1: \chapter{Future Projects}
2: Since astronomical tests of the Einstein equivalence principle with respect to gravitational
3: birefringence are a relatively new area of research, we are left with several promising but so far
4: unexplored ideas which have the potential not only for setting sharp upper limits on this effect
5: but also for possible direct detections. We present in this chapter a selection of two elaborated
6: but not yet finished examples where gravity-induced birefringence could either serve as a possible
7: important contribution for a satisfying interpretation of current data or could show up as a new
8: effect in atomic spectra under certain conditions.
9:
10: The first example is concerned with the problem of circular polarization from active galactic nuclei
11: (AGN). Under the reasonable assumption that synchrotron radiation is the main source for polarized
12: radio emission, the degree of circular polarization measured in those AGN is on average an order of
13: magnitude higher than expected from synchrotron theory. The suggested classical solution in terms
14: of circular repolarization is not free from contradictions which leads to the conclusion that a
15: gravity-induced crosstalk between linearly and circularly polarized light could provide an important
16: contribution for solving this puzzle. The second example is concerned with gravitational red shift
17: measurements in nonmetric theories of gravity. While in metric theories of gravity the ticking rates
18: of (atomic) clocks are independent on their internal structure, i.e. the red shift is universal, this
19: universality is violated for clocks which are affected by nonmetric gravitational fields. Defining
20: three atomic clocks by different transitions of hydrogen one gets three different red shift predictions
21: which could be tested in astronomical spectra of compact objects or under well defined laboratory conditions.
22:
23: In the last part of this chapter we briefly discuss two further ideas for promising future projects.
24: We suggest to compare the polarization properties of multiple images generated by gravitational lenses to
25: look for traces of gravity-induced alterations due to the propagation of light through different gravitational
26: potentials. The last issue picks up the current controversy about an intrinsic anisotropy of space time
27: where the underlying data could be explained in terms of cosmological birefringence.
28:
29:
30: \newpage
31: \section{Circular Polarization of AGN}
32: Active galactic nuclei (AGN) are characterized by a huge variety of high energy phenomena
33: and nonthermal radiation processes which cannot be ascribed to normal stellar activity.
34: Instead it is commonly accepted, that the main central engine is driven by a super-massive
35: black hole, whose strong gravitational field in combination with magnetic fields and
36: relativistic jets feeds the processes which supply the kind of radiation which is central
37: to our current investigation. Of special interest are in this regard the compact,
38: extragalactic radio sources which belong to the class of active galaxies. Typical
39: representatives are Quasars and BL Lac objects, named after the prototype BL-Lacertae with
40: strong, variable polarization and weak emission lines (Blazar). A further important example
41: is provided by our own galaxy with the central radio source in Sagittarius A*. The optical
42: brightness of all these objects is often clearly exceeded by emission in the radio regime with a
43: nonthermal spectrum and non-zero degrees of polarization.
44:
45: The most plausible, dominant mechanism for such radio emission in AGN is usually considered
46: to be synchrotron radiation from an ensemble of relativistic electrons. Concerning the
47: often differently used notations it is important to mention, that usually the name cyclotron
48: radiation is reserved for emission from low-energy electrons whereas synchrotron radiation
49: traditionally describes emission from highly relativistic electrons because it was first
50: observed in 1948 in electron synchrotrons. While it is usual to use the notion 'cyclotron
51: radiation' with respect to magnetic white dwarfs without regarding different energies, the
52: traditional distinction between cyclotron and synchrotron radiation is used in most of the
53: relevant literature concerning AGN and therefore also used here.
54:
55: Our special interest in this context applies to the origin of circular polarization observed
56: in only a few AGNs. Analysis of the collation of circular polarization data presented by
57: Weiler and De Pater in 1983 \cite{wdp83} revealed that out of 50 radio galaxies and 43 quasars,
58: circular polarization was detected for only 6 radio galaxies and 15 quasars.
59: Although at a first glance it seems very likely that a synchrotron process has to be
60: considered as the source, the small degrees of circular polarization observed in many AGN
61: has a frequency dependence and time variability that is not consistent with the simple
62: predictions based on the intrinsic polarization of synchrotron emission (see \cite{sasa} also
63: for a huge list of references). Likewise the observed degrees of circular polarization are
64: often indeed small but nevertheless too high for a simple synchrotron source. It was therefore
65: suggested that the circular polarization is due to a propagation effect where the
66: elliptic eigenmodes of a relativistic plasma effects cyclic conversion of linear polarization
67: into circular polarization \cite{kme98}. However, this approach is again not free of
68: difficulties so we suggest that a conversion mechanism due to gravitational birefringence
69: might solve these problems and contribute a significant fraction to the observed circular
70: polarization.
71:
72: In the following we give a brief overview on some of the relevant data, mainly focussed on
73: observations of the galactic center in Sagittarius A* (Sgr A*) and discuss the conventional,
74: propagation induced polarization mechanisms. We outline the idea how gravity-induced birefringence
75: could account for the observed polarization.
76:
77: \subsection{Polarization properties of synchrotron emission}
78: Following the current understanding, the radio emission of AGN is mainly produced by highly
79: relativistic electrons which move on helical paths along magnetic field lines. A single electron
80: moving with the synchro-cyclotron frequency $\omega_c$ emitts its radiation in a narrow cone
81: of half-angle $\gamma^{-1}$ along the instantaneous trajectory, where $\gamma$ denotes the
82: usual Lorentz factor. For a distant observer this gives a continuous spectrum with a
83: peak at the frequency $\omega_m \propto \gamma^3 \omega_c$. Considering an isotropic and
84: homogeneous ensemble of relativistic
85: electrons within a magnetic field having a power-law energy distribution such that the
86: particle density between $E$ and $E+dE$ can be written as $N(E)\,dE\propto E^{-\Gamma}dE$,
87: one finds that the total intensity observed from the source is $I(\nu)\propto a(\Gamma)
88: (B\sin\theta)^{(\Gamma+1)/2}\nu^{-(\Gamma-1)/2}$, where $a(\Gamma)$ is a slowly varying
89: function of $\Gamma$ and $\theta$ denotes the pitch angle with respect to the magnetic field.
90: The spectral energy distribution, i.e. the dependence of intensity $I_{\nu}$ or flux $F_{\nu}$
91: on the frequency can often be approximated by a power law $I_{\nu}\propto \nu^{-\alpha}$ at least
92: over limited frequency ranges. The exponent $\alpha$, called the spectral index is related to
93: $\Gamma$ by $\Gamma=2\alpha+1$.
94:
95: In the optically thin case, the polarization plane is perpendicular to the projected magnetic
96: field with a linear polarization degree of $m_L=(\Gamma+1)/(\Gamma+7/3)$. In the optically thick
97: regime, the total intensity spectrum reaches a $\nu^{5/2}$ dependency, while the degree of
98: linear polarization now becomes $m_L=3/(6\Gamma+13)$, with the electric vector being maximum
99: parallel to the projected field. The degree of linear polarization can reach theoretically up
100: to $\sim 70$\% but this high level is only rarely observed. Currently, there are two accepted
101: mechanisms which can cause depolarization: Unresolved inhomogenities within the source and
102: the presence of Faraday rotation internal to the source. The last point will be discussed in
103: more detail later.
104:
105: Besides linear polarization, the theory of synchrotron radiation predicts that there should
106: also be a small amount of circular polarization \cite{legg}. Considering again a single
107: electron gyrating in a magnetic field ${\bf B_0}$ which is directed along ${\bf k}$, the circular
108: polarization is right-handed when the direction of motion passes close to the line-of-sight (LoS)
109: on the opposite side of ${\bf B_0}$, while it is left-handed if it passes close to the LoS
110: on the same side as ${\bf B_0}$. Therefore, in an ensemble of electrons with an isotropic
111: distribution of pitch angles one finds approximately as many electrons contributing to right-
112: and left-handed polarization within the emission cone so that, to first order, the circular
113: polarization cancels out, leaving the emission linearly polarized. However, Legg \& Westfold \cite{legg}
114: proposed that the total emission from an ensemble of gyrating electrons could have a net circular
115: polarization if the number of electrons contributing to the observed radiation with right- and
116: left-handed polarization is not equal.
117: For an isotropic distribution of electrons, Legg \& Westfold showed that this condition is satisfied.
118: The standard equation for the degree of circular polarization for an optically thin, homogeneous
119: synchrotron source as given by Melrose in 1971 \cite{mel71} reads
120: \begin{equation}\label{mc}
121: m_c = \frac{\cot\theta}{3}\left(\frac{\nu}{3\nu_B\sin\theta}\right)^
122: {-1/2}f(\alpha) \approx \cot\theta/\gamma\quad ,
123: \end{equation}
124: with $\theta$: angle between the field and the line of sight; $\nu$: emission frequency in Hz and
125: $\nu_B$ is the electron gyrofrequency. $f(\alpha)$ is a weak function of the spectral index $\alpha$;
126: for optically thick emission in the limit of strong Faraday rotation, $f(\alpha)$ varies monotonically
127: between 0.6 and 2.0 for $\alpha$ between 0 and 2 \cite{mel71}.
128: Using typical source parameters like $B\approx 1$mG, $\sin\theta\approx 1$ and $\nu=1$GHz one can
129: expect a level of $m_c\approx 0.1$\%. Usually, $m_c$ is smaller than 0.1\% in AGN with only few
130: cases for which CP approaches 0.5\% \cite{rns00}. In an optically thick source the degree of CP remains
131: similar, only modified by a term of order unity dependent on the distribution of relativistic electrons
132: \cite{mel71}. Equation (\ref{mc}) implies that CP is mainly produced by particles with low
133: Lorentz factor $\gamma$, or by emission nearly parallel to the magnetic field (small $\theta$).
134: Furthermore, it is important to note that CP produced by a synchrotron process is expected to show
135: a $\nu^{-1/2}$ dependence as can be seen from (\ref{mc}).
136: \subsection{Observations}
137: This section will present a brief summary of the most important results concerning circular polarization
138: measurements in AGN over the last few years. We do not lay claim to completeness and we apologies
139: for omissions.
140: \subsubsection{Sagittarius A*}
141: Studies of stellar proper motion in the vicinity of the nonthermal radio source Sagittarius
142: A* \cite{ghez} revealed a highly compact object with a mass of $\sim 2.5\times 10^6 M_{\odot}$
143: on a scale less than 0.01 pc. Hence, the most conservative interpretation for this is given
144: today by a super-massive black hole with a synchrotron emission region, fed through accretion.
145:
146: The first detection of CP radiation from Sgr A* was made by Bower, Falke, \&
147: Backer in 1998 \cite{bow99}. Using the Very Large Array (VLA) they measured an average fractional
148: polarization of $m_c=-0.36\%\pm 0.05\%$ at 4.8 GHz and of $m_c=-0.26\%\pm 0.06\%$ at 8.4 GHz,
149: respectively. The average spectral index $(m_c\propto \nu^{\alpha})$ was $\alpha = -0.6\pm 0.3$.
150: Since the special off-axis design makes the VLA a poor instrument for CP
151: measurements, it is important that this result was later confirmed by Sault and Macquart
152: \cite{sma99} who used two archival and one new ATCA (Australia Telescope Compact Array)
153: observation.
154:
155: Multifrequency observations of CP and LP in Sagittarius A* were reported
156: recently in 2002 by Bower et al. \cite{bow02}. They obtained 13 epochs of VLA observations at 1.4,
157: 4.8, 8.4 and 15 GHz in summer 1999 and 11 epochs from ATCA at 4.8 and 8.5 GHz in the same year.
158: Their measured mean fractional polarizations are given in the following table, together with data
159: taken from the VLA archives.
160:
161: \begin{center}
162: \begin{tabular}{|l|cccc|}\hline
163: & & & & \\
164: Data from & 1.4 GHz & 4.8 GHz & 8.4 GHz & 15 GHz \\
165: & (\%) & (\%) & (\%) & (\%) \\ \hline
166: VLA 1999 & -0.21 $\pm$ 0.10 & -0.31 $\pm$ 0.13 & -0.34 $\pm$ 0.18 & -0.62 $\pm$ 0.26 \\
167: ATCA 1999 & ... & -0.37 $\pm$ 0.08 & -0.27 $\pm$ 0.10 & ... \\
168: VLA archive & ... & -0.31 $\pm$ 0.13 & -0.36 $\pm$ 0.10 & ...\\ \hline
169: \end{tabular}
170:
171: \vspace{0.3cm}
172: \small {Tab. 5.1: Mean fractional circular polarization from Bower et al. 2002 \cite{bow02}.}
173: \end{center}
174: For the low frequencies they repoted a spectral index $\alpha\approx -0.5$ while for higher
175: frequencies the spectrum was best matched by $\alpha\approx 1.5$. Changes in CP were accompanied
176: by small changes in the total intensity, suggesting that the processes driving these phenomena
177: are fundamentally linked. Concerning LP, Bower et al. reported no detection with an upper limit
178: of 0.2\% at 8.4 GHz, less than 0.2\% at 22 GHz and less than $\sim 1\%$ at 112 GHz. Aitken et
179: al. \cite{ait} have claimed 10\% of LP at $\nu > 150$GHz, on the basis of low-resolution James
180: Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT) observations, but this detection is so far not confirmed.
181: \subsubsection{Quasars and BL Lacs}
182: A recent ATCA-survey by Rayner et al. \cite{rns00} for CP in radio-loud Quasars, BL Lacs and
183: Radio Galaxies has revealed fractional CP at 5 GHz between 0.05\% and 0.5\% in 11 out of 13
184: sources at a spatial resolution of 2 arcsec. Also, VLBI measurements from Homan \& Wardle in 1999
185: \cite{howa} yielded localized CP of 0.3\% up to 1\% in the jet-cores of 3C273, PKS 0528+134 and
186: 3C279 (1\%), while a few cases may be as high as the local linear polarization. Brunthaler et al.
187: \cite{brun} measured CP in the compact radio jet of the nearby spiral galaxy M81*. They reported
188: a value of $m_c=0.54\%\pm 0.06\%\pm 0.07\%$ at 8.4 GHz and $m_c=0.27\% \pm 0.06\% \pm 0.07\%$ at
189: 4.8 GHz with an error separation into statistical and systematic terms. Similar to Sgr A* they
190: detected no LP im M81* at a level of 0.1\%.
191:
192: \subsection{Problem}
193: Although LP observed in AGN is generally accepted as being produced by a synchrotron process, the
194: correct interpretation of the high levels of CP in AGN is still unclear. The theoretically predicted
195: degree of LP due to synchrotron emission is about 70\% - a level which is rarely observed so that
196: several depolarization mechanisms like Faraday rotation or strongly tangled magnetic fields have
197: been discussed in order to explain that the observed LP is often at least an order of magnitude lower.
198: By taking these various mechanisms into account, the low LP is not really a surprise. But, what is a
199: surprise are the high levels of CP given these stringent limits on LP. Applying the same depolarization
200: mechanisms also to CP, the observed levels should also be an order of magnitude lower than the
201: predicted 0.1\% from equation (\ref{mc}). Additionally, one must take into account that the
202: $m_c\propto\nu^{-1/2}$ dependence as expected from synchrotron emission is generally not observed
203: \cite{sasa}. For this reasons it is commonly recognized, that simple synchrotron models cannot account
204: for the full polarization characteristics without depolarization or repolarization, discussed later
205: here, in the source or the accretion region. We will therefore briefly recall the circular repolarization
206: mechanism, first invented by Pacholczyk in 1970 \cite{pch70} where CP is explained as being due to a
207: propagation effect. We point out some difficulties of this approach and suggest a perhaps more suitable
208: propagation effect: Gravitational birefringence.
209:
210: \subsubsection{Circular repolarization}
211: For a given polarization mode with Stokes parameters $I$, $Q$, $U$ and $V$ it is possible to define
212: a second polarization mode with the same $I$ but opposite $Q$, $U$ and $V$ as an equivalent
213: solution of the Maxwell equations. While these so-called orthogonal modes can travel
214: independently with the same propagation velocity through empty space and homogeneous
215: isotropic media, in astrophysical magnetized plasmas, however different polarization
216: modes have different propagation velocities. In such a plasma for a given propagation
217: direction with respect to the magnetic field, one can always find two such eigenmodes
218: which travel through this medium with different propagation velocities, but without
219: changing their polarization vector. Such a medium with two refractive indices is called
220: birefringent. In general, birefringence will be elliptical, i.e. the eigenmodes have linear
221: and circular contributions.
222: The transfer equation for a Stokes vector, subjected to magnetooptical effects due to
223: different refractive indices in an anisotropic medium without absorption is of the form
224: (Melrose \& McPhedran 1991 \cite{mel91}, p.188)
225: \begin{equation}\label{trans}
226: \frac{d}{ds}\left(\begin{array}{c} I \\ Q \\ U \\ V \end{array}\right) =
227: \left(\begin{array}{cccc} 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & -\rho_V & \rho_U \\
228: 0 & \rho_V & 0 & -\rho_Q \\ 0 & -\rho_U & \rho_Q
229: & 0 \end{array}\right)
230: \left(\begin{array}{c} I \\ Q \\ U \\ V \end{array}\right)
231: \end{equation}
232: with
233: \begin{equation}
234: \rho_Q = -\Delta k \frac{T^2-1}{T^2+1}\cos(2\psi),\quad
235: \rho_U = -\Delta k \frac{T^2-1}{T^2+1}\sin(2\psi),\quad
236: \rho_V = -\Delta k \frac{2T}{T^2+1}\quad .
237: \end{equation}
238: Here, $s$ denotes the distance along the ray path, $\Delta k$ the difference in wavenumber
239: between the eigenmodes and $\psi$ the polarization angle. $T$ is the axial ratio of the
240: polarization ellipse of one of the eigenmodes. Regarding the physical relevance, we basically
241: distinguish between circularly and linearly polarized eigenmodes.
242:
243: In the first case, circular polarization implies a polarization ellipse with an axial ratio
244: equal to unity, i.e. $|T_{\pm}| = 1$, '+' and '-' denoting the orthogonal modes. Hence,
245: $\rho_Q=\rho_U=0$, so that (\ref{trans}) reduces to
246: \begin{equation}
247: \frac{d}{ds}\left(\begin{array}{c} Q \\ U \end{array}\right) = \rho_V
248: \left(\begin{array}{cc} 0 & -1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{array}\right)
249: \left(\begin{array}{c} Q \\ U \end{array}\right) \quad .
250: \end{equation}
251: Here, the transfer equation leaves $I$ and $V$ unaffected, while $U$ and $Q$ changes only
252: such that the polarization angle $\psi = 1/2 \arctan U/Q$ rotates according
253: \begin{equation}
254: \frac{d\psi}{ds} = \frac{1}{2}\rho_V \quad ,
255: \end{equation}
256: which is commonly known as Faraday rotation. Otherwise, if the natural modes are linearly
257: polarized this corresponds to $T=0$ or $T=\infty$ so we get from (\ref{trans})
258: \begin{equation}
259: \frac{d}{ds}Q = \rho_U V\, , \quad \frac{d}{ds}U = -\rho_Q V \quad .
260: \end{equation}
261: This means that if the natural modes are linear or also elliptical then radiation that is initially
262: linearly polarized develops a circularly polarized component as the polarization changes in a periodic
263: manner along the ray path \cite{pch73}.
264: Following Kennett \& Melrose \cite{kme98} we can therefore write
265: \begin{eqnarray}
266: V(\nu) &=& U_0(\nu)\sin(\lambda^3\mbox{RRM}), \\[0.5cm]
267: \mbox{RRM} &=& 3\times 10^4\left(\frac{L}{1\,\mbox{pc}}\right)\left\langle{\cal E}_L\left(\frac{n_r}
268: {1\,\mbox{cm}^{-3}}\right)\left(\frac{B}{1\,\mbox{G}}\right)^2\sin^2\theta\right\rangle\mbox{rad m}^{-3}
269: \end{eqnarray}
270: The relativistic rotation measure RRM describes quantitatively the strength of circular repolarization,
271: namely the phaseshift $\Delta\Phi$ between the two natural modes, depending on the special details of
272: the distribution of relativistic particles and the local magnetic field ${\bf B}$. $n_r$ denotes the
273: particle density, $L$ the path length within the source region and ${\cal E}_L$ the minimum Lorentz
274: factor of the plasma.
275: \subsection{Gravitational birefringence and repolarization}
276: Although the conditions required for the observed circular polarization of some synchrotron sources
277: due to circular repolarization are indeed not impossible, they are rather very restrictive. We present two
278: situations in which this mechanism might operate, point to some difficulties and discuss the possible
279: alternative mechanism of gravitational birefringence which could circumvent several problems.
280:
281: In the first situation where circular repolarization might operate, the relativistic particles dominate
282: within the plasma, so that the natural modes are linearly polarized. Requiring either $\mbox{RRM}\lambda\sim 1$
283: in a small part of the source or $\mbox{RRM}\lambda\sim 10^{-3}$ over a large part leads to
284: significant circular polarization, comparable to the degree emitted from synchrotron radiation.
285: However, the frequency dependence is more like $m_c \propto \omega^{-3}$ than $m_c \propto \omega^{-1/2}$
286: predicted for a uniform, optically thin synchrotron source \cite{kme98}. The second situation
287: assumes that the plasma is a mixture of cold and relativistic particles causing the natural modes to have
288: a small circular component. The relative phase shift $\Delta\Phi$ between the two natural modes is then
289: determined by the cold plasma, and provided that $\Delta\Phi \ll 1$, the resulting circular polarization
290: is of the order of the eccentricity of the modes. This situation implies $m_c \propto \omega^{-1}$.
291:
292: Even though these scenarios seem to be quite realistic, the existing data do not appear consistent with
293: $m_c \propto \omega^{-a}$ with either $a=0.5$ or $a=1$ \cite{kme98}. Another problem concerns the ratio
294: of linear to circular polarization. For a homogeneous optically thin synchrotron source and a highly
295: relativistic plasma one expects $m_l/m_c\gsim 100$ \cite{jod77} while Ryle and Brodie \cite{rb81} reported
296: sources with even $m_l/m_c\gsim 1$. This problem is also known as the ''circular polarization excess''.
297:
298: To summarize up we can say, that despite the different possibilities which have been discussed so far, the
299: mechanism for the production of circular polarization in AGNs is still not known with absolute certainty.
300: The question therefore arises if gravity-induced birefringence could serve as an important source for
301: circular polarization which could solve some of the problems, mentioned above. Such a gravitational conversion
302: of linearly to circularly polarized light might be possible for rays emitted from the same pointlike source
303: and is independent of the special conditions within the plasma, e.g. the amount of cold electrons and the
304: optical thickness of the source. However, one obstacle is that the birefringence models we have used up to
305: now are appropriate for stars with spherical symmetry where one can, in principle, assign to each pointsource
306: on the surface a heliocentric angle $\theta=\arccos\mu$. Consequently, the quality of our limits on
307: birefringence strongly depends on the amount of available information about the source. It is clear that
308: the situation is now quite different in the case of an active galactic nuclei. Of course a first primitive
309: ansatz could consist in putting the nuclei inside an imaginary sphere and locate the relativistic jet as the
310: source of linearly polarized light at the limb of this sphere. Using the metric-affine phase shift formula
311: (\ref{mag-form}) with the parameters of Sagittarius A*, e.g. $M_{SgrA}=2.5\times 10^6\, M_{\odot}$,
312: $\lambda=6\times 10^{-2}m$ and $R_{SgrA} = 0.01$pc we get a phase shift of $\Delta\Phi=0.056\times 10^{-11}
313: \,k^2$. It is currently not possible to decide, whether this value of $\Delta\Phi$ is sufficient to
314: convert a reasonable amount of linearly into circularly polarized light because of the complete lack of a
315: reliable estimate for $k^2$ of a supermassive black hole. Furthermore it is currently unclear how the
316: observed wavelength is correlated to the emission radius. A further important aspect which could test for a
317: possible influence of birefringence is the frequency dependence of the polarized radiation, described by the
318: spectral index. As already mentioned above, the synchrotron model as well as the circular repolarization
319: model fail to predict the correct frequency dependence. The hope is, that a combined model which incorporates
320: repolarization as well as birefringence might be able to provide here a better fit to the observations.
321:
322: \section{Gravitational redshift measurements}
323: Since electromagnetism was the only fundamental interaction besides gravity that was known
324: in 1915 and for which this generalization was relevant, Einstein himself suggested the first
325: test of this new principle by showing that an electromagnetic wave propagating between points
326: with different gravitational potentials as a consequence must suffer a red shift.
327: Therefore, measurements of the gravitational redshift belong to the first classical tests
328: of the EEP.
329:
330: In every metric theory of gravity, the frequencies of two identical atomic clocks at rest at different locations
331: ${\bf x_1}$ and ${\bf x_2}$ in a static gravitational potential differ according to
332: \begin{equation}
333: z = \frac{\nu_1-\nu_2}{\nu_2}=\sqrt{\frac{g_{00}({\bf x_1})}{g_{00}({\bf x_2})}}-1 \quad ,
334: \end{equation}
335: so that for weak gravitational fields, e.g. $g_{00}=1+2\Phi \, (c\equiv 1)$, where $\Phi$ is the Newtonian
336: gravitational potential to first order, this yields
337: \begin{equation}\label{redsft}
338: z = \Phi({\bf x_1}) - \Phi({\bf x_2}) \quad .
339: \end{equation}
340: Since the derivation of (\ref{redsft}) is only based on the validity of the weak equivalence principle and the
341: conservation of energy, this prediction is independent of the special form of the field equations of a certain
342: theory and therefore valid for every metric theory of gravity. Congruously, this result was put in the form of
343: a conjecture by Will \cite{will74}:
344:
345: \vspace{0.5cm}
346: \noindent\fbox{\begin{minipage}{\textwidth}
347: \begin{center} \vspace{0.5cm}
348: {\bf Universal gravitational redshift conjecture (UGR):}
349:
350: \vspace{0.5cm}
351: Any complete, self-consistent, and relativistic theory of gravity that embodies the universality of
352: gravitational redshift is neccesarily a metric theory.
353: \vspace{0.5cm}
354: \end{center}
355: \end{minipage}}
356: \vspace{0.5cm}
357:
358: \noindent A simple plausibility argument supporting this statement can be given by means of the metric postulates
359: (see Sec.1.2.3, p.7). Since in a local free-falling reference frame the physical laws are those of special
360: relativity, the frequencies of free-falling atoms are functions only of the universal atomic constants
361: and therefore independent of the external gravitational field. Consequently, a comparison of the frequencies
362: of the free-falling atoms involves only a comparison of their space-time trajectories, but since these
363: trajectories are universal, the measured red shift is universal. Nonmetric theories of gravity violate, per
364: definition, one or more of the metric postulates and therefore do not predict a universal redshift.
365: On the contrary, Will \cite{will74} has shown that in nonmetric theories of gravity the ticking rates of
366: atomic clocks in a gravitational field and, so, the gravitational redshift are affected in a manner that
367: depends on their internal structure. By applying the gravitationally modified Dirac equation in the
368: $TH\epsilon\mu$ formalism to the hydrogen atom, he found that the predicted redshifts of clocks, defined
369: by transitions between principal levels, between fine-structure levels and between two hyperfine levels are
370: given by
371: \begin{eqnarray}
372: z_P &=& T^{-1/2}(T\epsilon^2/H) - 1 \label{th-red_P}\\
373: z_F &=& T^{-1/2}(T\epsilon^2/H)^2 - 1 \\
374: z_H &=& T^{-1/2}(T\epsilon^2/H) (\epsilon/\mu) - 1 \label{th-red_H}\quad ,
375: \end{eqnarray}
376: with one clock being far away from the gravitational potential $(\Phi({\bf x_1})=0,\,{\bf x_1}\to\infty)$.
377: In order to explore the physical consequences of these predictions, we focus attention in a first step on
378: weak gravitational fields $(\Phi \lsim 10^{-5})$ so that the results can be used for tests within the solar
379: system $(\Phi \sim 10^{-6})$ and also in good approximation for white dwarfs. In the weak field limit, the
380: functions $T$, $H$, $\epsilon$ and $\mu$ are expanded in power series in $\Phi$ according to \cite{ll73}
381: \begin{eqnarray}
382: T &=& 1 - 2\alpha\Phi + 2\beta\Phi^2 + \cdots \\
383: H &=& 1 + 2\gamma\Phi + \frac{3}{2}\delta\Phi^2 + \cdots \\
384: \epsilon &=& 1 + \epsilon_1\Phi +\epsilon_2\Phi^2 + \cdots \\
385: \mu &=& 1 + \mu_1\Phi + \mu_2\Phi^2 + \cdots \quad .
386: \end{eqnarray}
387: By requiring that $\alpha=1$ we achieve that $T = 1-2\Phi$ to first order, so that the theory is in agreement
388: with Newtonian gravitation at lowest order. Now, the redshift predictions (\ref{th-red_P})-(\ref{th-red_H})
389: take the form
390: \begin{eqnarray}
391: z_P &=& (1-2\Gamma_0)\Phi+\left(\frac{3}{2}-\beta-\Gamma_P\right)\Phi^2 \\
392: z_F &=& (1-4\Gamma_0)\Phi+\left(\frac{3}{2}-\beta-\Gamma_F\right)\Phi^2 \\
393: z_H &=& (1-4\Gamma_0+\Upsilon_1)\Phi+\left(\frac{3}{2}-\beta-\Gamma_H\right)\Phi^2
394: \end{eqnarray}
395: where
396: \begin{eqnarray}
397: \Gamma_0 &=& 1+\gamma-\epsilon_1 \\
398: \Gamma_1 &=& \frac{3}{2}\delta-4\gamma^2-2\epsilon_2-2\beta+2\epsilon_1^2+\gamma\epsilon_1+\mu_1-5\gamma+
399: \epsilon_1-1 \\
400: \Upsilon_1 &=& 2(\gamma+1)-(\epsilon+\mu) \\
401: \Upsilon_2 &=& \frac{3}{2}\delta-2\beta+4(\gamma+1)-\epsilon_1\mu_1-(\epsilon_2+\mu_2)\\
402: \Gamma_P &=& \Gamma_1 + 3(\gamma+1)\Gamma_0-3\Gamma_0^2+\Gamma_0+\Upsilon_1 \\
403: \Gamma_F &=& 2\Gamma_P-4\Gamma_0^2 \\
404: \Gamma_H &=& 2\Gamma_P-4\Gamma_0^2 -\Upsilon_2+(2\gamma+1)\Upsilon_1+\Upsilon_1(4\Gamma_0-\Upsilon_1)
405: \end{eqnarray}
406:
407: \vspace{1cm}
408: \noindent The exact expression for the $\Gamma$'s and $\Upsilon$'s are different for different nonmetric
409: theories. In
410: metric theories of gravity, all $\Gamma$'s and $\Upsilon$'s vanish identically. In a further project we
411: would therefore like to derive the values of these parameters for metric-affine gravity and see how the
412: validity of this theories could be constrained by experiments. Since the possible measurable differences
413: in the predictions between universal gravitational redshift and those of nonmetric theories becomes more
414: pronounced the stronger the involved gravitational fields are, it is obvious to use redshift measurements
415: of solar spectral lines or of white dwarf lines for such tests. On the Sun Manganese lines show rich
416: hyperfine structure which could be used for setting strong limits on nonmetric theories of gravity.
417: Unfortunately in the case of white dwarfs these measurements are seriously complicated by extreme pressure
418: broadening which currently renders the signals of finestructure and hyperfine structures hardly detectable.
419:
420: A possible alternative could be provided by measurements of various redshifts under controlled laboratory
421: conditions. Measuring the energy levels of hydrogen in gravitational potentials different from those on the
422: earth's surface, for example onboard the International Space Station (ISS), give the chance of revealing
423: differences in the levels of hydrogen to those of standard textbooks. Since the relevant parameters which
424: could influence the measurements can be determined with high accuracy, the probability of detecting possible
425: deviations is not insignificant.
426:
427: \clearpage
428:
429: \section{Further ideas}
430: The consequences of the idea that gravitational birefringence might have an important impact on the
431: interpretation of astronomical polarimetric data are so far a rather unexplored topic. We have shown
432: that gravity-induced depolarization has the potential to bridge the gap between former AM-Her models and
433: observations and that it also might help to solve the puzzle of circular polarization from active
434: galactic nuclei. However, since we are involved in a relatively new area of research, many other systems
435: or issues in astrophysics may also be better understandable in terms of gravity-induced birefringence or could,
436: at least, provide strong upper limits on this effect. We therefore provide here two brief examples of such systems
437: which it might be worth to turn one's attention to and which we have not yet explored as deeply as the foregoing
438: topics in this chapter.
439:
440: \vspace{0.5cm}
441: \noindent {\bf Gravitational lensing:} In a gravitational lense system, light emitted by a distant astronomical
442: object is deflected by the gravitational field of a massive object (star, galaxy, cluster of galaxies) which
443: lies along the line of sight, allowing for multiple source images. Depending on the relative orientations
444: of source, lens and observer multiple source images correspond to different trajectories of the light around the
445: lense. Consequently, light rays of different images could have propagated through different gravitational
446: potentials, so that the polarizations of these images becomes different if gravitational birefingence is not
447: negligible, taking into account the time delay. A systematic survey of the polarization properties in
448: gravitational lens systems therefore not only has the potential for strong upper limits on this effect but also
449: for a direct detection of birefringence in principle.
450:
451:
452: \vspace{0.5cm}
453: \noindent {\bf Polarization rotation over cosmological distances:} We have already shown in this chapter that
454: gravity-induced birefringence might help to understand the polarization properties of active galactic nuclei.
455: Since many of these objects are at high redshifts, the polarization properties of light could therefore also
456: be altered by propagating over cosmological distances in a nonmetric background gravitational field.
457:
458: Recently, several authors claimed to have found a systematic rotation of the plane of polarization of light
459: emitted by distant radio galaxies\cite{clk80,hav75,nr97}. By measuring the angle $\theta(\lambda)$ between
460: a fixed reference direction in space and the plane of polarization of a radio wave of wavelength $\lambda$,
461: they found that their data could be fitted by
462: \begin{equation}
463: \theta(\lambda)=\alpha\lambda^2 + \chi \quad .
464: \end{equation}
465: The linear dependence of the angle $\theta$ on $\lambda^2$ is a characteristic feature of Faraday rotation. The
466: fitting parameter $\alpha$ depends upon the magnetic field and the electron density along the line of sight.
467: Therefore, the angle $\chi$ describes the orientation of the polarization plane after Faraday rotation is
468: taken out, i.e. the orientation of the plane before the rotation. Now, Nodland and Ralston \cite{nr97} claimed
469: that the observed $\chi$ angles could be reproduced by assuming that the polarization plane of a wave emitted
470: by a galaxy is initially oriented at a fixed angle relative to the galaxy's major axis, and then undergoes a
471: rotation, specified by an angle $\beta$, that depends on the direction of the galaxy in the sky. Defining
472: an angle $\gamma$ between the line of sight to the galaxy and a fixed direction is space they found
473: \begin{equation}
474: \beta=\frac{1}{2}\Lambda^{-1}r\cos\gamma \quad ,
475: \end{equation}
476: where $r$ is the distance to the galaxy and $\Lambda$ denotes a rotation measure. This dependency of $\beta$
477: on a fixed direction in space, provided by $\gamma$, is an indication of anisotropy. The importance of this effect
478: lies in the fact that it can probe the fundamental structure of space time at very early times and over length
479: scales commensurate with the size of the universe. Because of the clear importance that the confirmation of an
480: intrinsic anisotropy of space would have, much effort have been put into explaining these results. At least
481: three mechanisms have been proposed which can lead to this cosmological birefringence
482: \begin{itemize}
483: \item Modification of conventional electrodynamics by introducing pseudoscalar axion fields \cite{axion}.
484: \item Modified dispersive Maxwell equations due to semi-classical space time with polymer-like structure
485: at microscales in loop quantum gravity \cite{gam98}.
486: \item Rotation of the polarization plane due to a nonmetric gravitational background field.
487: \end{itemize}
488: The polarization rotation therefore serves as a test for alterations of various basic physical theories
489: which should be thoroughly studied to analyse the distinguishing features and measurable differences between
490: them with the hope of finding true modifications of fundamental physics. A high priority in this list of possible
491: alterations should be given to the coupling of torsion to electromagnetism which appears natural in the
492: framework of metric-affine gauge theories of gravity. The main advantage of this approach is that its predictions
493: are already testable and even perhaps verifiable in other, more accessible branches of astrophysics, as
494: was presented in this thesis.
495:
496: It is important to note that the importance of further tests of these different modifications is unaffected by the
497: current controversy over the correctness of the interpretation of the data \cite{carol,eb97,lfw97}.
498: Even if Nodland and Ralston \cite{nr97} could be proven wrong, these studies can be useful to uncover the source
499: of any polarization rotation effect in the future.
500:
501:
502:
503: