1: \section{The PEP II Storage Rings and Their Impact on the \babar\ Detector}
2: \label{sec:ir}
3:
4: \subsection{\pep2\ Storage Rings }
5: \pep2\ is an \epem\ storage ring system designed to operate at a
6: center of mass (c.m.) energy of 10.58\gev, corresponding to the
7: mass of the \FourS\ resonance. The parameters of these energy
8: asymmetric storage rings are presented in Table~\ref{\secname
9: tab:tabpep2}. \pep2\ has surpassed its design goals, both in terms
10: of the instantaneous and the integrated daily luminosity, with
11: significantly fewer bunches than anticipated. A detailed
12: description of the design and operational experience of \pep2\ can
13: be found in references \cite{pepnim} and \cite{epac2000}.
14:
15: \begin{table}[htb]
16: \caption{\pep2\ beam parameters. Values are given both for the design and
17: for typical colliding beam operation in the first year. HER and LER
18: refer to the high energy \en\ and low energy \ep\ ring, respectively.
19: $\sigma_{Lx}$, $\sigma_{Ly}$, and $\sigma_{Lz}$ refer to the
20: horizontal, vertical, and longitudinal rms size of the luminous
21: region.}
22:
23: \vspace{\baselineskip}
24:
25: \label{\secname tab:tabpep2}
26:
27: \small
28: \begin{tabular}{lcc}
29: \hline Parameters\rule[-5pt]{0pt}{17pt} &Design &Typical\\ \hline
30: Energy HER/LER (GeV)\rule{0pt}{12pt}&9.0/3.1&9.0/3.1 \\ Current
31: HER/LER (A) &0.75/2.15 &0.7/1.3\\ \# of bunches &1658
32: &553-829\\ Bunch spacing~(ns) &4.2 &6.3-10.5\\ $\sigma_{Lx}$
33: (\mum) &110 &120\\ $\sigma_{Ly}$ (\mum) &3.3 &5.6\\ $\sigma_{Lz}$
34: (mm) &9 &9\\ Luminosity ($10^{33}$\cms) &3 &2.5\\ Luminosity
35: (\invpb/d) &135 \rule[-5pt]{0pt}{0pt}&120\\ \hline
36: \end{tabular}
37: \normalsize
38: \end{table}
39:
40:
41: \pep2\ typically operates on a 40--50 minute fill cycle. At the
42: end of each fill, it takes about three minutes to replenish the
43: beams. After a loss of the stored beams, the beams are refilled in
44: approximately 10--15 minutes. \babar\ divides the data into runs,
45: defined as periods of three hour duration or less during which
46: beam and detector conditions are judged to be stable. While most
47: of the data are recorded at the peak of the \FourS\ resonance,
48: about 12\% are taken at a c.m. energy 40\mev\ lower to allow for
49: studies of non-resonant background.
50:
51:
52: \subsection{Impact of \pep2\ on \babar\ Layout}
53:
54: The high beam currents and the large number of closely-spaced
55: bunches required to produce the high luminosity of \pep2\ tightly
56: couple the issues of detector design, interaction region layout,
57: and remediation of machine-induced background. The bunches
58: collide head-on and are separated magnetically in the horizontal
59: plane by a pair of dipole magnets (B1), followed by a series of
60: offset quadrupoles. The tapered B1 dipoles, located at $\pm$
61: 21\cm\ on either side of the IP, and the Q1 quadrupoles are
62: permanent magnets made of samarium-cobalt placed inside the field
63: of the \babar\ solenoid, while the Q2, Q4, and Q5 quadrupoles,
64: located outside or in the fringe field of the solenoid, are
65: standard iron magnets. The collision axis is off-set from the
66: $z$-axis of the \babar\ detector by about 20\mrad\ in the
67: horizontal plane \cite{sullivan97} to minimize the perturbation of
68: the beams by the solenoidal field.
69:
70: The interaction region is enclosed by a water-cooled beam pipe of
71: 27.9\mm\ outer radius, composed of two layers of beryllium (0.83~mm
72: and 0.53\mm\ thick) with a 1.48\mm\ water channel between them. To
73: attenuate synchrotron radiation, the inner surface of the pipe is
74: coated with a 4\mum\ thin layer of gold. In addition, the beam pipe is
75: wrapped with 150\mum\ of tantalum foil on either side of the IP,
76: beyond $z=+10.1$\cm\ and $z=-7.9$\cm. The total thickness of the
77: central beam pipe section at normal incidence corresponds to 1.06\% of
78: a radiation length.
79:
80: The beam pipe, the permanent magnets, and the SVT were assembled and
81: aligned, and then enclosed in a 4.5\m-long support tube which spans
82: the IP. The central section of this tube was fabricated from a
83: carbon-fiber epoxy composite with a thickness of 0.79\% of a radiation
84: length.
85:
86:
87: \subsection{Monitoring of Beam Parameters}
88:
89: The beam parameters most critical for \babar\ performance are the
90: luminosity, the energies of the two beams, and the position,
91: angles, and size of the luminous region.
92:
93: \subsubsection{Luminosity}
94:
95: While \pep2\ measures radiative Bhabha scattering to provide a
96: fast monitor of the relative luminosity for operations, \babar\
97: derives the absolute luminosity offline from other QED processes,
98: primarily \epem, and $\mu^+\mu^-$ pairs. The measured rates are
99: consistent and stable as a function of time. For a data sample of
100: 1\invfb, the statistical error is less than 1\%. The systematic
101: uncertainty on the relative changes of the luminosity is less than
102: 0.5\%, while the systematic error on the absolute value of the
103: luminosity is estimated to be about 1.5\%. This error is
104: currently dominated by uncertainties in the Monte Carlo generator
105: and the simulation of the detector. It is expected that with a
106: better understanding of the efficiency, the overall systematic
107: error on the absolute value of the luminosity will be
108: significantly reduced.
109:
110:
111: \subsubsection{Beam Energies}
112:
113: During operation, the mean energies of the two beams are calculated
114: from the total magnetic bending strength (including the effects of
115: off-axis quadrupole fields, steering magnets, and wigglers) and the
116: average deviations of the accelerating frequencies from their central
117: values. While the systematic uncertainty in the PEP-II calculation of
118: the absolute beam energies is estimated to be 5--10\mev, the relative
119: energy setting for each beam is accurate and stable to about
120: 1\mev. The rms energy spreads of the LER and HER beams are 2.3\mev\
121: and 5.5\mev, respectively.
122:
123: To ensure that data are recorded close to the peak of the \FourS\
124: resonance, the observed ratio of \BB\ enriched hadronic events to
125: lepton pair production is monitored online. Near the peak of the
126: resonance, a 2.5\% change in the \BB\ production rate corresponds
127: to a 2\mev\ change in the c.m. energy, a value that is close to
128: the tolerance to which the energy of \pep2\ can be held. However,
129: a drop in the \BB\ rate does not distinguish between energy
130: settings below or above the \FourS\ peak. The sign of the energy
131: change must be determined from other indicators. The best monitor
132: and absolute calibration of the c.m. energy is derived from the
133: measured c.m. momentum of fully reconstructed \B\ mesons combined
134: with the known $B$-meson mass. An absolute error of 1.1\mev\ is
135: obtained for an integrated luminosity of 1\invfb. This error is
136: presently limited by the uncertainty in the $B$-meson
137: mass~\cite{cleo-mass} and by the detector resolution.
138:
139: The beam energies are necessary input for the calculation of two
140: kinematic variables that are commonly used to separate signal from
141: background in the analysis of exclusive $B$-meson decays. These
142: variables, which make optimum use of the measured quantities and
143: are largely uncorrelated, are Lorentz-invariants which can be
144: evaluated both in the laboratory and c.m. frames.
145:
146: The first variable, $\Delta E$, can be expressed in Lorentz invariant
147: form as
148: \begin{equation}
149: \Delta E = (2 q_B q_0 - s) / 2 \sqrt{s} ,
150: \end{equation}
151: where $\sqrt{s}=2 E^*_{beam}$ is the total energy of the \epem\
152: system in the c.m. frame, and $q_B$ and $q_0=(E_0, \vec{p}_0)$ are
153: the Lorentz vectors representing the momentum of the $B$ candidate
154: and of the \epem\ system, $q_0 = q_{e+} + q_{e-}$. In the
155: c.m.~frame, $\Delta E$ takes the familiar form
156: \begin{equation}
157: \Delta E = E^*_B - E^*_{beam} ,
158: \end{equation}
159: here $E^*_B$ is the reconstructed energy of the $\B$~meson. The
160: $\Delta E$ distribution receives a sizable contribution from the beam
161: energy spread, but is generally dominated by detector resolution.
162:
163: The second variable is the energy-substituted mass, $\mes$,
164: defined as $\mes^2 = q_B^2$. In the laboratory frame, \mes\ can be
165: determined from the measured three-momentum $\vec p_B$ of the \B\
166: candidate without explicit knowledge of the masses of the decay
167: products:
168: \begin{equation}
169: \mes = \sqrt { ( s/2 + \vec p_B \vec \cdot p_0)^2/ E_0^2 -p_B^2} .
170: \end{equation}
171: In the c.m.~frame ($\vec{p}_0 = 0$), this variable takes the familiar
172: form
173: \begin{equation}
174: \mes = \sqrt { E_{beam}^{*2} - p_B^{*2}} ,
175: \end{equation}
176: where $p_B^*$ is the c.m.~momentum of the $\B$~meson, derived from the
177: momenta of its decay products, and the $B$-meson energy is substituted
178: by $E^*_{beam}$. Figure~\ref{\secname fig:mes} shows the $\mes$
179: distribution for a sample of fully reconstructed $B$~mesons. The
180: resolution in $\mes$ is dominated by the spread in $E^*_{beam}$,
181: $\sigma_{E^*_{beam}}= 2.6$\mev.
182:
183: \begin{figure}
184: \centering
185: \includegraphics[width=6.1cm]{8583A36}
186:
187: \vspace{-2pc}
188:
189: \caption{The energy-substituted mass for a sample of 6,700 neutral
190: $B$ mesons reconstructed in the final states $D^{(*)-} \pip, D^{(*)-}
191: \rho^+, D^{(*)-} a_1^+$, and $\jpsi K^{*0}$. The background is extrapolated
192: from events outside the signal region.
193: }
194: \label{\secname fig:mes}
195: \end{figure}
196:
197:
198: \subsubsection{Beam Direction}
199:
200: The direction of the beams relative to \babar\ is measured
201: iteratively run-by-run using $e^+e^- \ra e^+e^-$ and $e^+e^- \ra
202: \mu^+\mu^-$ events. The resultant uncertainty in the direction of
203: the boost from the laboratory to the c.m. frame,~$\vec{\beta}$, is
204: about 1\mrad, dominated by alignment errors. This translates into
205: an uncertainty of about 0.3\mev\ in $m_{ES}$. $\vec{\beta}$ is
206: consistent to within 1\mrad\ with the orientation of the elongated
207: beam spot (see below). It is stable to better than 1\mrad\ from
208: one run to the next.
209:
210:
211: \subsubsection{Beam Size and Position}
212:
213: The size and position of the luminous region are critical
214: parameters for the decay-time-dependent analyses and their values
215: are monitored continuously online and offline. The design values
216: for the size of the luminous region are presented in
217: Table~\ref{\secname tab:tabpep2}. The vertical size is too small
218: to be measured directly. It is inferred from the measured
219: luminosity, the horizontal size, and the beam currents; it varies
220: typically by 1--2\mum.
221:
222: The transverse position, size, and angles of the luminous region
223: relative to the \babar\ coordinate system are determined by
224: analyzing the distribution of the distance of closest approach to
225: the $z$-axis of the tracks in well measured two-track events as a
226: function of the azimuth $\phi$. The longitudinal parameters are
227: derived from the longitudinal vertex distribution of the two
228: tracks. A combined fit to nine parameters (three average
229: coordinates, three widths, and three small angles) converges
230: readily, even after significant changes in the beam position. The
231: uncertainties in the average beam position are of the order of a
232: few $\mu$m in the transverse plane and 100\mum\ along the
233: collision axis. Run-by-run variations in the beam position are
234: comparable to these measurement uncertainties, indicating that the
235: beams are stable over the period of a typical run. The fit
236: parameters are stored run-by-run in the \emph{conditions
237: database}. These measurements are also checked offline by
238: measuring the primary vertices in multi-hadron events. The
239: measured horizontal and longitudinal beam sizes, corrected for
240: tracking resolution, are consistent with those measured by \pep2.
241:
242:
243:
244: \subsection{Beam Background Sources }
245:
246: The primary sources of steady-state accelerator backgrounds are, in
247: order of increasing importance: synchrotron radiation in the vicinity
248: of the interaction region; interactions between the beam particles and
249: the residual gas in either ring; and electromagnetic showers generated
250: by beam-beam collisions \cite{mattison,B99,hlbtf}. In addition, there
251: are other background sources that fluctuate widely and can lead to
252: very large instantaneous rates, thereby disrupting stable operation.
253:
254: \subsubsection{Synchrotron Radiation}
255: Synchrotron radiation in nearby dipoles, the interaction-region
256: quadrupole doublets and the B1 separation dipoles generates many kW of
257: power and is potentially a severe background. The beam orbits,
258: vacuum-pipe apertures and synchrotron-radiation masks have been
259: designed such that most of these photons are channeled to a distant
260: dump; the remainder are forced to undergo multiple scatters before
261: they can enter the \babar\ acceptance. The remaining synchrotron
262: radiation background is dominated by x-rays (scattered from tungsten
263: tips of a mask) generated by beam tails in the high-field region of
264: the HER low-$\beta$ quadrupoles. This residual background is
265: relatively low and has not presented significant problems.
266:
267: \subsubsection{Beam-Gas Scattering}
268: Beam-gas bremsstrahlung and Coulomb scattering off residual gas
269: molecules cause beam particles to escape the acceptance of the ring if
270: their energy loss or scattering angle are sufficiently large. The
271: intrinsic rate of these processes is proportional to the product of
272: the beam current and the residual pressure (which itself increases
273: with current). Their relative importance, as well as the resulting
274: spatial distribution and absolute rate of lost particles impinging the
275: vacuum pipe in the vicinity of the detector, depend on the beam
276: optical functions, the limiting apertures, and the entire
277: residual-pressure profile around the rings. The separation dipoles
278: bend the energy-degraded particles from the two beams in opposite
279: directions and consequently most \babar\ detector systems exhibit
280: occupancy peaks in the horizontal plane, \ie\ the LER background near
281: $\phi =0^{\degrees}$ and HER background near $\phi =180^{\degrees}$.
282:
283: During the first few months of operation and during the first
284: month after a local venting of the machine, the higher pressures
285: lead to significantly enhanced background from beam-gas
286: scattering. The situation has improved significantly with time
287: due to \emph{scrubbing} of the vacuum pipe by synchrotron
288: radiation. Towards the end of the first year of data-taking, the
289: dynamic pressure in both rings had dropped below the design goal,
290: and the corresponding background contributions were much reduced.
291: Nevertheless, beam-gas scattering remains the primary source of
292: radiation damage in the SVT and the dominant source of background
293: in all detectors systems, except for the DIRC.
294:
295:
296: \subsubsection{Luminosity Background}
297: Radiative Bhabha scattering results in energy-degraded electrons
298: or positrons hitting aperture limitations within a few meters of
299: the IP and spraying \babar\ with electromagnetic shower debris.
300: This background is directly proportional to the instantaneous
301: luminosity and thus is expected to contribute an increasing
302: fraction of the total background in the future. Already this is
303: the dominant background in the DIRC.
304:
305:
306: \subsubsection{Background Fluctuations}
307: In addition to these steady-state background sources, there are
308: instantaneous sources of radiation that fluctuate on diverse time
309: scales:
310: \begin{itemize}
311: \item
312: beam losses during injection,
313: \item
314: intense bursts of radiation, varying in duration from a few ms to
315: several minutes, currently attributed to very small dust particles,
316: which become trapped in the beam,
317: %most likely originating in the non-evaporative getter pumps,
318: and
319: \item
320: non-Gaussian tails from beam-beam interactions (especially of the
321: e$^+$ beam) that are highly sensitive to adjustments in collimator
322: settings and ring tunes.
323: \end{itemize}
324: These effects typically lead to short periods of high background and
325: have resulted in a large number of \babar -initiated beam aborts (see
326: below).
327:
328:
329: \subsection{Radiation Protection\\ and Monitoring}
330:
331: A system has been developed to monitor the instantaneous and
332: integrated radiation doses, and to either abort the beams or to
333: halt or limit the rate of injection, if conditions become
334: critical. In addition, DCH and IFR currents, as well as DIRC and
335: IFR counting rates, are monitored; abnormally high rates signal
336: critical conditions.
337:
338: Radiation monitoring and protection systems are installed for the
339: SVT, the DCH electronics, and the EMC. The radiation doses are
340: measured with silicon photodiodes. For the SVT, 12 diodes are
341: arranged in three horizontal planes, at, above, and below the beam
342: level, with four diodes in each plane, placed at $z= +12.1$\cm\
343: and $z= -8.5$\cm\ and at a radial distance of 3\cm\ from the beam
344: line~\cite{tim}. The diode leakage current, after correction for
345: temperature and radiation damage effects, is proportional to the
346: dose rate. The four diodes in the middle are exposed to about ten
347: times more radiation than the others. These mid-plane diodes are
348: connected to the beam abort system, while the remaining eight
349: diodes at the top and bottom are used to monitor the radiation
350: dose delivered to the SVT. The accuracy of the measured average
351: dose rate is better than 0.5 mRad/s. The integrated dose, as
352: measured by the SVT diodes, is presented in Figure~\ref{\secname
353: fig:svtdose}.
354:
355: \begin{figure}
356: \centering
357: \includegraphics [width=6.2cm] {8583A52}
358: \vspace{-1.5pc}
359:
360: \caption {The integrated radiation dose as measured by PIN diodes
361: located at three different positions, showing contributions from the
362: HER ($\phi =180^{\circ}$),
363: and the LER ($\phi =0^{\circ}$) in the horizontal plane, and from both
364: beams combined elsewhere. Also shown is the SVT radiation budget for
365: the first 500 days of operation.}
366: \label{\secname fig:svtdose}
367: \end{figure}
368:
369: The radiation level at the DCH and the EMC is more than two orders
370: of magnitude lower than at the SVT. To amplify the signal, the PIN
371: diodes for the DCH and EMC are mounted on small CsI(Tl) crystals
372: (with a volume of about 10\cm$^3$). These silicon diodes are
373: installed in sets of four. Three sets are mounted on the front
374: face of the endcap calorimeter and one set on the backward
375: endplate of the DCH, close to the readout electronics. The signals
376: of the four diodes in each set are summed, amplified, and fed into
377: the radiation protection electronics. Only one of the three diode
378: sets of the EMC is used at any given time. The DCH and the EMC
379: use identical hardware and decision algorithms. They limit
380: injection rates whenever an instantaneous dose equivalent to about
381: 1~Rad/day is exceeded.
382:
383: The SVT employs a different strategy and circuitry to assess
384: whether the measured radiation levels merit a beam abort or a
385: reduction in single-beam injection rate. Every beam dump initiated
386: by \babar\ is followed by a 10--15 minute period of injection with
387: significant radiation exposure. Thus, to minimize the ratio of the
388: integrated radiation dose to the integrated luminosity, it has
389: been beneficial to tolerate transient high-dose events as long as
390: the integrated dose remains less than the typical dose accumulated
391: during injection. To differentiate between very high
392: instantaneous radiation and sustained high dose rates, trip
393: thresholds are enforced on two different time scales: an
394: instantaneous dose of 1~Rad accumulated over 1\ms, and an average
395: of 50~mRad/s measured over a 5-minute period. During injection,
396: higher thresholds are imposed, since an aborted injection will
397: delay the return to taking data.
398:
399: Figure \ref{\secname fig:trip_rate} shows the daily rate of beam
400: aborts initiated by the SVT protection diodes during the year
401: 2000. Initially, as many as 80 beam aborts were triggered per day,
402: while the average for stable operation was significantly below ten
403: at the end of the run. The measures described above, combined with
404: a significant reduction in large background fluctuations, have
405: been very effective in protecting the detector against radiation
406: damage, as well increasing the combined live time of the machine
407: and detector to greater than 75\%.
408:
409: \begin{figure}
410: \centering
411: \includegraphics [width=6.5cm] {triprate}
412:
413: \vspace{-1.5pc}
414:
415: \caption{Daily rates of beam aborts initiated by the SVT radiation
416: protection diodes, summed over regular data-taking and \pep2\ injection.}
417: \label{\secname fig:trip_rate}
418: \end{figure}
419:
420:
421: \subsection{Impact of Beam-Generated\\ Background on \babar\ }
422:
423: Beam-generated backgrounds affect the detector in multiple ways.
424: They cause radiation damage to the detector components and the
425: electronics and thus may limit the lifetime of the experiment.
426: They may also cause electrical breakdown and damage or generate
427: large numbers of extraneous signals leading to problems with
428: bandwidth limitations of the data acquisition system and with
429: event reconstruction. Backgrounds can degrade resolution and
430: decrease efficiency.
431:
432: The impact of the beam-generated background on the lifetime and on
433: the operation of the different detector systems varies
434: significantly. Table~\ref{\secname tab:bbrlims} lists the limits
435: on the instantaneous and integrated background levels in terms of
436: the total dose and instantaneous observables. These limits are
437: estimates derived from beam tests and experience of earlier
438: experiments. For each detector system, an annual radiation
439: allowance has been established taking into account the total
440: estimated lifetime of the components and the expected annual
441: operating conditions. The typical values accumulated for the
442: first year of operation are also presented in the table.
443:
444: \begin{table*}[htb]
445: \caption{\babar\ background tolerance. Operational limits are
446: expressed either as lifetime limits (radiation-damage and
447: aging-related quantities), or in terms of instantaneous observables
448: (DCH current, DIRC and L1-trigger rates).}
449:
450: \vspace{\baselineskip}
451:
452: \centering
453: \begin{tabular}{lccc}
454: \hline \hline
455: \rule{0pt}{12pt} & Limiting factor & Operational &First-year \\
456: Detector system& \rule[-5pt]{0pt}{0pt}and impact & limit & typical
457: \\ \hline \hline
458: SVT sensors\rule{0pt}{12pt} & Integrated dose: & 2 MRad & 0.33
459: MRad \\
460: and electronics & radiation damage & & (hor.-plane modules) \\
461: & & & 0.06 MRad \\
462: & & & (other modules)\\
463: SVT sensors & Instantaneous dose: &1~Rad/ms & N/A \\
464: & diode shorts & \rule[-5pt]{0pt}{0pt}& \\ \hline
465: DCH: electronics &Integrated dose:\rule{0pt}{12pt} & 20 kRad & $\le$ 100 Rad \\
466: &radiation damage && \\
467: DCH: wire current & Accumulated charge: &100 mC/cm & 8 mC/cm\\
468: & wire aging & & \\
469: DCH: total current & HV system limitations & 1000 $\mu$A & 250 $\mu$A \\
470: & \rule[-5pt]{0pt}{0pt}& & (steady-state) \\ \hline
471: DIRC PMTs \rule{0pt}{12pt}& Counting rate: & 200 kHz & 110 kHz (steady-state,\\
472: & TDC deadtime &\rule[-5pt]{0pt}{0pt} & well-shielded sector) \\
473: \hline
474: EMC crystals & Integrated dose:\rule{0pt}{12pt} & 10 kRad & 0.25 kRad \\
475: & radiation damage & \rule[-5pt]{0pt}{0pt}& (worst case) \\ \hline
476: L1 trigger & Counting rate:\rule{0pt}{12pt} & 2 kHz & 0.7 kHz \\ & DAQ dead time & &
477: (steady-state)\\
478: \hline\hline
479: \end{tabular}
480: \label{\secname tab:bbrlims}
481: \end{table*}
482:
483:
484: Systematic studies of background rates were performed with stable
485: stored beams. Measurements of the current-dependence of the
486: backgrounds were carried out for single beams, two beams not
487: colliding, and colliding beams with the goal to identify the principal
488: background sources, to develop schemes of reducing these sources, and
489: to extrapolate to operation at higher luminosity \cite{hlbtf}. These
490: experimental studies were complemented by Monte Carlo simulations of
491: beam-gas scattering and of the propagation of showers in the
492: detector. The studies show that the relative importance of the
493: single-beam and luminosity background contributions varies, as
494: illustrated in Figure~\ref{\secname fig:towersnow}. Data for the IFR
495: are not shown because this system is largely insensitive to
496: beam-generated backgrounds, except for the outer layer of the forward
497: endcap, due to insufficient shielding of the external beam line
498: components.
499:
500: \begin{figure}
501: \centering
502: \includegraphics [width=6.5cm] {8583A31}
503:
504: \vspace{-1.5pc}
505:
506: \caption{Fractional steady-state background contributions in
507: \babar\ detector systems, measured for single beams and colliding
508: beams under stable conditions ($I^+=1.25~A$, $I^-=0.75~A$,
509: $L=2.3\times10^{33}\,$cm$^{-2}\,$s$^{-1}$) in July 2000. The
510: contributions are derived from the measured doses in the
511: horizontal plane for the SVT, the total currents in the DCH, the
512: rates in the DIRC photomultipliers, the occupancy and number of
513: photons above 10~\mev\ in the EMC, and the L1 trigger rates.
514: %The beam-gas and synchrotron radiation backgrounds are combined for each ring.
515: }
516: \label{\secname fig:towersnow}
517: \end{figure}
518:
519:
520: The experience of the first year of operation and the concern for
521: future operation for each of the detectors are summarized as follows.
522:
523: \textbf{SVT}: ~~The most significant concern for the SVT with
524: regard to machine background is the integrated radiation dose. The
525: instantaneous and integrated dose rates in the radiation
526: protection diodes are representative, to within about a factor of
527: two, of the radiation doses absorbed by the SVT modules. The
528: exposure in the horizontal planes is an order of magnitude larger
529: than elsewhere, averaging 15--25~mRad/s during stable beam
530: operation. The highest integrated dose is 450~kRad, roughly
531: 1~kRad/day. This dose is about 30\% below the allowance, giving
532: some confidence that the SVT can sustain operation for several
533: more years (see Figure \ref{\secname fig:svtdose}).
534:
535: %\item
536: \textbf{DCH}: ~~For the DCH, the currents on the wires are the main
537: concern, both because of the limited capacity of the HV power supplies
538: and the effect of wire aging. The currents drawn are approximately
539: uniformly distributed among the 44 HV supplies, one for each quadrant
540: of superlayers 2--10, and two per quadrant for superlayer 1.
541: Consequently, the total current limit is close to the sum of the
542: limits of the individual supplies. During stable operation the total
543: chamber current is 200--300\muA. However, radiation spikes can lead
544: to currents that occasionally exceed the limit of 1000\muA, causing HV
545: supplies to trip. Other background effects are measured to be well
546: below the estimated lifetime limits and thus are not a serious issue
547: at this time. The average wire occupancy has not exceeded 1--2\%
548: during stable operation, but the extrapolation to future operation at
549: higher luminosity and currents remains a major concern.
550:
551: \textbf{DIRC}: ~~The DIRC radiators, made of synthetic fused silica, were
552: tested up to doses of 100~kRad without showing any measurable effects
553: and thus radiation damage is not a concern. The present operational
554: limit of the DIRC is set by the TDC electronics which induce
555: significant dead time at rates above 250\khz, well above the stable
556: beam rate of 110\khz\ in well shielded areas. Roughly half of the
557: present rate is luminosity-related and can be attributed to radiative
558: Bhabha scattering. The counting rate is due to debris from
559: electromagnetic showers entering the water-filled \emph{stand-off box}.
560: Efforts are underway to improve the shielding of the beam pipe nearby.
561:
562: \textbf{EMC}: ~~The lifetime of the EMC is set by the reduction in light
563: collection in the CsI crystals due to radiation damage. The
564: cumulative dose absorbed by the EMC is measured by a large set of
565: RadFETs placed in front of the barrel and endcap crystals.
566: RadFETs~\cite{radfets} are realtime integrating dosimeters based on
567: solid-state Metal Oxide Semiconductor (MOS) technology. The absorbed
568: dose increases approximately linearly with the integrated luminosity.
569: The highest dose to date was observed in the innermost ring of the
570: endcap, close to 250~Rad, while the barrel crystals accumulated about
571: 80~Rad. The observed reduction in light collection of 10--15\% in the
572: worst place, and 4--7\% in the barrel, is consistent with expectation
573: (see Section~\ref{sec:emc}).
574:
575: The energy resolution is dependent on the single crystal readout
576: threshold, currently set at 1\mev. During stable beam conditions
577: the average crystal occupancy for random triggers is 16\%, with
578: 10\% originating from electronics noise in the absence of any
579: energy deposition. The spectrum of photons observed in the EMC
580: from the LER and HER is presented in Figure \ref{\secname
581: fig:EMC_bg}. The HER produces a somewhat harder spectrum. The
582: average occupancy for a threshold of 1\mev\ and the average number
583: of crystals with a deposited energy of more than 10\mev\ are shown
584: in Figure \ref{\secname fig:EMC_bgrate} as a function of beam
585: currents for both single and colliding beams. The occupancy
586: increases significantly at smaller polar angles, in the forward
587: endcap and the backward barrel sections, and in the horizontal
588: plane. The rate increase is approximately linear with the single
589: beam currents. Background rates recorded with separated beams are
590: consistent with those produced by single beams. For colliding
591: beams, there is an additional flux of photons originating from
592: small angle radiative Bhabha scattering. This effect is larger
593: for low energy photons and thus it is expected that at higher
594: luminosities the low energy background will raise the occupancy
595: and thereby limit the EMC energy resolution.
596:
597:
598: \begin{figure}
599: \centering
600: \includegraphics[width=6.5cm]{emc_background}
601: \vspace{-1.5pc}
602: \caption{The energy spectrum of photons recorded in the EMC by random
603: triggers with single beams at typical operating currents, LER at 1.1A and
604: HER at 0.7A. The electronic noise has been subtracted. }
605: \label{\secname fig:EMC_bg}
606: \end{figure}
607:
608: \begin{figure}
609: \centering
610: \includegraphics [width=6.5cm] {8583A08}
611: \vspace{-2pc}
612:
613: \caption{Average rates in the EMC for random triggers as a function of the
614: HER current for a fixed LER current of 1.1A, both for separated and colliding
615: beams; a) the single crystal occupancy for thresholds of 1\mev\ and b) the
616: number of crystals with a deposited energy greater than 10\mev. The solid curves
617: represent a fit to the colliding beam data, the dashed curves indicate the sum of
618: rates recorded for single beams.}
619: \label{\secname fig:EMC_bgrate}
620: \end{figure}
621:
622: \textbf{L1 Trigger}: ~~During stable beam operation, the typical
623: L1 trigger rate is below 1\khz, more than a factor of two below
624: the data acquisition bandwidth limit of about 2.0--2.5\khz.
625: Experience shows that background bursts and other rate spikes can
626: raise the data volume by as much as a factor of two and thus it is
627: necessary to aim for steady state rates significantly below the
628: stated limit. For the L1 trigger, the dominant sources of DCH
629: triggers are particles generated by interactions in vacuum flanges
630: and the B1 magnets (see Figure~\ref{trg_fig:trg-l3trkz0} in
631: Section~\ref{trg_sec:trg}). This effect is most pronounced in the
632: horizontal plane. At present, the HER background is twice as high
633: as that of the LER, and the colliding beams contribute less than
634: half of the combined LER and HER single beam triggers.
635:
636: \begin{figure}
637: \centering
638: \includegraphics [width=6.2cm] {8583A07}
639: \vspace{-2pc}
640: \caption{The L1 trigger rate as a function of the HER current for single beam
641: only, for both beams, separated and colliding (with a LER current of 1.1A).}
642: \label{\secname fig:TRG_bg}
643: \end{figure}
644:
645:
646:
647:
648: \subsection{Summary and Outlook}
649:
650: Towards the end of the first year of data-taking, \pep2\ routinely
651: delivered beams close to design luminosity. Due to the very close
652: cooperation with the \pep2\ operations team, the machine-induced
653: backgrounds have not been a major problem once stable conditions
654: were established. The background monitoring and protection system
655: has become a reliable and useful tool to safeguard the detector
656: operation.
657:
658: Currently planned upgrades are expected to raise the luminosity to
659: $1.5 \times 10^{34}\,$cm$^{-2}\,$s$^{-1}$ within a few years. The
660: single beam backgrounds will increase with beam currents and the
661: luminosity background is projected to exceed, or at best remain
662: comparable to, the beam-gas contribution. Measures are being prepared
663: to reduce the sources and the impact of machine-related background on
664: \babar, among them upgrades to the DCH power supply system and to the
665: DIRC TDC electronics, the addition of localized shielding against
666: shower debris (especially for the DIRC \emph{stand-off box}), new
667: vacuum chambers, adjustable collimators, and additional pumping
668: capacity in critical regions upbeam of the interaction point.
669:
670: With the expected increase in LER current and in luminosity, both the
671: single-beam and the luminosity-generated L1 trigger rates will
672: increase and are projected to exceed 2\khz\ (see Figure \ref{\secname
673: fig:TRG_bg}). Therefore, the DCH trigger is being upgraded to improve
674: the rejection of background tracks originating from outside the
675: luminous region. In addition, the data acquisition and data processing
676: capacity will need to be expanded to meet the demands of higher
677: luminosity.
678:
679: Overall, the occupancy in all systems, except the IFR, will
680: probably reach levels that are likely to impact the resolution and
681: reconstruction efficiency. For instance, the occupancy in the EMC
682: is expected to more than double. Thus, beyond the relatively
683: straight forward measures currently planned for \babar\ system
684: upgrades, detailed studies of the impact of higher occupancy will
685: be necessary for all systems.
686: