1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% file template.tex %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %
3: % This is a template file for The European Physical Journal
4: %
5: % Copy it to a new file with a new name and use it as the basis
6: % for your article
7: %
8: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Springer-Verlag %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
9:
10: %
11: \begin{filecontents}{leer.eps}
12: %!PS-Adobe-2.0 EPSF-2.0
13: %%CreationDate: Mon Jul 13 16:51:17 1992
14: %%DocumentFonts: (atend)
15: %%Pages: 0 1
16: %%BoundingBox: 72 31 601 342
17: %%EndComments
18:
19: gsave
20: 72 31 moveto
21: 72 342 lineto
22: 601 342 lineto
23: 601 31 lineto
24: 72 31 lineto
25: showpage
26: grestore
27: %%Trailer
28: %%DocumentFonts: Helvetica
29: \end{filecontents}
30: %
31: %\documentclass[epj,referee]{svjour}
32: \documentclass[epj,final]{svjour}
33: %\documentclass[epj,draft]{svjour}
34: % Remove option referee for final version
35: %
36: % Remove any % below to load the required packages
37: %\usepackage{latexsym}
38: \usepackage{graphics}
39: % etc
40: %
41: \begin{document}
42: %
43: \title{Nonmesonic decay of the $\Lambda$-hyperon\\
44: in hypernuclei produced by p+Au collisions}
45: %
46: %\subtitle{Do you have a subtitle?\\ If so, write it here}
47: %
48: %
49: \author{B. Kamys\inst{1} \and P. Kulessa\inst{2} \and H. Ohm\inst{2}
50: \and K. Pysz\inst{3} \and Z. Rudy\inst{1} \and H. Str\"oher\inst{2}
51: \and W. Cassing\inst{4}% etc
52: % \thanks is optional - remove next line if not needed
53: %\thanks{\emph{Present address:} Insert the address here if needed}%
54: } % Do not remove
55: %
56: %
57: %%%\offprints{} % Insert a name or remove this line
58: %
59: %
60: \institute{ M. Smoluchowski Institute of Physics,
61: Jagellonian University, PL-30059 Cracow, Poland \and
62: Institut f\"ur Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum J\"ulich,
63: D-52425 J\"ulich, Germany \and
64: H. Niewodnicza\'nski Institute of Nuclear Physics,
65: PL-31342 Cracow, Poland \and
66: %Gesellschaft f\"ur Schwerionenforschung,
67: %D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany \and
68: Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik, Justus Liebig Universit\"at Giessen,
69: D-35392 Giessen, Germany}
70: %
71: %
72: \date{Received: date / Revised version: date}
73: % The correct dates will be entered by Springer
74: %
75: %
76: \abstract{
77: The lifetime of the $\Lambda$-hyperon for the nonmesonic decay
78: %
79: $\Lambda$N $\rightarrow$ NN
80: %
81: has been determined by a measurement at COSY J\"ulich of the delayed fission
82: %
83: of heavy
84: %
85: hypernuclei produced in proton - Au collisions at T$_p$=1.9 GeV.
86: %
87: It is found that heavy hypernuclei
88: %
89: with mass numbers A$\approx$(180$\pm$5) and atomic numbers
90: %
91: Z$\approx$(74$\pm$2) fission with a lifetime
92: %
93: $\tau_{\Lambda}$=130 $\pm$ 13(stat.) $\pm$ 15(syst.) ps.
94: %
95: This value together with the results obtained for other heavy hypernuclei
96: %
97: in previous investigations indicates -- on the confidence level of 0.9 --
98: %
99: a violation of the phenomenological $\Delta$I=1/2 rule
100: %
101: for the $\Lambda$N $\rightarrow$ NN transitions as known from
102: %
103: the weak mesonic decays of kaons and hyperons.
104: %
105: \PACS{
106: {13.30.-a}{Decays of baryons} \and
107: {13.75.Ev}{Hyperon-nucleon interaction} \and
108: {21.80}{Hypernuclei} \and
109: {25.80.Pw}{Hyperon-induced reactions}
110: } % end of PACS codes
111: } %end of abstract
112: %
113: \maketitle
114: %
115: %
116: %
117: %%%\section{Introduction}
118: %%%\label{intro}
119:
120: The free $\Lambda$-hyperon undergoes almost with 100\% probability
121: %
122: the mesonic decay, i.e.
123: %
124: $\Lambda \rightarrow \pi^- + p$ or $\Lambda \rightarrow \pi^o + n$.
125: %
126: The energy release ($\approx$ 40 MeV) and its sharing among pion and
127: %
128: nucleon implies (due to momentum conservation)
129: %
130: that the energy of the nucleon is much
131: %
132: smaller than the Fermi energy of nucleons in the nucleus.
133: %
134: Therefore, such a process is strongly suppressed in nuclei and a different
135: %
136: type of the hyperon decay -- nonmesonic decay -- dominates
137: %
138: for all but the lightest hypernuclei. This decay can be induced by neutrons
139: %
140: (n+$\Lambda \rightarrow$ n+n) or by protons (p+$\Lambda \rightarrow$ p+n)
141: %
142: with an energy release much higher than in the mesonic decay
143: %
144: ($\approx$ 180 MeV). The higher nucleon energy, due to an equal sharing
145: %
146: of the energy among both nucleons, implies that
147: %
148: this process is not blocked by the Pauli principle.
149:
150: The nonmesonic $\Lambda$ - decay represents an example for the nonleptonic weak
151: %
152: interaction of baryons
153: %
154: with a change of strangeness ($\Delta$S = 1) and isospin
155: %
156: ($\Delta$I= 1/2 or 3/2). Thus it is an analogue of the weak nucleon - nucleon
157: %
158: interaction, but it involves a new degree of freedom, i.e. strangeness.
159: %
160: The strong and Coulomb interactions preserve strangeness
161: %
162: and therefore the weak interaction responsible for the nonmesonic decay
163: %
164: is not masked by contributions from
165: %
166: these two interactions. Therefore the nonmesonic decay enables
167: %
168: to study both parity violating
169: %
170: and parity conserving amplitudes in contrast to the
171: %
172: nucleon-nucleon
173: %
174: interaction, where the latter amplitudes are completely masked by strong
175: %
176: and Coulomb forces \cite{KIS87}.
177:
178: The standard model of electro-weak interactions favors neither
179: %
180: $\Delta$I= 1/2 transitions nor the $\Delta$I= 3/2 transitions, but
181: %
182: experimental investigations on the properties of mesonic decays
183: %
184: of kaons and hyperons lead to the obvious dominance of the $\Delta$I= 1/2
185: %
186: part (the so called $\Delta$I= 1/2 rule) \cite{DON86}.
187: %
188: The question arises whether this is also the case
189: %
190: for the nonmesonic decay of the $\Lambda$-hyperon.
191: %
192: Data from the nonmesonic decay of light hypernuclei,
193: %
194: which were used to test this hypothesis in the phenomenological
195: %
196: model proposed by Block and Dalitz \cite{BLO63}, are affected by too large errors
197: %
198: to solve this problem unambigously \cite{ALB00}. Another possibility
199: %
200: for testing the validity of the $\Delta$I= 1/2 rule is an investigation
201: %
202: of the dependence of the hyperon lifetime for the nonmesonic decay
203: %
204: on the mass of the hypernucleus in which the hyperon
205: %
206: is embedded \cite{RUD99}.
207: %
208: Such a test requires, besides the knowledge of the lifetimes of light
209: %
210: hypernuclei, also the precise knowledge of the lifetimes for heavy hypernuclei.
211: %
212: The existing experimental results on the lifetime of heavy hypernuclei,
213: %
214: which have been produced in
215: %
216: antiproton interactions with Bi and U nuclei \cite{ARM93}, agree within the
217: %
218: errors with the data obtained in proton induced reactions
219: %
220: on these targets \cite{OHM97,KUL98}. Experiments with electrons on Bi nuclei
221: %
222: \cite{NOG86,NOG87} lead to an order of magnitude longer lifetime, however,
223: %
224: one has to note that the detection conditions of these experiments
225: %
226: were not suitable for a measurement of such short lifetimes as quoted
227: %
228: in antiproton and proton experiments.
229:
230: In the present note new results on the lifetime measurements are
231: %
232: presented which were obtained at COSY J\"ulich in proton collisions with gold nuclei
233: %
234: at T$_{p}$ = 1.9 GeV.
235: %
236: The details of the experimental apparatus and the data analysis are
237: %
238: described elsewhere \cite{PYS99}. We briefly recall the physics of the
239: %
240: measurement and the detection principle.
241: %
242: %
243: %%%\section{Experiment}
244: %%%\label{expe}
245: %
246: %
247: %and \cite{RefJ}
248: %\subsection{Subsection title}
249: %\label{sec:2}
250: %as required. Don't forget to give each section
251: %and subsection a unique label (see Sect.~\ref{sec:1}).
252: %
253: %
254: %
255: % For one-column wide figures use
256: \begin{figure}
257: % Use the relevant command for your figure-insertion program
258: % to insert the figure file.
259: % For example, with the option graphics use
260: \resizebox{0.5\textwidth}{!}{%
261: \includegraphics{idea.eps}
262: }
263: % If not, use
264: %\vspace{5cm} % Give the correct figure height in cm
265: \caption{The schematic view of the apparatus and the idea of the measurement.}
266: \label{fig:1} % Give a unique label
267: \end{figure}
268: %
269: %
270: The interaction of the proton beam with an energy above the (p,K$^+$)
271: %
272: threshold with heavy target nuclei
273: %
274: causes prompt fission of target nuclei as well as the associated (K$^+ \Lambda$)
275: %
276: production and for some fraction of reactions the production
277: %
278: of hypernuclei. The hypernuclei will promptly
279: %
280: fission with large probability -- similarly to target nuclei -- or they can
281: %
282: survive the prompt fission. In the first case hypernuclei decay in the
283: %
284: target but the latter escape and
285: %
286: fission -- due to a rather long lifetime for the nonmesonic decay
287: %
288: of the hyperon ($\approx 200 ps$) --
289: %
290: at some distance downstream of the target.
291: %
292: Fragments from prompt fission of nuclei
293: %
294: and hypernuclei, which emerge from the target, can hit only that
295: %
296: part of the detector which is not
297: %
298: shielded by a diaphragm, denoted
299: %
300: as "PROMPT" in Fig. \ref{fig:1}.
301: %
302: The fragments from the delayed fission of hypernuclei
303: %
304: are able to reach also the remaining part of the detector,
305: %
306: not accessible by
307: %
308: the prompt fission fragments. Therefore the distribution of hits
309: %
310: of the delayed fission fragments in the shadow region of the detector
311: %
312: is separated from the distribution of the prompt fission fragments
313: %
314: by a sharp edge and contains information on the lifetime
315: %
316: of hyperons folded with the
317: %
318: velocity distribution of the hypernuclei
319: %
320: (technique known as "recoil shadow method").
321:
322: Such a method for the separation of delayed fission fragments
323: %
324: from the prompt fission \cite{MET74}
325: %
326: has been used in all experiments measuring the lifetime
327: %
328: of heavy hypernuclei \cite{ARM93,OHM97,KUL98,NOG86,NOG87,PYS99}.
329: %
330: Experiments with a thin target in an internal
331: %
332: proton beam have the advantage that the recoiling hypernuclei
333: %
334: escape with larger velocities compared to hypernuclei
335: %
336: produced by electrons or antiprotons
337: %
338: and therefore allow for the most accurate
339: %
340: determination of the lifetime. However, it was observed
341: %
342: in Ref. \cite{PYS99}
343: %
344: that the experiments in the internal beam are very sensitive to
345: %
346: mechanical properties
347: %
348: of the targets, which must be very thin. Especially the uranium target,
349: %
350: which is the most efficient
351: %
352: for production of hypernuclei, is rather unstable both,
353: %
354: in the form of UF$_4$ and UO$_2$. It changes its shape
355: %
356: during experiments causing rather large background
357: %
358: in the shadow region of the detector.
359: %
360: By contrast in the present note we report on the experiment
361: %
362: performed with a gold target, which is mechanically stable.
363: %
364: An additional advantage gives a favorable ratio
365: %
366: of the delayed fission events to the background appearing from
367: %
368: prompt fission. This is illustrated in Table \ref{tab:1} , where
369: %
370: all factors influencing the ratio of the delayed fission cross section
371: %
372: to prompt fission cross sections are listed for U, Bi, and Au.
373:
374: %
375: %% For two-column wide figures use
376: %%%\begin{figure*}
377: % Use the relevant command for your figure-insertion program
378: % to insert the figure file. See example above.
379: % If not, use
380: %%%\vspace*{5cm} % Give the correct figure height in cm
381: %%%\caption{Please write your figure caption here}
382: %%%\label{fig:2} % Give a unique label
383: %%%\end{figure*}
384: %
385: % For tables use
386: \begin{table}
387: \caption{Comparison of calculated hypernuclei production cross sections
388: in proton induced reactions at T$_p$=1.9 GeV for 3 heavy nuclei
389: %
390: ($\sigma_{HY}$/$\mu$b),
391: %
392: the survival probability of the produced ('hot') hypernuclei
393: %
394: against prompt fission ( P$_S$ ),
395: %
396: the probability of delayed fission of ('cold') hypernuclei
397: %
398: induced by hyperon decay ( P$_{f_{\Lambda}}$ ),
399: %
400: the cross section for the delayed fission
401: %
402: of hypernuclei ($\sigma_{del}$ / $\mu$b). Also given are
403: %
404: the cross sections for prompt fission
405: %
406: of the target nucleus ($\sigma_{prompt}$ / b)
407: %
408: for U, Bi, and Au \cite{HUD76}-\cite{VAI81} .}
409:
410: \label{tab:1} % Give a unique label
411: % For LaTeX tables use
412: \begin{tabular}{llllll}
413: \hline\noalign{\smallskip}
414: & \multicolumn{4}{c}{Theoretical values} & Exp. data \\
415: \hline\noalign{\smallskip}
416: Target & $\sigma_{HY}$/$\mu$b & P$_S$ & P$_{f_{\Lambda}}$ &
417: $\sigma_{del}$ / $\mu$b &
418: $\sigma_{prompt}$ / b \\
419: \noalign{\smallskip}\hline\noalign{\smallskip}
420: U & 410 & 0.12 & 0.85 & 42 & $\approx$1.5 \\
421: \noalign{\smallskip}\hline
422: Bi & 350 & 0.90 & 0.09 & 25 & $\approx$0.25 \\
423: \noalign{\smallskip}\hline
424: Au & 330 & 0.99 & 0.05 & 16 & $\approx$0.10 \\
425: \end{tabular}
426: % Or use
427: %%%\vspace*{5cm} % with the correct table height
428: \end{table}
429: %
430: %
431: The theoretical quantities presented in Table \ref{tab:1}
432: %
433: have been evaluated in the coupled
434: %
435: channel Boltzmann-Uehling-Uhlenbeck approach for the first,
436: %
437: fast stage of the reaction,
438: %
439: accompanied by the statistical model
440: %
441: for the second, slow stage of the reaction.
442: %
443: The last column contains experimental data taken from the literature
444: %
445: \cite{HUD76,BOC78,VAI81}.
446: %
447: As can be seen, the decay rate of the
448: %
449: delayed fission for Au targets is expected to be
450: %
451: $\approx$3 times smaller
452: %
453: than that for U targets.
454: %
455: However, the lower statistics for Au targets can be compensated to some
456: %
457: extent by a smaller background from the prompt fission fragments,
458: %
459: because the cross section for prompt fission of Au nuclei by protons
460: %
461: at 1.9 GeV energy is $\approx$16 times smaller than
462: %
463: for a U target.
464: %
465:
466: In the present experiment a 30 $\mu$g/cm$^2$ thick Au target on
467: %
468: 26 $\mu$g/cm$^2$ carbon backing was irradiated by the
469: %
470: internal proton beam of COSY
471: %
472: with 5 $\cdot$ 10$^{10}$ protons circulating in the ring.
473: %
474: The measurements were done
475: %
476: at 1.9 GeV -- to observe the decay of hypernuclei, and at 1.0 GeV
477: %
478: -- to determine the background
479: %
480: (the latter energy is low enough so that the production of hypernuclei
481: %
482: is negligible).
483: %
484: COSY has been operated
485: %
486: in the so called supercycle mode \cite{PYS99}, in which the machine was
487: %
488: switched between the
489: %
490: two energies every $\approx$ 18 s. Thus the
491: %
492: properties of the target were the same for both energies.
493: %
494: Other details of the experimental apparatus and the data analysis
495: %
496: were the same
497: %
498: as described in Ref. \cite{PYS99}.
499: %
500: %
501: % For one-column wide figures use
502: \begin{figure}
503: % Use the relevant command for your figure-insertion program
504: % to insert the figure file.
505: % For example, with the option graphics use
506: \resizebox{0.45\textwidth}{!}{%
507: \includegraphics{rys.eps}
508: }
509: % If not, use
510: %\vspace{5cm} % Give the correct figure height in cm
511: \caption{The position distribution of hits of fission fragments
512: %
513: in position sensitive detectors. Details of the figure are discussed
514: in the text below.}
515: \label{fig:2} % Give a unique label
516: \end{figure}
517: %
518: %
519: %
520:
521: The projections of the two dimensional position distributions
522: %
523: of the hits of delayed
524: %
525: and prompt fission fragments in the multiwire proportional chambers
526: %
527: along the beam direction are presented
528: %
529: in Fig. \ref{fig:2}. The dots with error bars represent
530: %
531: the distribution measured at the proton energy T$_p$=1.9 GeV after
532: %
533: subtraction of the distribution measured at T$_p$=1.0 GeV (normalized
534: %
535: to the maximum of distributions).
536: %
537: The latter distribution is
538: %
539: shown in Fig. \ref{fig:2} by the thin solid line.
540: %
541: The data presented as full dots were used to extract the lifetime
542: %
543: of the $\Lambda$ hyperon by a fit of the simulated distribution
544: %
545: of delayed fission fragments - the thick solid line.
546: %
547: The dashed line in Fig. \ref{fig:2} corresponds to the simulated
548: %
549: prompt fission fragment distribution
550: %
551: (which is the same for T$_p$=1.9 GeV,
552: %
553: and for 1.0 GeV).
554: %
555: %
556: The velocity distribution of hypernuclei -- necessary for the simulation
557: %
558: of the delayed fission fragment distributions --
559: %
560: has been evaluated
561: %
562: within the theoretical formalism mentioned above. The reliability of the
563: %
564: calculations has been checked by a comparison of the experimental
565: %
566: and theoretical momentum distributions of kaons produced together
567: %
568: with the $\Lambda$-hyperons (in the associated production) and by
569: %
570: a comparison of experimental and theoretical momentum distributions
571: %
572: of the fragments from the proton induced prompt fission of the U target
573: %
574: \cite{RUD98}.
575:
576: The lifetime extracted from the fit
577: %
578: to the experimental data is:
579: %
580: \begin{eqnarray*}
581: \tau_{\Lambda} & = & 130 \pm 13 (stat.) \pm 15 (syst.)\,\, ps.
582: \end{eqnarray*}
583: %
584: %
585: %
586: %%%\section{Conclusions}
587: This result agrees with the outcome of the experiment p+Bi
588: %
589: (161 $\pm$ 7 (stat.) $\pm$ 14 ps) \cite{KUL98},
590: %
591: but is not in agreement with
592: %
593: the published data for p+U reaction from Ref. \cite{OHM97}
594: %
595: (240 $\pm$ 60 ps). We point out, however,
596: %
597: that a later reanalysis of the uranium data \cite{ZYC99},
598: %
599: in which Poisson statistics
600: %
601: of events in position distributions was used instead
602: %
603: the Gaussian statistics, lead to a smaller value of the lifetime
604: %
605: (194 $\pm$ 55 ps). Thus, the present value for p+Au agrees
606: %
607: within the limits of errors with the reanalyzed p+U data.
608: %
609: This also holds true for antiproton
610: %
611: induced hypernuclei production on Bi (180 $\pm$ 40 (stat.) $\pm$ 60 ps)
612: %
613: and U targets (130 $\pm$ 30 (stat.) $\pm$ 30 ps) \cite{ARM93}.
614: %
615: All these published data are biased with large errors -- with
616: %
617: the exception of the p+Bi experiment. The present p+Au
618: %
619: experiment provides a new value for the lifetime of heavy hypernuclei,
620: %
621: measured with a similar accuracy as that in the p + Bi experiment.
622: %
623: %
624:
625: It is known \cite{RUD99}, that the shape of the mass dependence
626: %
627: of the lifetime of hypernuclei is sensitive
628: %
629: to the ratio R$_n$/R$_p$ of the neutron induced to proton induced $\Lambda$
630: %
631: nonmesonic decays,
632: %
633: which results from the isospin structure of
634: %
635: the decay amplitudes.
636: %
637: The absolute scale of the lifetimes is fixed by their values
638: %
639: for light hypernuclei, e.g. $^{11}$B, $^{12}$C, where lifetime is independent
640: %
641: of the R$_n$/R$_p$ ratio. Thus, a validity of the phenomenological $\Delta$I = 1/2 rule,
642: %
643: which implies that R$_n$/R$_p \le 2$, put constraints on the lifetimes of heavy
644: %
645: hypernuclei. According to this rule
646: %
647: the lifetime of heavy hypernuclei
648: %
649: should be larger than $\approx$ 180 ps for mass numbers A $\approx$ 180 .
650: %
651: The present experiment shows
652: %
653: that the lifetime of these heavy hypernuclei is significantly shorter.
654: %
655: Thus, it indicates (together with p+Bi data)
656: %
657: that the phenomenological rule
658: %
659: claiming that strange particles decay only with
660: %
661: the change of isospin equal 1/2 is violated in the nonmesonic
662: %
663: decay of $\Lambda$ hyperons. The confidence level for this statement has been
664: %
665: determined - following the procedure given in Ref.\cite{RUD99} - to be equal
666: %
667: $\approx$ 0.9.
668:
669:
670:
671:
672:
673:
674:
675:
676:
677:
678:
679:
680:
681:
682:
683: \vspace{0.8cm}
684: \textbf{Acknowledgements}\\
685:
686: The success of the experiment relied very much on the high quality of the
687: %
688: Au targets which were prepared by Dr B. Lommel and her target laboratory
689: %
690: at GSI Darmstadt, Germany.
691:
692: We are indebted to Prof. O.W.B. Schult for stimulating discussions and
693: %
694: interest in these investigations.
695:
696: The project has been supported by the DLR International Bureau of the BMBF,
697: %
698: Bonn, and the Polish Committee for Scientific Research (Grant No. 2P03B 16117).
699:
700:
701: % BibTeX users please use
702: % \bibliographystyle{}
703: % \bibliography{}
704: %
705: % Non-BibTeX users please use
706: \begin{thebibliography}{}
707: %
708: % and use \bibitem to create references.
709: %
710: %\bibitem{RefJ}
711: % Format for Journal Reference
712: %
713: %
714: \bibitem{KIS87} St. Kistryn, et al.,
715: %J. Lang, J. Liechti, R. Mueller, F. Nessi-Tedaldi, M. Simonius,
716: %J. Smyrski, S. Jaccard, W. Haeberli, J. Sromicki,
717: Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{58} (1987) 1616
718:
719: %
720: \bibitem{DON86} J.F. Donoghue, et al., % E. Golowich, and B. Holstein,
721: Phys. Rep. \textbf{131} (1986) 319
722: %
723: \bibitem{BLO63} M.M. Block and R.H. Dalitz,
724: Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{11} (1963) 96
725: %
726: \bibitem{ALB00} W.M. Alberico and G. Garbarino,
727: nucl-th/0001012
728: %
729: \bibitem{RUD99} Z. Rudy, et al.,
730: %W. Cassing, L. Jarczyk, B. Kamys, O.W.B. Schult, A. Strza{\l}kowski,
731: Eur. Phys. J. \textbf{A5} (1999) 127
732: %
733: \bibitem{ARM93} T.A. Armstrong, et al.,
734: %J.P. Bocquet, G. Ericsson, T. Johansson, T. Krogulski, R.A. Lewis,
735: %F. Malek, E. Monnand, J. Mougey, H. Nifenecker, J. Passaneau,
736: %P. Perrin, S.M. Polikanov, M. Rey-Campagnolle, C. Ristori,
737: %G.A. Smith, G. Tibell,
738: Phys. Rev. \textbf{C47} (1993) 1957
739: %
740: \bibitem{OHM97} H. Ohm, et al.,
741: % T. Hermes, W. Borgs, H.R. Koch, R. Maier, D. Prasuhn,
742: % H.J. Stein, O.W.B. Schult, K. Pysz, Z. Rudy, L. Jarczyk,
743: % B. Kamys, P. Kulessa, A. Strza{\l}kowski, W. Cassing, Y. Uozumi,
744: % I. Zychor,
745: Phys. Rev. \textbf{C55} (1997) 3062
746: %
747: \bibitem{KUL98} P. Kulessa, et al.,
748: %Z. Rudy, M. Hartmann, K. Pysz, B. Kamys, I. Zychor,
749: %H. Ohm, L. Jarczyk, A. Srza{\l}kowski, W.cassing, H. Hodde,
750: %W. Borgs, H.R. Koch, R. Maier, D. Prasuhn, M. Motoba, O.W.B. Schult,
751: Phys. Lett. \textbf{B427} (1998) 403
752: %
753: \bibitem{NOG86} V.I. Noga, et al.,
754: %Yu.N. Ranyuk, N. Ya. Rutkevich, et al.
755: %Yad. Fiz. \textbf{43} (1986) 1332
756: Sov. J. Nucl. Phys \textbf{43} (1986) 856
757: %
758: \bibitem{NOG87} V.I. Noga, et al.,
759: %Yu.N. Ranyuk, N. Ya. Rutkevich, et al.
760: %Yad. Fiz. \textbf{46} (1987) 1313
761: Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. \textbf{46} (1987) 769
762: %
763: \bibitem{PYS99} K. Pysz, et al.,
764: % I. Zychor, T. Hermes, M. Hartmann, H. Ohm, P. Kulessa,
765: %W. Borgs, H.R. Koch, R. Maier, D. Prasuhn, Z. Rudy, B. Kamys,
766: %W. Cassing, J. Pfeiffer, Y. Uozumi, L. Jarczyk, A. Strza{\l}kowski,
767: %O.W.B. Schult,
768: Nucl. Instr. \& Meth. \textbf{A420} (1999) 356
769: %
770: \bibitem{MET74} V. Metag, et al., Nucl. Instr. \& Meth. {\bf 114} (1974) 445
771: %
772: \bibitem{HUD76} J. Hudis and S. Katcoff, Phys. Rev. \textbf{C13} (1976) 1961
773: %prompt fission Au, Bi, U
774: %
775: \bibitem{BOC78} B.A. Bochagov, et al.,
776: %V.S. Bychenkov, V.D. Dmitriev, S.P. Mal'tsev, A.I. Obukhov,
777: %N.A. Perfilov, V.A. Udod, O.E. Shigaev,
778: Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. \textbf{28} (1978) 291
779: %prompt fission Au, Bi, U
780: %
781: \bibitem{VAI81} L.A. Vaishnene, et al.,
782: %L.N. Andronenko, G.G. Kovshevny, A.A. Kotov, G.E. Solyakin, W. Neubert,
783: Z. Phys. \textbf{A302} (1981) 143
784: %
785: \bibitem{RUD98} Z. Rudy, %habilitation thesis,
786: Report INP No 1811/PH,
787: Cracow 1998
788: %
789: %
790: \bibitem{ZYC99} I. Zychor, et al., Int. Symp. on Nuclear Electro-Weak
791: %
792: Spectroscopy for Symmetries and Electro-Weak Nuclear processes (NEWS99),
793: Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
794: %
795: % Format for books
796: %\bibitem{RefB}
797: %Author, \textit{Book title} (Publisher, place year) page numbers
798: % etc
799: \end{thebibliography}
800:
801:
802: \end{document}
803:
804: % end of file template.tex
805:
806: