1: \chapter{Magnetic White Dwarfs}
2:
3: \vspace*{1cm}
4: The conjecture that gravity-induced birefringence is most distinctive for high
5: gravitational potentials suggests itself from the structure of the phase shift
6: formulas in NGT and MAG. For this reason the next logical step in this work
7: is to continue the analysis with suitable, compact objects like magnetic white
8: dwarfs. These stars provide a versatile tool for testing predictions of nonmetric
9: theories of gravity because of their Megagauss magnetic fields and high surface
10: gravity. Currently 65 or $\sim 5$\% of all known white dwarfs are classified
11: as isolated magnetic stars with field strengths in the range $ 3 \times 10^4 -
12: 10^9$G with the field strength distribution peaking at $1.6 \times 10^7$G \cite{wf00}.
13:
14: However, within this small class only a fraction of stars is of interest for
15: our purpose. In addition to wavelength resolved polarimetric data we also need
16: information about the mass and the radius of an object as well as
17: measurements of the magnetic field structure to set strong limits on gravitational
18: birefringence. With these restrictions we are left with just four magnetic
19: white dwarfs which display high levels of circular polarization between 8 and
20: 22 percent: Grw $+70^{\circ}8247$, REJ0317-853, PG2329+267 and 40 Eridani B.
21: The degree of circularly polarized light of wavelength $\lambda$,
22: $(V/F)_{\mbox{\footnotesize{obs}}}$, reaching the observer from any of these
23: stars is to first order simply a function of the strength of the local longitudinal
24: magnetic field \cite{aw89} and the coupling constant $k^2$.
25: Since gravitation theories based on a metric-affine geometry of space-time predict
26: a depolarization of light emitted from extended astrophysical sources we have looked
27: for the largest $k^2$ that predicts values of $(V/F)_{\mbox{\footnotesize{obs}}}$
28: larger than or equal to that observed. This sets an upper limit on $k$.
29: In the case of Grw $+70^{\circ}8247$ such a limit was already set by Solanki et al.\cite{shm99}
30: based on NGT predictions. We redo the analysis using both an improved model of the
31: magnetic field distribution of the star, as well as the predictions of metric affine
32: theory, which had not been predicted earlier.
33:
34:
35: However, we encounter a self-consistency problem since the relevant
36: source properties like masses, inclination angles, etc. we use have been determined with
37: models which, of course, neglect the possible influence of birefringence and, so, need
38: not be valid. We circumvent this problem by assuming worst-case properties of the source
39: that minimize depolarization caused by gravity-induced birefringence.
40:
41:
42: \newpage
43:
44: \section{Polarization Modelling Technique}
45: The search for a possible influence of gravity-induced birefringence on
46: astronomical signals, i.e. the modelling technique which is used to set
47: strong upper limits, depends of course heavily on the amount of appropiate
48: information that we can gain on the source of polarized radiation.
49: This becomes decisively clear in the transition from the techniques which
50: we have used to evaluate the solar observations of the last chapter to
51: the magnetic white dwarfs. Here, a crucial point is basically played by
52: the spatial resolution of the observations, since the individual calculation
53: of the phase shift $\Delta\Phi$ as a function of $\mu$ for a given light
54: source requires, at least theoretically, an infinite resolution of the source.
55:
56: So, due to the finite spatial resolution of observations, the effect the
57: phase shift has on a light ray depends on whether one observes a pointlike
58: source, e.g. small sunspots, or an extended source like white dwarf
59: magnetospheres. In the case of a pointlike source, all light received
60: from it suffers the same phase shift $\Delta \Phi(\mu_p)$. Introducing
61: Stokes parameters to describe polarized light, with Stokes $Q$ defined
62: to represent the difference between linear polarization parallel and
63: perpendicular to the part of the stellar limb closest to the source, one
64: therefore finds a crosstalk between Stokes $U$ and Stokes $V$. This crosstalk
65: is such that although the observed values $U_{\obs}$ and $V_{\obs}$ differ
66: from the values emitted by the source, $U_{\src}$ and $V_{\src}$, the
67: composite degrees of polarization remains equal: $(U_{\obs}^2 + V_{\obs}^2)
68: ^{1/2} = (U_{\src}^2 + V_{\src}^2)^{1/2}$. If an extended source covering
69: a range of $\mu$ values is observed then light emitted from different
70: points suffers different phase shifts and, so, adds up to an incoherent
71: superposition. Summing over the different contributions, using the
72: additive properties of Stokes parameters yields a reduction of the
73: observed polarization relative to the light emitted from the source:
74: $(U_{\obs}^2 + V_{\obs}^2)^{1/2} < (U_{\src}^2 + V_{\src}^2)^{1/2}$.
75: Since the stellar sources of polarization we consider in this chapter
76: are spatially extended, any observed (nonzero) degree of polarization
77: provides a limit on the strength of gravity-induced birefringence that
78: the star's gravitational field could induce.
79:
80: It is generally agreed that the polarized radiation from white dwarfs
81: is produced at the stellar surface as a result of the presence of Megagauss
82: dipolar magnetic fields \cite{cha92,lan92}. To first approximation the flux
83: of net circularly polarized light at wavelength $\lambda$ emitted toward
84: the observer from the surface is directly proportional to the strength of
85: the line of sight component of the magnetic field at the stellar surface.
86: Therefore, this net flux can be written as
87:
88: \begin{equation}\label{vl}
89: V_{\lambda,\src} = 2\pi\int_{0}^1I_{\lambda}(\mu)\cdot w(\mu) \mu\,d\mu \quad,
90: \end{equation}
91:
92: \vspace{0.4cm}
93: \noindent where $I(\mu)$ is the intensity at wavelength $\lambda$. The weightfunction $w(\mu)$
94: describes the strength of the vertical magnetic field component at position $\mu$.
95: Since our analysis encompasses different white dwarfs with different types of dipole
96: field geometries, $w(\mu)$ is calculated using an oblique dipolar rotator model which
97: is introduced in the next section.
98:
99: To define a degree of circular polarization, we have to divide (\ref{vl}) by the total
100: stellar flux emitted to the observer at wavelength $\lambda$
101:
102: \begin{equation}\label{fl}
103: F_{\lambda} = 2\pi\int_0^1I_{\lambda}(\mu)\mu\,d\mu \quad .
104: \end{equation}
105:
106: The function $I_{\lambda}(\mu)$ also describes the limb darkening of the star. Since
107: the surface of a white dwarf cannot be resolved the limb darkening cannot be
108: measured directly. Because the broadband spectrum of Grw +70$^{\circ}$8247 is well
109: represented by blackbody radiation \cite{gok82} and radiative equilibrium models
110: \cite{wf88,shp71} it is reasonable to assume a simple law like the one describing
111: the directly observed solar limb darkening. For this, we have chosen to use \cite{aln73}
112:
113: \begin{equation}\label{limb}
114: \frac{I_{\lambda}(\mu)}{I_{\lambda}(\mu=1)}=1+(\mu-1)g+(\mu^2-1)h \quad ,
115: \end{equation}
116: with
117: \begin{displaymath}
118: 0 \leq g+h \leq 1
119: \end{displaymath}
120:
121: for Grw +70$^{\circ}$8247. Since this kind of a linear interpolation is of a very
122: general form we have taken the limb darkening model of Grw +70$^{\circ}$8247 as a
123: prototype for the white dwarfs within our sample.
124:
125: In practise, we have evaluated the degree of circular polarization $(V_{\lambda,\src}/
126: F_{\lambda})$ numerically for increasing values of $k_{\star}$ and, in the case of
127: Grw +70$^{\circ}$8247, of $l_{\star}$. In contrast to the earlier work
128: of Solanki, Haugan and Mann \cite{shm99} (1999) we assume that the light emitted
129: by the source is polarized proportional to ${\bf B}$, i.e. to $w(\mu)$.
130: \section{Oblique dipolar rotator model}
131: The model we use was already described by Stift in 1975 \cite{stift} from
132: whom we adopted most of our notations.
133:
134: Starting with the observer's system where the z-axis is defined
135: by the line-of-sight, a surface point on the visible hemisphere
136: of the star is given by ${\bf z}$.
137: This vector is transformed into the rotation system of the star by
138: the matrix
139: \vspace{0.3cm}
140: \begin{equation}
141: S_i = \left(
142: \begin{array}{rrr}
143: 1&0&0\\
144: 0&\cos i&\sin i\\
145: 0&-\sin i&\cos i
146: \end{array}
147: \right) \quad ,
148: \end{equation}
149:
150: \vspace{0.3cm}
151: \noindent which is followed by a rotation around the rotational z-axis\vspace{0.3cm}
152: \begin{equation}
153: S_{\phi} = \left(
154: \begin{array}{rrr}
155: \cos\phi&\sin\phi&0 \\
156: -\sin\phi&\cos\phi&0\\
157: 0&0&1
158: \end{array}
159: \right) \quad .
160: \end{equation}
161:
162: \vspace{0.3cm}
163: \noindent The position of the dipole system relative to the rotational system
164: is uniquely described by the three Eulerian angles, e.g. by
165: \begin{equation}
166: S = S_{\xi}S_{\zeta}S_{\chi}
167: \end{equation}
168: \newpage
169: \noindent where $S_{\xi}$ and $S_{\chi}$ are generating rotations around
170: the x-axis and $S_{\zeta}$ around the z-axis. Since the only measurable
171: quantity in observations is the resulting tilt angle $\beta$ between
172: the dipole and rotation axis, the effect of the three Eulerian rotations
173: can be summarized without loss of generality by a rotation with $\beta$
174: around the x-axis.
175:
176: Given the offset coordinates of the dipole in the rotation system
177: by ${\bf x}$, we obtain the coordinates of the surface point ${\bf z}$
178: relative to the dipole system by
179: \begin{equation}
180: {\bf r} = S_{\beta}(S_{\phi}S_i{\bf z}-{\bf x}) \quad ,
181: \end{equation}
182: so that the field strength in the dipole system is given by
183: \begin{equation}
184: {\bf B}_{dp} = - \nabla({\bf m}\cdot {\bf r}/r^3) \quad .
185: \end{equation}
186: From this we get the field strength in the observer's system through
187: \begin{equation}\label{bobs}
188: {\bf B}_{obs} = S_i^T S_{\phi}^T S_{\beta}^T {\bf B}_{dp}
189: \end{equation}
190: where $S_i^T,\, S_{\phi}^T,\, S_{\beta}^T$ are the transpose matrices of
191: $S_i,\,S_{\phi},\,S_{\beta}$. The longitudinal field component in the
192: observer's system is then of course the ${\bf B}_{obs,z}$ component of
193: (\ref{bobs}).
194:
195: The effective field ${\bf B}_e$ for the visible hemisphere is then given by
196: \begin{equation}
197: {\bf B}_e = \int\int {\bf B}_zI\, dA \bigg/ \int\int I\,dA \quad .
198: \end{equation}
199: ${\bf B}_z$ denotes the line-of-sight component of ${\bf B}_{obs}$, while the
200: limb darkening is described, as above, by the empirical function $I$.
201: \begin{figure}[t]
202: \centerline{\psfig{figure=offset.eps,width=3.7in,height=3in}}
203: \caption{Geometrical representation of the dipole- relative to the
204: rotation system of the star with offsets. The rotation axis is inclined
205: to the observer by an angle $i$. In general, the offset dipole
206: is tilted against the rotation axis as described in Fig.3.2.}
207: \end{figure}
208:
209: \section{Grw +70$^{\circ}$8247}
210:
211: Within the class of magnetic white dwarfs, Grw +70$^{\circ}$8247 has played the role of a
212: ''Rosetta stone'' in the analysis and interpretation of their spectra. Although the first
213: measurement of circular and linear polarization in the spectrum of a white dwarf \cite{kem70}
214: gave a strong indication for a magnetic field, the presence of broad absorption features in
215: its blue spectrum remained unexplained until the 1980s. A solution of this puzzle was only
216: given after detailed calculations of hydrogen energy levels at field strengths $B > 100$ MG
217: \cite{hoc84,hoc85,fea84,rea84} so that, as a result, all spectral features could consistently
218: be explained in terms of stationary lines, i.e. lines whose wavelengths vary only slowly with
219: the field strength, of atomic hydrogen in a centered dipolar magnetic field
220: with a polar field strength of $\sim 320$ MG and a viewing angle (angle between the line
221: of sight and the magnetic axis) $i = 0^{\circ} - 30^{\circ}$ \cite{wf88,wun90,jor92}.
222:
223: In this way it was possible to determine the physical parameters of the stellar atmosphere
224: and of the magnetic field from a best fit of synthetic to observed spectra.
225: The observations can be best explained by an effective temperature of 14,000 K
226: \cite{wf88,gok82} which implies a radius of 0.0076 $R_{\odot}$ (determined from photometry and
227: parallax distance measurements), where $R_{\odot}$ is the solar radius, and a mass of about
228: 1.0 $M_{\odot}$, where $M_{\odot}$ is the solar mass \cite{shp79}. Since the characteristics
229: of the polarization curve have remained invariant for almost $\sim 25$ yr now \cite{wf00}
230: we can infer a very long rotation period of much more than 25 years. This slow rotation
231: is fitted into the obique rotator model by setting $\beta=0$, implying a dipole aligned
232: with the rotation axis. Thus at a given point in the observer system with polar coordinates
233: $(r,\theta,\phi)$, the Cartesian field components in the case $i = 0^{\circ}$ are
234: simply given by
235:
236: \begin{eqnarray}
237: B_x &=& 3 B_d \sin\theta\cos\theta\cos\phi/2r^3 \quad ,\\
238: B_y &=& 3 B_d \sin\theta\cos\theta\sin\phi/2r^3 \quad ,\\
239: B_z &=& B_d(3\cos^2\theta -1)/2r^3 \quad ,\label{bz}
240: \end{eqnarray}
241: where $B_d$ denotes the surface polar field strength for the case of a centered dipole.
242: In our case, the z-axis is also the line of sight. Since we focus on measurements of circular
243: polarization, only the longitudinal Zeeman-Effect is relevant for our purpose.
244:
245: Polarization measurements of Grw +70$^{\circ}$8247 yielded a level of $-6 \pm 0.25$\%
246: in the visible spectrum at 449 nm \cite{aea85,la75,aj94}. Since the constraints
247: on $k_{\star}^2$ and $l_{\star}^2$ are stronger for larger observed degrees of
248: polarization and shorter wavelengths we make use of Hubble Space Telescope
249: spectropolarimetry in the ultraviolet, which revealed high levels of circular
250: (12\%) and linear (20\%) polarization. This was measured between 130 and 140 nm
251: and is related to the absorption feature at 134.7 nm \cite{aj94}.
252: To be conservative, we assume a large absolute error of 1\% on these measurements, and
253: use a degree of circular polarization of 11\% at 134.7 nm.
254:
255: In 1999 Solanki, Haugan and Mann \cite{shm99} have used the NGT prediction to set
256: strong upper limits on $l^2_{\star}$ of the magnetic white dwarf Grw +70$^{\circ}$8247
257: with a very simple model of the magnetic field distribution. Although it became clear
258: in the meantime that NGT suffers from technical problems that render it mathematically
259: inconsistent, we also carry out the analysis based on Eq.(\ref{ngt-form}) for
260: Grw +70$^{\circ}$8247, in order to have a quantitative comparison between the old,
261: unrealistically simple and the improved model incorporating an oblique rotator of the
262: magnetic field.
263:
264: The results of our analysis can be seen in Fig.(\ref{grw-ngt}) and Fig.(\ref{grw-mag})
265: Our search for the largest values of $k_{\star}$ and $l_{\star}$ compatible with the
266: observed degree of cicular polarization at 134.7 nm yields the constraints
267: $k^2_{\star} \leq (0.074\, \mbox{km})^2$ and $l^2_{\star} \leq (4.1\, \mbox{km})^2$
268: for a viewing angle $i=0^{\circ}$. This limit on $l^2_{\star}$ is to be compared with
269: the former limit $l^2_{\star} \leq (4.9\, \mbox{km})^2$.
270: These results were obtained for limb darkening coefficients $(g,h)=(0,1)$, which provide the most
271: conservative constraints. Neglecting
272: limb darkening yields $k^2_{\star} \leq (0.06\, \mbox{km})^2$ and $l^2_{\star}
273: \leq (3.7 \,\mbox{km})^2$ compared with the old constraint $l^2_{\star} \leq (4.6\, \mbox{km})^2$.
274: For other values of the $(g,h)$ pair the constraint on $k_{\star}$ and $l_{\star}$ falls
275: between these extremes.
276:
277: For increasing viewing angle $i$ to the dipole axis the maximum degree of circular
278: polarization decreases, due to the dipole field geometry. From this it follows that constraints
279: on $k_{\star}$ become stronger for larger $i$, although the dependence turns out to be weak.
280: E.g. for $i=30^{\circ}$, we obtain the tiny improvement $k^2_{\star} \leq
281: (0.072\, \mbox{km})^2$ with limb darkening and $k^2_{\star} \leq (0.058\,
282: \mbox{km})^2$ without limb darkening. Hence the most conservative estimate is for $i=0$,
283: which we adopt.
284:
285: \begin{figure}[t]
286: \centerline{\psfig{figure=cone.eps,height=2.6in,width=2.6in}\hspace{1cm}
287: \psfig{figure=orient.eps,height=2.6in,width=2.6in}}
288: \caption{Left figure: Projection of the conelike movement of the magnetic pole during the
289: rotational period onto the celestial plane for $\beta \neq 0$. Right figure:
290: Relative orientation of the line-of-sight to the dipole axis and the rotational axis.
291: Adopted from Burleigh, Jordan and Schweizer \cite{bjo99}.}
292: \end{figure}
293:
294: \newpage
295:
296: \begin{figure}[h]
297: \centerline{
298: \psfig{figure=ngt-dp-i0.eps,height=3.1in,width=3.1in,angle=270}
299: \hspace*{0.3cm}
300: \psfig{figure=ngt-dp-i30-2.eps,height=3.1in,width=3.1in,angle=270}}
301: \caption{Observed degree of circularly polarized light for increasing
302: values of $\ell_{\star}$ from NGT, normalized to full intensity $I = 1$.
303: Left figure: Dipole inclination $i=0^{\circ}$. Right figure: Dipole
304: inclination $i=30^{\circ}$. The different curves are for different limb darkening
305: parameters. The horizontal line represents the observed
306: value of 11\%.}
307: \label{grw-ngt}
308: \vspace*{1cm}
309: \centerline{
310: \psfig{figure=mag-dp-i0.eps,height=3.1in,width=3.1in}
311: \hspace*{0.3cm}
312: \psfig{figure=mag-dp-i30.eps,height=3.1in,width=3.1in}}
313: \caption{Observed degree of circularly polarized light for increasing
314: values of $k_{\star}$ from metric-affine gravity, normalized to
315: full intensity $I = 1$. Left figure: Dipole inclination $i=0^{\circ}$.
316: Right figure: Dipole inclination $i=30^{\circ}$. The different curves
317: are for different limb darkening parameters. The horizontal line
318: represents the observed value of 11\%.}
319: \label{grw-mag}
320: \end{figure}
321: \clearpage
322:
323: \section{RE J0317-853}
324: \subsection{Introduction}
325: RE J0317-853 is certainly a highly unusual object which sets several records within the class
326: of isolated magnetic white dwarfs. Discovered in 1995 as an extreme-ultraviolet source during
327: the {\sf ROSAT} Wide Field Camera (WFC) all-sky survey by Barstow et al. \cite{b95} (hereafter B95)
328: the analysis of B95 revealed an unusual hot white dwarf with an effective temperature of
329: $\approx 50000$ K and an exceptionally intense dipolar magnetic field of $\approx 340$ MG.
330: B95 also reported nearly identical photometric and polarimetric variations of 725.4 s. Since
331: the most plausible explanation is that these modulations are due to the rotation of the star, this
332: would lead to the fastest rotation period ever measured so far among the isolated magnetic white
333: dwarfs which have typical periods of several hours. Finally, the close proximity of the ordinary,
334: DA white dwarf LB09802, separated by only 16'' allowed B95 identify RE J0317-853 as a member of a
335: double degenerate pair, which then enabled them to estimate the mass of RE J0317-853 at
336: $1.35\,M_{\odot}$, close to the Chandrasekhar limit, which makes it the so far most massive known
337: isolated white dwarf with a corresponding radius of only $0.0035\, R_{\odot}$. They found that
338: their data are best matched by a dipole model with a negative offset along the dipole axis of
339: 20\% viewed at an angle of $60^{\circ}$. Polarization measurements were not reported by B95.
340:
341: Ferrario et al. (hereafter F97) modelled phase-averaged spectropolarimetric data of RE J0317-853
342: in 1997 and obtained a dipole model with a polar field strength of $B_d=450$ MG and a negative
343: offset of 35\% of the stellar radius along the dipole axis. Their best fits were derived for
344: mean viewing angles to the dipole axis of $30^{\circ}-60^{\circ}$. Furthermore, they reported
345: variations in the wavelength-averaged circular polarization data at a period of $725 \pm 10 $
346: s which confirmed the results from B95. More important for our work is that F97 also found
347: circular polarization in the continuum up to a maximum of 8\% in the wavelength range from 5600
348: {\AA} - 5800 {\AA}. To be conservative, we adopted for our purpose the maximum value of 5800 {\AA}
349: and as for the B95 data the maximum limb darkening coefficients $g=0,\,h=1$.
350:
351: The so far most detailed investigation regarding the magnetic field geometry of RE J0317-853
352: was published by Burleigh, Jordan and Schweizer in 1999 \cite{bjo99}. Using phase-resolved,
353: far-UV HST Faint Object Spectrograph spectra they obtained the best fit for a dipole with
354: $B_d=363$ MG and additional offsets perpendicular to the $z$-axis: $x_{\off}=0.057, \,
355: y_{\off}=-0.04$ and $z_{\off}=-0.22$. In this model the rotation axis is viewed at an angle of
356: $i=50^{\circ}$ to the observer while the relative angle between rotation and dipole axis was
357: found to be $\beta=42^{\circ}$, leading to visible surface field strengths between 140 and 730 MG.
358: In addition they reported the limb darkening coefficients $g=0.3$ and $h=0$.
359: In 1999 Jordan and Burleigh (hereafter JB99 \cite{jb99}) reported a peak level of circular
360: polarization at $22$\% integrated over the wavelength range between 3400 {\AA} and 7000 {\AA}
361: measured in spectropolarimetric data taken with the AAT (Anglo-Australian Telescope). This
362: is up to now the highest level of circular polarization ever recorded for a magnetic white dwarf.
363: Although it seems very likely from the data in JB99 that the real wavelength range in which the high
364: level of circular polarization was measured is between 5600 {\AA} and 5800 {\AA} this
365: conjecture was so far not confirmed by the authors.
366: \subsection{Birefringence analysis}
367: \begin{figure}[t]
368: \centerline{\hspace*{-0.5cm}\psfig{figure=phases-ii.ps,width=7in,height=3.3in}}
369: \centerline{\psfig{figure=colorbar.ps,width=4in,height=0.5in}}
370: \caption{Successive rotational phases of RE J0317-853 in steps of $0.25 \pi$,
371: beginning with $\phi=0.25 \pi$ (top left) to $\phi=2 \pi$ (bottom right). The dashed
372: line markes the stellar equator whereas the solid line shows the projection of the
373: magnetic equator on the stellar surface. The cross marks the position of the rotation
374: axis and the dot the position of the magnetic pole.}
375: \label{phases}
376: \end{figure}
377:
378: Due to its small radius and high degree of circular polarization, RE J0317-853 is
379: a very suitably object concerning limits on gravitational birefringence. Unfortunately
380: the wavelength range in which the polarization was measured by F97 as well as by JB99
381: lies in the optical regime and additionaly is up to now not very well isolated in the
382: case of the 22\% measurement of JB99 \cite{jb99}. So, in order to get here conservative
383: and reliable upper limits on gravitational birefringence we use 7000{\AA} which marks
384: the upper end of the measured spectral range. For comparison we also present our estimates
385: in the case of 5800 {\AA} as the upper wavelength end.
386:
387: For our analysis of the JB99 data we also need information about the magnetic field
388: geometry at that rotation phase, when the highest degree of polarization is emitted
389: towards the observer. Since the highest degree is obtained for the highest average
390: longitudinal magnetic field strength over the visible hemisphere we have plotted in
391: Fig.(\ref{phases}) successive rotational phases of RE J0317-853 in steps of $0.25 \pi$
392: based on the reported offset values $x_{\off}=0.057, \, y_{\off}=-0.04, \,z_{\off}=-0.22$,
393: limb darkening coefficients $g=0.3,\,h=0$ from (\ref{limb}) and the angles $i=50^{\circ}$ and
394: $\beta=42^{\circ}$ by Burleigh, Jordan and Schweizer \cite{bjo99}. The longitudinal
395: field strength on the surface is colorcoded whereby the blue color denotes positive and
396: the red color negative polarity. It can be seen, that in phase $\phi = 0.25 \pi$ the
397: different polarities nearly cancel each other so that the disk averaged field strength is
398: approximately zero. During the progression of the rotation the average field strength
399: increases up to $\phi = \pi$ and then subsequently decreases. This is also quantitatively
400: shown in Fig.(\ref{polcurve}).
401:
402: \begin{figure}[t]
403: \centerline{\psfig{figure=polcurve.ps,width=4in,height=3.in,angle=90}}
404: \caption{Integrated longitudinal $({\bf B}_z)$ magnetic field strength of the visible
405: hemisphere for successive rotational phases of RE J0317-853.}
406: \label{polcurve}
407: \end{figure}
408:
409: So, by using the oblique rotator model, described in Sec. 3.2 we obtain an upper limit of
410: $k^2_{\star} \leq (0.038\, \mbox{km})^2$ for a wavelength of 7000{\AA} and
411: $k^2_{\star} \leq (0.036\, \mbox{km})^2$ in the case of 5800 {\AA}. For both wavelengths
412: we have used the limb darkening coefficients $g=0.3$ and $h=0$.
413: The F97 data yielded a result of $k^2_{\star} \leq (0.05\,\mbox{km})^2$ for
414: $i=30^{\circ}$ and $k^2_{\star} \leq (0.051\, \mbox{km})^2$ for the case of $i=60^{\circ}$
415: and $g=0,\,h=1$ with a polarization level of 8\% at 5800 {\AA}.
416:
417: % Finally, to have a comparison between different field geometries, we assumed for the B95 data
418: % a polarization level of 8\% at 5800 {\AA} as in F97. This yielded a similar result of
419: % $k^2_{\star} \leq (1.48\cdot 10^{-3}\, \mbox{km})^2$.
420: The table below summarises the various upper limits for $k$ obtained for the data from B95, F97 and
421: BJS99.
422: \begin{center}
423: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.4}
424: \begin{tabular}{|c||c|c|c|}\hline
425: & $i$ & $\beta$ & $k$ (km) \\ \cline{2-4}
426: % \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{B95 (8\%)} & & & \\
427: % \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{$x_{\off}=0$, $y_{\off}=0$ ,$z_{\off}=-0.2$}
428: % & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{$60^{\circ}$}
429: % & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{$(0^{\circ})$}
430: % & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{$1.48\cdot 10^{-3}$} \\ \hline
431: & & & \\
432: \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{F97 (8\%)}
433: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{$30^{\circ}$}
434: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{$(0^{\circ})$}
435: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{$0.05$} \\
436: \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{$x_{\off}=0$, $y_{\off}=0$ ,$z_{\off}=-0.35$}
437: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{$60^{\circ}$}
438: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{$(0^{\circ})$}
439: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{$0.051$} \\ \hline
440: & & & \\
441: \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{BJS99 (22\%)} & $50^{\circ}$ & $42^{\circ}$ &
442: \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{$0.038$} \\
443: \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{$x_{\off}=0.057$, $y_{\off}=-0.04$ ,$z_{\off}=-0.22$}
444: & & &
445: \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{$0.036$}\\ \hline
446: \end{tabular}
447:
448: \vspace{0.5cm}
449: \small{Tab.3.1: Upper limits on $k$ for the F97 and BJS99 data.}
450: \end{center}
451:
452:
453: \section{PG 2329+267}
454: The magnetic nature of the white dwarf PG 2329+267 was discovered in 1995 by Moran, Marsh
455: and Dillon by observing the characteristic Zeeman splitting of Balmer lines \cite{mor98}. The
456: subsequent analysis revealed a centered dipole inclined at $i=60^{\circ}\pm 5^{\circ}$ to the
457: observer with a polar field strength of appoximately 2.3 MG. Rotation of the star was not
458: reported, so that we take $\beta=0$. The mass was determined at $\approx 0.9\, M_{\odot}$ which
459: means that PG 2329+267 is more massive than typical isolated white dwarfs. The radius was not
460: measured so far, so that we calculated it, using the mass-radius relation given by Weinberg
461: \cite{wb}. Asuming a helium star we got $R = 0.0156\,R_{\odot}$. This radius would decrease if we
462: asume heavier elements than helium which, in turn would lead to a stronger gravitational
463: birefringence, so that this is certainly a conservative limit on $R$. The results of the
464: circular spectropolarimetric measurements in the H$\alpha$ line are shown in Fig.(\ref{pg2329}).
465: One can see very clear the S-shaped profile in the upper panel, indicating a magnetic field,
466: with a peak level in the $\sigma$ components of approximately 10\% at 6530 {\AA}.
467: As in the case of Grw +70$^{\circ}$8247 we have calculated the observable degree of circular polarization
468: for increasing values of $k$ and for different limb darkening parameters. For $i=55^{\circ}$ we
469: found $k^2_{\star} \leq (0.25\, \mbox{km})^2$ if limb darkening is neglegted and
470: $k^2_{\star} \leq (0.31\, \mbox{km})^2$ for maximum limb darkening. In the case of
471: $i=65^{\circ}$ we obtain $k^2_{\star} \leq (0.23\, \mbox{km})^2$
472: and $k^2_{\star} \leq (0.28\, \mbox{km})^2$, respectively.
473:
474: \begin{figure}[t]
475: \centerline{\psfig{figure=whtspec2.ps,width=5.5in,height=3.5in}}
476: \caption{Upper panel: Percentage of circularly polarized light, present in the $H\alpha$
477: spectrum of PG 2329+267. Lower panel: The normalized spectrum. From: Moran, Marsh and
478: Dhillon (1998) \cite{mor98}.}
479: \label{pg2329}
480: \end{figure}
481:
482: \section{40 Eridani B}
483:
484: \begin{figure}[t]
485: \centerline{\hspace*{-0.5cm}\psfig{figure=eri-phases.ps,width=7in,height=3.3in}}
486: \centerline{\psfig{figure=eri-colorbar.ps,width=4in,height=0.5in}}
487: \caption{Successive rotational phases of 40 Eridani B in steps of $0.25 \pi$,
488: beginning with $\phi=0.25 \pi$ (top left) to $\phi=2 \pi$ (bottom right). The
489: poles of the grid match those of the magnetic dipole.}
490: \label{eri-phases}
491: \end{figure}
492:
493: 40 Eridani B is one of the most famous white dwarfs and represents together with Sirius B the first
494: known examples of this class of degenerate stars. The mass and radius of 40 Eri B were determined by
495: Koester and Weidemann in 1991 \cite{kw91} and more recently by Shipman et al. \cite{shp97} with the
496: result of $M=0.501\pm 0.011 M_{\odot}$ and $R=0.0136 \pm 0.00024 R_{\odot}$. Its magnetic field was
497: measured in 1999 by Fabrika et al. \cite{fbr00} using time-resolved Zeeman spectroscopy. From their
498: data they concluded the presence of a centered dipole with an average field strength of several kG.
499: The rotational axis was reported to be inclined at $i\approx 90^{\circ}$ to the observer with a
500: rotation period of about 4 hours. The magnetic axis inclination to the rotational axis is about
501: the same, $\beta \approx 90^{\circ}$. Fig.(\ref{eri-phases}) shows successive rotational phases of
502: 40 Eri B using the given parameters. The circular polarization measurements reported by Fabrika et
503: al. \cite{fbr00} in the H$\alpha$ line core (see Fig.\ref{fab-circ} on the next page) yielded a level
504: of 10\% at $\approx 6564$ {\AA}. As for REJ0317-853 we have taken the magnetic field geometry of the
505: rotation phase $\phi=\pi$ with the highest average surface field strength for our analysis. With the
506: given parameters we obtained an upper limit $k^2_{\star} \leq (0.35\, \mbox{km})^2$ neglecting limb
507: darkening and $k^2_{\star} \leq (0.44\, \mbox{km})^2$ with maximum limb darkening.
508:
509: \newpage
510:
511:
512:
513: \begin{figure}[t]
514: \centerline{\psfig{figure=fabrica.ps,width=5.in,height=6.5in}}
515: \caption{Top panel: Polarization obtained from individual spectra of the zero polarization
516: ''cross-over point'' at $0.5 \pi$ or $1.5 \pi$. Bottom: Two spectra of different
517: polarization in the region of the $H \alpha$ line core. The magnetic shift is clearly
518: visible. Middle: The result of the substraction of these spectra, i.e. Stokes $V$.
519: From Fabrika et al. (2000) \cite{fbr00}.}
520: \label{fab-circ}
521: \end{figure}
522: \clearpage
523:
524: \section{Comparison of the results}
525: After we have obtained several upper limits on $k^2$ for various objects (including the sun) it is
526: interesting to ask, whether we can find a correlation between them. For this purpose we have listed
527: in Tab. 3.2 the masses and radii in solar units of the investigated objects, together with the
528: corresponding highest and lowest upper limits on $k^2$ obtained from our analysis and their mean
529: values in the fourth column. The last column shows the corresponding ratio $\Phi$ between the
530: Schwarzschildradius $r_S=2GM/c^2$ of the star and its physical radius $R$, i.e. $\Phi=2GM/(Rc^2)$.
531:
532: \vspace{0.5cm}
533: \begin{center}
534: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.4}
535: \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|}\hline
536: & $M/M_{\odot}$ & $R/R_{\odot}$ & $k^2$ (km)$^2$ & $\overline{k^2}$ (km)$^2$ & $\Phi=2GM/Rc^2 \, (10^{-4})$ \\ \cline{2-6}
537: & & & & & \\
538: \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{Sun}
539: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{1}
540: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{1}
541: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{0.69 - 1.95}
542: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{1.32}
543: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{0.042} \\
544: \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{40 Eri B}
545: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{0.5}
546: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{0.013}
547: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{0.35 - 0.44}
548: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{0.395}
549: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{1.614}\\
550: \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{PG 2329}
551: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{0.9}
552: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{0.0156}
553: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{0.23 - 0.28}
554: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{0.255}
555: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{2.42}\\
556: \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{GRW}
557: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{1}
558: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{0.0076}
559: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{0.058 - 0.074}
560: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{0.066}
561: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{5.52}\\
562: \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{RE J0317}
563: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{1.35}
564: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{0.0035}
565: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{0.036 - 0.051}
566: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{0.0435}
567: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{16.2}\\ \hline
568: \end{tabular}
569: \end{center}
570:
571: \vspace{0.5cm}
572: {\small \noindent Tab.3.2: Relevant data of considered objects. First and second column: Mass and Radius
573: in solar units. Third column: Range of upper limits on $k^2$ obtained from our analysis. Mean values
574: $\overline{k^2}$ in the fourth column. The last column gives the ratio $\Phi$ between Schwarzschild and
575: physical radius $\times 10^{-4}$.}
576:
577: \vspace{0.5cm}
578: \noindent The first thing which attracts attention is that the limits on $k^2$ decrease for increasing $\Phi$
579: of the stellar objects. This correlation is graphically shown in Fig. \ref{pout} on the next page
580: where we plot from Tab. 3.2 the mean value of $k^2$ for each object against $\Phi$, marked by solid diamonds.
581: The best fit to this distribution can be found with gaussian linear regression method. This yields
582:
583: \begin{equation}\label{k-phi}
584: k^2(\Phi) = 1.363982\cdot (\exp(-\Phi^{0.7})+0.04\,\Phi^{-0.18}) \quad .
585: \end{equation}
586:
587: The agreement between the values $k^2(\Phi)$ of the fittet curve and the measured $\overline{k^2}$ are quite
588: good as one can see in Tab. 3.3. Therefore, (\ref{k-phi}) can be interpreted in that way, that it gives
589: approximately those upper limits on $k^2$ which one could expect for celestial bodies of mass $M$ and radius
590: $R$ by using the polarization modelling technique used in this chapter. For example an object of about the mass
591: and the size of the earth $(M_E=5.97\cdot 10^{24}\mbox{kg},\,R=6.378\cdot 10^6 \mbox{m})$ would give
592: $k^2_E \lsim (1.771501 \,\mbox{km})^2$, while a supermassive black hole similar to the one suspected in the
593: center of our galaxy with $M_{BH}=2.5\cdot 10^6 M_{\odot}$ and a Schwarzschildradius of $r_S=2GM/c^2=2.969\cdot
594: 10^9 \mbox{m}$ would give $k^2_{BH}\lsim (0.010396 \,\mbox{km})^2$. Finally we note that this would also be the
595: upper limit for any other object which has reached its Schwarzschildradius, since $k^2_{\star}(\Phi)$ depends
596: only on the ratio $r_S/R_{\star}$.
597:
598: \clearpage
599:
600: \begin{figure}[h]
601: \centerline{\psfig{figure=pout.eps,width=4.5in,height=4.5in}}
602: \caption{Mean value of $k^2$ plotted against the corresponding ratio $\Phi$ in units of $10^{-4}$. The
603: distribution can be fitted by a smooth curve, given in the text. The different ranges
604: of the $k^2$ values are of about the same size as the symbols and therefore omitted.}
605: \label{pout}
606: \end{figure}
607:
608: \begin{center}
609: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.4}
610: \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|}\hline
611: & $k^2(\Phi)$ & $\overline{k^2}$ & Deviation from $\overline{k^2}$ in \% \\ \cline{2-4}
612: & & & \\
613: \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{Sun}
614: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{1.320012}
615: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{1.320}
616: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{$9\cdot 10^{-4}$} \\
617: \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{40 Eri B}
618: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{0.387055}
619: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{0.395}
620: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{2.01} \\
621: \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{PG 2329}
622: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{0.259636}
623: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{0.255}
624: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{1.81} \\
625: \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{GRW}
626: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{0.090102}
627: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{0.066}
628: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{36.5} \\
629: \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{RE J0317}
630: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{0.034262}
631: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{0.0435}
632: & \raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{21.23} \\ \hline
633:
634:
635: \end{tabular}
636: \end{center}
637:
638: \vspace{0.5cm}
639: {\small \noindent Tab.3.3: Comparison of $k^2(\Phi)$ values from the fitted curve with the measured
640: mean values $k^2$. The last column gives the relative deviation in percent of the fitted from
641: the measured values.}
642:
643: \clearpage
644: \section{Discussion and Conclusions}
645: We have used spectropolarimetric observations of the white dwarfs Grw +70$^{\circ}$8247,
646: RE J0317-853, PG 2329+267 and 40 Eridani B to impose new strong constraints on gravitational
647: birefringence. To improve earlier investigations of Grw +70$^{\circ}$8247 we employed a
648: dipole model for the magnetic field structure which leads to, on average, an 18\% sharper
649: limit.
650:
651: However, for all white dwarfs we have considerd our constraints on $k_{\star}$ and $l_{\star}$
652: strongly depend on the sophisticated form of the weight function $w(\mu)$. At the moment,
653: $w(\mu)$ only gives very conservative results from a simple relation between the magnetic
654: field strength at a certain position on the visible stellar disc and the emitted degree of
655: cicular polarization. So, the next step to enhance $w(\mu)$ could consist of calculating
656: numerically the theoretical degree of circular polarization for each point on the stellar
657: disc by using simulations of radiative transfer in stellar atmospheres. A further, clear
658: improvement on the constraint on $k_{\star}$ should be possible within this approach.
659:
660: The possibiliy, given by (\ref{k-phi}) to calculate approximate values for upper limits on $k^2$
661: depending on the ratio between the Schwarzschild and physical radius is certainly a useful result.
662: Those values could be used as a guideline for the birefringence analysis of other objects. However,
663: the constant numerical values in (\ref{k-phi}) possibly have to changed slightly when measured
664: $k^2$ values of other objects has to be fitted into this scheme.
665:
666:
667:
668:
669:
670: