1: %International Journal of Modern Physics A in LaTex

2: %--- updated in 29/9/93

3: 

4: \documentstyle[twoside,epsfig]{article}

5: 

6: %--------------------NEW ADDITIONS TO EXISTING ARTICLE.STY---------------------

7: \catcode`\@=11

8: \long\def\@makefntext#1{

9: \protect\noindent \hbox to 3.2pt {\hskip-.9pt

10: $^{{\eightrm\@thefnmark}}$\hfil}#1\hfill}       %CAN BE USED

11: 

12: \def\thefootnote{\fnsymbol{footnote}}

13: \def\@makefnmark{\hbox to 0pt{$^{\@thefnmark}$\hss}}    %ORIGINAL

14: 

15: \def\ps@myheadings{\let\@mkboth\@gobbletwo

16: \def\@oddhead{\hbox{}

17: \rightmark\hfil\eightrm\thepage}

18: \def\@oddfoot{}\def\@evenhead{\eightrm\thepage\hfil

19: \leftmark\hbox{}}\def\@evenfoot{}

20: \def\sectionmark##1{}\def\subsectionmark##1{}}

21: 

22: %--------------------START OF IJMPA1.STY---------------------------------------

23: %THIS STYLE FILE (IJMPA1.STY) IS FOR REFERENCES FROM 1--9 ITEMS ONLY

24: 

25: %THIS STYLE FILE WILL PRODUCE

26: %$^1$ IN BODY TEXT AND 1. AT REFERENCE SECTION

27: 

28: \oddsidemargin=\evensidemargin

29: \addtolength{\oddsidemargin}{-30pt}

30: \addtolength{\evensidemargin}{-30pt}

31: 

32: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

33: \newcommand{\symbolfootnote}{\renewcommand{\thefootnote}

34:     {\fnsymbol{footnote}}}

35: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}

36: \newcommand{\alphfootnote}

37:     {\setcounter{footnote}{0}

38:      \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\sevenrm\alph{footnote}}}

39: 

40: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

41: %NEWLY-DEFINED SECTION COMMANDS

42: \newcounter{sectionc}\newcounter{subsectionc}\newcounter{subsubsectionc}

43: \renewcommand{\section}[1] {\vspace{12pt}\addtocounter{sectionc}{1}

44: \setcounter{subsectionc}{0}\setcounter{subsubsectionc}{0}\noindent

45:     {\tenbf\thesectionc. #1}\par\vspace{5pt}}

46: \renewcommand{\subsection}[1] {\vspace{12pt}\addtocounter{subsectionc}{1}

47:     \setcounter{subsubsectionc}{0}\noindent

48:     {\bf\thesectionc.\thesubsectionc. {\kern1pt \bfit #1}}\par\vspace{5pt}}

49: \renewcommand{\subsubsection}[1] {\vspace{12pt}\addtocounter{subsubsectionc}{1}

50:     \noindent{\tenrm\thesectionc.\thesubsectionc.\thesubsubsectionc.

51:     {\kern1pt \tenit #1}}\par\vspace{5pt}}

52: \newcommand{\nonumsection}[1] {\vspace{12pt}\noindent{\tenbf #1}

53:     \par\vspace{5pt}}

54: 

55: %NEW MACRO TO HANDLE APPENDICES

56: \newcounter{appendixc}

57: \newcounter{subappendixc}[appendixc]

58: \newcounter{subsubappendixc}[subappendixc]

59: \renewcommand{\thesubappendixc}{\Alph{appendixc}.\arabic{subappendixc}}

60: \renewcommand{\thesubsubappendixc}

61:     {\Alph{appendixc}.\arabic{subappendixc}.\arabic{subsubappendixc}}

62: 

63: \renewcommand{\appendix}[1] {\vspace{12pt}

64:         \refstepcounter{appendixc}

65:         \setcounter{figure}{0}

66:         \setcounter{table}{0}

67:         \setcounter{lemma}{0}

68:         \setcounter{theorem}{0}

69:         \setcounter{corollary}{0}

70:         \setcounter{definition}{0}

71:         \setcounter{equation}{0}

72:         \renewcommand{\thefigure}{\Alph{appendixc}.\arabic{figure}}

73:         \renewcommand{\thetable}{\Alph{appendixc}.\arabic{table}}

74:         \renewcommand{\theappendixc}{\Alph{appendixc}}

75:         \renewcommand{\thelemma}{\Alph{appendixc}.\arabic{lemma}}

76:         \renewcommand{\thetheorem}{\Alph{appendixc}.\arabic{theorem}}

77:         \renewcommand{\thedefinition}{\Alph{appendixc}.\arabic{definition}}

78:         \renewcommand{\thecorollary}{\Alph{appendixc}.\arabic{corollary}}

79:         \renewcommand{\theequation}{\Alph{appendixc}.\arabic{equation}}

80: %   \noindent{\tenbf Appendix \theappendixc. #1}\par\vspace{5pt}}

81:         \noindent{\tenbf Appendix \theappendixc #1}\par\vspace{5pt}}

82: \newcommand{\subappendix}[1] {\vspace{12pt}

83:         \refstepcounter{subappendixc}

84:         \noindent{\bf Appendix \thesubappendixc. {\kern1pt \bfit #1}}

85:     \par\vspace{5pt}}

86: \newcommand{\subsubappendix}[1] {\vspace{12pt}

87:         \refstepcounter{subsubappendixc}

88:         \noindent{\rm Appendix \thesubsubappendixc. {\kern1pt \tenit #1}}

89:     \par\vspace{5pt}}

90: 

91: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

92: %FOLLOWING THREE COMMANDS ARE FOR `LIST' COMMAND.

93: \topsep=0in\parsep=0in\itemsep=0in

94: \parindent=15pt

95: 

96: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

97: \newcommand{\textlineskip}{\baselineskip=13pt}

98: \newcommand{\smalllineskip}{\baselineskip=10pt}

99: 

100: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

101: %MACRO FOR COPYRIGHT BLOCK

102: \def\eightcirc{

103: \begin{picture}(0,0)

104: \put(4.4,1.8){\circle{6.5}}

105: \end{picture}}

106: \def\eightcopyright{\eightcirc\kern2.7pt\hbox{\eightrm c}}

107: 

108: \newcommand{\copyrightheading}[1]

109:     {\vspace*{-2.5cm}\smalllineskip{\flushleft

110:     {\footnotesize International Journal of Modern Physics A, #1}\\

111:     {\footnotesize $\eightcopyright$\, World Scientific Publishing

112:      Company}\\

113:      }}

114: 

115: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

116: %MACRO FOR PUBLISHER INFORMATION SECTION

117: \newcommand{\pub}[1]{{\begin{center}\footnotesize\smalllineskip

118:     Received #1\\

119:     \end{center}

120:     }}

121: 

122: \newcommand{\publisher}[2]{{\begin{center}\footnotesize\smalllineskip

123:     Received #1\\

124:     Revised #2

125:     \end{center}

126:     }}

127: 

128: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

129: %MARCO FOR ABSTRACT BLOCK

130: \def\abstracts#1#2#3{{

131:     \centering{\begin{minipage}{4.5in}\baselineskip=10pt\footnotesize

132:     \parindent=0pt #1\par

133:     \parindent=15pt #2\par

134:     \parindent=15pt #3

135:     \end{minipage}}\par}}

136: 

137: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

138: %MARCO FOR KEYWORDS BLOCK

139: \def\keywords#1{{

140:     \centering{\begin{minipage}{4.5in}\baselineskip=10pt\footnotesize

141:     {\footnotesize\it Keywords}\/: #1

142:      \end{minipage}}\par}}

143: 

144: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

145: %NEW MACRO FOR BIBLIOGRAPHY

146: \newcommand{\bibit}{\nineit}

147: \newcommand{\bibbf}{\ninebf}

148: \renewenvironment{thebibliography}[1]

149:     {\frenchspacing

150:      \ninerm\baselineskip=11pt

151:      \begin{list}{\arabic{enumi}.}

152:     {\usecounter{enumi}\setlength{\parsep}{0pt}

153:      \setlength{\leftmargin 12.7pt}{\rightmargin 0pt} %FOR 1--9 ITEMS

154: %    \setlength{\leftmargin 17pt}{\rightmargin 0pt}   %FOR 10--99 ITEMS

155: %    \setlength{\leftmargin 22pt}{\rightmargin 0pt}   %FOR 100+ABOVE ITEMS

156:      \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt} \settowidth

157:     {\labelwidth}{#1.}\sloppy}}{\end{list}}

158: 

159: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

160: %LIST ENVIRONMENTS

161: \newcounter{itemlistc}

162: \newcounter{romanlistc}

163: \newcounter{alphlistc}

164: \newcounter{arabiclistc}

165: \newenvironment{itemlist}

166:         {\setcounter{itemlistc}{0}

167:      \begin{list}{$\bullet$}

168:     {\usecounter{itemlistc}

169:      \setlength{\parsep}{0pt}

170:      \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}}}{\end{list}}

171: 

172: \newenvironment{romanlist}

173:     {\setcounter{romanlistc}{0}

174:      \begin{list}{$($\roman{romanlistc}$)$}

175:     {\usecounter{romanlistc}

176:      \setlength{\parsep}{0pt}

177:      \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}}}{\end{list}}

178: 

179: \newenvironment{alphlist}

180:     {\setcounter{alphlistc}{0}

181:      \begin{list}{$($\alph{alphlistc}$)$}

182:     {\usecounter{alphlistc}

183:      \setlength{\parsep}{0pt}

184:      \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}}}{\end{list}}

185: 

186: \newenvironment{arabiclist}

187:     {\setcounter{arabiclistc}{0}

188:      \begin{list}{\arabic{arabiclistc}}

189:     {\usecounter{arabiclistc}

190:      \setlength{\parsep}{0pt}

191:      \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}}}{\end{list}}

192: 

193: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

194: %FIGURE CAPTION

195: \newcommand{\fcaption}[1]{

196:         \refstepcounter{figure}

197:         \setbox\@tempboxa = \hbox{\footnotesize Fig.~\thefigure. #1}

198:         \ifdim \wd\@tempboxa > 5in

199:            {\begin{center}

200:         \parbox{5in}{\footnotesize\smalllineskip Fig.~\thefigure. #1}

201:             \end{center}}

202:         \else

203:              {\begin{center}

204:              {\footnotesize Fig.~\thefigure. #1}

205:               \end{center}}

206:         \fi}

207: 

208: %TABLE CAPTION

209: \newcommand{\tcaption}[1]{

210:         \refstepcounter{table}

211:         \setbox\@tempboxa = \hbox{\footnotesize Table~\thetable. #1}

212:         \ifdim \wd\@tempboxa > 5in

213:            {\begin{center}

214:         \parbox{5in}{\footnotesize\smalllineskip Table~\thetable. #1}

215:             \end{center}}

216:         \else

217:              {\begin{center}

218:              {\footnotesize Table~\thetable. #1}

219:               \end{center}}

220:         \fi}

221: 

222: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

223: %MACROS FOR SETTING \cite{x} OR \citeup{x}

224: \def\@citex[#1]#2{\if@filesw\immediate\write\@auxout

225:     {\string\citation{#2}}\fi

226: \def\@citea{}\@cite{\@for\@citeb:=#2\do

227:     {\@citea\def\@citea{,}\@ifundefined

228:     {b@\@citeb}{{\bf ?}\@warning

229:     {Citation `\@citeb' on page \thepage \space undefined}}

230:     {\csname b@\@citeb\endcsname}}}{#1}}

231: 

232: \newif\if@cghi

233: \def\cite{\@cghitrue\@ifnextchar [{\@tempswatrue

234:     \@citex}{\@tempswafalse\@citex[]}}

235: \def\citelow{\@cghifalse\@ifnextchar [{\@tempswatrue

236:     \@citex}{\@tempswafalse\@citex[]}}

237: \def\@cite#1#2{{$\null^{#1}$\if@tempswa\typeout

238:     {IJCGA warning: optional citation argument

239:     ignored: `#2'} \fi}}

240: \newcommand{\citeup}{\cite}

241: 

242: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

243: %FOR SUB/SUPERSCRIPT BOLDFACED + ITALICS

244: \def\pmb#1{\setbox0=\hbox{#1}

245:     \kern-.025em\copy0\kern-\wd0

246:     \kern.05em\copy0\kern-\wd0

247:     \kern-.025em\raise.0433em\box0}

248: \def\mbi#1{{\pmb{\mbox{\scriptsize ${#1}$}}}}

249: \def\mbr#1{{\pmb{\mbox{\scriptsize{#1}}}}}

250: 

251: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

252: %FOR FNSYMBOL FOOTNOTE AND ALPH{FOOTNOTE}

253: \def\fnm#1{$^{\mbox{\scriptsize #1}}$}

254: \def\fnt#1#2{\footnotetext{\kern-.3em

255:     {$^{\mbox{\scriptsize #1}}$}{#2}}}

256: 

257: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

258: %FOR CREATING THE OPENING PAGE NUMBER

259: \def\fpage#1{\begingroup

260: \voffset=.3in

261: \thispagestyle{empty}\begin{table}[b]\centerline{\footnotesize #1}

262:     \end{table}\endgroup}

263: 

264: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

265: %MACRO FOR RUNNINGHEAD

266: \def\runninghead#1#2{\pagestyle{myheadings}

267: \markboth{{\protect\footnotesize\it{\quad #1}}\hfill}

268: {\hfill{\protect\footnotesize\it{#2\quad}}}}

269: \headsep=15pt

270: 

271: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

272: \font\tenrm=cmr10

273: \font\tenit=cmti10

274: \font\tenbf=cmbx10

275: \font\bfit=cmbxti10 at 10pt

276: \font\ninerm=cmr9

277: \font\nineit=cmti9

278: \font\ninebf=cmbx9

279: \font\eightrm=cmr8

280: \font\eightit=cmti8

281: \font\eightbf=cmbx8

282: \font\sevenrm=cmr7

283: \font\fiverm=cmr5

284: 

285: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

286: \newtheorem{theorem}{\indent Theorem}

287: %OR \newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[sectionc] WHICH HAS SECTION NUMBER

288: 

289: \newtheorem{lemma}{Lemma}

290: %OR USE \newtheorem{lemma}{Lemma}[sectionc]

291: 

292: \newtheorem{definition}{Definition}

293: \newtheorem{corollary}{Corollary}

294: %USERS CAN ADD ON THEIR OWN NEW THEOREM-LIKE ENVIRONMENTS.

295: 

296: \newcommand{\proof}[1]{{\tenbf Proof.} #1 $\Box$.}

297: 

298: %--------------------END OF IJMPA1.STY-----------------------------------------

299: 

300: 

301: 

302: %--------------------START OF DATA FILE----------------------------------------

303: \textwidth=5truein

304: \textheight=7.8truein

305: 

306: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

307: %DEFINITIONS

308: \def\qed{\hbox{${\vcenter{\vbox{            %HOLLOW SQUARE

309:    \hrule height 0.4pt\hbox{\vrule width 0.4pt height 6pt

310:    \kern5pt\vrule width 0.4pt}\hrule height 0.4pt}}}$}}

311: 

312: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}    %USE SYMBOLIC FOOTNOTE

313: \newcommand{\rstev}{\mbox{$\rs = \T{1.8}$}}

314: \newcommand{\rssps}{\mbox{$\rs = \T{0.63}$}}

315: \newcommand{\XX}{\mbox{$\, \times \,$}}

316: \newcommand{\AP}{\mbox{${\rm \bar{p}}$}}

317: \newcommand{\SU}{\mbox{$<\! |S|^2 \!>$}}

318: \newcommand{\ET}{\mbox{$E_{T}$} }

319: \newcommand{\PT}{\mbox{$p_{T}$}}

320: \newcommand{\DP}{\mbox{$\Delta\phi$}}

321: \newcommand{\DR}{\mbox{$\Delta R$}}

322: \newcommand{\DE}{\mbox{$\Delta\eta$}}

323: \newcommand{\DEP}{\mbox{$\Delta\eta_{c}$}}

324: \newcommand{\PH}{\mbox{$\phi$}}

325: \newcommand{\EA}{\mbox{$\eta$} }

326: \newcommand{\EAJ}{\mbox{\EA(jet)}}

327: \newcommand{\AEA}{\mbox{$|\eta|$}}

328: \newcommand{\Ge}[1]{\mbox{#1 GeV}}

329: \newcommand{\T}[1]{\mbox{#1 TeV}}

330: \newcommand{\D}[1]{\mbox{$#1^{\circ}$}}

331: \newcommand{\x}{\cdot}

332: \newcommand{\ra}{\rightarrow}

333: \newcommand{\mb}{\mbox{mb}}

334: \newcommand{\nb}{\mbox{nb}}

335: \newcommand{\ipb}{\mbox{$pb^{-1}$}}

336: \newcommand{\inb}{\mbox{$nb^{-1}$}}

337: \newcommand{\rs}{\mbox{$\sqrt{\rm s}$}}

338: \newcommand{\fdel}{\mbox{$f(\DEP)$}}

339: \newcommand{\fdele}{\mbox{$f(\DEP)^{exp}$}}

340: \newcommand{\fgap}{\mbox{$f(\DEP\! \geq \!3)$}}

341: \newcommand{\fgape}{\mbox{$f(\DEP\! \geq \!3)^{exp}$}}

342: \newcommand{\fpyt}{\mbox{$f(\DEP\!>\!2)$}}

343: \newcommand{\delth}{\mbox{$\DEP\! \geq \!3$}}

344: \newcommand{\uplim}{\mbox{$1.1\!\times\!10^{-2}$}}

345: \def\simge{\mathrel{\rlap{\raise 0.53ex \hbox{$>$}}{\lower 0.53ex \hbox{$\sim$}}}}

346: \def\simle{\mathrel{\rlap{\raise 0.53ex \hbox{$<$}}{\lower 0.53ex \hbox{$\sim$}}}}

347: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

348: \begin{document}

349: 

350: \runninghead{A QCD Survey: $0 \leq Q^2 \leq 10^5 $ GeV$^2$} {A QCD

351: Survey: $0 \leq Q^2 \leq 10^5 $ GeV$^2$}

352: 

353: \normalsize\textlineskip

354: \thispagestyle{empty}

355: \setcounter{page}{1}

356: 

357: \copyrightheading{}         %{Vol. 0, No. 0 (1993) 000--000}

358: 

359: \vspace*{0.88truein}

360: 

361: \fpage{1} \centerline{\bf A QCD Survey: $0 \leq Q^2 \leq 10^5 $ GeV$^2$}

362: \vspace*{0.37truein}

363: \centerline{\footnotesize Gerald C. Blazey}

364: \vspace*{0.015truein}

365: \centerline{\footnotesize\it Physics Department, Northern Illinois

366: University } \baselineskip=10pt \centerline{\footnotesize\it

367: DeKalb, Illinois 60115-2854, U.S.A}

368: %\vspace*{0.225truein}

369: %\publisher{(received date)}{(revised date)}

370: \setcounter{footnote}{0}

371: 

372: \vspace*{0.21truein} \abstracts{Selected, recent results,

373: primarily from collider experiments but including some fixed

374: target experiments, are presented as a survey of Quantum

375: Chromodynamics (QCD).  The concepts of leading order and

376: next-to-leading order QCD are introduced. Inclusive $p\bar{p}$ jet

377: and dijet production and deep inelastic $ep$ scattering at very

378: large momentum transfer are shown to be in good agreement with

379: perturbative QCD (pQCD). Dijet, three-jet and multi-jet results

380: from $p\bar{p}, ep$, and $ee$ colliders at moderate $Q^2$ are also

381: compared to pQCD.  BFKL searches from all three colliders are

382: discussed. Recent measurements of structure functions and

383: contributions to the parton distribution functions are presented.

384: New measurements of $\alpha_s$ are summarized, the world average

385: is $\alpha_s = 0.1184 \pm 0.0031$.}{}{}

386: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\alph{footnote}}

387: 

388: \vspace*{1pt}\textlineskip  %) USE THIS MEASUREMENT WHEN THERE IS

389: \section{Introduction and a Brief Introduction to QCD}    %) A SECTION HEADING

390: \vspace*{-0.5pt}

391: 

392: \noindent Quantum chromodynamics (QCD) beautifully describes the

393: strong interaction over a surprisingly broad range of phenomena -

394: from the non-perturbative regime of hadronic structure to the

395: highest energies observed in particle colliders. Recent

396: measurements of high momentum transfer jet production and deep

397: inelastic scattering, multi-jet production, proton parton

398: distribution functions, and the strong coupling constant

399: convincingly illustrate the breath of experimental progress. These

400: results have, in turn, stimulated impressive theoretical progress

401: and sensitive searches for new interactions and dynamics.  Because

402: of the immense quantity of QCD research underway the results

403: discussed here are necessarily and unfortunately incomplete, this

404: document might best be viewed as an introductory overview.

405: 

406: The proton--antiproton interaction, a general scattering process,

407: nicely introduces the concepts of leading order and

408: next--to-leading order perturbative quantum chromodynamics.

409: Inelastic scattering between a proton and an antiproton can be

410: described as an elastic collision between a single proton

411: constituent and single antiproton constituent. These constituents

412: are collectively referred to as partons and in QCD are quarks and

413: gluons. Predictions for jet production are given by folding

414: experimentally determined parton distribution functions $f$ with

415: quark and gluon two--body scattering cross sections

416: $\hat{\sigma}$. The two ingredients can be formally combined to

417: calculate any cross section of interest: $\sigma = \sum_{i,j} \int

418: dx_{1}dx_{2}

419: f_{i}(x_{1},\mu^{2}_{F})f_{j}(x_{2},\mu^{2}_{F})\newline \sigma [

420: x_{1}P, x_{2}P, \alpha_{s}(\mu^{2}_{R}),

421: Q^{2}/\mu^{2}_{F},Q^{2}/\mu^{2}_{R}]$. The nonperturbative parton

422: distribution function $f_{k}(x_{l},\mu^{2}_{F})$ describes the

423: momentum fraction $x$ of the beam momentum $P$ carried by the

424: $l^{th}$ parton of type $k$. The hard two--body interaction

425: between the gluon and quark partons can be calculated with

426: perturbative QCD (pQCD) and is a function of the perturbative or

427: strong coupling constant $\alpha_{s}$, the hard scale momentum

428: transfer between incoming particles $Q$, and the renormalization

429: scale $\mu_{R}$.

430: 

431: The factorized scattering has been illustrated with a leading

432: order (LO) process; that is, a process with the minimum number of

433: vertices (or coupling constants) to describe two final states.

434: Although useful, the leading order picture (where one parton

435: results in one jet) is too simple and has an unphysical dependence

436: on $\mu_{R}$. Next--to--leading order (NLO), or for this two jet

437: process O$(\alpha^{3}_{s})$ calculations, include additional

438: parton emission and have reduced sensitivity to $\mu_{R}$.

439: Depending on the proximity of the outgoing partons, a ``jet''

440: could result from one or the combination of two partons. NLO

441: calculations crudely model fragmentation, thereby obviating the

442: need for fragmentation functions.

443: 

444: 

445: \section{QCD at the Highest Momentum Transfers}

446: 

447: \begin{figure}[b!] %figure 1

448: \vspace{-1.0in}

449: \centerline{\epsfig{file=D0inclin.ps,height=4.0in,width=4.75in}}

450: \vspace{-0.85in}

451:  \caption{The difference between the inclusive

452: cross section and NLO theory normalized to NLO theory.}

453: \label{D0JETSLIN}

454: \end{figure}

455: 

456: \noindent A complete theoretical description of inclusive jet

457: production, $p\bar{p} \rightarrow j+X$, requires proper treatment

458: of the final state radiation and accurate measurements of the

459: parton distribution functions, pdf's. The inclusive jet cross

460: section is reported as $d^{2}\eta/dE_{T}d\eta$. $\ET = Esin\theta$

461: where $E$ is jet energy and $\theta$ the angle between the proton

462: direction and the jet. The pseudorapidity, $\eta$, is defined as

463: $-ln(tan(\theta/2))$. Kinematically, an individual jet is

464: characterized by \ET, $\eta$, and azimuth $\phi$. Jets are found

465: by clustering energy in a cone of radius 0.7 in $\eta-\phi$

466: space~\cite{JETALGS}.

467: 

468: The inclusive jet cross section has been intensively studied at

469: beam energies of 900 GeV/c at the Fermilab Tevatron

470: proton--antiproton collider in Batavia, Illinois by the

471: D\O~collaboration for $\AEA < 3.0$~\cite{D0JETS2000,D0JETS1995}

472: and by the CDF collaboration in the region $0.1 < \AEA <

473: 0.7$~\cite{D0JETS2000,CDFPRL}. The data now span nearly ten orders

474: of magnitude for jet energies between 20 and 450 GeV. The

475: percentage difference as a function of \ET between the data and

476: theory normalized to the theory for the D\O~data is shown in

477: Fig.~\ref{D0JETSLIN}. Events at the highest \ET correspond to $x$

478: values of 0.5 and $Q^2$ greater than $10^5$ GeV$^2$. Data points

479: include statistical errors only and the bands indicate the

480: magnitude of the systematic errors. The figure includes a NLO

481: prediction~\cite{GGKEKS} using the CTEQ4HJ pdf. There is excellent

482: agreement at all \ET and \EA and, in particular, no indication of

483: excess production at large \ET. The CDF collaboration finds

484: similar agreement in the region $0.1 < \AEA < 0.7$, but reports a

485: 25\% discrepancy~\cite{D0JETS2000} for \ET above 400 GeV.

486: 

487: The good agreement is in sharp contrast to an earlier, lower

488: statistics results from the CDF collaboration which suggested

489: excess production at large \ET relative to contemporaneous NLO

490: predictions~\cite{CDFPRL}. The early CDF results prompted a closer

491: look at theoretical and pdf uncertainties contributing to the

492: predictions. In fact, inspired by the initial CDF result, the

493: CTEQ4HJ pdf used in Fig.~\ref{D0JETSLIN} includes a strengthened

494: high-x gluon component. All D\O~and CDF results are consistent

495: within statistical and systematic errors~\cite{ANNREV}.

496: 

497: \begin{figure}[b!] %figure 2

498: \vspace{-.2in}

499: \centerline{\epsfig{file=dijet_prl_web_fig_4.eps,height=2.0in,width=4.75in}}

500: \caption{Comparisons of central to forward dijet cross section

501: ratios as a function of mass to theoretical predictions. See text

502: for details.} \label{D0DIJETLIN}

503: \end{figure}

504: 

505: The dijet mass distribution for the leading two jets of a

506: $p\bar{p} \rightarrow j+j+X$ event at beam energies of 900 GeV

507: also constitutes a sensitive search for new physics. The cross

508: section is reported as $d^{3}\eta/dM_{jj}d\eta_{1}d\eta_{2}$ where

509: $M_{jj}$ is the invariant mass of the leading two jets. Both

510: D\O~and CDF have published results which show good agreement

511: between data and NLO QCD~\cite{D0ANG95,D0DIJETMASS,CDFDIJETMASS}.

512: As shown in Fig.~\ref{D0DIJETLIN}, the D0 collaboration has taken

513: the ratio of the central dijet mass distribution $\AEA \leq 0.5$

514: to the forward distribution, $0.5 \leq \AEA \leq 1.0$.  This

515: distribution is sensitive to quark compositeness because the

516: associated jet production will be predominantly central in

517: rapidity.  In a manner completely analogous to Rutherford

518: scattering, excess jet production at very large transverse

519: energies signals the presence of quark compositeness. The curves

520: in Fig.~\ref{D0DIJETLIN} include NLO predictions with and without

521: a additional jet production due to compositeness.  The solid curve

522: postulates no substructure, and D0 has set a limit of 2.4 TeV or

523: $\sim 10^{-19}$ m on any substructure~\cite{D0DIJETMASS}.

524: 

525: HERA, an electron-proton collider in Hamburg, Germany provides a

526: complementary and comprehensive opportunity to examine QCD over a

527: very large range of momentum transfer (0 to $3\times 10^{4}$

528: GeV${^2}$). The introductory description of $p\bar{p}$ jet

529: production can be modified to $ep$ scattering if one incoming

530: hadron is replaced with an electron and the exchanged gluon by an

531: electroweak boson . A neutral current (NC) reaction is

532: characterized by an exchanged photon or $Z$, while charged current

533: (CC) reactions involve an exchanged $W$. The CC and NC cross

534: sections are reported as $d^{2}\sigma/dQ^{2}$. HERA ran from

535: 1994--1997 with positrons at a center-of-mass energy of 300 GeV

536: and from 1997-1998 with electrons at an energy of 320 GeV.

537: 

538: As shown in Fig.~\ref{H1LOG}, the $ep \rightarrow e+X$ neutral

539: current cross section spans eight orders of

540: magnitude~\cite{H1NEW}. Below $Q^2 = 10^{4}~$GeV$^2$ the data are

541: well described by NLO theory. However, the NC $e^{+}p$ data shows

542: excess production at very high $Q^2$, an effect observed (and

543: which generated great excitement) by both the H1 and ZEUS

544: collaborations in the 1994--1997 data set~\cite{ZEUSHIGH,H1HIGH} .

545: In contrast, the 1997--1998 $e^{-}p$ NC cross section (also shown

546: in Fig.~\ref{H1LOG}) and similar results from the ZEUS

547: collaboration~\cite{ZEUSNEW} are both well described within

548: statistical errors at all $Q^2$ by NLO QCD. Although not shown, CC

549: $ep \rightarrow \nu +X$ cross sections for both electrons and

550: positrons are also well described by QCD~\cite{H1NEW,ZEUSNEW}.

551: 

552: The $p\bar{p}$ and $ep$ colliders both test the limits of QCD and

553: the Standard Model (SM) at the highest momentum transfer.  In the

554: mid-nineties hints of excess jet and NC events at large \ET or,

555: equivalently, $Q^2$ were observed at both colliders.  However,

556: since then new results (characterized by higher statistics or new

557: projectiles) and modified theoretical predictions (characterized

558: by new pdfs), strongly suggest the SM can currently describe the

559: data. The lure of new physics is exciting and searches for high

560: $Q^2$ discrepancies will continue, especially with the ever

561: increasing statistics at HERA and Fermilab. However, as seen in

562: the next section, the lower $Q^2$ regime of multi-jet production

563: proves an interesting window onto the behaviour of QCD.

564: 

565: 

566: \section{Multijet Production}

567: 

568: \noindent  All three colliders, HERA, the Tevatron, and the LEP

569: $e^{+}e^{-}$ machine in Geneva, Switzerland prove prolific

570: laboratories for the study of multi-jet production.  At HERA and

571: LEP jets are conventionally found with recombination algorithms

572: which cluster energy according to their proximity in \ET, \EA, and

573: azimuth~\cite{JETALGS}.  At LO, HERA dijet production occurs

574: through the QCD Compton graph (where a photon from the incoming

575: lepton scatters off a quark from the hadron to produce a gluon jet

576: and quark jet) and through the boson-gluon fusion graph (where a

577: gluon from the hadron splits into a $q\bar{q}$ pair, one of which

578: scatters off a photon from the incoming lepton, to produce a quark

579: and antiquark jet). The $\sim100 < Q^2 < \sim10^4$ GeV, rapidity,

580: mass, and $x$ distributions of these dijet cross sections are

581: generally well described by NLO QCD~\cite{HERADIJET}.

582: 

583: \begin{figure}[b!] %figure 3

584: \vspace{-.375in}

585: \centerline{\epsfig{file=dsigdq2nc.hqn.both.eps,height=2.5in,width=4.75in}}

586: \vspace{-.125in} \caption{Neutral current cross sections for

587: $e^{+}p$ and $e^{-}p$ scattering compared to Standard Model

588: expectations.} \label{H1LOG}

589: \end{figure}

590: \begin{figure}[b!] %figure 4

591: \vspace{-0.25in}

592: \centerline{\epsfig{file=300lego.eps,height=2.0in,width=4.75in}}

593: \vspace{-.125in}

594:  \caption{A Dalitz plot of a NLO three jet cross

595: section.} \label{THREEJET}

596: \end{figure}

597: 

598: The NLO dijet predictions, which include up to three emitted

599: partons, represent LO predictions for three jet production. These

600: LO, three jet predictions are in reasonable agreement with HERA

601: three jet cross sections as a function of $Q^2$ and

602: $M_{3jet}$~\cite{HERATRIJET}. There does seem to be a discrepancy

603: between data and theory for the ratio of three to two jet cross

604: sections. At $Q^2$ below 1000 GeV$^2$ the experimental ratio is

605: below the LO prediction~\cite{HERATRIJET} . However, parton shower

606: simulations show excellent agreement with the data, this is

607: typically a signal that higher order perturbative QCD predictions

608: will show improved agreement.  The ratio of three jet to two jet

609: cross sections has also been measured at the Tevatron as a

610: function of the sum of the \ET of all jets in the event

611: $\Sigma\ET$~\cite{TEVRATIO}. The ratio rises rapidly with

612: $\Sigma\ET$ but levels off at 0.7 above 200 GeV.  The data is

613: fairly well described by LO QCD, but as expected is sensitive to

614: the choice of renormalization scale.

615: 

616: Recently a theoretical milestone was reached with the completion

617: of NLO three jet predictions~\cite{THREEJETTHEORY}. At NLO three

618: jet predictions includes three and four parton final states.

619: Figure~\ref{THREEJET} shows a Dalitz lego plot calculated with NLO

620: QCD , where $x_{i} = 2E_{i}/M_{3J}$ and the indices $i=3,4,5$

621: represent the final state jets ordered in energy, $E_i$ is the

622: energy of the three jets, and $M_{3J}$ the invariant mass of the

623: jets.  The pronounced peaking a $x_{4} = x_{3} \sim 1$ indicates

624: that the third jet is of low energy or that the events are

625: primarily two jet in nature. The CDF collaboration has made

626: preliminary measurements of the Dalitz distributions and reports

627: good agreement, however uncertainty analysis are

628: pending~\cite{CDFTHREEJET}.

629: 

630: Multijet production also offers an opportunity to search for new

631: dynamics.  Almost all QCD data are well described by DGLAP

632: evolution which can be characterized by partonic emission strongly

633: ordered in $Q^2$. The familiar expansion $\sigma \sim (\alpha_{s}

634: ln Q^{2})^{n}$ describes a remarkable range of $x$ and $Q^2$. (See

635: the discussion of Structure Functions, for example.) However, at

636: fixed $Q^2$ and small x, Balitsky-Fadin-Kuraev-Lipatov or BFKL

637: evolution may be appropriate~\cite{BFKL}. Here $1/x$ becomes large

638: and cross sections are of the form $\sigma \sim (\alpha_{s}

639: ln(1/x))^{n}$ where $x=Q^{2}/s$ and $s$ is the center-of-mass

640: energy.  Terms in $\alpha_{s} ln(1/x)$ correspond to gluon

641: emission strongly ordered in $x$.

642: 

643: At the Tevatron, for events characterized by two jets widely

644: separated in $\Delta\eta$, the term $\alpha_{s} ln(1/x)$ is

645: proportional to $\alpha_s \Delta \eta$. BFKL

646: resummation\cite{TEVBFKLTHEORY} of these leading log terms yields

647: an exponential increase of $\sigma$ with $\Delta \eta$, $\sigma

648: \sim e^{\Delta \eta}$, this approximation is valid only for

649: $\Delta\eta

650: > 2$. Crudely, a gluon ladder between the outgoing partons increases

651: the cross section. However, the exponential growth is moderated by

652: momentum conservation (equivalently the pdf's). Sensitivity to the

653: exponential increase can be found in the ratio of cross sections

654: at different center-of-mass energies but identical $x_1$ and $x_2$

655: so that the pdf damping cancels. This ratio has been measured at

656: Tevatron energies\cite{TEVBFKLEXP} of 1800 and 630 GeV. The data

657: for $\Delta\eta> 2$ is well above and inconsistent with exact LO

658: and HERWIG predictions. (Herwig is a LO simulation which includes

659: fragmentation and hadronization). The BFKL prediction best

660: describes the data but is also 3$\sigma$ below the observation.

661: 

662: HERA is a natural site for BFKL searches since $x$ values near

663: $10^{-5}$ are accessible.  For example, inclusive $\pi^{0}$

664: production for $10^{-4} < x < 10^{-2}$ and $2 < Q^{2} < 70$

665: GeV$^2$ is well described by LO BFKL predictions but poorly

666: described by LO QCD~\cite{HERAPION}.  Likewise forward jet

667: production or production in the beam direction, $1.5 < \eta < 2.8$

668: and $10^{-4} < x < 10^{-2}$ is not described by NLO

669: QCD~\cite{HERABFKLJET}.  There is also a pronounced dependency on

670: the choice of renormalization scale.  This suggests that the

671: calculations are incomplete and something more is needed, perhaps

672: BFKL improvements, a better description of the photon structure

673: function, or next-to-next-to-leading order terms.

674: 

675: BFKL dynamics are also accessible at LEP through

676: $\gamma^{*}\gamma^{*}$ scattering where each incoming lepton

677: radiates a virtual photon. At LO the photons scattering off a

678: $q\bar{q}$ pair.  At higher orders each photon emits a $q\bar{q}$

679: pair and the two pairs interact through gluon exchange.   The L3

680: experiment at LEP has measured a rise in

681: $\sigma(\gamma^{*}\gamma^{*})$ as a function of the scattering

682: center-of-mass~\cite{LEPBFKL}.  This increased cross section can

683: be attributed to the the phase space opened up by emission of

684: additional gluons from the exchanged gluon. The rise is not

685: described by LO QCD but is described by a BFKL prediction. There

686: are abundant hints for the existence of BFKL dynamics; however,

687: all searches need improved higher-order calculations, both DGLAP

688: and BFKL, before the origins of these hints are clear. Moreover,

689: DGLAP has been impressively successful over almost all $x$ and

690: $Q^2$.

691: 

692: \section{The Structure of the Proton}

693: 

694: \noindent The proton pdf's are derived from global fits to two

695: general types of data: structure functions from $e$, $\mu$ and

696: $\nu$ scattering from nuclear targets and from exclusive state

697: production such as Drell--Yan, charm, W, jet, and photon

698: production.  Without going into details, trial pdf's are evolved

699: form a starting $Q_o$, convoluted with QCD calculations of the

700: hard scatter, and fit to the observed data. These pdf's are

701: assumed to be universal in that a single unique pdf is appropriate

702: for all reactions. Each reaction does, however, provide access to

703: a particular type of pdf.  For instance, W production in

704: $p\bar{p}$ scattering directly accesses the u and d quark pdfs.

705: Generally, quark functions are heavily constrained by DIS

706: scattering for $x < 0.9$. Until recently there has been very

707: little to constrain gluons \cite{HIGHPTGX} above $x > 0.2$ (This

708: freedom permitted the formulation of pdf's similar to CTEQ4HJ used

709: in Fig.~\ref{D0JETSLIN}.) Recent developments in pdf derivations

710: include an increased accuracy due to new types of input data,

711: replacement of prompt photon data with jet data, and concerted

712: efforts to improve the treatment of uncertainties.  For a summary

713: consult the references~\cite{DIS99}.

714: 

715: \begin{figure}[b!] %figure 5

716: \vspace{-.125in}

717: \centerline{\epsfig{file=scaling.EPS,height=4.0in,width=4.75in}}

718:  \vspace{-.1in}

719:  \caption{A compilation of structure functions over a wide range of

720: $x$ and $Q^2$.} \label{SCALING}

721: \end{figure}

722: 

723: The differential cross section $d^{2}\sigma^{NC}/dxdQ^{2}$ for NC

724: scattering, where $x$ is the momentum fraction of the struck

725: quark, can be expressed at leading order in terms of the structure

726: functions $F_{2}(x,Q^{2})$ and $F_{3}(x,Q^{2})$.  $F_2$ is

727: proportional to the sum of the valence and sea quark pdf's,

728: $q(x,Q^{2})+ \bar{q}(x,Q^{2})$. $F_3$ is proportional to the

729: difference of the valence and sea quark pdf's, $q - \bar{q}$.

730: Figure~\ref{SCALING} shows $F_2$ for $0.000032 < x < 0.65$ and $1

731: < Q^{2} < \sim 10^{4}$ GeV$^2$ as measured by the H1, SLAC, NMC

732: and BCDMS collaborations.  (To aid the eye the data at each value

733: of x is offset by an arbitrary constant.)  The H1 data is recent,

734: and ZEUS has made similar measurements~\cite{SCALINGCOMP}. The

735: curves correspond to a NLO QCD fit and include both $e^{+}p$ and

736: $e^{-}p$ data . The astonishing agreement includes both the large

737: Q$^2$ perturbative region and also the small, presumably,

738: nonperturbative Q$^2$ regions. The dependence of $F_2$ on $Q^2$ at

739: low-x region is an example of QCD scaling violations.  Although

740: not shown, the availability of both $e^{+}p$ and $e^{-}p$ NC data

741: also permits measurement of $F_3$, these results are in agreement

742: with NLO QCD~\cite{F3}.

743: 

744: \begin{figure}[b!] %figure 6

745: \vspace{-.375in}

746: \centerline{\epsfig{file=red_q2-col.eps,height=4.0in,width=4.75in}}

747:  \vspace{-.25in}

748:  \caption{The CC cross-section at various x and $Q^2$ with

749: predictions for the various quark contributions.}

750: \label{CCSTFUNC}

751: \end{figure}

752: 

753: Charge current reactions couple directly to the quark

754: distributions. Specifically, $d^{2}\sigma^{CC}(e^{-}p)/dxdQ^{2}$

755: is proportional to the u and c quark distributions, and

756: $d^{2}\sigma^{CC}(e^{+}p)/dxdQ^{2}$ is proportional to the d

757: quark.  Figure~\ref{CCSTFUNC} shows a reduced CC cross section for

758: various $Q^2$ bins as a function of $x$ for $e^{-}p$

759: data~\cite{HERAQ}. The uppermost curve in each panel represents

760: the total cross section as predicted by NLO QCD using the CTEQ5D

761: pdf. Agreement is good at all $x$ and $Q$. The lower curves

762: indicate the contribution from each type of quark. As expected the

763: u quark contribution is dominant.

764: 

765: Additional constraints on the quark distributions below $x \sim

766: 0.7$ can be derived from fixed target and $p\bar{p}$ scattering. A

767: few recent examples are listed here.  The CCFR collaboration has

768: re-analyzed its $\nu$ and $\bar{\nu}$ DIS data and finds $F_2$ for

769: $0.015 < x < 0.175$ and $1 < Q^{2} < 100$ GeV$^2$ well described

770: by updated NLO QCD predictions~\cite{CCFR}. CCFR has also made the

771: first measurement of $F_{3}^{\nu} - F_{3}^{\bar{\nu}}$.  The

772: rapidity distributions of the final state leptons in the

773: Drell--Yan process $p\bar{p} \rightarrow \gamma^{*}/Z \rightarrow

774: e^{+}e^{-}$  is sensitive to the valence quark distributions. For

775: example, if the two initial partons are of unequal momentum the

776: virtual $\gamma^{*}/Z$ will be boosted in the direction of the

777: more energetic parton and the decay electrons will likewise be

778: boosted.  Analysis of the rapidity distributions as recently

779: measured by the CDF collaboration constrains the u and d

780: distributions for $0.05 < x < 0.6$~\cite{DRELLYAN}. Recent results

781: also pertain to the sea-quark distributions, the cross sections

782: for $\mu^{+}\mu^{-}$ production from $pp$ and $pd$ scattering as

783: measured by the E866 collaboration constrains the $\bar{d} -

784: \bar{u}$ sea distribution between $x \sim 0.03$ and $\sim

785: 0.3$~\cite{DIS99}.

786: 

787: As mentioned earlier, the large-x gluon distributions are not well

788: known.  Until recently, a favored process for constraining $g(x)$

789: in the global fits was direct photon production. The associated

790: Compton graph samples $g(x)$ directly.  However, this process has

791: fallen out of favor since NLO calculations cannot describe the

792: world data~\cite{KT}.  For nearly every photon cross section

793: measurement, the data exceeds theory at the low end of that

794: specific measurement's $x$ range. This discrepancy has been

795: attributed to initial-state soft radiation which manifests itself

796: as transverse momentum or $k_T$. If not interpreted correctly,

797: this $k_T$ or ''kick'' adds to the measured $x$ of the photon

798: which creates the observed excess of data over theory. Evidence

799: for $k_T$ comes from events where object pairs such as pions,

800: diphotons, dimuons, and dijets are produced. The vector sum of the

801: pair momentum is a direct measure of the parton scatter transverse

802: kick. Indirect evidence comes from the observation that

803: augmentation of NLO predictions with a phenomenological addition

804: of $k_T$ dramatically improves agreement between data and theory.

805: Also, the importance of soft gluon resummation for Drell-Yan,

806: diphoton, W, and Z production was recognized some time ago.

807: Similar calculations for direct photon production are underway and

808: already show much better agreement between data and theory.

809: Perhaps with time and higher orders photon data will return to the

810: pdf fits.

811: 

812: \begin{figure}[b!] %figure 7

813: \vspace{-.125in}

814: \centerline{\epsfig

815: {file=errors.ps,height=3.0in,width=4.0in}}

816: \caption{Allowed variations of the gluon and quark pdf's assuming

817: symmetric Gaussian uncertainties associated with the global fit.}

818: \label{PDFERRORS}

819: \end{figure}

820: 

821: In the meantime, the central inclusive jet cross sections

822: constrain $g(x)$ for $\sim0.05 < x < \sim0.5$.  Inclusion of the

823: full inclusive cross section for $p\bar{p}$ scattering over $\AEA

824: < 3.0$ will cover $x < \sim 0.8$~\cite{D0JETS2000}.  Even more can

825: be gained from triple differential cross sections, $d^{3}\sigma /

826: d\ET d\eta_{1} d\eta_{2}$ where \ET corresponds to the leading jet

827: in an event and the subscripts identify the leading two

828: jets~\cite{ANNREV}.  For a dijet event if both jets are at

829: $\eta=0$ with $\ET = 180$ GeV then $x_1 = x_2 = 0.2$. However, for

830: $\eta=0$ and $\ET= 90$ GeV with the second jet at $\eta=2$,

831: $x_1=0.2$ and $x_2 = \sim 0.9$.  Since the event structure is

832: boosted forward a much greater fraction of the initial hadron

833: momentum is required. Both Tevatron experiments are encouraged to

834: publish their preliminary differential cross

835: sections~\cite{ANNREV,CDFTHREEJET} since NLO predictions exists

836: and the data could be incorporated into the pdf's.  Dijet

837: production at HERA, through the boson fusion graph, also directly

838: measures $g(x) < 0.1$~\cite{HERAGX}. Although the data doesn't

839: greatly alter the pdfs's relative to the $F_2$ data it does add

840: stability to the fits and reduce errors.

841: 

842: Until recently the uncertainties of observables due to pdf's were

843: estimated merely by using a menu of pdf's.  However, pdf's should

844: more properly handle statistical and systematic data

845: uncertainties, theoretical uncertainties, and parameterizations.

846: In the past year or two, there has been very great progress

847: dealing with these uncertainties~\cite{BOTJE,GIELE,QCDII}. For

848: instance, the plot below by Botje shows the allowed variations in

849: the gluon and quark distributions due to statistical

850: uncertainties, input choices, analysis cuts, and renormalization

851: choices assuming all uncertainties are symmetric and Gaussian in

852: nature~\cite{BOTJE}. Notice the unconstrained nature of the gluon

853: distributions, Tevatron jet results were not included in this

854: calculation. An even more general approach by Giele and Keller

855: incorporates probability distributions to derive the

856: pdf's~\cite{GIELE}. These authors and others are providing tools

857: for incorporating all sources of pdf uncertainties.

858: 

859: 

860: \section{Status of $\alpha_s$ Measurements}

861: 

862: \noindent An enormous body of research has been dedicated to the

863: study of the strong coupling constant, $\alpha_{s}$ since it is

864: the only free parameter of QCD and must be determined

865: experimentally.  Of equal interest is the dependence of the

866: coupling constant on momentum transfer $Q^{2}$, $\alpha_{s}(Q^{2})

867: = 12\pi/(33-n_{f})log(Q^{2}/\Lambda^{2})$ where $n_{f}$ is the

868: number of quark flavors and $\Lambda$ is experimentally

869: determined. Notice $\alpha_{s}$ decreases or ``runs'' with

870: momentum transfer. This is, in fact, the basis for the

871: perturbative NLO QCD calculations described earlier.

872: 

873: The strong coupling constant can be derived in a myriad of ways

874: and at all $Q^2$, from absolute decay rates of the $Z$ boson and

875: $\tau$ lepton, energy levels of bound heavy quarks, jet event

876: shapes, jet production rates and angular distributions, and

877: scaling violations in deep inelastic scattering. Notable new

878: measurements of $\alpha_s$ originate from all three high energy

879: colliders.  In particular, the LEP collaborations recently ran at

880: center--of--mass energies from 192 to 202 GeV and from event shape

881: and jet rate measurements determined an average

882: $\alpha_{s}(198GeV)= 0.109 \pm 0.001 \pm 0.005$ where the first

883: error is statistical and the second theoretical \cite{LEP1999}. A

884: uniform re-analysis of $e^{+}e^{-}$ event shapes, jet rates, and

885: multiplicities from the JADE and LEP collaborations from

886: center-of-mass energies between 20 and 200 GeV show the strong

887: coupling constant obviously running with a value of

888: $\alpha_{s}(M_{Z})= 0.1208 \pm 0.0006 \pm 0.0048$~\cite{LEP1999}.

889: Finally, comparison of NLO inclusive jet and dijet cross section

890: predictions to experimental results from HERA and the Tevatron

891: consistently yield $\alpha_s(M_{Z})$ measurements near

892: 0.12~\cite{HERAGX,CDFALPHA}.  The Tevatron inclusive jet

893: measurement beautifully demonstrates the running of $\alpha_s$

894: over $10^3 < Q^{2} < 2\times10^5$ GeV$^2$.

895: 

896: An excellent review by Bethke includes a comprehensive compilation

897: of the many derivations of $\alpha_{s}$ complete with a

898: description and evaluation of each measurement \cite{BETHKE}. The

899: current world average for the coupling constant,

900: $\alpha_{s}(M_{Z}) = 0.1184 \pm 0.0031$, is based on six

901: measurements for which next-to-next-to-leading order predictions

902: exist. The average is known to better than 3\% and is unchanged

903: since 1997~\cite{SCHMELLING}.

904: 

905: \section{Conclusions}

906: \noindent QCD, and in particular perturbative QCD, describes the

907: strong interaction over an impressive kinematic range. At the

908: highest $Q^2$ accessible, recent data and analyses reveal few, if

909: any, excursions from the Standard Model.  At intermediate $Q^2$,

910: jet and multi-jet studies have permitted a closer study of higher

911: order process and searches for BFKL dynamics.  These searches are

912: ambiguous. The proton structure functions are under intense study.

913: Although the quark components are well constrained, the gluon

914: component is not well measured for $x>0.2$. Recent jet and, if

915: rehabilitated, photon production data should improve this

916: situation. There has also been great progress on pdf error

917: analysis.  Data from all values of $Q^2$ have contributed to a

918: precise 3\% measurement of the strong coupling constant.

919: 

920: \nonumsection{Acknowledgements} \noindent Many individuals from

921: the Tevatron, HERA, LEP and fixed target experiments have assisted

922: with the preparation of this document.  Space does not permit

923: individual recognition, many thanks to all. I would also like to

924: acknowledge the support of the NSF.

925: 

926: \nonumsection{References} \noindent \vspace{-.125in}

927: 

928: \begin{thebibliography}{000}

929: \vspace{-.125in}

930: \bibitem{JETALGS} G.C. Blazey {\it et al.}, ``Run II Jet Physics'',

931: hep-ex/0005012, (2000).

932: 

933: \bibitem{D0JETS2000} L.Babukhadia, ``Central and Foward Inc.

934: Jets at the Tevatron'', hep-ex/005026, (2000).

935: 

936: \bibitem{D0JETS1995} B. Abbott {\it et al.}(D\O), Phys.Rev.Lett.

937: {\bf 82} 2451 (1999).

938: 

939: \bibitem{CDFPRL} F.Abe {\it et al.} (CDF), Phys. Rev. Lett.,

940: {\bf 77} 438 (1996).

941: 

942: \bibitem{GGKEKS}  W.T.Giele, E.W.N.Glover, and D.A.Kosower, Nucl. Phys.

943: B{\bf 403}, 633 (1993) and S.Ellis {\it et al.} Phys. Rev. Lett.,

944: {\bf 64} 2121 (1900).

945: 

946: \bibitem{ANNREV} G.C.Blazey and B.L.Flaugher, Ann.Rev.Nucl.Part.Sci., {\bf 49}

947:  663 (1999).

948: 

949: \bibitem{D0ANG95}B. Abbott {\it et al.} (D\O), Phys.Rev.Lett.,

950: {\bf 80} 666 (1998) and F.Abe {\it et al.} (CDF), Phys. Rev.

951: Lett., {\bf 77} 5336(1996).

952: 

953: \bibitem{D0DIJETMASS} B. Abbott {\it et al.} (D\O), Phys.Rev.Lett.,

954: {\bf 82} 2457 (1999).

955: 

956: \bibitem{CDFDIJETMASS}F.Abe {\it et al.} (CDF), Phys. Rev.,

957: {\bf D48} 998 (1993).

958: 

959: \bibitem{H1NEW} K.Nagano (H1), ``Inclusive Measurement

960: of DIS Scattering at High $Q^2$ in $e^{+}p$ Collisions at HERA'',

961: ICHEP2000, Osaka ,Japan (2000).

962: 

963: \bibitem{ZEUSHIGH} J. Breitwig {\it et al.} (ZEUS), Eur.Phys.J

964: {\bf C11} 427 (1999).

965: 

966: \bibitem{H1HIGH} C. Adloff {\it et al.} (H1), Eur.

967: Phys.J. {\bf C13} 609 (2000).

968: 

969: \bibitem{ZEUSNEW} (ZEUS), ``Measurement of high-$Q^2$

970: CC cross sections in $e^{-}p$ DIS at HERA'' and ``Measurement of

971: high-$Q^2$ NC cross sections in $e^{-}p$ DIS and a first

972: measurement of the structure function $xF_3$ at HERA'', ICHEP2000,

973: Osaka Japan.

974: 

975: \bibitem{HERADIJET} C. Adloff {\it et al.} (H1),

976: hep-ex/0010054 (2000) and (ZEUS), ``Inclusive jet cross sections

977: in NC DIS in the Breit Frame'' and ``Measurement of differential

978: cross sections for dijet production NC DIS at high $Q^2$ and

979: determination of $\alpha_s$'', ICHEP2000, Osaka Japan.

980: 

981: \bibitem{HERATRIJET} (H1), ``Study of Three-Jet Production

982: in DIS $e{+}p$ Collisions at HERA'' HEP99, Tapere Finland,

983: H1prelim-99-141, (2000).

984: 

985: \bibitem{TEVRATIO} B. Abbott {\it et al.} (D\O), Sub.Phys.Rev.Lett.,

986: hep-ex/0009012 (2000).

987: 

988: \bibitem{THREEJETTHEORY} W.Kilgore and W.Giele, ``Hadronic 3-Jet

989: Production at NLO'', hep-ph/9903361 (1999).

990: 

991: \bibitem{CDFTHREEJET} A.Brandel,``NLO 3-jet Comparisons at the

992: Tev.'',Moriond QCD, LesArcs,France (2000).

993: 

994: \bibitem{BFKL}Y.Y.~Balitsky and L.N.~Lipatov, Sov. J. Nucl.

995: Phys. {\bf 28}, 822 (1978).

996: 

997: \bibitem{TEVBFKLTHEORY}A.H.~Mueller and H.~Navelet, Nucl. Phys.

998: {\bf B282} 727 (1987).

999: 

1000: \bibitem{TEVBFKLEXP} B. Abbott {\it et al.} (D\O), Phys.Rev.Lett.,

1001: {\bf 84} 5722 (2000).

1002: 

1003: \bibitem{HERAPION} C. Adloff {\it et al.}, (H1), Phys. Lett. {\bf B462} 440 (1999)

1004: 

1005: \bibitem{HERABFKLJET} T. Schoerner, (H1) ``Single-inclusive and Forward

1006: Jets at low $Q^2$ at HERA'', ICHEP2000, Osaka, Japan,

1007: H1prelim-00-032, (2000).

1008: 

1009: \bibitem{LEPBFKL} C.Lin, ``Meas. of $\gamma^{*}\gamma^{*}$

1010: collisions at LEP'', Moriond QCD, Les Arcs, France (2000)

1011: 

1012: \bibitem{HIGHPTGX} S.Kuhlmann {\it et al.}, ``Parton Densities at

1013: High-x'', hep-ph/0007141, (2000).

1014: 

1015: \bibitem{DIS99} U.Bassler {\it et al.}, ``Sum. of the SF Work. Group at

1016: DIS99'', hep-ex/9906027, (1999).

1017: 

1018: \bibitem{SCALINGCOMP} E.Rizvi (H1), ``NC and CC DIS at High

1019: Q2'' and A.Kappes (ZEUS), ``NC/CC DIS at very high Q2'', DIS2000,

1020: Liverpool, UK (2000).

1021: 

1022: \bibitem{F3} N.Tuning, ``Proton SFs F2 and xF3 at

1023: ZEUS'', DIS2000 Liverpool, UK, (2000).

1024: 

1025: \bibitem{HERAQ} (ZEUS), ``Measrurement of high-$Q^2$ CC cross

1026: sections in $e^{-}p$ DIS at HERA'', ICHEP2000, Osaka, Japan

1027: (2000).

1028: 

1029: \bibitem{CCFR} A. Bodek, these proceedings and hep-ex/0009061, (2000).

1030: 

1031: \bibitem{DRELLYAN} T.Affolder {\it et al.} (CDF) Sub.Phys.

1032: Rev.Lett., hep-ex/0006025, (2000).

1033: 

1034: \bibitem{KT} L.Apanasevich {\it et al.}, ``Examination of

1035: direct-photon and pion production in proton-nucleon collisions'',

1036: hep-ph/0007191, (2000).

1037: 

1038: \bibitem{HERAGX}   T. Hadig, ``The strong coupling and the gluon

1039: density from jets in DIS'', DIS Workshop, Liverpool,

1040: hep-ex/0008027 (2000).

1041: 

1042: \bibitem{BOTJE} M.Botje, ``A QCD Analysis of HERA and Fixed Target

1043: Structure Function Data'', hep-ph/9912439, (2000).

1044: 

1045: \bibitem{GIELE} W.Giele, private communication, (2000).

1046: 

1047: \bibitem{QCDII} L.deBarbaro {\it et al.}, Parton Distributions Working Group:

1048: QCD and Weak Boson Physics at Run II Workshop, Fermilab, Batavia,

1049: IL (2000).

1050: 

1051: \bibitem{LEP1999} O.Biebel, ``$\alpha_s$: Evolution from 35 Gev to 202 Gev and

1052: flavour independece'', Moriond QCD, Les Arcs, France (2000)

1053: 

1054: \bibitem{CDFALPHA} W.T.Giele, E.W.N.Glover, J.Yu, Phys. Rev. {\bf

1055: D53}, 120 (1996) and www-cdf.fnal.gov

1056: 

1057: \bibitem{BETHKE} S.Bethke, J. Physics G, {\bf 26} 27 (2000).

1058: 

1059: \bibitem{SCHMELLING} M.Schmelling, ``Status of the Strong Coupling

1060:         Constant'', ICHEP, Warsaw, (1996).

1061: 

1062: 

1063: \end{thebibliography}

1064: 

1065: 

1066: \end{document}