1: \documentclass{article}
2: \usepackage{bris}
3: \usepackage{cite}
4: \usepackage{epsfig}
5:
6: \parskip 2mm plus 2mm minus 1mm % Add space between paragraphs
7: \renewcommand{\topfraction}{1.0} % These three commands assure that floats
8: \renewcommand{\bottomfraction}{1.0} % (figures, tables) can cover a whole page
9: \renewcommand{\textfraction}{0.0} % and no text is required
10:
11: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
12: %%BEGINNING OF TEXT
13: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
14:
15: \begin{document}
16: \begin{titlepage}{BRIS/HEP/2000--02}{July 2000}
17: \title{The Measurement of Azimuthal Asymmetries In Deep Inelastic
18: Scattering}
19:
20: \author{N. H. Brook\\
21: (on behalf of the ZEUS Collaboration)}
22:
23: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
24: % You may repeat \author \address as often as necessary %
25: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
26:
27: \begin{abstract}
28: The distribution of the azimuthal angle for the charged hadrons has been
29: studied in the hadronic centre-of-mass system for neutral current
30: deep inelastic positron-proton scattering at HERA.
31: Measurements of the dependence of the moments of this
32: distribution on the transverse momenta of the charged
33: hadrons are presented.
34: Asymmetries that can be unambiguously attributed to perturbative
35: QCD processes have been observed for the first time.
36: \end{abstract}
37: \end{titlepage}
38:
39: \section{Introduction}
40: Semi-inclusive processes in deep inelastic scattering (DIS) are
41: of importance because they can be used to test the
42: perturbative Quantum Chromodynamic (QCD) description of hadron production
43: via parton fragmentation.
44: An observable of particular interest is the distribution
45: of the azimuthal angle, $\phi,$ (measured in the hadronic centre-of-mass
46: frame, HCM) between the lepton scattering
47: plane, defined by the incoming and outgoing lepton momenta,
48: and the hadron production plane, defined by the exchanged
49: virtual boson and an outgoing hadron .
50:
51: Asymmetries in the $\phi$ distribution, i.e. terms proportional to
52: $\cos \phi$ and $\cos 2\phi$
53: arise whenever a non-zero transverse momentum, in the HCM frame,
54: is present in the
55: scattering process.
56: Consequently both non-perturbative and perturbative QCD
57: effects~\cite{allazi,cahn,chay,gehrmann} give rise to these
58: asymmetries.
59: The azimuthal dependence of parton production has the
60: form
61:
62: \begin{equation}
63: d\sigma/d\phi = A + B \cos\phi + C \cos 2\phi .
64: \label{eq:azi}
65: \end{equation}
66:
67: \noindent This form results from the polarisation of the exchanged
68: virtual boson.
69: The coefficients $B$ and $C$ depend on the helicities
70: of the final-state parton(s), partonic transverse momenta
71: and on colour coherence~\cite{chay}.
72: The
73: $\cos 2\phi$ term is expected from interference of amplitudes arising
74: from the $+1$ and $-1$
75: helicity components of the transversely-polarised part of the exchanged
76: boson,
77: whereas transverse/longitudinal interference gives rise to the
78: $\cos\phi$ term.
79: Terms in $\sin\phi$ and $\sin
80: 2\phi$ are not expected for neutral current reactions.
81:
82: The asymmetry that results from the intrinsic momentum of a quark in the proton
83: is referred to as the non-perturbative asymmetry.
84: Since the intrinsic momentum is small, this asymmetry should
85: fall rapidly with increasing transverse momentum of
86: the measured hadron and with
87: increasing $Q^2$~\cite{cahn},
88: where
89: $Q^2\equiv -q^2$
90: is the negative square of the four-momentum of the virtual exchanged boson.
91: In particular, the term $C$ is small at high $Q^2.$
92: % for the non-perturbative effect.
93: The transverse momenta arising from the fragmentation itself does not contribute
94: to the asymmetry but only smears the observed distribution~\cite{chay}.
95:
96: In contrast, the asymmetry associated with leading-order terms in perturbative
97: QCD calculations, the perturbative asymmetry, is weakly dependent on $Q^2$ and
98: persists at high transverse momenta.
99: The perturbative QCD contribution to
100: terms $B$ and $C$ is large
101: at leading order (LO) in $\alpha_s.$
102: The $\cos 2\phi $ term can be unambiguously
103: attributed to perturbative QCD processes in the high $Q^2$ region under
104: investigation.
105:
106: The event kinematics of DIS are determined by
107: $Q^2$, and one of the two
108: Bjorken scaling variables $x=Q^2/2P\!\cdot\!q$
109: or $y = Q^2/xs,$
110: where $P$ is the four-momentum of the incoming proton
111: and $\sqrt s$ is the positron-proton centre-of-mass energy.
112: The kinematic region studied is $0.2 < y < 0.8$ and $ 0.01 < x < 0.1,$
113: corresponding to a $Q^2$ range $180 < Q^2 < 7220 {\rm\ GeV^2}.$
114:
115: The form of Eq.~\ref{eq:azi} is expected to be maintained for single
116: particle production~\cite{chay,gehrmann}, since high-momentum hadrons are
117: produced close to the direction of the parton.
118: Note that in order to observe the $\cos \phi$ asymmetry, a selection
119: procedure is required which consistently associates leading
120: hadrons produced from
121: {\rm either} quarks {\rm or} gluons~\cite{chay,gehrmann}.
122: Since the gluon fragmentation function is `softer'
123: than that of the quarks, the hadron-quark correlation can be enhanced by
124: selecting `leading' charged particles. This was accomplished
125: by cutting on the Lorentz-invariant variable
126: $z_h(=P\cdot p_h/P\cdot q)>0.2$, where
127: $p_h$ is the track or particle four-vector.
128:
129:
130:
131: \section{Results}
132: Figure~\ref{fig:phidist} shows the
133: differential $\phi$ distributions
134: of charged hadrons
135: for four values of their minimum transverse momentum, $p_c,$ in the HCM.
136: The results obtained from the main analysis method~\cite{azipaper}
137: (full line) and a bin-by-bin
138: correction method (points) are seen to agree.
139: At low $p_c,$ a clear $\cos \phi $ term is observed. As the value of
140: $p_c$ is increased a $\cos 2\phi $ term becomes evident.
141:
142: \begin{figure}[ht]
143: \centering
144: \begin{center}
145: \mbox{\epsfig{file=DESY-00-040_2.eps,height=10.0cm}}
146: \end{center}
147: \caption{
148: The
149: differential $\phi$ distributions obtained
150: for four values of the transverse momentum
151: cut, $p_c,$ in the hadronic centre-of-mass frame
152: in the kinematic region $ 0.01 < x < 0.1$ and $ 0.2 < y < 0.8$
153: for charged hadrons with $0.2 < z_h < 1.0.$
154: The full line
155: (with accompanying statistical error band) is the
156: result obtained from the main analysis.
157: The data points were corrected using a bin-by-bin procedure (only
158: statistical errors are shown).
159: }
160: \label{fig:phidist}
161: \end{figure}
162:
163: \begin{figure}[ht]
164: \centering
165: \begin{center}
166: \mbox{\epsfig{file=DESY-00-040_4.eps,height=9.0cm}}
167: \end{center}
168: \caption{ The values of $\langle \cos \phi \rangle$
169: and $\langle \cos 2\phi \rangle$ are shown as a function of $p_c$
170: in the kinematic region $ 0.01 < x < 0.1$ and $ 0.2 < y < 0.8$
171: for charged hadrons with $0.2 < z_h < 1.0.$
172: The inner error bars represent the
173: statistical errors, the outer are statistical
174: and systematic errors added in quadrature.
175: The lines are the LO predictions from
176: ZEUS with perturbative and non-perturbative
177: contributions (full line),
178: ZEUS with the perturbative contribution only (dashed line)
179: and Ahmed \& Gehrmann (dotted line -- see
180: text for discussion). For
181: the case of $\langle \cos 2\phi \rangle,$ the ZEUS total and
182: perturbative predictions are almost identical.}
183: \label{fig:mc_lo}
184: \end{figure}
185:
186: Figure~\ref{fig:mc_lo} shows the moments
187: $\langle \cos \phi \rangle$ and $\langle \cos 2\phi \rangle$
188: as a function of
189: $p_c.$
190: The $\sin\phi$ term
191: is consistent with zero independent of the value chosen for $p_c,$
192: in agreement with expectation.
193: The value
194: of $\langle \cos \phi \rangle$ is negative and decreases in magnitude
195: as $p_c$ is increased.
196: In contrast,
197: the value of $\langle \cos 2\phi \rangle$ is
198: positive and rises as $p_c$ is increased.
199: Figure~\ref{fig:mc_lo} also compares the data with two LO QCD calculations.
200: Both calculations were made with $Q$ as the
201: appropriate scale, with the Binnewies et al. LO fragmentation
202: function~\cite{binnewies} and with the CTEQ4
203: LO proton parton densities~\cite{CTEQ}.
204:
205: The calculation from ZEUS (based
206: on the calculation of Chay et al.~\cite{chay})
207: includes an estimation of the non-perturbative
208: contribution, from intrinsic $k_T$ and hadronisation $p_T,$
209: and integrates over the whole kinematic range.
210: The results of Ahmed~\& Gehrmann are purely at
211: leading order in $\alpha_s$ and are evaluated
212: at the mean values $\langle x \rangle=0.022$ and $\langle Q^2 \rangle=750\
213: {\rm GeV^2}$ of the data.
214: The different implementations
215: account for the observed difference in the two predictions;
216: using $\langle x \rangle$ and $\langle Q^2 \rangle$ in the ZEUS
217: perturbative calculation leads to agreement with the
218: Ahmed~\& Gehrmann calculation.
219:
220:
221:
222: \section{Conclusions}
223: The azimuthal asymmetries in the deep inelastic electroproduction of single
224: particles have been measured at HERA
225: %in the hadronic
226: %centre-of-mass frame in the kinematic region, $\langle x \rangle
227: %= 0.022$ and $\langle Q^2 \rangle =750\ {\rm GeV^2}.$
228: in the HCM.
229: For hadrons produced at large
230: transverse momenta, the measured value for $\langle \cos\phi \rangle$
231: is negative and is in agreement with QCD
232: predictions.
233: The moment $\langle \cos 2\phi \rangle$
234: has been measured here for the first time and is
235: non-zero and positive. It increases as a function of the minimum
236: particle transverse momentum, as expected from QCD.
237: Since the non-perturbative contribution to
238: $\langle \cos 2\phi\rangle $ is predicted to be
239: negligible,
240: this measurement provides clear
241: evidence for a perturbative QCD contribution to the azimuthal asymmetry.
242:
243: \newpage
244: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
245: \bibitem{allazi} H.~Georgi and H.~D.~Politzer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40
246: (1978) 3;
247: G.~K\"opp, R.~Maciejko and P.~M.~Zerwas, Nucl. Phys. B144 (1978) 123;
248: A.~Mendez, Nucl. Phys. B145 (1978) 199.
249:
250: \bibitem{cahn} R.~N.~Cahn, Phys. Lett. B78 (1978) 269.
251:
252: \bibitem{chay} J.~Chay et al., Phys. Rev. D45 (1992) 46; J.~Chay et al.,
253: Phys. Lett. B269 (1991) 175.
254:
255: \bibitem{gehrmann} M.~Ahmed and T.~Gehrmann, Phys. Lett. B465 (1999)
256: 297.
257:
258: \bibitem{azipaper} ZEUS Collab., J.~Breitweg et al., DESY 00-040.
259: % to appear in Phys. Lett. B
260:
261: \bibitem{binnewies} J.~Binnewies, B.A.~Kniehl and G.~Kramer,
262: Phys.\ Rev.\ D52 (1995) 4947.
263:
264: \bibitem{CTEQ} H.~L.~Lai et al., Phys.\ Rev.\ D55 (1997) 1280.
265:
266: \end{thebibliography}
267:
268: \end{document}
269:
270: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
271: %% End of sprocl.tex
272: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
273:
274:
275:
276:
277: