1: %%%%%%%%%% espcrc2.tex %%%%%%%%%%
2: %
3: % $Id: espcrc2.tex 1.1 1999/07/26 10:28:22 Simon Exp spepping $
4: %
5: \documentclass[twoside,epsfig]{article}
6: \usepackage{fleqn,espcrc2}
7:
8: % change this to the following line for use with LaTeX2.09
9: %\documentstyle[twoside,fleqn,epsfig,espcrc2]{article}
10: %\small
11: % if you want to include PostScript figures
12: \usepackage{epsfig}
13: %\usepackage{graphicx}
14: % if you have landscape tables
15: %\usepackage[figuresright]{rotating}
16:
17: % put your own definitions here:
18: % \newcommand{\cZ}{\cal{Z}}
19: % \newtheorem{def}{Definition}[section]
20: % ...
21: %\newcommand{\ttbs}{\char'134}
22: %\newcommand{\AmS}{{\protect\the\textfont2
23: % A\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox{M}\kern-.125emS}}
24: %\newcommand{\lsim}{\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0pt \rlap
25: % {\raise.2ex\hbox{$<$}}}
26: % \lower.9ex\hbox{\kern-.190em $\sim$}}}
27: %\newcommand{\gsim}{\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0pt \rlap
28: % {\raise.2ex\hbox{$>$}}}
29: % \lower.9ex\hbox{\kern-.190em $\sim$}}}
30:
31: % add words to TeX's hyphenation exception list
32: \hyphenation{author another created financial paper re-commend-ed Post-Script}
33:
34: % declarations for front matter
35: \title{First Neutrino Observations from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory}
36:
37: \author{A.B. McDonald, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada\\ For the SNO
38: Collaboration$^a$}
39:
40: \begin{document}
41: %\small
42: \begin{abstract}
43: The first neutrino observations from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory are
44: presented from preliminary analyses. Based on energy, direction and location,
45: the data in the region of interest appear to be dominated by $^{8}$B solar neutrinos,
46: detected by the charged current reaction on deuterium and elastic scattering
47: from electrons, with very little background. Measurements of radioactive
48: backgrounds indicate that the measurement of all active neutrino types via the
49: neutral current reaction on deuterium will be possible with small systematic
50: uncertainties. Quantitative results for the fluxes observed with these reactions
51: will be provided when further calibrations have been completed.
52: \vspace{1pc}
53: \end{abstract}
54:
55: % typeset front matter (including abstract)
56: \maketitle
57:
58:
59: \section{INTRODUCTION}
60: This paper presents the first neutrino observations from the Sudbury Neutrino
61: Observatory \cite{One} (SNO), a 1000 tonne heavy-water-based Cerenkov detector situated
62: 2 km underground in INCO's Creighton mine near Sudbury, Ontario, Canada. The SNO
63: detector has been filled with water since May, 1999. After a commissioning
64: period, the detector parameters were fixed at the start of November 1999 and
65: neutrino data acquisition and associated calibrations have been taking place
66: almost continuously since then. In this initial phase of the project, the
67: detector is filled with pure heavy water. Neutrinos from $^{8}$B decay in the sun
68: are observed from Cerenkov processes following these reactions:
69: \\
70: 1. The Charged Current (CC) reaction, specific to electron neutrinos:
71:
72: \begin{equation}
73: d + \nu_{e} \rightarrow p + p + e^{-} \nonumber
74: \end{equation}
75:
76: This reaction has a Q value of -1.4 MeV and the electron energy is strongly
77: correlated with the neutrino energy, providing very good sensitivity to spectral
78: distortions.
79: \\
80: 2. Neutral Current (NC) reaction, equally sensitive to all non-sterile neutrino
81: types:
82:
83: \begin{equation}
84: \nu_{x} + d \rightarrow n + p + \nu_{x} \nonumber
85: \end{equation}
86:
87: This reaction has a threshold of 2.2 MeV and is observed through the detection
88: of neutrons by three different techniques in separate phases of the experiment.
89: \\
90: 3. Elastic Scattering (ES) reaction:
91: \begin{equation}
92: \nu_{x} + e^{-} \rightarrow e^{-} + \nu_{x} \nonumber
93: \end{equation}
94: This reaction has a substantially lower cross section than the other two and is
95: predominantly sensitive to electron neutrinos; they have about six times greater
96: cross-section than $\mu$ or $\tau$ neutrinos.
97:
98: The reaction:
99:
100: \begin{equation}
101: \bar\nu_{e} + d \rightarrow n + n + e^{+}
102: \end{equation}
103: also provides a unique signature for anti-electron neutrinos from various
104: possible sources.
105: \\
106: The SNO experimental plan calls for three phases of about one year each wherein
107: different techniques will be employed for the detection of neutrons from the NC
108: reaction. During the first phase, with pure heavy water, neutrons are observed
109: through the Cerenkov light produced when neutrons are captured in deuterium,
110: producing 6.25 MeV gammas. In this phase, the capture probability for such
111: neutrons is about 25\% and the Cerenkov light is relatively close to the
112: threshold of about 5 MeV electron energy, imposed by radioactivity in the
113: detector. (Figure 1). For the second phase, about 2.5 tonnes of NaCl will be
114: added to the heavy water and neutron detection will be enhanced through capture
115: on Cl, with about 8.6 MeV gamma energy release and about 83\% capture efficiency.
116: (See Figure 1). For the third phase, the salt is removed and an array of $^{3}$He-
117: filled proportional counters will be installed to provide direct detection of
118: neutrons with a capture efficiency of about 45\%.
119:
120:
121:
122: \section{PHYSICS OBJECTIVES}
123: The main physics goals for the Observatory are observations of:
124: \\
125: - Solar Neutrinos
126: \\
127: - Atmospheric Neutrinos
128: \\
129: - Supernova Neutrinos
130: \\
131: - Cosmic Ray Muons
132: \\
133: - Anti-electron neutrinos from various processes including transformations of
134: solar neutrinos or relic supernova neutrinos.
135: \\
136:
137: For Solar Neutrinos, the combination of three detection reactions provides
138: several sensitive ways to seek evidence for neutrino flavor change without
139: relying on calculations of initial fluxes from solar models. The ratio of
140: neutrino fluxes above a threshold, as observed by the CC and NC reactions
141: provides a very sensitive way to observe transformations to active neutrinos.
142:
143: \begin{figure}[ht]
144: \begin{center}
145: \mbox{\epsfig{file=fig1.eps,height=7cm}}
146: %\mbox{\includegraphics[height=5cm]{full_log_bw.eps}}
147: \caption{Simulations of spectra obtained from the three detection reactions
148: (CC,ES,NC)for neutrino fluxes as calculated\cite{Two} by BP98. Spectra from the NC
149: reaction are shown for pure heavy water and with added salt. The expected
150: counting rate from U and Th radioactivity in the water is also shown. An MeV of
151: electron energy corresponds to about 9 photomultipliers (PMT's) hit.}
152: \end{center}
153: \end{figure}
154:
155: The ratio of CC/NC can be observed during all three phases of operation. The
156: sensitivity to the NC reaction is limited during the first phase, but there will
157: be excellent sensitivity with different systematic uncertainties during the
158: other two phases. The ratio of fluxes detected by the CC and ES reaction has a
159: smaller dependence on flavor change to active species through the sensitivity to
160: $\mu$ and $\tau$ neutrinos in the ES cross section.
161: Events from the CC and ES reactions can be distinguished through the very
162: different directional response. The ES reaction is strongly peaked away from the
163: Sun, whereas the CC reaction has a form of approximately $1 - 1/3$ cos$ \theta_{sun}$,
164: with about a factor of two difference in rate between forward and backward
165: directions relative to the Sun. The angular resolution of the detector is better
166: than 25 degrees. The NC rate may be determined during the pure D$_2$O phase partly
167: through a distinctive variation as a function of radius. However, the definition
168: of the number of events observed with this reaction is clearly enhanced by the
169: addition of salt (see Figure 1), and will be determined independently of the
170: Cerenkov signals when the $^{3}$He-filled proportional counters are installed. The
171: observed spectrum for the CC reaction is a very sensitive indicator of
172: distortions caused by the MSW effect\cite{Three} because the energy of outgoing electrons
173: is strongly correlated with the incoming neutrino energy and the detector energy
174: resolution is better than 20\% for the range of interest.
175: With the relatively high statistical accuracy indicated by Figure 1, the SNO
176: detector will also provide sensitive measurements of the solar neutrino flux as
177: a function of zenith angle to search for MSW regeneration in the Earth.
178: Correlations between flux, energy spectrum, zenith angle and time of year will
179: also be studied. With the variety of reactions to be studied, the SNO detector
180: can explore oscillations via the MSW effect or vacuum oscillation processes over the
181: full range of parameters consistent with previous experiments. It could provide
182: clear evidence for electron neutrino flavor change, including transformations to
183: either active or sterile types.
184:
185: \section{DETECTOR PERFORMANCE}
186: The SNO detector consists of 1000 tonnes of pure D$_2$O contained within an
187: acrylic vessel (12 m diameter, 5 cm thick), viewed by 9438 PMT's mounted on a
188: geodesic structure 18 m in diameter, all contained within a polyurethane-coated
189: barrel-shaped cavity (22m diameter by 34 m high). The cavity volume outside the
190: acrylic vessel (AV) is filled with purified H$_2$O. There are 91 PMT's looking
191: outward from the geodesic structure, viewing the outer H$_2$O volume.
192: \\
193: The SNO detector has been full of water since May, 1999.
194: During the period until
195: November, 1999, detailed commissioning tests and calibrations were performed.
196: There has been no substantial problem from electrical breakdown of high voltage
197: connectors submerged in light water since nitrogen was added to the degassed
198: water. During the period before November, a variety of adjustments were made to
199: improve the light sensitivity by about 25\% and to reduce the trigger threshold
200: to about 2 MeV. Four additional PMT's were installed in the neck of the acrylic
201: vessel to provide a clear indication of instrumental light emitted in this
202: region, probably from static discharges of insulating materials. $^{222}$Rn gas in
203: the air above the heavy water was reduced to acceptable levels by flushing with
204: boil-off gas from liquid nitrogen.
205: \\
206: As of November, 1999, the desired detector specifications had been met, the
207: detector
208: parameters were frozen and production data accumulation was started,
209: interspersed with a variety of calibration measurements. The detector
210: performance has been very good, with more than 98.5\% of all channels
211: operational; a total event rate of less than 5 Hz above a threshold of about 20
212: hit PMT's; PMT individual noise rates of less than 500 Hz for a threshold of
213: about 0.3 photoelectrons, providing fewer than 2 noise hits per event.
214: \\
215: \section{CALIBRATION}
216:
217: Detector calibration is being carried out with a variety of techniques and
218: sources. Electronic calibrations of pedestals, slopes and timing are performed
219: regularly with pulsers. The 600,000 electronic constants are very stable.
220: Optical properties of the detector have been studied using a diffusing ball,
221: (Laserball) receiving light from a pulsed laser system providing wavelengths
222: between 337 and 700 nm with variable intensity at repetition rates from near 0
223: to 45 Hz. This source and other calibration sources are moved within the D$_2$O
224: volume using a manipulator system capable of positioning them to better than 5
225: cm. Positions in the H$_2$O volume between the D$_2$O and the PMT's are also
226: accessible along vertical paths from above. A nearly mono-energetic $^{16}$N gamma
227: ray source has also been deployed.
228:
229:
230: \begin{figure}[!ht]
231: \begin{center}
232: \mbox{\epsfig{file=fig2.eps,width=8cm}}
233: \caption{Data from the $^{16}$N source compared with Monte Carlo simulation. Neff is the number of PMTs hit by prompt light less the average number of noise hits.}
234: \end{center}
235: \end{figure}
236:
237:
238: Figure 2 shows a spectrum from the $^{16}$N source compared with a Monte Carlo
239: simulation, using optical parameters extracted
240: from a preliminary analysis of the laserball data. A single constant
241: corresponding to the average quantum efficiency of the PMT's has been adjusted
242: to match the centroid of these spectra. A further comparison of centroids for
243: over 20 other locations throughout the D$_2$O volume showed less than 2\%
244: difference between the data and the simulation at any point. An acrylic-
245: encapsulated $^{242}$Cf fission neutron source has also been deployed to study the
246: neutron response of the detector. \\
247: Other sources being prepared include a 19.8 MeV gamma source produced by the
248: (p,t) reaction, a triggered source for the $^{232}$Th and $^{238}$U chains producing
249: 2.6 and 2.4 MeV gammas and a source of $^{8}$Li, emitting betas up to 13 MeV. The
250: short-lived $^{16}$N and $^{8}$Li activities are produced by a pulsed neutron
251: generator located near the SNO detector and are transported via capillary tubing
252: to decay chambers within the detector volume.
253:
254: \section{OBSERVATIONS TO DATE}
255:
256: In addition to Cerenkov light produced by neutrinos and radioactivity, there can
257: be other sources of "instrumental light" arising from parts of the detector.
258: For example, it is well known that PMT's can occasionally emit light, perhaps
259: through internal electrical discharges. Light from these sources has very
260: different characteristics from the typical patterns observed for Cerenkov light at
261: solar neutrino energies. The light from a flashing PMT shows an early trigger
262: for the flashing PMT, followed by light observed across the detector, at least
263: 70 ns later. For SNO, six or more electronic channels surrounding the flashing
264: PMT typically show pickup signals, distinguishing the events further from
265: Cerenkov events. \\
266: Figure 3 shows the raw spectrum of events (solid line) observed
267: with the detector for a fraction of the data obtained since the start of data
268: taking in November, 1999. The events are plotted against NHIT, the number of
269: PMT's contained in a 400 ns second window surrounding the detector trigger (more
270: than about 20 PMT's hit within a 100 ns window). NHIT is approximately
271: proportional to the electron energy for a Cerenkov event, with about 9 NHIT
272: corresponding to 1 MeV. Only a fraction of the data have been shown as the
273: remainder are being saved for a comparison after the cuts have been fully
274: defined.
275:
276:
277: \begin{figure}[!ht]
278: \begin{center}
279: \mbox{\epsfig{file=fig3.eps,width=7cm}}
280: \caption{Progression of instrumental cuts.}
281: \end{center}
282: \end{figure}
283:
284: The dashed line shows the residual data after cuts have been imposed to remove
285: events that show characteristics matching the Flashing PMT's. The dotted line
286: shows the residual data after further cuts are imposed to remove another class
287: of events associated with bursts of light from the neck region of the detector.
288: These events may arise from static discharges of insulating materials. Four
289: additional PMT's were installed in this region in September, 1999. They clearly
290: observe these events and are very insensitive to light generated in the detector
291: itself, as determined from the calibration sources. The dot and dash line shows
292: the residual events after the imposition of further cuts which eliminate events
293: that show characteristics of pickup in the electronic systems.
294:
295: Two separate groups within the SNO Collaboration developed a series of cuts to
296: eliminate these instrumental light sources and their results for the residual
297: spectrum were virtually identical, lending confidence in the robustness with
298: which these events can be distinguished from neutrinos.
299: To ensure that these cuts do not remove a significant number of neutrino events,
300: the fraction of signal loss was tested with the $^{16}$N source. The results are
301: shown in Figure 4, indicating very low loss of signal in the region tested.
302: \vspace{1pc}
303: \begin{figure}[!ht]
304: \begin{center}
305: \mbox{\epsfig{file=fig4.eps,width=6cm}}
306: \caption{Signal loss as measured with $^{16}$N.}
307: \end{center}
308: \end{figure}
309:
310:
311: Following these cuts, algorithms based on timing and spatial information were
312: used to reconstruct the position and direction of the events.
313: Figure 5 shows the resulting spectrum for a large fiducial volume.
314:
315: \begin{figure}[!ht]
316: \begin{center}
317: \mbox{\epsfig{file=fig5.eps,width=7cm}}
318: \caption{Distribution of events versus number of hit PMTs.}
319: \end{center}
320: \end{figure}
321:
322: Superimposed on the data is the simulated spectrum for the CC reaction in Figure
323: 1, scaled to the data. As the calibrations are not yet complete, the SNO
324: collaboration has chosen not to quote a number for the flux of electron
325: neutrinos measured by the CC reaction on deuterium. However, it should be
326: apparent from the figure that the spectrum is well defined so that an accurate
327: measurement will be obtained when further calibrations have been completed.
328:
329:
330: \begin{figure}[!ht]
331: \begin{center}
332: \mbox{\epsfig{file=fig6.eps,width=6cm}}
333: \caption{Distribution of events versus cos$ \theta_{sun}$.}
334: \end{center}
335: \end{figure}
336:
337: Figure 6 shows events as a function of the direction to the sun for a lower
338: energy threshold and a larger fiducial volume. Even with somewhat more
339: radioactive background included by these parameter choices, the peak at cos$ \theta_{sun} = 1$ from the ES reaction is apparent.
340:
341: \begin{figure}[!ht]
342: \begin{center}
343: \mbox{\epsfig{file=fig7.eps,width=6cm}}
344: \caption{Distribution of events versus radius cubed.}
345: \end{center}
346: \end{figure}
347:
348: Figure 7 shows the distribution of events as a function of (radius/600cm)$^3$,
349: for a high-energy threshold. The radius of the AV is 600 cm, so the heavy water
350: volume corresponds to values less than 1. It is apparent that there is a clear
351: excess of events in this region, indicating the substantial contribution from
352: the CC reaction on deuterium.
353:
354: \begin{figure}[!ht]
355: \begin{center}
356: \mbox{\epsfig{file=fig8.eps,width=6cm}}
357: \caption{Distribution of events in H$_2$O versus cos$ \theta_{sun}$.}
358: \end{center}
359: \end{figure}
360:
361:
362: Figure 8 shows the distribution of events with a high energy threshold for a
363: region in the light water outside the AV. Events have been selected to remove
364: inward-coming gamma rays. The peak from ES events is apparent with a relatively
365: small background.
366:
367: \section{RADIOACTIVE BACKGROUNDS}
368: Radioactive backgrounds that contribute to the Cerenkov light in the detector
369: arise from the decay chains of $^{238}$U and $^{232}$Th impurities in the
370: water and other detector materials. At low energies, the dominant contributions
371: come from impurities in the water. These contributions can be measured through
372: the radioassay of the light and heavy water. They can also be measured
373: independently through observation of the low energy region of the Cerenkov
374: spectrum for events reconstructing in the water regions. Sensitive techniques
375: have been developed for radioassay of $^{224}$Ra, $^{226}$Ra and $^{222}$Rn in the water. The
376: measurements for Ra are performed by extracting the Ra on beads coated with
377: manganese oxide or on ultrafiltration membranes coated with hydrous titanium
378: oxide. After sampling hundreds of tonnes of water, these materials are measured
379: for radioactive decay of the Ra with techniques sensitive to tens of atoms. (see
380: reference\cite{One} for more details) The $^{222}$Rn is measured by degassing 50 or more tonnes
381: of water and collecting the Rn gas with liquid nitrogen-cooled traps. The
382: collected gas is then counted with ZnS coated scintillation cells (Lucas cells)
383: to observe the alpha decays.
384: These techniques have been employed to make very sensitive measurements of the
385: water, as shown in Figures 9 and 10.
386:
387:
388: \begin{figure}[!ht]
389: \begin{center}
390: \mbox{\epsfig{file=fig9.eps,height=7cm}}
391: \caption{Measurements of Radium from the Th and U chains and Radon from the U
392: chain in H$_2$O.}
393: \end{center}
394: \end{figure}
395:
396: The Cerenkov light generated by the Th and U radioactivity can be observed at
397: low energies as illustrated in figure 1 and observed in figures 3 and 5. As the
398: decay products and sequence are different for the two chains it is also possible to use
399: pattern recognition to obtain a statistical separation of the contributions from
400: the two chains. Future calibrations will include the use of proportional
401: counters containing Th and U chain sources to provide triggered events to
402: calibrate the detector response in this region. However, the data to date, with
403: large calibration uncertainties, do agree with the radioassay measurements.
404: The light water in the SNO detector is designed to attenuate higher energy gamma
405: rays (fission and alpha-induced) from radioactivity in the cavity walls and the
406: PMT support structure. High-energy events reconstructed in the light water
407: volume outside the AV are found to be predominantly inward going and the numbers
408: decrease rapidly as a function of radius. Using calibration data from the $^{16}$N
409: source positioned near the PMT's, extrapolations of the number of high energy
410: gammas interacting within the D$_2$O volume indicate that fewer than a few percent
411: of the events above NHIT = 60 in Figure 5 arise from external high energy
412: gammas.
413: In addition to the contributions to Cerenkov light, the presence of Th and U
414: chain elements can produce a background for the NC reaction through the
415: photodisintegration of deuterium by 2.6 MeV gammas from the Th chain and 2.4 MeV
416: gammas from the U chain. The horizontal lines in Figure 10 individually
417: represent contributions to the neutron background in the detector from
418: photodisintegration equivalent to 5\% of the signal expected for the NC reaction
419: for the neutrino flux\cite{Two} of BP98. As is apparent from the figure, these goals
420: have been met for the U chain and are met within a factor of two for the Th
421: chain.
422:
423: \begin{figure}[!ht]
424: \begin{center}
425: \mbox{\epsfig{file=fig10.eps,height=7cm}}
426: \caption{Measurements of Radium from the Th and U chains and Radon from the U
427: chain in D$_2$O.}
428: \end{center}
429: \end{figure}
430:
431: \section{CONCLUSIONS}
432: Based on energy, direction and location information, the data in the regions of
433: interest in Figures 5 to 8 appear to be dominated by $^{8}$B solar neutrino events
434: observed with the CC and ES reactions, with very little background. This implies
435: that measurements during the pure heavy water phase will provide an accurate
436: measurement of the electron neutrino flux via the CC reaction after completion
437: of further calibrations. The measurements of radioactivity imply that the NC
438: measurements can be made with only a small uncertainty from the radioactive
439: background.
440:
441: \section{Acknowledgments}
442: This research has been financially supported in Canada by the Natural Sciences
443: and Engineering Research Council, Industry Canada, National Research
444: Council of Canada, Northern Ontario Heritage Fund Corporation and
445: the Province of Ontario, in the United States
446: by the Department of Energy, and in the
447: United Kingdom by the Science and Engineering Research Council and the
448: Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council. Further support was provided by INCO,
449: Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL),
450: Agra-Monenco, Canatom, Canadian Microelectronics Corporation and Northern
451: Telecom. The heavy water has been loaned by
452: AECL with the cooperation of Ontario Hydro.
453: The provision of INCO of an underground site is greatly appreciated.
454:
455: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
456:
457:
458: \bibitem{One} J. Boger et al, Nucl.Instrum.Meth. A449 (2000) 172-207.
459:
460: \bibitem{Two} J.N. Bahcall, S. Basu and M. H. Pinsonneault, Phys. Lett. B433
461: (1998) 1.
462:
463:
464: \bibitem{Three} L. Wolfenstein, Phys. Rev. D17 (1978) 2369; S.P. Mikheyev and
465: A.Y. Smirnov, Sov. Jour. Nucl. Phys. 42 (1985) 913.
466:
467:
468:
469: \end{thebibliography}
470: %\small
471: $^a$The SNO Collaboration includes: M. G. Boulay, E. Bonvin, M. Chen, F. A.
472: Duncan, E. D. Earle, H. C. Evans, G.T. Ewan, R. J. Ford, A. L. Hallin, P. J.
473: Harvey, J. D. Hepburn, C. Jillings, H. W. Lee, J. R. Leslie, H. B. Mak, A. B.
474: McDonald, W. McLatchie, B. A. Moffat, B.C. Robertson, P. Skensved, B. Sur, {\bf Queen's
475: University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada.}; I. Blevis, F. Dalnoki-Veress, W.
476: Davidson, J. Farine, D.R. Grant, C. K. Hargrove, I. Levine, K. McFarlane, T.
477: Noble, V.M. Novikov, M. O'Neill, M. Shatkay, C. Shewchuk, D. Sinclair, {\bf Carleton
478: University, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada.}; T. Andersen, M.C. Chon, P. Jagam,
479: J. Law, I.T. Lawson, R. W. Ollerhead, J. J. Simpson, N. Tagg, J.X. Wang, {\bf University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada.}; J. Bigu, J.H.M. Cowan, E.
480: D. Hallman, R. U. Haq, J. Hewett, J.G. Hykawy, G. Jonkmans, A. Roberge, E.
481: Saettler, M.H. Schwendener, H. Seifert, R. Tafirout, C. J. Virtue, {\bf Laurentian
482: University, Sudbury, Ontario P3E 2C6, Canada.}; S. Gil, J. Heise, R. Helmer,
483: R.J. Komar, T. Kutter, C.W. Nally, H.S. Ng, R. Schubank,,Y. Tserkovnyak, C.E.
484: Waltham, {\bf University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada.}; E. W.
485: Beier, D. F. Cowen, E. D. Frank, W. Frati, P.T. Keener, J. R. Klein, C. Kyba, D.
486: S. McDonald, M.S.Neubauer, F. M. Newcomer, V. Rusu, R. Van Berg, R. G. Van de
487: Water, P. Wittich, {\bf University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.}; T.
488: J. Bowles, S. J. Brice, M. Dragowsky, M. M. Fowler, A. Goldschmidt, A. Hamer, A.
489: Hime, K. Kirch, J. B. Wilhelmy, J. M. Wouters, {\bf Los Alamos National Laboratory,
490: Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.}; Y. D. Chan, X. Chen, M.C.P. Isaac, K. T. Lesko, A.D.
491: Marino, E.B. Norman, C.E. Okada, A.W. P. Poon, A. R. Smith, A. Schuelke, R. G.
492: Stokstad, {\bf Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.}; Q. R.
493: Ahmad, M. C. Browne, T.V. Bullard, P. J. Doe, C. A. Duba, S. R. Elliott, R.
494: Fardon, J.V. Germani, A. A. Hamian, K. M. Heeger, R. Meijer Drees, J. Orrell, R.
495: G. H. Robertson, K. Schaffer, M. W. E. Smith, T. D. Steiger, J. F. Wilkerson,
496: {\bf University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.}; J. C. Barton, S.Biller, R.
497: Black, R. Boardman, M. Bowler, J. Cameron, B. Cleveland, G. Doucas, Ferraris, H.
498: Fergami, K.Frame, H. Heron, C. Howard, N. A. Jelley, A. B. Knox, M. Lay,W.
499: Locke, J. Lyon, N. McCaulay, S. Majerus, G. MacGregor, M. Moorhead, M. Omori, N.
500: W. Tanner, R. Taplin, M. Thorman, P. T. Trent, D. L.Wark, N. West, {\bf University
501: of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3NP, United Kingdom.}; J. Boger, R. L Hahn, J.K. Rowley,
502: M. Yeh {\bf Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973-5000, USA.}; R.G. Allen,
503: G. Buhler, H.H. Chen (Deceased), {\bf University of California, Irvine, CA 92717,
504: USA.}
505:
506:
507: \end{document}.
508:
509:
510:
511: