1: \documentstyle[fleqn,espcrc2,epsfig]{article}
2:
3: \title{Latest Results on Weak Semi-Leptonic Hyperon Decays in KTeV}
4: \author {Nickolas Solomey \address {Enrico
5: Fermi Institute, The University of Chicago,
6: Chicago, IL 60637, USA}}
7:
8: \begin{document}
9:
10: \begin{abstract}
11: The KTeV experiment at Fermilab has finished its $\Xi^0$ semi-leptonic
12: decay analysis from the 1997 run and presented here are the final
13: numbers for the branching ratio and form factors. A new run with
14: three times the statistics was taken in 1999 and a first look at the
15: data shows the quality and consistency of the results, predicting
16: a similar improvement in these measurements.
17: \end{abstract}
18:
19: \maketitle
20:
21: \section{Semi-Leptonic $\Xi^0$ Decays}
22: Semi-leptonic hyperon decays are important as
23: tests for new physics by measuring their form factors and branching
24: ratios \cite{theory1}. This work started experimentally with
25: $\Lambda$ beta decay \cite{Jenson,Earl}:
26: \begin{equation}
27: \Lambda \rightarrow p e^- \bar\nu.
28: \end{equation}
29: It was followed by a high statistics sample of $\Sigma^-$ beta
30: decays \cite{E715}:
31: \begin{equation}
32: \Sigma^- \rightarrow n e^- \bar\nu,
33: \end{equation}
34: and $\Xi^-$ beta decays \cite{WA2}:
35: \begin{equation}
36: \Xi^- \rightarrow \Lambda e^- \bar\nu \:\:\:\:\: and \:\:\:\:\:
37: \Xi^- \rightarrow \Sigma^0 e^- \bar\nu.
38: \end{equation}
39:
40: It was proposed in 1993 to extend the KTeV program \cite{ktev} to include a
41: search for the unseen $\Xi^0$ beta decays \cite{Solomey}:
42: \begin{equation}
43: \Xi^0 \rightarrow \Sigma^+ e^- \bar\nu.
44: \end{equation}
45: This suggestion of the author was shown to be accessible in KTeV because
46: even though there was no charged particle vertex, the $\pi^0$ decay into
47: two gammas and the high precision electronmagnetic calorimeter
48: permits the vertex to be precisely measured by constraining to
49: the $\pi^0$ mass \cite{Tony}. This along with the high flux of
50: $\Xi^0$ hyperons in the experiment permitted these analysis.
51:
52: Hyperon semi-leptonic decays with a muon replacing the electron are
53: only energetically permitted for a few decay modes.
54: In all there were only three types of such decays ever
55: observed and all of these with a very small number
56: of events. It was the author who introduced
57: and performed the analysis in KTeV of the $\Xi^0$ muonic decay \cite{Solomey2}.
58: These are important because they can be a first glimpse at the g$_3$
59: form factor which is multiplied by (M$_{lepton}$/M$_{hyperon}$);
60: in beta decays this ratio squelches any effect of the g$_3$ form factor, but
61: in muonic decays this term, although small, is no longer negligible
62: \cite{linke}.
63:
64: \section{Final Results from KTeV-97}
65: Many summary talks of the KTeV hyperon data and analysis techniques
66: are available elsewhere \cite{nick}. The goal of this section is
67: to summarize in one place the final numbers available at this time.
68: A Physical Review Letter was put out with a fraction of
69: the KTeV 1997 data called the winter run, yielding a branching ratio
70: based on 176 events of
71: 2.71~($\pm$0.22~$\pm$0.31)~$\times$~10$^{-4}$ \cite{cbet},
72: where the first error is statistical and the second systematic.
73: Since then the remaining 1997 data sample has been analyzed
74: \cite{wisc} and
75: the branching ratio for the $\Xi^0$ beta decay from this separate sample is
76: 2.60~($\pm$0.11~$\pm$0.16)~$\times$~10$^{-4}$,
77: based on 626 events. The theoretical expected is 2.6~$\times$~10$^{-4}$.
78: The $\Xi^0$ muonic decay has a preliminary branching ratio of
79: 3.5~($^{+2.0}_{-1.0}$~$^{+0.5}_{-1.0}$)~$\times$~10$^{-6}$ based on 5 events,
80: again the first error is statistical and the second systematic the
81: asymmetric errors are due to the small sample of events; the
82: theoretical expected is 2.6~$\times$~10$^{-6}$.
83:
84: The final four form factors obtained in our analysis \cite{bright} using a
85: ultra clean sample of $\Xi^0$ beta decays by using the added power
86: of the TRD particle identification \cite{trd} are:
87: $f_1 = 0.99 \pm 0.14$, $\frac{g_1}{f_1}=1.12 \pm 0.27$,
88: $\frac{f_2}{f_1}=2.3 \pm 1.3$, and $\frac{g_2}{f_1}= -1.4 \pm 2.1$
89: (the errors are combined statistical and systematic for brevity);
90: here this analysis used the previously quoted branching ratio, and permitted
91: the $g_2$ form factor to float. The $g_2$ form factor is consistent with
92: zero, see figure \ref{g2},
93: and in another analysis it was constrained to be zero and the remaining three
94: form factors reanalyzed and they essentially remained unchanged.
95: \begin{figure}
96: \begin{center}
97: \mbox{
98: \epsfig{file=g1g2.eps,%
99: height=0.99\linewidth}
100: }
101: \end{center}
102: \caption{Maximum likelihood fit of the form factors g$_1$ and g$_2$,
103: the later is consistent with zero.}
104: \label{g2}
105: \end{figure}
106:
107: \section{Improved Form Factors}
108: The form factors reported in the previous section are also dependent upon
109: the mass of the $\Xi^0$ particle and its life time. If either of these
110: numbers are off then this can have an effect upon the form factor
111: results. The values used were those from the 1998 PDG \cite{pdg}.
112: The KTeV experiment has tried improving both of these values: a first
113: attempt at improving the mass was made \cite{Marlon}, but another
114: experiment \cite{NA48} has released an improved value before our
115: measurement was finished and they have an error that is better than
116: what we would have achieved so this analysis was not pursued;
117: however, we have made a factor of three
118: improvement in the life time of the $\Xi^0$ \cite{Pietryko}, see
119: figure \ref{lifetime}. Reevaluation of the form factors with these
120: two improved values will lead to slightly different values,
121: but consistent with the error bars.
122: \begin{figure}
123: \begin{center}
124: \mbox{
125: \epsfig{file=lifetime_ratio.eps,%
126: height=0.99\linewidth}
127: }
128: \end{center}
129: \caption{Ratio of data and normalized Monte-Carlo of the proper time (in
130: seconds) of the decay $\Xi^0 \rightarrow \Lambda^0 \pi^0$. Our
131: preliminary lifetime measurement is 2.79($\pm$0.01 $\pm$0.05)$\times$10$^{-10}$
132: seconds, the first error is statistical based on a fit to 94839 events, the
133: second is the systematic error from z and p$_{\Xi^0}$ dependency.}
134: \label{lifetime}
135: \end{figure}
136:
137: An accurate determination of the $\Xi^0$ mass is also important as a test of
138: SU(3) symmetry in the Coleman-Glashow mass relationship between the hyperons:
139: \begin{equation}
140: M_{\Xi^-} - M_{\Xi^0} = (M_p - M_n) + (M_{\Sigma^-} - M_{\Sigma^+})
141: \end{equation}
142: Using the new mass value, yet to be incorporated in the PDG, 1314.82$\pm$0.06,
143: this equates to 6.49$\pm$0.14~=~6.73$\pm$0.08, a
144: small SU(3) symmetry breaking less than 3.6\%. However, there is a
145: hyperon beta decay that is yet unseen that is an even better test:
146: \begin{equation}
147: \Xi^- \rightarrow \Xi^0 e^- \bar\nu.
148: \end{equation}
149: This is such a powerful test of SU(3) symmetry breaking because there is
150: only $\sim$6.49 MeV of energy being released in this beta decay, so by measuring
151: the branching ratio this is the most accurate way to measure the mass
152: difference between the charged and neutral $\Xi$ particles.
153: \begin{figure}[h]
154: \begin{center}
155: \mbox{
156: \epsfig{file=casbet_ktev99.eps,%
157: height=0.99\linewidth}
158: }
159: \end{center}
160: \caption{Preliminary results from the data obtained in
161: the KTeV run of 1999 using the analysis techniques developed for
162: the KTeV 1997 data sample \protect\cite{nick,wisc,bright}
163: yields more than 2100 $\Xi^0$ beta decays
164: (small peak centered on zero), here
165: the horizontal axis is the mass of the reconstructed $\Sigma^+$
166: (i.e. p$\pi^0$ mass) subtracting its known value 1.189 GeV/c$^2$.
167: The peak on the left has been identified as several different
168: background \protect\cite{bright}.}
169: \label{casbeta}
170: \end{figure}
171:
172: \section{First results from KTeV-99}
173: Data from a new run of KTeV in 1999 with improved triggers,
174: data acquisition and beam intensity is available for analysis. The
175: new run is expected to yield a three fold increase in $\Xi^0$ beta
176: decays, see figure \ref{casbeta}, and a two
177: fold increase in $\Xi^0$ muonic decays, see figure
178: \ref{muonic}.
179: \begin{figure}[h]
180: \begin{center}
181: \mbox{
182: \epsfig{file=kalman.eps,%
183: height=0.99\linewidth}
184: }
185: \end{center}
186: \caption{Preliminary results from the
187: KTeV run in 1999 yields more $\Xi^0$ muonic decays. Here
188: both axis are in units of GeV/c$^2$,
189: on the horizontal is plotted the invariant mass of the
190: p$\pi^0$, and the vertical the mass ($\pi^+ \mu^- \pi^0$),
191: from the dominant Kaon backgrounds:
192: either K$^0\rightarrow \pi^+ \pi^0 \pi^-$ where $\pi^- \rightarrow
193: \mu^- \bar\nu$ or K$\mu$4.}
194: \label{muonic}
195: \end{figure}
196: The circle points are those events that satisfy the selection cuts
197: except for the mass analysis of the two axis and p$_t^2$ of the reconstructed
198: $\Xi^0$, and the triangle points are the opposite
199: charge sign analysis. There are far less anti $\Xi^0$ muonic decays
200: expected in this wrong charge
201: sign analysis, due to a 10x suppression of anti $\Xi^0$ at production.
202: The horizontal
203: band at the bottom are identifiable as the mentioned Kaon background decays,
204: and the vertical band centered
205: on 1.189 GeV/c$^2$ are the $\Xi^0$ muonic decay events,
206: the filled in data points are
207: those that satisfy the kinematic cuts from the 1997 blind analysis
208: [p$_{t}^{2}<$0.0008~(GeV/c)$^2$ and various mass cuts].
209: The small dots are the signal Monte-Carlo for the final
210: event selection method. It
211: was decided that our blind analysis from the 1997 data was sufficiently
212: strong and straight forward enough that we did not need to make the 1999
213: analysis blind, but it could be applied directly to the new data set.
214: This new KTeV data set should be calibrated by the end of
215: 2000 and improved branching ratio, form factors, lifetime and
216: possibly mass measurement within a year afterwards, depending
217: on manpower and computer resources.
218:
219: \section{Conclusion}
220: The hyperon program in KTeV has
221: observed both semi-leptonic decays of the $\Xi^{0}$. A high statistics
222: sample of the beta decay was used for
223: measuring its branching ratio and form factors.
224: Furthermore, the observation of the muonic decay of the
225: neutral Cascade was observed with enough data
226: to measure its branching ratio, but more data from the 1999 run is
227: now available to improve this measurement. Furthermore, the $\Xi^0$
228: normal mode decay was also available to improve the mass and life-time
229: values for this particle, important for SU(3) symmetry tests
230: as well as improving the form factor measurements.
231:
232: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
233: \bibitem{theory1} A. Garcia and P. Kielanowski, {\em The Beta Decay of
234: Hyperons}, Lecture Notes in Physics, {\bf 222}, Springer-Verlag,
235: Berlin, 1985.
236: \bibitem{Jenson}M. Aguilar-Benitez et al., Phys. Lett. B {\bf239} (1990) 1.
237: \bibitem{Earl}J. Lindquist {\em et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf27}
238: (1971) 612, and Phys. Rev. D {\bf16} (1977) 2104.
239: \bibitem{E715}S. Y. Hsueh {\em et al.}, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 38} (1988) 2056.
240: \bibitem{WA2}M. Bourquin {\em et al.}, Z. Phys. C {\bf 21} (1983) 1,
241: and Z. Phys. C {\bf 21} (1983) 37.
242: \bibitem{ktev}K. Arisaka {\em et al.}, KTeV design report, Fermilab report
243: FN-580, June 1992.
244: \bibitem{Solomey} N. Solomey {\em et al.\,}, ``A Proposal for Hyperon Physics at KTeV'',
245: Univ. of Chicago note EFI 93-25, April 1993.
246: \bibitem{Tony}A. A. Affolder (N. Solomey advisor), ``A Monte-Carlo Study of the
247: $\Xi^{0} \rightarrow \Sigma^{+} \hspace{0.1cm} e^{-} \hspace{0.1cm}
248: \bar{\nu}_{e}$ Decay in KTeV'', Bachelor's Thesis at the Univ. of
249: Chicago, May 1996.
250: \bibitem{Solomey2}A. Alavi-Harati {\em et al.}, ``Observation of the Decay
251: $\Xi^{0} \rightarrow \Sigma^{+} \hspace{0.1cm} \mu^{-} \hspace{0.1cm}
252: \bar{\nu}_{\mu}$'', KTeV internal report 547, August 1998.
253: \bibitem{linke}V. Linke, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 12} (1969) 669.
254: \bibitem{nick}N. Solomey, "Recent Results in Weak Hyperon Decays," in
255: {\em Kaon Physics}, ed. J.L. Rosner and B.D. Winstein (Chicago: University
256: of Chicago Press, forthcoming), chap. 44.
257: \bibitem{cbet} A. Alavi-Harati {\em et al.}, Observation of the Decay
258: $\Xi^{0} \rightarrow \Sigma^{+} \hspace{0.1cm} e^{-} \hspace{0.1cm}
259: \bar{\nu}_{e}$, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf82} (1999) 3751-3754.
260: \bibitem{wisc}A. Alavi-Harati (A. Erwin advisor),
261: ``Observation and Branching Fraction
262: Measurement of $\Xi^0 \rightarrow \Sigma^+ e^- \bar\nu$ at
263: KTeV/E799-II, Fermilab'', Ph.D. Thesis at the Univ. of Wisconsin,
264: Oct. 1999.
265: \bibitem{bright}S. Bright (R. Winston advisor),
266: ``First Measurement of Form Factors of the Beta Decay of the XI Hyperon'',
267: Ph.D. Thesis at the Univ. of Chicago, June 2000.
268: \bibitem{trd}N. Solomey, Nucl. Instrum. and Methods A{\bf419} (1998) 637-641.
269: \bibitem{pdg}Particle Data Group, C. Caso {\em et al.}, Eur. Phys. J.
270: C{\bf 3} (1998) 1.
271: \bibitem{Marlon}M. Francis (E. Monnier advisor), ``Measuring the Mass of
272: the $\Xi^{0}$ in KTeV'', Undergraduate Thesis work at the Univ. of
273: Chicago, August 1998.
274: \bibitem{NA48}V. Fanti {\em et al.}, Eur. Phys. J. C {\bf 12} (2000) 69-76.
275: \bibitem{Pietryko}C. Pietrykowski (N. Solomey advisor), ``Study of
276: $\Xi^0$ Decays for an Improved Lifetime Measurement with KTeV'',
277: Undergraduate Thesis work at the Univ. of Chicago, August 1999.
278: \end{thebibliography}
279: \end{document}
280:
281:
282:
283:
284:
285:
286:
287:
288:
289:
290:
291:
292:
293:
294:
295:
296:
297:
298:
299:
300:
301: