-\,(12\xi -30\xi

1113: ^{2})R_{;p}R^{;p}\,-\,(22\xi -60\xi ^{2})R\Box R  \nonumber \\

1114: &-&\,6\xi \Box ^{2}R\,-\,4\xi R_{pq}R^{pq}\,+\,2\xi RR_{pq}R^{pq}\,-\,2\xi

1115: RR_{pqab}R^{pqab}.

1116: \end{eqnarray}

1117: 

1118: \subsection{$\langle T_{a}^{b}\rangle $ of the massive scalar fields in the

1119: spacetime of the Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m black hole}

1120: 

1121: Inserting curvature tensor and its covariant derivatives into the general

1122: formulas obtained form functional differentiation of the effective action (%

1123: \ref{ww}) with respect to the metric tensor one obtains the approximate

1124: stress-energy tensor of massive fields. Since the curvature scalar of the

1125: Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m geometry is zero, one expects considerable

1126: simplifications. Indeed, it could be easily shown that the tensors ${\tilde{T%

1127: }}_{a}^{(1)b}$ and ${\tilde{T}}_{a}^{(3)b}$ do not contribute to the final

1128: result. The stress-energy tensor of the massive scalar field with arbitrary

1129: coupling with curvature in the Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m has the form (\ref

1130: {setrn}), where 

1131: \begin{equation}

1132: T_{t}^{(0)t}\,=\,\frac{313\,x^{3}}{7}-\frac{285\,x^{4}}{14}+q^{2}\,\left( 

1133: \frac{-769\,x^{2}}{14}-\frac{192\,x^{3}}{7}+\frac{135\,x^{4}}{7}\right)

1134: +q^{4}\,\left( \frac{514\,x}{7}-\frac{101\,x^{2}}{21}\right) -\frac{%

1135: 208\,q^{6}}{7},

1136: \end{equation}

1137: \begin{equation}

1138: T_{r}^{((0)r}\,=-11\,x^{3}+\frac{15\,x^{4}}{2}+q^{2}\,\left( \frac{709\,x^{2}%

1139: }{14}-\frac{248\,x^{3}}{7}+\frac{27\,x^{4}}{7}\right) +q^{4}\,\left( -46\,x+%

1140: \frac{421\,x^{2}}{21}\right) +\frac{74\,q^{6}}{7},

1141: \end{equation}

1142: \begin{equation}

1143: T_{\theta }^{(0)\theta }\,=\,\frac{367\,x^{3}}{7}-\frac{45\,x^{4}}{2}%

1144: +q^{2}\,\left( \frac{-3303\,x^{2}}{14}+\frac{814\,x^{3}}{7}-\frac{81\,x^{4}}{%

1145: 7}\right) +q^{4}\,\left( \frac{1726\,x}{7}-\frac{1522\,x^{2}}{21}\right)

1146: -73\,q^{6},

1147: \end{equation}

1148: \begin{equation}

1149: T_{t}^{(1)t}\,=\,-792\,x^{3}+360\,x^{4}+q^{2}\,\left(

1150: 2604\,x^{2}-1008\,x^{3}\right) +q^{4}\,\left( -2712\,x+728\,x^{2}\right)

1151: +819\,q^{6},

1152: \end{equation}

1153: \begin{equation}

1154: T_{r}^{(1)r}\,=\,216\,x^{3}-144\,x^{4}+q^{2}\,\left(

1155: -588\,x^{2}+336\,x^{3}\right) +q^{4}\,\left( 504\,x-208\,x^{2}\right)

1156: -117\,q^{6}

1157: \end{equation}

1158: and 

1159: \begin{equation}

1160: T_{\theta }^{(1)\theta }\,=-1008\,x^{3}+432\,x^{4}+q^{2}\,\left(

1161: 3276\,x^{2}-1176\,x^{3}\right) +q^{4}\,\left( -3408\,x+832\,x^{2}\right)

1162: +1053\,q^{6}.

1163: \end{equation}

1164: 

1165: \subsection{Power expansion of the stress-energy tensor for $q\ll 1$}

1166: 

1167: Repeating the calculations for the line element (\ref{el1}-\ref{el2}) one

1168: obtains components of the stress-energy tensor in the geometry of a general

1169: dilatonic black hole. Assuming $q\ll 1$ and expanding the result into a

1170: power series, after the necessary simplifications (\ref{ser1}), where the

1171: coefficients $t_{a}^{\left( i\right) b}$ are given by 

1172: \begin{equation}

1173: t_{t}^{\left( 1\right) t}=\frac{939}{35}-\frac{76\,x}{7}+\eta \,\left(

1174: 192\,x-\frac{2376}{5}\right) ,

1175: \end{equation}

1176: \begin{equation}

1177: t_{r}^{\left( 1\right) r}=4x-\frac{33}{5}+\eta \,\left( \frac{648}{5}-\frac{%

1178: 384\,x}{5}\right) ,

1179: \end{equation}

1180: \begin{equation}

1181: t_{\theta }^{\left( 1\right) \theta }=\frac{1101}{35}-12\,x-\eta \,\left( 

1182: \frac{3024}{5}-\frac{1152\,x}{5}\right) ,

1183: \end{equation}

1184: \begin{eqnarray}

1185: t_{t}^{\left( 2\right) t} &=&\frac{1207}{140}-\frac{4359\,a^{2}}{140}-\frac{%

1186: 9773}{210\,x}+\frac{939\,a^{2}}{14\,x}+\frac{181\,x}{105}+\frac{19\,a^{2}\,x%

1187: }{7}-\frac{x^{2}}{14}  \nonumber \\

1188: &&+\eta \,\left( \frac{2754\,a^{2}}{5}-\frac{1594}{15}+\frac{888}{x}-\frac{%

1189: 1188\,a^{2}}{x}-\frac{436\,x}{5}-48\,a^{2}\,x+12\,x^{2}\right)  \nonumber \\

1190: &&+{\eta }^{2}\,\left( -6076+\frac{6000}{x}+1908\,x-180\,x^{2}\right) , 

1191: \nonumber \\

1192: &&

1193: \end{eqnarray}

1194: \begin{eqnarray}

1195: t_{r}^{\left( 2\right) r} &=&-\frac{12091}{1260}+\frac{213\,a^{2}}{20}+\frac{%

1196: 3793}{210\,x}-\frac{33\,a^{2}}{2\,x}+\frac{83\,x}{315}-a^{2}\,x+\frac{%

1197: 11\,x^{2}}{70}  \nonumber \\

1198: &&+\eta \,\left( 58-\frac{1026\,a^{2}}{5}-\frac{1032}{5\,x}+\frac{324\,a^{2}%

1199: }{x}+\frac{388\,x}{15}+\frac{96\,a^{2}\,x}{5}-\frac{24\,x^{2}}{5}\right) 

1200: \nonumber \\

1201: &&+{\eta }^{2}\,\left( 1556-\frac{1200}{x}-612\,x+72\,x^{2}\right)  \nonumber

1202: \\

1203: &&

1204: \end{eqnarray}

1205: \begin{eqnarray}

1206: t_{\theta }^{\left( 2\right) \theta } &=&\frac{6841}{252}-\frac{4881\,a^{2}}{%

1207: 140}-\frac{18139}{210\,x}+\frac{1101\,a^{2}}{14\,x}+\frac{227\,x}{315}%

1208: +3\,a^{2}\,x-\frac{33\,x^{2}}{70}  \nonumber \\

1209: &&+\eta \,\left( \frac{3348\,a^{2}}{5}+\frac{5572}{5\,x}-\frac{1512\,a^{2}}{x%

1210: }-\frac{1628\,x}{15}-\frac{288\,a^{2}\,x}{5}+\frac{72\,x^{2}}{5}-\frac{296}{3%

1211: }\right)  \nonumber \\

1212: &&+{\eta }^{2}\,\left( -7232+\frac{7200}{x}+2268\,x-216\,x^{2}\right) , 

1213: \nonumber \\

1214: &&

1215: \end{eqnarray}

1216: \begin{eqnarray}

1217: t_{t}^{\left( 3\right) t} &=&\frac{4847}{840}-\frac{4138\,a^{2}}{315}+\frac{%

1218: 4359\,a^{4}}{280}+\frac{20149}{420\,x^{2}}-\frac{24971\,a^{2}}{210\,x^{2}}+%

1219: \frac{3443\,a^{4}}{28\,x^{2}}-\frac{9059}{420\,x}+\frac{6026\,a^{2}}{105\,x}-%

1220: \frac{297\,a^{4}}{4\,x}-\frac{79\,x}{210}  \nonumber \\

1221: &&+\frac{152\,a^{2}\,x}{105}-\frac{19\,a^{4}\,x}{14}-\frac{x^{2}}{28}+\frac{%

1222: a^{2}\,x^{2}}{28}+\eta \left( \frac{5642\,a^{2}}{5\,x^{2}}-\frac{1294}{15}-%

1223: \frac{662\,a^{2}}{5}-\frac{1377\,a^{4}}{5}-\frac{4346}{5\,x^{2}}-\frac{%

1224: 2178\,a^{4}}{x^{2}}\right.  \nonumber \\

1225: &&\left. +\frac{1936}{5\,x}-\frac{278\,a^{2}}{15\,x}+\frac{1314\,a^{4}}{x}-%

1226: \frac{78\,x}{5}+\frac{198\,a^{2}\,x}{5}+24\,a^{4}\,x+6\,x^{2}-6\,a^{2}%

1227: \,x^{2}\right)  \nonumber \\

1228: &&+\eta ^{2}\left( 7634\,a^{2}-658-\frac{2232}{x^{2}}+\frac{21984\,a^{2}}{%

1229: x^{2}}+\frac{696}{x}-\frac{21596\,a^{2}}{x}+534\,x-1254\,a^{2}\,x-90%

1230: \,x^{2}+90\,a^{2}\,x^{2}\right)  \nonumber \\

1231: &&

1232: \end{eqnarray}

1233: \begin{eqnarray}

1234: t_{r}^{\left( 3\right) r} &=&-\frac{1783}{840}+\frac{187\,a^{2}}{70}-\frac{%

1235: 213\,a^{4}}{40}-\frac{5009}{420\,x^{2}}+\frac{5111\,a^{2}}{210\,x^{2}}-\frac{%

1236: 121\,a^{4}}{4\,x^{2}}+\frac{401}{60\,x}-\frac{4352\,a^{2}}{315\,x}+\frac{%

1237: 93\,a^{4}}{4\,x}  \nonumber \\

1238: &&+\frac{109\,x}{630}-\frac{2\,a^{2}\,x}{45}+\frac{a^{4}\,x}{2}+\frac{%

1239: 11\,x^{2}}{140}-\frac{11\,a^{2}\,x^{2}}{140}+\eta \left( \frac{86}{3}+\frac{%

1240: 188\,a^{2}}{5}+\frac{513\,a^{4}}{5}+\frac{158}{x^{2}}-\frac{250\,a^{2}}{x^{2}%

1241: }\right.  \nonumber \\

1242: &&\left. +\frac{594\,a^{4}}{x^{2}}-\frac{96}{x}+\frac{118\,a^{2}}{5\,x}-%

1243: \frac{450\,a^{4}}{x}+\frac{18\,x}{5}-\frac{66\,a^{2}\,x}{5}-\frac{%

1244: 48\,a^{4}\,x}{5}-\frac{12\,x^{2}}{5}+\frac{12\,a^{2}\,x^{2}}{5}\right) 

1245: \nonumber \\

1246: &&+{\eta }^{2}\,\left( 130-2442\,a^{2}+\frac{288}{x^{2}}-\frac{4656\,a^{2}}{%

1247: x^{2}}-\frac{60}{x}+\frac{5764\,a^{2}}{x}-166\,x+454\,a^{2}\,x+36\,x^{2}-36%

1248: \,a^{2}\,x^{2}\right) .  \nonumber \\

1249: &&

1250: \end{eqnarray}

1251: and 

1252: \begin{eqnarray}

1253: t_{\theta }^{\left( 3\right) \theta } &=&\frac{2411}{360}-\frac{7267\,a^{2}}{%

1254: 1260}+\frac{4881\,a^{4}}{280}+\frac{29963}{420\,x^{2}}-\frac{8857\,a^{2}}{%

1255: 70\,x^{2}}+\frac{4037\,a^{4}}{28\,x^{2}}-\frac{11617}{420\,x}+\frac{%

1256: 2792\,a^{2}}{63\,x}-\frac{2361\,a^{4}}{28\,x}  \nonumber \\

1257: &&-\frac{13\,x}{315}-\frac{31\,a^{2}\,x}{90}-\frac{3\,a^{4}\,x}{2}-\frac{%

1258: 33\,x^{2}}{140}+\frac{33\,a^{2}\,x^{2}}{140}+\eta \left( \frac{1378\,a^{2}}{%

1259: x^{2}}-\frac{1252}{15}-\frac{926\,a^{2}}{5}-\frac{1674\,a^{4}}{5}-\frac{5214%

1260: }{5\,x^{2}}\right.  \nonumber \\

1261: &&\left. -\frac{2772\,a^{4}}{x^{2}}+\frac{2052}{5\,x}+\frac{976\,a^{2}}{15\,x%

1262: }+\frac{1620\,a^{4}}{x}-\frac{108\,x}{5}+\frac{252\,a^{2}\,x}{5}+\frac{%

1263: 144\,a^{4}\,x}{5}+\frac{36\,x^{2}}{5}-\frac{36\,a^{2}\,x^{2}}{5}\right) 

1264: \nonumber \\

1265: &&+{\eta }^{2}\,\left( 9182\,a^{2}-870-\frac{2970}{x^{2}}+\frac{26640\,a^{2}%

1266: }{x^{2}}+\frac{1098}{x}-\frac{26008\,a^{2}}{x}+644\,x-1508\,a^{2}\,x-108%

1267: \,x^{2}+108\,a^{2}\,x^{2}\right)  \nonumber \\

1268: &&

1269: \end{eqnarray}

1270: The terms containing $\eta ^{3}$ appear starting form $q^{8}$

1271: 

1272: \begin{references}

1273: \bibitem{pcwd}  Birrell N B and Davies P C W 1982 {\it Quantum fields in

1274: curved space } (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)

1275: 

1276: \bibitem{Julian}  Schwinger J S 1951 Phys. Rev. {\bf 82} 664

1277: 

1278: \bibitem{Bryce1}  DeWitt B S 1965 {\it Dynamical Theory of groups fields}

1279: (New York: Gordon Breach)

1280: 

1281: \bibitem{Bryce2}  B. S. DeWitt 1975 Phys. Rep. {\bf 19C} 297

1282: 

1283: \bibitem{fz1}  Frolov V P and Zel'nikov A I 1982 Phys. Lett. {\bf B115} 372

1284: 

1285: \bibitem{fz2}  Frolov V P and Zel'nikov A I 1983 Phys. Lett. {\bf B123} 197

1286: 

1287: \bibitem{fz3}  Frolov V P and Zel'nikov A I 1984 Phys. Rev. D{\bf 29} 1057

1288: 

1289: \bibitem{Gibbons1}  Gibbons G W 1979 {\it General Relativity: An Einstein

1290: Centenary Survey }ed S W Hawking and W Israel (Cambridge: Cambridge

1291: University Press)

1292: 

1293: \bibitem{sakai}  Sakai T 1971 Tohoku Math. J. {\bf 23} 589

1294: 

1295: \bibitem{gil1}  Gilkey P B 1975 Differential Geometry {\bf 10} 601

1296: 

1297: \bibitem{gil2}  Gilkey P B 1977 Trans. Am. Math. Soc. {\bf 225} 341

1298: 

1299: \bibitem{AvraPhD}  Avramidi I G 1986 Ph. D. Thesis

1300: 

1301: \bibitem{Avraros}  Avramidi I G 1989 Theor. Math. Phys. {\bf 79} 494

1302: 

1303: \bibitem{Avranucl}  Avramidi I G 1991 Nucl. Phys. {\bf B355} 712

1304: 

1305: \bibitem{Amsterdamski}  Amsterdamski P, Berkin A L and O'Connor D J 1989

1306: Class. Quantum Grav. 6 1981

1307: 

1308: \bibitem{kocio1}  Matyjasek J 2000 Phys. Rev. D {\bf 61} 124019

1309: 

1310: \bibitem{kocio2}  Matyjasek J 2001 Phys. Rev. D {\bf 63} 084004

1311: 

1312: \bibitem{AHS}  Anderson P R, Hiscock W A and Samuel D A 1995 Phys. Rev. D 

1313: {\bf 51} 4337

1314: 

1315: \bibitem{paul2}  Taylor B E, Hiscock W A and Anderson P R 2000 Phys. Rev. D 

1316: {\bf 61} 084021

1317: 

1318: \bibitem{wormhole}  Hiscock W A, Larson S L and Anderson P R 1997 Phys. Rev.

1319: D {\bf 56} 3571

1320: 

1321: \bibitem{inside}  Taylor B E, Hiscock W A and Anderson P R 1997 Phys. Rev. D 

1322: {\bf 55} 6116

1323: 

1324: \bibitem{kocio3}  Matyjasek J and Zaslavskii O B 2001 Phys. Rev. D{\bf 64}

1325: 104018

1326: 

1327: \bibitem{kocio4}  Berej W and Matyjasek J 2002 Phys. Rev. D {\bf 66} 024022

1328: 

1329: \bibitem{Kof1}  Kofman L A and Sahni V 1983 Phys. Lett. {\bf B127} 197.

1330: 

1331: \bibitem{Kof2}  Starobinsky A\ A, KofmanL A and Sahni V 1983 Zh. Eksp. Teor.

1332: Fiz. {\bf 85} 1876

1333: 

1334: \bibitem{paulhalf}  Groves P B, Anderson P R and Carlson E D 2002 Method to

1335: compute the stress-energy tensor for massless spin 1/2 field in a general

1336: static spherically symmetric spacetime (gr-qc/0207066)

1337: 

1338: \bibitem{Myers1}  Myers R C 1987 Nucl. Phys.{\bf \ B 289 }701

1339: 

1340: \bibitem{Myers2}  Callan C G, Myers R C and Perry M J 1989 Nucl. Phys {\bf B

1341: 311} 373

1342: 

1343: \bibitem{gibbons2}  Gibbons G W and Maeda K 1988 Nucl. Phys. {\bf B 298} 741

1344: 

1345: \bibitem{horowitz}  Garfinkle D, Horowitz G T and Strominger A 1991 Phys.

1346: Rev. D {\bf 43} 3140

1347: 

1348: \bibitem{koga1}  Koga J and Maeda K 1995 Phys. Rev. D {\bf 52 }7066

1349: 

1350: \bibitem{cqg}  Alexeyev S, Barrau A, Boudoul O, Khovanskaya O and Sazhin M

1351: 2002 Class. Quantum Grav. {\bf 19} 4431

1352: 

1353: \bibitem{kyioshi}  Shiraishi K 1992 Mod. Phys. Lett. A{\bf 7} 3569

1354: 

1355: \bibitem{FrolovNovikov}  Frolov V P and I.~D. Novikov I D 1999 {\em Physics

1356: of Black Holes} (Kluwer: New York)

1357: 

1358: \bibitem{frolovhab}  Frolov V P 1986 Proceedings of the Lebedev Institute of

1359: the Academy of Science \ of USSR {\bf 169}

1360: 

1361: \bibitem{tomimatsu}  Koyama H, Nambu Y and Tomimatsu A 2000 Mod. Phys. Lett. 

1362: {\bf 15 }815

1363: \end{references}

1364: 

1365: \end{document}

1366: