1: 

2: \documentclass{article}

3: \usepackage{amssymb}

4: 

5: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6: \usepackage{graphicx}

7: \usepackage{amsmath}

8: 

9: %TCIDATA{OutputFilter=LATEX.DLL}

10: %TCIDATA{Created=Fri Jan 24 14:34:09 2003}

11: %TCIDATA{LastRevised=Tue Feb 04 13:59:54 2003}

12: %TCIDATA{<META NAME="GraphicsSave" CONTENT="32">}

13: %TCIDATA{<META NAME="DocumentShell" CONTENT="General\Blank Document">}

14: %TCIDATA{CSTFile=LaTeX article.cst}

15: 

16: \newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}

17: \newtheorem{acknowledgement}[theorem]{Acknowledgement}

18: \newtheorem{algorithm}[theorem]{Algorithm}

19: \newtheorem{axiom}[theorem]{Axiom}

20: \newtheorem{case}[theorem]{Case}

21: \newtheorem{claim}[theorem]{Claim}

22: \newtheorem{conclusion}[theorem]{Conclusion}

23: \newtheorem{condition}[theorem]{Condition}

24: \newtheorem{conjecture}[theorem]{Conjecture}

25: \newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}

26: \newtheorem{criterion}[theorem]{Criterion}

27: \newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}

28: \newtheorem{example}[theorem]{Example}

29: \newtheorem{exercise}[theorem]{Exercise}

30: \newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}

31: \newtheorem{notation}[theorem]{Notation}

32: \newtheorem{problem}[theorem]{Problem}

33: \newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}

34: \newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}

35: \newtheorem{solution}[theorem]{Solution}

36: \newtheorem{summary}[theorem]{Summary}

37: \newenvironment{proof}[1][Proof]{\textbf{#1.} }{\ \rule{0.5em}{0.5em}}

38: \input{tcilatex}

39: 

40: \begin{document}

41: 

42: \title{A numerical analysis for G(t) in the Scalar-tensor theory.}

43: \author{Luis Augusto Trevisan \\

44: %EndAName

45: Demat-Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa.\\

46: Ponta Grossa-PR-Brazil- CEP 84030-000\\

47: latrevis@uepg.br}

48: \maketitle

49: 

50: \begin{abstract}

51: We studied the variation of Newton%

52: %TCIMACRO{\UNICODE{0xb4}}%

53: %BeginExpansion

54: \'{}%

55: %EndExpansion

56: s gravitational constant $G,$ using the experimental data and the

57: scalar-tensor theory for gravitation. We search for a fine tunning to match

58: the datas and find possible scenarios for the history of this constant.

59: \end{abstract}

60: 

61: \section{Introduction}

62: 

63: Since the thirties, many cosmologists have been suggested \ theories that \

64: predict the variation of Newton's gravitational ''constant''. \ Among the

65: more famous are Dirac's Large Number Hypothesis \cite{Dirac}, the

66: Brans-Dicke theory \cite{BD} and more recently, some model of scalar-tensor

67: theories (see the work by Barrow \cite{STT}. for a review). The last one can

68: be seen as a generalization of Brans-Dicke theory.

69: 

70: On the experimental hand, some measurements are performed to study this

71: variation; for instance, the spacecraft radar ranging \cite{srr} and lunar

72: laser ranging \cite{llr} . Both experiments give an upper limit for the

73: ratio $\left| \dot{G}/G\right| $ $\ $that is:

74: 

75: \begin{equation*}

76: \left| \frac{\dot{G}}{G}\right| <10^{-12}yr^{-1}

77: \end{equation*}

78: 

79: On despite of \ so especulative ideas, I have seen few numerical analisys

80: about the evolution of the value Newton's gravitational constant. \ A work

81: by Bronikov, Melnikov and Novello \cite{BMN} is in this sense. They describe

82: the upper limit to $\left| \dot{G}/G\right| .$ Barrow and Parsons \cite{BP}

83: studied the behavior of cosmological models with varying $G$ .They describe

84: some analytical solutions to the field equations, using the conformal time

85: coordinates and showed the dependence of the coupling constant $\omega $

86: with $\phi /\phi _{0}$ in some particular cases of the models.

87: 

88: In the present work, we made a numerical analisys, based in a Scalar-Tensor

89: theory, with variable $\omega ,$studied by Barrow and others \cite{STT}.

90: These numerical analisys, togheter with experimental data, could indicate

91: the more correct theory, the initial conditions of the Universe and the

92: evolution.The paper is divided in the following sequence: in next section,

93: we review the model and isolated some variables that will be important in

94: the sequence. In section 3, we show the numerical methods and hypotheses. In

95: section 4 we show some graphics, the main point of this work. The last

96: section is devoted to discussion and concluion.

97: 

98: \noindent

99: 

100: \section{Relativistic scalar-tensor theories}

101: 

102: Newtonian gravitation permits us to ' write in' an explicit time variation

103: of G without the need to satisfy any further constraint. However, in general

104: relativity the geometrical structure of space-time is determined by the

105: sources of mass-energy it contains and so there are further constraints to

106: be satisfied. Suppose that we take Einstein's equation in the form\ (c$%

107: \equiv 1$)

108: 

109: \begin{equation*}

110: \tilde{G}_{b}^{a}=8\pi GT_{b}^{a}

111: \end{equation*}

112: where $\tilde{G}_{b}^{a}$ and $T_{b}^{a}$ are the Einstein and

113: energy-momentum tensors, as usual, but imagine that $G=G(t).$ \ If we take a

114: covariant divergence $_{;a}$ of this equation the left-hand \ vanishes

115: because of the Bianchi identities, $T_{b;a}^{a}=0$ if energy-momentum

116: conservation is assumed to hold, hence $\partial G/\partial x^{a}=0$ always.

117: In order to introduce a time- variation \ of $G$ \ we need\ to derive \ the

118: space and time variations from some scalar \ field, $\psi $ which

119: contributes a stress tensor $\tilde{T}_{b}^{a}(\psi )$ to the right=hand

120: side of the gravitational field equations.

121: 

122: We can express this structure by a choice of lagrangian, linear in the

123: curvatura scalar $R$, that generaizes the Einstein-Hilbert lagrangian of

124: general relativity with,

125: 

126: \begin{equation}

127: L=-f(\psi )R+\frac{1}{2}\partial _{a}\psi \partial ^{a}\psi +16\pi L_{m}

128: \label{F1}

129: \end{equation}

130: where $L_{m}$ is the lagrangian of matter fields. The choice of function $%

131: f(\psi )$ defines the theory. When $\psi $ is constant this reduces, after

132: rescaling \ of coordinates, to the Einstein-Hilbert lagrangian of general

133: relativity. The formulation introduced by Brans-Dicke \cite{BD} can be

134: obtained from \ref{F1} by a non-linear tranformation of $\psi $ and $f.$

135: Define a new scalar field $\phi $ , and a new coupling constant $\omega

136: (\phi )$ by

137: 

138: \begin{equation}

139: \begin{array}{c}

140: \phi =f(\psi ) \\ 

141: \omega =f/(2f%

142: %TCIMACRO{\UNICODE[m]{0xb4}}%

143: %BeginExpansion

144: {\acute{}}%

145: %EndExpansion

146: %TCIMACRO{\UNICODE[m]{0xb4}}%

147: %BeginExpansion

148: {\acute{}}%

149: %EndExpansion

150: ^{2})

151: \end{array}

152: \label{f2}

153: \end{equation}

154: then \ref{F1} becames

155: 

156: \begin{equation}

157: L=-\phi R+\frac{\omega (\phi )}{\phi }\partial _{a}\phi \partial ^{a}\phi

158: +16\pi L_{m}.  \label{F3}

159: \end{equation}

160: The Brans-Dicke theory arises as the special case

161: 

162: \begin{equation}

163: Brans-Dicke:\quad \omega (\phi )=\text{constant};\text{ }f(\psi )\propto

164: \psi ^{2}.  \label{f4}

165: \end{equation}

166: 

167: The field equations that arise by varying the action associated with $L$ in 

168: \ref{F3} with respect to the metric, $g_{ab\text{ }}$and $\phi $ separately,

169: gives the field equations,

170: 

171: \begin{equation}

172: \tilde{G}_{ab}=-\frac{8\pi }{\phi }T_{ab}-\frac{\omega (\phi )}{\phi ^{2}}%

173: \left[ \phi _{,a}\phi _{,b}-\frac{1}{2}g_{ab}\phi _{,i}\phi _{,i}\right]

174: -\phi ^{-1}\left[ \phi _{,a;b}-g_{ab}\square \phi \right]  \label{f5}

175: \end{equation}

176: \begin{equation}

177: \left[ 3+2\omega (\phi )\right] \square \phi =8\pi T_{a}^{a}-\omega ^{\prime

178: }(\phi )\phi _{,i}\phi ^{^{\prime }i}  \label{f6}

179: \end{equation}

180: where \ the energy-momentum tensor of the matter sources obeys the

181: conservation equation

182: 

183: \begin{equation}

184: T_{;a}^{ab}=0.  \label{f7}

185: \end{equation}

186: These field equations reduce to those of general relativity when $\phi $

187: (and hence $\omega (\phi )$ ) is constant, in which case the Newtonian

188: gravitational constant is defined by $G=\phi ^{-1}$.

189: 

190: \subsection{The Basic hypothesis of our analisys}

191: 

192: In this work work, we will not suppose any trial function $\omega (\phi ),$

193: hence we will not propose any analitycal solution to the field equation;

194: instead we calculated $G(t)$, numerically, based in initial values of $\phi ,%

195: \dot{\phi}$ and of course $\omega (\phi )$ (given by the field equations).

196: We suppose that the scalar tensor theory can describe the present Universe

197: quite well, so we have to consider the recent experimental \ data about it.

198: We also assume that these data are hold, at least, during the last one

199: billion of years.

200: 

201: Clearly the equation of state of our work must be:

202: 

203: \begin{equation}

204: p=0,  \label{f8}

205: \end{equation}

206: that is a basic fact in the cosmology.

207: 

208: Now is official, the Universe is flat. With this headlines, the Physicsweb

209: site call the attention to work by Bernardis et al., in the Nature \cite

210: {Nature} , about the measures of the density of the Universe. This give us

211: another information to work, the tricurvature:

212: 

213: \begin{equation}

214: k=0  \label{f9}

215: \end{equation}

216: 

217: Last, but not least, is the observation that the Universe is expanding \cite

218: {accelerating}, not only expanding, but also accelerating, that is, the

219: deceleration parameter $q$ is:

220: 

221: \begin{equation}

222: q=-\frac{\ddot{a}a}{\dot{a}^{2}}=-1  \label{f10}

223: \end{equation}

224: where $a$ is the scale factor, that implies :

225: 

226: \begin{equation}

227: \frac{\dot{a}}{a}=H  \label{f11}

228: \end{equation}

229: where $H$ is the Huble parameter, and hence

230: 

231: \begin{equation}

232: a=e^{Ht}.  \label{f12}

233: \end{equation}

234: 

235: The field equations we have to work now are as follow:

236: 

237: For the Robertson-Walker's metric,

238: 

239: \begin{equation}

240: ds^{2}=dt^{2}-a(t)^{2}\left[ dx^{2}+dy^{2}+dz^{2}\right]  \label{f13}

241: \end{equation}

242: we find, then $(L_{m}=0):$

243: 

244: \begin{equation}

245: H^{2}=\frac{8\pi \rho }{3\phi }-\frac{\dot{\phi}}{\phi }H+\frac{\omega }{6}%

246: \frac{\dot{\phi}^{2}}{\phi ^{2}}  \label{f14}

247: \end{equation}

248: 

249: \begin{equation}

250: \ddot{\phi}+3H\dot{\phi}=-\frac{\dot{\phi}\dot{\omega}}{3+2\omega }+\frac{%

251: 8\pi }{3+2\omega }\left( \rho -3p\right)  \label{F15}

252: \end{equation}

253: 

254: \begin{equation}

255: \rho ^{\cdot }+3\frac{\dot{a}}{a}(\rho +p)=0.  \label{f16}

256: \end{equation}

257: 

258: One can isolate $\omega .$

259: 

260: \begin{equation}

261: \omega =6\frac{\phi ^{2}}{\dot{\phi}^{2}}\left[ H^{2}-\frac{8\pi \rho

262: _{o}e^{-3Ht}}{3\phi }+\frac{\dot{\phi}}{\phi }H\right]  \label{f17}

263: \end{equation}

264: and $\dot{\omega},$

265: 

266: \begin{equation*}

267: \dot{\omega}=12\left\{ \frac{\phi }{\dot{\phi}}-\frac{\phi ^{2}\ddot{\phi}}{%

268: \dot{\phi}^{3}}\right\} \left\{ H^{2}-\frac{8\pi \rho _{0}e^{-3Ht}}{3\phi }+%

269: \frac{\dot{\phi}}{\phi }H\right\} +

270: \end{equation*}

271: \begin{equation}

272: \frac{2}{3}\frac{1}{\dot{\phi}^{2}}+\left\{ 24\pi \rho _{0}e^{-3Ht}\left[

273: 3H\phi +\dot{\phi}\right] +H\left[ \ddot{\phi}\phi -\dot{\phi}^{2}\right]

274: \right\}

275: \end{equation}

276: 

277: Here $\rho _{0}$ is an initial value for the density. \ Putting $\omega $

278: and $\dot{\omega}$ in \ref{F15}, we can isolate $\ddot{\phi}.$ This is an

279: important point of this work, we use the diference finite method to

280: calculated the field variations. \ We can check that:

281: 

282: \begin{equation}

283: \ddot{\phi}=\frac{2H+8\pi \rho _{0}e^{-3Ht}-7H\dot{\phi}-12(\phi ^{2}/\dot{%

284: \phi})\left[ H^{2}-8\pi \rho _{0}e^{=3Ht}/(3\phi )+\phi H/\dot{\phi}\right] 

285: }{1+2H\phi /\dot{\phi}}  \label{F19}

286: \end{equation}

287: and can use :

288: 

289: \begin{equation}

290: \dot{\phi}(t+\Delta t)=\dot{\phi}(t)+\ddot{\phi}_{t}\Delta t  \label{f20}

291: \end{equation}

292: In the same way:

293: 

294: \begin{equation}

295: \phi (t+\Delta t)=\phi (t)+\dot{\phi}\Delta t  \label{f21}

296: \end{equation}

297: and we have recorrence. We still need some information, the intial values

298: for $\phi $ and $\dot{\phi}$ and will discuss it in the next section.

299: 

300: \section{The initial values problem.}

301: 

302: As we can see in \ref{F19}, $\ddot{\phi}$ depends on the density $\rho _{0}$%

303: , the Hubble parameter $H$, that are constants. $\ddot{\phi}$ depends also

304: of $\phi $ and $\ \dot{\phi}$ and the choice of these two intial values

305: determines the evolution of Newton gravitational constant. We remember that:

306: 

307: \begin{equation}

308: G=\frac{2\omega +4}{2\omega +3}\frac{1}{\phi }  \label{f22}

309: \end{equation}

310: Hence $\omega (\phi (t))$ and $\phi (t)$ must result, when we arrive at the

311: present Universe:

312: 

313: \begin{equation}

314: G=6.67\times 10^{-8}\mathrm{dyn.cm}^{2}\mathrm{g}^{-2}  \label{F23}

315: \end{equation}

316: 

317: Note that we start in the past and go to the present time, so we can have

318: values of $G$ in the past.\ref{F23} is a final value condition. The theory

319: has two free parmeters, the initial values for $\phi $ and $\dot{\phi}$, and

320: could have also two constraint, $G$ and $\dot{G},$ but there are few

321: measures of $\ \dot{G},$ so still there are some freedom in the choice of

322: initial values. At the end of this work, we show a result that consider the

323: limit value for $\dot{G}$. In the Brans-Dicke \cite{BD} theory, we have

324: 

325: \begin{equation}

326: \phi \propto \frac{1}{G}.  \label{f24}

327: \end{equation}

328: We use this fact as a guide to the choice of $\phi .$ For $\ \dot{\phi}$ we

329: use the relation:

330: 

331: \begin{equation}

332: \dot{\phi}\sim 10^{n}\phi .  \label{f25}

333: \end{equation}

334: $n$ is an integer. If we write:

335: 

336: \begin{equation}

337: \phi =\frac{b}{G}  \label{fphicg}

338: \end{equation}

339: where $b$ is a constant, each $n$ value will determine the value of $b$, (or

340: we can also work in the opposite sense) in order to satisfy relation \ref

341: {F23}. \emph{This is the important point of this work, we have to choice the

342: initial numerical values for }$\phi $ \emph{and for }$\dot{\phi}.$ \emph{%

343: These values held in the past, one billion years ago. So the ratios }$\dot{%

344: \phi}/\phi $ \emph{discussed here must be considered in the past. }

345: 

346: Finally, for $H$ we use the same value of \cite{BMN} \ that is :

347: 

348: \begin{equation}

349: H=0.7\times 10^{-10}yr^{-1}  \label{FH}

350: \end{equation}

351: $\rho _{0}$ comes from \cite{Wein} and it is :

352: 

353: \begin{equation}

354: \rho _{0}=2\times 10^{-29}\mathrm{g/cm}^{3}  \label{rho}

355: \end{equation}

356: Of course, when considering the past, we have to correct this density.

357: 

358: With these considerations, we have performed some possible situations, that

359: are presented in the next section.

360: 

361: \section{Results.}

362: 

363: We studied some possible cases, using the datas and methods explained above,

364: taking care that each step in our program means 10 millions of years. So in

365: the figures below, 100 means one billion of years ago.

366: 

367: The first case is the following: we have positive values for $\dot{\phi}$,

368: in a way that:

369: 

370: \begin{equation}

371: \dot{\phi}=10^{-n}\phi .

372: \end{equation}

373: 

374: \bigskip We performed our analisys for the case $n=2,3,4,6,8.$ In the figure

375: 1 we present our results for the \ \ \ case $n=1,2,3.$ \ In our picture, the

376: present time is on 0.0 and the past goes to right.

377: 

378: In figure 2, we studied another values. We use $n=4,6$ and 8 and $\dot{\phi}$

379: is positive. In the figure 2 we can these results.

380: 

381: As we can see, it%

382: %TCIMACRO{\UNICODE{0xb4}}%

383: %BeginExpansion

384: \'{}%

385: %EndExpansion

386: s interesting to work the case n=3. \ So we studied the cases: $n=2.5,$ and

387: the more interesting:

388: 

389: \begin{equation}

390: \dot{\phi}=2\times 10^{-3}\phi .

391: \end{equation}

392: In this case, the variation of $G(t)$ is slow and the calculated value for $%

393: \omega (\phi )$ is bigger than 500. This is in agreement with observacional

394: data \cite{Will}. More exactly, $\omega (\phi )\approx 889$ (for the present

395: time).\ This means that this is a good starting point to search the fine

396: tuning of the theory with the experimental \ data. In the figure 3 we have

397: the results.

398: 

399: For the sake of completeness, we also show the cases where we have a

400: negative $\dot{\phi}.$

401: 

402: \subsection{\protect\bigskip The fine tuning}

403: 

404: As a final result, after a search for the parameters that hold theory and

405: exprimental datas, we find that using:

406: 

407: \begin{equation*}

408: \phi \approx 0.92755/G

409: \end{equation*}

410: as the intial value (one billion years ago), and (also for one billion years

411: ago)

412: 

413: \begin{equation*}

414: \dot{\phi}=1.754236908125\times 10^{-3}\phi

415: \end{equation*}

416: we obtain the one posible value for $G,$ one billion of years ago:

417: 

418: \begin{equation*}

419: G_{past}\approx 7.54\times 10^{-8}\mathrm{dyn.cm}^{2}\mathrm{g}^{-2}

420: \end{equation*}

421: and the value for $\omega ,$ in the past, was, according to our computation

422: 

423: \begin{equation*}

424: \omega _{past}\approx 8.87

425: \end{equation*}

426: and the present value for $\omega $ is, according to our program: 

427: \begin{equation*}

428: \omega \approx 8.24\times 10^{21}

429: \end{equation*}

430: and finally, the present ratio: 

431: \begin{equation*}

432: \frac{\dot{G}}{G}\approx -5.77\times 10^{-13}/yr

433: \end{equation*}

434: Note that, because we have so small experimental value for this ratio, we

435: have to use several digits in $\dot{\phi}$ .

436: 

437: These are the initial results of our proposal of perform an numerical

438: analisys of the consequences of the scalar tensor theories of gravitation.

439: We hope that these informations can be used in another investigations of the

440: cosmological parameters.

441: 

442: \section{Discussion and Conclusion.}

443: 

444: In this work, we consider the scalar-tensor theory of gravitation, \ which

445: the has the proposal of study of the Neton%

446: %TCIMACRO{\UNICODE{0xb4}}%

447: %BeginExpansion

448: \'{}%

449: %EndExpansion

450: s gravitational constant. We didn%

451: %TCIMACRO{\UNICODE{0xb4}}%

452: %BeginExpansion

453: \'{}%

454: %EndExpansion

455: t sugest any analitycal solution to the field equations. What we have done

456: is, based in some justified hypothesis, to calculated numerically the

457: solutions for the fields ($\phi )$, the coupling constant ($\omega )$, and

458: the main point, the values of $G(t).$ On despite that the field equations

459: are non-linear in $\phi $ and $\dot{\phi}$ we have two constraints ($G$ and $%

460: \left| \dot{G}/G\right| $ )\ that filter the possibilities. It%

461: %TCIMACRO{\UNICODE{0xb4}}%

462: %BeginExpansion

463: \'{}%

464: %EndExpansion

465: s useful to study if we can aply the uniquiness of solution under these

466: conditions.

467: 

468: We consider that numerical analisys presented is quite interesting, because

469: shows the possible evolutions for the value of the Newton%

470: %TCIMACRO{\UNICODE{0xb4}}%

471: %BeginExpansion

472: \'{}%

473: %EndExpansion

474: s gravitational constant $G$ in a recent period of the Universe, based in a

475: Scalar Tensor Theory of gravitation. The same idea can be used to make some

476: predictions about future values of G. We believe that, if one consider our

477: basic hypothesis valid, ($k=0,$ accelerating Universe, $p=0)$ it%

478: %TCIMACRO{\UNICODE{0xb4}}%

479: %BeginExpansion

480: \'{}%

481: %EndExpansion

482: s worthwhile to work to find the intial values of $\phi $ and $\dot{\phi}$

483: that results in the present values of $G$ and $\dot{G}$ (if the last one is

484: measured). The numerical approach used here can be improved to work with a

485: more accurate step in the program (less than 10 millions of years). Another

486: point is that our computational program shows that is possible a change in

487: the signal of $\dot{G},$ so we may especulate that $G$ can start to grow.

488: 

489: We can also consider that, if the Newton%

490: %TCIMACRO{\UNICODE{0xb4}}%

491: %BeginExpansion

492: \'{}%

493: %EndExpansion

494: s gravitational constant have changed in the last one billion of years,

495: there are consequences and evidences that can be search in the geological or

496: astronomical fields of knowledge, for a compreensive discussion about these

497: implications, see \cite{Wein}. Eventually, the study of gravitational waves

498: can give some information about the value of $G$ in the past, or , in the

499: opposite sense, these study can use some information about the numerical

500: evolution of $G,$ gravitational waves in the scalar-tensor theories are

501: studied in \cite{GWSTT}.

502: 

503: As a final consideration, we remember that we use $L_{m}=0.$ It%

504: %TCIMACRO{\UNICODE{0xb4}}%

505: %BeginExpansion

506: \'{}%

507: %EndExpansion

508: s possible propose many different forms for $L_{m}.$ In our humble opinion,

509: if we think that even the theorethical part is not solved yet, hence the

510: numerical one, in a way that it%

511: %TCIMACRO{\UNICODE{0xb4}}%

512: %BeginExpansion

513: \'{}%

514: %EndExpansion

515: s possible to perform several \ approachs to the problem.

516: 

517: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

518: \bibitem{Dirac}  Dirac,P.A.M.; Nature, \textbf{139, }323 (1937);

519: Proc.Roy.Soc., \textbf{A165,} 199 (1938).

520: 

521: \bibitem{BD}  Brans, C.; Dicke, R.H., Phys. Rev., \textbf{124,} 925 (1961)

522: 

523: \bibitem{STT}  Barrow, J.D., \textit{Varying G and Other Constants}, at LANL

524: site

525: 

526: \bibitem{srr}  Hellings, R. Phys. Rev. Lett \textbf{51, }1609 (1983);

527: Pitjeva, E.V, 

528: %TCIMACRO{\UNICODE{0xb4}}%

529: %BeginExpansion

530: \'{}%

531: %EndExpansion

532: %TCIMACRO{\UNICODE{0xb4}}%

533: %BeginExpansion

534: \'{}%

535: %EndExpansion

536: \textit{Dynamics and Astrometry of Natural and Artificial Celestial

537: Bodies'', }Kluver Acad. Publ. Nethelands, pg 251 (1997).

538: 

539: \bibitem{llr}  Dickey, J.O, et al., Science \textbf{265, }482 (1994).

540: 

541: \bibitem{BMN}  Bronikov, K.A.;Melnikov, V.N.; Novello, M.; Grav. \& Cosml.

542: Suppl II, 18 (2002)-gr-qc/0208028.

543: 

544: \bibitem{BP}  Barrow, J.D.; Parsons, P.; Phys. Rev. D, \textbf{55}, 1906

545: (1997)

546: 

547: \bibitem{Nature}  Bernardis, P.de, et al., Nature, 955, \textbf{404, (}2000).

548: 

549: \bibitem{accelerating}  Riess A.G; et al. Observacional Evidence from

550: Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant

551: -Astronomical Journal astro-ph/9805201.

552: 

553: \bibitem{Will}  Will, C.M., \textit{Theory and Experiment in Gravitational

554: Physics, }2nd edn, Cambridge UP, Cambridge (1993)

555: 

556: \bibitem{Wein}  Weinberg, S. 

557: %TCIMACRO{\UNICODE{0xb4}}%

558: %BeginExpansion

559: \'{}%

560: %EndExpansion

561: \textit{%

562: %TCIMACRO{\UNICODE{0xb4}}%

563: %BeginExpansion

564: \'{}%

565: %EndExpansion

566: Gravitation and Cosmology'', Priciples and Aplications of the general Theory

567: of} \textit{Relativity.},630-631, John Wiley and Sons, New York, (1972)

568: 

569: \bibitem{GWSTT}  Maia, M.R.G.;Barrow, J.D. ; Phys. Rev. D \textbf{50, }6263

570: (1994).

571: \end{thebibliography}

572: 

573: \pagebreak 

574: 

575: \begin{center}

576: {\Large Captions}

577: \end{center}

578: 

579: \bigskip 

580: 

581: \textbf{Fig 1:G as a time function, when we consider the some ratios between 

582: }$\phi $\textbf{\ and }$\dot{\phi},$\textbf{\ in this case }$\dot{\phi}/\phi

583: =10^{-n}$\textbf{, where }$n=1($solid line),$2($long dashed line)\textbf{\

584: or 3(shor dashed line) . It%

585: %TCIMACRO{\UNICODE{0xb4}}%

586: %BeginExpansion

587: \'{}%

588: %EndExpansion

589: s important to observe that in this picture, the time goes from the right to

590: left, being 0.00 the present time and 100 one billion of years ago. The same

591: notation is used in the another grafics. }

592: 

593: \begin{center}

594: \bigskip 

595: \end{center}

596: 

597: \textbf{Fig 2:\ The case n=4,(solid) 6 (dashed) and 8. }$\dot{\phi}$ \textbf{%

598: is positive}.\textbf{We can see that n=6 and n=8producesalmost the same

599: results, so one line superposes the another. We can also see that we have a

600: growing G(t), and also note this is an acceleratting growing. Due this we

601: will eliminate these results of a ``fine tunning'' analisys.}

602: 

603: \bigskip 

604: 

605: \textbf{Fig 3:A study for the cases with n=2.5(long dashed) and n=3, (}$\dot{%

606: \phi}=2\times 10^{-3}\phi )$\textbf{(short dashed)}$.$\textbf{For }$\dot{\phi%

607: }=10^{-3}\phi $\textbf{\ (solid line) we can observe a minimum. We can see

608: there are an interesting result and worked it as a starting point of a

609: search for a better fitting of the theorethical parameters.}

610: 

611: \bigskip 

612: 

613: \textbf{Fig 4:G(t) in the cases we have negative values for the intial value

614: of }$\dot{\phi}.$ \textbf{We use n=4,(solid line) , 6 (long dashed) and 8

615: (short dashed). Again one result superposes another. The cases n=3 and n=2

616: have resulted inconsistent values and oscilations.}

617: 

618: \bigskip 

619: 

620: \begin{center}

621: \bigskip 

622: \end{center}

623: 

624: \end{document}

625: