1: \documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
2: %\documentclass[onecolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amssymb]{revtex4}
3: %\documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amssymb]{revtex4}
4: %\documentclass[preprint,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amssymb,nofootinbib]{revtex4}
5:
6: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
7: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
8: \usepackage{bm}
9:
10: \begin{document}
11:
12: \title{Numerical analysis of quasinormal modes in nearly extremal Schwarzschild-de
13: Sitter spacetimes}
14:
15: \author{Shijun Yoshida}
16: \email{yoshida@fisica.ist.utl.pt}
17: \affiliation{
18: Centro Multidisciplinar de Astrof\'{\i}sica - CENTRA,
19: Departamento de F\'{\i}sica, Instituto Superior T\'ecnico,
20: Av. Rovisco Pais 1, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal}
21:
22: \author{Toshifumi Futamase}
23: \email{tof@astr.tohoku.ac.jp}
24: \affiliation{Astronomical Institute, Graduate School of Science,
25: Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan}
26:
27: \date{\today}
28:
29: \begin{abstract}
30:
31: We calculate high-order quasinormal modes with large imaginary frequencies
32: for electromagnetic and gravitational perturbations in nearly extremal
33: Schwarzschild-de Sitter spacetimes. Our results show that for low-order quasinormal
34: modes, the analytical approximation formula in the extremal limit derived by Cardoso
35: and Lemos is a quite good approximation for the quasinormal frequencies as long as the
36: model parameter $r_1\kappa_1$ is small enough, where $r_1$ and $\kappa_1$ are the
37: black hole horizon radius and the surface gravity, respectively. For high-order
38: quasinormal modes, to which corresponds quasinormal frequencies with large imaginary
39: parts, on the other hand, this formula becomes inaccurate even for small
40: values of $r_1\kappa_1$. We also find that the real parts of the quasinormal
41: frequencies have oscillating behaviors in the limit of highly damped modes, which are
42: similar to those observed in the case of a Reissner-Nordstr{\" o}m black hole.
43: The amplitude of oscillating ${\rm Re(\omega)}$ as a function of
44: ${\rm Im}(\omega)$ approaches a non-zero constant
45: value for gravitational perturbations and zero for electromagnetic
46: perturbations in the limit of highly damped modes, where $\omega$ denotes the
47: quasinormal frequency. This means that for gravitational perturbations, the
48: real part of quasinormal modes of the nearly extremal Schwarzschild-de Sitter
49: spacetime appears not to approach any constant value in the limit of highly damped
50: modes. On the other hand, for electromagnetic perturbations, the real part of
51: frequency seems to go to zero in the limit.
52:
53: \end{abstract}
54:
55: \pacs{04.70.Bw, 04.70.-s, 04.30.-w}
56:
57: \maketitle
58:
59: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
60: \section{Introduction}
61: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
62: The quasinormal modes (QNMs) of spacetimes containing black holes
63: have been studied since the pioneering work of Vishveshwara \cite{vish}, who
64: first observed quasinormal ringing of a Schwarzschild spacetime in his
65: numerical calculations.
66: The main motivation to study the QNM of a black hole is twofold:
67: One is to answer the question of whether the spacetime is stable or not, and the other
68: to know what kind of oscillations will be excited in the spacetime when
69: some perturbations are given. In an astrophysical point of view, the latter is
70: quite important from the observational point of view because we could
71: determine fundamental parameters of a black hole, such as the mass or
72: the angular momentum, through the information of the QNMs. Thus, a large number
73: of studies on the QNMs of spacetimes containing black holes
74: have been done (for review, see, e.g., \cite{kokkotas99,nollert99}).
75:
76:
77: There is another interesting aspect of the QNMs in a black hole which
78: is related to the quantum theory of gravity. Bekenstein and Mukhanov
79: discussed the relationship between the fundamental area unit in the quantum
80: theory of gravity and a Bohr transition frequency, applying Bohr's
81: correspondence principle with a hydrogen atom to the quantum theory of
82: a black hole \cite{MB95,B97}. For a Schwarzschild black hole, they then
83: derived the Bohr transition frequency $\omega$, given by
84: %
85: \begin{equation}
86: \omega = \ln k / 8\pi M \,,
87: \label{bekenstein}
88: \end{equation}
89: %
90: where $k=2, 3, 4\cdots$, and $M$ stands for the mass of a black hole.
91: Furthermore they predicted the value of $k$ to be
92: $k=2$, and suggested that this frequency should be equal to classical
93: oscillation frequencies of the black hole.
94: %
95: A few years ago, Hod however noticed that if $k=3$, the frequency
96: given by formula (\ref{bekenstein}) is in quite good agreement with the
97: asymptotic frequency of the QNM of a Schwarzschild black hole in the
98: limit of highly damped modes, and proposed to apply Bohr's correspondence
99: principle in order to determine the value of the fundamental area unit
100: in the quantum theory of gravity, namely the value of $k$ \cite{hod} (see, also
101: \cite{dreyer}). Since Hod's
102: proposal, the QNMs with large imaginary frequencies of spacetimes
103: including black holes have been attracted much attention, and a lot of
104: papers related to this subject have appeared in order to see
105: whether Hod's conjecture is applicable not only for a Schwarzschild
106: black hole but also for other black hole spacetimes. For example, Motl
107: analytically obtained an asymptotic constant value of the QNM
108: frequencies of a Schwarzschild black hole \cite{motl}, which had
109: been obtained numerically by Nollert \cite{nollert}. Motl and
110: Neitzke \cite{motl03}, Berti and Kokkotas \cite{berti}, Neitzke \cite{an03},
111: and Andersson and Howls
112: \cite{andersson_howls} studied the asymptotic behaviors of the QNMs in a
113: Reissner-Nordstr{\" o}m black hole. Berti et al. \cite{bertietal}, and Hod
114: \cite{hod03} discussed the QNMs of a Kerr black hole in the limit of highly damped
115: modes.
116: As for a Schwarzschild-de Sitter (SdS) black hole, Cardoso and Lemos
117: \cite{cardoso03} and Maassen van den Brink \cite{brink} analytically obtained
118: asymptotic form of the QNM frequencies in almost the extremal limit, in which
119: the cosmological horizon becomes very close to the black hole horizon
120: (for the case of a Schwarzschild black hole in an anti-de Sitter spacetime,
121: see, e.g., \cite{CKL03,K02}).
122:
123:
124: A large number of papers related to Hod's conjecture, which have recently
125: appeared, suggest that Hod's conjecture is not universal, at least as it
126: stands, even though it is applicable for Schwarzschild black holes in four
127: and higher dimensions (for the higher dimensional case, see, e.g.,
128: \cite{motl03,db03,an03,cly03}). For example, a
129: real part of the quasinormal frequencies in a Reissner-Nordstr{\" o}m black hole
130: appears not to go to any constant value in the limit of highly damped mode,
131: but shows some periodic behaviors as the imaginary part is increased
132: \cite{motl03,berti,an03,andersson_howls}. This means that Hod's conjecture is not
133: applicable in the Reissner-Nordstr{\" o}m case because a real part of the
134: quasinormal frequencies does not have a limit as the imaginary part goes to infinity.
135: In such a situation, it is necessary to explore a problem whether or not there
136: is another black hole spacetime in which Hod's conjecture is applicable.
137: The purpose of this paper is to improve our understanding of this problem
138: and we are concerned here with the QNMs of SdS spacetimes.
139: SdS spacetime has no spatial infinity but has cosmological horizon, and if
140: Hod's conjecture is applicable, it is interesting to see whether Hod's conjecture
141: depends only on the black hole horizon, but not the cosmological horizon.
142: Furthermore, recent observations show that the universe does have a non-zero positive
143: cosmological constant. Therefore, SdS spacetimes are considered to be a good simple
144: model of a black hole in the universe.
145:
146: In this study, in particular, we calculate numerically the QNMs of nearly
147: extremal SdS spacetimes for reason we describe below.
148: We therefore assume the surface gravity $\kappa_1$ at the
149: black hole horizon to be $\kappa_1\le 10^{-2}\ r_1^{-1}$,
150: where $r_1$ stands for the coordinate radius of the black hole horizon. Note that
151: the extremal limit of the SdS space corresponds to the limit of $\kappa_1\rightarrow 0$.
152: In a nearly extremal SdS black hole, as mentioned before, an analytical formula for
153: quasinormal frequencies can be derived \cite{cardoso03,brink}. One of the aims of this
154: paper is to examine whether this analytical formula is correct in the limit of highly
155: damped modes.
156:
157: The paper is organized as follows.
158: In \S 2 we present the basic equations for obtaining QNMs
159: in the SdS spacetime using Leaver's continued fraction technique \cite{leaver},
160: which was extended to the case
161: of the SdS spacetime by Moss and Norman \cite{moss}.
162: Numerical results are given in \S 3, and \S 4 is devoted for
163: conclusion.
164:
165:
166:
167: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
168: \section{Method of Solutions}
169: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
170: In order to examine the QNMs of the SdS spacetime, we make use of the same
171: formalism as that derived by Moss
172: and Norman \cite{moss}, who obtained low-order quasinormal frequencies of the SdS
173: spacetime for a wide range of the model parameter. The line element of the SdS
174: spacetime is given by
175: %
176: \begin{equation}
177: ds^2=-{\Delta\over r^2}\,dt^2+{r^2\over\Delta}\,dr^2+
178: r^2(d\theta^2+\sin^2\theta\,d\phi^2)\,,
179: \label{metric}
180: \end{equation}
181: %
182: where
183: %
184: \begin{equation}
185: \Delta=r^2-2Mr-{1\over 3}\Lambda r^4\,.
186: \label{def-delta}
187: \end{equation}
188: %
189: Here, $M$ and $\Lambda$ stand for the mass of the black hole and the cosmological
190: constant, respectively. If a non-negative cosmological constant is assumed,
191: namely de Sitter spacetime, there are two horizons, whose radial coordinates are
192: given as positive solutions of $r^{-1}\Delta=r-2M-{1\over 3}\Lambda r^3=0$,
193: one is the black hole horizon $r=r_1$ and the other the cosmological horizon
194: $r=r_2$, where $r_2>r_1>0$. Note that the equation $r-2M-{1\over 3}\Lambda r^3=0$
195: has one negative solution $r=r_3<0$ for the SdS space. One of the important model
196: parameters of the SdS spacetime is the surface gravity $\kappa_1$, defined by
197: %
198: \begin{equation}
199: \kappa_1=\lim_{r\rightarrow r_1}{1\over 2r^2}{d\Delta\over dr}\,.
200: \label{def-kappa}
201: \end{equation}
202: %
203: In terms of the non-dimensional surface gravity $r_1\kappa_1$, the mass and the
204: cosmological constant can be written as
205: %
206: \begin{equation}
207: M={1\over 3}r_1(r_1\kappa_1+1)\,,\quad \Lambda=r_1^{-2}(1-2r_1\kappa_1)\,,
208: \end{equation}
209: %
210: which shows that $0<r_1\kappa_1<1/2$ for the SdS spacetime. In this study,
211: we employ the non-dimensional parameter $r_1\kappa_1$ to specify the SdS
212: spacetime.
213:
214:
215: By virtue of the symmetry properties of the SdS spacetime, the master equations
216: for the scalar ($s=0$), electromagnetic ($s=1$) and gravitational perturbations ($s=2$)
217: can be cast into a wave equation of the simple form, given by \cite{mm90,of91,cl01}
218: %
219: \begin{equation}
220: {d^2\phi(r)\over dr_*^2}+[\omega^2-V(r)]\phi(r)=0\,,
221: \label{wave-equation}
222: \end{equation}
223: %
224: where $r_*$ denotes the tortoise coordinate, defined by $dr_*=r^2\Delta^{-1}dr$,
225: and $\omega$ is the oscillation frequency of the perturbations. Depending on the
226: type of perturbations, here, the effective potential is explicitly given by
227: %
228: \begin{equation}
229: {r^4V\over\Delta}=\left\{
230: \begin{array}{ll}
231: l(l+1)+{2M\over r}-{2\Lambda r^2\over 3}&{\rm for\ } s=0 \\
232: l(l+1)&{\rm for\ } s=1 \\
233: l(l+1)-{6M\over r}&{\rm for\ } s=2\,,
234: \end{array}
235: \right.
236: \label{def-potential}
237: \end{equation}
238: %
239: where $l$ means the angular quantum number of perturbations. Here, only the
240: axial parity perturbations have been considered for the gravitational case because
241: quasinormal frequencies of the polar parity perturbations are the same as those
242: of the axial parity perturbations (for the proof, see Appendix).
243:
244:
245: The QNMs of the SdS spacetime are characterized by the boundary
246: conditions of incoming waves at the black hole horizon and outgoing waves at
247: the cosmological horizon, given by
248: %
249: \begin{equation}
250: \phi(r)\rightarrow\left\{
251: \begin{array}{ll}
252: e^{-i\omega r_*}&{\rm as}\ r_*\rightarrow \infty\\
253: e^{ i\omega r_*}&{\rm as}\ r_*\rightarrow-\infty\,,
254: \end{array}
255: \right.
256: \label{def-bc}
257: \end{equation}
258: %
259: where the time dependence of perturbations has been assumed to be $e^{i\omega t}$.
260: In general, it is impossible to adapt the boundary condition (\ref{def-bc}) in
261: a straightforward numerical integration to obtain quasinormal frequencies. Some
262: special technique is therefore required for computations of QNMs.
263: In the present investigation, we employ a standard technique devised by Leaver, namely
264: the continued fraction method \cite{moss,leaver}.
265:
266:
267: To apply the continued fraction method to the SdS spacetime, it is convenient to
268: introduce a new independent variable, defined by $x=r^{-1}$. With this new variable
269: $x$, the asymptotic form of the perturbations as $r_*\rightarrow\infty$ can be
270: rewritten as
271: %
272: \begin{equation}
273: e^{-i\omega r_*}=(x-x_1)^{-\rho_1}(x-x_2)^{-\rho_2}(x-x_3)^{-\rho_3}\,,
274: \label{expwr}
275: \end{equation}
276: %
277: where $x_i=r_i^{-1}$ and $\rho_i=i\omega/(2\kappa_i)$ for $i=1,2,3$, where
278: %
279: \begin{eqnarray}
280: \kappa_1&=&M(x_1-x_2)(x_1-x_3)\,,\nonumber \\
281: \kappa_2&=&M(x_2-x_1)(x_2-x_3)\,, \\
282: \kappa_3&=&M(x_3-x_1)(x_3-x_2)\,.\nonumber
283: \end{eqnarray}
284: %
285: The perturbation function $\phi$ is expanded around the black hole horizon as
286: %
287: \begin{equation}
288: \phi=(x-x_1)^{\rho_1}(x-x_2)^{-\rho_2}(x-x_3)^{-\rho_3}\sum_{n=0}^\infty
289: a_n\left({x-x_1\over x_2-x_1}\right)^n\,,
290: \label{expansion}
291: \end{equation}
292: %
293: where $a_0=1$ and $a_n$'s for $n\ge 1$ are determined by the three term recurrence
294: relation, given by
295: %
296: \begin{equation}
297: \alpha_na_{n+1}+\beta_na_n+\gamma_na_{n-1}=0\,,
298: \end{equation}
299: %
300: where
301: %
302: \begin{eqnarray}
303: \alpha_n&=&2M(x_1-x_3)\{n^2+2(\rho_1+1)n+2\rho_1+1\}\,,\\
304: \beta_n&=&-2M(2x_1-x_2-x_3)\times\nonumber\\
305: &&\{n^2+(4\rho_1+1)n+4\rho_1^2+2\rho_1\}-l(l+1)\nonumber\\
306: &&+2Mx_1(s^2-1)\,,\\
307: \gamma_n&=&2M(x_1-x_2)(n^2+4\rho_1n+4\rho_1^2-s^2)\,.
308: \end{eqnarray}
309: %
310: Here, $s=2$ for the gravitational perturbations and $s=1$ for the electromagnetic
311: perturbations. Note that in the present study, we do not consider the scalar
312: perturbations because Leaver's method cannot be directly applied to the scalar case.
313: Comparing the expanded eigenfunction (\ref{expansion}) with equation (\ref{expwr}),
314: we can see that the eigenfunction (\ref{expansion}) satisfies the QNM
315: boundary condition (\ref{def-bc}) if the power series in equation (\ref{expansion})
316: converges for $x_2\le x\le x_1$. This convergence condition is equivalent to the
317: condition written in terms of continued fractions \cite{gautschi}, which is given by
318: %
319: \begin{eqnarray}
320: 0=\beta_0-{\alpha_0\gamma_1\over\beta_1-}{\alpha_1\gamma_2\over\beta_2-}\cdots
321: \label{a-eq1}
322: \end{eqnarray}
323: %
324: Therefore, we solve this algebraic equation to obtain the quasinormal frequency.
325:
326:
327: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
328: \section{Numerical Results}
329: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
330: In this study, we are concerned with asymptotic behaviors of high-order QNMs,
331: namely quasinormal frequencies with large imaginary parts, in almost the
332: extremal limit, in which two horizons are quite near. We therefore consider only the
333: case of $r_1\kappa_1\le 10^{-2}$. For these small values of $r_1\kappa_1$, the continued
334: fractions (\ref{a-eq1}) converge very quickly and Leaver's method works quite well even
335: when quasinormal frequencies have quite large imaginary parts.
336: Note that for moderate values of $r_1\kappa_1$, however, the convergence of the continued
337: fractions gets worse and Leaver's method is applicable only for modes with smaller imaginary
338: frequencies. For those cases, thus, some other techniques such as Nollert's method \cite{nollert}
339: or a phase integral method \cite{andersson} should be used to obtain high-order QNMs.
340:
341:
342: In order to check our numerical code, we have calculated fundamental frequencies of
343: the QNMs for several values of $r_1\kappa_1$ and have fitted the mode
344: frequencies as a function of $r_1\kappa_1$ with the polynomials defined by
345: %
346: \begin{eqnarray}
347: {\rm Re}(\omega r_1)&=&r_1\kappa_1 b_0(1-b_1r_1\kappa_1)\,,\nonumber \\
348: {\rm Im}(\omega r_1)&=&r_1\kappa_1 c_0(1-c_1r_1\kappa_1)\,.
349: \label{w-exp}
350: \end{eqnarray}
351: %
352: Recently, Cardoso and Lemos \cite{cardoso03} and Maasse van den Brink \cite{brink}
353: analytically obtained the expansion coefficients, which are given by
354: %
355: \begin{equation}
356: b_0=\left\{
357: \begin{array}{ll}
358: \sqrt{l(l+1)-{1\over 4}}&{\rm for\ } s=0,\ 1\\
359: \sqrt{l(l+1)-{9\over 4}}&{\rm for\ } s=2 \,,
360: \end{array}
361: \right.
362: \label{ana-coef1}
363: \end{equation}
364: %
365: \begin{equation}
366: c_0=n+{1\over 2}\,,\quad b_1=c_1={2\over 3}\,,
367: \label{ana-coef2}
368: \end{equation}
369: %
370: where $n$ is the mode number. It is found that numerically obtained coefficients are
371: in good agreement with coefficients given by (\ref{ana-coef1}) and (\ref{ana-coef2}).
372: Note that our numerical results for the mode frequencies are consistent with those
373: obtained by Moss and Norman \cite{moss}, who studied low-order QNMs
374: of the gravitational perturbations for full range of the parameter $r_1\kappa_1$.
375:
376:
377: First, let us discuss properties of the quasinormal frequencies for the low-order
378: modes. In Figure 1, we show the
379: real parts of the frequencies for the low-order QNMs versus the imaginary
380: parts of the frequencies for the gravitational perturbations with $l=2$. In this figure,
381: non-dimensional frequencies ${\rm Re}(\omega/\kappa_1)$ have been plotted as a function of
382: ${\rm Im}(\omega/\kappa_1)$ for $r_1\kappa_1=10^{-3}$ and $r_1\kappa_1=5\times 10^{-3}$,
383: and the dashed curve indicates the approximate frequency for $r_1\kappa_1\rightarrow 0$,
384: derived by Cardoso and Lemos \cite{cardoso03} (see, also \cite{brink}). For low-order modes,
385: Figure 1 illustrates how the frequencies of the QNMs behaves when the mode number and/or
386: the value of $r_1\kappa_1$ is altered. Basic properties of the low-order QNMs
387: are summarized as follows: For the modes associated with a small mode number, the real parts of
388: the frequencies decrease with the increase of the imaginary parts of the frequency, even though
389: the real parts of the frequency are constant in the approximation formula
390: (\ref{w-exp})-(\ref{ana-coef2}). In other words, the
391: analytical approximation formula in the extremal limit (\ref{w-exp})-(\ref{ana-coef2}) is quite
392: good for the fundamental modes as long as $r_1\kappa_1$ is small enough, while, as expected in
393: \cite{brink}, this approximation formula gets worse as the mode number is increased even for
394: small values of $r_1\kappa_1$. This means that formula
395: (\ref{w-exp})-(\ref{ana-coef2})
396: does not give a correct asymptotic value of the QNM frequencies in the limit of large imaginary
397: frequencies. Similar properties can be seen for other perturbations
398: having different $s$ and $l$. In Figure 2, we show the same results as those in
399: Figure 1 but for the electromagnetic perturbations having $l=1$. It is observed
400: that similar behaviors of the QNM frequencies are seen in the case of electromagnetic
401: perturbations, too.
402:
403:
404: Now, we explain our numerical results for the asymptotic behavior of the QNM
405: of nearly extremal SdS spacetimes in the limit of large imaginary
406: frequencies.
407: In Figure 3, we plot the imaginary parts of the non-dimensional
408: QNM frequencies, $\omega/\kappa_1$, of the gravitational perturbations
409: with $l=2$ as a function of the mode number $n$.
410: In this figure, the model parameter is $r_1\kappa_1=10^{-3}$.
411: The figure shows that an asymptotic form of ${\rm Im}(\omega/\kappa_1)\sim
412: n$,
413: which is similar to the analytical
414: formula (\ref{w-exp})-(\ref{ana-coef2}), is a good approximation for the imaginary
415: parts in the limit of large imaginary frequencies.
416: The same asymptotic form is inferred in all other QNM's
417: we have calculated in the present study,
418: regardless of the values of $r_1\kappa_1$, $l$, and $s$.
419:
420:
421: Let us next focus on the behaviors of the real part of the QNM
422: frequencies in the limit of highly damped modes.
423: In Figures 4 and 5, the real parts of the non-dimensional mode frequencies,
424: $\omega/\kappa_1$ are plotted
425: as a function of the imaginary parts of the frequencies up to
426: sufficiently high-order modes for the $l=2,\ 3$ gravitational and
427: for the $l=1,\ 2$ electromagnetic perturbations, respectively.
428: The results for the model parameter of $r_1\kappa_1=10^{-3}$ are shown
429: in both figures. It is found that the real parts of the frequencies show
430: oscillating behaviors as the imaginary parts of the frequencies are increased.
431: It is important to note that similar oscillating behaviors have been
432: observed in the QNMs of a Reissner-Nordstr{\" o}m black hole. (The quasinormal
433: frequencies with large imaginary frequency of a Reissner-Nordstr{\" o}m black
434: hole can be given in terms of a solution of the algebraic equation
435: \cite{motl03,an03,andersson_howls},
436: %
437: \begin{equation}
438: e^{\beta\omega}+2+3e^{k^2\beta\omega}=0\,,
439: \label{rne}
440: \end{equation}
441: %
442: where $\beta$ and $k$ are contents determined with the mass and charge of the
443: black hole (see, \cite{motl03}). As shown by Neitzke \cite{an03} and Anderson
444: and Howls \cite{andersson_howls}, equation (\ref{rne}) has an infinite number
445: of solutions and some solutions of equation (\ref{rne}) show periodicity.)
446: The behavior of the amplitude of the oscillating
447: ${\rm Re}(\omega/\kappa_1)$ as a function of ${\rm Im}(\omega/\kappa_1)$
448: resembles that of QNM
449: frequencies of a Schwarzschild black hole. For the gravitational perturbations,
450: the amplitude decreases for small values of
451: ${\rm Im}(\omega/\kappa_1)$, approaches the imaginary axis of the complex
452: frequency plan, increases again, and finally approaches some constant value.
453: The asymptotic value of the amplitude in the limit
454: of highly damped modes seems to be non-zero constant, which is inferred as
455: $\sim 0.4$. Therefore the limit of ${\rm Re}(\omega/\kappa_1)$ as
456: ${\rm Im}(\omega/\kappa_1)\rightarrow\infty$ appears not to exist for the gravitational
457: perturbations. For the electromagnetic perturbations, on the other hand, the
458: amplitude of oscillating ${\rm Re}(\omega/\kappa_1)$ decreases monotonically as
459: ${\rm Im}(\omega/\kappa_1)$ is increased. Its asymptotic value in the limit of
460: highly damped modes seems to be zero. This means that for the electromagnetic
461: perturbations, the limit of ${\rm Re}(\omega/\kappa_1)$ as ${\rm Im}(\omega/\kappa_1)$
462: goes to infinity seems to exist and to be zero. It is important to note that in a
463: nearly extremal SdS black hole, the asymptotic behaviors of the quasinormal
464: frequencies in the
465: limit of highly damped modes are independent of the angular quantum number
466: $l$ of the perturbations. Although we do not show the results for other
467: values of $r_1\kappa_1$ and $l$, the asymptotic behavior of the QNM frequencies
468: is not highly dependent on these parameters.
469: %
470: In summary, our numerical results suggest that for the gravitational
471: perturbations, the real parts of the QNM frequencies of nearly extremal
472: SdS spacetimes do not go to any constant value in the limit of
473: large imaginary frequencies because they show oscillating behaviors in
474: the limit. For the electromagnetic perturbations, on the other hand,
475: the real parts of the QNM frequencies seem to go to zero in the limit
476: of large imaginary frequencies.
477:
478:
479: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
480: \section{Conclusions}
481: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
482: We have calculated the high-order QNMs with large imaginary frequencies
483: for the electromagnetic and gravitational perturbations in nearly
484: extremal SdS spacetimes using Leaver's continued
485: fraction method \cite{leaver}.
486: Our results show that for low-order QNMs, analytical formulas in
487: the extremal limit derived by Cardoso and Lemos \cite{cardoso03}
488: and Maassen van den Brink \cite{brink} is a quite good approximation
489: for the QNM frequencies as long as the model parameter $r_1\kappa_1$
490: is small enough.
491: For high-order QNMs, whose imaginary frequencies are
492: sufficiently large, on the other hand, this formula becomes inaccurate
493: even for small values of $r_1\kappa_1$.
494: Therefore, the approximation derived by Cardoso and Lemos cannot give
495: correct asymptotic behaviors of the QNMs in the limit of large
496: imaginary frequencies (see, also \cite{brink}).
497: We also found that the real parts of the quasinormal frequencies
498: have oscillating behaviors in the limit of highly damped modes.
499: (Similar behaviors have been found in the quasinormal frequencies in a
500: Reissner-Nordstr{\" o}m black hole \cite{motl03,berti,an03,andersson_howls}.)
501: The amplitude of oscillating ${\rm Re(\omega)}$ approaches a non-zero
502: constant value for the gravitational perturbations and zero for the
503: electromagnetic perturbations in the limit of highly damped modes,
504: regardless of values of $l$ and $r_1\kappa_1$. This means that for the
505: gravitational perturbations, the real parts of the quasinormal frequencies
506: of nearly extremal SdS spacetimes appear not to go to any constant value
507: in the limit of highly damped modes. Therefore our numerical results suggest
508: that Hod's conjecture is not applicable for nearly extremal SdS black holes
509: because the the limit of ${\rm Re(\omega)}$ as
510: ${\rm Im}(\omega)\rightarrow\infty$ does not exist.
511:
512:
513: Although we computed high-order QNMs whose damping rates are quite large, all the QNMs
514: we obtained in this study are still associated with a finite mode number but not infinity,
515: because we investigated the properties of the QNMs with straightforward numerical approach.
516: Thus, we cannot exclude the possibility that our numerical results do not show correct
517: asymptotic behaviors.
518: Other approaches to examine asymptotic behaviors of QNMs in the highly damping
519: limit are necessary, in order to confirm our results of the asymptotic behaviors.
520: As for high-order QNMs with large imaginary frequencies for moderate values of
521: $r_1\kappa_1$, Leaver's method cannot be applied straightforwardly.
522: Therefore, other numerical techniques are needed to obtain QNMs with large imaginary
523: frequencies.
524:
525:
526: \begin{acknowledgments}
527: The authors are grateful to V. Cardoso for fruitful discussions and a
528: careful reading of the manuscript.
529: They are also grateful to J. Bekenstein for correspondence regarding
530: the early history of the black hole thermodynamics. S.Y.
531: acknowledges financial support from Funda\c c\~ao para a Ci\^encia e a
532: Tecnologia (FCT) through project SAPIENS 36280/99.
533: \end{acknowledgments}
534:
535:
536: \appendix*
537:
538: \section{Superpartner and iso-spectral relationship between axial and polar perturbations in
539: SdS spacetime}
540:
541: Non-radial gravitational perturbations of a SdS spacetime obey a Schr\"odinger-type wave
542: equation, given by
543: %
544: \begin{equation}
545: {d^2\phi^{(\pm)}\over dr_*^2}+[\omega^2-V^{(\pm)}(r)]\phi^{(\pm)}=0\,,
546: \label{a1}
547: \end{equation}
548: %
549: where $\phi^{(+)}$ and $V^{(+)}$ ($\phi^{(-)}$ and $V^{(-)}$) are the gauge invariant perturbation
550: function and the effective potential for polar (axial) parity perturbations, respectively.
551: The effective potentials are given by
552: %
553: \begin{eqnarray}
554: V^{(+)}&=&{2\Delta\over r^5(cr+3M)^2}\nonumber\\
555: &\times&[9M^3+9M^2cr+3c^2Mr^2\nonumber\\
556: &&\ \ +c^2(c+1)r^3-3M^2\Lambda r^3]\,,
557: \label{a2}
558: \end{eqnarray}
559: %
560: \begin{eqnarray}
561: V^{(-)}={2\Delta\over r^5}\,[(c+1)r-6M]\,,
562: \label{a3}
563: \end{eqnarray}
564: %
565: where $c=(l+2)(l-1)/2$ (for detailed derivations of the master equation (\ref{a1}), see, e.g.,
566: \cite{mm90,cl01}). As shown first by Cardoso and Lemos \cite{cl01}, two potentials $V^{(+)}$
567: and $V^{(-)}$ are simply related through the relation, given by
568: %
569: \begin{eqnarray}
570: V^{(\pm)}=\pm\beta {df\over dr_*}+\beta^2 f^2+\kappa f\,,
571: \label{a4}
572: \end{eqnarray}
573: %
574: where $\beta=6M$, $\kappa=4c(c+1)$, and
575: %
576: \begin{equation}
577: f={\Delta\over 2r^3(cr+3M)}\,.
578: \label{a5}
579: \end{equation}
580: %
581: This relation between two potentials are called the superpartner relationship.
582: By virtue of the superpartner relationship, the perturbation function $\phi^{(+)}$
583: ($\phi^{(-)}$) can be written in term of $\phi^{(-)}$ ($\phi^{(+)}$) and its first
584: derivative \cite{ch83}, given by
585: %
586: \begin{eqnarray}
587: (\kappa\pm 2i\omega\beta)\phi^{(\pm)}=(\kappa+2\beta^2f)\,\phi^{(\mp)}\pm2\beta\,
588: {d\phi^{(\mp)}\over dr_*}\,.
589: \label{a6}
590: \end{eqnarray}
591: %
592: It is worthwhile to note that the superpartner relationship (\ref{a4}) and (\ref{a5}) and
593: the relations between two functions $\phi^{\pm}$ (\ref{a6}) in a SdS spacetime have the same
594: functional form as those in a Schwarzschild spacetime except for the definition of the
595: function $\Delta$ \cite{ch83}. Since $\Delta=\Lambda(r-r_1)(r_2-r)(r-r_3)r/3$, the
596: asymptotic form of the function $f$ in the limit of $r_*\rightarrow\pm\infty$ is
597: given by
598: %
599: \begin{equation}
600: f\rightarrow\left\{
601: \begin{array}{ll}
602: {\Lambda(r_2-r_1)(r_1-r_3)\over 6r_1^2(cr_1+3M)}\,e^{2|\kappa_1|r_*}&
603: {\rm as}\ r_*\rightarrow -\infty\\
604: {\Lambda(r_2-r_1)(r_2-r_3)\over 6r_2^2(cr_2+3M)}\,e^{-2|\kappa_2|r_*}&
605: {\rm as}\ r_*\rightarrow\infty\,.
606: \end{array}
607: \right.
608: \end{equation}
609: %
610: Then, it is easy to see that the function $f$ has three properties; i) smooth for
611: $-\infty< r_*< \infty$, ii) $f$ and its derivatives of all orders vanish as
612: $r_*\rightarrow\pm\infty$, iii) an integral $\int^\infty_{-\infty}fdr_*$ exists.
613: If the function $f$ appearing in (\ref{a4}) satisfies three conditions above, as shown in
614: \cite{ch83}, two potentials $V^{(\pm)}$ give the same transmission amplitude and the
615: same quasinormal frequencies. In a SdS spacetime, therefore, axial and polar perturbations
616: yield the same set of quasinormal mode frequencies. This iso-spectral properties in a SdS
617: spacetime is attributed to the fact that gravitational perturbations associated with
618: a spin $s=-2$ in a SdS spacetime can be described with a single Weyl scalar $\Psi_4$
619: \cite{of91}.
620:
621:
622:
623: In a Schwarzschild-anti-de Sitter spacetime, exactly the same relations between polar
624: and axial perturbations (\ref{a4})--(\ref{a6}) obviously hold \cite{cl01}. Yet,
625: there is no iso-spectral property between polar and axial perturbations in a
626: Schwarzschild-anti-de Sitter spacetime. In a Schwarzschild-anti-de Sitter spacetime,
627: the master equation (\ref{a1}) does not
628: have an asymptotic solution given by $e^{\pm i\omega r_*}$ as $r\rightarrow\infty$
629: and, furthermore, $r_*$ has a finite range. The boundary condition at spatial
630: infinity therefore must be modified. One of the plausible boundary conditions is
631: that perturbation functions vanish at spatial infinity, even though there are other
632: options for the boundary conditions \cite{cl01}. If this boundary condition is taken
633: at spatial infinity, in general, the transformation (\ref{a6}) between polar and
634: axial perturbations cannot hold this boundary condition. Therefore, the set of the
635: quasinormal frequencies of polar perturbations in a Schwarzschild-anti-de Sitter
636: spacetime is not the same as that of axial perturbations.
637:
638:
639:
640:
641: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
642: %
643: \bibitem{vish} C. V. Vishveshwara, Nature {\bf 227}, 936 (1970).
644: %
645: \bibitem{kokkotas99} K. D. Kokkotas and B. G. Schmidt,
646: Living Rev. Relativity {\bf 2}, 2 (1999).
647: %
648: \bibitem{nollert99} H. P. Nollert,
649: Class. Quant. Grav. {\bf 16}, R159 (1999).
650: %
651: \bibitem{MB95} J. D. Bekenstein and V. F. Mukhanov, Phys. Lett {\bf B 360},
652: 7 (1995).
653: %
654: \bibitem{B97} J. D. Bekenstein, in {\it Proceedings of the Eight Marcel
655: Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity}, eds. T. Piran and R. Ruffini
656: (World Scientific, Singapore 1999), pp. 92-111.
657: %
658: \bibitem{hod} S. Hod, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 81}, 4293 (1998).
659: %
660: \bibitem{dreyer} O. Dreyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 90}, 081301 (2003).
661: %
662: \bibitem{motl} L. Motl, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. {\bf 6}, 1135 (2003).
663: %
664: \bibitem{nollert} H.-P. Nollert, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 47}, 5253 (1993).
665: %
666: \bibitem{motl03} L. Motl and A. Neitzke, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. {\bf 7},
667: 307 (2003).
668: %
669: \bibitem{berti} E. Berti and K. D. Kokkotas, Phys. Rev. {\bf D} 68,
670: 044027 (2003).
671: %
672: \bibitem{an03} A. Neitzke, preprint (hep-th/0304080)
673: %
674: \bibitem{andersson_howls} N. Andersson and C. J. Howls,
675: preprint (gr-qc/0307020).
676: %
677: \bibitem{bertietal}E. Berti, V. Cardoso, K. D. Kokkotas, and
678: H. Onozawa, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 68}, 124018 (2003).
679: %
680: \bibitem{hod03} S. Hod, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 67}, 081501 (2003).
681: %
682: \bibitem{cardoso03} V. Cardoso and J. P. S. Lemos, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 67},
683: 084020 (2003).
684: %
685: \bibitem{brink} A. Maassen van den Brink, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 68},
686: 047501 (2003).
687: %
688: \bibitem{K02} R. A. Konoplya, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 66}, 044009 (2002).
689: %
690: \bibitem{CKL03} V. Cardoso, R. A. Konoplya, and J. P. S. Lemos,
691: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 68}, 044024 (2003).
692: %
693: \bibitem{leaver} E. W. Leaver,
694: Proc. R. Soc. London {\bf A402}, 285 (1985).
695: %
696: \bibitem{moss} I. G. Moss and J. P. Norman,
697: Class. Quant. Grav. {\bf 19}, 2323 (2002).
698: %
699: \bibitem{mm90}
700: F. Mellor and I. Moss, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 41}, 403 (1990);
701: %
702: \bibitem{of91}
703: H. Otsuki and T. Futamase, Prog. Theor. Phys. {\bf 85}, 771 (1991);
704: %
705: \bibitem{cl01}
706: V. Cardoso and J. P. S. Lemos, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 64}, 084017 (2001).
707: %
708: \bibitem{gautschi} W. Gautschi, SIAM Rev. {\bf 9}, 24 (1967).
709: %
710: \bibitem{andersson} N. Andersson,
711: Proc. R. Soc. London {\bf A439}, 47 (1992).
712: %
713: \bibitem{cly03} V. Cardoso, J. P. S. Lemos, and S. Yoshida, Phys.
714: Rev. D, in press (gr-qc/0309112); V. Cardoso, J. P. S. Lemos, and S.
715: Yoshida, JHEP {\bf 0312}, 041 (2003).
716: %
717: \bibitem{db03} D. Birmingham, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 569}, 199 (2003).
718: %
719: \bibitem{ch83}
720: S. Chandrasekhar, {\it The Mathematical Theory of Black holes}
721: (Oxford University, New York, 1983).
722: \end{thebibliography}
723:
724: %\newpage
725:
726: %Figures
727:
728: \begin{figure}[ht]
729: \centering
730: \includegraphics[height=5cm,clip]{f1.eps}
731: \caption{Real parts of the non-dimensional QNM frequencies, $\omega/\kappa_1$,
732: given as a function of the imaginary parts of the frequencies for the l=2
733: gravitational perturbations. The model parameters $r_1\kappa_1$ are taken to be
734: $r_1\kappa_1=10^{-3}$ and $r_1\kappa_1=5\times 10^{-3}$. The frequencies
735: obtained with the approximation formula in the limit of $r_1\kappa_1\rightarrow 0$
736: are also shown as the dashed curve.}
737: \end{figure}
738: %
739: \begin{figure}[ht]
740: \centering
741: \includegraphics[height=5cm,clip]{f2.eps}
742: \caption{Same as Figure 1 but for the $l=1$ electromagnetic perturbations.}
743: \end{figure}
744: %
745: \begin{figure}[ht]
746: \centering
747: \includegraphics[height=5cm,clip]{f3.eps}
748: \caption{Imaginary parts of the non-dimensional QNM frequencies, $\omega/\kappa_1$,
749: given as a function of the mode number, $n$, for the gravitational perturbations
750: associated with $l=2$. The model parameter $r_1\kappa_1$ is taken to be
751: $r_1\kappa_1=10^{-3}$.}
752: \end{figure}
753: %
754: \begin{figure}
755: \centering
756: \includegraphics[width=10cm]{f4.eps}
757: \includegraphics[width=10cm]{f5.eps}
758: \caption{Real parts of the non-dimensional QNM frequencies, $\omega/\kappa_1$,
759: given as a function of the imaginary parts of the frequencies for the
760: gravitational perturbations having $l=2$ and $l=3$. The frequencies of the QNMs
761: associated with different $l$, $l=2,\ 3$, are shown in each panel. The model
762: parameters $r_1\kappa_1$ is taken to be $r_1\kappa_1=10^{-3}$.}
763: \end{figure}
764: %
765: \begin{figure}
766: \centering
767: \includegraphics[width=10cm]{f6.eps}
768: \includegraphics[width=10cm]{f7.eps}
769: \caption{Same as Figure 3 but for the electromagnetic perturbations having
770: $l=1$ and $l=2$.}
771: \end{figure}
772: %
773:
774: \end{document}
775:
776:
777: