1: \subsection{Confirmation of $\nu_{\mu}\rightarrow\nu_{\tau}$
2: in atmospheric neutrino observation}
3: \hspace*{\parindent}
4: Neutral current (NC) interaction detects the sum of
5: $\nu_{\mu}\rightarrow\nu_e,\nu_{\mu}$, and $\nu_{\tau}$
6: oscillations\footnote{According to the LEP result,
7: there are only 3 light active neutrinos.}.
8: Therefore, NC measurement combined with
9: $\nu_{\mu}\rightarrow\nu_e$ and $\nu_{\mu}\rightarrow\nu_{\mu}$
10: measurements provide indirect measurement of the
11: $\nu_{\mu}\rightarrow\nu_{\tau}$ oscillation.
12: The NC measurement also provides a constraint
13: on the existence of a sterile neutrino, $\nu_s$, since
14: the $\nu_{\mu}\rightarrow\nu_s$ oscillation
15: results in reduction of NC interactions.
16:
17: In the JHF neutrino beam energy of $\sim$1~GeV,
18: the dominant $\nu_\mu$ NC interactions are single $\pi$ productions.
19: Among those, single $\pi^0$ production process has a unique
20: signature that only electromagnetic showers
21: made by decay photons are observed without any other
22: activities. Therefore, we focus on the single $\pi^0$
23: production mode.
24:
25: A background from charged current (CC) interactions with a $\pi^0$
26: are separated by identifying at least one muon in the final state.
27: Muons are identified by detecting an extra \v{C}erenkov ring or the Cherenkov photons,
28: or by detecting the decay electrons.
29: In the Super-Kamiokande analysis, the efficiency of detecting
30: the decay electrons is better than 80\%.
31: Another background is from NC interactions by high energy
32: neutrinos which are out of the oscillation maximum.
33: Though we cannot reconstruct the initial neutrino energy
34: for the NC interaction, the total energy deposit
35: in the detector, called ``visible energy'', is used to reject
36: high energy events.
37: When the high energy neutrino produces multiple pions,
38: which is the dominant process at high energy,
39: they are further suppressed by vetoing on the extra pion
40: rings as well as decay electrons from the
41: ${\pi^+\rightarrow \mu^+ \nu_\mu}, {\mu^+ \rightarrow e^+ \bar{\nu_\mu} \nu_e}$
42: decay chain.
43:
44: Thus, the selection criteria are defined as follows:
45: 1) the event must be fully contained,
46: 2) visible energy (electron equivalent energy) must be greater
47: than 100~MeV and less than 1500~MeV,
48: 3) the number of rings in an event must be less than three,
49: 4) all the rings must be electron-like and
50: 5) no decay electron is identified.
51:
52: After applying these selection criteria,
53: about 315 events are expected to be observed in one year
54: without neutrino oscillation for WBB.
55: Out of 315 events, 88\% are from NC interactions,
56: 9\% are from $\nu_\mu$ CC interactions, and 3\% are from $\nu_e$ CC interaction
57: intrinsically in the beam.
58: The remaining 9\% events from $\nu_\mu$ CC interactions is hard
59: to be eliminated because the muon is captured by oxygen and
60: does not decay. The results are summarized in
61: Table~\ref{nc:tab:sum} together with the other beam configurations.
62: \begin{table}
63: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1}
64: \begin{center}
65: \caption{\protect\footnotesize
66: Summary of the event rate of the NC candidates.
67: $f(X)$ is the fraction of the events from $X$ interaction.} \label{nc:tab:sum}
68: \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
69: \hline
70: Beam & \#NC Events & Beam exposure& $f(\nu_\mu \rm NC)$
71: & $f(\nu_\mu \rm CC)$ & $(\nu_e \rm CC)$ \\
72: \hline
73: WBB & 315 & 1 years & 0.88 & 0.09 & 0.03 \\
74: LE2$\pi$ & 250 & 5 years & 0.80 & 0.13 & 0.07 \\
75: OA2$^\circ$ & 700 & 5 years & 0.84 & 0.09 & 0.07 \\
76: \hline
77: \end{tabular}
78: \end{center}
79: \end{table}
80: %
81:
82:
83: The expected numbers of events as a function of $\Delta m^2$ are
84: shown in Figure~\ref{TAUSTERILE}.
85: In the figures, maximal oscillations, $\sin^22\theta_{23}$=1.0, is assumed.
86: \begin{figure}
87: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1}
88: \centerline{(a)\hspace*{0.3\textwidth}(b)\hspace*{0.3\textwidth}(c)}
89: \centerline{
90: \epsfig{file=fig/finplotwbb.eps,width=0.3\textwidth}
91: \epsfig{file=fig/finplotnbb20.eps,width=0.3\textwidth}
92: \epsfig{file=fig/finplotoab2.eps,width=0.3\textwidth}
93: }
94: \vspace{-4mm}
95: \caption{\protect\footnotesize
96: Expected number of events with various $\Delta m^2$
97: for (a) 1 year of WBB,
98: (b) 5 years of LE2$\pi$
99: and (c) 5 years of OA2$^\circ$.
100: The solid lines show the expected numbers of events
101: assuming $\nu_\mu \rightarrow \nu_\tau$
102: or $\nu_\mu \rightarrow \nu_s$. The dotted lines show the
103: 90\% C.L. regions of $\nu_\mu \rightarrow \nu_\tau$ oscillation.}
104: \label{TAUSTERILE}
105: \end{figure}
106: Although full mixing is assumed, expected number of events
107: does not become 0 even at the deepest dip point. This is due to
108: the NC interactions of high energy neutrinos.
109: %
110: The dotted lines in each figure correspond to the 90\% C.L.
111: limit for $\nu_\mu \rightarrow \nu_\tau$ oscillations
112: assuming a systematic uncertainty of 5\%.
113: The expected numbers of events for
114: $\nu_\mu \rightarrow \nu_\tau$ and for $\nu_\mu \rightarrow \nu_s$
115: are clearly separated if the $\Delta m^2$ is larger than
116: $2 \times 10^{-3}$ for WBB,
117: $1.5 \times 10^{-3}$ for LE2$\pi$ and $1\times 10^{-3}$ for OA2$^\circ$.
118:
119: