1: \documentclass{lf}

2: %\documentclass{ws-p8-50x6-00}

3: 

4: \newcommand{\lsim}{\raisebox{-0.5mm}{$\stackrel{<}{\scriptstyle{\sim}}$}}

5: \newcommand{\gsim}{\raisebox{-0.5mm}{$\stackrel{>}{\scriptstyle{\sim}}$}}

6: 

7: \newcommand{\qsq}{\mbox{$Q^2$}}

8: \newcommand{\fnrs}{Charg\'e de recherche FNRS}

9: 

10: \begin{document}

11: 

12: \title{Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering at H1 and ZEUS}

13: 

14: \author{Laurent Favart}

15: %\author{Laurent Favart\footnote{\fnrs}}

16: 

17: \address{ {\rm On behalf of the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations} \\

18: Universit\'e Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium\\

19: E-mail: lfavart@ulb.ac.be}

20: 

21: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

22: % You may repeat \author \address as often as necessary      %

23: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

24: 

25: \maketitle

26: 

27: \abstracts{

28: Results on Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering

29: at HERA measured by the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations are presented.

30: The cross section, measured for the first time, is reported for

31: $Q^2 > 2\,{\rm GeV}^2$, $30 < W < 120\,{\rm GeV}$ and

32: $|t| < 1\,{\rm GeV}^2$.}

33: 

34: \section{Introduction}

35: 

36: The study of exclusive final states in electron-proton diffractive

37: interactions

38: is a very powerful tool to investigate the applicability and

39: the relevance of perturbative Quantum Chromo Dynamics (QCD)

40:  in this field\cite{Abramowicz}.

41: At HERA, the wide kinematic range in the photon virtuality,

42: \qsq, provides particular insight

43: into the interplay between perturbative and non-perturbative regimes in

44: QCD.

45: Moreover, a considerable interest comes from the access diffractive

46: events give to a new class of parton distribution functions,

47: the skewed parton distributions (SPD)\cite{Diehl}

48: that can be interpreted as parton correlation functions in the proton.

49: 

50: Here we report the first results on the

51: Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering (DVCS) (Fig.~\ref{fig:diag1}a) i.e.~the

52: diffractive scattering of a virtual photon off a

53: proton:

54: \begin{equation}

55:  e^{+} + p \rightarrow e^{+} + \gamma + p .

56: \label{eq:reac}

57: \end{equation}

58: This reaction is dominated by the purely electromagnetic

59: Bethe-Heitler (BH) process (Fig.~\ref{fig:diag1}b and c) whose

60: cross section,

61: depending only on QED calculations and proton elastic form factors, is

62: precisely known and therefore can be subtracted.

63: 

64: \begin{figure}[htbp]

65:  \begin{center}

66:   \epsfig{figure=figs/dvcs_nlo4.eps,height=0.29\textwidth}

67:   \hspace*{0.2cm}

68:   \epsfig{figure=figs/compton1.eps,height=0.24\textwidth}

69:   \hspace*{0.2cm}

70:   \epsfig{figure=figs/compton2.eps,height=0.24\textwidth}

71:   \\

72:   \begin{picture}(100,0)

73:   \put(-44,-1){\bf a)}

74:   \put(64,-1){\bf b)}

75:   \put(153,-1){\bf c)}

76:   \end{picture}

77:   \caption{The DVCS (a) and the Bethe-Heitler (b and c) processes.}

78:   \label{fig:diag1}

79:  \end{center}

80:  \vspace*{-0.5cm}

81: \end{figure}

82: 

83: Compared to vector meson production, DVCS is theoretically simpler

84: because the composite meson in the final state is replaced by

85: the photon, thus avoiding large uncertainties due to the

86: unknown meson wave functions.

87: %Furthermore, 

88: %the DVCS process provides a unique way to extract SPDs 

89: %from experimental data through the measurement 

90: %of the asymmetry of the photon azimuthal angle distribution due to the

91: %interference with the Bethe--Heitler process\cite{fre}. 

92: 

93: In the presence of a hard scale, the DVCS scattering amplitude

94: factorises\cite{Radyushkin:1997ki,Collins:1999be,Ji:1998xh}

95: into a hard scattering part calculable in perturbative QCD

96: and parton distributions which contain the

97: non-perturbative effects due to the proton structure.

98: In practice, even at $Q^2$ values above a few GeV$^2$, the perturbative

99: regime is strongly influenced by non-perturbative effects which have to

100: be model based.

101: In the following, HERA measurement are compared to 

102: the LO prediction of L.\,Frankfurt, A.\,Freund and M.\,Strikman

103: (FFS)\cite{ffs}. NLO predictions have been presented for the first time

104: at this workshop\cite{Freund_nlo}. 

105: %\vspace*{-0.5cm}

106: 

107: \section{Analysis strategy}

108: 

109: Around the interaction region both experiments, H1 and ZEUS, 

110: are equipped with 

111: tracking devices which are surrounded by calorimeters.

112: Since the proton escapes the main detector through the beam pipe only 

113: the scattered electron and photon are measured. Therefore the

114: event selection is based on demanding two electromagnetic clusters,

115: one in the backward and one in the central or forward part of the 

116: detector ($\theta \lsim 140^o$ - the backward direction 

117: ($\theta=0$) is defined as the direction of the 

118: incoming electron). If a track can be reconstructed it has to be

119: associated 

120: to one of the clusters and determines the electron candidate.

121: To enhance the DVCS contribution in comparison 

122: to the Bethe--Heitler process the phase space has to be restricted

123: by demanding the photon candidate in the

124: forward part of the detector.

125: \\

126: 

127: The H1 analysis selects more specifically the elastic component by using, 

128: in addition, detectors which are placed close to the 

129: beam pipe and which are used to identify 

130: particles originating from proton dissociation processes. 

131: 

132: \section{Results}

133: 

134: \subsection{ZEUS}

135: 

136: The first observation of the DVCS process was reported by the ZEUS

137: collaboration in 1999\cite{saull}.  In the analysis a photon virtuality

138: $Q^2 > 6\,{\rm GeV}^2$ is demanded. 

139: In Fig. 2 the polar

140: angular distribution of the photon candidates is shown. 

141: A clear signal

142: above the expectations for the Bethe--Heitler process is observed.

143: The LO calculation including the DVCS and the Bethe--Heitler processes 

144: achives a good description of the experimental data.

145: A clear DVCS signal is still seen after the photon energy cut is

146: increased.

147: Also a shower shape analysis of the calorimetric clusters 

148: was performed that shows that the signal

149: originates from photons and not from

150: $\pi^0$ background.

151: \\

152: 

153: \begin{minipage}[h]{5cm}

154:  {\footnotesize Figure 2. Distribution (uncorrected) of the polar angle of the

155:    photon candidate with an energy above $2\,{\rm GeV}$.

156:    Data correspond to the full circles. The

157:    prediction for the Bethe--Heitler process is indicated by the

158:    open triangles. The prediction of Frankfurt et al. based on

159:    calculations including the Bethe--Heitler and the DVCS process

160:    is indicated by the open circles.}

161: \end{minipage}

162: 

163: \begin{minipage}[h]{6cm}

164: \setcounter{figure}{2}

165:  \begin{picture}(100,100)

166:   \put(160,50){\epsfig{figure=figs/zeusphot.eps,height=5.5cm}}

167:  \end{picture}

168:  \vspace{-2.5cm}

169: \end{minipage}

170: 

171: \subsection{H1}

172: 

173: In the H1 analysis, the DVCS cross section is measured in the

174: kinematic region:

175: $2 < Q^2 < 20\,{\rm GeV}^2 $,

176: $ |t| < 1\,{\rm GeV}^2$

177: and

178: $30 < W < 120\,{\rm GeV}$.

179: The proton

180: dissociation background has been estimated at around 10\% and subtracted 

181: statistically assuming the same $W$ and $Q^2$ dependence as for the elastic

182: component.

183: The acceptance, initial state radiation of real photons and

184: detector effects have been

185: estimated by MC to extract the elastic cross section.

186: \\

187: 

188: In Fig.~\ref{fig:h1} the differential cross sections

189: as a function of $Q^2$ and of $W$ are shown. The data

190: are compared with the Bethe--Heitler prediction alone and with

191: the full calculation including Bethe--Heitler and DVCS.

192: The description of the data by

193: the calculations is good,

194: in shape and in absolute normalization when a $t$ slope is chosen between

195: 7 and 10~GeV$^{-2}$ covering the measured

196: range for light Vector Meson production.

197: \\

198: 

199: It is important to notice that, at the LO in the leading twist

200: approximation, the interference term cancels out when

201: integrating over the azimuthal angle of the final state photon (as in the 

202: differential cross sections in $Q^2$ and of $W$).

203: 

204: \begin{figure}[htbp]

205:  %\epsfxsize120pt

206:  \begin{center}

207:   \epsfig{figure=figs/plot1.eps,height=5.0cm}

208:   \epsfig{figure=figs/plot2.eps,height=5.0cm}

209:   \caption{The measured cross sections of the reaction

210:   $e^+ p \rightarrow e^+ \gamma p$ as a function of

211:   $Q^2$ and $W$ are shown and compared to theoretical predictions.

212:   The uncertainty in the theoretical prediction, shown here as a shaded

213:   band is dominated

214:   by the unknown slope of the $t$ dependence of the DVCS part of

215:   the cross section, assuming $7 < b < 10\, {\rm GeV}^{-2}$.}

216:  \label{fig:h1}

217:  \end{center}

218:  \vspace*{-0.2cm}

219: \end{figure}

220: 

221: \section{Conclusion}

222: 

223: The DVCS process has been observed by the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations.

224: The first Cross section measurements have been presented.

225: The experimental results are well described by the LO

226: calculations of Frankfurt et al.

227: 

228: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

229: 

230: \bibitem{Abramowicz} H.~Abramowicz, these proceedings.

231: 

232: \bibitem{Diehl} M.~Diehl, these proceedings.

233: 

234: \bibitem{Radyushkin:1997ki} A.\,V.\,Radyushkin 

235:  \PRD\,{\bf 56}, 5524 (1997).

236: 

237: \bibitem{Collins:1999be} J.\,C.\,Collins, A.\,Freund,

238:  \PRD\,{\bf 59}, 074009 (1999).

239: 

240: \bibitem{Ji:1998xh} X.-D.\, Ji and J.\,Osborne,

241:  \PRD\,{\bf 58}, 094018 (1998).

242: 

243: \bibitem{ffs} L.\,L.\,Frankfurt, A.\,Freund, M.\,Strikman

244:  \PRD\,{\bf 58}, 114001 (1998) and \PRD\,{\bf 59}, 119901E (1999).

245: 

246: \bibitem{Freund_nlo} A.\,Freund, these proceedings \\

247:   A.\,Freund and M.\,F.\,McDermott [hep-ph/0106124].

248: 

249: %\bibitem{fre} A.\,Freund 

250: % \PLB\,{\bf 472}, 412 (2000).

251: 

252: \bibitem{saull} P.\,R.\,B.\,Saull, 

253: Proceedings of the Int. Europhysics Conf. on High Energy Physics,

254: Tampere, Finland, 15-21 July 1999, edited by K. Huitu, H. Kurki-Suonio 

255: and J.\,Maalampi [hep-ex/0003030].

256: 

257: \end{thebibliography}

258: 

259: %\vspace*{0.1cm}

260: \begin{flushright}

261: {\small

262: The author is supported by the Fonds National \\

263: de la Recherche

264: Scientifique of Belgium.}

265: \end{flushright}

266: \end{document} 

267: