1:
2: \documentclass[aps,showpacs,preprintnumbers,nofootinbib, epsf]{revtex4}
3: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
4: \usepackage{graphicx}
5:
6: \begin{document}
7:
8: \preprint{gr-qc/0505034}
9: \title{Chaplygin gas dominated anisotropic brane world cosmological models}
10: \author{M. K. Mak}
11: \email{mkmak@vtc.edu.hk} \affiliation{Department of Physics, The
12: University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong}
13: \author{T. Harko}
14: \email{harko@hkucc.hku.hk} \affiliation{Department of Physics, The
15: University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong}
16: \date{\today}
17:
18: \begin{abstract}
19: We present exact solutions of the gravitational field equations in the
20: generalized Randall-Sundrum model for an anisotropic brane with Bianchi type
21: I geometry, with a generalized Chaplygin gas as matter source. The
22: generalized Chaplygin gas, which interpolates between a high density
23: relativistic era and a non-relativistic matter phase, is a popular dark
24: energy candidate. For a Bianchi type I space-time brane filled with a
25: cosmological fluid obeying the generalized Chaplygin equation of state the
26: general solution of the gravitational field equations can be expressed in an
27: exact parametric form, with the comoving volume taken as parameter. In the
28: limiting cases of a stiff cosmological fluid, with pressure equal to the
29: energy density, and for a pressureless fluid, the solution of the field
30: equations can be expressed in an exact analytical form. The evolution of the
31: scalar field associated to the Chaplygin fluid is also considered and the
32: corresponding potential is obtained. The behavior of the observationally
33: important parameters like shear, anisotropy and deceleration parameter is
34: considered in detail.
35: \end{abstract}
36:
37: \pacs{04.50.+h, 04.20.Jb, 04.20.Cv, 95.35.+d}
38: \maketitle
39:
40: %% REVTEX4
41:
42: %% REVTEX4
43:
44: \section{Introduction}
45:
46: The observations of high redshift supernovae \cite{Pe99} and the
47: Boomerang/Maxima data \cite{Ber00}, showing that the location of the first
48: acoustic peak in the power spectrum of the microwave background radiation is
49: consistent with the inflationary prediction $\Omega =1$, have provided
50: compelling evidence for a net equation of state of the cosmic fluid lying in
51: the range $-1\leq w=p/\rho <-1/3$. To explain these observations, two dark
52: components are invoked: the pressureless cold dark matter (CDM) and the dark
53: energy (DE) with negative pressure. CDM contributes $\Omega _{m}\sim 0.3$%
54: ,and is mainly motivated by the theoretical interpretation of the galactic
55: rotation curves and large scale structure formation. DE is assumed to
56: provide $\Omega _{DE}\sim 0.7$ and is responsible for the acceleration of
57: the distant type Ia supernovae. There are a huge number of candidates for DE
58: in the literature (for recent reviews see \cite{PeRa03} and \cite{Pa03}).
59: However, neither CDM nor DE has direct laboratory observational or
60: experimental evidence for its existence. It would be important if a unified
61: dark matter -dark energy scenario could be found, in which these two
62: components are different manifestations of a single fluid \cite{Paetal}.
63:
64: A candidate for such an unification is the so-called generalized
65: Chaplygin gas, which is an exotic fluid with the equation of state
66: $p=-B/\rho ^{\alpha }$, where $B$ and $\alpha $ are two parameters
67: to be determined. It was initially suggested by Kamenshchik,
68: Moschella and Pasquier \cite{Ka01} with $\alpha =1$, and then
69: generalized by Bento, Bertolami and Sen \cite{Be02} for the case
70: $\alpha \neq 1$. The Chaplygin gas also appears in the
71: stabilization of branes in
72: Schwarzschild-AdS black hole bulks as a critical theory at the horizon \cite%
73: {Ka00} and in the stringy analysis of black holes in three dimensions \cite%
74: {Ka98}. The Chaplygin equation of state can also be derived from Born-Infeld
75: type Lagrangians \cite{Be02}, \cite{No05}. This simple and elegant model
76: smoothly interpolates between a non-relativistic matter phase ($p=0$) and a
77: negative-pressure dark energy dominated phase.
78:
79: The cosmological implications of the Chaplygin gas model have been
80: intensively investigated in the recent literature \cite{Chco}.
81:
82: The Chaplygin gas cosmological model has been constrained by using
83: different cosmological observations, like type Ia supernovae
84: \cite{Ber04}, \cite{Fa02}, the CMB
85: anisotropy measurements \cite{Be03}, gravitational lensing surveys \cite%
86: {De03}, the age measurement of high redshift objects \cite{Al03} and the
87: X-ray gas mass fraction of clusters \cite{Cu04}. The obtained results are
88: somewhat controversial, with some of them claiming good agreement between
89: the data and the Chaplygin gas model, while the rest ruling it as a feasible
90: candidate for dark matter. In particular, the standard Chaplygin gas model
91: with $\alpha =1$ is ruled out by the data at a 99\% level \cite{Cu04}.
92:
93: The embedding approach to gravity, according to which our
94: four-dimensional space-time is a three-brane, embedded in a
95: five-dimensional space-time (the bulk), has a long history,
96: beginning at least with the classic book by Eisenhart \cite{Ei}.
97: More recently, this idea was considered by Akama \cite{Ak83} and
98: Rubakov and Shaposhnikov \cite{RuSh83} (an exhaustive list of
99: references on the early articles published in this field can be
100: found in Bandos and Kummer \cite{BaKu99} and Pavsic and Tapia
101: \cite{PaTa00}, respectively). Recently, due to the proposal by
102: Randall and Sundrum \cite{RS99a} the idea of the embedding of our
103: Universe in a higher dimensional space had attracted again a
104: considerable interest. According to the brane-world scenario, the
105: physical fields (electromagnetic, Yang-Mills etc.) in our
106: four-dimensional Universe are confined to the three brane. These
107: fields are assumed to arise as fluctuations of branes in string
108: theories. Only gravity can freely propagate in both the brane and
109: bulk space-times, with the gravitational self-couplings not
110: significantly modified. This model originated from the study of a
111: single $3$-brane
112: embedded in five dimensions, with the $5D$ metric given by $%
113: ds^{2}=e^{-f(y)}\eta _{\mu \nu }dx^{\mu }dx^{\nu }+dy^{2}$, which, due to
114: the appearance of the warp factor, could produce a large hierarchy between
115: the scale of particle physics and gravity. Even if the fifth dimension is
116: uncompactified, standard $4D$ gravity is reproduced on the brane. Hence this
117: model allows the presence of large, or even infinite non-compact extra
118: dimensions. Our brane is identified to a domain wall in a $5$-dimensional
119: anti-de Sitter space-time. For a review of dynamics and geometry of brane
120: Universes see \cite{Ma01}.
121:
122: Due to the correction terms coming from the extra dimensions, significant
123: deviations from the Einstein theory occur in brane world models at very high
124: energies \cite{SMS00}. Gravity is largely modified at the electro-weak scale
125: $1$ TeV. The cosmological implications of the brane world theories have been
126: extensively investigated in the physical literature \cite{all}.
127: Gravitational collapse can also produce high energies, with the five
128: dimensional effects playing an important role in the formation of black
129: holes \cite{all1}.
130:
131: The possibility that the non-local effects, generated by the free
132: gravitational field of the bulk in a conformally symmetric brane, may
133: provide an explanation for the dynamics of the neutral hydrogen clouds at
134: large distances from the galactic center, and hence provide a purely
135: gravitational explanation for the existence of dark matter, was suggested in %
136: \cite{MaHa04}.
137:
138: The behavior and the properties of the anisotropic Bianchi type I
139: brane-world for different type of matter sources, including inflationary
140: scalar fields, have been intensively investigated in the framework of the
141: brane world cosmologies \cite{MSS00}. The study of anisotropic homogeneous
142: brane world cosmological models have shown an important difference between
143: these models and standard four-dimensional general relativity, namely, that
144: brane Universes are born in an isotropic state. For Bianchi type I and V
145: geometries this type of behavior has been found both by exactly solving the
146: gravitational field equations \cite{ChHaMa01a}, or from the qualitative
147: analysis of the model \cite{CS201}. A general analysis of the anisotropy in
148: spatially homogeneous brane world cosmological models has been performed by
149: Coley \cite{Co01a}, who has shown that the initial singularity is isotropic,
150: and hence the initial conditions problem is naturally solved. Consequently,
151: close to the initial singularity, these models do not exhibit Mixmaster or
152: chaotic-like behavior \cite{Co01b}. Based on the results of the study of
153: homogeneous anisotropic cosmological models Coley conjectured that the
154: isotropic singularity could be a general feature of brane cosmology. The
155: analytic study of the values of the anisotropy in the limit of small times
156: shows that for all Bianchi type space-times filled with a non-zero pressure
157: cosmological fluid, obeying a barotropic equation of state, the initial
158: singular state on the brane is isotropic \cite{HaMa04a}. This result is
159: obtained by assuming that in the limit of small times the asymptotic
160: behavior of the scale factors is of Kasner-type. For brane worlds filled
161: with dust or with a scalar field, the initial value of the anisotropy
162: coincides in both brane world and standard four-dimensional general
163: relativistic cosmologies.
164:
165: It is the purpose of this paper to investigate some classes of exact
166: solutions of the gravitational field equations in the brane world model for
167: the anisotropic Bianchi type I geometry, by assuming that the matter source
168: on the brane consist of a generalized Chaplygin gas. In this case the
169: general solution of the field equations can be obtained in an exact
170: parametric form, for arbitrary values of the parameters characterizing the
171: equation of state of the matter. The inclusion of the quadratic terms in the
172: energy-momentum tensor of the perfect cosmological fluids leads to major
173: changes in the early dynamics of the anisotropic Universe, as compared to
174: the standard general relativistic case. We also consider the brane dynamics
175: of the scalar field associated to the Chaplygin case and obtain the
176: corresponding self-interaction potential. The behavior of the
177: observationally important physical quantities like anisotropy, shear and
178: deceleration parameters is considered in detail for all these models.
179:
180: The present paper is organized as follows. The gravitational field equations
181: for a Chaplygin gas on a brane with an anisotropic Bianchi type I geometry
182: are written down in Section II. In Section III we present the general
183: solution of the field equations. In Section III we discuss and conclude our
184: results.
185:
186: \section{Geometry, matter and field equations on the brane}
187:
188: In the $5D$ space-time the brane-world is located as $Y(X^{I})=0$, where $%
189: X^{I},\,I=0,1,2,3,4$ are $5$-dimensional coordinates. The effective action
190: in five dimensions is \cite{MW00}
191: \begin{equation}
192: S=\int d^{5}X\sqrt{-g_{5}}\left( \frac{1}{2k_{5}^{2}}R_{5}-\Lambda
193: _{5}\right) +\int_{Y=0}d^{4}x\sqrt{-g}\left( \frac{1}{k_{5}^{2}}K^{\pm
194: }-\lambda +L^{\text{matter}}\right) ,
195: \end{equation}
196: where $k_{5}^{2}=8\pi G_{5}$ is the $5$-dimensional gravitational coupling
197: constant, $\Lambda _5$ is the vacuum energy in the bulk, $\lambda $ is the
198: vacuum energy on the brane and where $x^{\mu },\,\mu =0,1,2,3$ are the
199: induced $4$-dimensional brane world coordinates. $R_{5}$ is the $5D$
200: intrinsic curvature in the bulk and $K^{\pm }$ is the intrinsic curvature on
201: either side of the brane.
202:
203: On the $5$-dimensional space-time (the bulk), with the negative vacuum
204: energy $\Lambda _5$ and brane energy-momentum as source of the gravitational
205: field, the Einstein field equations are given by
206: \begin{equation}
207: G_{IJ} = k_5^2 T_{IJ}, \qquad T_{IJ} = -\Lambda_5 g_{IJ} + \delta(Y) \left[
208: -\lambda g_{IJ} + T_{IJ}^{\text{matter}} \right],
209: \end{equation}
210: In this space-time a brane is a fixed point of the $Z_2$ symmetry. In the
211: following capital Latin indices run in the range $0,...,4$ while Greek
212: indices take the values $0,...,3$.
213:
214: Assuming a metric of the form $ds^{2}=(n_{I}n_{J}+g_{IJ})dx^{I}dx^{J}$, with
215: $n_{I}dx^{I}=d\chi $ the unit normal to the $\chi =\text{const.}$
216: hypersurfaces and $g_{IJ}$ the induced metric on $\chi =\text{const.}$
217: hypersurfaces, the effective four-dimensional gravitational equations on the
218: brane (which are the consequence of the Gauss-Codazzi equations) take the
219: form \cite{SMS00}:
220: \begin{equation} \label{Ein}
221: G_{\mu \nu }=-\Lambda g_{\mu \nu }+k_{4}^{2}T_{\mu \nu }+k_{5}^{4}S_{\mu \nu
222: }-E_{\mu \nu },
223: \end{equation}
224: where $S_{\mu \nu }$ is the local quadratic energy-momentum correction
225: \begin{equation}
226: S_{\mu \nu }=\frac{1}{12}TT_{\mu \nu }-\frac{1}{4}T_{\mu }{}^{\alpha }T_{\nu
227: \alpha }+\frac{1}{24}g_{\mu \nu }\left( 3T^{\alpha \beta }T_{\alpha \beta
228: }-T^{2}\right) ,
229: \end{equation}
230: and $E_{\mu \nu }$ is the nonlocal effect from the bulk free gravitational
231: filed, transmitted projection of the bulk Weyl tensor $C_{IAJB}$
232: \begin{equation}
233: E_{IJ}=C_{IAJB}n^{A}n^{B},\qquad E_{IJ}\rightarrow E_{\mu \nu }\delta
234: _{I}^{\mu }\delta _{J}^{\nu }\quad \text{as}\quad \chi \rightarrow 0.
235: \end{equation}
236:
237: The four-dimensional cosmological constant, $\Lambda $, and the coupling
238: constant, $k_{4}$, are given by
239: \begin{equation}
240: \Lambda =\frac{k_{5}^{2}}{2}\left( \Lambda _{5}+\frac{k_{5}^{2}\lambda ^{2}}{%
241: 6}\right) ,\qquad k_{4}^{2}=\frac{k_{5}^{4}\lambda }{6}.
242: \end{equation}
243:
244: The Einstein equation in the bulk, Codazzi equation, also implies the
245: conservation of the energy momentum tensor of the matter on the brane,
246: \begin{equation}
247: D_{\nu }T_{\mu }{}^{\nu }=0. \label{DT}
248: \end{equation}
249:
250: Moreover, the contracted Bianchi identities on the brane imply that the
251: projected Weyl tensor should obey the constraint
252: \begin{equation}
253: D_{\nu }E_{\mu }{}^{\nu }=k_{5}^{4}D_{\nu }S_{\mu }{}^{\nu }. \label{DE}
254: \end{equation}
255:
256: Finally, the equations (\ref{Ein}), (\ref{DT}) and (\ref{DE}) give the
257: complete set field equations for the brane gravitational field.
258:
259: For any matter fields (scalar field, perfect fluids, kinetic
260: gases, dissipative fluids etc.) the general form of the brane
261: energy-momentum tensor can be covariantly given as \cite{Ma01}
262: \begin{equation}
263: T_{\mu\nu} = \rho u_\mu u_\nu + p h_{\mu\nu} + \pi_{\mu\nu} + 2 q_{(\mu}
264: u_{\nu)}. \label{EMT}
265: \end{equation}
266:
267: The decomposition is irreducible for any chosen $4$-velocity $u^\mu$. Here $%
268: \rho$ and $p$ are the energy density and isotropic pressure, and $%
269: h_{\mu\nu}=g_{\mu\nu}+u_\mu u_\nu$ projects orthogonal to $u^\mu$.
270:
271: The energy flux obeys the relation $q_\mu=q_{<\mu>}$, and the anisotropic
272: stress obeys $\pi_{\mu\nu}=\pi_{<\mu\nu>}$, where angular brackets denote
273: the projected, symmetric and trace-free part:
274: \begin{equation}
275: V_{<\mu>} = h_\mu{}^\nu V_\nu, \qquad W_{<\mu\nu>} = \left[
276: h_{(\mu}{}^\alpha h_{\nu)}{}^\beta - \frac13 h^{\alpha\beta} h_{\mu\nu} %
277: \right] W_{\alpha\beta}.
278: \end{equation}
279:
280: The symmetry properties of $E_{\mu\nu}$ imply that in general we
281: can decompose it irreducibly with respect to a chosen $4$-velocity
282: field $u^\mu$ as \cite{Ma01}
283: \begin{equation}
284: E_{\mu\nu} = -k^4 \left[ \mathcal{U} \left( u_\mu u_\nu + \frac13
285: h_{\mu\nu}\right) + \mathcal{P}_{\mu\nu} + 2\mathcal{Q}_{(\mu} u_{\nu)} %
286: \right], \label{WT}
287: \end{equation}
288: where $k=k_{5}/k_{4}$, $\mathcal{U}$ is a scalar,
289: $\mathcal{Q}_{\mu }$ a spatial vector and $\mathcal{P}_{\mu \nu }$
290: a spatial, symmetric and
291: trace-free tensor. For homogeneous models $\mathcal{Q}_{\mu }=0$ and $%
292: \mathcal{P}_{\mu \nu }=0$ \cite{CS201}. Hence the only non-zero
293: contribution from the 5-dimensional Weyl tensor from the bulk is
294: given by the scalar or ''dark radiation'' term $\mathcal{U}$.
295:
296: We consider that in Eq. (\ref{EMT}) the heat transfer is zero,
297: $q_{\mu }=0$ and we also neglect the effect of the possible
298: anisotropic stresses (viscosity of the cosmological fluid,
299: magnetic fields etc.) on the dynamics of the Universe. This allows
300: to assume that the cosmological fluid on the brane is perfect,
301: without dissipative effects. Then the matter correction terms are
302: given by
303: \begin{equation}
304: S_{\mu \nu }=\frac{1}{12}\rho ^{2}u_{\mu }u_{\nu }+\frac{1}{12}\rho (\rho
305: +2p)h_{\mu \nu }.
306: \end{equation}
307:
308: The line element of a Bianchi type I space-time, which generalizes
309: the flat Friedmann-Robertson-Walker metric to the anisotropic
310: case, is given by
311: \begin{equation}
312: ds^{2}=-dt^{2}+a_{1}^{2}\left( t\right) dx^{2}+a_{2}^{2}\left( t\right)
313: dy^{2}+a_{3}^{2}\left( t\right) dz^{2}. \label{5}
314: \end{equation}
315:
316: We define the following variable:
317: \begin{equation} \label{v}
318: V=\prod_{i=1}^{3}a_{i},
319: \end{equation}
320: \begin{equation} \label{6}
321: H=\frac{1}{3}\sum_{i=1}^{3}H_{i},
322: \end{equation}
323: \begin{equation} \label{7}
324: H_{i}=\frac{\dot{a}_{i}}{a_{i}},i=1,2,3,
325: \end{equation}
326: \begin{equation} \label{hi}
327: \Delta H_{i}=H_{i}-H, i=1,2,3.
328: \end{equation}
329:
330: In equations (\ref{v})-(\ref{hi}) $V$ is the volume scale factor, $%
331: H_{i},i=1,2,3$ are the directional Hubble parameters and $H$ is the mean
332: Hubble parameter. From Eqs. (\ref{v}) and (\ref{7}) we obtain the important
333: relation $H=\dot{V}/3V$.
334:
335: The physical quantities of observational interest in cosmology are the
336: expansion scalar $\theta $, the mean anisotropy parameter $A$ and the shear
337: scalar $\sigma ^{2}$, and are defined according to
338: \begin{equation}
339: \theta =3H,
340: \end{equation}
341: \begin{equation}
342: A=\frac{1}{3}\sum_{i=1}^{3}\left( \frac{\Delta H_{i}}{H}\right) ^{2},
343: \end{equation}
344: \begin{equation}
345: \sigma ^{2}=\frac{1}{2}\sigma _{ik}\sigma ^{ik}=\frac{1}{2}%
346: \sum_{i=1}^{3}H_{i}^{2}-3H^{2}=\frac{3}{2}AH^{2}. \label{10}
347: \end{equation}
348:
349: An important observational quantity is the deceleration parameter
350: \begin{equation}
351: q=\frac{d}{dt}\left( \frac{1}{H}\right) -1.
352: \end{equation}
353:
354: The sign of the deceleration parameter indicates whether the model inflates
355: or not. The positive sign of $q$ corresponds to ``standard'' decelerating
356: models whereas the negative sign indicates inflation.
357:
358: We assume that the isotropic pressure $p$ of the cosmological
359: fluid on the brane obeys a modified Chaplygin gas equation of
360: state \cite{De04},
361: \begin{equation}
362: p=\gamma \rho -\frac{B}{\rho ^{\alpha }}, \label{chap}
363: \end{equation}%
364: where $0\leq \gamma \leq 1$ and $0\leq \alpha \leq 1$. $B$ is a positive
365: constant.
366:
367: When $\gamma =1/3$ and the comoving volume of the Universe is
368: small ($\rho \rightarrow \infty$), this equation of state
369: corresponds to a radiation dominated era. The main reason for the
370: use of the modified Chaplygin gas equation of state is that it can
371: also describe the very high density ($\gamma =1$) and the
372: radiation dominated phase in the evolution of the Universe. When
373: the density is small, $\rho \rightarrow 0$, the equation of state
374: corresponds to a cosmological fluid with negative pressure (the
375: dark energy). In this limit, the modified Chaplygin equation of
376: state corresponds to a mixture of cold dark matter and dark energy
377: \cite{Be02}. At all stages it shows a mixture of dark energy, dark
378: matter and radiation. For $\rho =\left(B/\gamma \right)^{1/(\alpha
379: +1)}$ the matter content is pure dust with $p=0$. In the following
380: we neglect the effect of baryonic (luminous) matter on the
381: dynamics of the Universe, which, in a rigorous approach, should be
382: added separately to the equation of state of the cosmological
383: matter. But since the baryonic matter represents only $4-5\%$ from
384: the total amount of energy-matter in the Universe \cite{PeRa03},
385: \cite{Pa03}, its effect on the large scale cosmological dynamics
386: can be ignored.
387:
388: The speed of sound $v_s^2=\partial p/\partial \rho $ in the
389: Chaplygin gas is given by
390: \begin{equation}
391: v_s^2=\gamma (1+\alpha )-\frac{\alpha p}{\rho }.
392: \end{equation}
393:
394: Using the variables (\ref{v})-(\ref{hi}), the Einstein gravitational field
395: equations, the Bianchi identity and the evolution equation for the nonlocal
396: dark radiation take the form, respectively,
397: \begin{eqnarray}
398: 3\dot{H}+\sum_{i=1}^{3}H_{i}^{2} &=& \Lambda -\frac{k_{4}^{2}}{2}\left[
399: \left( 3\gamma +1\right) \rho -\frac{3B}{\rho ^{\alpha }}\right] -\frac{%
400: k_{4}^{2}}{2\lambda }\left[ \left( 3\gamma +2\right) \rho ^{2}-\frac{3B}{%
401: \rho ^{\alpha -1}}\right] -\frac{6\mathcal{U}}{k_{4}^{2}\lambda },
402: \label{dH} \\
403: \frac{1}{V}\frac{d}{dt}\left( VH_{i}\right) &=& \Lambda -\frac{k_{4}^{2}}{2}%
404: \left[ \left( \gamma -1\right) \rho -\frac{B}{\rho ^{\alpha }}\right] -\frac{%
405: k_{4}^{2}}{2\lambda }\left[ \gamma \rho ^{2}-\frac{B}{\rho ^{\alpha -1}}%
406: \right] +\frac{2\mathcal{U}}{k_{4}^{2}\lambda },i=1.2.3, \label{dVHi} \\
407: \dot{\rho}+3H\left( p+\rho \right) &=&0, \label{drho} \\
408: \dot{\mathcal{U}}+4H\mathcal{U} &=&0, \label{dU}
409: \end{eqnarray}
410:
411: Since we have assumed a homogeneous geometry, the effective
412: nonlocal energy density, $\mathcal{P} _{\mu \nu }$, and
413: $\mathcal{Q}_{\mu }$ vanish on the brane, $\mathcal{P} _{\mu \nu
414: }=0$ and $\mathcal{Q}_{\mu }=0$, respectively.
415:
416: \section{General solution of the field equations for the Bianchi type I brane%
417: }
418:
419: By using the equation of state of the cosmological matter given by Eq. (\ref%
420: {chap}), the energy conservation equation Eq. (\ref{drho}) can be
421: integrated exactly, thus giving the time evolution of the energy
422: density of the modified Chaplygin gas filled Bianchi type I brane
423: as
424: \begin{equation}
425: \rho =\left[ \frac{B}{1+\gamma }+\frac{C}{V^{\left( 1+\gamma \right) \left(
426: 1+\alpha \right) }}\right] ^{\frac{1}{1+\alpha }}. \label{d}
427: \end{equation}%
428: where $C$ is an arbitrary constant of integration.
429:
430: Integrating Eq. (\ref{dU}) yields
431: \begin{equation}
432: \mathcal{U=U}_{0}V^{-\frac{4}{3}},
433: \end{equation}
434: where $\mathcal{U}_{0}$ is an arbitrary constant of integration.
435:
436: By adding Eqs.(\ref{dVHi}) we find
437: \begin{equation}
438: \frac{1}{V}\frac{d}{dt}\left( VH\right) =\frac{\ddot{V}}{3V}= \Lambda -\frac{%
439: k_{4}^{2}}{2}\left[ \left( \gamma -1\right) \rho -\frac{B}{\rho ^{\alpha }}%
440: \right] -\frac{k_{4}^{2}}{2\lambda }\left[ \gamma \rho ^{2}-\frac{B}{\rho
441: ^{\alpha -1}}\right] +\frac{2\mathcal{U}}{k_{4}^{2}\lambda }, \label{19}
442: \end{equation}
443: or, by using the explicit dependence of the energy density on the comoving
444: volume $V$ and defining a new function $\ddot{V}=F\left( V\right) $, we can
445: rewrite Eq. (\ref{19}) in the form
446: \begin{eqnarray}
447: \ddot{V} &=&F\left( V\right) =3\Lambda V-\frac{3k_{4}^{2}}{2}V\left\{ \left(
448: \gamma -1\right) \left[ \frac{B}{1+\gamma }+\frac{C}{V^{\left( 1+\gamma
449: \right) \left( 1+\alpha \right) }}\right] ^{\frac{1}{1+\alpha }}-B\left[
450: \frac{B}{1+\gamma }+\frac{C}{V^{\left( 1+\gamma \right) \left( 1+\alpha
451: \right) }}\right] ^{-\frac{\alpha }{1+\alpha }}\right\} \nonumber \label{F}
452: \\
453: &&-\frac{3k_{4}^{2}}{2\lambda }V\left\{ \gamma \left[ \frac{B}{1+\gamma }+%
454: \frac{C}{V^{\left( 1+\gamma \right) \left( 1+\alpha \right) }}\right] ^{%
455: \frac{2}{1+\alpha }}-B\left[ \frac{B}{1+\gamma }+\frac{C}{V^{\left( 1+\gamma
456: \right) \left( 1+\alpha \right) }}\right] ^{\frac{1-\alpha }{1+\alpha }%
457: }\right\} +\frac{6\mathcal{U}_{0}}{k_{4}^{2}\lambda }V^{-\frac{1}{3}}.
458: \end{eqnarray}
459:
460: The general solution of Eq. (\ref{F}) is given by
461: \begin{equation}
462: t-t_{0}=\int \frac{dV}{\sqrt{2\int F\left( V\right) dV+C_{1}}}, \label{time}
463: \end{equation}
464: where $C_{1}$ and $t_{0}$ are arbitrary constant of integration.
465:
466: Subtracting Eq. (\ref{19}) from Eqs. (\ref{dVHi}) we obtain
467: \begin{equation}
468: H_{i}=H+\frac{K_{i}}{V},i=1,2,3, \label{20}
469: \end{equation}
470: with $K_{i},i=1,2,3$ constants of integration satisfying the consistency
471: condition $\sum_{i=1}^{3}K_{i}=0$. From Eq. (\ref{20}), it is easy to show
472: that
473: \begin{equation}
474: \sum_{i=1}^{3}H_{i}^{2}=3H^{2}+\frac{K^{2}}{V^{2}} \label{21}
475: \end{equation}
476: with $\sum_{i=1}^{3}K_{i}^{2}=K^{2}.$
477:
478: Therefore for a Bianchi type I induced brane geometry in the
479: presence of the modified Chaplygin gas the general solution of the
480: gravitational field equation can be expressed in the following
481: exact parametric form, with $V\geq 0$ taken as parameter:
482: \begin{equation}
483: \theta =\frac{\sqrt{2\int F\left( V\right) dV+C_{1}}}{V}, \label{theta}
484: \end{equation}%
485: \begin{equation}
486: a_{i}=a_{i0}V^{\frac{1}{3}}\exp{\left[K_{i}\int
487: \frac{dV}{V\sqrt{2\int F\left( V\right)
488: dV+C_{1}}}\right]},i=1,2,3, \label{scale}
489: \end{equation}%
490: \begin{equation}
491: A=\frac{3K^{2}}{2\int F\left( V\right) dV+C_{1}}, \label{A1}
492: \end{equation}%
493: \begin{equation}
494: \sigma ^{2}=\frac{K^{2}}{2V^{2}}, \label{sigma}
495: \end{equation}%
496: \begin{equation}
497: q=2-\frac{3VF\left( V\right) }{2\int F\left( V\right) dV+C_{1}}, \label{q}
498: \end{equation}%
499: where $a_{i0},$ $i=1,2,3$, are arbitrary constant of integration.
500: In order for the general solution of the field equations given by
501: Eqs. (\ref{theta})-(\ref{q}) be defined for all $V\geq 0$, it is
502: necessary to chose the constants $\alpha $ and $B$, describing the
503: thermodynamic properties of the Chaplygin gas and the integration
504: constant $C$ so that the condition $2\int F\left( V\right)
505: dV+C_{1}\geq 0$ holds for all $V\geq 0$. Taking into account the
506: definition of $V$, given by Eq. (\ref{v}), and Eqs. (
507: \ref{scale}), and since the integration constants $K_{i}$,
508: $i=1,2,3$ satisfy the condition $\sum_{i=1}^{3}K_{i}=0$, it
509: follows that the integration constants $a_{i0}$, $i=1,2,3$, have
510: to satisfy the condition $\prod_{i=1}^{3}a_{i0}=1$.
511:
512: By introducing two new variables $\tau $ and $v$ by means of the
513: transformations $\tau =\sqrt{3}k_{4}B^{1/2\left( 1+\alpha \right) }t$ and $%
514: V=V_{0}v$, with $V_{0}=$constant, by normalizing the values of the arbitrary
515: integration constants so that $C/BV_{0}^{(1+\gamma )(1+\alpha )}=1$, $4%
516: \mathcal{U}_{0}V_{0}^{-4/3}/k_{4}^{4}B^{1/(1+\alpha )}\lambda =1$, $%
517: C_{1}/3V_{0}^{2}k_{4}^{2}B^{1/(1+\alpha )}=1$, denoting
518: $B^{1/(1+\alpha )}/\lambda =b$, $\lambda _{0}=2\Lambda
519: /3k_{4}^{2}B^{1/(1+\alpha )}$ and
520: \begin{equation}
521: f(v)=\frac{1}{1+\gamma }+\frac{1}{v^{(1+\gamma )(1+\alpha )}},
522: \end{equation}%
523: it follows that Eq. (\ref{time}) can be written in the form
524: \begin{equation}
525: \tau -\tau _{0}=\int \frac{dv}{\sqrt{\int \left\{ \lambda _{0}v-v\left[
526: \left( \gamma -1\right) f^{\frac{1}{1+\alpha }}-f^{-\frac{\alpha }{1+\alpha }%
527: }\right] -bv\left[ \gamma f^{\frac{2}{1+\alpha }}-f^{\frac{1-\alpha }{%
528: 1+\alpha }}\right] +v^{-\frac{1}{3}}\right\} dv+1}},
529: \end{equation}
530: where $\tau _0=\sqrt{3}k_{4}B^{1/2\left( 1+\alpha \right) }t_0$.
531:
532: With the use of Eqs. (\ref{d}), (\ref{20}) and (\ref{theta}), from Eq. (\ref%
533: {dH}) it follows that the arbitrary integration constants $K_{i}$, $i=1,2,3$
534: and $C_{1}$ must satisfy the consistency condition
535: \begin{equation}
536: K^{2}=\frac{2C_{1}}{3}, \label{K1}
537: \end{equation}
538:
539: Scalar fields are supposed to play a fundamental role in the
540: evolution of the early universe. The Chaplygin gas model can be
541: also described from a field theoretical point of view by
542: introducing a scalar field $\phi $ and a self interacting
543: potential $U(\phi )$, with the Lagrangian \cite{Ka01},
544: \cite{Be02}, \cite{Bi02}, \cite{Ber04}, \cite{De04}
545: \begin{equation}
546: L_{\phi }=\frac{1}{2}\dot{\phi}^{2}-U(\phi ).
547: \end{equation}
548:
549: The energy density and the pressure associated to the scalar field
550: $\phi $ are given by
551: \begin{equation}
552: \rho _{\phi }=\frac{\dot{\phi}^{2}}{2}+U\left( \phi \right) =\rho ,
553: \label{rho}
554: \end{equation}%
555: and
556: \begin{equation}
557: p_{\phi }=\frac{\dot{\phi}^{2}}{2}-U\left( \phi \right) =\gamma \rho -\frac{B%
558: }{\rho ^{\alpha }}, \label{p}
559: \end{equation}%
560: respectively.
561:
562: In view of Eqs.(\ref{rho}), (\ref{p}) and (\ref{d}) we have
563: \begin{equation}
564: \dot{\phi}^{2}=\left( 1+\gamma \right) \left[ \frac{B}{1+\gamma }+\frac{C}{%
565: V^{\left( 1+\gamma \right) \left( 1+\alpha \right) }}\right] ^{\frac{1}{%
566: 1+\alpha }}-B\left[ \frac{B}{1+\gamma }+\frac{C}{V^{\left( 1+\gamma \right)
567: \left( 1+\alpha \right) }}\right] ^{-\frac{\alpha }{1+\alpha }},
568: \label{phi1}
569: \end{equation}
570: and
571: \begin{equation}
572: U\left( \phi \right) =\frac{\left( 1-\gamma \right) }{2}\left[ \frac{B}{%
573: 1+\gamma }+\frac{C}{V^{\left( 1+\gamma \right) \left( 1+\alpha \right) }}%
574: \right] ^{\frac{1}{1+\alpha }}+\frac{B}{2}\left[ \frac{B}{1+\gamma }+\frac{C%
575: }{V^{\left( 1+\gamma \right) \left( 1+\alpha \right) }}\right] ^{-\frac{%
576: \alpha }{1+\alpha }}, \label{U1}
577: \end{equation}
578: respectively.
579:
580: By integrating Eq. (\ref{phi1}), we obtain
581: \begin{equation}
582: \phi -\phi _{0}=\int \sqrt{\frac{\left( 1+\gamma \right) \left[ \frac{B}{%
583: 1+\gamma }+\frac{C}{V^{\left( 1+\gamma \right) \left( 1+\alpha \right) }}%
584: \right] ^{\frac{1}{1+\alpha }}-B\left[ \frac{B}{1+\gamma }+\frac{C}{%
585: V^{\left( 1+\gamma \right) \left( 1+\alpha \right) }}\right] ^{-\frac{\alpha
586: }{1+\alpha }}}{2\int F\left( V\right) dV+C_{1}}}dV, \label{phi2}
587: \end{equation}
588: where $\phi _{0}$ is an arbitrary constant of integration.
589:
590: \section{Discussions and final remarks}
591:
592: In the present paper we have considered Chaplygin gas filled
593: Bianchi type I brane worlds in the framework of the
594: Randall-Sundrum scenario \cite{RS99a}. The Randall-Sundrum
595: mechanism was originally motivated as a possible mechanism for
596: evading Kaluza-Klein compactification by localizing gravity in the
597: presence of an uncompactified extra dimension. In this model, the
598: 5-dimensional bulk space-time is assumed to be vacuum except for
599: the presence of a cosmological constant. Matter fields on the
600: brane are regarded as responsible for the dynamics of the brane.
601: The quadratic terms in the energy-momentum tensor, due to the form
602: of the Gauss-Codazzi equations, may be important in the very early
603: stages of the Universe, leading to major changes in the dynamics
604: of the Universe. The general solution of the gravitational field
605: equations on the brane can be obtained for both discussed brane
606: geometries in an exact parametric form, with the comoving volume
607: element $V$ taken as parameter.
608:
609: By obtaining the general solution of the field equations we have assumed the
610: presence of a non-zero effective cosmological constant $\Lambda $ on the
611: brane. However, the most attractive feature of the Chaplygin gas is that it
612: could explain the main observational properties of the Universe without
613: appealing to an effective cosmological constant. To see if this is indeed
614: the case in the anisotropic brane world models, in the following we will
615: assume that on the brane $\Lambda =0$. This constraint imposes the following
616: relation between the vacuum energies in the bulk and on the brane:
617: \begin{equation}
618: \Lambda _5=-\frac{k_5^2}{6}\lambda ^2
619: \end{equation}
620:
621: Therefore for $\lambda _0=0$ and for a fixed $\gamma $ and $\alpha $, the
622: dynamics of the anisotropic brane Universes is controlled by the parameter $%
623: b=B^{1/(1+\alpha )}/\lambda $, the ratio of the Chaplygin gas equation of
624: state parameter and the vacuum energy on the brane.
625:
626: From the equation of state of the Chaplygin gas with $\gamma =0$
627: it follows that for the critical values $p_{c}$ and $\rho _{c}$ of
628: the pressure and density the parameter $w_{c}=p_{c}/\rho _{c}$ is
629: given by $w_{c}=-B/\rho
630: _{c}^{\alpha +1}$. Evaluating this relation at the present time gives $%
631: B=-w_{c0}\rho _{c0}^{\alpha +1}$. The Chaplygin gas behaves like a
632: cosmological constant for $w_{c0}=-1$, which fixes the constant $B$ as $%
633: B=\rho _{c0}^{\alpha +1}=\left( 3H_{0}^{2}/8\pi G\right) ^{\alpha
634: +1}$, where $H_{0}=3.24\times 10^{-18}h$ s$^{-1}$, $0.5\leq h\leq
635: 1$, is the
636: Hubble constant \cite{PeRa03}, \cite{Pa03}. The definition of the dimensionless time parameter $\tau =%
637: \sqrt{3}k_{4}B^{1/2\left( \alpha +1\right) }t$ then gives $\tau
638: =3H_{0}t$, or $t\approx 10^{17}h^{-1}\times \tau $ s$^{-1}$.
639:
640: Generally, the obtained solution of the gravitational field
641: equations describes an expanding brane Universe. The variation of
642: the expansion scalar $\theta $ as a function of the dimensionless
643: time parameter $\tau $ is represented in Fig. 1.
644:
645: \vspace{0.2in}
646: \begin{figure}[h]
647: \includegraphics{fig1.eps}
648: \caption{Expansion scalar $\theta $ of the Chaplygin gas filled
649: Bianchi type I brane universe as a function of the dimensionless
650: time parameter $\tau $ for $\gamma =1/3$, $\alpha =0.5$ and
651: $b=0.01$ (solid curve), $b=0.02$ (dotted curve), $b=0.03$ (dashed
652: curve) and $b=0.04$ (long dashed curve). We have assumed a
653: vanishing effective cosmological constant on the brane,
654: $\protect\lambda _0=0$. The relation between $\tau $ and the
655: cosmic time $t$ is $t\approx 10^{17}h^{-1}\times \tau $ s$^{-1}$,
656: $0.5\leq h\leq 1$.} \label{FIG1}
657: \end{figure}
658:
659: For a Chaplygin type cosmological fluid confined on the brane, the early
660: cosmological evolution in anisotropic Bianchi type I geometry is
661: fundamentally changed by the inclusion of the terms proportional to the
662: square of the energy density and energy density-pressure products. The time
663: variation of the mean anisotropy parameter of the Bianchi type I space-time
664: is represented, for $\gamma =1/3$, $\alpha =0.5$ and for different values of
665: the parameter $b$, in Fig. 2. At high densities the brane Universe starts
666: its evolution from an isotropic state, with $A(t_0)=0$. The anisotropy
667: increases and reaches a maximum value after a finite time interval $t_{\max}$%
668: , and for $t>t_{\max}$, the mean anisotropy is a monotonically decreasing
669: function, tending to zero in the large time limit. This behavior is in sharp
670: contrast to the usual general relativistic evolution (in this case the
671: quadratic contribution to the energy-momentum tensor vanishes), in which the
672: Universe is born in a state of maximum anisotropy.
673:
674: \vspace{0.2in}
675: \begin{figure}[h]
676: \includegraphics{fig2.eps}
677: \caption{Anisotropy parameter $A$ of the Chaplygin gas filled Bianchi type I
678: brane universe as a function of the dimensionless time parameter $\protect%
679: \tau $ for $\protect\gamma =1/3$, $\protect\alpha =0.5$ and
680: $b=0.01$ (solid curve), $b=0.011$ (dotted curve), $b=0.012$
681: (dashed curve) and $b=0.013$ (long dashed curve). We have assumed
682: a vanishing effective cosmological constant on the brane, $\lambda
683: _0=0$. The relation between $\tau $ and the cosmic time $t$ is
684: $t\approx 10^{17}h^{-1}\times \tau $ s$^{-1}$, $0.5\leq h\leq 1$.}
685: \label{FIG2}
686: \end{figure}
687:
688: The time variation of the shear parameter $\sigma ^2$ is
689: represented, as a function of the dimensionless time $\tau $ and
690: for different values of $b$, in Fig. 3.
691:
692: \vspace{0.2in}
693: \begin{figure}[h]
694: \includegraphics{fig3.eps}
695: \caption{Shear scalar $\sigma ^2$ of the Chaplygin gas filled
696: Bianchi type I brane universe as a function of the dimensionless
697: time parameter $\tau $ for $\gamma =1/3$, $\alpha =0.5$ and
698: $b=0.01$ (solid curve), $b=0.02$ (dotted curve), $b=0.03$ (dashed
699: curve) and $b=0.04$ (long dashed curve). We have assumed a
700: vanishing effective cosmological constant on the brane, $\lambda
701: _0=0$. The relation between $\tau $ and the cosmic time $t$ is
702: $t\approx 10^{17}h^{-1}\times \tau $ s$^{-1}$, $0.5\leq h\leq 1$.}
703: \label{FIG3}
704: \end{figure}
705:
706: The shear is a monotonically decreasing function of the
707: cosmological time, and in the limit of large $t$, $t\rightarrow
708: \infty$, corresponding to the isotropic limit, $\sigma ^2$ tends
709: to zero. In the limit of small times, since $\sigma ^2\propto
710: V^{-2}$, the shear has a singular behavior, tending to infinity,
711: $\lim_{t\rightarrow 0}\sigma ^2\rightarrow \infty$.
712:
713: In the initial stage the evolution of the Chaplygin gas filled
714: Bianchi type I brane universe is non-inflationary, but in the
715: large time limit the brane Universe ends in an accelerating stage.
716: In Fig. 4 we
717: present the dynamics of the deceleration parameter for different values of $%
718: b $ and for $\gamma =1/3$ and $\alpha =0.5$.
719:
720: \vspace{0.2in}
721: \begin{figure}[h]
722: \includegraphics{fig4.eps}
723: \caption{Deceleration parameter $q$ of the Chaplygin gas filled Bianchi type
724: I brane universe as a function of the dimensionless time parameter $\protect%
725: \tau $ for $\gamma =1/3$, $\alpha =0.5$ and $b=0.01$ (solid
726: curve), $b=0.015$ (dotted curve), $b=0.02$ (dashed curve) and
727: $b=0.025$ (long dashed curve). We have assumed a vanishing
728: effective cosmological constant on the brane, $\protect\lambda
729: _0=0$. The relation between $\tau $ and the cosmic time $t$ is
730: $t\approx 10^{17}h^{-1}\times \tau $ s$^{-1}$, $0.5\leq h\leq 1$.}
731: \label{FIG4}
732: \end{figure}
733:
734: The time variation of the scalar field associated with the
735: Chaplygin gas is represented for fixed $\alpha $ and $\gamma $ and
736: different values of the parameter $b$ in Fig. 5. The scalar field
737: is a monotonically decreasing function of time.
738:
739: \vspace{0.2in}
740: \begin{figure}[h]
741: \includegraphics{fig5.eps}
742: \caption{Chaplygin gas associated scalar field $\phi $ evolution
743: on the Bianchi type I brane universe as a function of the
744: dimensionless time parameter $\tau $ for $\protect\gamma =1/3$,
745: $\alpha =0.5$ and $b=0.005$ (solid curve), $b=0.01$ (dotted
746: curve), $b=0.015$ (dashed curve) and $b=0.02$ (long dashed curve).
747: We have assumed a vanishing effective cosmological constant on the
748: brane, $\protect\lambda _0=0$. The relation between $\tau $ and
749: the cosmic time $t$ is $t\approx 10^{17}h^{-1}\times \tau $
750: s$^{-1}$, $0.5\leq h\leq 1$.} \label{FIG5}
751: \end{figure}
752:
753: The dependence of the potential $U(\phi )$ on the scalar field
754: $\phi $ is represented in Fig. 6.
755:
756: \vspace{0.2in}
757: \begin{figure}[h]
758: \includegraphics{fig6.eps}
759: \caption{The potential $U(\protect\phi )$ of the Chaplygin gas associated
760: scalar field as a function of the scalar field $\protect\phi $ for $\protect%
761: \gamma =1/3$, $\protect\alpha =0.5$ and $b=0.005$ (solid curve), $b=0.01$
762: (dotted curve), $b=0.015$ (dashed curve) and $b=0.02$ (long dashed curve).
763: We have assumed a vanishing effective cosmological constant on the brane, $%
764: \protect\lambda _0=0$.} \label{FIG6}
765: \end{figure}
766:
767: In the limit of high densities, the equation of state of the Chaplygin gas
768: reduces to the linear barotropic equation of state of the relativistic
769: matter, $p=\gamma \rho $. In this case the density dependence on the
770: comoving volume is given by $\rho =\rho _{0}/V^{\gamma +1}$, $\rho _{0}=$%
771: constant, and the equation describing the time variation of the comoving
772: volume reduces to
773: \begin{equation}
774: t-t_{0}=\int \frac{dV}{\sqrt{3k_{4}^{2}\rho _{0}V^{1-\gamma }+\frac{%
775: 3k_{4}^{2}}{2\lambda }\rho _{0}^{2}V^{-2\gamma }+\frac{18\mathcal{U}_{0}}{%
776: k_{4}^{2}\lambda }V^{2/3}+C_{1}}}. \label{low}
777: \end{equation}
778:
779: In the limit of very high matter densities, which can be described by the
780: strong equation of state for the hot nucleonic gas, it is assumed that $%
781: p=\rho $. It is believed that matter actually behaves in this
782: manner at densities above about ten times the nuclear density,
783: that is, at densities greater than $10^{17}$ g/cm$^{3}$ and at
784: temperatures $T=\left( \rho c^2
785: /\sigma _{rad} \right) ^{1/4}>10^{13}$ K, where $\sigma _{rad}$ is the radiation constant %
786: \cite{ZN71}. Therefore in this case $\gamma =1$. In the limit of small $V$,
787: the term $V^{-2}$ will dominate in the integral in Eq. (\ref{low}). By
788: maintaining only this term, the integration can be done easily and the time
789: dependence of the relevant geometrical and physical parameters can be
790: obtained as
791: \begin{equation}
792: V=\left( \frac{6k_{4}^{2}\rho _{0}^{2}}{\lambda }\right) ^{1/4}t^{1/2},
793: \end{equation}%
794: \begin{equation}
795: \theta =\frac{1}{2t},
796: \end{equation}
797: \begin{equation}
798: a_{i}=a_{i0}t^{1/6}\exp \left[ 2K_{i}\left( \frac{%
799: 6k_{4}^{2}\rho _{0}^{2}}{\lambda }\right) ^{-1/4}t^{1/2}\right]
800: ,i=1,2,3,
801: \end{equation}
802: \begin{equation}
803: A=\frac{12K^{2}}{\left( \frac{6k_{4}^{2}\rho _{0}^{2}}{\lambda }\right)
804: ^{1/2}}t,
805: \end{equation}%
806: \begin{equation}
807: \sigma ^{2}=\frac{K^{2}}{2\left( \frac{6k_{4}^{2}\rho _{0}^{2}}{\lambda }%
808: \right) ^{1/2}}\frac{1}{t},
809: \end{equation}%
810: \begin{equation}
811: q=5,
812: \end{equation}%
813: where we have assumed the initial conditions $t_{0}=0$ and $V(0)=0$.
814:
815: In the opposite limit of small densities, the equation of state of the
816: Chaplygin gas becomes $p=-B/\rho ^{\alpha }$, corresponding to the limit $%
817: \gamma \rightarrow 0$. In this case the equation describing the time
818: dependence of the comoving volume $V$ is given by
819: \begin{equation}
820: \ddot{V}=\frac{3k_{4}^{2}}{2}V\left\{ \left[ B+\frac{C}{V^{1+\alpha }}\right]
821: ^{\frac{1}{1+\alpha }}+B\left[ B+\frac{C}{V^{1+\alpha }}\right] ^{-\frac{%
822: \alpha }{1+\alpha }}\right\} +\frac{3k_{4}^{2}B}{2\lambda }V\left[ B+\frac{C%
823: }{V^{1+\alpha }}\right] ^{\frac{1-\alpha }{1+\alpha }}+\frac{6\mathcal{U}_{0}%
824: }{k_{4}^{2}\lambda }V^{-\frac{1}{3}}. \label{high}
825: \end{equation}
826:
827: In the limit of large $V$ the condition $B>>C/V^{1+\alpha }$ is
828: always fulfilled, and the general solution of Eq. ( \ref{high})
829: can be expressed as
830: \begin{equation}
831: t-t_{0}=\int \frac{dV}{\sqrt{\Lambda _{c}^{2}V^{2}+\frac{18\mathcal{U}_{0}}{%
832: k_{4}^{2}\lambda }V^{2/3}+C_{1}}}, \label{high1}
833: \end{equation}
834: where we have denoted
835: \begin{equation}
836: \Lambda _{c}=\sqrt{3k_{4}^{2}B^{1/(1+\alpha )}\left( 1+\frac{B^{1/(1+\alpha
837: )}}{2\lambda }\right) }.
838: \end{equation}
839:
840: In the same limit $V\rightarrow \infty $ we also have $\Lambda _{c}V^{2}>>18%
841: \mathcal{U}_{0}V^{2/3}/k_{4}^{2}\lambda +C_{1}$ and therefore Eq. (\ref%
842: {high1}) can be immediately integrated to give
843: \begin{equation}
844: V=V_{1}\exp \left[ \Lambda _{c}\left( t-t_{0}\right) \right] .
845: \end{equation}
846: where $V_{1}$ is an arbitrary constant of integration.
847:
848: The time evolution of the physical and geometrical quantities in
849: the limit of the large comoving volume is given by
850: \begin{equation}
851: \theta =\Lambda _{c},
852: \end{equation}%
853: \begin{equation}
854: a_{i}=a_{i0}\exp \left[
855: \frac{\Lambda _{c}}{3}\left( t-t_{0}\right) \right] \exp \left\{ -\frac{K_{i}%
856: }{\Lambda _{c}V_{1}}\exp \left[ -\Lambda _{c}\left( t-t_{0}\right)
857: \right] \right\} ,i=1,2,3,
858: \end{equation}
859: \begin{equation}
860: A=\frac{3K^{2}}{%
861: \Lambda _{c}^{2}V_{1}^{2}}\exp \left[ -2\Lambda _{c}\left(
862: t-t_{0}\right)\right]
863: \end{equation}
864: \begin{equation}
865: \sigma ^{2}=\frac{K^{2}}{2V_{1}^{2}}\exp \left[ -2\Lambda
866: _{c}\left( t-t_{0}\right) \right],
867: \end{equation}
868: \begin{equation}
869: q=-1.
870: \end{equation}
871:
872: In the limit of large times the mean anisotropy parameter tends to zero, $%
873: A\rightarrow 0$, and the Chaplygin gas filled Bianchi type I
874: Universe ends in an isotropic state, corresponding to a de Sitter
875: type Universe. This shows that the Chaplygin gas model offers a
876: real possibility for replacing the effective cosmological constant
877: on the brane.
878:
879: \begin{references}
880:
881: \bibitem{Pe99} S. Perlmutter et al., Astrophys. J. {\bf 517}, 565
882: (1998); A. G. Riess et al., Astron. J. {\bf 116}, 109 (1998).
883:
884: \bibitem{Ber00} P. de Bernardis et al., Nature {\bf 404}, 995
885: (2000); S. Hanany et al., Astrophys. J. {\bf 545}, L5 (2000).
886:
887: \bibitem{PeRa03} P. J. E. Peebles and B. Ratra, Rev. Mod. Phys.
888: {\bf 75}, 559 (2003).
889:
890: \bibitem{Pa03} T. Padmanabhan, Phys. Repts. {\bf 380}, 235 (2003).
891:
892: \bibitem{Paetal} T. Matos and A. Urena-Lopez, Class. Quantum Grav.
893: {\bf 17}, L75 (2000); C. Wetterich, Phys. Rev. D. {\bf 65},
894: 123512; T. Padmanabhan and T. R. Choudhury, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 66},
895: 081301 (2002).
896:
897: \bibitem{Ka01} A. Kamenshchik, U. Moschella and V. Pasquier, Phys.
898: Lett. B {\bf 511}, 265 (2001).
899:
900: \bibitem{Be02}M. C. Bento, O. Bertolami and A. Sen, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 66},
901: 043507 (2002).
902:
903: \bibitem{Ka00}A. Kamenshchik, U. Moschella and V. Pasquier, Phys.
904: Lett. B {\bf 487}, 7 (2000).
905:
906: \bibitem{Ka98} S. K. Kama, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 424}, 39 (1998).
907:
908: \bibitem{Bi02} N. Bilic, G. B. Tupper and R. D. Viollier, Phys.
909: Lett. B {\bf 535}, 17 (2002).
910:
911: \bibitem{No05} M. Novello, M. Makler, L. S. Werneck and C. A.
912: Romero, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 71}, 043515 (2005).
913:
914: \bibitem{Chco} D. Carturan and F. Finelli, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 68}, 103501 (2003);
915: R. Bean and O. Dore, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 68}, 023515 (2003); L. M.
916: G. Beca, P. P. Avelino, J. P. M. de Carvalho and C. J. A. P.
917: Martins, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 67}, 101301 (2003); M. C. Bento, O.
918: Bertolami and A. A. Sen, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 70} 083519, (2004); R.
919: R. R. Reis, I. Waga, M. O. Calvao and S. E.
920: Joras, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 68} 061302 (2003); P. P. Avelino, L. M. G. Beca, J. P. M. de Carvalho and C. J. A. P.
921: Martins, JCAP {\bf 0309} 002 (2003);
922: G. M. Kremer, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 68} 123507 (2003); T. Multamaki,
923: M. Manera and E. Gaztanaga, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 69}, 023004 (2004);
924: M. Szydlowski and W. Czaja, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 69}
925: 023506 (2004); P. P. Avelino, L. M. G. Beca, J. P. M. de Carvalho, C. J. A. P. Martins and E.J.
926: Copeland, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 69} 041301 (2004).
927:
928: \bibitem{Ber04} O. Bertolami, A. A. Sen, S. Sen and P. T. Silva, Mon. Not. Roy.
929: Astron. Soc. {\bf 353}, 329 (2004)
930:
931: \bibitem{Fa02} M. Makler, S. Quinet de Oliveira and I. Waga, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 555},
932: 1 (2003); J. V. Cunha, J. S. Alcaniz, J. A. S. Lima, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 69},
933: 083501 (2004); M. C. Bento, O. Bertolami, N. M. C. Santos and A. A. Sen, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 71}, 063501 (2005).
934:
935: \bibitem{Be03} M. C. Bento, O. Bertolami and A. A. Sen, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 575},
936: 172 (2003); M. C. Bento, O. Bertolami and A. A. Sen, Phys. Rev. D
937: {\bf 67}, 063003 (2003); L. Amendola, F. Finelli, C. Burigana, D.
938: Carturan, JCAP {\bf 0307}, 005 (2003).
939:
940: \bibitem{De03} A. Dev, D. Jain and J. S. Alcaniz, Phys. Rev. D
941: {\bf 67}, 023515 (2003); A. Dev, D. Jain and J. S. Alcaniz,
942: Astron. Astrophys. {\bf 417}, 847 (2004); P. T. Silva and O.
943: Bertolami, Astrophys. J. {\bf 599}, 829 (2003).
944:
945: \bibitem{Al03} J. S. Alcaniz, D. Jain and A. Dev, Phys. Rev. D
946: {\bf 67}, 043514 (2003).
947:
948: \bibitem{Cu04} J. V. Cunha, J. A. S. Lima and J. S. Alcaniz, Phys.
949: Rev. D {\bf 69}, 083501 (2004); Z.-H. Zhu, Astron. Astrophys. {\bf
950: 423}, 421 (2004).
951:
952: \bibitem{Ei} L. P. Eisenhart, Riemannian geometry, Princeton,
953: Princeton University Press (1949).
954:
955: \bibitem{Ak83} K. Akama, Pregeometry, in Lect. Notes Phys. {\bf
956: 176}, 267 (1983).
957:
958: \bibitem{RuSh83} V. A. Rubakov and M. E. Shaposhnikov, Phys. Lett.
959: B{\bf 125}, 136 (1983).
960:
961: \bibitem{BaKu99} I. Bandos and W. Kummer, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A {\bf
962: 14}, 4881 (1999).
963:
964: \bibitem{PaTa00} M. Pavsic and V. Tapia, gr-qc/0010045 (2000).
965:
966: \bibitem{RS99a} L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 83},
967: 3370 (1999); L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett {\bf 83},
968: 4690 (1999).
969:
970: \bibitem{Ma01} R. Maartens, Living Rev. Rel. {\bf 7}, 7 (2004).
971:
972: \bibitem{SMS00} T. Shiromizu, K. Maeda and M. Sasaki, {\it Phys. Rev. {\bf %
973: D62}}, 024012 (2000); M. Sasaki, T. Shiromizu and K. Maeda, {\it Phys. Rev. {\bf %
974: D62}}, 024008 (2000).
975:
976: \bibitem{all} K. Maeda and D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 62}, 124009
977: (2000); R. Maartens, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 62}, 084023 (2000); A.
978: Campos and C. F. Sopuerta, Phys. Rev. D{\bf 64}, 104011 (2001);
979: D. Langlois, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 86}, 2212 (2001); C.-M.
980: Chen, T. Harko and M. K. Mak, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 64}, 124017
981: (2001); L. Anchordoqui, J. Edelstein, C. Nunez, S. P. Bergliaffa,
982: M. Schvellinger, M. Trobo and F. Zyserman, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 64},
983: 084027 (2001); J. D. Barrow and R. Maartens, Phys. Lett. B {\bf
984: 532}, 153 (2002); H. Kudoh and T. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 65},
985: 104034 (2002); H. A. Bridgman, K. A. Malik and D. Wands, Phys.
986: Rev. D {\bf 65},
987: 043502 (2002); C.-M. Chen, T. Harko, W. F. Kao and M. K. Mak, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf %
988: 636}, 159 (2002); M. Szydlowski, M. P. Dabrowski and A. Krawiec,
989: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 66}, 064003 (2002); T. Harko and M. K. Mak ,
990: Class. Quantum Grav. {\bf 20}, 407 (2003), C.-M. Chen, T. Harko,
991: W. F. Kao and M. K. Mak, JCAP {\bf 0311}, 005 (2003); Iver
992: Brevik, Kazuo Ghoroku, Masanobu Yahiro, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 70}
993: 064012, (2004).
994:
995: \bibitem{all1} N. Dadhich and S. G. Ghosh, Phys. Lett. {\bf B518}, 1
996: (2001); M. G. Santos, F. Vernizzi and P. G. Ferreira, Phys. Rev. D {\bf %
997: 64}, 063506 (2001); M. Bruni, C. Germani and R. Maartens, Phys.
998: Rev. Lett. {\bf 87}, 231302 (2001); H.-C. Kim, S.-H. Moon and J.
999: H. Yee, JHEP {\bf 0202}, 046 (2002); M Govender and N. Dadhich,
1000: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 538}, 233 (2002); T. Wiseman, Class.
1001: Quant. Grav. {\bf 19}, 3083 (2002); R. Neves and C. Vaz, Phys.
1002: Rev. D {\bf 66}, 124002 (2002); L. A. Anchordoqui, H. Goldberg and
1003: A. D. Shapere, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 66}, 024033 (2002); H. Kudoh, T.
1004: Tanaka and T. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 68}, 024035 (2003); T.
1005: Harko and M. K. Mak, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 69}, 064020 (2004).
1006:
1007: \bibitem{MaHa04} M. K. Mak and T. Harko, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 70},
1008: 024010 (2004).
1009:
1010: \bibitem{MSS00}R. Maartens, V. Sahni and T. D. Saini,Phys. Rev. D {\bf 63},
1011: 063509 (2001); A. V. Toporensky, Class. Quant. Grav. {\bf 18},
1012: 2311 (2001); A. V. Frolov, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 514}, 213 (2001);
1013: M. G. Santos, F. Vernizzi and P. G. Ferreira, Phys. Rev. D {\bf
1014: 64}, 063506 (2001); T. Harko and M. K. Mak, Class. Quant. Grav.
1015: {\bf 20}, 407 (2003).
1016:
1017: \bibitem{ChHaMa01a}C.-M. Chen, T. Harko and M. K. Mak, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 64}, 044013
1018: (2001).
1019:
1020: \bibitem{CS201} A. Campos and C. F. Sopuerta, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 63},
1021: 104012.
1022:
1023: \bibitem{Co01a} A. Coley, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 66} 023512 (2002).
1024:
1025: \bibitem{Co01b} A. Coley, Class. Quantum Grav. {\bf 19},
1026: L45 (2002).
1027:
1028: \bibitem{HaMa04a}T. Harko and M. K. Mak, Class. Quantum. Grav. {\bf
1029: 21}, 1489 (2004).
1030:
1031: \bibitem{MW00} K. Maeda and D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 62}, 124009
1032: (2000).
1033:
1034: \bibitem{De04} U. Debnath, A. Banerjee and S. Chakraborty, Class.
1035: Quant. Grav. {\bf 21}, 5609 (2004).
1036:
1037: \bibitem{ZN71} Ya. B. Zeldovich and I. D. Novikov,
1038: Relativistic Astrophysics, Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago,
1039: Ill (1971).
1040:
1041: \end{references}
1042:
1043: \end{document}
1044: