1: \section{DIRC}
2: \label{sec:drc}
3: %
4: % DIRC chapter
5: %
6: % Editor: J. Schwiening, jochen@slac.stanford.edu
7: %
8: % Last update: Mar-01-22 Joe
9: %
10: \newcommand{\dirc}{DIRC}
11:
12: \subsection{Purpose and Design Requirements}
13:
14: The study of \emph{CP}-violation requires the ability to tag the
15: flavor of one of the $B$ mesons via the cascade decay
16: $b\rightarrow c \rightarrow s$, while fully reconstructing the
17: second B decay. The momenta of the kaons used for flavor tagging
18: extend up to about 2\ GeV$/c$, with most of them below 1\ GeV$/c$.
19: On the other hand, pions and kaons from the rare two-body decays
20: $B^0\rightarrow \pi^+\pi^-$ and $ B^0 \to K^+ \pi^-$ must be
21: well-separated. They have momenta between 1.7 and 4.2\ GeV/$c$
22: with a strong momentum-polar angle correlation of the tracks
23: (higher momenta occur at more forward angles because of the
24: c.m. system boost)~\cite{R_PBook}.
25:
26: The \emph{Particle Identification} (PID) system should be thin and
27: uniform in terms of radiation lengths (to minimize degradation of
28: the calorimeter energy resolution) and small in the radial
29: dimension to reduce the volume, and hence, the cost of the
30: calorimeter. Finally, for operation at high luminosity, the PID
31: system needs fast signal response, and should be able to tolerate
32: high backgrounds.
33:
34: The PID system being used in \babar\ is a new kind of ring-imaging
35: Cherenkov detector called the \dirc\ \cite{four} (the acronym
36: \dirc\ stands for \emph{Detector of Internally Reflected
37: Cherenkov} light). It is expected to be able to provide $\pi/K$
38: separation of $\sim 4~\sigma$ or greater, for all tracks from
39: $B$-meson decays from the pion Cherenkov threshold up to 4.2\
40: GeV/c. PID below 700\ MeV/c relies primarily on the $dE/dx$
41: measurements in the DCH and SVT.
42:
43: \subsection{DIRC Concept}
44:
45: The \dirc\ is based on the principle that the magnitudes of angles
46: are maintained upon reflection from a flat surface.
47: Figure~\ref{\secname fig:princip} shows a schematic of the \dirc\
48: geometry that illustrates the principles of light production,
49: transport, and imaging. The radiator material of the \dirc\ is
50: synthetic, fused silica in the form of long, thin bars with
51: rectangular cross section. These bars serve both as radiators and
52: as light pipes for the portion of the light trapped in the
53: radiator by total internal reflection. Fused, synthetic silica
54: (Spectrosil~\cite{six}) is chosen because of its resistance to
55: ionizing radiation, its long attenuation length, large index of
56: refraction, low chromatic dispersion within the wavelength
57: acceptance of the \dirc, and because it allows an excellent
58: optical finish on the surfaces of the bars~\cite{quartzpaper}.
59:
60: In the following, the variable $\theta_c$ is used to designate the
61: Cherenkov angle, $\phi_c$ denotes the azimuthal angle of a
62: Cherenkov photon around the track direction, and $n$ represents
63: the mean index of refraction of fused silica ($n = 1.473$), with
64: the familiar relation $\cos \theta_c = 1/n\beta \ (\beta = v/c, \
65: v = $ velocity of the particle, $c = $ velocity of light).
66:
67: For particles with $\beta \approx 1$, some photons will always lie
68: within the total internal reflection limit, and will be
69: transported to either one or both ends of the bar, depending on
70: the particle incident angle. To avoid instrumenting both ends of
71: the bar with photon detectors, a mirror is placed at the forward
72: end, perpendicular to the bar axis, to reflect incident photons to
73: the backward, instrumented end.
74:
75:
76: \begin{figure}
77: \includegraphics[width=7.5cm]{8524A06}
78: \vspace{-2pc}
79:
80: \caption{Schematics of the \dirc\ fused silica
81: radiator bar and imaging region. Not shown is a 6\mrad\ angle on
82: the bottom surface of the wedge (see text). } \label{\secname
83: fig:princip}
84: \end{figure}
85:
86: Once photons arrive at the instrumented end, most of them emerge
87: into a water-filled expansion region, called the \emph{standoff
88: box}. A fused silica \emph{wedge} at the exit of the bar reflects
89: photons at large angles relative to the bar axis. It thereby
90: reduces the size of the required detection surface and recovers
91: those photons that would otherwise be lost due to internal
92: reflection at the fused silica/water interface. The photons are
93: detected by an array of densely packed photomultiplier tubes
94: (PMTs), each surrounded by reflecting \emph{light catcher}
95: cones~\cite{lightcatcher} to capture light which would otherwise
96: miss the active area of the PMT. The PMTs are placed at a distance
97: of about 1.2\ m from the bar end. The expected Cherenkov light
98: pattern at this surface is essentially a conic section, where the
99: cone opening-angle is the Cherenkov production angle modified by
100: refraction at the exit from the fused silica window.
101:
102: The \dirc\ is intrinsically a three-dimensional imaging device,
103: using the position and arrival time of the PMT signals. Photons
104: generated in a bar are focused onto the phototube detection
105: surface via a ``pinhole'' defined by the exit aperture of the bar.
106: In order to associate the photon signals with a track traversing a
107: bar, the vector pointing from the center of the bar end to the
108: center of each PMT is taken as a measure of the photon propagation
109: angles $\alpha_x, \alpha_y$, and $\alpha_z$. Since the track
110: position and angles are known from the tracking system, the three
111: $\alpha$ angles can be used to determine the two Cherenkov angles
112: $\theta_c$ and $\phi_c$. In addition, the arrival time of the
113: signal provides an independent measurement of the propagation of
114: the photon, and can be related to the propagation angles $\alpha$.
115: This over-constraint on the angles and the signal timing are
116: particularly useful in dealing with ambiguities in the signal
117: association (see Section \ref{sec:drcreco}) and high background
118: rates.
119:
120: \subsection{Mechanical Design\\ and Physical Description}
121:
122: The \dirc\ bars are arranged in a 12-sided polygonal barrel.
123: Because of the beam energy asymmetry, particles are produced
124: preferentially forward in the detector. To minimize interference
125: with other detector systems in the forward region, the \dirc\
126: photon detector is placed at the backward end.
127:
128: The principal components of the \dirc\ are shown schematically in
129: Figure~\ref{\secname fig:mechelmsa}. The bars are placed into 12
130: hermetically sealed containers, called \emph{bar boxes}, made of
131: very thin aluminum-hexcel panels. Each bar box, shown in
132: Figure~\ref{\secname fig:mechelmsb}, contains 12 bars, for a total
133: of 144 bars. Within a bar box the 12 bars are optically isolated
134: by a $\sim 150\mu m$ air gap between neighboring bars, enforced by
135: custom shims made from aluminum foil.
136:
137: The bars are 17 mm-thick, 35 mm-wide, and 4.9 m-long. Each bar is
138: assembled from four 1.225 m pieces that are glued end-to-end; this
139: length is the longest high-quality bar currently
140: obtainable~\cite{quartzpaper,eight}.
141:
142: The bars are supported at 600 mm intervals by small nylon buttons
143: for optical isolation from the bar box. Each bar has a fused
144: silica wedge glued to it at the readout end. The wedge, made of
145: the same material as the bar, is 91 mm-long with very nearly the
146: same width as the bars (33 mm) and a trapezoidal profile (27
147: mm-high at bar end, and 79 mm at the light exit end). The bottom
148: of the wedge (see Figure~\ref{\secname fig:princip}) has a slight
149: ($\sim 6$\mrad) upward slope to minimize the displacement of the
150: downward reflected image due to the finite bar thickness. The
151: twelve wedges in a bar box are glued to a common 10 mm-thick fused
152: silica window, that provides the interface and seal to the
153: purified water in the standoff box.
154:
155: The mechanical support of the \dirc, shown in Figure~\ref{\secname
156: fig:mechelmsa}, is cantilevered from the steel of the IFR. The
157: \emph{Strong Support Tube} (SST) is a steel cylinder located
158: inside the end doors of the IFR and provides the basic support for
159: the entire \dirc. In turn, the SST is supported by a steel
160: \emph{support gusset} that fixes it to the barrel magnet steel. It
161: also minimizes the magnetic flux gap caused by the \dirc\ bars
162: extending through the flux return, and supports the axial load of
163: the inner magnetic plug surrounding the beam in this region.
164:
165: \begin{figure}
166: \centering
167: \includegraphics[width=6cm]{NewDirc-cmyk.eps}
168:
169: \vspace{-2pc}
170: \caption{Exploded view of the \dirc\ mechanical
171: support structure. The steel magnetic shield is not shown.}
172: \label{\secname fig:mechelmsa}
173: \end{figure}
174:
175:
176: \begin{figure}
177: \centering
178: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{barbox_new}
179: \vspace{-2pc}
180: \caption{Schematics of the \dirc\ bar box assembly.}
181: \label{\secname fig:mechelmsb}
182: \end{figure}
183:
184: The bar boxes are supported in the active region
185: by an aluminum tube, the \emph{Central Support Tube} (CST), attached to the
186: SST via an aluminum transition flange. The CST is a thin,
187: double-walled, cylindrical shell, using aircraft-type construction
188: with stressed aluminum skins and bulkheads having riveted or glued
189: joints. The CST also provides the support for the DCH.
190:
191: \begin{figure*}
192: \centering
193: \includegraphics[width=12 cm]{Fig6nb}
194: \vspace{-2pc} \caption{Elevation view of the nominal \dirc\ system
195: geometry. For clarity, the end plug is not shown. All dimensions
196: are given in mm.} \label{\secname fig:geoview1}
197: \end{figure*}
198:
199: The standoff box is made of stainless steel, consisting of a cone,
200: cylinder, and 12 sectors of PMTs. It contains about 6,000 liters
201: of purified water. Water is used to fill this region because it is
202: inexpensive and has an average index of refraction ($n \approx
203: 1.346$) reasonably close to that of fused silica, thus minimizing
204: the total internal reflection at silica-water interface.
205: Furthermore, its chromaticity index is a close match to that of
206: fused silica, effectively eliminating dispersion at the
207: silica-water interface. The steel gusset supports the standoff
208: box. A steel shield, supplemented by a \emph{bucking coil},
209: surrounds the standoff box to reduce the field in the PMT region
210: to below 1 Gauss~\cite{bfield}.
211:
212:
213: The PMTs at the rear of the standoff box lie on a surface that is
214: approximately toroidal. Each of the 12 PMT sectors contains 896
215: PMTs (ETL model 9125 \cite{nine,drcpmt}) with 29\ mm-diameter, in
216: a closely packed array inside the water volume. A double o-ring
217: water seal is made between the PMTs and the wall of the standoff
218: box. The PMTs are installed from the inside of the standoff box
219: and connected via a feed-through to a base mounted outside. The
220: hexagonal light catcher cone is mounted in front of the
221: photocathode of each PMT, which results in an effective active
222: surface area light collection fraction of about 90\%. The geometry
223: of the \dirc\ is shown in Figures~\ref{\secname fig:geoview1} and
224: \ref{\secname fig:geoview2}.
225:
226: \begin{figure}
227: \includegraphics[width=7.5 cm]{Fig1nb}
228: \vspace{-2.5pc}
229:
230: \caption{Transverse section of the nominal \dirc\
231: bar box imbedded in the CST. All dimensions are given in mm.}
232: \label{\secname fig:geoview2}
233: \end{figure}
234:
235: The \dirc\ occupies 80\ mm of radial space in the central detector
236: volume including supports and construction tolerances, with a
237: total of about 17\%\ radiation length thickness at normal
238: incidence. The radiator bars subtend a solid angle corresponding
239: to about 94\%\ of the azimuth and 83\%\ of the c.m. polar angle
240: cosine.
241:
242: The distance from the end of the bar to the PMTs is $\sim 1.17$\
243: m, which together with the size of the bars and PMTs, gives a
244: geometric contribution to the single photon Cherenkov angle
245: resolution of $\sim 7$\mrad. This value is slightly larger than
246: the rms spread of the photon production (dominated by a $\sim
247: 5.4$\mrad\ chromatic term) and transmission dispersions. The
248: overall single photon resolution is estimated to be about 10\mrad.
249:
250: \subsubsection{Cherenkov Photon Detection\\ Efficiency}
251:
252: Figure \ref{\secname fig:lightbudget} shows the contribution of
253: various optical and electronic components of the \dirc\ to the
254: Cherenkov photon detection efficiency as a function of
255: wavelength. The data points pertain to a particle entering the
256: center of the bar at 90\degrees. A typical design goal for the
257: photon transport in the bar was that no single component should
258: contribute more than 10--20\% loss of detection efficiency.
259: Satisfying this criterion required an extremely high internal
260: reflection coefficient of the bar surfaces (greater than 0.9992
261: per bounce), so that about 80\% of the light is maintained after
262: multiple bounces along the bars (365 bounces in the example of
263: Figure~\ref{\secname fig:lightbudget}). The ultraviolet cut-off is
264: at $\sim 300$\ nm, determined by the epoxy
265: (\mbox{Epotek~301-2~\cite{epotek}}) used to glue the fused silica
266: bars together. The dominant contributor to the overall detection
267: efficiency is the quantum efficiency of the PMT. Taking into
268: account additional wavelength independent factors, such as the PMT
269: packing fraction and the geometrical efficiency for trapping
270: Cherenkov photons in the fused silica bars via total internal
271: reflection, the expected number of photoelectrons $(N_{pe})$ is
272: $\sim 28$ for a $\beta=1$ particle entering normal to the surface
273: at the center of a bar, and increases by over a factor of two in
274: the forward and backward directions.
275:
276: \begin{figure}
277: \includegraphics[width=7.5 cm]{light}
278: \vspace{-2pc} \caption{Transmission, reflectivity and quantum
279: efficiency for various components of the \dirc\ as a function of
280: wavelength for a $\beta=1$ particle at normal incidence to the
281: center of a bar~\cite{jjv99}.} \label{\secname fig:lightbudget}
282: \end{figure}
283:
284:
285: \subsubsection{DIRC Water System}
286: The \dirc\ water system is designed to maintain good transparency
287: at wavelengths as small as 300\ nm. One way to achieve this is to
288: use ultra-pure, de-ionized water, close to the theoretical limit
289: of 18\ M$\Omega$cm resistivity. In addition, the water must be
290: de-gassed and the entire system kept free of bacteria. Purified
291: water is aggressive in attacking many materials, and those in
292: contact with the water were selected based on known compatability
293: with purified water. To maintain the necessary level of water
294: quality, most plumbing components are made of stainless steel or
295: polyvinylidene fluoride.
296:
297: The system contains an input line with six mechanical filters
298: (three 10\ $\mu$m, two 5\ $\mu$m, and one 1\ $\mu$m), a reverse
299: osmosis unit, de-ionization beds, a Teflon microtube de-gasser and
300: various pumps and valves. To prevent bacteria growth, it is
301: equipped with a UV lamp (254\ nm wavelength) and filters (two 1\
302: $\mu$m, two 0.2\ $\mu$m, and charcoal filters). Sampling ports are
303: provided to check the water quality and to monitor resistivity,
304: pH-value, temperature, and flow. A gravity feed return system
305: prevents overpressure. The entire standoff box water volume can be
306: recirculated up to four times a day.
307:
308: The operating experience with the water system so far has been
309: very good. The water volume is exchanged every ten hours and the
310: resistivity of the water is typically 18\ M$\Omega$cm in the
311: supply line and 8--10\ M$\Omega$cm in the return line at a
312: temperature of about 23--26\degc. The pH-value is about 6.5 and
313: 6.6-6.7 in the supply and return water, respectively. The water
314: transparency is routinely measured using lasers of three different
315: wavelengths. The transmission is better than 92\% per meter at
316: 266~nm and exceeds 98\% per meter at 325\ nm and 442\ nm.
317:
318: Potential leaks from the water seals between the bar boxes and
319: the standoff box are detected by a water leak detection system of
320: 20 custom water sensors in and about the bar box slots. Two
321: commercial ultrasonic flow sensors are used to monitor water flow
322: in two (normally dry) drain lines in addition to the 12 humidity
323: sensors on a nitrogen gas output line from each bar box (see
324: below). Should water be detected, a valve in a 100\ mm diameter
325: drain line is opened, and the entire system is drained in about 12
326: minutes.
327:
328: All elements inside the standoff box (PMT, plastic PMT housing,
329: gaskets, light catchers) were tested at normal and elevated
330: temperatures to withstand the highly corrosive action of
331: ultra-pure water and to prevent its pollution. For instance,
332: rhodium-plated mirrors on ULTEM support had to be used for the
333: light catchers~\cite{lightcatcher}.
334:
335:
336: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% end Al %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
337: \subsubsection{DIRC Gas System}
338: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% begin Rich %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
339: Nitrogen gas from liquid nitrogen boil-off is used to prevent
340: moisture from condensing on the bars, and used also to detect
341: water leaks. The gas flows through each bar box at the rate of
342: 100--200 cm$^{3}$/min, and is monitored for humidity to ensure
343: that the water seal around the bar box remains tight. The gas is
344: filtered through a molecular sieve and three mechanical filters to
345: remove particulates (7 $\mu$m, 0.5 $\mu$m, and 0.01 $\mu$m). Dew
346: points of the gas returned from the bar boxes are about -40\degc.
347: Approximately one third of the input nitrogen gas leaks from the
348: bar boxes and keeps the bar box slots in the mechanical support
349: structure free of condensation.
350:
351: \subsection{Electronics}
352: \subsubsection{DIRC PMT Electronics}
353: The \dirc\ PMT base contains a single printed circuit board,
354: equipped with surface mounted components. The operating high
355: voltage (HV) of the PMTs is $\sim~1.14$ kV, with a range between
356: 0.9 and 1.3 kV. Groups of 16 tubes are selected for uniformity of
357: gain to allow their operation at a common HV provided from a
358: single distribution board.
359:
360: The HV is provided by a CAEN SY-527 high voltage distribution
361: system. Each of the 12 sectors receives HV through 56 high voltage
362: channels, distributed through a single cable bundle. Each voltage
363: can be set between 0 and 1.6 kV.
364:
365: \subsubsection{DIRC Front-End Electronics}
366:
367: The DIRC front-end electronics (FEE) is designed to measure the
368: arrival time of each Cherenkov photon detected by the PMT
369: array~\cite{drcFee} to an accuracy that is limited by the
370: intrinsic 1.5 ns transit time spread of the PMTs. The design
371: contains a pipeline to deal with the L1 trigger latency of
372: $12\mu\,$s, and can handle random background rates of up to 200
373: kHz/PMT with zero dead time. In addition, the pulse height spectra
374: can be measured to ensure that the PMTs operate on the HV plateau.
375: However, because the ADC information is not needed to reconstruct
376: events, 64 PMTs are multiplexed onto a single ADC for monitoring
377: and calibration.
378:
379: The \dirc\ FEE is mounted on the outside of the standoff box and
380: is highly integrated in order to minimize cable lengths and to
381: retain the required single photoelectron sensitivity. Each of the
382: 168 \dirc\ \emph{Front-end Boards} (DFBs) processes 64 PMT inputs,
383: containing eight custom analog chips along with their associated
384: level translators, four custom-made TDC ICs, one 8-bit flash ADC
385: (FADC), two digitally controlled calibration signal generators,
386: multi-event buffers, and test hardware.
387:
388: The PMT signals are amplified, and pulse-shaped by an
389: eight-channel analog IC~\cite{analogchip}. A digital pulse timed
390: with the peak of the input pulse is output by a zero-crossing
391: discriminator, as well as a pulse shaped by a CR-RC filter with
392: 80\ ns peaking time, which was chosen to allow for the ADC
393: multiplexing. The multiplexer selects the channel to be digitized
394: by the FADC for calibration.
395:
396:
397: The TDC IC~\cite{tdc} is a 16-channel TDC with 0.5~ns binning,
398: input buffering, and selective readout of the data in time with
399: the trigger. To cope with the L1 maximum trigger latency of
400: 12~$\mu{\rm s}$ and jitter of 1$\mus$, the selective readout
401: process extracts data in time with the trigger within a
402: programmable time window. The acceptance window width is
403: programmable between 64~ns and 2~$\mus$ and is
404: typically set at 600~ns. The twelve DIRC Crate Controllers (DCCs)
405: that form the interface to the VME front-end crates are connected
406: to six ROMs via 1.2~Gbit/s optical fibers.
407:
408: \subsubsection{DAQ Feature Extraction}
409: Raw data from the DFBs are processed in the ROMs by a feature
410: extraction algorithm before being transmitted to the segment and
411: event builder. This software algorithm reduces the data volume by
412: roughly 50\% under typical background conditions. DFB data that
413: contain errors are flagged and discarded. The only data errors
414: seen to date have been traced to damaged DFBs that were replaced
415: immediately. Because the dataflow system can reliably transmit at
416: most 32 kBytes/crate, the feature extraction must sometimes
417: truncate data to limit the event size. Event data are replaced
418: with a per-DFB occupancy summary when a ROM's hit occupancy
419: exceeds 56\%, which occurs about once in $10^{4}$ events. An
420: appropriate flag is inserted into the feature extraction output
421: whenever truncation or deletion occurs. Errors, truncation, and
422: feature extraction performance are continuously monitored online,
423: and exceptions are either immediately corrected or logged for
424: future action.
425:
426: \subsubsection{DIRC Calibration}
427: The \dirc\ uses two independent approaches for a calibration of
428: the unknown PMT time response and the delays introduced by the FEE
429: and the fast control system. The first is a conventional pulser
430: calibration. The second uses reconstructed tracks from collision
431: data.
432:
433: The pulser calibration is performed online using a light pulser
434: system which generates precisely timed 1 ns duration light pulses
435: from twelve, blue LEDs, one per sector. The LEDs are triggered by
436: the global fast control calibration strobe command sent to the
437: DCCs. The DCC triggers an individual LED for each sector upon
438: receipt of calibration strobe. Pulses in adjacent sectors are
439: staggered by 50 ns to prevent light crosstalk between sectors. The
440: pulser is run at roughly 2 kHz for the time delay calibration. The
441: LED light is transmitted through approximately 47 m-long optical
442: fibers to diffusers mounted on the inner surface of the standoff
443: box wall opposite the PMTs. This light produces about 10\%
444: photoelectron occupancy nearly uniformly throughout the standoff
445: box.
446:
447: Histograms of TDC times for each PMT are accumulated in parallel
448: in the ROMs, and then fit to an asymmetric peak function. About
449: 65,000 light pulses are used to determine the mean time delay of
450: each of the PMTs in the standoff box to a statistical accuracy of
451: better than 0.1 ns. The LED pulser is also used to monitor the
452: phototube gains using the ADC readout. As with the TDC
453: calibration, histograms and fits of the ADC spectrum are
454: accumulated and fit in the ROM. A calibration run including both
455: TDC and ADC information for all PMTs requires a few minutes, and
456: is run once per day. Daily calibrations not only verify the time
457: delays, but allow the detection of hardware failures.
458:
459: The data stream calibration uses reconstructed tracks from the
460: collision data. For calibration of the global time delay, the
461: observed, uncalibrated times minus the expected arrival times,
462: $\Delta t_\gamma$, are collected during the online prompt
463: reconstruction processing. To calculate individual channel
464: calibrations, $\Delta t_\gamma$ values for each \dirc\ channel are
465: accumulated until statistics equivalent to 100,000 tracks are
466: collected. The distribution for each channel is fit to extract the
467: global time offset calibration.
468:
469: The data stream and online pulser calibrations of the electronic
470: delays, and of the PMT time response and gain yield fully
471: consistent results, although the data stream results in 15\%
472: better timing resolution than the pulser calibration. The time
473: delay values per channel are typically stable to an $rms$ of less
474: than 0.1\ ns over more than one year of daily calibrations.
475:
476:
477:
478: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% begin Al %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
479:
480:
481: \subsubsection{DIRC Environmental Monitoring\\ System}
482:
483: The \dirc\ environmental monitoring system is divided into three
484: parts, corresponding to three separate tasks. The first deals with
485: the control and monitoring of the HV system for the PMTs. The
486: second is devoted to monitoring low voltages related to the FEE.
487: The third controls a variety of other detector parameter settings.
488: An interlock system, based on a standard VME module (SIAM), is
489: provided. For the purposes of the \dirc, three dedicated VME CPUs
490: run the application code. The communication between the HV
491: mainframes and the monitoring crate is achieved by a CAENET
492: controller (V288). The HV monitor task controls the step sizes for
493: ramping the HV up or down, as well as the communication of alarm
494: conditions, and the values and limits for the HV and current of
495: each channel.
496:
497: The purpose of FEE monitoring is to control and monitor parameters
498: related to the FEE. For each \dirc\ sector, a custom multi-purpose
499: board, the DCC, equipped with a micro-controller
500: \cite{drcDCCmicrocontroler} incorporating the appropriate
501: communication protocol (CANbus), is situated in the same crate as
502: the DFB. All monitoring and control tasks are implemented on this
503: card. The parameters monitored are the low voltages for the DFBs
504: and DCCs, the status of the optical link (Finisar), the
505: temperature on supply boards, and the VME crate status.
506:
507: The third part of the monitoring system is based on a custom ADC
508: VME board (VSAM), used to monitor various type of sensors:
509: magnetic field sensors, an ensemble of 12 beam monitoring scalers,
510: 16 CsI radiation monitors, the water level in the standoff box as
511: well as its pH-value, resistivity, and temperature.
512:
513: \subsection{Operational Issues}
514:
515: \begin{figure*} %% TWO-COLUMN figure
516: \centerline{
517: \includegraphics[width=7.5 cm]{event}\hspace{1pc}
518: \includegraphics[width=7.5 cm]{event_dtcut}}
519: \vspace{-2pc}
520: \caption{Display of an $e^+e^-\rightarrow\mu^+\mu^-$ event
521: reconstructed in \babar\ with two different time cuts. On the
522: left, all \dirc\ PMTs with signals within the $\pm$300 ns trigger
523: window are shown. On the right, only those PMTs with signals
524: within 8 ns of the expected Cherenkov photon arrival time are
525: displayed.} \label{\secname fig:event}
526: \end{figure*}
527:
528: The \dirc\ was successfully commissioned and attained performance
529: close to that expected from Monte Carlo simulation. The \dirc\ has
530: been robust and stable, and, indeed, serves also as a background
531: detector for \pep2\ tuning. Figure~\ref{\secname fig:event} shows
532: a typical di-muon event ($e^{+}e^{-} \rightarrow \mu^{+}\mu^{-}$).
533: In addition to the signals caused by the Cherenkov light from the
534: two tracks, about 500 background signals can be seen in the
535: readout window of $\pm$300~ns. This background is dominated by low
536: energy photons from the \pep2\ machine hitting the standoff box.
537: Some care in machine tuning is required to stay under a noise
538: limit of about 200 kHz/tube imposed by limited DAQ throughput.
539: Lead shielding has been installed around the beam line components
540: just outside the backward endcap, and has substantially reduced
541: this background.
542:
543: After about two years of running, approximately 99.7\% of PMTs and
544: electronic channels are operating with nominal performance.
545:
546: Some deterioration of the PMT front glass windows (made of B53
547: Borosilicate glass) that are immersed in the ultra-pure water of
548: the standoff box has been observed. For most of the tubes, the
549: observable effect is typically a slight cloudiness, but for about
550: 50 tubes, it is much more pronounced. Extensive R\&D has
551: demonstrated that the effect is associated with a loss of sodium
552: and boron from the surface of the glass~\cite{IEEE2000}. For most
553: tubes, the leaching rate is a few microns per year, and is
554: expected to be acceptable for the full projected ten year lifetime
555: of the experiment. However, for the $\sim 50$ tubes, the incorrect
556: glass was used by the manufacturer. That glass does not contain
557: zinc, making it much more susceptible to rapid leaching. This
558: leaching may eventually lead to either a loss of performance, or
559: some risk of mechanical failure of the face plates for these
560: tubes. Direct measurements of the number of Cherenkov photons
561: observed in di-muon events as a function of time suggest that the
562: total loss of photons from all sources is less than 2\%/year.
563:
564: \subsection{Data Analysis and Performance}
565:
566: Figure~\ref{\secname fig:event} shows the pattern of Cherenkov
567: photons in a di-muon event, before and after reconstruction. The
568: time distribution of real Cherenkov photons from a single event is
569: of order $\sim 50$ ns wide, and during normal data-taking they are
570: accompanied by hundreds of random photons in a flat background
571: within the trigger acceptance window. Given a track pointing at a
572: particular fused silica bar and a candidate signal in a PMT within
573: the optical phase space of that bar, the Cherenkov angle is
574: determined up to a 16-fold ambiguity: top or bottom, left or
575: right, forward or backward, and wedge or no-wedge reflections. The
576: goal of the reconstruction program is to associate the correct
577: track with the candidate PMT signal, with the requirement that the
578: transit time of the photon from its creation in the bar to its
579: detection at the PMT be consistent with the measurement error of
580: $\sim 1.5$ ns.
581:
582: \subsubsection{Reconstruction\label{sec:drcreco} }
583: An unbinned maximum likelihood formalism is
584: used to incorporate all information provided by the space and time
585: measurements from the \dirc.
586:
587: The emission angle and the arrival time of the Cherenkov photons
588: are reconstructed from the observed space-time coordinates of the
589: PMT signals, transformed into the Cherenkov coordinate system
590: ($\theta_c$, $\phi_c$, and $\delta t$) as follows: The known
591: spatial position of the bar through which the track passed and the
592: PMTs whose signal times lie within the readout window of $\pm$300
593: ns from the trigger are used to calculate the three-dimensional
594: vector pointing from the center of the bar end to the center of
595: each tube. This vector is then extrapolated into the radiator bar
596: (using Snell's law). This procedure defines, up to the 16-fold
597: ambiguity described above, the angles $\theta_c$ and $\phi_c$ of a
598: photon.
599:
600: The DIRC time measurement represents the third dimension of the
601: photomultiplier hit reconstruction. The timing resolution is not
602: competitive with the position information for Cherenkov angle
603: reconstruction, but timing information is used to suppress
604: background hits from the beam induced background and, more
605: importantly, exclude other tracks in the same event as the source
606: of the photon. Timing information is also used to resolve the
607: forward-backward and wedge ambiguities in the hit-to-track
608: association.
609:
610: The relevant observable to distinguish between signal and
611: background photons is the difference between the measured and
612: expected photon arrival time, $\Delta t_\gamma$. It is calculated
613: for each photon using the track time-of-flight (assuming it to be
614: a charged pion), the measured time of the candidate signal in the
615: PMT and the photon propagation time within the bar and the water
616: filled standoff box. The time information and the requirement of
617: using only physically possible photon propagation paths reduce the
618: number of ambiguities from 16 to typically 3. Applying the time
619: information also substantially improves the correct matching of
620: photons with tracks and reduces the number of accelerator induced
621: background signals by approximately a factor 40, as illustrated in
622: Figure~\ref{\secname fig:event}.
623:
624: The reconstruction routine currently provides a likelihood value
625: for each of the five stable particle types (e,$\mu$,$\pi$,K,p) if
626: the track passes through the active volume of the \dirc . These
627: likelihoods are calculated in an iterative process by maximizing
628: the likelihood value for the entire event while testing different
629: hypotheses for each track. If enough photons are found, a fit of
630: $\theta_c$ and the number of observed signal and background
631: photons are calculated for each track.
632:
633: \subsubsection{Results}
634:
635: The parameters of expected \dirc\ performance were derived from
636: extensive studies with a variety of prototypes, culminating with a
637: full-size prototype in a beam at CERN~\cite{ten}. The test beam
638: results were well-described by Monte Carlo simulations of the
639: detector. The performance of the full detector is close to
640: expectations, and additional offline work, particularly on
641: geometrical alignment, is expected to lead to further
642: improvements.
643:
644: In the absence of correlated systematic errors, the resolution
645: ($\sigma_{C,\mathrm{track}}$) on the track Cherenkov angle should
646: scale as
647: \begin{equation}
648: \sigma_{C,\mathrm{track}} = {\sigma_{C,\gamma}\over \sqrt{N_{pe}}} ,
649: \end{equation}
650: where $\sigma_{C,\gamma}$ is the single photon Cherenkov angle
651: resolution, and $N_{pe}$ is the number of photons detected.
652: Figure~\ref{\secname fig:single}(a) shows the single photon
653: angular resolution obtained from di-muon events. There is a broad
654: background of less than 10\% relative height under the peak, that
655: originates mostly from track-associated sources, such as $\delta$
656: rays, and combinatorial background. The width of the peak
657: translates to a resolution of about 10.2\mrad, in good agreement
658: with the expected value. The measured time resolution (see
659: Figure~\ref{\secname fig:single}(b)) is 1.7\ns, close to the
660: intrinsic 1.5\ns\ transit time spread of the PMTs.
661:
662: \begin{figure}
663: \centering
664: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{thc_time_top}
665: \vspace{-2pc}
666:
667: \caption{ The difference between (a)~the measured and expected
668: Cherenkov angle for single photons, $\Delta \theta_{c,\gamma}$,
669: and (b)~the measured and expected photon arrival time, for single
670: muons in $\mu^+\mu^-$ events.} \label{\secname fig:single}
671: \end{figure}
672:
673: \begin{figure}
674: \includegraphics[width=7.5 cm]{nphot_mu}
675: \vspace*{-15mm} \caption{Number of detected photons versus track
676: polar angle for reconstructed tracks in di-muon events compared to
677: Monte Carlos simulation. The mean number of photons in the
678: simulation has been tuned to match the data.} \label{\secname
679: fig:nphot}
680: \end{figure}
681:
682: The number of photoelectrons shown in Figure~\ref{\secname
683: fig:nphot} varies between 20 for small polar angles at the center
684: of the barrel and 65 at large polar angles. This variation is well
685: reproduced by Monte Carlo simulation, and can be understood from
686: the geometry of the \dirc . The number of Cherenkov photons varies
687: with the pathlength of the track in the radiator, it is smallest
688: at perpendicular incidence at the center and increases towards the
689: ends of the bars. In addition, the fraction of photons trapped by
690: total internal reflection rises with larger values of
691: $\vert\cos\theta_{\mathrm{track}}\vert$. This increase in the
692: number of photons for forward going tracks is a good match to the
693: increase in momentum and thus benefits the \dirc\ performance.
694:
695: With the present alignment, the track Cherenkov angle resolution
696: for di-muon events is shown in Figure~\ref{\secname fig:trackres}.
697: The width of the fitted Gaussian distribution is 2.5\mrad\
698: compared to the design goal of 2.2\mrad. From the measured single
699: track resolution versus momentum in di-muon events and the
700: difference between the expected Cherenkov angles of charged pions
701: and kaons, the pion-kaon separation power of the \dirc\ can be
702: inferred. As shown in Figure~\ref{\secname fig:sep}, the expected
703: separation between kaons and pions at 3\ GeV/$c$ is about
704: $4.2\sigma$, within 15\% of the design goal.
705:
706: \begin{figure}
707: \includegraphics[width=7.5 cm]{thc_fit_dots}
708: \vspace*{-2pc}
709:
710: \caption{The difference between the measured and expected
711: Cherenkov angle, $\Delta \theta_{c,{\mathrm track}}$, for single
712: muons in $\mu^+\mu^-$ events. The curve represents a Gaussian
713: distribution fit to the data with a width of 2.5 \mrad. }
714: \label{\secname fig:trackres}
715: \end{figure}
716:
717: \begin{figure}
718: \includegraphics[width=7.5 cm]{btopipi_sep_data_new}
719: \vspace*{-2pc}
720:
721: \caption{Expected $\pi$-K separation in $B^0\rightarrow
722: \pi^+\pi^-$ events versus track momentum inferred from the
723: measured Cherenkov angle resolution and number of Cherenkov
724: photons per track in di-muon events.} \label{\secname fig:sep}
725: \end{figure}
726:
727: \begin{figure}
728: \includegraphics[width=.8\columnwidth]{d0mass_detpap_onebw.eps}
729: \vspace*{-2pc}
730:
731: \caption{Invariant K$\pi$ inclusive mass spectrum with and without
732: the use of the \dirc\ for kaon identification. The mass peak
733: corresponds to the decay of the $D^0$ particle.} \label{\secname
734: fig:kpi}
735: \end{figure}
736:
737: Figure~\ref{\secname fig:kpi} shows an example of the use of the
738: \dirc\ for particle identification. The $K\pi$ invariant mass
739: spectra are shown with and without the use of the \dirc\ for kaon
740: identification. The peak corresponds to the decay of the $D^0$
741: particle.
742:
743: The efficiency for correctly identifying a charged kaon that
744: traverses a radiator bar and the probability to wrongly identify a
745: pion as a kaon are determined using $D^0 \rightarrow K^-\pi^+$
746: decays selected kinematically from inclusive $D^{*}$ production
747: and are shown as a function of the track momentum in
748: Figure~\ref{\secname fig:kpi_eff} for a particular choice of
749: particle selection criteria. The mean kaon selection efficiency
750: and pion misidentification are $96.2 \pm 0.2$\% (stat.) and $2.1
751: \pm 0.1$\% (stat.), respectively.
752:
753: \begin{figure}
754: \includegraphics[width=7.5 cm]{keff.eps}
755: \vspace*{-2pc}
756:
757: \caption{Efficiency and misidentification probability for the
758: selection of charged kaons as a function of track momentum,
759: determined using $D^0 \rightarrow K^-\pi^+$ decays selected
760: kinematically from inclusive $D^{*}$ production.} \label{\secname
761: fig:kpi_eff}
762: \end{figure}
763:
764: \subsection{Summary}
765:
766: The \dirc\ is a novel ring-imaging Cherenkov detector that is
767: well-matched to the hadronic PID requirements of \babar . The
768: \dirc\ has been robust and stable and, two years after
769: installation, about 99.7\% of all PMTs and electronic channels are
770: operating with nominal performance. Additional shielding in the
771: standoff box tunnel region should reduce the sensitivity to
772: beam-induced backgrounds, as should faster FEE, both installed
773: during the winter 2000-2001 shutdown. At luminosities around
774: $1\times 10^{34}\cms$, the TDC IC will have to be replaced with a
775: faster version and deeper buffering. The design process for this
776: is underway.
777:
778: The detector performance achieved is rather close to that
779: predicted by the Monte Carlo simulations. Alignment and further
780: code developments are expected to further improve performance.
781: