1: \chapter{Cataclysmic Variables}
2: The method which we have used up to now for setting strong upper limits on gravity-induced
3: birefringence is very limited. As mentioned before, this is mainly due to the lack of a reliable
4: atmospheric model for magnetic white dwarf stars which could provide realistic estimates for
5: the emitted degree of polarized radiation as a function of field strengths and opacities.
6:
7: In this chapter we circumvent this restriction by focussing our attention on magnetic
8: white dwarfs which are members in close interacting binary systems. These are systems where
9: two stars move around the common center-of-mass in a close orbit so that matter can fall along a
10: ballistic stream from one star to the other. An important subclass of these cataclysmic variables are
11: the AM-Her type binary systems where the white dwarf posses a strong magnetic field so that matter
12: is prevented from forming an accretion disc and, instead, impacts directly on the stellar surface near
13: the magnetic poles. During this process highly polarized cyclotron radiation is emitted whose rotational
14: modulation provides a unique opportunity not only for setting upper limits on gravity-induced
15: birefringence but perhaps also for the very first direct observation of this effect.
16:
17: We therefore begin this chapter with a brief introduction into the basic physics of close interacting
18: binary systems. The characteristics of the polarized radiation are determined by the various parameters
19: like the temperature structure and height of the shock front, formed when the accreting matter hits the
20: stellar surface, as well as by the electron number density of the heated plasma and the angular extend
21: of the emission region. A realistic estimate of the emitted degree of polarization therefore depends
22: heavily on the quality of the shock front model. With this underlying physical structure, the theory of
23: radiative transfer of polarized radiation in the case of cyclotron emission is reviewed. Although the
24: theory is well known for decades now, we add a new feature by modifying the resulting Stokes vector
25: when we allow for gravity-induced birefringence.
26:
27: Using this theoretical framework we present phase dependent light and polarization curves for the AM-Her
28: system VV Puppis which are compared with polarimetric data taken by Cropper \& Warner in 1986 \cite{cw86}.
29: Although the observed asymmetries are in agreement with our numerical curves, the flat topped character
30: seen in observations cannot be achieved numerically. However, by allowing for sufficiently strong
31: birefringence we obtain a good conformity with the observations.
32: \newpage
33:
34: \section{Basic model of interacting binaries}
35: Approximately $50 - 60$\% of all stars are assumed to be members of binary systems. By involving
36: nearly the whole spectrum of stars from red giants to black holes as possible binary components,
37: these systems often provide examples of astrophysical processes which are among the most exciting
38: currently known. From a more practical point of view the most precise mass determinations in
39: astronomy are available from binary systems where the period of revolution is precisely measurable
40: due to mutual occultations.
41:
42: The physics of binary systems depends of course on the masses of the involved stars and, more
43: importantly, on their spatial separation. If the distance between both components is big enough
44: so that they can interact at every evolutionary stage only gravitationally without any related
45: mass transfer, then each member of the binary will pass through its individual development without being
46: disturbed by its companion. An example for this is Sirius with the white dwarf Sirius B as the
47: second star. However, the situation becomes more interesting if the stars move so close to each
48: other that tidal effects are no longer negligible. In this chapter we are interested in such systems
49: which consist of a white dwarf as the primary component and an, evolutionary younger and more
50: massive, secondary component which can be represented by a main sequence or a red giant star.
51: If both stars are not too close, their initial spherical shapes becomes teardrop-shaped with the tip
52: pointing towards the companion. Basically a mass transfer stream between the components can now
53: be initialized in two ways, i.e. either by an evolutionary expansion of the secondary component
54: or by a continuous decrease of the distance between the stars. In both cases, the secondary component
55: begins to fill its Roche lobe (the volume surrounding an object within matter is gravitationally
56: bound to it) and matter is transfered to the primary component via the inner Lagrange point L1.
57: The mechanism of how exactly the distance between the stars could be further decreased is not fully
58: understood at the moment. One possibility is that they already originated in close proximity or that
59: due to friction of the surrounding material from both components the rotational energy of the system
60: was partially converted into internal energy.
61:
62: Once the mass transfer has started, the angular momentum of the system prevents
63: the stream from falling directly onto the white dwarf surface. Instead the material forms, in most
64: cases, an accretion disc where the gas slowly spirals inwards while, again by friction, the
65: gravitational energy is converted into thermal energy. Finally, the matter falls onto the white dwarf
66: from the inner edge of the disc. However, this is not a continuous process since the material is
67: mostly accumulated in the accretion disc until the disc becomes unstable and, then, is suddenly
68: deflated accompanied by a huge brightening of the disc due to conversion of gravitational to thermal
69: energy. Such an event is also known as a dwarf nova. Such close binary systems which interact by
70: means of a mass transfer stream are called {\em cataclysmic variables}.
71:
72: For our purpose, the most interesting among them are those where the white dwarf posseses a
73: ultrastrong magnetic field of the of the order $10 \lsim B \lsim 60$ megagauss (MG), which prevents
74: the formation of a normal accretion disc and leads, instead, to a well-defined accretion flow
75: from the secondary component to near the magnetic pole(s) of the white dwarf. These objects are
76: often called AM-Her systems, after the prototype AM-Herculi discovered in 1923.
77:
78: \newpage
79:
80: \begin{figure}[t]
81: \centerline{\psfig{figure=art-amher.ps,width=4.5in,height=5.5in}}
82: \caption{Artist impression of an Am-Her type system.}
83: \end{figure}
84:
85: \vspace*{1cm}
86: \noindent The name ''Polar'' for AM-Hers and related systems was introduced by Krzeminski \&
87: Serkowski in 1977 \cite{ks77} because of the strong and variable circular $(\sim 10\% - 30\% \,
88: \cite{cw86,tap77})$ and linear polarization which is typical for these objects. Certainly
89: this attribute makes the polars very appealing for utilizing them for possible measurements
90: of gravity-induced birefringence. Therefore, the next sections will give some insight into
91: the basic physical processes responsible for the emission of polarized radiation. This, in
92: turn provides the basis for a critical analysis of the observed polarization properties with respect to
93: gravity-induced birefringence.
94:
95: \clearpage
96:
97: \begin{figure}[t]
98: \centerline{\psfig{figure=am-her.eps,width=5.5in,height=3.5in}}
99: \caption{Schematic representation of the accretion pattern in AM Hers (adopted from
100: Wickramasinghe \& Ferrario \cite{wf00}).}
101: \label{amher-scheme}
102: \end{figure}
103:
104: \section{Mass transfer and shock models}
105: The basic model which has been developed for AM-Her type systems is briefly sketched in
106: Fig.\ref{amher-scheme}. It is mainly based on X-ray observations \cite{beu98}, modelling
107: of the continuum and emission-line radiation from magnetically confined accretion funnels
108: \cite{fw99}, and polarized emission from shocks \cite{fwi90}.
109:
110: For an ordinary, nonmagnetic primary component the matter streams from the secondary star and
111: accumulates in a disc before impacting on the white dwarf surface. On the other hand the detailed
112: accretion mechanisms are much more complicated and even controversial (e.g. \cite{liw97}) if
113: the primary component posseses a strong magnetic field. However, it is generally accepted that
114: after the material has left the companion star near the inner Lagrangian point, a stream is
115: formed which falls freely towards the white dwarf on a ballistic trajectory. If the magnetic field
116: of the accreting object is strong enough $(\gsim 1$MG) the increasing magnetic pressure will
117: begin to dominate the material flow at some distance from the white dwarf in a region called the
118: coupling region. Here, the radial velocity component is reduced and the flow aquires first
119: toroidal and then poloidal velocity components as the stream couples onto the field lines.
120: From that point the material falls again freely towards the accreting object in magnetically confined
121: funnels that connect the coupling region with the white dwarf surface. Finally a static shock
122: above one or both magnetic poles slows and heats the infalling material before it settles on the
123: surface with a temperature of $kT \approx 10$keV.
124: \subsection{The shock region}
125: The shock region can be regarded as the main source of emission in the optical and the X-ray wave
126: band. Calculations of the circular polarization light curve presented in this chapter are therefore
127: based on a sophisticated model of the emission region, first invented by Wickramasinghe \& Megitt
128: in 1985 \cite{wme85}.
129:
130: The first attempts to model the shock fronts of AM-Her type systems, given by Meggitt \&
131: Wickramasinghe in 1982 \cite{mew82}, were based on the assumptions of constant temperature
132: accretion columns. Although successful in explaining some of the gross properties
133: like the continuum energy distribution, this model, based on cyclotron opacity,
134: failed to predict the correct degree of polarization (the predicted values were a factor of
135: about 2-3 higher than observed). The model which is discussed here can be regarded as a further
136: development of this early model since it includes a temperature structure (shock front) as
137: well as free-free opacity as a pure absorption process.
138:
139: Assuming that the ionized material falls freely towards the magnetic poles, it moves a radial
140: distance $r$ with the velocity
141: \begin{equation}
142: V(r) = \left(\frac{2GM}{r}\right)^{1/2} = 5.2 \times 10^8\left(\frac{M}{M_{\odot}}\right)^{1/2}
143: \left(\frac{10^9 \mbox{\footnotesize{cm}}}{R}\right)\left(\frac{R}{r}\right)^{1/2}
144: \mbox{\footnotesize{cm}}\,s^{-1} \quad ,
145: \end{equation}
146: where $M$ and $R$ are the mass and the radius in (cm) of the white dwarf respectively. Before
147: the material settles down on the surface, the density is increased in a strong shock by a factor
148: 4 and the velocity decreases by the same factor across the shock front. In the case that this
149: shock is formed near the white dwarf surface, the shock temperature is given by
150: \begin{equation}
151: T_S = \frac{3\mu m_H GM}{8 kR} = 6\times 10^8 \mu\left(\frac{M}{M_{\odot}}\right)
152: \left(\frac{10^9 \mbox{\footnotesize{cm}}}{R}\right)\mbox{K} \quad ,
153: \end{equation}
154: where $\mu$ denotes the mean molecular weight. The postshock electron density is
155: \begin{equation}
156: N_e = 3.8 \times 10^{17}\left(\frac{F_s}{10^2\mbox{\footnotesize{g cm}}^{-2}s^{-1}}\right)
157: \left(\frac{M}{M_{\odot}}\right)^{-1/2}\left(\frac{R}{R_{\odot}}\right)^{1/2}
158: \mbox{\footnotesize{cm}}^{-3} \quad ,
159: \end{equation}
160: where $F_s$ is the specific accretion rate. In this context it is important to note that the scope
161: of this model only allows accretion within a small fraction of the stellar surface namely on
162: a point like structure. This restriction will later be removed by a more general approach
163: that also allows for more extended shock regions.
164:
165: The bulk of the translational energy is carried by the ions which achieve a Maxwellian velocity
166: distribution by ion-ion collisions at a distance $h_{\mbox{\tiny{ion}}}\sim V_{\mbox{\tiny{ion}}}
167: t_{\mbox{\tiny{ion}}}$, where $t_{\mbox{\tiny{ion}}}$ denotes the ion-ion collision time scale
168: \cite{mew84}, while the electrons are mainly heated by Coulomb collisions with the ions. The
169: electron temperature usually differs from the ion temperature and both vary with height in the
170: shock \cite{ima87,wuc90}. As the gas then settles on the stellar surface it is cooled by
171: bremsstrahlung and cyclotron radiation. In the case that cyclotron radiation dominates, the
172: electrons cool faster than they can be heated by collisions with ions, with the consequence that
173: ions and electrons have different temperatures, so that the gas in the ''two-fluid'' regime.
174: % Since the cyclotron opacity depends on the magnetic field $B_p$ and the electron number density
175: % $N_e$ it is useful to summarize this dependence in the scaling factor
176: % \begin{equation}
177: % s_0 = c\omega_c/\omega_p^2=1.657\times 10^8 B_p/N_e \mbox{\footnotesize{cm}}
178: %% \end{equation}
179: % where $\omega_c$ and $\omega_p$ are the cyclotron and the plasma frequency, respectively.
180: % Therefore, the optical depth parameter $\Lambda$ is given by
181: % \begin{equation}
182: % \Lambda(T,\omega/\omega_c,\theta) = 1/\kappa s_0 \quad .
183: % \end{equation}
184: % Here, $\kappa$ denotes the cyclotron opacity and $\theta$ the inclination angle between the
185: % line-of-sight and the magnetic field.
186: %
187: However, it is important to note that the accretion flow in AM-Her systems is not continuous.
188: Occasionally these systems drop to low states of reduced brightness which could be explained
189: by interruptions or reductions in the material stream. The reason for this accretion modulation
190: is not fully understood at the moment, but it may be related to solar-type magnetic activity
191: in connection with starspots of the secondary component \cite{hgm00}.
192: \subsection{Extended emission regions}
193: \begin{figure}[t]
194: \centerline{\psfig{figure=axes.eps,width=4.8in,height=3.5in}}
195: \caption{Orientation of the dipole axis $d$ and the spin axis $l_s$ relative to the symmetry axis
196: $l_p$ of the emission region and the line-of-sight.}
197: \label{axes}
198: \end{figure}
199: The idea that the emission regions are pointlike sources located at the diametrically opposite magnetic
200: poles is insufficient and often contradicted by observations. For example the asymmetries seen in
201: polarization light curves of most systems or the wavelength dependence of intensity and polarization in
202: AM-Her itself are hardly reproduced by these models. Therefore, Wickramasinghe \& Ferrario \cite{wf87,wf88}
203: introduced emission regions which extend across and above the stellar surface. Consequently, this
204: new concept allowed for field spread, density and temperature structure, and for displacement from
205: the magnetic poles.
206:
207: The field geometry is that of a centered dipole. Using a cartesian coordinate system, the spin axis
208: $l_s$ is inclined with respect to the line-of-sight by an angle $i$ in the $y-z$-plane, while the
209: symmetry axis of the emission region $l_p$ is identified with the positive $z$-axis making an angle
210: $\Delta$ with respect to the spin axis. The emission region itself extends over a spherical cap which
211: subtends an angle $2\alpha$ at the center of the star. In this coordinate system, the dipole axis has a
212: polar angle $\Theta_B$ with $l_p$ and an azimuthal angle $\Phi_B$ with respect to a line perpendicular
213: to $l_p$ in the same plane as $l_p$ and $l_s$. We can therefore identify this line with the (positive)
214: $y$-axis of the cartesian system in the direction $l_p\times(l_p \times l_s)$. The relative orientations
215: of the various axes are shown in Fig.\ref{axes}.
216:
217: For our purpose, the best agreement with observations was achieved by assuming uniform electron
218: temperature $T_e$ and fixed electron number density $N_e$. The emission region has a constant radial
219: thickness $H$ so that the characteristics of the emission region can be summarized by the optical depth
220: parameter
221: \begin{equation}
222: \Lambda_H = 2.01\times 10^8(H/10^8\mbox{\footnotesize{cm}})(N_e/10^{16}\mbox{\footnotesize{cm}}^{-3})
223: (3\times 10^7 G/B)
224: \end{equation}
225: in the radial direction \cite{wf88}. Of course $\Lambda_H$ varies over the emission region due to changes
226: in $B$. The magnetic field strength $B$ in the above expression is evaluated at the magnetic pole.
227: \section{Cyclotron radiation and birefringence}
228: Since the cyclotron emission is highly polarized, the AM-Her systems provide an exellent opportunity
229: to test for gravity-induced birefringence. For this purpose we have used a FORTRAN program,
230: written by D.T. Wickramasinghe which calculates the Stokes vector of cyclotron emission in the
231: 'point source' approximation of Wickramasinghe and Meggitt \cite{wme85} using a fixed electron
232: temperature $T_e$ and a fixed optical depth parameter $\Lambda$. This section will present the
233: underlying mathematical formalism with the additional new feature of a gravity-induced alteration
234: of the Stokes vector. Extended emission regions, introduced in the previous section, are easily
235: obtained from this concept as a homogeneous composite of pointlike sources.
236:
237: Consider an electron in helical motion in a uniform magnetic field directed along
238: the z-axis in a cartesian coordinate system. The energy emitted per unit
239: solid angle $\Omega$ making an angle $\theta$ with the magnetic field and per frequency
240: interval $d\omega$ is given by
241: \begin{equation}\label{cyc1}
242: \epsilon_0d\omega\,d\Omega=\frac{e^2\omega^2}{2\pi c}\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}F_n\delta_n(y)
243: \end{equation}
244: where $\epsilon_0$ is also the coefficient of spontaneous emission, with
245: \begin{equation}
246: F_n=(\cot\theta-\beta_{\|}\mbox{cosec}\,\theta)^2 J^2_n(n\xi)+\beta_{\perp}^2 J^{'2}_n(n\xi)
247: \end{equation}
248: where $J_n$ is the Bessel function of order $n$ and $J_n^{'}(n\xi)\equiv dJ_n(n\xi)/d(n\xi)$
249: \cite{bekefi}.
250: Further, $\beta_{\|}$ and $\beta_{\perp}$ are the parallel and perpendicular components of
251: the dimensionless velocity $\beta=v/c$, so that we define $\xi=\beta_{\perp}\sin\theta/(1-
252: \beta_{\|}\cos\theta)$. The argument of the $\delta$ function is
253: \begin{equation}
254: y = n\omega_c/\gamma-\omega(1-\beta_{\|}\cos\theta)
255: \end{equation}
256: where $\omega_c=eB/mc$ is the electron cyclotron frequency and $\gamma=(1-\beta^2)^{-1/2}$ the
257: usual Lorentz factor. From this one can easily see, that the radiation spectrum consists of
258: spectral lines occuring at frequencies
259: \begin{equation}
260: \omega = \frac{n\omega_c}{\gamma(1-\beta_{\|}\cos\theta)} \quad ,
261: \end{equation}
262: which also gives a relation between $\gamma$ and harmonic number $n$.
263:
264: In order to describe a uniform plasma with temperature $T$ and electron number density $N$,
265: one has to introduce a relativistic Maxwellian distribution in (\ref{cyc1}) and integrate over
266: $\beta_{\|}$
267: \begin{equation}\label{cfi}
268: \epsilon_I\,d\omega\,d\Omega=\frac{e^2\omega^2}{4\pi c}\frac{N\mu}{K_2(\mu)}\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}
269: \int_{-1}^1F_I\exp(-\mu\gamma)(\gamma^4/n\omega_c)d\beta_{\|}\,d\omega\,d\Omega
270: \end{equation}
271: where the dimensionless electron temperature $\mu=mc^2/kT$ serves as the argument of the modified
272: Bessel function of the second kind, $K_2(\mu)$.
273:
274: To obtain the emission coefficients $\epsilon_Q$ and $\epsilon_V$ for Stokes $Q$ and Stokes $V$,
275: one defines a coordinate system where the z-axis serves as the line-of-sight and the uniform
276: magnetic field lies in the x-z plane, making an angle $\theta$ with the z-axis. Then, the complex
277: Jones vector for the electric field of the radiation of a single electron is proportional to
278: (\cite{bekefi})
279: \begin{equation}
280: \left(
281: \begin{array}{c}
282: (\cot\theta-\beta_{\|}\mbox{cosec}\,\theta)J_n(n\xi)\\
283: -i\beta_{\perp} J^{'}_n(n\xi)\\
284: 0
285: \end{array}
286: \right)\quad .
287: \end{equation}
288: The emission coefficients $\epsilon_Q$ and $\epsilon_V$ for the Stokes parameters $Q$ and $V$ are
289: obtained by replacing $F_I$ in (\ref{cfi}) with
290: \begin{equation}
291: F_Q = (\cot\theta-\beta_{\|}\mbox{cosec}\,\theta)^2 J^2_n(n\xi)-\beta_{\perp}^2 J^{'2}_n(n\xi)
292: \end{equation}
293: and
294: \begin{equation}
295: F_V = -2(\cot\theta-\beta_{\|}\mbox{cosec}\,\theta)J_n(n\xi)\beta_{\perp} J^{'}_n(n\xi)
296: \end{equation}
297: respectively, while $\epsilon_U=0$. Since $0\leq \xi \leq 1$ the Bessel function $J_n$ and its
298: derivative can be replaced with the Wild-Hill approximations \cite{whill} which are more easy to
299: implement in a computer program
300: \begin{eqnarray}
301: J_n(n\xi) &\approx& \frac{\xi^n\exp(nw)}{\sqrt{2\pi n}(1+w)^n}[w^3+0.5033/n]^{-1/6} \\
302: J^{'}_n(n\xi)&\approx& \frac{\xi^{n-1}\exp(nw)}{\sqrt{2\pi n}(1+w)^n}[w^3+1.193/n]^{1/6}
303: [1-1/5n^{2/3}]
304: \end{eqnarray}
305: with $w=\sqrt{1-\xi^2}$. The cyclotron absorption coefficients are given by Kirchhoff's law,
306: since the electrons are in thermal equilibrium, i.e.
307: \begin{equation}
308: \epsilon_I = \kappa_{\mbox{\tiny{cyc}}} B_{\omega}, \quad \epsilon_Q = q_{\mbox{\tiny{cyc}}}
309: B_{\omega}, \quad \epsilon_V = v_{\mbox{\tiny{cyc}}} B_{\omega},
310: \end{equation}
311: with the Rayleigh-Jeans law
312: \begin{equation}
313: B_{\omega} = \omega^2 k T/4\pi^3 c^2 \quad .
314: \end{equation}
315: In contrast to the first model, given by Meggitt \& Wickramasinghe in 1982 \cite{mew82} the new
316: scheme also includes free-free opacity as a pure absorption process. The corresponding opacities
317: are
318: \begin{eqnarray}
319: \kappa_{\mbox{\tiny{ff}}} &=& \frac{\omega_p^2(2\omega^4+2\omega^2\omega_c^2-
320: 3\omega^2\omega_c^2\sin^2\theta+\omega_c^4\sin^2\theta)}
321: {2c\omega^2(\omega^2-\omega_c^2)^2}\,\nu_c \\
322: q_{\mbox{\tiny{ff}}} &=& \frac{\omega_p^2\omega_c^2\sin^2\theta(\omega_c^2-3\omega^2)}
323: {2c\omega^2(\omega^2-\omega_c^2)^2}\,\nu_c \\
324: u_{\mbox{\tiny{ff}}} &=& 0 \\
325: v_{\mbox{\tiny{ff}}} &=& \frac{2\omega_p^2\omega\omega_c\cos\theta}
326: {c\omega^2(\omega^2-\omega_c^2)^2}\,\nu_c
327: \end{eqnarray}
328: with the plasma frequency $\omega_p=(4\pi N_e e^2/m)^{1/2}$ and the approximately collision
329: frequency $\nu_c=3.63 N_e T^{-3/2}\ln(2.95\times 10^{11}T/\omega)$. It is assumed that the
330: opacity can be treated as a sum of cyclotron and free-free components, hence
331: \begin{eqnarray}
332: \kappa = \kappa_{\mbox{\tiny{cyc}}}+\kappa_{\mbox{\tiny{ff}}}, \quad
333: q = q_{\mbox{\tiny{cyc}}} + q_{\mbox{\tiny{ff}}}, \quad
334: v = v_{\mbox{\tiny{cyc}}} + v_{\mbox{\tiny{ff}}} \quad .
335: \end{eqnarray}
336: The transfer equation now becomes
337: \begin{equation}\label{tfr}
338: \frac{d}{ds}\left(\begin{array}{c}I\\Q\\U\\V\end{array}\right)=
339: \left(\begin{array}{c}\epsilon_I\\\epsilon_Q\\0\\\epsilon_V\end{array}\right)+
340: \left(\begin{array}{cccc}-\kappa&-q&0&-v\\-q&-\kappa&-f&0\\0&f&-\kappa&-h\\
341: -v&0&h&-\kappa\end{array}\right)
342: \left(\begin{array}{c}I\\Q\\U\\V\end{array}\right)
343: \end{equation}
344: with the Faraday mixing coefficients
345: \begin{eqnarray}
346: f &=& (\omega_p^2/c\omega_c)\cos\theta/(\omega^2/\omega^2_c-1) \\
347: h &=& (\omega_p^2/c\omega_c)\sin^2\theta/2(\omega^3/\omega^3_c-\omega/\omega_c) \quad .
348: \end{eqnarray}
349: For uniform conditions these coefficients are constant along a ray. In order to solve the
350: transfer equation (\ref{tfr}) set
351: \begin{eqnarray}
352: m &=& 0.5(f^2+h^2), \, n = 0.5(q^2+v^2), \, p = qf-vh, \, r=qh+vf, \\
353: R &=& [(m+n)^2-p^2]^{1/2}, \, a_1 = (m+n+R)/p, \, a_3 = 1/a_1, \\
354: \lambda &=& (n-m+R)^{1/2}, \, \mu = (m-n+R)^{1/2}, \\
355: b_1 &=& (f-qa_1)/\lambda, \, b_3 = (f-qa_3)/\mu \\
356: c_1 &=& -(h+va_1)/\lambda, \, c_3 = -(h+va_3)/\mu \quad .
357: \end{eqnarray}
358: Setting all intensities equal to zero at $s=0$, the Stokes parameters of the radiation after
359: passing through a distance $s$ are (see \cite{mew82})
360: \begin{eqnarray}
361: I/B_{\omega} &=& 1-(p/2R)(a_1\cosh \lambda s - a_3\cos\mu s)\exp(-\kappa s) , \label{icyc}\\
362: Q/B_{\omega} &=& -(p/2R)(b_1\sinh\lambda s - b_3\sin\mu s )\exp(-\kappa s) , \\
363: U/B_{\omega} &=& (p/2R)(\cosh \lambda s - \cos\mu s)\exp(-\kappa s) , \label{ucyc}\\
364: V/B_{\omega} &=& -(p/2R)(c_1\sinh\lambda s - c_3\sin\mu s)\exp(-\kappa s) \label{vcyc}\quad .
365: \end{eqnarray}
366: The question of how gravitational birefringence could be implemented in this scheme depends
367: heavily on the shock height above the stellar surface where the polarized radiation is emitted.
368: Since the phase shift $\Delta\Phi$ in (\ref{mag-form}) is proportional to $1/R$ where $R$ denotes
369: the radial distance from the stellar center, an emission region which is extended of approximately
370: one stellar radius above the surface would require an integration process along the shock height
371: where a gravitationally modified transfer equation has to be solved for each plane parallel slab.
372: An upper limit on the shock height is given in the 'single-fluid' approximation when bremsstrahlung
373: is the dominating cooling mechanism. In this case the height $h_{\mbox{\tiny{br}}}$ is simply
374: proportional to the product between the free-fall velocity $V_{\mbox{\tiny{ff}}}$ (the index 'ff',
375: of course, must not be confused with the index for free-free absorption) and the specific cooling
376: time $t_{\mbox{\tiny{ff}}}$ for electrons due to bremsstrahlung. The explicit expression for
377: $h_{\mbox{\tiny{br}}}$, given by Wickramasinghe \& Ferrario \cite{wf00} is
378: \begin{equation}
379: h_{\mbox{\tiny{br}}}=9.6\times 10^7\left(\frac{10^{16}\mbox{\footnotesize{cm}}^{-3}}{N_e}\right)
380: \left(\frac{M}{M_{\odot}}\right)\left(\frac{10^9\mbox{\footnotesize{cm}}}{R}\right)\,
381: \mbox{\footnotesize{cm}} \quad .
382: \end{equation}
383: Assuming a white dwarf mass of $M_{\odot}$ with a corresponding radius of $0.014\, R_{\odot}$
384: this yields a height of $\sim 10^8$cm with $N_e=10^{15}$. Since we focus on a 'two-fluid' model
385: when the electrons are cooled by cyclotron radiation, this means that we have for the cooling time
386: $t_{\mbox{\tiny{cyc}}} \ll t_{\mbox{\tiny{ff}}}$ and, therefore, $h_{\mbox{\tiny{cyc}}} \ll
387: h_{\mbox{\tiny{br}}}$. For this reason it is justified to view the polarization as emitted from
388: near the surface because $h_{\mbox{\tiny{cyc}}} \ll 10^2$km is certainly a sufficient upper limit.
389: We can therefore assume that birefringence acts directly on (\ref{ucyc}) and (\ref{vcyc})
390: according to
391: \begin{equation}
392: \left(\begin{array}{c}U_{\mbox{\tiny{grav}}}\\V_{\mbox{\tiny{grav}}}\end{array}\right)=
393: \left(\begin{array}{cc}\cos\Delta\Phi & 0 \\ 0 & \cos\Delta\Phi\end{array}\right)
394: \left(\begin{array}{c}U_{\mbox{\tiny{cyc}}}\\V_{\mbox{\tiny{cyc}}}\end{array}\right) \quad .
395: \end{equation}
396: Our objective is to include birefringence given by these equations in the calculations of synthetic
397: polarization light curves from AM-Her type systems. In this way we can set sharp upper limits
398: on this effect with a new method, independent from techniques presented in chapter two.
399: \section{Polarimetry of VV Puppis}
400: VV Puppis serves as a key system for our purpose of either detecting weak gravitational birefringence or
401: setting strong upper limits on it by means of gravitationally modified polarization curves. We therefore
402: present here some of the most important results that have been achieved for this system within the
403: last decades and which provide the basis for the subsequent analysis.
404:
405: VV Puppis was discovered in 1931 by van Gent \cite{gent} as a faint $(V = 14.5-18)$ variable with
406: a period of 100 min. Sinusoidal variations in radial velocity of the H and He II line, correlated
407: with the 100 min photometric variation led Herbig in 1960 to the conclusion that the observations
408: could best be explained by means of a binary system where the emission lines originate on the brighter
409: (primary) component \cite{herb}. Herbig also concluded that changes in the shape of the light curve
410: could have its origin in variations of the emission area on the visible stellar surface which can be
411: realized by self eclipses of the relevant area due to rotation. This picture was refined in 1977 by
412: Tapia's discovery of strong linear and circular polarization with a maximum of $\sim 16$\%\cite{tap77a}
413: in each polarization state of the optical light curve, confirming the suggestion by Bond and Wagner
414: (IAUC 3049) that this object is similar to the ''original'' AM-Her system. Two years later,
415: Visvanathan and Wickramasinghe identified a series of absorption features in the spectrum with
416: the 6th, 7th and 8th harmonics of cyclotron absorption in a nearly uniform magnetic field of
417: $\sim 3\cdot 10^7$G. This discovery renewed the general interest in astrophysical cyclotron emission
418: models, since it was the first detection of resolvable cyclotron harmonics in the optical spectrum
419: of a stellar object. However, these results had an uncertainty of one harmonic in the identification
420: since the observed features did not have well defined cores. As a consequence the corresponding
421: uncertainty in $B$ was $\sim 20$\%. Concerning the visibility of cyclotron harmonics, numerical
422: computations, based on the calculations presented in section 4.3 revealed that very special conditions
423: are required to produce consistency with the observed spectrum \cite{wf87}.
424: \begin{figure}[t]
425: \centerline{\psfig{figure=vv-pup.ps,width=5.5in,height=5.in}}
426: \caption{Intensity and polarization light curves of VV Puppis. From: Copper \& Warner (1986) \cite{cw86}.}
427: \label{pol-curv}
428: \end{figure}
429: For the shock front model related to VV Puppis one can therefore conclude a viewing angle
430: $i \sim 70^{\circ} - 90^{\circ}$ with respect to the magnetic field, low optical depths
431: $\Lambda \sim 10^5$ and high temperatures of $T \sim 10$ keV in a magnetic field of $\sim 3\cdot 10^7$G.
432: The fact that VV Puppis is the only stellar object to show resolvable cyclotron harmonics in its
433: optical spectrum is difficult to explain, although it might be possible that magnetic field broadening
434: often renders the features undetectable \cite{wf87}.
435: \begin{figure}[t]
436: \centerline{\psfig{figure=vvpup-phases.ps,width=7in,height=3.3in}}
437: \centerline{\psfig{figure=cbar.ps,width=4in,height=0.5in,angle=90}}
438: \caption{Visualization of the longitudinal magnetic field components of VV-Puppis during successive
439: rotational phases. The black spot which is visible from $\phi\approx 0.75$ to $\phi\approx 1.25$
440: markes the position of an emission region with size $\alpha = 10^{\circ}$ and displacements
441: $\Phi_B=90^{\circ}$, $\Theta_B=30^{\circ}$ from the dipolar axis.}
442: \label{vphases}
443: \end{figure}
444:
445: Fig.\ref{pol-curv} shows phase dependend, wavelength averaged polarization curves of VV Puppis from
446: Cropper \& Warner (1986) \cite{cw86}. As one can see, the light curves are strongly modulated at the
447: orbital period and the accreting pole is visible only for $\sim 40$\% of the period. A common feature is
448: the slow rise after eclipse egress and a more rapid decline before eclipse ingress. Although linear
449: polarization is present during the entire bright phase, with a second, lower peak at phase 0.7, the
450: strong linear polarization peak of $\sim 9$\% is expected to be caused by a magnetic field
451: configuration that can be seen only briefly at a viewing angle of $\sim 90^{\circ}$ with respect to
452: the line-of-sight. In this case linear polarization due to cyclotron radiation is strongest and would
453: therefore explain the observed feature. The circular polarization reaches a maximum value of $\sim 10$\%
454: during the bright phase after a more gradual rise. The steeper descent of the circular polarization is
455: followed by a sign reversal and a short dip, lasting 0.05 of a cycle. One of the most important results
456: is that VV Puppis shows steady negative circular polarization throughout the entire eclipse phase, which
457: could be explained by accretion onto a second region of the white dwarf \cite{ls79}, that is visible at
458: all rotation phases \cite{wfb89}. However, the negative polarization dip at eclipse ingress is probably
459: related to the shape of the primary accretion region. This conjection is supported by synthetic light
460: curves of only one accretion region as we will later show.
461:
462: On the basis of the light curves in Fig.\ref{pol-curv}, Cropper \& Warner reported for the system
463: geometry an inclination of $i = 77^{\circ}\pm 7^{\circ}$ and a magnetic colatitude of
464: $\Delta = 155^{\circ}\pm 6^{\circ}$. In 1987 Wickramasinghe \& Ferrario used $i=75^{\circ}$ and
465: $\delta=150^{\circ}$ for the calculation of phase dependent light curves of a displaced accreting pole.
466: Fig.\ref{vphases} shows a visualization of the longitudinal magnetic field component during a rotation
467: cycle of VV Puppis. The emission region with size $\alpha = 10^{\circ}$ has an azimuthal and polar
468: angle of $\Phi_B=90^{\circ}$ and $\Theta_B=30^{\circ}$, respectively, marked by the black spot.
469: One can see that in this configuration the emission region merely grazes the limb during the
470: bright phase, which is extraordinarily useful for our purpose, since gravitational birefringence
471: is most pronounced for sources located at the stellar limb. Further, the asymmetry in the
472: linear pulse and the sign reversal in circular polarization, prior to eclipse ingress can now
473: be explained by means of the system geometry. Calculating the angles $\theta$ between the field
474: directions in the spot and the line-of-sight one finds, that the angles are mostly greater than
475: $90^{\circ}$ at eclipse ingress and mostly less than $90^{\circ}$ at eclipse egress. The observed
476: reversal in the sign of circular polarization occurs just shortly before eclipse ingress when
477: $\theta > 90^{\circ}$ while the stronger linear pulse as well as the maximum intensity occurs at
478: $\theta \approx 90^{\circ}$ as expected from the beaming properties of cyclotron radiation.
479:
480: \subsection{Gravitationally modified lightcurves}
481: The programm which we have developed for calculations of gravitationally modified polarization curves
482: is based on a FORTRAN routine written by D.T. Wickramasinghe which calculates cyclotron emission in
483: the ''point source'' approximation of Wickramasinghe \& Meggitt \cite{wme85} for fixed optical depth
484: parameter $\Lambda$ and fixed electron temperature. Since the point source approximation is insufficient
485: to account for most of the observed polarization curve characteristics as explained in section 4.2.2,
486: our code describes an extended emission region as a composition of $\sim 3\times 10^2$ point sources,
487: depending on the size of the emission region. This emission region is placed on a rotating sphere
488: according to the coordinate system described in sect. 4.2.2, so that the polarization values (circular
489: and linear) taken at each rotational phase yields the final polarization curve.
490:
491: We first present light curves without gravitational modification in order to have a comparison to the
492: observed curves of Cropper \& Warner \cite{cw86}.
493: Fig.\ref{vvp-circ1} shows the phase dependent polarization and light curves for two different models.
494: While both models have the same inclination $i=75^{\circ}$ and magnetic colatitude $\Delta=150^{\circ}$
495: for the position of the spot, the left column shows the curves for polar cap size $\alpha=5^{\circ}$
496: and a dipole axis orientation with $\theta_B=10^{\circ}$ and $\Phi_B=90^{\circ}$. The curves in the
497: right column have $\alpha=10^{\circ}$, $\theta_B=30^{\circ}$ and $\Phi_B=90^{\circ}$. We take note that
498: these curves are in good agreement with the curves presented by Wickramasinghe \& Ferrario in 1988
499: \cite{wf88} (hereafter WF88) for extended emission regions using similar parameters. At this point it
500: is important to note, that these curves (including those in WF88 \cite{dayal}) require an additional constant
501: background of unpolarised light in order to reproduce observations at least approximately. This constant,
502: unpolarized continuum probably comes from a component of the binary system which is always visible, like
503: the accretion stream, white dwarf photosphere or something similar - up to now the genuine origin is
504: unknown as well as how to correctly estimate it. Currently the only restriction is placed by the observed
505: polarization levels and, so, the continuum has to be introduced by hand to get the observed levels right.
506:
507: Since our code only allows for emission from one pole, the circular polarization curve does not show
508: a constant negative polarization throughout the hole period which is seen in the observations.
509: Basic characteristics like the asymmetry in the linear pulse and the negative dip in circular
510: polarization prior to eclipse ingress stand comparison to what is observed by Cropper \& Warner.
511: Nevertheless we note that the observations shows a more gradual rise in intensity and polarization
512: whereas the rapid declines are in agreement with our models.
513:
514: These ''pure'' curves (without any birefringence influence) could possibly better fit\-ted to observations
515: by a different geometrical shape of the emission region. While the present curves are based on a cylindrical
516: symmetric source, a more elongated, arc-like structure could perhaps account for the observed gradual rise.
517: Observational hints for arc-like emission regions has been presented by Beuermann et al. in 1987 \cite{beu87}
518: and also by Cropper \cite{crp87}. We will come to this point again after the discussion of the gravitationally
519: modified polarization curves. In accordance with WF88 we emphasize that the characteristics of the
520: polarization curves depend sensitively on $\Phi_B$ for a given $\alpha$ and $\theta_B$. For instance, for
521: $\Phi_B=0^{\circ}$ we obtain no polarization reversals while for $\Phi_B=180^{\circ}$ we observed two
522: symmetrical reversals at eclipse ingress and eclipse egress.
523: \clearpage
524: \begin{figure}[h]
525: \centerline{\psfig{figure=vvp-int-e5.eps,width=3.08in,height=2.64in}
526: \psfig{figure=vvp-int-e10.eps,width=3.08in,height=2.64in}}
527: \centerline{\psfig{figure=vvp-lin-e5.eps,width=3.08in,height=2.64in}
528: \psfig{figure=vvp-lin-e10.eps,width=3.08in,height=2.64in}}
529: \centerline{\psfig{figure=vvp-circ-e5.eps,width=3.08in,height=2.64in}
530: \psfig{figure=vvp-circ-e10.eps,width=3.08in,height=2.64in}}
531: \caption{Phase dependent circular polarization curve of VV Puppis for an emission region centered at
532: latitude $\Delta=150^{\circ}$. The orbital inclination is $i=75^{\circ}$ and
533: $\omega/\omega_c = 6.2$. The curves in the left column correspond to $\alpha=5^{\circ}$ and
534: $\theta_B=10^{\circ},\,\Phi_B=90^{\circ}$, while the right column corresponds to
535: $\alpha=10^{\circ}$ and $\theta_B=30^{\circ},\,\Phi_B=90^{\circ}$.}
536: \label{vvp-circ1}
537: \end{figure}
538: \clearpage
539: One of the main problems that these curves and also the curves presented by WF88 have is the
540: sinusoidal form of the circular polarization and intensity, in contrast to what is observed.
541: For this reason it is certainly interesting to see how gravity-induced birefringence modifies
542: the circular polarization curve. Fig.\ref{gcurve-circ} on the next page shows the phase dependent
543: circular polarization using the same system parameters as in Fig.\ref{vvp-circ1} and
544: $M_{\star}=0.4\,M_{\odot}$, $R_{\star}=0.014\,R_{\odot}$ but this time additionally with
545: increasing values of the metric-affine coupling constant $k$. As expected, for $k^2=0$ the curves
546: are identical with the unmodified polarization regime while for a sufficiently big $k^2$, the light
547: is almost completely depolarized. In between these two ''boundary'' states, one can adjust $k^2$ to a
548: value $(0.13\,\mbox{km})^2 \leq k^2 \leq (0.14\,\mbox{km})^2$ so that the circular polarization curve
549: is nearly flatten as seen in observations. At the same time, the negative dip which arises
550: prior to eclipse ingress is only marginally influenced by birefringence, although it but also decreases
551: somewhat with increasing $k^2$.
552:
553: In order to see if this range for $k^2$ is in agreement with upper limits, derived with the methods
554: of the chapter 3, we have made two consistency checks. By using the oblique dipolar rotator
555: technique we got an upper limit of $k^2_{VV\,Pup} \leq (0.35\, \mbox{km})$ for VV Puppis without limb darkening
556: and $k^2_{VV\,Pup} \leq (0.42\, \mbox{km})$ with maximum limb darkening and an observed polarization level of 10\%.
557: These limits are similar to those of 40 Eridani B from the previous chapter, i.e. $k^2_{40\, Eri\,B} \leq (0.35\,
558: \mbox{km})$ and $k^2_{40\, Eri\,B} \leq (0.44\, \mbox{km})$, respectively with $M_{40\, Eri\,B}=0.5 M_{\odot}$ and
559: $R_{40\, Eri\,B}=0.0136\,R_{\odot}$ comparable to $M_{VV\,Pup}=0.4M_{\odot}$ and $R_{VV\,Pup}=0.014\,R_{\odot}$.
560: The other white dwarfs of chapter 3 have higher masses and/or smaller radii so that their upper values
561: on $k^2$ are correspondingly lower. The same is true for the $k^2$ value of the sun.
562: However, one has to note that this dipolar rotator technique assumes that the emitted degree of
563: polarization is direct proportional to the longitudinal magnetic field strength, whereas we have seen
564: that this relation becomes much more complicate in the case of cyclotron radiation. It is therefore
565: more reliable to use the ''plain'' model proposed by Solanki, Haugan and Mann in 1999 \cite{shm99} which
566: assumes that the polarized radiation is emitted
567: homogeneously over the visible stellar surface. Since this is a rather conservative restriction
568: the resulting upper limit is congruously $k^2 \leq (0.4\, \mbox{km})^2$. Nevertheless
569: it is important that the range of $k^2$-values for VV Puppis is consistent with the limits from
570: the dipolar rotator model as well as with the plain model.
571:
572: Since the amount of Stokes $U$ in the linear polarization signal is always $\lsim 5$\% the linear
573: polarization curve is hardly affected by gravity-induced birefringence which only acts on Stokes $V$ and
574: Stokes $U$ as one can see in Fig.\ref{gcurve-lin}. Nevertheless, the first smaller peak becomes sharper
575: and more pronounced for $\alpha=5^{\circ}$ while for $\alpha=10^{\circ}$ the peak is washed out.
576: \clearpage
577:
578: \begin{figure}[t]
579: \centerline{\psfig{figure=gcurve-c05.eps,width=4.in,height=3.5in}}
580: \centerline{\psfig{figure=gcurve-c10.eps,width=4.in,height=3.5in}}
581: \caption{Gravitationally modified, phase dependent cicular polarization curves. The physical parameters
582: are the same as in Fig.\ref{vvp-circ1}. Upper curves: $\alpha=5^{\circ}$, $\theta_B=10^{\circ},\,
583: \Phi_B=90^{\circ}$. Lower curves: $\alpha=10^{\circ}$, $\theta_B=30^{\circ},\,\Phi_B=90^{\circ}$.}
584: \label{gcurve-circ}
585: \end{figure}
586:
587: \clearpage
588:
589: \begin{figure}[t]
590: \centerline{\psfig{figure=vvp-gcurve5-lin.eps,width=4.in,height=3.5in}}
591: \centerline{\psfig{figure=vvp-gcurve10-lin.eps,width=4.in,height=3.5in}}
592: \caption{Gravitationally modified, phase dependent linear polarization curves. The physical parameters
593: are the same as in Fig.\ref{vvp-circ1}. For comparison the same $k$-values as for circular polarization
594: have been plotted. Upper curves: $\alpha=5^{\circ}$, $\theta_B=10^{\circ},\,\Phi_B=90^{\circ}$.
595: Lower curves: $\alpha=10^{\circ}$, $\theta_B=30^{\circ},\,\Phi_B=90^{\circ}$.}
596: \label{gcurve-lin}
597: \end{figure}
598:
599: \clearpage
600: \section{Comparison of the results}
601: Finally, we want to check how the limits on $k^2$ for VV-Puppis, obtained by lightcurve fitting and
602: the polarization modelling technique from chapter 3 fit into the empirical scheme, given by (\ref{k-phi}).
603: For this purpose, Fig. \ref{poutII} shows again the curve from Fig. \ref{pout} additionally with the
604: $k^2_{VV\, Pup}$ values, obtained in this chapter.
605: \begin{figure}[h]
606: \centerline{\psfig{figure=poutII.eps,width=4.5in,height=4.5in}}
607: \caption{$k^2(\Phi)$ curve of chapter 3 together with the VV Puppis limits. The upper star $(0.6|0.385)$
608: marks the limit obtained by the polarization modelling technique. The lower star $(0.6|0.15)$ marks the
609: limit from lightcurve fitting. A better fit to the VV Puppis value is provided by the dashed curve.}
610: \label{poutII}
611: \end{figure}
612: The limit which is obtained by the polarization modelling technique deviates slightly from the curve.
613: Nevertheless the fitting can be improved with a minimally different function
614: \begin{equation}\label{k-phiII}
615: k^2(\Phi) = 1,026262\cdot (\exp(-\Phi^{1.1})+0.1\,\Phi^{-0.18}) \quad ,
616: \end{equation}
617: which yields the dashed line in the above figure. The bigger deviation of the lower point $(0.6|0.15)$ from
618: the curve is not surprising, since its intention is not to serve as an upper but as a lower limit on $k^2$.
619: Certainly more datapoints measured at different celestial bodies are needed to see which curve can best
620: approximate the upper limits on $k^2$.
621:
622: \clearpage
623: \section{Conclusions}
624: The main difference between the results of this chapter and those of chapter 3 is obvious. While for
625: ''ordinary'' magnetic white dwarfs we merely set upper limits on $k^2$ we now additionally have to
626: assume a lower bound on $k^2$ in order to link the presented theory of cyclotron radiation in AM-Her type
627: systems with observations. However one has to be very careful when making an interpretation of these
628: results since the underlying model of interacting binary systems is afflicted by many uncertainties:
629: \begin{enumerate}
630: \item The fact that a constant unpolarized continuum background has to be introduced by hand to
631: reproduce observations is unsatisfactory. A certain aspect of the physics of binary systems is
632: therefore probably not understood and although it is rather unlikely that this aspect could
633: lead to a modification of the present lightcurves similar to the gravitationally modified
634: curves, it cannot be completely ruled out.
635: \item More importantly, Wickramasinghe \& Ferrario \cite{wf90} have shown that an arc-shaped emission
636: region is also able to replace the sinusoidal shape seen in the circular polarization curve by a
637: flat top.
638: \end{enumerate}
639: At a first glance, the second point seems to discard any claim for a lower bound on $k^2$. Indeed,
640: we are here confronted with two alternative models which try to explain the same observed polarization
641: properties with different approaches. Currently there is no reliable and convincing possibility to judge
642: in favour of one or the other approach. Although the agreement of the conventional approach with observations
643: seems to be very appealing, the new question which now arises is, if the assumption of an arc-shaped emission
644: region for VV-Puppis is justified any longer, taking into account the new results from gravitational
645: birefringence. One of the main arguments supporting the arc-shaped emission regions is the flat top character
646: of the calculated circular polarization curve as well as the correctly predicted degree of polarization -
647: both also provided by gravity-induced depolarization. Concerning future projects it is therefore highly
648: desirable to look for specific predictions of the conventional model which do not involve polarized radiation
649: and are, as a result, not affected by birefringence.
650:
651: However, as an important conclusion of this chapter we can say that, as long as gravitational birefringence
652: cannot be excluded, the interpretation of polarized radiation from compact astrophysical objects is always
653: afflicted with many uncertainties since the real nongravitational source properties may be hidden behind a
654: birefringent curtain.
655:
656:
657:
658:
659: % So, basically we are confronted with two possibilities: In the first place, the underlying model of
660: % cyclotron emission which produces the curves in Fig.\ref{vvp-circ1} may be wrong or, at least, uncomplete
661: % so that the subsequent birefringence analysis is meaningless. For instance one has to check if the curves
662: % could be better fitted by dropping the basic assumption of a cylindrical emission region in favour of a
663: % more arc-like structure. Furthermore, the recent evidence for a second accreting pole \cite{wfb89} has
664: % introduced a further complication which also must be considered in interpreting the polarization data.
665: % However, the fact that the polar cap model is able to reproduce the observed asymmetries at least
666: % qualitatively suggests that it is likely not too far away from reality. Nonetheless, much work on this
667: % subject still has to be done.
668: %
669: % Secondly it is of course possible that the basic tenets of the polar cap model are indeed correct and
670: % depolarization plays an important role in understanding the polarization properties of AM-Her type systems.
671: % In the light of the consequences that a confirmation of a lower limit on $k^2$ would have it is therefore
672: % important to look for possible conventional depolarization mechanisms that could lead to results similar to
673: % Fig.\ref{gcurve}. Such a mechanism must be somehow related to the source properties itself, since the amount
674: % of depolarisation is strongly correlated with rotational phase as one can see in the figures. The currently
675: % only known candiate for this is Faraday depolarization although this mechanism is already taken into account
676: % in the radiative tranfer equation of sec. 4.3. A critical reanalysis of this point is therefore needed.
677:
678:
679:
680:
681:
682:
683:
684: