1: \documentstyle[fleqn,epsfig]{aipproc}

2: 

3: \begin{document}

4: \title{Neutral Hyperon and \\ H-Dibaryon Results from KTeV}

5: 

6: \author{Nickolas Solomey}

7: \address{Enrico Fermi Institute, The University of Chicago, Illinois

8: 60637}

9: 

10: \maketitle

11: 

12: \begin{abstract}

13: Results from the KTeV experiment at Fermilab using

14: $\Xi^0$ hyperons are presented, 

15: especially the first form-factor (FF) measurement from its semi-leptonic 

16: decay. This decay, which is an important test of the Standard Model, was 

17: observed for the first time using the 1997 KTeV experiment.

18: We also report on the analysis of a large samples of $\Xi^0$ weak

19: radiative

20: decays, and a search for the decay of a lightly bound $H^0$ dibaryon.

21: \end{abstract}

22: 

23: \section*{Introduction}

24: The KTeV experiment is a neutral beam experiment produced by 

25: protons from the Tevatron

26: accelerator at 800 GeV/c impinging on a target at a 4.8 mrad angle. The

27: fiducial decay volume starts 90 m down stream of a target because of the

28: space needed to collimate the neutral beam which is where

29: most of the neutral particles decay and is also the location of

30: the sweeping magnetics that eliminate the charged

31: particles. The decay volume

32: from 90 to 160 m from the target is an ultra high vacuum to reduce 

33: interactions and has scintillator ring counters to veto those events where

34: the

35: particles have left the fiducial volume.

36: A spectrometer consisting of tracking chambers, an analysis magnet,

37: electromagnetic calorimetry (CsI) \cite{roodman}, particle identification 

38: by transition radiation detectors (TRD) \cite{solomey}, and a muon counter 

39: system with 5 m of iron filter directly follows the decay volume. 

40: 

41: Data was collected in 16 triggers for two different experimental

42: configurations in 1997 and

43: 1999. A rare kaon decay program E799 \cite{sashaL,eva}, and the search for

44: direct 

45: CP violation E832 \cite{sashaG} are presented elsewhere in these

46: proceedings.

47: Presented here are part of the results from a neutral hyperon program that

48: had three triggers in the E799 experiment configuration, 

49: and limited to the results from the 1997 run.

50: 

51: \section*{Physics Analysis}

52: Physics results from the KTeV hyperon program are:

53: \vspace{0.15cm}

54: \paragraph*{Semi-leptonic Decays:}

55: Neutral hyperon semi-leptonic decays accessible in KTeV are the

56: beta-decay $\Xi^0 \rightarrow \Sigma^+ \hspace{0.1cm} e^{-} \hspace{0.1cm}

57: \bar{\nu}_{e}$, and muon decay $\Xi^0 \rightarrow \Sigma^+ \hspace{0.1cm} 

58: \mu^- \hspace{0.1cm} \bar{\nu}_{\mu}$.

59: They are important to study for their weak decay FF which give an 

60: understanding of their underlying structure. 

61: In the V-A formulation the transition amplitude for the beta decay is:

62: \begin{equation}M = \frac{G}{\sqrt{2}}

63: <\Sigma|J^{\lambda}|\Xi>{\bar{u}_{e}} 

64: \gamma_{\lambda} (1 + \gamma_{5}) u_{\nu} \end{equation}

65: The V-A hadronic current can be written as:

66: \begin{eqnarray*} <\Sigma|J^{\lambda}|\Xi> = {\cal C} \hspace{0.1cm} i 

67: \hspace{0.2cm}

68: \bar{u}(\Sigma) & [ & f_{1}\gamma^{\lambda}

69: + f_{2} \frac{\sigma^{\lambda \upsilon}\gamma_{\upsilon}}{M_{\Xi}} +

70: f_{3} q^{\lambda} \frac{M_e}{M_{\Xi}} + \\

71: & [ & g_{1} \gamma^{\lambda} + g_{2} 

72: \frac{\sigma^{\lambda \upsilon} \gamma_{\upsilon}}{M_{\Xi}} + 

73: g_{3} q^{\lambda}  \frac{M_e}{M_{\Xi}} ]

74: \hspace{0.1cm} \gamma_{5} \hspace{0.25cm} ] u(\Xi) 

75: \hspace{1.9cm} (2) \end{eqnarray*}

76: where ${\cal C}$ is the CKM matrix element, and $q$ is the momentum

77: transfer.

78: There are 3 vector FF: $f_1$ (vector), $f_2$ (weak magnetism) and

79: $f_3$ (an induced scaler); plus 3 axial-vector FF: $g_1$ (axial vector),

80: $g_2$ (weak electricity) and $g_3$ (an induced pseudo-scaler). All six

81: FF are real if time reversal invariance is valid. The quark

82: model predicts a nonzero but small $g_2$ FF if SU(3) breaking is

83: sizable, but the standard model assumes this FF is zero. The

84: FF $f_3$ and $g_3$ for the beta decay, are expected to be large

85: (i.e. $\frac{g_3}{g_1}\sim$8), but it is multiplied by

86: $\frac{M_e}{M_{\Xi}}$

87: making this term negligably small so as not to contribute any noticeable 

88: effect, but for the muon decay this may no longer be assumed. Furthermore,

89: neither of these decays had previously been observed so measuring their

90: branching ratio was also important as a test of the standard model, and

91: in the case of the muon decay this could be the first place to look

92: for a $g_3$ FF. The final results for the beta decay are a 

93: branching ratio of (2.60~$\pm$0.11~$\pm$0.16)~$\times$~10$^{-4}$,

94: based on 626 events where the first error is statistical and the second 

95: systematic, and the theoretical expected is 2.6~$\times$~10$^{-4}$.

96: For the muon decay its preliminary branching ratio is

97: (3.5~$^{+2.0}_{-1.0}$~$^{+0.5}_{-1.0}$)~$\times$~10$^{-6}$ based on 5

98: events,

99: again the first error is statistical and the second systematic, while

100: the asymmetric error bars are from the small number of events and poisson

101: statistics at the 68\% C.I. \cite{feldman}; theoretical expected is

102: 2.6~$\times$~10$^{-6}$.

103: \begin{figure}[h]

104: \begin{center}

105: \mbox{

106: \epsfig{file=bkg.eps,%

107: height=0.47\linewidth}

108: }

109: \mbox{

110: \epsfig{file=mk1d.ps,%

111: height=0.47\linewidth}

112: }

113: \end{center}

114: \caption{On the left is the $\Xi^0$ beta decay compared to its 

115: normalized MC and possible backgrounds, and on the right is the

116: angular distribution in the $\Sigma^+$ reference frame of the

117: angular asymmetry of the proton to electron, reconstructed 

118: neutrino and between the reconstructed neutrino and the electron.}

119: \label{beta}

120: \end{figure}

121: 

122: A very clean sample of $\Xi^0$ beta decays, see figure \ref{beta} left,

123: was obtained by using the TRD detector. The decays of the $\Sigma^+$

124: has a 98\% analyzing power, and this fact makes its equivalent to a fully

125: polarized beam. However, spin alignment magnetics gave

126: the ability to control this and then test the technique on the much 

127: bigger normal mode decays: $\Xi^0 \rightarrow \Lambda^0 \pi^0$. By working

128: in the $\Sigma^+$ reference frame all of the FF could be

129: devised by measuring the angular distribution of the proton relative

130: to the electron, neutrino (we typically use the reconstructed 

131: transverse neutrino direction)

132: see figure \ref{beta} right, as well as test the technique by comparing

133: the

134: proton direction relative to the reconstructed $\Xi^0$. The final four 

135: FF are: $f_1 = 0.99 \pm 0.14$, $\frac{g_1}{f_1}=1.24 \pm 0.27$,

136: $\frac{f_2}{f_1}=2.3 \pm 1.3$, and $\frac{g_2}{f_1}= -1.4 \pm 2.1$;

137: here this analysis used the previously quoted branching ratio, and

138: permitted

139: the $g_2$ FF to float. The $g_2$ FF is consistent with

140: zero and in another analysis it was constrained to be zero and the

141: FF reanalyzed and they essentially remained unchanged.

142: \vspace{0.15cm}

143: \paragraph*{Radiative Decays:}

144: Neutral hyperon radiative decays accessible in KTeV are:

145: $\Xi^0 \rightarrow \Sigma^0 \gamma$ and

146: $\Xi^0 \rightarrow \Lambda^0 \hspace{0.1cm} \gamma$. 

147: Although these decays are not simple first-order processes but 

148: actually proceed

149: threw complicated diagrams, they are important to study because

150: they are difficult to calculate, but yet have high

151: branching ratios. Furthermore, the angular emission of the high

152: energy gamma relative to the hyperon polarization can be related

153: to the underlying mechanism of its decay as a test of various 

154: theories. The decay $\Xi^0 \rightarrow \Sigma^+ \gamma$ in KTeV is 

155: identified when a second

156: radiative decay of $\Sigma^0 \rightarrow \Lambda^0 \gamma$ and 

157: then for both radiative decays of the $\Xi^0$ 

158: through the charged particle decay of $\Lambda^0 \rightarrow p^+ \pi^-$. 

159: As with the semi-leptonic decays the self analyzing power with hyperon 

160: decays permits the polarization to be determined relative to the gamma

161: angular 

162: distribution. The final results for the 

163: radiative decay $\Xi^0 \rightarrow \Sigma^0 \gamma$ is a 

164: branching ratio of (3.34~$\pm$0.05~$\pm$0.11)~$\times$~10$^{-3}$,

165: based on 4048 events, shown in figure \ref{wrhd} left, 

166: where the first error is statistical and the second 

167: systematic. The angular

168: distribution of the gamma relative to the $\Xi^0$ polarization vector;

169: is -0.65 $\pm$0.13, see figure \ref{wrhd} right.

170: The radiative decay $\Xi^0 \rightarrow \Lambda^0 \gamma$ 

171: preliminary branching ratio is 

172: (0.95~$\pm$0.03$\pm$0.09)~$\times$~10$^{-3}$ based on 1105 events.

173: \begin{figure}

174: \begin{center}

175: \mbox{

176: \epsfig{file=peak.eps,%

177: height=0.31\linewidth}

178: }

179: \mbox{

180: \epsfig{file=chi2.eps,%

181: height=0.31\linewidth}

182: }

183: \end{center}

184: \caption{On the left is the $\Xi^0 \rightarrow \Sigma^0 \gamma$ decay

185: signal 

186: compared to its normalized MC, and on the

187: right the determination of the gamma angular asymmetry.}

188: \label{wrhd}

189: \end{figure}

190: \vspace{0.15cm}

191: \paragraph*{Dibaryon Search:}

192: The KTeV hyperon data was used to search for a six quark neutral hadron

193: state

194: which has two strange, two up and two down quarks that 

195: decays $H^0 \rightarrow \Lambda^0 p^+ \pi^-$. The data used for 

196: normalizing the decay was $\Xi^0 \rightarrow \Lambda^0 \pi^0$ with the

197: decay of the $\Lambda^0 \rightarrow p^+ \pi^-$ and $\pi^0 \rightarrow e^+ 

198: e^- \gamma$. These two decays share similar technical details for their

199: analysis: two different charged particle vertices, a reconstructible

200: $\Lambda^0$ mass peak and a stiff proton. Using the 1997 data from

201: KTeV E799 run we have

202: ruled out the existence of a $H^0$ dibaryon in the mass range from

203: 2.194 to 2.231 GeV/c$^2$ for long lifetimes of 5~$\times$~10$^{-10}$ to

204: 1~$\times$~10$^{-3}$ seconds at the 90\% CI \cite{ram}.

205: 

206: \section*{Conclusions}

207: The results quoted here are the final measurements for these decays

208: from the 1997 KTeV run. Three times more data exists from

209: the 1999 run which is in the process of being analyzed. Future results

210: are planned to make improvements in all decay modes, and some decays

211: previously excluded by trigger requirements, such as: $\Xi^0 \rightarrow

212: \Lambda^0 \pi^0$ where the decay $\pi^0 \rightarrow e^+ e^- \gamma$ will

213: provide a sample of decays where the z vertex can be measured from

214: the two electrons for use in a $\Xi^0$ mass and lifetime improved 

215: measurement, the decay $\Xi^0 \rightarrow \Sigma^0 \gamma$ with the

216: special decay $\Sigma^0 \rightarrow \Lambda^0 e^+ e^-$, or the 

217: radiative decay $\Xi^0 \rightarrow \Lambda^0 \pi^0 \gamma$. All of

218: these decays are especially well suited for the excellent abilities of

219: $\pi^0$ and $\gamma$ measurements with our high precession CsI 

220: electromagnetic calorimeter, and our unmatched $\pi^{\pm}$/e$^{\pm}$

221: rejection obtained with the TRD system.

222: 

223: \begin{references}

224: \bibitem{roodman}R.S. Kessler {\em et al.}, Nucl. Instrum. Meth.

225: A{\bf368} (1996) 653.

226: \bibitem{solomey}N. Solomey, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 419 (1998) 637.

227: \bibitem{sashaL}See A. Ledovskoy these proceedings.

228: \bibitem{eva}See E. Halkiadakis these proceedings.

229: \bibitem{sashaG}See A. Glazov these proceedings.

230: \bibitem{feldman}G.J. Feldman and R.D. Cousins, Phys. Rev. D{\bf 57}

231: (1998) 3873.

232: \bibitem{ram}A. Alavi-Harati {\em et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. 

233: {\bf 84} (2000) 2593.

234: \end{references}

235:  

236: \end{document}

237: