1: \documentclass[12pt,a4paper,dvips]{article}
2: \usepackage{a4p}
3: \usepackage{cite,mcite}
4: \usepackage{graphicx}
5: \usepackage{rotating,a4p,here}
6: \usepackage{phy_susy, amssymb}
7: \usepackage{amsmath}
8: \usepackage{l3_title,ifthen}
9: \journalname{Eur. Phys. J.}
10: \date{October 10, 2000}
11: \preprint{2000-130}
12: \newlength{\capindent}
13: \setlength{\capindent}{1.0cm}
14: \newlength{\capwidth}
15: \setlength{\capwidth}{\textwidth}
16: \addtolength{\capwidth}{-2\capindent}
17: \newlength{\figwidth}
18: \setlength{\figwidth}{\textwidth}
19: \addtolength{\figwidth}{-2.0cm}
20: \newcommand{\icaption}[2][!*!,!]{\hspace*{\capindent}%
21: \begin{minipage}{\capwidth}
22: \ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{!*!,!}}%
23: {\caption{#2}}%
24: {\caption[#1]{#2}}
25: \end{minipage}}
26: %
27: % Shorthand for \phantom to use in tables
28: \newcommand{\pho}{\phantom{0}}
29: \newcommand{\phouno}{\phantom{1}}
30: \newcommand{\phoescl}{\phantom{!}}
31: \newcommand{\rpvpha}{\vphantom{$\overline{\slep_j}$}}
32: \newcommand{\rpvpham}{\vphantom{$\underline{\mchid}$}}
33: \newcommand{\bslash}{\ensuremath{\backslash}}
34: \newcommand{\BibTeX}{{\sc Bib\TeX}}
35: % Upsilion(1S)
36: \newcommand{\UoneS}{\ensuremath{\Upsilon(\mathrm{1S})}}
37: %
38: \newcommand{\stp}{\tilde{t}_1}
39: \newcommand{\stpbar}{\bar{\tilde{t}}_1}
40: %
41: %
42: \def\vctr#1{\hfil\vbox to-1em{\vss\hbox{#1}\vss}\hfil}%
43: \def\vdsp#1#2{\hfil\vbox to#2em{\vss\hbox{#1}\vss}\hfil}%
44: %
45: \def\lamdue{\ifmath{\lambda_{122}}}
46: \def\lamtre{\ifmath{\lambda_{133}}}
47: \def\lamuno{\ifmath{\lambda''_{212}}}
48: \def\ytq{\ifmath{y_{34}}}
49: \def\Ytq{\ifmath{Y_{34}}}
50: \def\yqc{\ifmath{y_{45}}}
51: \def\ycs{\ifmath{y_{56}}}
52: \def\ycut{\ifmath{y_{cut}}}
53: \def\ylm{\ifmath{y_{\it \ell m}}}
54: %\def\Emiss{\ifmath{\not\!\!{E}}}
55: \def\Emiss{\ensuremath{E\hspace{-.23cm}/\hspace{+.01cm}}}
56: \def\LLE{\ifmath{\mathrm{L}_{i}\mathrm{L}_{j}{\overline{\mathrm E}_{k}}}}
57: \def\LQD{\ifmath{\mathrm{L}_{i}\mathrm{Q}_{j}{\overline{\mathrm D}_{k}}}}
58: \def\UDD{\ifmath{{\overline{\mathrm U}_{i}}{\overline{\mathrm D}_{j}}{\overline{\mathrm D}_{k}}}}
59: \def\snu{\ifmath{\tilde{\nu}}}
60: \def\snue{\ifmath{\tilde{\nu_e}}}
61: \def\snum{\ifmath{\tilde{\nu_{\mu}}}}
62: \def\snut{\ifmath{\tilde{\nu_{\tau}}}}
63: \def\slep{\ifmath{\tilde{\ell}}}
64: \def\slepp{\ifmath{\tilde{\ell}^+_R}}
65: \def\slepm{\ifmath{\tilde{\ell}^-_R}}
66: \def\slepr{\ifmath{\tilde{\ell}_R}}
67: %
68: \def\serr{\ifmath{\tilde{\rm e}_R}}
69: \def\serp{\ifmath{\tilde{\rm e}^+_R}}
70: \def\serm{\ifmath{\tilde{\rm e}^-_R}}
71: \def\smur{\ifmath{\tilde{\mu}_R}}
72: \def\smurp{\ifmath{\tilde{\mu}^+_R}}
73: \def\smurm{\ifmath{\tilde{\mu}^-_R}}
74: \def\staur{\ifmath{\tilde{\tau}_R}}
75: \def\staurp{\ifmath{\tilde{\tau}^+_R}}
76: \def\staurm{\ifmath{\tilde{\tau}^-_R}}
77: %
78: % SUSY particle symbols:
79: \def\susy#1{\ensuremath{\tilde{\mathrm{#1}}}}%
80: \def\slepton #1{\ensuremath{\susy{\ell}^{#1}}}
81: %\def\selectron #1{\ensuremath{\susy{e}^{#1}}}
82: %\def\smuon #1{\ensuremath{\susy{\mu}^{#1}}}
83: %\def\stau #1{\ensuremath{\susy{\tau}^{#1}}}
84: %\def\sneutrino {\susy{\nu}}
85: %\def\chargino #1{\ensuremath{\susy{\chi}_1^{#1}}}
86: %\def\charginos #1{\ensuremath{\susy{\chi}_{1,2}^{#1}}}
87: \def\neutralino#1{\ensuremath{\susy{\chi}_{#1}^0}}
88: %
89: \def\nn{\ensuremath{\tilde{\chi}_1^0~\tilde{\chi}_1^0~}}
90: \def\cc{\ensuremath{\tilde{\chi}_1^+~\tilde{\chi}_1^-~}}
91: \def\nei{\ensuremath{\tilde{\chi}_1^0~}}
92: \def\neii{\ensuremath{\tilde{\chi}_2^0~}}
93: \def\neiii{\ensuremath{\tilde{\chi}_3^0~}}
94: \def\neiiii{\ensuremath{\tilde{\chi}_4^0~}}
95: \def\mo{\ensuremath{m_0~}}
96: \def\md{\ensuremath{M_2~}}
97: \def\tb{\ensuremath{\tan\beta}}
98: \def\ch{\ensuremath{\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm~}}
99:
100: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
101: % This is where the document really begins
102: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
103: %
104: \begin{document}
105: %
106: \begin{titlepage}
107: %
108: \title{ \boldmath{Search for R-parity Violating Decays of Supersymmetric
109: Particles in $\mathrm{e^+e^-}$ Collisions at
110: $\sqrt{s}=$ 189~\GeV}}
111:
112: \author{The L3 Collaboration}
113: %
114: % The abstract
115: %
116: \begin{abstract}
117: A search for chargino, neutralino and scalar lepton
118: pair-production in $\mathrm \epem$
119: collisions at the centre-of-mass energy of 189 \GeV{}
120: is performed under the assumptions that R-parity is not
121: conserved in decays and only one of the coupling constants
122: $\lambda_{ ijk}$, $\lambda'_{ ijk}$ or $\lambda''_{ ijk}$
123: is non-negligible.
124: No signal is found in a data sample corresponding to an
125: integrated luminosity of 176.4 \pbi.
126: Limits on the production cross sections,
127: on the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model parameters
128: and on the masses of the supersymmetric particles
129: are derived.
130:
131:
132: \end{abstract}
133:
134:
135:
136: %
137: \submitted
138: \end{titlepage}
139:
140:
141: \section{Introduction}
142:
143: The most general superpotential of the
144: Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) ~\cite{MSSM}, which describes
145: a supersymmetric, renormalizable
146: and gauge invariant theory, with minimal particle content, includes
147: the term $\mathrm{W_R}$~\cite{superp,superp2}:
148: %
149: %
150: \begin{equation} \mathrm{W_R} =
151: % \mathrm {\mu_{i}} \mathrm{L}_{i} \mathrm{H_2} \, +
152: \lambda_{ ijk} \mathrm L_i \mathrm L_j \overline{\mathrm E}_k \, +
153: \lambda'_{ ijk} \mathrm L_i \mathrm Q_j \overline{\mathrm D}_k \, +
154: \lambda''_{ ijk} \overline{\mathrm U}_i \overline{\mathrm D}_j
155: \overline{\mathrm D}_k\,,
156: % \epsilon_i \mathrm L_i \mathrm H_2 \,,
157: \label{eqn:wr}
158: \end{equation}
159: %
160: where $\lambda_{ ijk}$, $\lambda'_{ ijk}$ and $\lambda''_{ ijk}$
161: are the Yukawa couplings
162: and {\it i, j} and {\it k} the generation indices;
163: $\mathrm L_i$ and $\mathrm Q_i$ are the left-handed lepton- and
164: quark-doublet superfields,
165: $\overline{\mathrm E}_i$, $\overline{\mathrm D}_i$ and $\overline{\mathrm U}_i$
166: are the right-handed singlet superfields for
167: charged leptons, down- and up-type quarks, respectively.
168: In order to prevent the simultaneous presence of identical fermionic
169: fields, the following antisymmetry relations are required:
170: $\mathrm \lambda_{ ijk} = - \lambda_{ jik}$
171: and $\mathrm \lambda''_{ ijk} = - \lambda''_{ ikj}$,
172: reducing to $\mathrm{9 + 27 + 9}$ the total number of independent
173: Yukawa couplings.
174: %
175: %
176: The $\LLE$ and $\LQD$ terms violate the leptonic quantum number L, while
177: the $\UDD$ terms violate the baryonic quantum number B.
178:
179: The simultaneous presence of L- and B-violating terms would
180: lead to a fast proton decay\footnote{With contributions at the tree level
181: from $\lambda'_{11k} \lambda''_{11k}$, and at one-loop level from
182: any product $\lambda_{ijk} \lambda''_{lmn}$ or
183: $\lambda'_{ijk} \lambda''_{lmn}$.}~\cite{weinberg}. Therefore, existing
184: limits~\cite{pdg2000} on the proton lifetime require either of two
185: possibilities.
186:
187: The first one is to impose R-parity conservation,
188: which forbids all terms in Equation~\ref{eqn:wr}. R-parity is
189: a multiplicative quantum number defined as:
190: %
191: \begin{equation} \mathrm
192: R = (-1)^{\mathrm {3B+L+2S}}\,,
193: \end{equation}
194: where~S~is~the~spin.~R~ is $+1$~for~all~ordinary
195: particles,~and~$-1$~for~their~supersymmetric partners.
196: If R-parity is conserved, supersymmetric particles can be
197: produced only in pairs and they decay in cascade to the lightest supersymmetric
198: particle (LSP), which is stable~\cite{rpc_susy}.
199:
200: The second possibility is considered in this paper.
201: Since the absence of either the B-violating or the L-violating terms
202: is enough to prevent a fast proton decay, there is no need to
203: impose {\it a priori} R-parity conservation.
204: As a consequence, two new kinds of processes are allowed:
205: single production of supersymmetric particles, or
206: LSP decays into Standard Model particles
207: via scalar lepton or quark exchange. In the latter case, the MSSM
208: production mechanisms are unaltered by the operators in
209: Equation~\ref{eqn:wr}.
210:
211: In this paper, we describe the
212: search for pair-produced neutralinos\footnote{Single production of
213: supersymmetric particles is not considered in this paper.}
214: ($\mathrm \epem \ra \chim\chin$,
215: with $m = 1,2 \,$ and $n = 1,..,4$),
216: charginos ($\mathrm \epem \ra \chap\cham$)
217: and scalar leptons ($\mathrm \epem \ra \slepp \slepm$,
218: $\epem \ra \snu\snu$)
219: with subsequent R-parity violating decays, assuming that only
220: one of the coupling constants $\lambda_{ ijk}$, $\lambda'_{ ijk}$
221: or $\lambda''_{ ijk}$ is non-negligible.
222: Only $\slepr$ (supersymmetric partners of the right-handed charged leptons)
223: are considered in this analysis, since they are expected to be lighter
224: than the corresponding left-handed ones.
225:
226: Supersymmetric particles can decay directly into two or three fermions
227: according to the dominant interaction term, as detailed in
228: Table~\ref{tab:decays}. Indirect decays via the LSP can occur as well.
229: Four-body decays of the lightest scalar lepton are also taken into
230: account in the case of $\lambda'_{ ijk}$ and $\lambda''_{ ijk}$.
231: In the present analysis, the dominant coupling is assumed to be greater than
232: $10^{-5}$~\cite{dawson}, corresponding to decay lengths less than 1 cm.
233: Previous L3 results on $\lambda_{ ijk}$ and
234: $\lambda''_{ ijk}$ Yukawa couplings can be found in Reference~\citen{rpv_l3}.
235: Searches for R-parity violating decays of supersymmetric particles
236: were also performed by other LEP experiments~\cite{rpv_publ}.
237:
238: %\clearpage
239: \begin{table*} [htbp]
240: \begin{center}
241: \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline
242:
243: \multicolumn{1}{|c|} {Particle}
244: &\multicolumn{3}{c|} {Direct decays }
245: &\multicolumn{2}{|c|} {Indirect decays } \\ \cline{2-6}
246:
247: %\vspace{+0.4 cm}
248: \multicolumn{1}{|c|} { }
249: &\multicolumn{1}{c|} {$\lambda_{ ijk}$}
250: &\multicolumn{1}{c|} {$\lambda'_{ ijk}$}
251: &\multicolumn{1}{c|} {$\lambda''_{ ijk}$}
252: &\multicolumn{1}{|c|} { via $\neutralino{1}$}
253: &\multicolumn{1}{|c|} { via \vphantom{$\overline{\slep_j}$}
254: $\slep$} \\ \hline
255:
256: $\chio$ \vphantom{$\overline{\slep_j}$}
257: & $ \ell_i^- \nu_j \ell_k^+$, $\nu_i \ell^+_j \ell^-_k$
258: & $ \ell_i^- {\mathrm u_j} \bar{\mathrm d}_k$, $\nu_i \, \mathrm d_j
259: \bar{\mathrm d}_k$
260: & $ \bar{\mathrm u}_i \bar{\mathrm d}_j \bar{\mathrm d}_k$
261: & $-$
262: & $\ell\slep$ \\ \hline
263:
264: $\neutralino{n (n \ge 2)}$ \vphantom{$\overline{\slep_j}$}
265: & $ \ell_i^- \nu_j \ell_k^+$, $\nu_i \ell^+_j \ell^-_k$
266: & $ \ell_i^- {\mathrm u_j} \bar{\mathrm d}_k$, $\nu_i \, \mathrm d_j
267: \bar{\mathrm d}_k$
268: & $ \bar{\mathrm u}_i \bar{\mathrm d}_j \bar{\mathrm d}_k$
269: & $\Zstar\chio$, $\Zstar\chim_{(m < n)}$,
270: & $\ell\slep$ \\
271:
272: { }
273: &
274: &
275: &
276: & $\Wstar\cha$
277: & \\ \hline
278:
279: $\chap$ \vphantom{$\overline{\slep}_j$}
280: & $ \nu_i \nu_j \ell^+_k$, $\ell^+_i \ell^+_j \ell^-_k$
281: & $\nu_i u_j \bar{\mathrm d}_k$, $\ell^+_i \bar{\mathrm d}_j
282: \mathrm d_k$
283: & $\bar{\mathrm d}_i \bar{\mathrm d}_j \bar{\mathrm d}_k$,
284: $\mathrm u_i \mathrm u_j \mathrm d_k$,
285: & $\Wstar\chio$, $\Wstar\chid$
286: & \\
287:
288: { }
289: &
290: &
291: & $\mathrm u_i \mathrm d_j \mathrm u_k$
292: &
293: & \\ \hline
294:
295:
296: $\slep^-_{kR}$ \vphantom{$\overline{\slep_j}$}
297: & $\nu_i \ell^-_j$, $\nu_j \ell^-_i$
298: & $-$
299: & $-$
300: & $\ell^-_k \chio$
301: & $-$ \\ \hline
302:
303: $\snu_{i}$, $\snu_{j}$
304: & $\ell^-_j \ell^+_k$, $\ell^-_i \ell^+_k$
305: & $-$
306: & $-$
307: & $\nu_i \chio$, $\nu_j \chio$
308: & \\ \hline
309:
310:
311: \end{tabular}
312: \caption{R-parity violating decays of the supersymmetric
313: particles considered in this analysis.
314: Charged conjugate states are implied. Indirect decays
315: via scalar leptons are relevant only for neutralinos when the scalar
316: lepton is the LSP. Only
317: supersymmetric partners of the right-handed charged leptons are taken
318: into account. Decays to more than three fermions are not listed.
319: $\Zstar$ and $\Wstar$ indicate virtual Z and W.}
320: \label{tab:decays}
321: \end{center}
322: \end{table*}
323:
324:
325: \section{Data and Monte Carlo Samples}
326:
327: The data used correspond to an integrated luminosity of 176.4 \pbi{}
328: collected by the L3 detector~\cite{L3}
329: at the centre-of-mass energy ($\sqrt s$) of 189 \GeV.
330:
331: The signal events are generated with the program {\tt SUSYGEN}~\cite{susygen}
332: for different mass values and
333: for all possible choices of the generation indices.
334:
335:
336: The following Monte Carlo
337: generators are used to simulate Standard Model background processes:
338: {\tt PYTHIA}~\cite{pythia} for
339: $\mathrm \epem \ra \qqbar$,
340: $\; \mathrm \epem \ra \mathrm Z \, \epem$ and $\mathrm \epem \ra$ ZZ,
341: {\tt BHWIDE}~\cite{bhwide} for $\mathrm \epem \ra \epem $,
342: {\tt KORALZ}~\cite{koralz} for $\mathrm \epem \ra \mpmm$ and
343: $\mathrm \epem \ra \tautau$,
344: {\tt PHOJET}~\cite{phojet} and {\tt PYTHIA}
345: for $\mathrm \epem \ra \epem$ hadrons,
346: {\tt DIAG36}~\cite{diag36} for $\mathrm \epem \ra
347: \epem \ell^+ \ell^-$ ($\mathrm{\ell = e, \mu, \tau}$),
348: {\tt KORALW}~\cite{koralw} for $\mathrm \epem \ra \WpWm $ and
349: {\tt EXCALIBUR}~\cite{EXCALIBUR} for
350: $\ee \rightarrow \mathrm{W^\pm\, \ell\,^\mp \nu}$.
351: The number of simulated events corresponds to
352: at least 50 times the luminosity of the data,
353: except for Bhabha and two-photon processes,
354: where the Monte Carlo samples correspond to
355: 2 to 6 times the luminosity.
356:
357: %
358: The detector response is simulated using the {\tt GEANT}
359: package~\cite{geant}. It takes into account effects of energy loss,
360: multiple scattering and showering in the detector materials. Hadronic
361: interactions are simulated with the
362: {\tt GHEISHA} program~\cite{gheisha}. Time dependent inefficiencies
363: of the different subdetectors are also taken into account
364: in the simulation procedure.
365:
366: \section{Event reconstruction}
367:
368: Leptons ($\ell = $ e, $\mu, \tau$) and hadronic jets are reconstructed
369: as follows.
370: An electron is defined as an electromagnetic shower, with energy
371: greater than 1 \gev, matched with a track in the central chamber.
372: Muon identification requires a track in the muon chambers matched with
373: a track in the central chamber.
374: Hadronic tau decays are reconstructed from narrow isolated hadronic
375: jets with energy greater than 2 \gev{} and one to three associated
376: tracks. The tau energy must be contained in a cone of $10^\circ$
377: half-opening angle around the jet direction.
378: No additional tracks and no more than two additional calorimetric
379: clusters are required in a further cone of $30^\circ$ half-opening
380: angle. The ratio of the energies in the two cones has to be less than 2.0.
381: Remaining clusters and tracks are classified as hadrons. Jets are
382: reconstructed with the DURHAM algorithm~\cite{durham}.
383: The jet resolution parameter $y_{mn}$ is defined
384: as the $\ycut$ value at which the event configuration changes from $n$ to
385: $m$ jets.
386: $N_{jets8}$ is the number of jets clustered with $\ycut$ fixed
387: and equal to 0.008.
388: The acollinearity ($\theta_{acol}$)
389: and acoplanarity ($\theta_{acop}$) angles are calculated
390: by forcing hadronic and leptonic objects in every event into
391: exactly two jets. At least one time of flight measurement
392: has to be consistent with the beam crossing to reject cosmic rays.
393:
394:
395:
396:
397:
398:
399: \section{\boldmath{$\lambda_{ ijk}$} Analysis}
400: \label{par:lambda_anal}
401:
402:
403: Table~\ref{tab:topologies} shows the possible topologies arising
404: when the $\mathrm \lambda_{ijk}$ couplings dominate. The different
405: selections can be classified into four categories as follows:
406: $2 \ell + \Emiss$, $4 \ell + \Emiss$, $6 \ell$,
407: $(\ge 4) \, \ell$ plus possible jets and $\Emiss$. $\Emiss$ (missing energy)
408: indicates final state neutrinos escaping detection.
409: After a common preselection,
410: a dedicated selection is developed for each group, taking
411: into account lepton flavours, particle boosts and
412: virtual W and Z decay products.
413:
414: %\clearpage
415: \begin{table*} [htbp]
416: \begin{center}
417: \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} \hline
418:
419: \multicolumn{1}{|l} {Direct decays}
420: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} { }
421: & Selections \\ \hline
422:
423:
424: % chi01 chi01
425: \multicolumn{1}{|l} {\epem\ra~$\chim\chin \ra$} \rpvpha
426: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} {\hspace{-0.3 cm}{\em $\ell\ell\ell\ell$}$\nu\nu$ }
427: & 4 $\mathrm{\ell}$
428: + $\Emiss$ \\ \hline
429:
430: % cha+ cha- direct Rp decays
431: \multicolumn{1}{|l} { \epem\ra~$\chap\cham \ra$} \rpvpha
432: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} {\em\hspace{-0.3 cm}$\ell\ell\ell\ell\ell\ell$}
433: & 6 $\mathrm{\ell}$ \\
434:
435: \multicolumn{1}{|l} {}
436: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} {{\em\hspace{-0.3 cm}$\ell\ell\ell\ell$}$\nu\nu$}
437: & 4 $\mathrm{\ell}$ + $ \Emiss$ \\
438:
439: \multicolumn{1}{|l} {}
440: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} {{\em\hspace{-0.3 cm}$\ell\ell$}$\nu\nu\nu\nu$ }
441: & 2 $\mathrm{\ell}$ + $ \Emiss$ \\ \hline
442:
443: % slepton direct decays
444: \multicolumn{1}{|l} { \epem\ra~$\slepp\slepm \;\ra$} \rpvpha
445: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} {\hspace{-0.3 cm}$\ell\nu\ell\nu$}
446: & 2 $\mathrm{\ell}$ + $ \Emiss$ \\ \hline
447:
448: % sneutrino direct decays
449: \multicolumn{1}{|l} { \epem\ra~$\snu\snu \hspace{0.5 cm}\ra$} \rpvpha
450: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} {\hspace{-0.3 cm}$\ell\ell\ell\ell$}
451: & 4 $\mathrm{\ell}$ + $ \Emiss$ \\ \hline
452:
453: %
454: %
455: \multicolumn{1}{|l} {Indirect decays}
456: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} { }
457: & \\ \hline
458:
459:
460: % chi0i chi01
461: \multicolumn{1}{|l} { \epem\ra~$\chim\chin_{(n\geq 2)}$} \rpvpha
462: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} {\hspace{-0.4 cm} \ra $\;$ cascades }
463: & $(\ge 4) \, \mathrm{\ell}$ + (jets) + $ \Emiss$ \\ \hline
464:
465: % \multicolumn{1}{|r} { {\scriptsize($n\geq 2$)~~~} }
466: % &\multicolumn{1}{l|} { }
467: % & \\ \hline
468:
469: % cha+ cha-
470: \multicolumn{1}{|l} {\epem\ra~$\chap\cham \ra$ } \rpvpha
471: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} {\hspace{-0.5 cm}
472: $\tilde{\chi}_{1(2)}^0\tilde{\chi}_{1(2)}^0 \Wstar\Wstar$}
473: & $(\ge 4) \, \mathrm{\ell}$ + (jets) + $ \Emiss$ \\ \hline
474:
475: % slepton indirect decays
476: \multicolumn{1}{|l} { \epem\ra~$\slepp\slepm \;\ra$} \rpvpha
477: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} {\hspace{-0.3 cm}$\ell\ell\ell\ell\ell\ell\nu\nu$}
478: & $(\ge 4) \, \mathrm{\ell}$ + (jets) + $ \Emiss$ \\ \hline
479:
480: % sneutrino indirect decays
481: \multicolumn{1}{|l} { \epem\ra~$\snu\snu \hspace{0.5 cm}\ra$} \rpvpha
482: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} {\hspace{-0.3 cm}$\ell\ell\ell\ell\nu\nu\nu\nu$}
483: & 4 $\mathrm{\ell}$ + $\Emiss$ \\ \hline
484:
485:
486:
487: \end{tabular}
488: \caption{Processes considered in the
489: $\mathrm \lambda_{ijk}$ coupling analysis
490: and corresponding selections.
491: $\protect\chim\protect\chin$ indicates neutralino pair-production
492: with $m = 1,2 \,$ and $n = 1,..,4$. ``Cascades'' refers
493: to all possible final state combinations of Table~\ref{tab:decays}.}
494: \label{tab:topologies}
495: \end{center}
496: \end{table*}
497:
498:
499:
500:
501: Events are preselected by requiring at least two charged leptons
502: ($N_{e,\mu,\tau}$), to reject $\mathrm \qqbar$ events and
503: hadronic $\mathrm \WpWm$ and ZZ decays.
504: Events have to contain at least 3 charged tracks ($N_{tracks}$) and
505: 4 calorimetric clusters ($N_{clusters}$) in order to remove
506: $\epem \ra \epem, \mpmm$ and purely leptonic $\mathrm \tautau$
507: and $\mathrm \WpWm$ decays.
508: The visible energy ($E_{vis}$) is required to be
509: less than $90\%$ of $\sqrt s$, in order to reject
510: background from lepton pair-production.
511: If the number of tracks is at least 5,
512: the cut on the visible energy is not applied, otherwise it
513: would suppress signal events with six charged leptons.
514: Back-to-back events, in particular $\mathrm \tautau$, are reduced
515: by requiring ${y_{34}}$ to be greater than 0.0002.
516: For low multiplicity signal events belonging to the
517: $2 \ell + \Emiss$ topologies,
518: the following cuts are applied:
519: events must have at least 2 and less than 6 tracks, between 2 and 15
520: calorimetric clusters, the visible energy has to be
521: less than $60\%$ of $\sqrt s$ and $N_{jets8}$ has to be at least 2.
522: In this case, the preselection
523: requirement on ${y_{34}}$ is not applied. In addition, for the
524: $2 \ell + \Emiss$ topologies, the acollinearity and acoplanarity
525: angles are required to be below $\mathrm 176^\circ$ in order
526: to reject $\ell^+\ell^-$ background.
527:
528:
529:
530: Untagged two-photon interactions are removed by requiring
531: the visible energy to be greater than $20\%$ of $\rts$.
532: The polar angle ($\theta_{miss}$) of the missing momentum vector
533: has to be between $\mathrm 15^\circ$ and $\mathrm 165^\circ$.
534: Background from two-photon interactions is further reduced
535: by requiring the missing transverse momentum ($p^T_{miss}$)
536: to be greater than 7 \GeV.
537: Tagged two-photon interactions are rejected by requiring the sum
538: of the energies measured in the small angle calorimeters
539: between $\mathrm 1.5^\circ$ and $\mathrm 9.0^\circ$
540: to be less than 10 \GeV.
541:
542:
543: After the preselection is applied,
544: 995 events are selected in the data sample and $984 \pm 6$ events
545: are expected from Standard Model processes, of which 398 are
546: from $\mathrm \WpWm$, 136 from $\mathrm{W^\pm\, e^\mp \nu}$ decays
547: and 258 from $\qqbar$ events.
548: Figure \ref{fig:ps_lambda} shows the
549: number of leptons, acollinearity, normalised visible
550: energy and ln(${y_{34}}$) distributions after the
551: preselection.
552: The data are in good agreement with the Monte Carlo expectations.
553:
554: The four groups of final selections are shown in
555: Tables~\ref{tab:lambda_sel1} to~\ref{tab:lambda_sel3b} of
556: Appendix~\ref{par:appendix_sel}.
557: The efficiencies are summarized in Tables~\ref{tab:efficiencies1} and
558: ~\ref{tab:efficiencies2}.
559: Here and in the following sections we discuss only the results obtained
560: for those choices of the generation indices which give the
561: lowest selection efficiencies. In this way, the quoted results
562: will be conservatively valid for any ${ijk}$ combination.
563: In the case of direct R-parity violating decays, the efficiencies
564: are estimated for different mass values of the pair-produced
565: supersymmetric particles. In the case of indirect decays,
566: the efficiencies are estimated for different masses and $\DM$ ranges.
567: $\DM$ is defined as the mass difference $M_{susy} - \mchi$, where
568: $M_{susy}$ can assume different values according to the type of
569: supersymmetric particle whose decay is considered.
570:
571: In the case of direct neutralino or chargino decays,
572: the lowest efficiencies are found for $\lambda_{ijk} = \lamtre$,
573: due to the presence of taus in the final state.
574: The efficiencies increase with the neutralino or chargino mass.
575: At high masses (greater than 50 \GeV{}),
576: six fermions are expected to be isotropically produced
577: and can be disentangled from W pair-production background events.
578: For low masses, the signal signatures look like
579: back-to-back jet events and the selection efficiencies are smaller due
580: to cuts to reduce the dominant background coming from the two-fermion processes.
581: In addition, the efficiencies obtained for low masses
582: are higher for charginos than for neutralinos
583: due to the contribution of the six charged lepton final state.
584:
585: For indirect chargino decays and for a chargino mass of 94 \GeV,
586: the efficiencies decrease with increasing $\DM$.
587: At high $\DM$, the signal signatures are
588: very similar to those of W pair-production.
589: For $\mchim + \mchin = $ 188 \GeV,
590: the efficiencies of the process $\epem \ra \mathrm \chim \chin \;$
591: ($m = 1,2$, $\, n = 2,3,4$) decrease slightly with increasing $\DM$.
592:
593:
594: In the case of pair-production of scalar charged leptons, followed
595: by direct decays via $\lambda_{ijk}$, the final state contains
596: two leptons plus missing energy. The lepton flavours are given
597: by the indices $i$ and $j$, independently of the value of $k$,
598: as shown in Table~\ref{tab:decays}.
599: The lowest selection efficiency is found for $\lambda_{ijk} = \lambda_{12k}$,
600: {\it i.e.} for events with electrons and/or muons in the final state.
601: This is due to the fact that
602: it is necessary, in order to reject a potential large background from
603: lepton pair-production, to select events with
604: at least 3 calorimetric clusters and with visible
605: energy below 55\% of $\rts$ (Table~\ref{tab:lambda_sel2}). For this reason,
606: events with lower multiplicity coming from $\lambda_{12k}$ mediated decays are
607: selected with lower efficiency. The efficiency increases with increasing
608: scalar lepton mass.
609:
610: Direct decays of scalar neutrinos provide four leptons in the final state.
611: In this case we have used the
612: $4 \ell + \Emiss$ and $(\ge 4) \, \ell + $ (jets) $ + \Emiss$
613: selections, without developing a dedicated one, since these
614: selections provide, also for $4 \ell$ events, a good analysis sensitivity
615: comparable to that of the dedicated selections
616: for scalar electrons, muons and taus.
617: Events with scalar neutrino decays into electrons
618: and muons are thus selected with lower efficiency than events with decays
619: into taus. In particular, the smallest efficiency is obtained for
620: $\lambda_{121}$, which can give rise to the decays
621: $\mathrm{\snu_e \ra \mu^- e^+\,}$ and $\mathrm{\snu_\mu \ra e^- e^+}$.
622: This effect is
623: due to the selection requirements on the energy in the electromagnetic
624: calorimeter, which are optimized for selecting events with
625: $4 \ell + \Emiss$.
626:
627: Indirect decays of charged scalar leptons ($\slepp\slepm \ra
628: \ell^+ \ell^- \chio\chio$)
629: provide six leptons plus missing energy in the final state.
630: The events are selected by means of the
631: $(\ge 4) \, \ell + $ (jets) $ + \Emiss$ selections.
632: Table~\ref{tab:efficiencies2} shows the efficiencies for scalar
633: electron, muon and tau pair-production, for different values of
634: $\DM = M_{\slepr} - \mchi$.
635: For large values of $\DM$ the selection efficiencies are smaller
636: for $\serp\serm$ than for the other channels because of the cut on
637: the energy in the electromagnetic calorimeter.
638:
639: Indirect decays of scalar neutrinos ($\snu\snu \ra \nu\nu \chio\chio$)
640: are selected by the $4 \ell + \Emiss$ selections. The efficiency
641: decreases with increasing $\DM$, when the two additional neutrinos
642: can carry a relevant fraction of the total energy.
643:
644: %\clearpage
645: \vspace{1 cm}
646: \begin{table*} [htbp]
647: \begin{center}
648: \begin{tabular}{|l|l|c|c|c|} \hline
649: \multicolumn{2}{|c|} {Direct decays }
650: &\multicolumn{3}{c|} {Mass values } \\ \hline
651: Coupling & Process & $M =$ 5--20 \GeV & $M =$ 25--50 \GeV & $M $=55--94
652: \GeV \\ \hline
653: $ \lambda_{133}$ & $\chim\chin$ \rpvpha & 4\%--13\% & 21\%--35\% & 41\%--51\% \\ \hline
654: $ \lambda_{133} $ & $\chap\cham$ \rpvpha & 8\%--10\% & 15\%--36\% & 43\%--45\% \\ \hline
655: $ \lambda'_{311}$ & $\chim\chin$, $\chap\cham$ \rpvpha & 6\%--17\% & 19\%--28\% & 21\%--26\% \\ \hline
656: $ \lambda''_{212}$ & $\chim\chin$, $\chap\cham$ \rpvpha & -- & 29\%--38\% & 35\%--54\% \\ \hline
657:
658: \multicolumn{2}{|c|} {Indirect decays }
659: &\multicolumn{3}{c|} {$\DM$ values } \\ \hline
660: Coupling & Process & ${\DM}=$ 5--20 \GeV & ${\DM}=$ 25--50 \GeV &
661: ${\DM}=$ 55--80 \GeV \\ \hline
662: $ \lambda_{133}$ & $\chim\chin_{(n\geq 2)}$ \rpvpha
663: & 50\%--51\% & 48\%--50\% & 42\%--46\% \\ \hline
664: $ \lambda_{133}$ & $\chap\cham$ \rpvpha & 47\%--59\% & 33\%--43\% & 14\%--27\% \\ \hline
665: $ \lambda'_{311}$ & $\chap\cham$ \rpvpha & 25\%--28\% & 29\%--30\% & 17\%--23\% \\ \hline
666: $ \lambda''_{212}$ & $\chim\chin_{(n\geq 2)}$ \rpvpha
667: & 55\%--59\% & 59\%--60\% & 47\%--53\% \\ \hline
668: $ \lambda''_{212}$ & $\chap\cham$ \rpvpha & 54\%--62\% & 60\%--66\% & 43\%--56\% \\ \hline
669:
670: \end{tabular}
671: \caption{Efficiency ranges for neutralino and chargino production.
672: $\protect\chim\protect\chin$ indicates neutralino pair-production
673: with $m = 1,2 \,$ and $n = 1,..,4$. The efficiencies correspond to
674: $ \protect\mchim + \protect\mchin = $ 188 \GeV. For
675: direct decays the lowest mass values considered are $\protect\mchi = 5$ \gev{}
676: and $\protect\mcha = 15$ \GeV{}
677: for $\lamtre$, $M =$ 15 \gev{} for $ \lambda'_{311}$ and
678: $\protect\mchi = 20$ \gev{} and $\protect\mcha =$ 45 \GeV{} for $\lamuno$.
679: For direct neutralino decays
680: we quote the $\protect\chio\protect\chio$ efficiencies.
681: In the case of indirect decays
682: the chargino selection efficiencies correspond to $\protect\mcha =$ 94 \GeV.}
683: \label{tab:efficiencies1}
684: \end{center}
685: \end{table*}
686:
687: %\clearpage
688: \begin{table*} [htbp]
689: \begin{center}
690: \begin{tabular}{|l|l|c|c|c|} \hline
691: \multicolumn{2}{|c|} {Direct decays }
692: &\multicolumn{3}{c|} {Mass values } \\ \hline
693: Coupling & Process & $M =$ 5--20 \GeV & $M =$ 25--50 \GeV & $M $=55--94
694: \GeV \\ \hline
695: $ \lambda_{12k} $ & $\slepp\slepm$ \rpvpha & -- & -- & 8\%--18\% \\ \hline
696: $ \lambda_{121}$ & $\snu\snu$ \rpvpha & -- & -- & 6\%--8\% \\ \hline
697: %
698: $ \lambda'_{311}$ & $\serp\serm\;$ * \rpvpha & -- & 14\%--16\% & 18\%--22\% \\ \hline
699: $ \lambda''_{212}$ & $\serp\serm \;$ * \rpvpha & -- & 32\%--38\% & 35\%--54\% \\ \hline
700: $ \lambda''_{212}$ & $\smurp\smurm$ * \rpvpha & -- & 32\%--38\% & 35\%--54\% \\ \hline
701: $ \lambda''_{212}$ & $\staurp\staurm\,$ * \rpvpha & -- & 32\%--38\% & 15\%--44\% \\ \hline
702:
703: \multicolumn{2}{|c|} {Indirect decays }
704: &\multicolumn{3}{c|} {$\DM$ values } \\ \hline
705: Coupling & Process & ${\DM}=$ 5--20 \GeV & ${\DM}=$ 25--50 \GeV &
706: ${\DM}=$ 55--80 \GeV \\ \hline
707:
708: $ \lambda_{133}$ & $\serp\serm$ \rpvpha & 74\%--74\% & 50\%--63\% & 26\%--38\% \\ \hline
709: $ \lambda_{133}$ & $\smurp\smurm$ \rpvpha & 82\%--84\% & 76\%--84\% & 65\%--72\% \\ \hline
710: $ \lambda_{133}$ & $\staurp\staurm$ \rpvpha& 66\%--72\% & 67\%--73\% & 57\%--65\% \\ \hline
711: $ \lambda_{133}$ & $\snu\snu$ \rpvpha & 52\%--52\% & 39\%--49\% & 28\%--37\% \\ \hline
712: $ \lambda'_{311}$ & $\serp\serm$ \rpvpha & 30\%--60\% & 50\%--60\% &
713: 60\%--76\% \\ \hline
714: $ \lambda''_{212}$ & $\serp\serm$ \rpvpha & 37\%--63\% & 66\%--69\% &
715: 45\%--62\% \\ \hline
716: $ \lambda''_{212}$ & $\smurp\smurm$ \rpvpha & 29\%--51\% & 54\%--57\% &
717: 34\%--50\% \\ \hline
718: $ \lambda''_{212}$ & $\staurp\staurm$ \rpvpha & 56\%--66\% & 39\%--62\% &
719: 15\%--16\% \\ \hline
720:
721: \end{tabular}
722: \caption{Efficiency ranges for scalar lepton production.
723: In the case of direct decays the lowest mass value considered
724: is $M_{\slepr} = 54$ \GeV{}
725: for $\lambda_{12k}$, $M_{\snu} = 54$ \GeV{} for $\lambda_{121}$,
726: $M_{\ser} = 45$ \GeV{} for $\lambda'_{311}$ and
727: $M_{\slepr} = 30$ \GeV{} for $\lambda''_{212}$.
728: For the processes marked with~* we refer to four-body decays, as
729: described in Sections~\ref{par:lambdapri_anal}
730: and~\ref{par:lambdasec_anal}.
731: For indirect decays
732: the scalar lepton selection efficiencies correspond to
733: $M_{\slepr} \,(M_{\snu}) \, =$ 94 \GeV.}
734: \label{tab:efficiencies2}
735: \end{center}
736: \end{table*}
737:
738:
739: \newpage
740: \section{\boldmath{$\lambda'_{ ijk}$} Analysis}
741: \label{par:lambdapri_anal}
742:
743: Table~\ref{tab:topologies_lqd} shows the topologies arising
744: when the $\mathrm \lambda'_{ijk}$ couplings dominate, as well as the
745: different final states, classified into five categories.
746: The quark flavour composition is given by the
747: {\it j} and {\it k} generation indices of the dominant
748: $\lambda'_{ijk}$ coupling.
749: After a common preselection, a dedicated selection is developed
750: for each group, taking into account lepton flavours and charge,
751: particle boosts and virtual Z and W decay products.
752:
753: %\clearpage
754: \begin{table*} [htbp]
755: \begin{center}
756: \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} \hline
757:
758: \multicolumn{1}{|l} {Direct decays}
759: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} { }
760: & Selections \\ \hline
761:
762: % chi0n chi0m
763: \multicolumn{1}{|l} {\epem\ra~$\chim\chin \;\ra$} \rpvpha
764: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} {\hspace{-0.3 cm}{\rm qqqq $\ell\ell$}}
765: & 4 jets + 2 $\ell$ \\
766: \multicolumn{1}{|l} { }
767: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} {\hspace{-0.3 cm}{\rm qqqq $\ell\nu$}}
768: & 4 jets + $\ell$ + $\Emiss$ \\
769: \multicolumn{1}{|l} { }
770: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} {\hspace{-0.3 cm}{\rm qqqq $\nu\nu$}}
771: & 4 jets + $\Emiss$ \\ \hline
772:
773: % cha+ cha- direct Rp decays
774: \multicolumn{1}{|l} {\epem\ra~$\chap\cham \;\ra$} \rpvpha
775: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} {\hspace{-0.3 cm}{\rm qqqq $\,\ell\ell$}}
776: & 4 jets + 2 $\ell$ \\
777: \multicolumn{1}{|l} { }
778: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} {\hspace{-0.3 cm}{\rm qqqq $\,\ell\nu$}}
779: & 4 jets + $\ell$ + $\Emiss$ \\
780: \multicolumn{1}{|l} { }
781: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} {\hspace{-0.3 cm}{\rm qqqq $\,\nu\nu$}}
782: & 4 jets + $\Emiss$ \\ \hline
783:
784: %
785: %
786: \multicolumn{1}{|l} {Indirect decays}
787: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} { }
788: & \\ \hline
789:
790: % chi0i chi01
791: \multicolumn{1}{|l} { \epem\ra~$\chim\chin_{(n\geq 2)}$} \rpvpha
792: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} {\hspace{-0.4 cm} \ra $\;$ cascades }
793: & multijets (+ leptons) (+ $\Emiss$) \\ \hline
794:
795: % cha+ cha-
796: \multicolumn{1}{|l} {\epem\ra~$\chap\cham \ra$ } \rpvpha
797: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} {\hspace{-0.5 cm}
798: $\tilde{\chi}_{1(2)}^0\tilde{\chi}_{1(2)}^0 \Wstar\Wstar$}
799: & multijets (+ leptons) (+ $\Emiss$) \\ \hline
800:
801: % slepton indirect decays
802: \multicolumn{1}{|l} { \epem\ra~$\serp\serm \;\ra$}
803: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} {\hspace{-0.3 cm}$\chio\chio$ ee } \rpvpha
804: & 4 jets + 2--4 $\mathrm{\ell}$ (+ $\Emiss$) \\ \hline
805:
806:
807: \end{tabular}
808: \caption{Processes considered in the
809: $\mathrm \lambda'_{ijk}$ coupling analysis and corresponding
810: selections. For masses below 50~\gev{}
811: or small $\DM$ values not all jets in the event can be resolved.
812: $\protect\chim\protect\chin$ indicates neutralino pair-production
813: with $m = 1,2 \,$ and $n = 1,..,4$. ``Cascades'' refers
814: to all possible final state combinations of Table~\ref{tab:decays}.}
815: \label{tab:topologies_lqd}
816: \end{center}
817: \end{table*}
818:
819:
820:
821:
822: Events are preselected by requiring at least 4 charged tracks
823: and 5 calorimetric clusters in order to remove
824: $\epem \ra \epem, \mpmm$ and purely leptonic $\mathrm \tautau$
825: and $\mathrm \WpWm$ decays.
826: For centre-of-mass energies
827: above the Z peak a large fraction of background events contains a
828: hard initial state radiation (ISR) photon. In order to remove
829: these events the polar angle of the missing momentum has to be
830: between $\mathrm 7^\circ$ and $\mathrm 173^\circ$.
831:
832: Untagged two-photon interactions are removed by requiring
833: the energy in a cone of $\mathrm 12^\circ$ half-opening angle around the
834: beam axis not to exceed 20\% of the total visible energy.
835: In addition, the visible energy must be greater than $30\%$ of
836: $\rts$.
837: Tagged two-photon interactions are rejected as explained in
838: Section~\ref{par:lambda_anal}.
839:
840:
841:
842: In this analysis no attempt is made to identify quark flavours.
843: However, the efficiency is found to be slightly higher for
844: events containing b quarks than for events with light quarks.
845: When $i = 3$, the decay products
846: of the neutralino pair contain $\tautau$, $\tau \nu_\tau$
847: or $ \nu_\tau \bar\nu_\tau$. Since taus are selected with
848: lower efficiency with respect to electrons or muons,
849: this choice of the first generation index provides a conservative
850: estimate for the signal efficiency.
851: The lowest selection efficiency is thus found for
852: the choice $\lambda'_{ijk} = \lambda'_{311}$,
853: that will be quoted in the following.
854:
855: After the preselection is applied,
856: 11099 events are selected in the data sample and
857: $11022 \pm 34$ events are expected from Standard Model processes,
858: of which 7677 events are from $\mathrm \qqbar$, 2481
859: from $\mathrm \WpWm$ decays and 674 from
860: hadronic two-photon interactions.
861: Figure \ref{fig:ps_lambdaprime} shows the ln(${y_{34}}$),
862: thrust, normalised visible
863: energy and polar angle of the missing momentum
864: distributions after the preselection.
865: The data are in good agreement with the Monte Carlo expectations.
866:
867: The five groups of final selections are shown in
868: Tables~\ref{tab:lambdaprime_sel1} to~\ref{tab:lambdaprime_sel7} of
869: Appendix~\ref{par:appendix_sel}.
870: The lowest selection efficiencies correspond to
871: $\lambda'_{ijk} = \lambda'_{311}$, and are summarized in
872: Tables~\ref{tab:efficiencies1} and~\ref{tab:efficiencies2}.
873:
874: In the case of neutralino and chargino direct decays
875: the lowest selection efficiency is obtained
876: in the intermediate mass region (for mass values around 50 \gev)
877: where the $\mathrm \WpWm $ background
878: can not be efficiently rejected by a cut on the thrust.
879:
880: For indirect chargino decays and for a chargino mass of 94 \GeV{}
881: the efficiencies decrease for high values of $\DM$, since
882: in this region the signal signatures are
883: very similar to those of W pair-production.
884:
885: In the case of dominant $\lambda'_{ijk}$ couplings,
886: scalar leptons can decay indirectly:
887: $\slepr \ra \ell \, \chio \ra \ell \ell$qq, $\, \ell \nu$qq.
888: The efficiencies for indirect decays are listed in
889: Table~\ref{tab:efficiencies2}.
890: Only $\serp\serm$ production is considered. The efficiency is highest for large $\DM$, when
891: the two energetic electrons give a clear signature.
892:
893: Supersymmetric partners of the right-handed leptons have no direct
894: two-body decays via $\lambda'_{ijk}$ couplings (Table~\ref{tab:decays}).
895: However, when scalar leptons are lighter than $\chio$,
896: the four-body~\cite{superp2} decay $\slepr \ra \ell \ell$qq
897: or $\slepr \ra \ell \nu$qq can occur.
898: This leads to the same final states as those resulting from $\slepr$ indirect
899: decays, but with virtual $\chio$ production.
900: Since non-resonant four-body decays are not implemented in the
901: generator~\cite{susygen}, we have used the
902: results of the indirect decay analysis, with a procedure analogous
903: to the one described at the end of Section~\ref{par:lambdasec_anal}.
904:
905:
906: \section{\boldmath{$\lambda''_{ ijk}$} Analysis}
907: \label{par:lambdasec_anal}
908:
909: Table~\ref{tab:topologies_udd} shows the topologies arising
910: when the $\mathrm \lambda''_{ijk}$ couplings dominate.
911: The flavour composition depends on the generation indices.
912: In the case of neutralino and chargino pair-production,
913: the different topologies can be classified into two groups:
914: multijets and multijets with leptons and/or missing energy.
915: After a common preselection, dedicated selections are
916: developed for each group, depending on the particle boosts,
917: the $\DM$ values and the
918: virtual W decay products.
919: The following process is
920: also considered: $\epem\ra \slepp\slepm \ra {\rm qqqqqq} \ell^+\ell^-$,
921: for which a third group of selections is performed, taking
922: into account the lepton flavour.
923:
924: %\clearpage
925: \begin{table*} [htbp]
926: \begin{center}
927: \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} \hline
928:
929: \multicolumn{1}{|l} {Direct decays}
930: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} { }
931: & Selections \\ \hline
932:
933: % chi01 chi01
934: \multicolumn{1}{|l} {\epem\ra~$\chim\chin \;\ra$} \rpvpha
935: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} {\hspace{-0.3 cm}{\rm qqqqqq}}
936: & multijets \\ \hline
937:
938: % cha+ cha- direct Rp decays
939: \multicolumn{1}{|l} { \epem\ra~$\chap\cham \ra$} \rpvpha
940: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} {\hspace{-0.3 cm}{\rm qqqqqq}}
941: & multijets \\ \hline
942:
943: %
944: %
945: \multicolumn{1}{|l} {Indirect decays}
946: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} { }
947: & \\ \hline
948:
949:
950: % chi0i chi01
951: \multicolumn{1}{|l} { \epem\ra~$\chim\chin_{(n\geq 2)} \ra$} \rpvpha
952: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} {\hspace{-0.3 cm}{\rm qqqqqq qq}}
953: & multijets \\
954:
955: \multicolumn{1}{|l} { }
956: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} {\hspace{-0.3 cm}{\rm qqqqqq $\ell\ell$}}
957: % & 6 jets + 2 $\ell$ \\
958: & multijets + lepton(s) \\
959:
960: \multicolumn{1}{|l} { }
961: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} {\hspace{-0.3 cm}{\rm qqqqqq $\nu\nu$}}
962: % & multijets + $ \Emiss$ \\ \hline
963: & multijets \\ \hline
964:
965: % cha+ cha-
966: \multicolumn{1}{|l} {\epem\ra~$\chap\cham \ra$ } \rpvpha
967: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} {\hspace{-0.5 cm}{qqqqqq qqqq}}
968: & multijets \\
969:
970: \multicolumn{1}{|l} { }
971: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} {\hspace{-0.5 cm}{qqqqqq qq $\ell\nu$}}
972: % & 8 jets + $\ell$ + $\Emiss$ \\
973: & multijets + lepton(s) \\
974:
975: \multicolumn{1}{|l} { }
976: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} {\hspace{-0.5 cm}{qqqqqq $\ell\ell\nu\nu$}}
977: % & 6 jets + 2 $\ell$ + $ \Emiss$ \\ \hline
978: & multijets + lepton(s) \\ \hline
979:
980: % slepton indirect decays
981: \multicolumn{1}{|l} { \epem\ra~$\slepp\slepm \;\ra$} \rpvpha
982: &\multicolumn{1}{l|} {\hspace{-0.6 cm} qqqqqq $\ell\ell $}
983: & 6 jets + 2 $\mathrm{\ell}$ \\ \hline
984:
985:
986: \end{tabular}
987: \caption{Processes considered in the
988: $\mathrm \lambda''_{ijk}$ coupling analysis and corresponding
989: selections. For masses below 50~\gev{}
990: or small $\DM$ values not all jets in the event can be resolved.
991: $\chim\protect\chin$ indicates neutralino pair-production
992: with $m = 1,2 \,$ and $n = 1,..,4$.
993: For final states with neutrinos we use selections with no explicit
994: missing energy requirement, because for those topologies $\Emiss$
995: is small.}
996: \label{tab:topologies_udd}
997: \end{center}
998: \end{table*}
999:
1000:
1001:
1002:
1003: The preselection of the $\mathrm \lambda''_{ijk}$
1004: analysis aims at selecting well balanced hadronic events.
1005: Low multiplicity events, such as leptonic Z and W decays, are
1006: rejected by requiring at least 13 calorimetric clusters.
1007: At least one charged track has to be present.
1008: The visible energy has to be greater than 70\% of $\sqrt s$.
1009: The energy imbalances, parallel ($E_{par}$) and perpendicular
1010: ($E_{perp}$) to the beam direction, are required to be less
1011: than 20\% of the visible energy.
1012: Unbalanced events
1013: with an ISR photon in the beam pipe are removed by means of
1014: the requirement on the parallel energy imbalance.
1015: In order to reject events with an ISR photon seen in the
1016: detector, the invariant mass of the hadronic system ($\rtsp$) has to
1017: be greater than 80\% of $\rts$.
1018: In order to remove background contributions from two-photon interactions,
1019: the energy in a cone of $\mathrm 12^\circ$ half-opening angle around the
1020: beam axis has not to exceed 30\% of the total visible energy.
1021: Furthermore, the thrust axis is required to be well contained in the
1022: detector with a polar angle ($\theta_T$) between $\mathrm 8^\circ$
1023: and $\mathrm 172^\circ$.
1024:
1025: Also in this analysis no attempt is made to identify quark flavours.
1026: However, the efficiency is found to be slightly lower for events containing
1027: light quarks than for events with b quarks.
1028: Therefore, only the results obtained by the
1029: choice $\mathrm \lambda''_{ijk} = \lamuno$ will be quoted
1030: in the next sections.
1031: After the preselection is applied,
1032: 5492 events are selected in the data sample and $5463 \pm 32$
1033: are expected from Standard Model processes,
1034: of which 3803 are $\mathrm \qqbar$ and 1431 are
1035: $\mathrm \WpWm$ events.
1036: Figure~\ref{fig:ps_lambdasec} shows the
1037: ln($y_{34}$), thrust, ln($y_{45}$)
1038: and width of the most energetic jet ($W_{jet1}$)
1039: distributions after the preselection.
1040: The width of a jet is defined as $ {p}_{T}^{jet} / {E^{jet}_{ }}$,
1041: where the event is clustered into exactly two jets,
1042: ordered with decreasing energies,
1043: and ${p}_{T}^{jet}$ is the sum of the projections of the particle
1044: momenta
1045: on to a plane perpendicular to the jet axis.
1046: There is good agreement between data and Monte Carlo expectations.
1047:
1048: The three groups of final selections are shown in
1049: Tables~\ref{tab:lambdasec_sel1} to~\ref{tab:lambdasec_sel3} of
1050: Appendix~\ref{par:appendix_sel}.
1051: The efficiencies are summarized in Tables~\ref{tab:efficiencies1}
1052: and~\ref{tab:efficiencies2}.
1053:
1054: For direct neutralino and chargino decays, the efficiencies increase
1055: with increasing mass of the supersymmetric particle.
1056: At high masses, the six quarks are expected to be isotropically produced,
1057: while for low mass values signal events are produced back-to-back
1058: and are selected with lower efficiencies due to cuts required to reduce
1059: the dominant background coming from the two-fermion processes.
1060:
1061: In the case of indirect decays and for a chargino mass of 94 \GeV{}
1062: the efficiencies slightly decrease at high values of $\DM$, where
1063: the signal signatures are very similar to those of $\WpWm$ background.
1064: Leptons and neutrinos from
1065: virtual W decays
1066: can carry a large fraction of the event energy when $\DM$ is large,
1067: leading to lower selection efficiencies.
1068:
1069: For $\mchim + \mchin = $ 188 \GeV,
1070: the efficiencies of the process $\epem \ra \mathrm \chim \chin \;$
1071: ($m = 1,2$, $\, n = 2,3,4$) decrease slightly with increasing $\DM$.
1072:
1073:
1074: Scalar leptons can decay indirectly:
1075: $\slepr \ra \ell \, \chio \ra \ell$qqq.
1076: The efficiencies for these indirect decays are also listed in
1077: Table~\ref{tab:efficiencies2}.
1078:
1079: For scalar electron and scalar muon decays,
1080: the efficiencies are highest for medium $\DM = M_{\slepr} - \mchi$
1081: values, where events have a high multiplicity satisfying the multijet
1082: selections and two energetic leptons which are well identified.
1083:
1084: Supersymmetric partners of the right-handed leptons have no direct
1085: two-body decays via $\lambda''_{ijk}$ couplings (Table~\ref{tab:decays}).
1086: However, when scalar leptons are lighter than $\chio$,
1087: the four-body~\cite{superp2} decay $\slepr \ra \ell$qqq can occur and
1088: this provides the same final state $\ell$qqq as that resulting from indirect
1089: decays, but with virtual $\chio$ production.
1090:
1091: The non-resonant four-body decay is not implemented in the
1092: generator, which allows only scalar lepton decays via
1093: on-shell neutralino production. For this reason, we use the
1094: results of the indirect decay analysis, performing a scan
1095: over all neutralino mass values between 0
1096: and $M_{\slepr}$, for each value of $M_{\slepr}$.
1097: The resulting lowest efficiency is conservatively quoted
1098: in the following for
1099: four-body decays. It is found in most cases for $\mchi \simeq M_{\slepr}$,
1100: that the resulting low energy lepton can not be separated from a nearby
1101: jet.
1102: For scalar taus with masses above 70~\gev{}
1103: the lowest efficiency is found for high $\DM$ values, as in the case
1104: of indirect decays.
1105:
1106:
1107:
1108:
1109:
1110:
1111:
1112: \section{Model Independent Results}
1113: \label{par:mod_ind_results}
1114:
1115: Table~\ref{tab:tab7} and Table~\ref{tab:tab8} show the number of
1116: candidates and expected background events for the different
1117: selections and processes, respectively.
1118: The same process may give rise to different final states
1119: (such as chargino direct decays via $\lambda_{ijk}$) or the
1120: same final state (like ``multijets'') can be present as a decay
1121: product of more than one process.
1122:
1123: No excess of events is observed.
1124: Therefore upper limits are set on the neutralino, chargino
1125: and scalar lepton production cross
1126: sections assuming direct or indirect R-parity violating decays.
1127: Figure~\ref{fig:cross_sec1} shows the 95\% confidence level
1128: (C.L.) upper limits on neutralino and chargino pair-production
1129: cross~sections. The 95\% C.L.
1130: upper limits on scalar lepton pair-production cross~sections are shown in
1131: Figures~\ref{fig:cross_sec2} and ~\ref{fig:cross_sec3}.
1132: %
1133: %
1134: %
1135: %
1136: These limits are derived by taking into account the estimated
1137: background contamination.
1138: Systematic uncertainties on the signal efficiency
1139: are dominated by Monte Carlo statistics.
1140: The typical relative error is 5\% and it is taken into account in the
1141: calculations of the signal upper limits~\cite{upperlimit}.
1142:
1143: %\clearpage
1144: \begin{table*} [htbp]
1145: \begin{center}
1146: \begin{tabular}{|l|l|c|r|} \hline
1147:
1148: Coupling & Selection & $ N_{back} $ & $ N_{data} $ \\ \hline
1149: $ \lambda_{ijk}$ & $4\ell + \Emiss$ & 2.0 $\pm$ 0.2 & 3 \\ \cline{2-4}
1150: & $(\geq 4) \,\ell +$ (jets) $+ \Emiss \,$ & 3.8 $\pm$ 0.3 & 2 \\ \cline{2-4}
1151: & $2\ell + \Emiss$ & 18 $\pm$ 1 \phoescl & 18 \\ \cline{2-4}
1152: & $6\ell$ & 0.26 $\pm$ 0.05 & 0 \\ \hline
1153:
1154: $ \lambda'_{ijk}$ & 4 jets $ +\, 2 \tau$ & 30.0 $\pm$ 0.7\phoescl\phoescl & 26 \\ \cline{2-4}
1155: & 4 jets $ + \,\Emiss$ & 28.9 $\pm$ 0.8\phoescl\phoescl & 31 \\ \cline{2-4}
1156: & 4 jets + $\tau$ + $\Emiss$ & 29.4 $\pm$ 1.2\phoescl\phoescl & 25 \\ \cline{2-4}
1157: & Multijets + lepton(s) & 6.1 $\pm$ 0.2 & 8 \\ \cline{2-4}
1158: & Multijets + $\Emiss$ & 65 $\pm$ 1\phoescl & 68 \\ \cline{2-4}
1159: & Multijets + lepton(s) + $\Emiss$ & 11.7 $\pm$ 0.2\phoescl\phoescl & 10 \\ \cline{2-4}
1160: & Multijets & 194 $\pm$ 1 \phouno & 187 \\ \cline{2-4}
1161: & Scalar leptons & 26.4 $\pm$ 0.6\pho & 27 \\ \hline
1162:
1163:
1164: $ \lambda''_{ijk}$ & Multijets ($\mchi = $ 20--30 \gev) & 47 $\pm$ 1\phoescl\phoescl & 42 \\\cline{2-4}
1165: & Multijets ($\mchi = $ 30--40 \gev) & 79 $\pm$ 1\phoescl\phoescl & 81 \\\cline{2-4}
1166: & Multijets ($\mchi = $ 40--50 \gev) & 48.1 $\pm$ 0.9 \phoescl & 47 \\\cline{2-4}
1167: & Multijets ($\mchi = $ 50--60 \gev) & 98 $\pm$ 1 \phoescl & 100 \\\cline{2-4}
1168: & Multijets & 194 $\pm$ 1 \phouno & 187 \\\cline{2-4}
1169: & Multijets + lepton(s) (Semileptonic) & 1.6 $\pm$ 0.2 & 3 \\\cline{2-4}
1170: & Multijets + lepton(s) (Leptonic) & 3.2 $\pm$ 0.1 & 3 \\ \cline{2-4}
1171: & Scalar leptons & 154 $\pm$ 1 \phouno & 157 \\ \hline
1172:
1173:
1174: \end{tabular}
1175: \caption{Number of observed data ($N_{data}$) and expected background
1176: ($N_{back}$) events for the different selections.
1177: A process can give rise
1178: to several topologies, or the same topology may occur in
1179: more than one final state.
1180: The error on the expected background is due to Monte Carlo statistics.}
1181: \label{tab:tab7}
1182: \end{center}
1183: %\end{table*}
1184: %
1185: %\begin{table*} [htbp]
1186: %\vspace{0.4 cm}
1187: \begin{center}
1188: \begin{tabular}{|l|l|c|r|} \hline
1189: Coupling & Process & $N_{back}$ & $N_{data}$ \\ \hline
1190: $ \lambda_{ijk}$ & $\chio\chio$ \rpvpha & 2.0 $\pm$ 0.2 & 3 \\ \cline{2-4}
1191: & $\chim\chin$ \rpvpha & 5.8 $\pm$ 0.4 & 5 \\ \cline{2-4}
1192: & $\chap\cham$ (indirect) \rpvpha & 3.8 $\pm$ 0.3 & 2 \\ \cline{2-4}
1193: & $\chap\cham$ (direct) \rpvpha & 20 $\pm$ 1\phoescl & 21 \\ \cline{2-4}
1194: & $\slepp\slepm$ (direct) \rpvpha & 18 $\pm$ 1\phoescl & 18 \\ \cline{2-4}
1195: & $\snu\snu$ \rpvpha & 5.8 $\pm$ 0.4 & 5 \\ \hline
1196: $ \lambda'_{ijk}$ & $\chio\chio$ \rpvpha & 77 $\pm$ 2\phoescl & 70 \\ \cline{2-4}
1197: & $\chap\cham$ \rpvpha & 262 $\pm$ 2 \phoescl\phoescl& 257 \\ \cline{2-4}
1198: & $\serp\serm$ \rpvpha & 26.4 $\pm$ 0.6\phoescl & 27 \\ \hline
1199: $ \lambda''_{ijk}$ & $\chio\chio$ \rpvpha & 357 $\pm$ 3\phouno\phoescl & 353 \\ \cline{2-4}
1200: & $\chap\cham$ \rpvpha & 197 $\pm$ 1\phouno\phoescl & 193 \\ \cline{2-4}
1201: & $\slepp\slepm$\rpvpha& 154 $\pm$ 1\phouno\phoescl & 157 \\ \hline
1202: \end{tabular}
1203: \caption{Number of observed data ($N_{data}$) and expected background
1204: ($N_{back}$) events for the different processes.
1205: Details on the selection of each topology are given in
1206: Table~\ref{tab:tab7}. The error on the
1207: expected background is due to Monte Carlo statistics.}
1208: \label{tab:tab8}
1209: \end{center}
1210: \end{table*}
1211:
1212:
1213:
1214:
1215:
1216:
1217: \section{Interpretation in the MSSM}
1218: \label{par:MSSM}
1219:
1220: The results are also interpreted as excluded
1221: regions in the MSSM parameter space. In
1222: the MSSM framework, neutralino and chargino masses, couplings and
1223: cross sections depend on the gaugino mass parameter, ${M_2}$,
1224: the higgsino mass mixing parameter, $\mu $, the ratio
1225: of the vacuum expectation values of the two Higgs doublets, $\tan\beta$, and
1226: the common mass of the scalar particles at the GUT scale, ${m_0}$.
1227: Therefore the excluded regions in the (${M_2, \mu}$) plane
1228: are a function of the values of ${m_0}$ and $\tan\beta$.
1229: The results presented in this section are obtained performing a scan over
1230: $\,0 \leq M_2 \leq 1000$ \GeV,
1231: $- 500$ \GeV{} $\leq \mu \leq$ 500 \GeV, $0 \leq m_0 \leq 500$ \gev{}
1232: and $0.7 \leq \tan\beta \leq 40$.
1233: They do not depend on the value of the
1234: trilinear coupling in the Higgs sector, $A$.
1235:
1236:
1237: A point in the MSSM parameter space is excluded if the total number
1238: of expected events is greater than the combined upper limit at 95\% C.L.
1239: on the number of signal events. Neutralino, chargino and scalar
1240: lepton analyses are combined since several processes can occur at a given
1241: point.
1242:
1243: In addition to the limits obtained with this analysis, we take into account
1244: the constraints from the L3 cross section measurements at the Z pole.
1245: A point in the MSSM parameter space is excluded at 95\% C.L.
1246: by Z lineshape measurements if:
1247: \begin{equation}{(\frac{\sigma_{SUSY}}{\sigma_{\mathrm Z}}}) \;
1248: {\Gamma_{\mathrm Z}} > {\Gamma_{LIM}}\,,
1249: \end{equation}
1250: %
1251: where $\sigma_{SUSY}$ is the sum of the
1252: pair-production cross sections
1253: of supersymmetric particles at the Z pole,
1254: calculated with {\tt SUSYGEN}.
1255: $\sigma_{\mathrm Z}$ is the measured total Z cross section,
1256: $\Gamma_{\mathrm Z}$ and
1257: $\Gamma_{LIM} = 22\MeV$ are
1258: the measured total Z width and
1259: the 95\% C.L. upper limit on possible
1260: non-Standard Model contributions to the total Z width~\cite{gammalim}.
1261:
1262: Figures~\ref{fig:excl_tot1} and~\ref{fig:excl_tot2} show the
1263: excluded regions at 95\% C.L. in the (${M_2, \mu}$) plane
1264: for $\tan\beta=$ $\sqrt 2$ and ${m_0} = $ 500 \GeV,
1265: and for $\tan\beta=$ 40 and ${m_0} = $ 70 \GeV.
1266: Some regions beyond the chargino
1267: kinematic limit are excluded at large $m_0$
1268: and low $\tan\beta$ values by the
1269: $\chim\chin_{(n\geq 2)}$ analyses (Figure~\ref{fig:excl_tot1})
1270: and at low $m_0$ by the $\chio\chio$ analyses (Figure~\ref{fig:excl_tot2}).
1271:
1272:
1273:
1274:
1275: \subsection{\boldmath{Lightest scalar lepton $\slepr$ as LSP}}
1276: \label{par:MSSM_slepton_LSP}
1277:
1278: For 0 $\leq{m_0}<$ 50 \GeV{} and 1 $\leq \tan\beta<$2 the lightest
1279: scalar lepton, the supersymmetric partner of the right-handed electron,
1280: can be the LSP. In this region,
1281: in the presence of dominant $\mathrm \lambda_{ijk}$ coupling, the
1282: decay chain $\mathrm \chio \ra \ell \slepr \ra \ell \ell \nu$
1283: leads to the same final states as those arising from neutralino
1284: direct R-parity violating decays, so that the analysis is efficient
1285: also when the lightest scalar lepton is the LSP.
1286:
1287: When the $\mathrm \lambda'_{ijk}$ or $\mathrm \lambda''_{ijk}$
1288: couplings dominate, the decays
1289: $\chio \ra \ell \slepr \ra \ell \ell \ell (\nu)$qq or
1290: $\chio \ra \ell \slepr \ra \ell \ell$qqq
1291: occur, respectively.
1292: Those five-body decays are not implemented in
1293: {\tt SUSYGEN}. However, since in this region $\slepr$
1294: is lighter than $\chio$, we can take into account the scalar lepton
1295: decays $\slepr \ra \ell \ell (\nu)$qq or
1296: $\slepr \ra \ell$qqq, as described
1297: at the end of Sections~\ref{par:lambdapri_anal}
1298: and~\ref{par:lambdasec_anal}.
1299:
1300:
1301: \subsection{Mass Limits}
1302: \label{par:mass_limits}
1303:
1304:
1305: Figure~\ref{fig:mlimit1} shows the 95\% C.L. lower limits on neutralino and
1306: scalar lepton masses as a function of \tb. The $\chio$ and $\chid$
1307: mass limits are shown for $m_0 = $ 500 \gev{} and the $\slepr$ ones for
1308: $m_0 =$ 0.
1309: At low \mo ($\mo \leq $ 70 \GeV), neutralino and scalar
1310: lepton pair-production is enhanced,
1311: allowing to obtain better results also at low values of \tb.
1312: For high \mo values, these contributions are suppressed and the mass limit
1313: is given by the chargino exclusion.
1314: The absolute minimum on the scalar lepton mass is found at \mo = 0.
1315: For low $m_0$ values the different
1316: contributions depend on \tb, since the $\slepr$
1317: can be the LSP for low \tb\ values (\tb\ $<$ 2) and therefore only
1318: the scalar lepton analysis contributes to the limit in this region.
1319: For higher values of \tb, $\chio$ is the LSP, and the lower limit on the
1320: scalar lepton mass is mainly given by the $\chio\chio$
1321: exclusion contours.
1322: As an example,
1323: Figure~\ref{fig:m2m0}a and~\ref{fig:m2m0}b
1324: show the 95\% C.L. lower limits on the mass
1325: of the supersymmetric partner of the right-handed electron for \tb
1326: $\, = 1$ and 2, respectively.
1327:
1328: The minima on the 95\% C.L. lower mass limits
1329: shown in Figure~\ref{fig:mlimit1} correspond to the
1330: absolute minima from
1331: the complete scan on $M_2$, $\mu$, ${m_0}$ and $\tan\beta$.
1332: The absolute limit on $M_{\slepr}$ is found at $\tan\beta = 0.7$ in the
1333: case of $\lambda_{ijk}$ and $\lambda'_{ijk}$ and at $\tan\beta = 1.4$ for
1334: $\lambda''_{ijk}$. The difference is due to the lower
1335: cross-section upper limit
1336: of $\lambda''_{ijk}$ for scalar lepton direct decays
1337: (Figure~\ref{fig:cross_sec2}), since for $\lambda_{ijk}$ and
1338: $\lambda'_{ijk}$ the limit on $M_{\slepr}$ is found when the $\slepr$
1339: is the LSP. Figure~\ref{fig:mlimit2} shows similar mass limits
1340: for $m_0 = $ 50 \gev.
1341: The chargino mass limit is almost independent of $\tan\beta$,
1342: being close to the kinematic limit for any value of $\tan\beta$ and $m_0$.
1343:
1344: We derive lower limits at 95\% C.L. on the
1345: neutralino, chargino and scalar lepton masses, as detailed
1346: in Table~\ref{tab:limits_189}.
1347: All analysis contributions (neutralino, chargino and scalar lepton
1348: searches) are taken into account simultaneously
1349: under the assumption of gaugino and scalar masses unification at the
1350: GUT scale.
1351:
1352: Identical scalar lepton mass limits are obtained even
1353: without the assumption of common scalar masses at the GUT scale.
1354: For $\lambda_{ijk}$ and $\lambda'_{ijk}$ the present
1355: bounds on the scalar lepton masses are found in the case in which
1356: the $\slepr$ is the LSP. For $\lambda''_{ijk}$ this happens
1357: when the $\slepr$ and $\chio$ are nearly degenerate in mass. In both
1358: cases
1359: the neutralino analyses give the main contribution to the exclusion
1360: in the regions of the parameter space around the limit.
1361: The remaining sensitivity is due to searches for direct slepton decays
1362: via $\lambda_{ijk}$. As these searches are equally sensitive to scalar
1363: electron, muon or tau signals as shown in Figure~\ref{fig:cross_sec2},
1364: the limits are unchanged.
1365:
1366:
1367: %\clearpage
1368: \begin{table*} [htbp]
1369: \begin{center}
1370: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|} \hline
1371:
1372: Particle Mass & $\lambda_{ijk}$ & $\lambda'_{ijk}$ & $\lambda''_{ijk}$ \\ \hline
1373: $\mchi$ \rpvpham & 32.6 \gev & 32.5 \gev & 32.5 \gev \\ \hline
1374: $\mchid$ \rpvpham & 69.5 \gev & 68.0 \gev & 68.0 \gev \\ \hline
1375: $\mchit$ \rpvpham & 99.3 \gev & 99.0 \gev & 99.0 \gev \\ \hline
1376: $\mcha$ \rpvpham & 94.3 \gev & 93.8 \gev & 93.8 \gev \\ \hline
1377: $M_{\slepr}$ \rpvpham& 75.9 \gev & 68.8 \gev & 77.5 \gev \\ \hline
1378: $M_{\snu}$ \rpvpham & 141.2 \gev & $-$ & $-$ \\ \hline
1379:
1380: \end{tabular}
1381: \caption{Lower limits at 95\% C.L. on the masses of the supersymmetric
1382: particles considered in this analysis. The limits on $M_{\slepr}$ hold
1383: for ${\serr}$, $\smur$ and $\staur$.}
1384: \label{tab:limits_189}
1385: \end{center}
1386: \end{table*}
1387:
1388:
1389: The search for R-parity violating decays of supersymmetric particles
1390: reaches at least the same sensitivity as in the R-parity
1391: conserving case~\cite{rpc_susy}.
1392: Therefore, the supersymmetry limits obtained at LEP are independent of
1393: R-parity conservation assumptions.
1394:
1395:
1396:
1397: %\newpage
1398: \section*{Acknowledgements}
1399:
1400: We wish to express our gratitude to the CERN accelerator divisions
1401: for the excellent performance of the LEP machine. We acknowledge
1402: the contributions of the engineers and technicians who have participated
1403: in the construction and maintenance of this experiment.
1404:
1405:
1406:
1407: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1408: % Bibliography
1409: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1410: %
1411: \clearpage
1412:
1413: \bibliographystyle{l3stylem}
1414:
1415: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
1416:
1417: \bibitem{MSSM} A review can be found for example in: \\
1418: H.E. Haber and G.L. Kane, Phys. Rep. {\bf 117} (1985) 75. % MSSM
1419:
1420: \bibitem{superp} C.S. Aulakh and R.N. Mohapatra, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 119} (1982) 136; \\
1421: F. Zwirner, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 132} (1983) 103; \\
1422: L.J. Hall and M. Suzuki, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B 231} (1984) 419. \\
1423: For a recent review and a reference to the literature: \\
1424: H. Dreiner, ``An introduction to explicit R-parity
1425: violation'', hep--ph/9707435, published in {\it
1426: Perspectives on Supersymmetry}, ed. G.L. Kane, World Scientific,
1427: Singapore (1998).
1428:
1429: \bibitem{superp2} R. Barbieri and A. Masiero, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B 267} (1986) 679.
1430:
1431:
1432: \bibitem{weinberg} S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 26} (1982) 287; \\
1433: G. Bhattacharyya and P.B. Pal,
1434: hep--ph/9809493, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 59} (1999) 097701.
1435:
1436: \bibitem{pdg2000} Particle Data Group, D.E. Groom \etal, Eur. Phys. J.
1437: {\bf C 15} (2000) 1.
1438:
1439: \bibitem{rpc_susy}
1440: L3 Collab., M. Acciarri \etal, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 471} (1999) 280,
1441: Phys. Lett. {\bf B 472} (2000) 420
1442: and references therein.
1443:
1444: \bibitem{single_snu}
1445: L3 Collab., M. Acciarri \etal, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 489} (2000) 81.
1446:
1447: \bibitem{dawson}
1448: S. Dawson, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B 261} (1985) 297.
1449:
1450: \bibitem{rpv_l3}
1451: L3 Collab., M. Acciarri \etal, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 459} (1999) 354. % LLE, UDD 183
1452:
1453: \bibitem{rpv_publ}
1454: ALEPH Collab., D. Buskulic \etal, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 349} (1995) 238; \\ %LLE Z
1455: ALEPH Collab., D. Buskulic \etal, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 384} (1996) 461; \\ %LLE 133
1456: ALEPH Collab., R. Barate \etal, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C 4}
1457: (1998) 433; \\ % LLE 130-172 \GeV{}
1458: ALEPH Collab., R. Barate \etal, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C 7} (1999) 383;
1459: \\ % LQD 130-172 \GeV{}
1460: ALEPH Collab., R. Barate \etal, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C 13} (2000) 29; \\ % all 183
1461: DELPHI Collab., P. Abreu \etal, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C 13} (2000) 591; \\ % LLE 183
1462: DELPHI Collab., P. Abreu \etal, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 487} (2000) 36; \\ % LLE 189
1463: OPAL Collab., G. Abbiendi \etal, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C 11} (1999) 619; \\ % gauginos 183
1464: OPAL Collab., G. Abbiendi \etal, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C 12} (2000) 1. % sfermions 183
1465:
1466:
1467:
1468: \bibitem{L3} L3 Collab., B. Adeva \etal, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. {\bf A 289} (1990) 35; \\
1469: J.A. Bakken \etal, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. {\bf A 275 } (1989) 81; \\
1470: O. Adriani \etal, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. {\bf A 302} (1991) 53; \\
1471: B. Adeva \etal, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. {\bf A 323} (1992) 109; \\
1472: K. Deiters \etal, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. {\bf A 323} (1992) 162; \\
1473: M. Chemarin \etal, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. {\bf A 349} (1994) 345; \\
1474: M. Acciarri \etal, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. {\bf A 351} (1994) 300; \\
1475: G. Basti \etal, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. {\bf A 374} (1996) 293; \\
1476: I.C. Brock \etal, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. {\bf A 381} (1996) 236; \\
1477: A. Adam \etal, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. {\bf A 383} (1996) 342.
1478:
1479:
1480: \bibitem{susygen} %{\tt SUSYGEN:} \\
1481: S. Katsanevas and S. Melachroinos, Proceedings of the Workshop
1482: ``Physics at LEP 2'', eds. G. Altarelli, T.~Sj{\"o}strand and
1483: F. Zwirner, CERN 96-01 (1996), vol. 2, p. 328. \\
1484: {\tt SUSYGEN 2.2}, S. Katsanevas and P. Morawitz, %hep--ph/9711417,
1485: Comp. Phys. Comm. {\bf 112} (1998) 227.
1486:
1487:
1488: \bibitem{pythia} {\tt PYTHIA} Version 5.722 is used. \\
1489: T.~Sj{\"o}strand, preprint
1490: CERN-TH/7112/93 (1993), revised August 1995;
1491: Comp. Phys. Comm. {\bf 82} (1994) 74, hep-ph/0001032.
1492:
1493: \bibitem{bhwide} %{\tt BHWIDE},
1494: S. Jadach \etal, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 390} (1997) 298.
1495:
1496: \bibitem{koralz} {\tt KORALZ} Version 4.02 is used. \\
1497: S. Jadach, B.F.L. Ward, and Z. W\c{a}s, Comp. Phys. Comm. {\bf 79} (1994) 503.
1498:
1499: \bibitem{phojet} {\tt PHOJET} Version 1.05 is used. \\
1500: R. Engel, Z. Phys. {\bf C 66} (1995) 203; \\
1501: R. Engel and J. Ranft, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 54} (1996) 4244.
1502:
1503: \bibitem{diag36} %{\tt DIAG36:}
1504: F.A. Berends, P.H. Daverveldt and R. Kleiss, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B 253} (1985) 441.
1505:
1506: \bibitem{koralw} {\tt KORALW} Version 1.33 is used. \\
1507: M. Skrzypek \etal, Comp. Phys. Comm. {\bf 94} (1996) 216; \\
1508: M. Skrzypek \etal, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 372} (1996) 289.
1509:
1510: \bibitem{EXCALIBUR} %{\tt EXCALIBUR:}
1511: F.A.~Berends, R.~Kleiss and R.~Pittau,
1512: Comp. Phys. Comm. {\bf 85} (1995) 437.
1513:
1514: \bibitem{geant} {\tt GEANT} Version 3.15 is used. \\
1515: R. Brun \etal, preprint CERN DD/EE/84-1 (Revised 1987).
1516:
1517: \bibitem{gheisha} %{\tt GHEISHA:}\\
1518: H. Fesefeldt, RWTH Aachen Report PITHA 85/2 (1985).
1519:
1520: \bibitem{durham}
1521: S. Catani \etal, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 269} (1991) 432; \\
1522: S. Bethke \etal, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B 370} (1992) 310; \\
1523: N. Brown and W.J. Stirling, Z. Phys. {\bf C 53} (1992) 629.
1524:
1525: \bibitem {gammalim}
1526: L3 Collab., M. Acciarri \etal, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C 16} (2000) 1.
1527:
1528: \bibitem{upperlimit}
1529: R.D. Cousins and V.L. Highland, Nucl. Instr. and. Meth. {\bf A 320} (1992) 331.
1530:
1531:
1532: \bibitem {grivaz}
1533: J.F. Grivaz and F. Le Diberder, preprint { LAL 92-37 } (1992).
1534:
1535:
1536:
1537: \end{thebibliography}
1538:
1539: \clearpage
1540: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1541: % The author list
1542: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1543: %
1544: \newpage
1545: \input namelist223.tex
1546: \newpage
1547: %
1548:
1549: \clearpage
1550:
1551:
1552: %\newpage
1553: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1554: \begin{center}
1555: \hspace{-2.0 cm}
1556: \includegraphics[width=17.5 cm, height=1.2 cm]{head1.eps}
1557: \end{center}
1558: %\vspace{0.5truecm}
1559: \begin{center}
1560: \includegraphics[width=16.5cm, height=16.5cm]{fig1.eps}
1561: \end{center}
1562: \caption{Data and Monte Carlo
1563: distributions of a) the number of leptons, b) acollinearity,
1564: c) the normalised visible
1565: energy and d) ln(${y_{34}}$) after the
1566: $\mathrm \lambda_{ijk}$ preselection.
1567: The solid histograms show the expectations for Standard Model
1568: processes at $ \rts =$ 189 \GeV.
1569: The dotted and dashed histograms
1570: show two examples of signal, with dominant coupling $\lambda_{133}$.
1571: The dotted histograms represent the process $\mathrm \epem \ra
1572: \protect\chio\protect\chio$, for $\protect\mchi =94$ \GeV,
1573: corresponding to five hundred times the luminosity of the data.
1574: The dashed ones
1575: represent $\mathrm \epem \ra \protect\chap\protect\cham$, with $\protect\mcha = 94$ \GeV{} and
1576: $\DM = \protect\mcha - \protect\mchi = 40$ \GeV{},
1577: corresponding to twenty times the luminosity.}
1578: \label{fig:ps_lambda}
1579: \end{figure}
1580:
1581:
1582: %\clearpage
1583: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1584: \begin{center}
1585: \hspace{-2.0 cm}
1586: \includegraphics[width=17.5 cm, height=1.2 cm]{head2.eps}
1587: \end{center}
1588: %\vspace{0.5truecm}
1589: \begin{center}
1590: \includegraphics[width=16.5cm, height=16.5cm]{fig2.eps}
1591: \end{center}
1592: \caption{Data and Monte Carlo
1593: distributions of a) ln(${y_{34}}$), b) thrust, c)
1594: normalised visible energy
1595: and d) polar angle of the missing momentum after the
1596: $\lambda'_{ijk}$ preselection.
1597: The solid histograms show the expectations for Standard Model
1598: processes at $ \rts =$ 189 \GeV.
1599: The dashed and dotted histograms show two examples of
1600: signal, with coupling $\lambda'_{311}$.
1601: The dashed histograms represent the process
1602: $\mathrm \epem \ra \protect\chio\protect\chio \ra $ 4 jets $\nu\bar\nu$,
1603: with $ \protect\mchi = 15$ \GeV{}, corresponding to
1604: thirty times the luminosity of the data.
1605: The dotted ones represent
1606: $\mathrm \epem \ra \protect\chap\protect\cham$, with $\protect\mcha = 94$ \GeV{} and
1607: $\DM = \protect\mcha - \protect\mchi = 55$~\GeV{}, with subsequent $\protect\chio\protect\chio$ decays
1608: into 4 jets $\nu\bar\nu$, corresponding to one hundred
1609: times the luminosity.}
1610: \label{fig:ps_lambdaprime}
1611: \end{figure}
1612:
1613: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1614: \begin{center}
1615: \hspace{-2.0 cm}
1616: \includegraphics[width=17.5 cm, height=1.2 cm]{head3.eps}
1617: \end{center}
1618: %\vspace{0.5truecm}
1619: \begin{center}
1620: \includegraphics[width=16.5cm, height=16.5cm]{fig3.eps}
1621: \end{center}
1622: \caption{Data and Monte Carlo
1623: distributions of a) ln(${y_{34}}$), b) thrust, c) ln(${y_{45}}$)
1624: and d) width of the most energetic jet after the
1625: $\lambda''_{ijk}$ preselection.
1626: The solid histograms show the expectations for Standard Model
1627: processes at $ \rts =$ 189 \GeV.
1628: The dashed and dotted histograms show two examples of
1629: signal, with dominant coupling $ \lamuno$, corresponding to decays into
1630: c, d and s quarks.
1631: The dashed histograms represent the process
1632: $\mathrm \epem \ra \protect\chio\protect\chio$, with $ \protect\mchi = 94$ \GeV{}, corresponding to
1633: one thousand times the luminosity of the data.
1634: The dotted ones represent the same process, with
1635: $ \protect\mchi = 30$ \GeV{}, corresponding to fifteen times the luminosity.}
1636: \label{fig:ps_lambdasec}
1637: \end{figure}
1638:
1639:
1640: %%\clearpage
1641:
1642: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1643: \begin{center}
1644: \vspace{1.0 cm}
1645: \includegraphics[width=\figwidth]{fig4.eps}
1646: \end{center}
1647: \caption{
1648: 95\% C.L. upper limits on: a) the neutralino pair-production cross
1649: section as a function of the neutralino mass;
1650: the chargino pair-production cross
1651: section b) as a function of the chargino mass,
1652: in the direct decay mode and c)
1653: as a function
1654: of $\DM = \protect\mcha - \protect\mchi$, for $\protect\mcha = 94$ \GeV,
1655: in the indirect decay mode.
1656: The solid lines show the limits
1657: obtained by the $\lamtre $ analysis,
1658: the dotted lines show those obtained by
1659: the $\lambda'_{311}$ analysis
1660: and the dashed lines show those obtained
1661: by the $ \lamuno $ analysis. }
1662: \label{fig:cross_sec1}
1663: \end{figure}
1664:
1665: %\clearpage
1666: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1667: \begin{center}
1668: \includegraphics[width=\figwidth]{fig5.eps}
1669: \end{center}
1670: \caption{
1671: 95\% C.L. upper limits on the scalar lepton pair-production cross
1672: section, in the direct decay mode, as a function of the scalar lepton mass
1673: for: a) $\lambda_{ijk}$, b) $\lambda'_{ijk}$ and c) $\lambda''_{ijk}$.
1674: The solid lines show the limits
1675: obtained by the $\lambda_{12k} $ analysis for scalar
1676: electrons, muons and taus and by the $\lambda_{121} $
1677: analysis for scalar neutrinos. The dashed line shows the limit obtained
1678: by the $\lambda'_{311}$ analysis for scalar
1679: electrons. The dotted lines show those obtained by
1680: the $\lamuno$ analysis for scalar electrons, muons
1681: and taus.}
1682: \label{fig:cross_sec2}
1683: \end{figure}
1684:
1685: %\clearpage
1686: \newpage
1687: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1688: \begin{center}
1689: \vspace{4cm}
1690: \includegraphics[width=\figwidth, height=11cm]{fig6.eps}
1691: \end{center}
1692: \caption{
1693: 95\% C.L. upper limits on the scalar lepton pair-production cross
1694: section, in the indirect decay mode, for
1695: $M_{\slepr} =$ 94 \gev{} and as a function of
1696: $\DM = M_{\slepr} - \protect\mchi$,
1697: for: a) $\lambda_{ijk}$, b) $\lambda'_{ijk}$ and c) $\lambda''_{ijk}$.
1698: The solid lines show the limits
1699: obtained by the $\lambda_{133} $ analysis for scalar leptons.
1700: The dashed line shows the limit obtained by the $\lambda'_{311}$
1701: analysis for scalar electrons.
1702: The dotted lines show those obtained by
1703: the $\lamuno$ analysis for scalar electrons, muons
1704: and taus.}
1705: \label{fig:cross_sec3}
1706: \end{figure}
1707:
1708:
1709: %\clearpage
1710: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1711: \begin{center}
1712: \includegraphics[width=8 cm, height=8cm]{fig7a.eps}
1713: \end{center}
1714: \begin{center}
1715: \includegraphics[width=8 cm, height=8cm]{fig7b.eps}
1716: \includegraphics[width=8 cm, height=8cm]{fig7c.eps}
1717: \end{center}
1718: \caption{Exclusion regions at 95\% C.L. for
1719: a) $\lamtre$, b) $\lambda'_{311}$ and c) $\lamuno$, for
1720: $\tan\beta = \sqrt 2$ and ${m_0} = 500 $ \GeV.
1721: The darker region is excluded by the Z lineshape measurements and the
1722: lighter region by the present analyses. The black solid lines
1723: indicate the chargino kinematic limit. The regions beyond
1724: the kinematic limit are excluded by neutralino analyses. }
1725: \label{fig:excl_tot1}
1726: \end{figure}
1727:
1728:
1729: %\clearpage
1730: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
1731: \begin{center}
1732: \includegraphics[width=8 cm, height=8cm]{fig8a.eps}
1733: \end{center}
1734: \begin{center}
1735: \includegraphics[width=8 cm, height=8cm]{fig8b.eps}
1736: \includegraphics[width=8 cm, height=8cm]{fig8c.eps}
1737: \end{center}
1738: \caption{
1739: Exclusion regions at 95\% C.L. for
1740: a) $\lamtre$, b) $\lambda'_{311}$ and c) $\lamuno$, for
1741: $\tan\beta = 40$ and ${m_0} = 70 $ \GeV.
1742: The darker region is excluded by the Z lineshape measurements and the
1743: lighter region by the present analyses. The black solid lines
1744: indicate the chargino kinematic limit. The regions beyond
1745: the kinematic limit are excluded by
1746: neutralino analyses. }
1747: \label{fig:excl_tot2}
1748: \end{figure*}
1749:
1750:
1751:
1752:
1753: %\clearpage
1754: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
1755: \begin{center}
1756: \includegraphics[width=\figwidth]{fig9.epsi}
1757: \end{center}
1758: \caption{
1759: The solid, dashed and dotted lines, labelled with the corresponding
1760: coupling, show the
1761: 95\% C.L. lower limits on the masses of a) $\protect\chio$, b) $\protect\chid$ and
1762: c) $\slepr$, as a function of \tb, for
1763: $0 \leq M_2 \leq 1000$ \gev{} and $- 500$ \GeV{} $\leq \mu \leq$ 500 \GeV.
1764: $m_0 = $ 500 \gev{} in a) and b) and $m_0 = 0$ in c). }
1765: \label{fig:mlimit1}
1766: \end{figure*}
1767:
1768: %\clearpage
1769: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
1770: \begin{center}
1771: \includegraphics[width=9.5 cm, height=9 cm]{fig10a.epsi}
1772: \end{center}
1773: \vspace{0.5 cm}
1774: \begin{center}
1775: \includegraphics[width=9.5 cm, height=9 cm]{fig10b.epsi}
1776: \end{center}
1777: \caption{
1778: 95\% C.L. exclusion contours in the ($M_2 \,$, $m_0$) plane,
1779: for $\mu < 0$ and \tb $\,= 1$ (a) or \tb $\,= 2$ (b).
1780: The lines labelled with the corresponding value in \gev{} represent the
1781: contours of constant scalar electron mass $\mser$.
1782: The solid, dotted and dashed curves show the 95\% C.L. lower limits
1783: on $M_2$ as
1784: a function of $m_0$. The contributions from scalar lepton, neutralino and
1785: chargino searches are included. }
1786: \label{fig:m2m0}
1787: \end{figure*}
1788:
1789:
1790: %\clearpage
1791: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
1792: \begin{center}
1793: \includegraphics[width=\figwidth]{fig11.epsi}
1794: \end{center}
1795: \caption{
1796: The solid, dashed and dotted lines, labelled with the corresponding
1797: coupling, show the
1798: 95\% C.L. lower limits on the masses of a) $\protect\chio$, b) $\protect\chid$ and
1799: c) $\slepr$, as a function of \tb, for
1800: $0 \leq M_2 \leq 1000$ \gev{}, $- 500$ \GeV{} $\leq \mu \leq$ 500 \GeV and
1801: $m_0 = $ 50 \gev{}.}
1802: \label{fig:mlimit2}
1803: \end{figure*}
1804:
1805:
1806:
1807:
1808: %\clearpage
1809: \appendix
1810: \section{Selection details}
1811: \label{par:appendix_sel}
1812:
1813:
1814: Dedicated selections are performed to maximize {\it a priori} the
1815: analysis sensitivity $\mathrm 1/\sigma_{95}$, using
1816: Monte Carlo signal and background events, where
1817: $\mathrm \sigma_{95}$ is given by~\cite{grivaz}:
1818: \begin{equation}
1819: \mathrm \sigma_{95} = \frac {1}{\varepsilon}
1820: \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} c_n(b) P_b \,(n).
1821: \end{equation}
1822: Here $\mathrm \varepsilon$ is the signal selection efficiency,
1823: $\mathrm P_b \,(n) $ is the Poisson probability to observe
1824: $n$ events with an expected background of $b$ events
1825: and $\mathrm c_n(b)$ are the 95\% C.L. Bayesian
1826: upper limits on the signal expectation values.
1827:
1828:
1829: In Tables~\ref{tab:lambda_sel1} to~\ref{tab:lambdasec_sel3}
1830: we summarize all selections.
1831: In addition to the variables described in Sections~\ref{par:lambda_anal},
1832: \ref{par:lambdapri_anal} and \ref{par:lambdasec_anal},
1833: we apply cuts on the following variables:
1834: \begin{itemize}
1835:
1836: \item $\lambda_{ijk}$:
1837: \begin{itemize}
1838: \item event thrust,
1839: \item sum of the energies measured in the low angle calorimeters
1840: (Luminosity monitor and Active Lead Ring)
1841: covering the polar angle region between $\mathrm 1.5^\circ$ and
1842: $\mathrm 9.0^\circ$ ($E_{lum} + E_{alr}$),
1843: \item energy in the electromagnetic ($E_{bgo}$) and hadronic
1844: calorimeters ($E_{hcal}$),
1845: \item energy ($E^{\ell}_n$) of the
1846: $n$ identified leptons.
1847: \end{itemize}
1848:
1849:
1850: \item $\lambda'_{ijk}$:
1851: \begin{itemize}
1852: \item energy in a cone of $\mathrm 12^\circ$ half-opening angle around the
1853: beam axis ($E_{v12}$),
1854: \item sphericity,
1855: \item probability
1856: ($Prob(\chi^2_{WW},5)$ or $Prob(\chi^2_{ZZ},5)$) that the
1857: reconstructed invariant mass, after a 5C fit, is consistent with
1858: $\WpWm$ or ZZ pair-production,
1859: \item energy ($E_{20}^{\ell}$) in a cone of $\mathrm 20^\circ$
1860: half-opening
1861: angle around the direction of the lepton candidate, calculated
1862: subtracting the lepton energy,
1863: \item jet invariant masses ($M_{jet1}$ and $M_{jet2}$).
1864: \end{itemize}
1865:
1866:
1867: \item $\lambda''_{ijk}$:
1868: \begin{itemize}
1869: \item jet widths
1870: \item $E_{20}^{\ell}$.
1871: \end{itemize}
1872: \end{itemize}
1873:
1874: The cut values are chosen
1875: according to the procedure described above.
1876: In particular, the selection criteria for the variables marked with~*
1877: are optimized simultaneously.
1878:
1879:
1880:
1881: %\clearpage
1882: \begin{table*}[hpb]
1883: \begin{center}
1884: \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|} \hline
1885:
1886: \multicolumn{5}{|c|} {$\lambda_{ijk}: \;
1887: 4\ell + \Emiss \,$ } \cr \hline
1888:
1889: \multicolumn{1}{|c|} { }
1890: &\multicolumn{2}{c|} {Low mass values $( \leq 25 \gev)$ }
1891: &\multicolumn{2}{c|} {High mass values $( \geq 25 \gev)$ } \cr \hline
1892:
1893: &$\ell =$ e, $\mu$ only & $\ell = \tau $ &$\ell =$ e, $\mu$ only & $\ell = \tau $ \\ \hline
1894: $N_{e,\mu}$ & $\geq$ 2 & $-$ & $\geq$ 2 & $-$ \\ \hline
1895: $N_{e,\mu,\tau}$ & $-$ & $\geq$ 3 & $-$ & $\geq$ 3
1896: \\ \hline
1897: $N_{tracks}$ & 4 & 4 -- 6 & 3 -- 4 & 3 -- 8 \\ \hline
1898: $N_{clusters}$ & 4 -- 8 & 4 -- 16 & 4 -- 8 & 6 -- 24 \\ \hline
1899: $E_{lum}+ E_{alr}$ (\gev)& $<$ 10 & $<$ 10 & $<$ 10 & $<$ 10 \\ \hline
1900: $E_{bgo}$ (\gev) & $<$ 150 & $>$ 20 & $<$ 100 & $-$ \\ \hline
1901: $E_{hcal}$ (\gev)& $<$ 10 & $<$ 15 & $<$ 10 & $-$ \\ \hline
1902: ${E_{vis}}/{\sqrt{s}}$ & 0.20 -- 0.90 & 0.20 -- 0.60& 0.20 -- 0.90 & 0.20 -- 0.60 \\ \hline
1903: $p^T_{miss}$ (\gev) & $>$ 7 & $>$ 7 & $>$ 7 & $>$ 7 \\ \hline
1904: * ${\it Thrust}$ & $-$ & $-$ & $<$ 0.947 & $<$ 0.918 \\ \hline
1905: * sin$(\theta_{miss})$ & $>$ 0.277 & $>$ 0.486 & $>$ 0.430 & $>$ 0.436 \\ \hline
1906: * $\theta_{acol}$ (rad) & $<$ 3.107 & $<$ 3.135 & $<$ 3.035 & $<$ 2.952 \\ \hline
1907: * $\theta_{acop}$ (rad) & $<$ 3.107 & $-$ & $<$ 3.050 & $<$ 3.044 \\ \hline
1908: * $\ytq $ & 0.0002 -- 0.0018 & 0.0002 -- 0.0020 & $>$ 0.00060$$ & $>$ 0.00056$$ \\ \hline
1909:
1910: \end{tabular}
1911: \caption{Cut values of the $4\ell + \Emiss \,$ selections, for final
1912: states with at least one $\tau$ or with $\ell =$ e, $\mu$ only.
1913: Topologies with four leptons plus missing energy result from neutralino,
1914: chargino and scalar neutrino decays,
1915: as detailed in Table~\ref{tab:topologies}.
1916: Different selection criteria are developed according to the
1917: mass values of the pair-produced supersymmetric particles. }
1918: \label{tab:lambda_sel1}
1919: \end{center}
1920: \end{table*}
1921:
1922: %\clearpage
1923: \begin{table*}
1924: \begin{center}
1925: \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|} \hline
1926:
1927: \multicolumn{3}{|c|} {$\lambda_{ijk}: \;
1928: 2\ell + \Emiss \,$ and $\, 6 \ell \,$} \cr \hline
1929:
1930: \multicolumn{1}{|c|} { }
1931: &\multicolumn{1}{c|} {$2 \ell + \Emiss \,$ }
1932: &\multicolumn{1}{c|} {$6 \ell$ } \cr \hline
1933:
1934: &$\ell =$ e, $\mu, \tau $ &$\ell =$ e, $\mu, \tau $ \\ \hline
1935:
1936:
1937: $N_{e,\mu,\tau}$ & $ =$ 2 & $\geq$ 4 \\ \hline
1938: $N_{tracks}$ & 2 -- 4 & 5 -- 11 \\ \hline
1939: $N_{clusters}$ & 3 -- 5 & 6 -- 18 \\ \hline
1940: $N_{jets8}$ & $ =$ 2 & $-$ \\ \hline
1941: $E_{lum}+ E_{alr}$ (\gev) & $<$ 10 & $<$ 10 \\ \hline
1942: $E_{bgo}$ (\gev) & $-$ & 15 -- 125 \\ \hline
1943: $E_1^{\ell}$ (\gev) & 30 -- 60 & $-$ \\ \hline
1944: $E_1^{\ell} + E_2^{\ell}$(\gev)& $>$ 40 & $-$ \\ \hline
1945: ${E_{vis}}/{\sqrt{s}}$ & 0.25 -- 0.55 & 0.30 -- 1.20 \\ \hline
1946: $p^T_{miss}$ (\gev) & $>$ 7 & $>$ 7 \\ \hline
1947: * ${\it Thrust}$ & $-$ & $<$ 0.971 \\ \hline
1948: * sin$(\theta_{miss})$ & $>$ 0.278 & $>$ 0.314 \\ \hline
1949: * $\theta_{acol}$ (rad) & $<$ 2.903 & $-$ \\ \hline
1950: * $\theta_{acop}$ (rad) & $<$ 2.904 & $-$ \\ \hline
1951: * $\ytq $ & $-$ & $>$ 0.0009 \\ \hline
1952:
1953: \end{tabular}
1954: \caption{Selection criteria of the $2\ell + \Emiss \,$ and $6 \ell$
1955: selections.
1956: Topologies with two leptons plus missing energy arise from
1957: chargino and scalar lepton direct decays, as shown in
1958: Table~\ref{tab:topologies}.
1959: Six lepton topologies result from chargino direct decays.
1960: Inclusive selection criteria
1961: are developed for final states with $\ell =$ e, $\mu$ or $ \tau$.}
1962: \label{tab:lambda_sel2}
1963: \end{center}
1964: \end{table*}
1965:
1966: %\clearpage
1967: \begin{table*}
1968: \begin{center}
1969: \begin{sideways}
1970: \begin{minipage}[b]{\textheight}
1971: \begin{center}
1972:
1973: \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline
1974: \multicolumn{8}{|c|}
1975: {$\lambda_{ijk}: \; (\geq 4) \,\ell \, +$ (jets) $+ \Emiss \,$,
1976: with $\ell =$ e, $\mu$ only} \cr \hline
1977:
1978: & $\DM \leq $ 20 \gev & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{$\DM = $ 20 -- 50 \gev}
1979: & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{$\DM \geq $ 50 \gev} \\ \hline
1980: $N_{e,\mu}$ & $\geq$ 2 & \multicolumn{3}{c|} {$\geq$ 2}
1981: & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{$\geq$ 2} \\ \hline
1982: $E_{lum}+E_{alr}$ (\gev)& $<$ 10 & \multicolumn{3}{c|} {$<$ 10 }
1983: & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{$<$ 10 } \\ \hline
1984: $E_{bgo}$ (\gev) & $<$ 110 & \multicolumn{3}{c|} {$<$ 110 }
1985: & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{$<$ 110 } \\ \hline
1986: $p^T_{miss}$ (\gev) & $>$ 7 & \multicolumn{3}{c|} {$>$ 7 }
1987: & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{$>$ 7} \\ \hline
1988: * ${\it Thrust}$ & $<$ 0.961 & \multicolumn{3}{c|} {$<$0.878}
1989: & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{$<$0.811} \\ \hline
1990: * sin($\theta_{miss}$) & $>$ 0.259 & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{$>$ 0.362}
1991: & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{$>$ 0.389} \\ \hline
1992: * $\theta_{acol}$ (rad) & $<$ 3.044 & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{ $<$ 3.112}
1993: & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{ $<$ 2.998} \\ \hline
1994: * $\theta_{acop}$ (rad) & $<$ 3.139 & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{ $<$ 3.136}
1995: & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{ $<$ 3.065} \\ \hline
1996: * $\ytq $ & $>$ 0.0026 & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{ $>$ 0.0109 }
1997: & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{ $>$ 0.0118 } \\ \hline
1998: & & $\mathrm{hadronic}$ & $\mathrm{mixed}$ & $\mathrm{leptonic}$
1999: & $\mathrm{hadronic}$ & $\mathrm{mixed}$ & $\mathrm{leptonic}$ \\ \hline
2000: $N_{tracks}$ & 5 -- 11 & 12 -- 26 & 8 -- 17 & 5 -- 8
2001: & 18 -- 28 & 8 -- 22 & 5 -- 6 \\ \hline
2002: $N_{clusters}$ & 6 -- 26 & 35 -- 52 & 18 -- 40 & 6 -- 12
2003: & 38 -- 60 & 20 -- 42 & 6 -- 11 \\ \hline
2004: ${E_{vis}}/{\sqrt{s}}$ & 0.30--0.90
2005: & 0.50--0.85 & 0.40--0.85 & 0.35--0.75
2006: & 0.60--0.90 & 0.45--0.80 & 0.30--0.75 \\ \hline
2007: \end{tabular}
2008: \end{center}
2009: \caption{Cut values of the $(\geq 4) \,\ell + $ (jets) $ + \Emiss \,$ selections,
2010: for final states with $\ell =$ e, $\mu$ only.
2011: Topologies with multileptons plus possible jets and missing energy
2012: result from neutralino, chargino and scalar lepton indirect decays,
2013: as presented in Table~\ref{tab:topologies}.
2014: Different selection criteria are developed depending on the
2015: mass differences
2016: $\DM = \protect\mcha - \protect\mchi$, $\protect\mchin - \protect\mchi$ or $\mslepr - \protect\mchi$.
2017: For large and medium $\DM$ three selections are applied according to
2018: the virtual W-pair decays into hadronic, mixed or leptonic final states.}
2019: \label{tab:lambda_sel3a}
2020: \end{minipage}
2021: \end{sideways}
2022: \end{center}
2023: \end{table*}
2024:
2025: %\clearpage
2026: \newpage
2027: \begin{table*}
2028: \begin{center}
2029: \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|} \hline
2030: \multicolumn{4}{|c|}
2031: {$\lambda_{ijk}: \; (\geq 4) \, \ell +$ (jets) $+ \Emiss \,$,
2032: with $\ell = \tau$} \cr \hline
2033:
2034: & $\DM \leq $ 20 \gev & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\DM \geq $ 20 \gev}
2035: \\ \hline
2036: $N_{e,\mu,\tau}$ & $\geq$ 3 & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\geq$ 3} \\ \hline
2037: $E_{lum}+E_{alr}$ (\gev)& $<$ 10 & \multicolumn{2}{c|} {$<$ 10 } \\ \hline
2038: $p^T_{miss}$ (\gev) & $>$ 7 & \multicolumn{2}{c|} {$>$ 7 } \\ \hline
2039: * ${\it Thrust}$ & $<$ 0.991 & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$<$0.832} \\ \hline
2040: * sin($\theta_{miss}$) & $>$ 0.396 & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$>$ 0.464} \\ \hline
2041: * $\theta_{acol}$ (rad) & $<$ 3.058 & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$<$ 3.092} \\ \hline
2042: * $\theta_{acop}$ (rad) & $-$ & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$<$ 3.140} \\ \hline
2043: * $\ytq $ &$>$ 0.0018 & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$>$ 0.0141} \\ \hline
2044: & & $\mathrm{hadronic}$ $\mathrm{and}$ $\mathrm{mixed}$ &
2045: $\mathrm{leptonic}$ \\ \hline
2046: $N_{tracks}$ & 6 -- 12 & 8 -- 25 & 5 -- 12 \\ \hline
2047: $N_{clusters}$ & 6 -- 32 & 20 -- 52 & 8 -- 24 \\ \hline
2048: ${E_{vis}}/{\sqrt{s}}$ & 0.30--0.65
2049: & 0.30--0.70 & 0.30--0.70 \\ \hline
2050: \end{tabular}
2051: \caption{Selection criteria
2052: of the $(\geq 4) \,\ell + $ (jets) $ + \Emiss \,$ selections,
2053: for final states with at least one $\tau$.
2054: Topologies with multileptons plus possible jets and missing energy
2055: arise from neutralino, chargino and scalar lepton indirect decays,
2056: as listed in Table~\ref{tab:topologies}.
2057: Different selection criteria are developed depending on the
2058: mass differences $\DM = \protect\mcha - \protect\mchi$, $\protect\mchin - \protect\mchi$ or $\mslepr - \protect\mchi$.
2059: For $\DM$ greater than 20 \gev{}, three selections are applied according to
2060: the virtual W-pair decays into hadronic and mixed or leptonic final states.}
2061: \label{tab:lambda_sel3b}
2062: \end{center}
2063: \end{table*}
2064:
2065: %%%%
2066:
2067: %\clearpage
2068: \begin{table*}
2069: \begin{center}
2070: \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|}\hline
2071:
2072: \multicolumn{4}{|c|} {$\lambda'_{ijk}: \;$
2073: 4 jets $\, + \,2 \tau$ }\cr\hline
2074:
2075: & Low masses & Medium masses & High masses \\
2076: & ($\leq$ 30 \gev) & (35--50 \gev) & ($\geq$ 55 \gev) \\\hline
2077: $E_{v12}/E_{vis}$ & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{$ <$ 0.20} \\ \hline
2078: $E_{lum}+E_{alr}$ (\gev) & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{$ <$ 1 } \\ \hline
2079: W mass window & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{reject if \; 70 \gev $< M_{qq}<$ 95 \gev
2080: \; and 70 \gev $< M_{\ell\nu} <$ 90 \gev} \\\hline
2081: $ N_{tracks}$ & 8--29 & 5--34 & 13--38 \\\hline
2082: $N_{clusters}$ & 16--63 & 24--73 & 43--94 \\\hline
2083: $N_{jets8}$ & -- & -- & $\geq 4$ \\\hline
2084: $N_{e,\mu,\tau}$ & $\geq 1$ & $\geq 1$ & $\geq 2$ \\\hline
2085: $E_{miss}/\sqrt{s}$ & $<0.33$ & $<0.35$ & $<0.24$ \\\hline
2086: ${\it Prob}(\chi^2_{WW},5)$ & -- & $<0.5$ & $<0.3$ \\\hline
2087: ${\it Prob}(\chi^2_{ZZ},5)$ & -- & -- & $<0.3$ \\\hline
2088: ${\it Sphericity}$ & 0.003--0.3 & $<0.42$ & 0.1--0.81 \\\hline
2089: $W_{jet1}$ & 0.04--0.36 & $\geq 0.1$ & $\geq 0.1$ \\\hline
2090: $W_{jet2}$ & 0.04--0.36 & $\geq 0.1$ & -- \\\hline
2091: $|M_{jet1}-M_{jet2}|$ (\gev) & $<$24 & -- & -- \\\hline
2092: $\theta_{acol}$ (rad) & -- & $<$3.09 & -- \\\hline
2093: $E_{bgo}/\sqrt{s}$ & 0.1--0.7 & 0.2--0.6 & 0.2--0.6\\\hline
2094: $E_{hcal}/\sqrt{s}$ & 0.05--0.4 & 0.05--0.3 & 0.05--0.35\\\hline
2095:
2096: * ${\it Thrust}$ & 0.94--0.99 & 0.83--0.98 & 0.61--0.83 \\\hline
2097: * ln($\ytq$) & $>-6.18 $&$>-5.55$ & $>-4.73$ \\\hline
2098: * sin($\theta_{miss}$) & $>0.24$ & $>0.67$ & $>0.66$ \\\hline
2099: * $E_{vis}/{\sqrt{s}}$ & 0.59--0.89 & 0.67--0.95 & 0.69--0.88 \\\hline
2100: * $\theta_{acop}$ (rad) & $<$ 3.139 & $<$3.093 & $<$ 3.136 \\\hline
2101: \end{tabular}
2102: \caption{Values of the selection requirements for
2103: the ``4 jets + 2 taus'' selections.
2104: These final states arise from neutralino decays via
2105: $\lambda'$ coupling, as shown in Table \ref{tab:topologies_lqd}.}
2106: \label{tab:lambdaprime_sel1}
2107: \end{center}
2108: \end{table*}
2109:
2110:
2111: %\clearpage
2112: \begin{table*}
2113: \begin{center}
2114: \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|}\hline
2115:
2116: \multicolumn{4}{|c|} {$\lambda'_{ijk}: \;$
2117: 4 jets $\, + \,\tau + \Emiss$ }\cr\hline
2118: & Low masses & Medium masses & High masses \\
2119: & ($\leq$ 30 \gev) & (35--50 \gev) & ($\geq$ 55 \gev) \\\hline
2120: $E_{v12}/E_{vis}$ & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{$ <$ 0.20} \\ \hline
2121: $E_{lum}+E_{alr}$ (\gev) & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{$ <$ 1 } \\ \hline
2122: $N_{e,\mu,\tau}$ & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{$\geq$ 1}\\\hline
2123: W mass window & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{reject if \; 70 \gev $< M_{qq}<$ 95 \gev
2124: \; and 70 \gev $< M_{\ell\nu} <$ 90 \gev} \\\hline
2125: $ N_{tracks}$ & 5--29 & 6--38 & 19--42 \\\hline
2126: $N_{clusters}$ & 15--65 & 20--77 & 43--97 \\\hline
2127: $E_{miss}/\sqrt{s}$ & $<$0.37 & $<$0.42 & 0.08--0.34 \\\hline
2128: ${\it Prob}(\chi^2_{WW},5)$ & $<$0.8 & $<$0.16 & $<$0.17 \\\hline
2129: ${\it Prob}(\chi^2_{ZZ},5)$ & $<$0.4 & -- & $<$0.5 \\\hline
2130: ${\it Sphericity}$ & $<$0.2 & $<$0.46 & 0.08--0.8 \\\hline
2131: $W_{jet1}$ & 0.03--0.4 & 0.04--0.65 & $\geq 0.2$ \\\hline
2132: $W_{jet2}$ & 0.03--0.5 & 0.04--0.65 & $\geq 0.05$ \\\hline
2133: $|M_{jet1}-M_{jet2}|$ (\gev) & $<$28 & -- & -- \\\hline
2134: $E_{bgo}/\sqrt{s}$ & 0.1--0.66 & 0.13--0.66 & 0.21--0.56\\\hline
2135: $E_{hcal}/\sqrt{s}$ & 0.03--0.41 & 0.03--0.41 & $<$0.40\\\hline
2136:
2137: * ${\it Thrust}$ & 0.95--0.99 & 0.84--0.99 & 0.60--0.85 \\\hline
2138: * ln($\ytq$) & $> -7.54$ & $> -6.74$ & $> -4.89$ \\\hline
2139: * sin($\theta_{miss}$) & $>$0.35 & $>$0.68 & $>$0.47 \\\hline
2140: * $E_{vis}/{\sqrt{s}}$& 0.63--0.92 & 0.67--0.84 & 0.62--0.82 \\\hline
2141: * $\theta_{acop}$ (rad) & $<$3.05 & $<$3.02 & -- \\\hline
2142: \end{tabular}
2143: \caption{Cut values of the ``4 jets $+ \,\tau + \Emiss$'' selections.
2144: These final states arise from neutralino decays via
2145: $\lambda'$ coupling, as detailed in
2146: Table~\ref{tab:topologies_lqd}.}
2147: \label{tab:lambdaprime_sel2}
2148: \end{center}
2149: \end{table*}
2150:
2151: %\clearpage
2152: \begin{table*}
2153: \begin{center}
2154: \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|}\hline
2155:
2156: \multicolumn{4}{|c|} {$\lambda'_{ijk}: \;$
2157: 4 jets $ \,+ \,\Emiss$ }\cr\hline
2158: & Low masses & Medium masses & High masses \\
2159: & ($\leq$ 30 \gev) & (35--50 \gev) & ($\geq$ 55 \gev) \\\hline
2160: $E_{v12}/E_{vis}$ & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{$ <$ 0.20} \\ \hline
2161: $E_{lum}+E_{alr}$ (\gev) & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{$ <$ 1 } \\ \hline
2162: $N_{jets8}$ & -- & -- & $\geq 3$ \\\hline
2163: $N_{e,\mu,\tau}$ & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{$\geq$ 1}\\\hline
2164: W mass window & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{reject if \; 70 \gev $< M_{qq}<$ 95 \gev
2165: \; and 70 \gev $< M_{\ell\nu} <$ 90 \gev} \\\hline
2166: $ N_{tracks}$ & 4--31 & 6--33 & 14--41 \\\hline
2167: $N_{clusters}$ & 10--64 & 18--74 & 43--99 \\\hline
2168: $E_{miss}/\sqrt{s}$ & $<$0.41 & $<$0.41 & 0.08--0.43 \\\hline
2169: ${\it Prob}(\chi^2_{WW},5)$ & -- & -- & $<$0.1 \\\hline
2170: ${\it Sphericity}$ & $<$0.3 & $<$0.52 & 0.05--0.78 \\\hline
2171: $W_{jet1}$ & 0.02--0.4 & 0.04--0.65 & $\geq 0.35$ \\\hline
2172: $W_{jet2}$ & 0.01--0.6 & 0.04--0.75 & $\geq 0.07$ \\\hline
2173: $|M_{jet1}-M_{jet2}|$ (\gev) & $<$25 & -- & -- \\\hline
2174: $E_{bgo}/\sqrt{s}$ & 0.08--0.57 & 0.11--0.57 & 0.11--0.57\\\hline
2175: $E_{hcal}/\sqrt{s}$ & 0.04--0.42 & 0.02--0.37 & 0.02--0.37\\\hline
2176:
2177: * ${\it Thrust}$ & $>$0.95 & 0.91--0.97 & 0.55--0.92 \\\hline
2178: * ln($\ytq$) & $>-8.63$ & $>-6.40$ & $>-4.74$ \\\hline
2179: * sin($\theta_{miss}$) & $>$0.66 & $>$0.47 & $>$0.62 \\\hline
2180: * $E_{vis}/{\sqrt{s}}$& 0.61--0.80 & 0.35--0.79 & 0.35--0.79 \\\hline
2181: * $\theta_{acop}$ (rad) & $<$3.07 & $<$3.05 & $<$3. \\\hline
2182: \end{tabular}
2183: \caption{Values of the selection requirements for the
2184: ``4 jets + $\Emiss$'' selections.
2185: These final states follow from neutralino decays via
2186: $\lambda'$ coupling, as listed in Table~\ref{tab:topologies_lqd}.}
2187: \label{tab:lambdaprime_sel3}
2188: \end{center}
2189: \end{table*}
2190:
2191:
2192:
2193: %%%%
2194:
2195: %\clearpage
2196: \begin{table*}
2197: \begin{center}
2198:
2199: \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|} \hline
2200:
2201: \multicolumn{4}{|c|} {$\lambda'_{ijk}: \;$
2202: multijets + leptons }\cr\hline
2203:
2204: $N_{clusters}$ & \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{$ \geq$ 13} \\\hline
2205: $N_{tracks}$ & \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{$ \geq$ 10} \\\hline
2206: $E_{v12}/E_{vis}$ & \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{$ <$ 0.30} \\\hline
2207: sin($\theta_{T}$) & \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{$ >$0.139} \\\hline
2208: $E_{par}/E_{vis}$ &\multicolumn{3}{|c|}{$ <$0.5} \\\hline
2209: $E_{perp}/E_{vis}$ &\multicolumn{3}{|c|}{$ <$0.2} \\\hline
2210: $N_{jets8}$ &\multicolumn{3}{|c|}{$ \geq$ 3} \\\hline
2211: $E_{vis}/\sqrt{s}$&\multicolumn{3}{|c|}{$ \geq$ 0.7} \\\hline
2212: sin($\theta_{miss}$) & \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{$ >$0.139} \\\hline
2213: $N_{e,\mu}$ & \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{$ \geq$ 2,
2214: one isolated ($E^{\ell}_{20} < 1$ \gev, $E_{lepton}> 5$ \gev)} \\\hline
2215: %
2216: $\mcha$ \rpvpham (\gev) & 50 & 60 & $\geq $ 70 \\\hline
2217: * ${\it Thrust}$ & 0.82--0.89 & 0.74--0.88 &0.51--0.79 \\\hline
2218: * ln($\ytq$) & $>-5.56$ & $>-5.22$ & $> -5.80$ \\\hline
2219: * ln($\yqc$) & $>-5.97$ & $>-5.66$ & $> -5.24$ \\\hline
2220: \end{tabular}
2221: \caption{Cut values for $\lambda'_{ijk}$ chargino
2222: selections with a multijet topology with at least 2 leptons and no
2223: missing energy, as detailed in Table \ref{tab:topologies_lqd}.
2224: Different selection criteria are developed according to the mass values
2225: of the pair--produced charginos.}
2226: \label{tab:lambdaprime_sel4}
2227: \end{center}
2228: \end{table*}
2229:
2230: %\clearpage
2231: \begin{table*}
2232: \begin{center}
2233: \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|} \hline
2234:
2235: \multicolumn{4}{|c|}{$\lambda'_{ijk}: \;$
2236: multijets + $\Emiss$ }\cr\hline
2237:
2238: $N_{clusters}$ & \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{$ \geq$ 13} \\\hline
2239: $N_{tracks}$ & \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{$ \geq$ 10} \\\hline
2240: $E_{v12}/E_{vis}$ & \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{$ <$ 0.30} \\\hline
2241: sin($\theta_{T}$) & \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{$ >$0.139} \\\hline
2242: $E_{par}/E_{vis}$ &\multicolumn{3}{|c|}{$ <$0.5} \\\hline
2243: $E_{perp}/E_{vis}$ &\multicolumn{3}{|c|}{$ <$0.2} \\\hline
2244: $N_{jets8}$ &\multicolumn{3}{|c|}{$ \geq$ 3} \\\hline
2245: $E_{vis}/\sqrt{s}$&\multicolumn{3}{|c|}{0.5--0.9} \\\hline
2246: sin($\theta_{miss}$) & \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{$ >$0.436} \\\hline
2247: \multicolumn{4}{|c|}{events with one isolated lepton
2248: ($E_{20}^{\ell} <$ 1 \GeV ) are rejected} \\\hline
2249: %
2250: $\mcha$ \rpvpham (\gev) & 50 & 60 & $\geq $ 70 \\\hline
2251: * ${\it Thrust}$ & 0.82--0.90 & 0.71--0.84 &0.54--0.80 \\\hline
2252: * ln($\ytq$) & $>-5.68$ & $>-5.70$ & $>-4.56$ \\\hline
2253: * ln($\yqc$) & $>-6.17$ & $>-5.94$ & $>-5.21$ \\\hline
2254: * $p^T_{miss}$ & $>$ 10 \GeV & $>$ 20 \GeV & $>$ 20 \GeV\\\hline
2255: \end{tabular}
2256: \caption{Selection criteria for $\lambda'_{ijk}$ chargino
2257: selections with a multijet topology, missing energy and no isolated
2258: leptons, as presented in Table \ref{tab:topologies_lqd}.
2259: Different selection criteria are developed according to the mass values of the pair--produced charginos.}
2260: \label{tab:lambdaprime_sel5}
2261: \end{center}
2262: \end{table*}
2263:
2264: %\clearpage
2265: \begin{table*}
2266: \begin{center}
2267: \begin{tabular}{|l|c|}
2268: \hline
2269: \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{$\lambda'_{ijk}: \;$
2270: multijets + lepton(s) and $\Emiss$ }\\\hline
2271: $N_{clusters}$ & $ \geq$ 13 \\\hline
2272: $N_{tracks}$ & $ \geq$ 10 \\\hline
2273: $E_{v12}/E_{vis}$ & $ <$ 0.30 \\\hline
2274: sin($\theta_{T}$) &$ >$0.139 \\\hline
2275: $E_{par}/E_{vis}$ & $ <$0.5 \\\hline
2276: $E_{perp}/E_{vis}$ & $ <$0.2 \\\hline
2277: $N_{jets8}$ & $ \geq$ 3 \\\hline
2278: $E_{vis}/\sqrt{s}$ & $<$0.9 \\\hline
2279: sin($\theta_{miss}$) & $ >$0.436 \\\hline
2280: $N_{e,\mu}$ & $ \geq$ 1, one isolated ($E_{20}^{\ell} <$
2281: 1 \GeV, $E_{lepton}<$ 30 \GeV) \\\hline
2282: W mass window & reject if 70 \gev $< M_{qq}<$ 90 \gev \\
2283: & and 70 \gev $< M_{\ell\nu} <$ 90 \gev \\\hline
2284: * ${\it Thrust}$ & 0.56--0.87 \\\hline
2285: * ln($y_{34}$) & $>-5.35$ \\\hline
2286: * ln($y_{45}$) & $>-6.22$ \\\hline
2287: * $p^T_{miss}$ & $> 12.3$ \GeV \\\hline
2288: \end{tabular}
2289: \caption{Values of the selection requirements
2290: for $\lambda'_{ijk}$ chargino
2291: selections with a multijet topology with both lepton(s) and missing energy.}
2292: \label{tab:lambdaprime_sel6}
2293: \end{center}
2294: \end{table*}
2295:
2296:
2297:
2298:
2299:
2300:
2301: %\clearpage
2302: \begin{table*}
2303: \begin{center}
2304: \begin{tabular}{|l|c|} \hline
2305: \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{$\lambda'_{ijk}: \;$
2306: scalar electrons } \cr \hline
2307:
2308: $N_{clusters}$ & {$\geq$ 13} \\ \hline
2309: $N_{tracks}$ & {$\geq$ 1 } \\ \hline
2310: ${E_{vis}}/{\sqrt{s}}$ & {$>$ 0.70 } \\ \hline
2311: ${E_{perp}}/{E_{vis}}$ & {$<$ 0.20 } \\ \hline
2312: ${E_{par}}/{E_{vis}}$ & {$<$ 0.20 } \\ \hline
2313: ${E_{v12}}/{E_{vis}}$ & {$<$ 0.30 } \\ \hline
2314: ${E_{bgo}}/{E_{vis}}$ & {0.05 -- 0.98 } \\ \hline
2315: ${\rtsp}/{\rts}$ & {$>$ 0.80 } \\ \hline
2316: sin$(\theta_{T})$ & {$>$ 0.139 } \\ \hline
2317: ${\it Thrust}$ & $<$ 0.95 \\ \hline
2318: ln($\ytq$) & $> -8.0$ \\ \hline
2319: ln($\yqc$) & $> -9.0$ \\ \hline
2320: %
2321: $N_{e}$ & $\geq 1 $ \\ \hline
2322: $E_1^{\ell}$ (\gev) & $>$ 5 \\ \hline
2323:
2324: \end{tabular}
2325: \caption{Selection criteria of the scalar electron selections,
2326: for final states
2327: with 4 jets, 2 to 4 leptons and possible missing energy, as shown in
2328: Table \ref{tab:topologies_lqd}.}
2329: \label{tab:lambdaprime_sel7}
2330: \end{center}
2331: \end{table*}
2332:
2333:
2334:
2335:
2336:
2337:
2338: %\clearpage
2339: \begin{table*}
2340: \begin{center}
2341: \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline
2342:
2343: \multicolumn{6}{|c|} {$\lambda''_{ijk}: \;$
2344: multijets } \cr \hline
2345:
2346:
2347:
2348: $N_{clusters}$ & \multicolumn{5}{|c|} {$\geq$ 13} \\ \hline
2349: $N_{tracks}$ & \multicolumn{5}{|c|} {$\geq$ 1 } \\ \hline
2350: ${E_{vis}}/{\sqrt{s}}$ & \multicolumn{5}{|c|} {$>$ 0.70 } \\ \hline
2351: ${E_{perp}}/{E_{vis}}$ & \multicolumn{5}{|c|} {$<$ 0.20 } \\ \hline
2352: ${E_{par}}/{E_{vis}}$ & \multicolumn{5}{|c|} {$<$ 0.20 } \\ \hline
2353: ${E_{v12}}/{E_{vis}}$ & \multicolumn{5}{|c|} {$<$ 0.30 } \\ \hline
2354: ${E_{bgo}}/{E_{vis}}$ & \multicolumn{5}{|c|} {0.05 -- 0.98 } \\ \hline
2355: ${\rtsp}/{\rts}$ & \multicolumn{5}{|c|} {$>$ 0.80 } \\ \hline
2356: sin$(\theta_{T})$ & \multicolumn{5}{|c|} {$>$ 0.139 } \\ \hline
2357: %
2358: \mch (\gev) & 20 -- 30 & 30 -- 40 & 40 -- 50 & 50 -- 60 & $\geq$ 60 \\ \hline
2359: * ${\it Thrust}$ & 0.940 -- 0.973 & 0.901 -- 0.960 & 0.828 -- 0.919 & 0.755 -- 0.889
2360: & 0.575 -- 0.844 \\ \hline
2361: * ln($\ytq$) & $> -5.85$ & $> -5.70$ & $> -5.20$ & $> -5.16$ & $> -4.77$ \\ \hline
2362: * ln($\yqc$) & $> -9.68$ & $> -7.02$ & $> -6.16$ & $> -5.82$ & $> -4.62$ \\ \hline
2363: * $W_{jet1}$ & 0.12 -- 0.22 & 0.15 -- 0.45 & 0.25 -- 0.55 & 0.21 -- 0.67
2364: & 0.38 -- 0.90 \\ \hline
2365:
2366: \end{tabular}
2367: \caption{Cut values of the neutralino selections, for final
2368: states with at least six hadronic jets. The same multijet topologies
2369: arise from indirect neutralino and chargino hadronic decays,
2370: as presented in Table~\ref{tab:topologies_udd}.
2371: Different selection criteria are developed according to the
2372: mass values of the pair-produced supersymmetric particles. }
2373: \label{tab:lambdasec_sel1}
2374: \end{center}
2375: \end{table*}
2376:
2377: %\clearpage
2378: \begin{table*}
2379: \begin{center}
2380: \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|}\hline
2381:
2382: \multicolumn{3}{|c|} {$\lambda''_{ijk}: \;$
2383: multijets + lepton(s) }\cr\hline
2384:
2385:
2386: $N_{clusters}$ & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{$ \geq$ 13} \\ \hline
2387: $E_{v12}/E_{vis}$ & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$ <$ 0.20} \\ \hline
2388: $E_{bgo}/E_{vis}$ & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{0.05--0.98} \\ \hline
2389: sin($\theta_{T}$) & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$ >$0.139} \\ \hline
2390: %
2391: & semileptonic & leptonic \\\hline
2392: $E_{par}/E_{vis}$ & $<0.3$ & $<0.5$ \\\hline
2393: $E_{perp}/E_{vis}$ & $<0.3$ & $<0.5$ \\\hline
2394: $ N_{tracks}$ & $>20$ & 10--30 \\\hline
2395: $N_{e,\mu,\tau}$ & $\geq 1$ & $\geq 2$ \\\hline
2396: $E_{20}^{\ell}$ & $> 1$ \GeV & -- \\\hline
2397:
2398: * ${\it Thrust}$ & 0.52--0.83 & 0.55--0.79 \\\hline
2399: * ln($\ytq$) & $>-4.55 $&$>-4.15$ \\\hline
2400: * ln($\yqc$) & $>-5.02$ & $>-4.58$ \\\hline
2401: * sin($\theta_{miss}$) & $>0.24$ & $>0.51$ \\\hline
2402: * $E_{vis}/{\sqrt{s}}$& $>0.6$ & 0.52--0.88 \\\hline
2403: \end{tabular}
2404: \caption{Details of final selections for semileptonic and leptonic decays channels of the charginos for the $\lambda''$ coupling, as listed in Table \ref{tab:topologies_udd}.}
2405: \label{tab:lambdasec_sel2}
2406: \end{center}
2407: \end{table*}
2408:
2409: %\clearpage
2410: \begin{table*}[ht]
2411: \begin{center}
2412: \begin{tabular}{|l|l|} \hline
2413:
2414: \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{$\lambda''_{ijk}: \;$
2415: scalar leptons}\cr\hline
2416:
2417: $\serr$ & 2 electrons.
2418: For at least one of them: $E_{20}^{\ell} > 1$ \GeV \\ \hline
2419: $\smur$ & 2 muons.
2420: For at least one of them: $E_{20}^{\ell} > 1$ \GeV \\ \hline
2421: $\staur$ & {1 lepton (e, $\mu$, $\tau$)} \\ \hline
2422: $\staur$ with high $\Delta M$ & {1 lepton (e, $\mu$, $\tau$)} and
2423: $M_{5C} = M_{\tilde{\tau}_R} \pm 5$ \GeV.\\\hline
2424: \end{tabular}
2425: \caption{Cut values, in addition to the ``multijets'' requirements,
2426: of the scalar lepton selections (Table~\ref{tab:lambdasec_sel1}), for final states
2427: with 6 jets and 2 leptons, as shown in
2428: Table \ref{tab:topologies_udd}.
2429: Different selection criteria are developed according to the
2430: lepton flavour expected in the final state.}
2431: \label{tab:lambdasec_sel3}
2432: \end{center}
2433: \end{table*}
2434:
2435:
2436:
2437:
2438: \end{document}
2439:
2440:
2441:
2442:
2443:
2444:
2445:
2446:
2447:
2448:
2449:
2450:
2451:
2452:
2453:
2454:
2455:
2456:
2457:
2458:
2459:
2460:
2461:
2462:
2463:
2464:
2465:
2466:
2467:
2468:
2469:
2470:
2471:
2472:
2473:
2474:
2475:
2476:
2477:
2478:
2479:
2480:
2481:
2482:
2483:
2484:
2485:
2486:
2487:
2488:
2489:
2490:
2491:
2492:
2493:
2494:
2495: