1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %%
3: %% wrup.tex : 07-12-98 ver. 1.0.
4: %% This Latex2e file rewritten by R. Sankaran from various sources for use
5: %% in the preparation of the two-column proceedings volume, for trim
6: %% size [10x7] to be published by World Scientific by with acknowledgements
7: %% to Susan Hezlet and Lukas Nellen.
8: %%
9: %% Please forward modifications required and comments to:rsanka@wspc.com.sg
10: %%
11: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
12: %%
13: %
14: \documentclass{wrup}
15:
16: \def\stot{\mbox{$\sigma_{\rm tot}^{\gamma p}$}}
17:
18: \begin{document}
19:
20: \title{\boldmath $F_2^{\rm p}$ at low $Q^2$
21: and the total $\gamma p$ cross section at HERA}
22:
23: \author{S. Levonian}
24:
25: \address{DESY, Hamburg, Germany\\
26: E-mail: levonian@mail.desy.de}
27:
28: \twocolumn[\maketitle\abstract{
29: New precise measurements of the neutral current cross section at HERA
30: are presented in different $Q^2$ regimes.
31: In the photoproduction limit the total $\gamma p$ cross section is found
32: to be in agreement with the universal soft Pomeron prediction.
33: At medium scales $1.5 \leq Q^2 \leq 150$ GeV$^2$ both the $F_2$ and the $F_L$
34: structure functions are determined. These data are well described
35: by NLO pQCD. The gluon density in the proton has been extracted from the
36: scaling violation of $F_2$ at low $x$.
37: The transition between the two regimes occurs at around $Q^2 \simeq 1$
38: GeV$^2$.}]
39: %and its underlying dynamics is still a challenge for theory.}]
40:
41: \section{Introduction}
42: %=======================
43:
44: Half a century of the extensive studies of strong interactions
45: resulted in two different approaches to the problem:
46: Reggeon field theory (RFT)\cite{RFT} and QCD.
47: RFT, the $S$-matrix theory based on the most general physical principles,
48: has proven to be very successful in describing soft peripheral processes
49: ($t/s \ll 1$) at high energies ($s \to \infty$). There is however no
50: microscopic picture of underlying dynamics in it.
51: On the other hand QCD, being {\em the} theory of strong interactions,
52: has technical problems in the non-perturbative regime. pQCD is applicable
53: to hard processes only.
54: Lepton-proton scattering experiments at HERA have the unique possibility
55: to contribute to the successful merging of those two approaches
56: by performing the scan over the large available range of the photon virtuality,
57: $Q^2$, and studying the interplay of short and long distance physics.
58:
59:
60: In this talk the following questions are discussed,
61: using high statistics Neutral Current (NC) data
62: recorded in the years 1994 to 1997 with the H1 and ZEUS apparatus
63: in $e^+p$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=300$ GeV:
64: \begin{enumerate}
65: \item How far up in $Q^2$ can one get with Regge theory
66: starting from photoproduction?
67: \item How far down in $Q^2$ can one go with pQCD?
68: \item Where in $Q^2$ is the transition region?
69: \end{enumerate}
70:
71:
72:
73: \section{Photoproduction limit}
74: %===============================
75:
76: The total $\gamma p$ cross section is measured at HERA by detecting
77: scattered positrons under very small angles $\theta\!<\!5$ mrad with respect to
78: the incoming $e^+$ beam,
79: in a special calorimeter installed in the tunnel.
80: This ensures $Q^2 \!< 0.02$ GeV$^2$ (with the average value of $10^{-4}$ GeV$^2$)
81: and justifies the use of pure transverse photon flux in the equivalent photon
82: approximation relating the $ep$ cross section with $\stot$.
83: %
84: Major systematics is approximately equally shared between the positron detector
85: acceptance uncertainty and the precision of the hadronic final state modelling.
86:
87: \begin{figure}[hb]
88: \epsfxsize195pt
89: \figurebox{}{}{wr_sigtot.eps}
90: \caption{The total photon-proton cross section as a function of
91: centre-of-mass energy. The insert magnifies HERA results.}
92: \label{fig:stot}
93: \end{figure}
94:
95: New measurement of the total $\gamma p$ cross section
96: at average centre-of-mass energy $W_{\gamma p}=207$ GeV
97: has been presented by the ZEUS collaboration~\cite{Zstot}.
98: Their result of $\stot = 172 \pm 1(stat.)^{+13}_{-15}(syst.)~\mu$b
99: is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:stot} together with the
100: published H1 measurement~\cite{Hstot} and the low-energy data.
101: Also shown are three Regge motivated parameterizations~\cite{Regge}. In two of them
102: the high energy behavior of $\stot$ is driven by the universal soft Pomeron, while
103: the DL98 parameterization has additionally a hard Pomeron term.
104:
105:
106:
107: \section{NC cross section in DIS regime}
108: %========================================
109:
110: New measurements of the deep inelastic NC cross section are available from both
111: the H1~\cite{HF2} and ZEUS~\cite{ZF2med} collaborations.
112: High statistics data span the kinematic region of $1.5 \leq Q^2 \leq 150$ GeV$^2$
113: and Bjorken-$x$ values $0.00003 \leq x \leq 0.2$.
114: Using improved detection capabilities and increased HERA luminosity a high
115: precision of typically 3$\%$ is achieved.
116: This allowed, for the first time, to perform NLO QCD analysis of the
117: inclusive cross section measurements using H1 data alone~\cite{HF2}.
118: The gluon density at low $x$ has been determined from the large positive
119: scaling violation of $F_2$ (see Fig.~\ref{fig:gluon}).
120: It was found, that NLO QCD fit describes all low $x$ data well.
121: Some dependence is observed however of the fit parameters on the value of
122: $Q^2_{min}$ -- the minimum $Q^2$ of the H1 data used in the fit. This is directly
123: reflected in the steepness of the gluon density, as seen in Fig.~\ref{fig:gluon},b.
124:
125: In order to reduce such `flexibility' of the QCD fit additional constraints
126: may be imposed.
127: Potentially powerful is the longitudinal structure function $F_L$,
128: which contains independent information about gluon distribution.
129: $F_L(x,Q^2)$ as determined using two different methods~\cite{HF2} is shown in
130: Fig.~\ref{fig:FL} together with the fixed target results. The increase of
131: $F_L(x,Q^2)$ towards low $x$ reflects the rise of the gluon momentum distribution
132: and is consistently described by NLO QCD fit.
133:
134:
135:
136: \section{\mbox{Transition region: closing the gap}}
137: %==================================================
138:
139: To summarize, HERA has verified that RFT works in photoproduction ($\stot$).
140: New precision results also demonstrate that in DIS regime pQCD describes
141: inclusive NC cross section ($F_2, F_L$). But where is the transition between
142: the two? And how does it happen?
143:
144: \begin{figure}[hb]
145: %\epsfxsize170pt
146: \epsfig{file=wr_sv_lowx.eps,width=183pt}
147: \epsfig{file=wr_gluon.eps,width=183pt}
148: \caption{Effect of the $Q^2_{min}$ cut applied in DGLAP QCD fit to the H1 data on
149: a) the structure function $F_2$ at low $Q^2$ and
150: b) the gluon distribution at $Q^2=5$ GeV$^2$.}
151: \label{fig:gluon}
152:
153: \end{figure}
154: \begin{figure}[tb]
155: \epsfxsize200pt
156: \figurebox{}{}{wr_fl.eps}
157: \caption{The longitudinal structure function $F_L(x,Q^2)$.
158: The error bands are due to the experimental (inner) and model (outer)
159: uncertainty of the $F_L$ calculation using NLO QCD fit to the H1 data
160: for $y<0.35$ and $Q^2>3.5$ GeV$^2$.}
161: \label{fig:FL}
162: \end{figure}
163:
164: \begin{figure}[tb]
165: \epsfxsize190pt
166: \figurebox{}{}{wr_F2Q2_BPT.eps}
167: \caption{Measured $F_2(Q^2)$ in bins of $y$.}
168: \label{fig:BPT}
169: \end{figure}
170:
171: \noindent
172: New low $Q^2$ ZEUS data~\cite{ZF2} at $0.045 \leq Q^2 \leq 0.65$ GeV$^2$
173: almost completely closed the gap between photoproduction and DIS.
174: They are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:BPT} together with
175: previous HERA measurements at higher $Q^2$.
176: It is seen that low $Q^2$ points are described adequately by the
177: Regge motivated fit (solid lines) while pQCD fits the data above 1.5 GeV$^2$
178: (dashed lines).
179: The data exhibit a smooth transition at around $Q^2 \approx 1$ GeV$^2$
180: while the matching between the two theoretical fits is not perfect yet.
181:
182:
183: \section{Conclusions}
184: %====================
185:
186: New precise HERA data have been used to study how the properties
187: of strong interactions evolves with $Q^2$.
188: %
189: In the photoproduction limit $\stot$ ~exhibits mild rise similar to that of
190: hadron-hadron scattering.
191: It is well described by the conventional Regge theory with universal soft Pomeron.
192: Regge parameterization also describes the data in the low $Q^2<0.7$ GeV$^2$ region.
193: %
194: In DIS regime NLO QCD is able to describe $F_2$ data all the way down to
195: %surprisingly low scale,
196: $Q^2 \simeq 1.5 $ GeV$^2$.
197: %
198: A smooth transition from partonic to hadronic
199: degrees of freedom occurs at around $Q^2 \simeq 1$ GeV$^2$.
200: The details of the underlying dynamics is still
201: a challenge for theory.
202:
203:
204: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
205:
206: \bibitem{RFT}
207: V.N. Gribov, {\it Sov. Phys. JETP} {\bf 26}, 414 (1968).
208:
209: % \bibitem{WWA}
210: % C.F.Weizs\"{a}cker, {\it Z.Phys.} {\bf 88}, 612 (1934); \\
211: % E.J.Wiliams, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf 45}, 729 (1934); \\
212: % S.Frixione et al., {\it Phys. Lett. B} {\bf 319}, 339 (1993).
213:
214: \bibitem{Zstot}
215: ZEUS Collab., Contributed Paper 411.
216:
217: \bibitem{Hstot}
218: H1 Collab., S. Aid et al., {\it Z. Phys. C} {\bf 69}, 27 (1995).
219:
220: \bibitem{Regge}
221: R.M.Barnett et al., {\it Phys. Rev. D} {\bf 54}, 1 (1996);
222: H. Abramowicz and A. Levy, \\ {\it DESY} 97-251;
223: A. Donnachie and P.V. Landshoff, {\it Phys.Lett. B}{\bf 437}, 408 (1998).
224:
225: \bibitem{HF2}
226: H1 Collab., Contributed Paper 415.
227:
228: \bibitem{ZF2med}
229: ZEUS Collab., Contributed Paper 412.
230:
231: \bibitem{ZF2}
232: ZEUS Collab., Contributed Paper 294;
233: {\it Phys. Lett. B} {\bf 487}, 53 (2000).
234:
235: \end{thebibliography}
236:
237: \end{document}
238:
239:
240: %%%%%%%%%%%%%% End of ws-p10x7.tex %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
241: