1: % LATEX (RevTex) template for submission of papers to EPS and LP 2001.
2:
3: \lefthyphenmin=2
4: \righthyphenmin=3
5: \documentstyle[preprint,epsfig,eqsecnum,aps,floats,tighten]{revtex}
6:
7: \def\Missing#1#2{{\mbox{$#1\kern-0.57em\raise0.19ex\hbox{/}_{#2}$}}}
8:
9: \def\vMissing#1#2{\ifmmode
10: \vec{#1}\kern-0.57em\raise.19ex\hbox{/}_{#2}
11: \else
12: {{\mbox{$\vec{#1}\kern-0.57em\raise.19ex\hbox{/}_{#2}$}}}
13: \fi}
14: \def\lsim{\mathrel{\rlap{\lower4pt\hbox{\hskip1pt$\sim$}}
15: \raise1pt\hbox{$<$}}}
16: \def\gsim{\mathrel{\rlap{\lower4pt\hbox{\hskip1pt$\sim$}}
17: \raise1pt\hbox{$>$}}}
18: \def\et{\mbox{$E_{T}$}}
19: \def\met{\mbox{$\Missing{E}{T}$}}
20: \def\vmet{\mbox{$\vMissing{E}{T}$}}
21: \def\mht{\mbox{$\Missing{H}{T}$}}
22: \def\pt{\mbox{$p_{T}$}}
23: \def\mpt{\mbox{$\Missing{p}{T}$}}
24: \def\D0{D\O }
25: \def\etal{\it et al}
26: \def\PBARP{\mbox{$p\overline{p}$}}
27: \def\pp{\mbox{$pp$}}
28: \def\qqbar{\mbox{$q\overline{q}$}}
29: \def\pbar{\mbox{$\overline{p}$}}
30: \def\px{\mbox{$p_{x}$}}
31: \def\py{\mbox{$p_{y}$}}
32: \def\pz{\mbox{$p_{z}$}}
33: \def\dsdpt{\mbox{$d\sigma^W/dp_T^W$}}
34: \newcommand{\Et}{\mbox{$E_{\rm T}$}}
35: \newcommand{\Etu}[1]{\mbox{$E^{\rm jet#1}_{T}$}}
36: \newcommand{\Etmax}{\mbox{$E_{T}^{\rm max}$}}
37: \newcommand{\Etjet}{\mbox{$E_{T}^{\rm jet}$}}
38: \newcommand{\Etxxx}{\mbox{$E_{T}^{\rm xxx}$}}
39: \newcommand{\Rc}{\mbox{${\mathcal R}$}}
40: \newcommand{\Rsep}{\mbox{${\mathcal{R}}_{\rm sep}$}}
41: \newcommand{\Exi}{E_{x}^{i}}
42: \newcommand{\Eyi}{E_{y}^{i}}
43: \newcommand{\Ezi}{E_{z}^{i}}
44: \newcommand{\Ex}{E_{x}}
45: \newcommand{\Ey}{E_{y}}
46: \newcommand{\Ez}{E_{z}}
47: \newcommand{\ETi}{E_{T}^{i}}
48: \newcommand{\rstev}{\mbox{$\rs = \T{1.8}$}}
49: \newcommand{\rssps}{\mbox{$\rs = \T{0.63}$}}
50: \newcommand{\XX}{\mbox{$\, \times \,$}}
51: \newcommand{\AP}{\mbox{${\rm \bar{p}}$}}
52: \newcommand{\SU}{\mbox{$<\! |S|^2 \!>$}}
53: \newcommand{\HT}{\mbox{${S}_{T}$}}
54: \newcommand{\PT}{\mbox{$P_{T}$}}
55: \newcommand{\DP}{\mbox{$\Delta\phi$}}
56: \newcommand{\DR}{\mbox{$\Delta \Rc$}}
57: \newcommand{\DE}{\mbox{$\Delta\eta$}}
58: \newcommand{\DEP}{\mbox{$\Delta\eta_{\rm c}$}}
59: \newcommand{\PH}{\mbox{$\phi$}}
60: \newcommand{\EA}{\mbox{$\eta$} }
61: \newcommand{\EAJ}{\mbox{\EA(jet)}}
62: \newcommand{\AEA}{\mbox{$|\eta|$}}
63: \newcommand{\Ge}[1]{\mbox{#1 GeV}}
64: \newcommand{\T}[1]{\mbox{#1 TeV}}
65: \newcommand{\x}{\cdot}
66: \newcommand{\ra}{\rightarrow}
67: \newcommand{\mb}{\mbox{mb}}
68: \newcommand{\nb}{\mbox{nb}}
69: \newcommand{\ipb}{\mbox{pb$^{-1}$}}
70: \newcommand{\inb}{\mbox{nb$^{-1}$}}
71: \newcommand{\rs}{\mbox{$\sqrt{\rm s}$}}
72: \newcommand{\fdel}{\mbox{$f(\DEP)$}}
73: \newcommand{\fdele}{\mbox{$f(\DEP)^{exp}$}}
74: \newcommand{\fgap}{\mbox{$f(\DEP\! \geq \!3)$}}
75: \newcommand{\fgape}{\mbox{$f(\DEP\! \geq \!3)^{exp}$}}
76: \newcommand{\fpyt}{\mbox{$f(\DEP\!>\!2)$}}
77: \newcommand{\delth}{\mbox{$\DEP\! \geq \!3$}}
78: \newcommand{\uplim}{\mbox{$1.1\!\times\!10^{-2}$}}
79: \def\simge{\mathrel{\rlap{\raise 0.53ex \hbox{$>$}}%
80: {\lower 0.53ex \hbox{$\sim$}}}}
81: \def\simle{\mathrel{\rlap{\raise 0.53ex \hbox{$<$}}%
82: {\lower 0.53ex \hbox{$\sim$}}}}
83:
84:
85: \def\inb{nb$^{-1}$} %inverse nanobarns
86: \newcommand{\jjmass}{\mbox{$M$}}
87: \newcommand{\cteqthreem}{\mbox{CTEQ3M}}
88: \newcommand{\cteqfourm}{\mbox{CTEQ4M}}
89: \newcommand{\cteqfourhj}{\mbox{CTEQ4HJ}}
90: \newcommand{\cteqfoura}{\mbox{CTEQ4A}}
91: \newcommand{\mrsap}{\mbox{MRS{(A$^\prime$)}}}
92: \newcommand{\mrst}{\mbox{MRST}}
93: \newcommand{\mrstgu}{\mbox{MRST($g\!\uparrow$)}}
94: \newcommand{\mrstgd}{\mbox{MRST($g\!\downarrow$)}}
95: \newcommand{\modeta}{\mbox{$\mid \! \eta \! \mid$}}
96: \newcommand{\modetaonetwo}{\mbox{$\mid \! \eta_{1,2} \! \mid$}}
97: \newcommand{\modetastar}{\mbox{$\mid \! \eta^{\star} \! \mid$}}
98: \newcommand{\modetajet}{\mbox{$\mid \! \eta^{\rm jet} \! \mid$}}
99: \newcommand{\modetajetu}[1]{\mbox{$\mid \! \eta^{\rm jet#1} \! \mid$}}
100: \newcommand{\chisq}{\mbox{$\chi^{2}$}}
101: \newcommand{\als}{\mbox{${\alpha_{{\scriptscriptstyle S}}}$}}
102: \newcommand{\wprime}{\mbox{$W^{\prime}$}}
103: \newcommand{\zprime}{\mbox{$Z^{\prime}$}}
104: \newcommand{\hprime}{\mbox{$\mbox{H0}^{\prime}$}}
105: \newcommand{\trho}{\mbox{$\rho_{T}$}}
106: \newcommand{\mt}{\mbox{$m_t$}}
107: \newcommand{\qbar}{\mbox{$\overline{q}$}}
108: \newcommand{\dbar}{\mbox{$\overline{d}$}}
109: \newcommand{\ubar}{\mbox{$\overline{u}$}}
110: \newcommand{\sbar}{\mbox{$\overline{s}$}}
111: \newcommand{\cbar}{\mbox{$\overline{c}$}}
112: \newcommand{\bbar}{\mbox{$\overline{b}$}}
113: \newcommand{\tbar}{\mbox{$\overline{t}$}}
114: \newcommand{\zptodd}{\mbox{$Z^{\prime} \rightarrow d \dbar$}}
115: \newcommand{\zptouu}{\mbox{$Z^{\prime} \rightarrow u \ubar$}}
116: \newcommand{\zptoss}{\mbox{$Z^{\prime} \rightarrow s \sbar$}}
117: \newcommand{\zptocc}{\mbox{$Z^{\prime} \rightarrow c \cbar$}}
118: \newcommand{\zptobb}{\mbox{$Z^{\prime} \rightarrow b \bbar$}}
119: \newcommand{\zptott}{\mbox{$Z^{\prime} \rightarrow t \tbar$}}
120: \newcommand{\wptoud}{\mbox{$W^{\prime} \rightarrow u \dbar$}}
121: \newcommand{\wptocs}{\mbox{$W^{\prime} \rightarrow c \sbar$}}
122: \newcommand{\wptotb}{\mbox{$W^{\prime} \rightarrow t \bbar$}}
123: \def\ETmiss{\mbox{${\hbox{$E$\kern-0.5em\lower-.1ex\hbox{/}\kern+0.15em}}_T$ }}
124: \newcommand{\qstar}{\mbox{$q^{\ast}$}}
125: \newcommand{\pbarp}{\mbox{$p\overline{p}$}}
126: \newcommand{\Emeas}{\mbox{$E_{\rm jet}^{\rm meas}$}}
127: \newcommand{\Eptcl}{\mbox{$E_{\rm jet}^{\rm ptcl}$}}
128: \newcommand{\gev}{\mbox{\rm GeV}}
129:
130: \newcommand{\NC}{{\em Nuovo Cimento\/} }
131: \newcommand{\NIM}{{\em Nucl. Instr. Meth.} }
132: \newcommand{\NP}{{\em Nucl. Phys.} }
133: \newcommand{\PL}{{\em Phys. Lett.} }
134: \newcommand{\PR}{{\em Phys. Rev.} }
135: \newcommand{\PRL}{{\em Phys. Rev. Lett.} }
136: \newcommand{\RMP}{{\em Rev. Mod. Phys.} }
137: \newcommand{\ZP}{{\em Zeit. Phys.} }
138: \def\err#1#2#3 {{\it Erratum} {\bf#1},{\ #2} (19#3)}
139: \def\ib#1#2#3 {{\it ibid.} {\bf#1},{\ #2} (19#3)}
140: \def\nc#1#2#3 {Nuovo Cim. {\bf#1} ,#2(19#3)}
141: \def\nim#1#2#3 {Nucl. Instr. Meth. {\bf#1},{\ #2} (19#3)}
142: \def\np#1#2#3 {Nucl. Phys. {\bf#1},{\ #2} (19#3)}
143: \def\pl#1#2#3 {Phys. Lett. {\bf#1},{\ #2} (19#3)}
144: \def\prev#1#2#3 {Phys. Rev. {\bf#1},{\ #2} (19#3)}
145: \def\prl#1#2#3 {Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf#1},{\ #2} (19#3)}
146: \def\rmp#1#2#3 {Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf#1},{\ #2} (19#3)}
147: \def\zp#1#2#3 {Zeit. Phys. {\bf#1},{\ #2} (19#3)}
148: \def\inb{nb$^{-1}$} %inverse nanobarns
149: \newcommand{\gevcc}{\mbox{GeV/$c^2$}} %GeV/c^2
150: \def\gevc{GeV/$c$} %GeV/c
151: \def\tevcc{TeV/$c^2$} %TeV/c^2
152:
153: \begin{document}
154:
155: %\preprint{FERMILAB-Pub-97/109-E}
156: %
157: % ======> Title of the paper goes here <====================
158: %
159: \title{Measurement of the ratio of the differential cross sections
160: for $W$ and $Z$ boson production as a function of transverse momentum
161: in {\mbox{$p\bar p$}}\ collisions at
162: {\mbox{$\sqrt{s}$ =\ 1.8\ TeV}} }
163:
164: \author{\centerline{The D\O\ Collaboration
165: \thanks{Submitted to the {\it International Europhysics Conference
166: on High Energy Physics},
167: \hfill\break
168: July 12-18, 2001, Budapest, Hungary,
169: \hfill\break
170: and {\it XX International Symposium on Lepton and Photon Interactions at High Energies}
171: \hfill\break
172: July 23 -- 28, 2001, Rome, Italy.
173: }}}
174: %
175: %
176: \address{
177: \centerline{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}
178: }
179: %
180: % Indicate today's date
181: %
182: \date{\today}
183:
184: \maketitle
185: %
186: % ==============> Text of the abstract goes here <=====================
187: %
188: \begin{abstract}
189: We report on a
190: %%%
191: preliminary
192: %%%
193: measurement of the ratio of the differential cross sections
194: for $W$ and $Z$ boson production as a function of transverse momentum
195: in proton-antiproton collisions at {\mbox{$\sqrt{s}$ =\ 1.8\ TeV}}.
196: It has been shown that the ratio between $W$ and $Z$ observables
197: can be reliably calculated using perturbative QCD, even when the individual
198: observables are not. We present the first comparison between the measurement
199: of a $W$ and $Z$ observable ratio and a purely perturbative calculation.
200: The use of the ratio reduces both experimental and theoretical uncertainites
201: and might result in smaller overall uncertainties on the measured $W$ mass
202: and width, compared to currently used methods at hadron colliders.
203: \end{abstract}
204: %\pacs{PACS numbers 14.65.Ha, 13.85.Qk, 13.85.Ni}
205:
206: %\vskip 1cm
207:
208: \newpage
209: \begin{center}
210: %\input{list_of_authors.tex}
211: % LIST_OF_AUTHORS.TEX 5/18/01
212: %
213: \small{
214: %% names begin here
215: V.M.~Abazov,$^{23}$
216: B.~Abbott,$^{58}$
217: A.~Abdesselam,$^{11}$
218: M.~Abolins,$^{51}$
219: V.~Abramov,$^{26}$
220: B.S.~Acharya,$^{17}$
221: D.L.~Adams,$^{60}$
222: M.~Adams,$^{38}$
223: S.N.~Ahmed,$^{21}$
224: G.D.~Alexeev,$^{23}$
225: G.A.~Alves,$^{2}$
226: N.~Amos,$^{50}$
227: E.W.~Anderson,$^{43}$
228: Y.~Arnoud,$^{9}$
229: M.M.~Baarmand,$^{55}$
230: V.V.~Babintsev,$^{26}$
231: L.~Babukhadia,$^{55}$
232: T.C.~Bacon,$^{28}$
233: A.~Baden,$^{47}$
234: B.~Baldin,$^{37}$
235: P.W.~Balm,$^{20}$
236: S.~Banerjee,$^{17}$
237: E.~Barberis,$^{30}$
238: P.~Baringer,$^{44}$
239: J.~Barreto,$^{2}$
240: J.F.~Bartlett,$^{37}$
241: U.~Bassler,$^{12}$
242: D.~Bauer,$^{28}$
243: A.~Bean,$^{44}$
244: M.~Begel,$^{54}$
245: A.~Belyaev,$^{35}$
246: S.B.~Beri,$^{15}$
247: G.~Bernardi,$^{12}$
248: I.~Bertram,$^{27}$
249: A.~Besson,$^{9}$
250: R.~Beuselinck,$^{28}$
251: V.A.~Bezzubov,$^{26}$
252: P.C.~Bhat,$^{37}$
253: V.~Bhatnagar,$^{11}$
254: M.~Bhattacharjee,$^{55}$
255: G.~Blazey,$^{39}$
256: S.~Blessing,$^{35}$
257: A.~Boehnlein,$^{37}$
258: N.I.~Bojko,$^{26}$
259: F.~Borcherding,$^{37}$
260: K.~Bos,$^{20}$
261: A.~Brandt,$^{60}$
262: R.~Breedon,$^{31}$
263: G.~Briskin,$^{59}$
264: R.~Brock,$^{51}$
265: G.~Brooijmans,$^{37}$
266: A.~Bross,$^{37}$
267: D.~Buchholz,$^{40}$
268: M.~Buehler,$^{38}$
269: V.~Buescher,$^{14}$
270: V.S.~Burtovoi,$^{26}$
271: J.M.~Butler,$^{48}$
272: F.~Canelli,$^{54}$
273: W.~Carvalho,$^{3}$
274: D.~Casey,$^{51}$
275: Z.~Casilum,$^{55}$
276: H.~Castilla-Valdez,$^{19}$
277: D.~Chakraborty,$^{39}$
278: K.M.~Chan,$^{54}$
279: S.V.~Chekulaev,$^{26}$
280: D.K.~Cho,$^{54}$
281: S.~Choi,$^{34}$
282: S.~Chopra,$^{56}$
283: J.H.~Christenson,$^{37}$
284: M.~Chung,$^{38}$
285: D.~Claes,$^{52}$
286: A.R.~Clark,$^{30}$
287: J.~Cochran,$^{34}$
288: L.~Coney,$^{42}$
289: B.~Connolly,$^{35}$
290: W.E.~Cooper,$^{37}$
291: D.~Coppage,$^{44}$
292: S.~Cr\'ep\'e-Renaudin,$^{9}$
293: M.A.C.~Cummings,$^{39}$
294: D.~Cutts,$^{59}$
295: G.A.~Davis,$^{54}$
296: K.~Davis,$^{29}$
297: K.~De,$^{60}$
298: S.J.~de~Jong,$^{21}$
299: K.~Del~Signore,$^{50}$
300: M.~Demarteau,$^{37}$
301: R.~Demina,$^{45}$
302: P.~Demine,$^{9}$
303: D.~Denisov,$^{37}$
304: S.P.~Denisov,$^{26}$
305: S.~Desai,$^{55}$
306: H.T.~Diehl,$^{37}$
307: M.~Diesburg,$^{37}$
308: G.~Di~Loreto,$^{51}$
309: S.~Doulas,$^{49}$
310: P.~Draper,$^{60}$
311: Y.~Ducros,$^{13}$
312: L.V.~Dudko,$^{25}$
313: S.~Duensing,$^{21}$
314: L.~Duflot,$^{11}$
315: S.R.~Dugad,$^{17}$
316: A.~Duperrin,$^{10}$
317: A.~Dyshkant,$^{39}$
318: D.~Edmunds,$^{51}$
319: J.~Ellison,$^{34}$
320: V.D.~Elvira,$^{37}$
321: R.~Engelmann,$^{55}$
322: S.~Eno,$^{47}$
323: G.~Eppley,$^{62}$
324: P.~Ermolov,$^{25}$
325: O.V.~Eroshin,$^{26}$
326: J.~Estrada,$^{54}$
327: H.~Evans,$^{53}$
328: V.N.~Evdokimov,$^{26}$
329: T.~Fahland,$^{33}$
330: S.~Feher,$^{37}$
331: D.~Fein,$^{29}$
332: T.~Ferbel,$^{54}$
333: F.~Filthaut,$^{21}$
334: H.E.~Fisk,$^{37}$
335: Y.~Fisyak,$^{56}$
336: E.~Flattum,$^{37}$
337: F.~Fleuret,$^{30}$
338: M.~Fortner,$^{39}$
339: H.~Fox,$^{40}$
340: K.C.~Frame,$^{51}$
341: S.~Fu,$^{53}$
342: S.~Fuess,$^{37}$
343: E.~Gallas,$^{37}$
344: A.N.~Galyaev,$^{26}$
345: M.~Gao,$^{53}$
346: V.~Gavrilov,$^{24}$
347: R.J.~Genik~II,$^{27}$
348: K.~Genser,$^{37}$
349: C.E.~Gerber,$^{38}$
350: Y.~Gershtein,$^{59}$
351: R.~Gilmartin,$^{35}$
352: G.~Ginther,$^{54}$
353: B.~G\'{o}mez,$^{5}$
354: G.~G\'{o}mez,$^{47}$
355: P.I.~Goncharov,$^{26}$
356: J.L.~Gonz\'alez~Sol\'{\i}s,$^{19}$
357: H.~Gordon,$^{56}$
358: L.T.~Goss,$^{61}$
359: K.~Gounder,$^{37}$
360: A.~Goussiou,$^{28}$
361: N.~Graf,$^{56}$
362: G.~Graham,$^{47}$
363: P.D.~Grannis,$^{55}$
364: J.A.~Green,$^{43}$
365: H.~Greenlee,$^{37}$
366: S.~Grinstein,$^{1}$
367: L.~Groer,$^{53}$
368: S.~Gr\"unendahl,$^{37}$
369: A.~Gupta,$^{17}$
370: S.N.~Gurzhiev,$^{26}$
371: G.~Gutierrez,$^{37}$
372: P.~Gutierrez,$^{58}$
373: N.J.~Hadley,$^{47}$
374: H.~Haggerty,$^{37}$
375: S.~Hagopian,$^{35}$
376: V.~Hagopian,$^{35}$
377: R.E.~Hall,$^{32}$
378: P.~Hanlet,$^{49}$
379: S.~Hansen,$^{37}$
380: J.M.~Hauptman,$^{43}$
381: C.~Hays,$^{53}$
382: C.~Hebert,$^{44}$
383: D.~Hedin,$^{39}$
384: J.M.~Heinmiller,$^{38}$
385: A.P.~Heinson,$^{34}$
386: U.~Heintz,$^{48}$
387: T.~Heuring,$^{35}$
388: M.D.~Hildreth,$^{42}$
389: R.~Hirosky,$^{63}$
390: J.D.~Hobbs,$^{55}$
391: B.~Hoeneisen,$^{8}$
392: Y.~Huang,$^{50}$
393: R.~Illingworth,$^{28}$
394: A.S.~Ito,$^{37}$
395: M.~Jaffr\'e,$^{11}$
396: S.~Jain,$^{17}$
397: R.~Jesik,$^{28}$
398: K.~Johns,$^{29}$
399: M.~Johnson,$^{37}$
400: A.~Jonckheere,$^{37}$
401: M.~Jones,$^{36}$
402: H.~J\"ostlein,$^{37}$
403: A.~Juste,$^{37}$
404: W.~Kahl,$^{45}$
405: S.~Kahn,$^{56}$
406: E.~Kajfasz,$^{10}$
407: A.M.~Kalinin,$^{23}$
408: D.~Karmanov,$^{25}$
409: D.~Karmgard,$^{42}$
410: Z.~Ke,$^{4}$
411: R.~Kehoe,$^{51}$
412: A.~Khanov,$^{45}$
413: A.~Kharchilava,$^{42}$
414: S.K.~Kim,$^{18}$
415: B.~Klima,$^{37}$
416: B.~Knuteson,$^{30}$
417: W.~Ko,$^{31}$
418: J.M.~Kohli,$^{15}$
419: A.V.~Kostritskiy,$^{26}$
420: J.~Kotcher,$^{56}$
421: B.~Kothari,$^{53}$
422: A.V.~Kotwal,$^{53}$
423: A.V.~Kozelov,$^{26}$
424: E.A.~Kozlovsky,$^{26}$
425: J.~Krane,$^{43}$
426: M.R.~Krishnaswamy,$^{17}$
427: P.~Krivkova,$^{6}$
428: S.~Krzywdzinski,$^{37}$
429: M.~Kubantsev,$^{45}$
430: S.~Kuleshov,$^{24}$
431: Y.~Kulik,$^{55}$
432: S.~Kunori,$^{47}$
433: A.~Kupco,$^{7}$
434: V.E.~Kuznetsov,$^{34}$
435: G.~Landsberg,$^{59}$
436: W.M.~Lee,$^{35}$
437: A.~Leflat,$^{25}$
438: C.~Leggett,$^{30}$
439: F.~Lehner,$^{37,*}$
440: J.~Li,$^{60}$
441: Q.Z.~Li,$^{37}$
442: X.~Li,$^{4}$
443: J.G.R.~Lima,$^{3}$
444: D.~Lincoln,$^{37}$
445: S.L.~Linn,$^{35}$
446: J.~Linnemann,$^{51}$
447: R.~Lipton,$^{37}$
448: A.~Lucotte,$^{9}$
449: L.~Lueking,$^{37}$
450: C.~Lundstedt,$^{52}$
451: C.~Luo,$^{41}$
452: A.K.A.~Maciel,$^{39}$
453: R.J.~Madaras,$^{30}$
454: V.L.~Malyshev,$^{23}$
455: V.~Manankov,$^{25}$
456: H.S.~Mao,$^{4}$
457: T.~Marshall,$^{41}$
458: M.I.~Martin,$^{39}$
459: R.D.~Martin,$^{38}$
460: K.M.~Mauritz,$^{43}$
461: B.~May,$^{40}$
462: A.A.~Mayorov,$^{41}$
463: R.~McCarthy,$^{55}$
464: T.~McMahon,$^{57}$
465: H.L.~Melanson,$^{37}$
466: M.~Merkin,$^{25}$
467: K.W.~Merritt,$^{37}$
468: C.~Miao,$^{59}$
469: H.~Miettinen,$^{62}$
470: D.~Mihalcea,$^{39}$
471: C.S.~Mishra,$^{37}$
472: N.~Mokhov,$^{37}$
473: N.K.~Mondal,$^{17}$
474: H.E.~Montgomery,$^{37}$
475: R.W.~Moore,$^{51}$
476: M.~Mostafa,$^{1}$
477: H.~da~Motta,$^{2}$
478: E.~Nagy,$^{10}$
479: F.~Nang,$^{29}$
480: M.~Narain,$^{48}$
481: V.S.~Narasimham,$^{17}$
482: H.A.~Neal,$^{50}$
483: J.P.~Negret,$^{5}$
484: S.~Negroni,$^{10}$
485: T.~Nunnemann,$^{37}$
486: D.~O'Neil,$^{51}$
487: V.~Oguri,$^{3}$
488: B.~Olivier,$^{12}$
489: N.~Oshima,$^{37}$
490: P.~Padley,$^{62}$
491: L.J.~Pan,$^{40}$
492: K.~Papageorgiou,$^{38}$
493: A.~Para,$^{37}$
494: N.~Parashar,$^{49}$
495: R.~Partridge,$^{59}$
496: N.~Parua,$^{55}$
497: M.~Paterno,$^{54}$
498: A.~Patwa,$^{55}$
499: B.~Pawlik,$^{22}$
500: J.~Perkins,$^{60}$
501: M.~Peters,$^{36}$
502: O.~Peters,$^{20}$
503: P.~P\'etroff,$^{11}$
504: R.~Piegaia,$^{1}$
505: B.G.~Pope,$^{51}$
506: E.~Popkov,$^{48}$
507: H.B.~Prosper,$^{35}$
508: S.~Protopopescu,$^{56}$
509: J.~Qian,$^{50}$
510: R.~Raja,$^{37}$
511: S.~Rajagopalan,$^{56}$
512: E.~Ramberg,$^{37}$
513: P.A.~Rapidis,$^{37}$
514: N.W.~Reay,$^{45}$
515: S.~Reucroft,$^{49}$
516: M.~Ridel,$^{11}$
517: M.~Rijssenbeek,$^{55}$
518: F.~Rizatdinova,$^{45}$
519: T.~Rockwell,$^{51}$
520: M.~Roco,$^{37}$
521: P.~Rubinov,$^{37}$
522: R.~Ruchti,$^{42}$
523: J.~Rutherfoord,$^{29}$
524: B.M.~Sabirov,$^{23}$
525: G.~Sajot,$^{9}$
526: A.~Santoro,$^{2}$
527: L.~Sawyer,$^{46}$
528: R.D.~Schamberger,$^{55}$
529: H.~Schellman,$^{40}$
530: A.~Schwartzman,$^{1}$
531: N.~Sen,$^{62}$
532: E.~Shabalina,$^{38}$
533: R.K.~Shivpuri,$^{16}$
534: D.~Shpakov,$^{49}$
535: M.~Shupe,$^{29}$
536: R.A.~Sidwell,$^{45}$
537: V.~Simak,$^{7}$
538: H.~Singh,$^{34}$
539: J.B.~Singh,$^{15}$
540: V.~Sirotenko,$^{37}$
541: P.~Slattery,$^{54}$
542: E.~Smith,$^{58}$
543: R.P.~Smith,$^{37}$
544: R.~Snihur,$^{40}$
545: G.R.~Snow,$^{52}$
546: J.~Snow,$^{57}$
547: S.~Snyder,$^{56}$
548: J.~Solomon,$^{38}$
549: V.~Sor\'{\i}n,$^{1}$
550: M.~Sosebee,$^{60}$
551: N.~Sotnikova,$^{25}$
552: K.~Soustruznik,$^{6}$
553: M.~Souza,$^{2}$
554: N.R.~Stanton,$^{45}$
555: G.~Steinbr\"uck,$^{53}$
556: R.W.~Stephens,$^{60}$
557: F.~Stichelbaut,$^{56}$
558: D.~Stoker,$^{33}$
559: V.~Stolin,$^{24}$
560: A.~Stone,$^{46}$
561: D.A.~Stoyanova,$^{26}$
562: M.~Strauss,$^{58}$
563: M.~Strovink,$^{30}$
564: L.~Stutte,$^{37}$
565: A.~Sznajder,$^{3}$
566: M.~Talby,$^{10}$
567: W.~Taylor,$^{55}$
568: S.~Tentindo-Repond,$^{35}$
569: S.M.~Tripathi,$^{31}$
570: T.G.~Trippe,$^{30}$
571: A.S.~Turcot,$^{56}$
572: P.M.~Tuts,$^{53}$
573: P.~van~Gemmeren,$^{37}$
574: V.~Vaniev,$^{26}$
575: R.~Van~Kooten,$^{41}$
576: N.~Varelas,$^{38}$
577: L.S.~Vertogradov,$^{23}$
578: F.~Villeneuve-Seguier,$^{10}$
579: A.A.~Volkov,$^{26}$
580: A.P.~Vorobiev,$^{26}$
581: H.D.~Wahl,$^{35}$
582: H.~Wang,$^{40}$
583: Z.-M.~Wang,$^{55}$
584: J.~Warchol,$^{42}$
585: G.~Watts,$^{64}$
586: M.~Wayne,$^{42}$
587: H.~Weerts,$^{51}$
588: A.~White,$^{60}$
589: J.T.~White,$^{61}$
590: D.~Whiteson,$^{30}$
591: J.A.~Wightman,$^{43}$
592: D.A.~Wijngaarden,$^{21}$
593: S.~Willis,$^{39}$
594: S.J.~Wimpenny,$^{34}$
595: J.~Womersley,$^{37}$
596: D.R.~Wood,$^{49}$
597: R.~Yamada,$^{37}$
598: P.~Yamin,$^{56}$
599: T.~Yasuda,$^{37}$
600: Y.A.~Yatsunenko,$^{23}$
601: K.~Yip,$^{56}$
602: S.~Youssef,$^{35}$
603: J.~Yu,$^{37}$
604: Z.~Yu,$^{40}$
605: M.~Zanabria,$^{5}$
606: H.~Zheng,$^{42}$
607: Z.~Zhou,$^{43}$
608: M.~Zielinski,$^{54}$
609: D.~Zieminska,$^{41}$
610: A.~Zieminski,$^{41}$
611: V.~Zutshi,$^{56}$
612: E.G.~Zverev,$^{25}$
613: and~A.~Zylberstejn$^{13}$
614: \\
615: \vskip 0.30cm
616: \centerline{(D\O\ Collaboration)}
617: \vskip 0.30cm
618: }
619: %\address{
620: \small{\it
621: \centerline{$^{1}$Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina}
622: \centerline{$^{2}$LAFEX, Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas F{\'\i}sicas,
623: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil}
624: \centerline{$^{3}$Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro,
625: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil}
626: \centerline{$^{4}$Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing,
627: People's Republic of China}
628: \centerline{$^{5}$Universidad de los Andes, Bogot\'{a}, Colombia}
629: \centerline{$^{6}$Charles University, Center for Particle Physics,
630: Prague, Czech Republic}
631: \centerline{$^{7}$Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences, Center
632: for Particle Physics, Prague, Czech Republic}
633: \centerline{$^{8}$Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador}
634: \centerline{$^{9}$Institut des Sciences Nucl\'eaires, IN2P3-CNRS,
635: Universite de Grenoble 1, Grenoble, France}
636: \centerline{$^{10}$CPPM, IN2P3-CNRS, Universit\'e de la M\'editerran\'ee,
637: Marseille, France}
638: \centerline{$^{11}$Laboratoire de l'Acc\'el\'erateur Lin\'eaire,
639: IN2P3-CNRS, Orsay, France}
640: \centerline{$^{12}$LPNHE, Universit\'es Paris VI and VII, IN2P3-CNRS,
641: Paris, France}
642: \centerline{$^{13}$DAPNIA/Service de Physique des Particules, CEA, Saclay,
643: France}
644: \centerline{$^{14}$Universit{\"a}t Mainz, Institut f{\"u}r Physik,
645: Mainz, Germany}
646: \centerline{$^{15}$Panjab University, Chandigarh, India}
647: \centerline{$^{16}$Delhi University, Delhi, India}
648: \centerline{$^{17}$Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, India}
649: \centerline{$^{18}$Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea}
650: \centerline{$^{19}$CINVESTAV, Mexico City, Mexico}
651: \centerline{$^{20}$FOM-Institute NIKHEF and University of
652: Amsterdam/NIKHEF, Amsterdam, The Netherlands}
653: \centerline{$^{21}$University of Nijmegen/NIKHEF, Nijmegen, The
654: Netherlands}
655: \centerline{$^{22}$Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krak\'ow, Poland}
656: \centerline{$^{23}$Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia}
657: \centerline{$^{24}$Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics,
658: Moscow, Russia}
659: \centerline{$^{25}$Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia}
660: \centerline{$^{26}$Institute for High Energy Physics, Protvino, Russia}
661: \centerline{$^{27}$Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom}
662: \centerline{$^{28}$Imperial College, London, United Kingdom}
663: \centerline{$^{29}$University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721}
664: \centerline{$^{30}$Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and University of
665: California, Berkeley, California 94720}
666: \centerline{$^{31}$University of California, Davis, California 95616}
667: \centerline{$^{32}$California State University, Fresno, California 93740}
668: \centerline{$^{33}$University of California, Irvine, California 92697}
669: \centerline{$^{34}$University of California, Riverside, California 92521}
670: \centerline{$^{35}$Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306}
671: \centerline{$^{36}$University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822}
672: \centerline{$^{37}$Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia,
673: Illinois 60510}
674: \centerline{$^{38}$University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago,
675: Illinois 60607}
676: \centerline{$^{39}$Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois 60115}
677: \centerline{$^{40}$Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208}
678: \centerline{$^{41}$Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405}
679: \centerline{$^{42}$University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
680: \centerline{$^{43}$Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011}
681: \centerline{$^{44}$University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045}
682: \centerline{$^{45}$Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506}
683: \centerline{$^{46}$Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, Louisiana 71272}
684: \centerline{$^{47}$University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742}
685: \centerline{$^{48}$Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215}
686: \centerline{$^{49}$Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115}
687: \centerline{$^{50}$University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109}
688: \centerline{$^{51}$Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824}
689: \centerline{$^{52}$University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588}
690: \centerline{$^{53}$Columbia University, New York, New York 10027}
691: \centerline{$^{54}$University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627}
692: \centerline{$^{55}$State University of New York, Stony Brook,
693: New York 11794}
694: \centerline{$^{56}$Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973}
695: \centerline{$^{57}$Langston University, Langston, Oklahoma 73050}
696: \centerline{$^{58}$University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019}
697: \centerline{$^{59}$Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912}
698: \centerline{$^{60}$University of Texas, Arlington, Texas 76019}
699: \centerline{$^{61}$Texas A\&M University, College Station, Texas 77843}
700: \centerline{$^{62}$Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005}
701: \centerline{$^{63}$University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22901}
702: \centerline{$^{64}$University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195}
703: \vskip 0.5 cm
704: \centerline{$^{*}$ Visitor from University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.}
705: }
706: %end
707:
708: \end{center}
709:
710: \normalsize
711:
712: \vfill\eject
713:
714:
715: \section{Introduction}
716: The D\O\ Collaboration
717: has recently published~\cite{wpt,zpt} measurements of the
718: differential cross sections for $W$ and $Z$ boson production
719: as a function of transverse momentum $p_T$. Both measurements are in good
720: agreement with combined resummed and perturbative QCD models, such
721: as those in references~\cite{ak,ly,ev}. For the analyses based on data taken
722: by D\O\ during 1992--1996 (Tevatron Run 1), we have
723: used the resummed calculation of Ref.~\cite{ly} fitted to our own Drell--Yan
724: data to determine the non-perturbative phenomenological parameters of the
725: theory. The resummed calculation was then used to predict
726: $W$ boson observables such as the
727: electron and neutrino transverse momenta. These predictions are used as
728: input to a Monte
729: Carlo model of $W$ boson production and decay, which is used in our published
730: measurements of the $W$ boson mass~\cite{wmass}
731: and $W$ boson production cross section~\cite{xsections}.
732:
733: Reference~\cite{gk} proposes an alternative method of predicting $W$ boson
734: observables from measured $Z$ boson quantities using the theoretical
735: ratio of the $W$ to $Z$ boson differential cross sections with respect
736: to variables that have been scaled by the corresponding vector boson masses.
737: Because $W$ and $Z$ boson production properties are very similar,
738: the large radiative corrections that affect the individual distributions
739: cancel when calculating the ratio.
740: The ratio can therefore be reliably
741: calculated using perturbative QCD (pQCD),
742: with no need for resummation, even for
743: small values of the transverse momenta of the vector bosons.
744: In fact, as the transverse momentum of the vector boson becomes smaller,
745: the radiative corrections factorize from the hard process and cancel when
746: taking the ratio. The theoretical uncertainties are therefore well
747: understood, and smallest, at very low $p_T$.
748:
749: The basic proposal
750: is to combine pQCD calculations with the measured
751: $Z$ boson observables to extract the $W$ boson observables. This method
752: is exemplified and tested here
753: using the $W$ and $Z$ boson differential cross
754: sections as a function of transverse momentum. The main
755: difference between the $W$ and the $Z$ boson production properties
756: is due to the
757: difference in the $W$ and $Z$ boson masses.
758: We therefore work with vector boson variables that have been scaled by
759: the corresponding vector boson mass $m_V$.
760:
761: The ratio of differential cross sections with respect to the scaled $W$ and
762: $Z$ boson transverse momenta $p_T^W/m_W$ and $p_T^Z/m_Z$ is defined as
763: %
764: \begin{equation}
765: R_{p_T}=\left(\frac{d\sigma^W}{dp_T^W/m_W}\right) {\Big /}
766: \left( \frac{d\sigma^Z}{dp_T^Z/m_Z} \right) ,
767: \label{eq:ratiodef}
768: \end{equation}
769: %
770: where $d\sigma^V/dp_T^V$ is the differential cross section for
771: vector boson production $\sigma(p\bar p \to V + X)$ with respect to
772: the vector boson transverse momentum $p_T^V$.
773: Equation~\ref{eq:ratiodef} can be used to predict the differential
774: cross section for $W$ bosons with respect to the non-scaled
775: transverse momentum:
776: %
777: \begin{equation}
778: \left. \frac{d\sigma^W}{dp_T^W} \right|_{\rm predicted}=
779: \frac{m_Z}{m_W} \times R_{p_T} \times
780: \left. \frac{d\sigma^Z}{dp_T^Z} \right|_{\rm measured}^{p_T^Z=\frac{m_Z}{m_W} p_T^W} ,
781: \label{eq:wptdef}
782: \end{equation}
783: where $R_{p_T}$ is calculated using pQCD.
784: In this paper, we present the first measurement of $R_{p_T}$, and confront it
785: with the calculation of Ref.~\cite{gk}.
786:
787: Next, we use our measured differential $Z$ boson cross section,
788: Eq.~\ref{eq:wptdef}
789: and Ref.~\cite{gk} to obtain the differential
790: $W$ boson cross section and compare it to our
791: published result~\cite{wpt}.
792:
793: Compared to the method previously used to extract $W$ boson observables,
794: the present ratio method reduces
795: both theoretical and experimental systematic uncertainties. However,
796: it introduces a statistical contribution to the uncertainty
797: from the number of events in the $Z$ boson candidate sample.
798: Such a trade--off will eventually
799: result in smaller overall uncertainties, especially when used
800: with the high statistics samples expected during Run 2 at the Tevatron.
801:
802:
803: \section{Data Selection}
804: We keep the modifications to the published D\O\
805: analyses~\cite{wpt,zpt} to a minimum,
806: but, at the same time, we try to cancel as many experimental
807: uncertainties as possible when measuring the ratio $R_{p_T}$. The
808: uncertainty in the integrated luminosity of the data samples ($4.3\%$) is the
809: dominant uncertainty in the individual cross section measurements.
810: It cancels completely when taking the ratio, as long as the same
811: data sets are used to select the $W$ and $Z$ boson candidate samples.
812: In this analysis, we keep the event selection and
813: corrections for background, efficiency, acceptance and detector resolutions
814: identical to the ones in the published results~\cite{wpt,zpt},
815: but require that the same data--taking runs be included in the
816: $W$ and $Z$ boson event samples. In addition, we exclude events for which
817: large beam losses from the Main Ring accelerator were
818: expected~\cite{xsections}. These beam losses can create significant
819: energy deposits in the calorimeter, resulting in events with large false
820: transverse momentum imbalance, that could pass our $W$ selection cuts.
821: Due to these additional requirements,
822: the $Z$ boson sample is reduced from 6407 to 4881 events.
823: About half of the event losses are due to the tightening of the
824: beam quality conditions, while the other half are events taken during runs
825: for which there was no $W$ trigger present or it was prescaled.
826: The $W$ sample is reduced from 50488 to 50264 events when we remove
827: runs for which the $W$ trigger was prescaled.
828: The integrated luminosity for both samples is $(84.5 \pm 3.6)\rm pb^{-1}$.
829:
830: We have investigated whether
831: additional sources of error could be cancelled in the
832: ratio. There are four sources of systematic error that contribute
833: to the $W$ and $Z$ boson cross sections.
834: These arise from uncertainties in the background estimate, the event selection
835: efficiency and the unfolding procedure used to correct for acceptance and
836: detector resolution.
837:
838: The dominant sources of background in both the
839: $W$ and the $Z$ boson analyses come from multijet and photon--jet events, where
840: the jets pass our electron identification criteria. In the case of the $W$,
841: a large imbalance in the transverse energy has to arise to fake the presence
842: of a neutrino. The mechanisms for multijet or photon--jet events
843: to fake a $W$ or a $Z$ boson event
844: are different, and the methods used to estimate the background are completely
845: independent. We therefore cannot cancel any contribution to the error in the
846: ratio from the background estimates.
847:
848: The acceptance and unfolding corrections are applied
849: together using a parametric
850: Monte Carlo~\cite{wmass}. The main contribution to the error comes from the
851: detector modeling. For the $W$ analysis, we rely on the measurement of the
852: energy of the recoiling hadrons, whereas the $Z$ boson measurement uses the
853: measurement of the electromagnetic energy
854: from the electrons. We therefore do not attempt any cancellation of errors
855: in the acceptance/unfolding procedure either.
856:
857: The uncertainty in the
858: efficiency has contributions from the trigger and offline
859: electron identification. The Level 0 trigger,
860: which requires the detection
861: of an inelastic collision via simultaneous hits in the forward and
862: backward Level 0 scintillation detectors~\cite{d0detector},
863: is common for $W$ and $Z$ boson events.
864: The uncertainty in this trigger can therefore be completely cancelled
865: in the ratio. However, its contribution to the error on the
866: efficiency is negligible (0.5\% out of a total of 3.5\%).
867:
868: Although the triggers and the offline electron identification
869: used in the $W$ and $Z$ boson analyses are different,
870: the main contribution to the error in the efficiency (3\%) comes from
871: a common source, the so-called $u_{||}$ efficiency~\cite{wmass}.
872: This inefficiency arises
873: when the energy flow close to the electron increases as the recoiling
874: hadrons
875: approach the electron. It is therefore a topological effect produced
876: by the proximity of the electron to the jet, which has the largest effect
877: at a boson transverse momentum of about $20\;\rm GeV$~\cite{zpt}.
878: The parameterization of the $u_{||}$ efficiency
879: is done on an electron--by--electron
880: basis in the parametric Monte Carlo.
881: The error on the $u_{||}$ efficiency is estimated from Herwig~\cite{herwig}
882: $W$ and $Z$ boson
883: events, overlayed with data taken from randomly selected
884: {\mbox{$p\bar p$}}\ collisions. Because this
885: inefficiency depends on the proximity between electrons and jets
886: in the event, it is difficult to estimate {\it a priori}
887: how much of the uncertainty in the
888: $u_{||}$ efficiency cancels in the ratio.
889: To determine if further investigations of the possible
890: cancellation of the $u_{||}$ efficiency error are worthwhile, we estimated
891: the effect on the $R_{p_{T}}$
892: measurement of cancelling the contribution from the
893: $u_{||}$ efficiency error completely. This resulted in a maximum
894: reduction on the uncertainty on the ratio of less than 5\%.
895: We therefore conclude that no error
896: cancellations beyond the errors in the luminosity would improve
897: the ratio measurement significantly.
898:
899: \section{Scaled $W$ and $Z$ Boson Cross Sections}
900:
901: Equation~(\ref{eq:ratiodef}) can be written
902: %
903: \begin{equation}
904: R_{p_T}^{th}=\left(\frac{d\sigma^W}{dp_T^W}\right) {\Big /}
905: \left( \frac{d\sigma^Z}{d(p_T^Z \times m_W/m_Z)} \right)
906: = \left(\frac{d\sigma^W}{dp_T^W}\right) {\Big /}
907: \left( \frac{d\sigma^Z}{dp_T^{Z \prime}} \right) ,
908: \label{eq:ratiodef2}
909: \end{equation}
910: %
911:
912: \noindent
913: where we have defined
914: %
915: \begin{equation}
916: p_T^{Z \prime} = \frac{m_W}{m_Z} p_T^Z .
917: \label{eq:zptprime}
918: \end{equation}
919:
920: \noindent
921: We use the value from the Particle Data Book~\cite{pdb} for the mass ratio
922: %
923: \begin{equation}
924: \frac{m_W}{m_Z}=0.8820\pm0.0005 .
925: \label{eq:massratio}
926: \end{equation}
927:
928: \noindent
929: In order to measure the scaled distributions without changing the
930: binning of both the $W$ and the $Z$
931: boson analyses, we kept the $W$ bin boundaries
932: ($\delta_i$) identical to the ones used in the published result. Since
933: we require the same bin widths for the scaled variables $p_T^W/m_W$
934: and $p_T^Z/m_Z$, we set the bin boundaries in the differential $Z$ boson
935: cross section to
936: %
937: \begin{equation}
938: \delta_i \times \frac{m_Z}{m_W} = \delta_i/0.8820,
939: \end{equation}
940: and recompute the differential $Z$ boson cross section.
941:
942: Table~\ref{tab:d0data} shows the modified results for the
943: $W$ and $Z$ boson cross sections. The statistical
944: and systematic contributions to the individual
945: cross section uncertainties are shown separately. One can see that
946: the error on the ratio will be dominated by the systematic error
947: on the $W$ cross section.
948:
949:
950:
951: %\clearpage
952: \section{Measurement of $R_{p_T}$}
953:
954: Based on the measured $W$ and $Z$ boson differential cross sections listed in
955: Table~\ref{tab:d0data}, we extract the ratio of scaled cross sections
956: \begin{equation}
957: R_{p_T}^{exp}=\left[ \left(\frac{d\sigma^W}{dp_T^W}\right) {\Big /}
958: \left( \frac{d\sigma^Z}{dp_T^Z} \right)\right] \times
959: \frac{m_W}{m_Z}\times \frac{Br(Z\to ee)}{Br(W\to e\nu)} .
960: \label{eq:dataratio}
961: \end{equation}
962: Note that the prediction for $R_{p_T}$~\cite{gk} was calculated for the
963: ratio of the scaled $W$ and $Z$ boson differential cross sections
964: $d\sigma^V/dp_T^V$, and we
965: measure the differential cross sections times their branching fractions to
966: electrons $(d\sigma^V/dp_T^V)\times Br(V \to e)$. We therefore
967: need to multiply our measurement by the ratio of the
968: $Z$ to $W$ boson branching fractions, which we obtain from the
969: particle data book~\cite{pdb}:
970: \begin{equation}
971: Br(Z\to ee)=0.03367 \pm 0.00005
972: \end{equation}
973: \begin{equation}
974: Br(W\to e\nu)=0.1066 \pm 0.0020 .
975: \end{equation}
976: The result is shown in Figure~\ref{fig:rpt} and summarized in
977: Table~\ref{tab:ratio}.
978: The data are plotted at the value of
979: $p_T$ for which the theoretical prediction for $R_{p_T}$ is equal to its
980: average over the bin, following the prescription of reference~\cite{xbins}.
981: We observe that the measured differential cross section
982: ratio agrees well with the purely pQCD theoretical
983: prediction~\cite{gk},
984: even at small values of $p_T$. The $\chi ^2$ test for the comparison
985: between data and theory is $18.7$ for 21 degrees of freedom.
986:
987:
988:
989:
990: \section{Extraction of $\dsdpt$}
991: Based on Eq.~\ref{eq:wptdef}, we
992: use the calculated ratio $R_{p_T}$ from reference~\cite{gk},
993: together with the measured
994: $d\sigma^Z/dp_T^Z$, to predict the $W$ boson transverse
995: momentum spectrum and
996: compare it with our previously measured $d\sigma^W/dp_T^W$~\cite{wpt}.
997: The result is
998: shown in Figure~\ref{fig:wpt}. The measured differential cross section
999: is plotted at the center of the bin.
1000: The ratio method prediction upper and lower 68\% confidence level
1001: limits are plotted as histograms.
1002: The extracted transverse momentum distribution agrees very well with the
1003: measurement; the Kolmogorov--Smirnov probability~\cite{kstest}
1004: $\kappa$ is equal to 1.
1005:
1006: \section{Conclusions}
1007: We have measured the ratio of the scaled differential cross sections
1008: for $W$ to $Z$ boson production for the first time, and compared it to a purely
1009: pQCD prediction.
1010: %%
1011: Our preliminary measurement shows good agreement with theory
1012: %%
1013: %We observe good agreement between data and theory
1014: over the whole $p_T$ spectrum, even at small values of $p_T$.
1015:
1016: We have used the theoretical prediction
1017: for $R_{p_T}$, together with our measurement of the differential $Z$ boson
1018: production cross section, to obtain the $W$ differential cross section.
1019: This prediction agrees well with our published result.
1020:
1021: This method for
1022: predicting $W$ properties should eventually
1023: result in smaller overall uncertainties
1024: on the measured $W$ mass
1025: and width, compared to currently used methods at hadron colliders, once
1026: the high statistics $Z$ boson samples expected during Run 2 at the Tevatron
1027: become available.
1028:
1029: \section*{Acknowledgements}
1030: \label{sec:ack}
1031: %
1032: % =========> Choose the first acknowledgements paragraph <==========
1033: % =========> if you are writing a physics paper. <==================
1034: %
1035: We thank Stephane Keller for interesting discussions
1036: leading to this measurement and Walter Giele for
1037: providing the theoretical prediction and assistance with technical
1038: details to complete this measurement.
1039: % Acknowledgement_paragraph.tex
1040: %
1041: We thank the staffs at Fermilab and collaborating institutions,
1042: and acknowledge support from the
1043: Department of Energy and National Science Foundation (USA),
1044: Commissariat \` a L'Energie Atomique and
1045: CNRS/Institut National de Physique Nucl\'eaire et
1046: de Physique des Particules (France),
1047: Ministry for Science and Technology and Ministry for Atomic
1048: Energy (Russia),
1049: CAPES and CNPq (Brazil),
1050: Departments of Atomic Energy and Science and Education (India),
1051: Colciencias (Colombia),
1052: CONACyT (Mexico),
1053: Ministry of Education and KOSEF (Korea),
1054: CONICET and UBACyT (Argentina),
1055: The Foundation for Fundamental Research on Matter (The Netherlands),
1056: PPARC (United Kingdom),
1057: Ministry of Education (Czech Republic),
1058: and the A.P.~Sloan Foundation.
1059: %
1060:
1061:
1062:
1063: %LIST_OF_VISITOR_ADDRESSES.TEX
1064: %\input{list_of_visitor_addresses.tex}
1065: %%%%%
1066: \begin{references}
1067:
1068: \bibitem{wpt} D\O\ Collaboration, V.\ M.\ Abazov {\etal}.
1069: Accepted by Phys. Lett. {\bf B},
1070: FERMILAB-Pub-00/268-E, hep-ex/0010026.
1071: \bibitem{zpt} D\O\ Collaboration, B.\ Abbott {\etal}.
1072: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D61}, 032004 (2000), and Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\
1073: {\bf 84}, 2792 (2000).
1074: \bibitem{ak} P.\ Arnold and R.\ Kauffman,
1075: Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B349}, 381 (1991).
1076: %
1077: \bibitem{ly} G.\ A.\ Ladinsky and C.\ P.\ Yuan
1078: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D50}, 4239 (1994).
1079: %
1080: \bibitem{ev} R.~K.~Ellis and S.~Veseli,
1081: Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B511}, 649 (1998).
1082: %
1083: \bibitem{wmass} D\O\ Collaboration, S.\ Abachi {\etal}.
1084: Phys.\ Rev.\ Letters {\bf 77}, 3309 (1996); Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D58},
1085: 12002 (1998); Phys.\ Rev.\ Letters {\bf 80}, 3008 (1998);
1086: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D58}, 092003 (1998); Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D62}, 092006 (2000);
1087: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 84}, 222 (2000).
1088: %
1089: \bibitem{xsections} D\O\ Collaboration, B.\ Abbott {\etal}.
1090: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D 61}, 072001 (2000).
1091: %
1092: \bibitem{gk} W.~T.~Giele and S.~Keller,
1093: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D57}, 4433 (1998).
1094: %
1095: \bibitem{d0detector} D\O\ Collaboration, S.\ Abachi {\etal}.
1096: Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Methods {\bf A 338}, 185 (1994).
1097: \bibitem{pdb} D.~Groom {\etal}.
1098: The European Physical Journal {\bf C15} (2000).
1099: %
1100: \bibitem{herwig} G. Marchesini {\etal}.
1101: Comput. Phys. Commun. {\bf 67}, 465 (1992).
1102: %
1103: \bibitem{xbins} G.~Lafferty and T.~Wyatt,
1104: Nuclear Instruments and Methods {\bf A 355}, 541 (1995).
1105: %
1106: \bibitem{kstest} This test returns a confidence level $\kappa$ that is
1107: uniformly distributed between 0 and 1 if the two spectra derive from the same
1108: parent distribution. See, e.g., A.\ G.\ Frodesen, O.\ Skjeggestad, and
1109: H.\ T{\o}fte, ``Probability and Statistics in Particle Physics.'' Columbia
1110: University Press, New York (1979).
1111:
1112: \end{references}
1113: \clearpage
1114: \begin{table}[t]
1115: \caption{Summary of the measured differential $W$
1116: and $Z$ bosons production cross sections as a function
1117: of transverse momentum used to calculate the ratio.
1118: The error on the ratio is dominated by the systematic error
1119: on the $W$ cross section.}
1120: \begin{center}
1121: \begin{tabular}{||c|c|c|c|c|c|c||}
1122: Bins & {\mbox{$\frac{d\sigma(W\to e \nu)}{dp_T^{W}}$}}&
1123: Stat Error & Syst Error &
1124: {\mbox{$\frac{d\sigma(Z\to e^+ e^-)}{dp_T^Z}$}}& Stat Error
1125: & Syst Error\\
1126: \scriptsize{(GeV)} & \scriptsize{(pb/GeV)} & \scriptsize{(pb/GeV)} &
1127: \scriptsize{(pb/GeV)} & \scriptsize{(pb/GeV)}
1128: & \scriptsize{(pb/GeV)} & \scriptsize{(pb/GeV)} \\
1129: \hline \hline %$
1130: 0-2 & 109.48 & 4.61 & 12.35 & 11.94 & 0.53 & 0.35 \\ \hline
1131: 2-4 & 206.21 & 6.85 & 24.64 & 19.63 & 0.65 & 0.57 \\ \hline
1132: 4-6 & 171.32 & 5.65 & 9.29 & 14.34 & 0.53 & 0.44 \\ \hline
1133: 6-8 & 133.60 & 4.65 & 9.46 & 11.19 & 0.48 & 0.36 \\ \hline
1134: 8-10 & 103.48 & 4.04 & 6.95 & 8.05 & 0.41 & 0.27 \\ \hline
1135: 10-12 & 77.46 & 3.46 & 7.25 & 6.18 & 0.37 & 0.21 \\ \hline
1136: 12-14 & 63.58 & 3.20 & 4.16 & 4.74 & 0.33 & 0.15 \\ \hline
1137: 14-16 & 47.77& 2.77 & 4.29 & 3.39 & 0.28 & 0.11 \\ \hline
1138: 16-18 & 37.67 & 2.42 & 2.73 & 3.27 & 0.28 & 0.17 \\ \hline
1139: 18-20 & 30.50 & 2.20 & 1.74 & 1.94 & 0.22 & 0.11 \\ \hline
1140: 20-25 & 22.02 & 1.23 & 1.22 & 1.59& 0.12 & 0.08 \\ \hline
1141: 25-30 & 13.94& 0.93 & 1.07 & 0.946 & 0.097 & 0.051 \\ \hline
1142: 30-35 & 9.51 & 0.73 & 0.84 & 0.848 & 0.092 & 0.043 \\ \hline
1143: 35-40 & 6.79& 0.63 & 0.51& 0.435& 0.066 & 0.022 \\ \hline
1144: 40-50 & 3.96 & 0.37 & 0.31 & 0.325 & 0.040 & 0.016 \\ \hline
1145: 50-60 & 1.82 & 0.25 & 0.25 & 0.180 & 0.029 & 0.009 \\ \hline
1146: 60-70 & 1.14 & 0.20 & 0.23 & 0.0848 & 0.0197 & 0.0045 \\ \hline
1147: 70-80 & 0.749 & 0.178 & 0.170 & 0.0385 & 0.0129 & 0.0020 \\ \hline
1148: 80-100 & 0.310& 0.059 & 0.088 & 0.0141 & 0.0054 & 0.0008 \\ \hline
1149: 100-120 & 0.0822& 0.0287& 0.0255 & 0.00764& 0.00383 & 0.00032 \\ \hline
1150: 120-160 & 0.0433& 0.0119& 0.0118& 0.00358& 0.00180 & 0.00018 \\ \hline
1151: 160-200 & 0.00769& 0.00545 & 0.00482& 0.00163& 0.00111 & 0.00010 \\
1152: \end{tabular}
1153: \end{center}
1154: \label{tab:d0data}
1155: \end{table}
1156:
1157:
1158:
1159: \clearpage
1160:
1161: \begin{table}[t]
1162: \caption{Measured $R_{p_T}$. The uncertainty in the luminosity
1163: of the $W$ and $Z$ samples cancels completely when taking the
1164: ratio. No further error cancellation is attempted.}
1165: \begin{center}
1166: \begin{tabular}{ ||c|c|c|c||}
1167: Bins \scriptsize{(GeV)} & $p_T$ \scriptsize{(GeV)} & $R_{p_T}$ & Error \\
1168: \hline \hline %$
1169: 0-2 & 1.21 & 2.555 & 0.340 \\ \hline
1170: 2-4 & 2.81 & 2.927 & 0.388 \\ \hline
1171: 4-6 & 4.83 & 3.327 & 0.273 \\ \hline
1172: 6-8 & 6.84 & 3.326 & 0.323 \\ \hline
1173: 8-10 & 8.85 & 3.580 & 0.360 \\ \hline
1174: 10-12 & 10.86 & 3.494 & 0.439\\ \hline
1175: 12-14 & 12.87 & 3.739 & 0.426 \\ \hline
1176: 14-16 & 14.88 & 3.921 & 0.550 \\ \hline
1177: 16-18 & 16.89 & 3.208 & 0.450 \\ \hline
1178: 18-20 & 18.90 & 4.380 & 0.683\\ \hline
1179: 20-25 & 22.52 & 3.854 & 0.479 \\ \hline
1180: 25-30 & 27.34 & 4.105 & 0.640 \\ \hline
1181: 30-35 & 32.57 & 3.125 & 0.529 \\ \hline
1182: 35-40 & 37.89 & 4.348 & 0.875 \\ \hline
1183: 40-50 & 45.03 & 3.395 & 0.615 \\ \hline
1184: 50-60 & 55.09 & 2.814 & 0.727\\ \hline
1185: 60-70 & 65.14 & 3.731 & 1.342\\ \hline
1186: 70-80 & 74.79 & 5.419 & 2.566 \\ \hline
1187: 80-100 & 89.67 & 6.140 & 3.160 \\ \hline
1188: 100-120 & 109.77 & 2.995 & 2.060 \\ \hline
1189: 120-160 & 139.93 & 3.374 & 2.151 \\ \hline
1190: 160-200 & 180.14 & 1.317 & 1.539 \\
1191: \end{tabular}
1192: \end{center}
1193: \label{tab:ratio}
1194: \end{table}
1195: \clearpage
1196:
1197: \begin{figure}[h]
1198: \centerline{\psfig{figure=rpt.eps,width=15cm}}
1199: \caption{Ratio of scaled differential cross sections for $W$ to $Z$ production.
1200: The solid line is the order $\alpha_S^2$ theoretical prediction of
1201: Ref.~\protect\cite{gk} and the dotted lines are the one sigma uncertainties
1202: due to Monte Carlo integration.
1203: The error on the luminosity cancels completely on the ratio of the
1204: measured cross sections. No further error cancellation is attempted.}
1205: \label{fig:rpt}
1206: \end{figure}
1207: \clearpage
1208:
1209: \begin{figure}[h]
1210: \centerline{\psfig{figure=wpt2.eps,width=15cm}}
1211: \caption{Differential cross section for $W$ boson production as a function
1212: of $p_T^W$. The points are the D\O\ data; the error bars do not include
1213: the $4.3\%$ error in the luminosity. The histograms represent the
1214: upper and lower 68\%
1215: confidence level limits of the prediction~\protect\cite{gk}
1216: obtained from the ratio method.}
1217: \label{fig:wpt}
1218: \end{figure}
1219: \clearpage
1220: \end{document}
1221: