1:
2:
3: %====================================================================%
4: % MORIOND.TEX 2-Feb-1995 %
5: % This latex file rewritten from various sources for use in the %
6: % preparation of the standard proceedings Volume, latest version %
7: % for the Neutrino'96 Helsinki conference proceedings %
8: % by Susan Hezlet with acknowledgments to Lukas Nellen. %
9: % Some changes are due to David Cassel. %
10: % %
11: % Updated to LaTeX2e and adapted to Moriond 2001 conditions %
12: % by F.Montanet 24/04/2001 %
13: %====================================================================%
14:
15: \documentclass[11pt]{article}
16: \usepackage{pennames}
17: \usepackage{moriond,epsfig}
18: %\documentstyle[11pt,moriond,epsfig]{article}
19:
20:
21: \bibliographystyle{unsrt}
22: % for BibTeX - sorted numerical labels by order of
23: % first citation.
24:
25: % A useful Journal macro
26: \def\Journal#1#2#3#4{{#1} {\bf #2}, #3 (#4)}
27:
28: % Some useful journal names
29: \def\EPJ{{\em Eur. Phys. J.} C}
30: \def\NCA{\em Nuovo Cimento}
31: \def\NIM{\em Nucl. Instrum. Methods}
32: \def\NIMA{{\em Nucl. Instrum. Methods} A}
33: \def\NPB{{\em Nucl. Phys.} B}
34: \def\PLB{{\em Phys. Lett.} B}
35: \def\PRL{\em Phys. Rev. Lett.}
36: \def\PRD{{\em Phys. Rev.} D}
37: \def\ZPC{{\em Z. Phys.} C}
38:
39: \def\PBs{\relax\ifmmode{{\rm B}^0_{\rm s}}%
40: \else${\rm B}^0_{\rm s}$\fi}%
41: \def\PaBs{\relax\ifmmode{\overline{\rm B}^0_{\rm s}}%
42: \else${\rm B}^0_{\rm s}$\fi}%
43: \def\PsD{\relax\ifmmode{{\rm D}_{\rm s}^\pm}%
44: \else${\rm D}_{\rm s}^\pm$\fi}%
45: \def\PsDst{\relax\ifmmode{{\rm D}_{\rm s}^{(\ast)\pm}}%
46: \else${\rm D}_{\rm s}^{(\ast)\pm}$\fi}%
47: \def\PsDstm{\relax\ifmmode{{\rm D}_{\rm s}^{(\ast)-}}%
48: \else${\rm D}_{\rm s}^{(\ast)-}$\fi}%
49: \def\PsDstp{\relax\ifmmode{{\rm D}_{\rm s}^{(\ast)+}}%
50: \else${\rm D}_{\rm s}^{(\ast)+}$\fi}%
51:
52: \def\mevc{MeV/$c$}
53: \def\mevcc{MeV/$c^2$}
54: \def\dmd{\ensuremath{\Delta m_\mathrm{d}}}
55: \def\dms{\ensuremath{\Delta m_\mathrm{s}}}
56:
57: % Some other macros used in the sample text
58: \def\st{\scriptstyle}
59: \def\sst{\scriptscriptstyle}
60: \def\mco{\multicolumn}
61: \def\epp{\epsilon^{\prime}}
62: \def\vep{\varepsilon}
63: \def\ra{\rightarrow}
64: \def\ppg{\pi^+\pi^-\gamma}
65: \def\vp{{\bf p}}
66: \def\ko{K^0}
67: \def\kb{\bar{K^0}}
68: \def\al{\alpha}
69: \def\ab{\bar{\alpha}}
70: \def\be{\begin{equation}}
71: \def\ee{\end{equation}}
72: \def\bea{\begin{eqnarray}}
73: \def\eea{\end{eqnarray}}
74: \def\CPbar{\hbox{{\rm CP}\hskip-1.80em{/}}}
75: %temp replacement due to no font
76: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
77: % %
78: % BEGINNING OF TEXT %
79: % %
80: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
81: \begin{document}
82: \vspace*{4cm}
83: %\title{NEW RESULTS IN THE SEARCH FOR $\PBs-\PBs$ OSCILLATIONS}
84: \title{HEAVY FLAVOURS AT LEP}
85:
86: \author{ A. SCIAB\`A }
87:
88: \address{INFN -- CNAF, via Berti-Pichat 6/2,\\
89: 40127 Bologna, Italy}
90:
91: \maketitle\abstracts{
92: This paper describes recent developments in Heavy Flavour physics at LEP,
93: focusing on a new result from the ALEPH Collaboration on
94: the search for flavour oscillations of the $\PBs$ meson. The impact of this
95: analysis on the world combination and the resulting limit on the $\PBs$
96: oscillation frequency are discussed.}
97:
98:
99: \section{Introduction}
100: Six years after the end of the LEP1 data taking, the LEP collaborations
101: continue producing impressive results in Heavy Flavours physics. Now very
102: near to its completion, the LEP Heavy Flavours research programme achieved
103: a very good precision in measuring some of the experimental quantities that
104: enter in the determination of the CKM matrix elements, like the b hadron
105: lifetimes, inclusive and exclusive b semileptonic branching ratios, or the
106: $\PBz$ oscillation frequency, reaching in some cases accuracies at the
107: percent level and significantly better than the theoretical uncertainties
108: involved in the CKM elements extraction~\cite{bphysics}.
109: Rather than reviewing these
110: results, the goal of this paper is to focus on a very recent result from the
111: ALEPH collaboration on the search for $\PBs$ oscillations, which represents
112: the most relevant development in Heavy Flavour physics from LEP during
113: the last few months.
114:
115: The $\PBs$ flavour mixing is expected to happen exactly as in the case of
116: $\PKz$ and $\PBz$ mesons, as a consequence of the flavour non-conservation
117: in charged weak-current interactions. However, a measurement of the $\PBs$
118: oscillation frequency $\dms$ is still lacking, because it is too high to be
119: resolved with the present experimental resolutions and statistics.
120:
121: The interest in this measurement lies in the possibility to constrain much
122: more tightly the value of $V_{\mathrm{td}}$; in fact, using the
123: $\PBz$ oscillation frequency $\dmd$ alone, the accuracy in the
124: $V_{\mathrm{td}}$ determination is about 15\%, due the
125: uncertainty on the non-perturbative QCD calculations involved, while in
126: the $\dmd/\dms$ ratio this uncertainty largely
127: cancels~\cite{theor}.
128:
129: If the width difference between the two $\PBs$ mass eigenstates and CP
130: violation effects are neglected, the probability for a $\PBs$ meson
131: produced at $t=0$ in a definite flavour eigenstate to decay at a time $t$
132: in the opposite (or same) flavour eigenstate can be simply expressed as:
133: \begin{equation}
134: P(t)_{\PBs\rightarrow\PaBs(\PBs)}=\frac{1}{2\tau_s}
135: e^{-\frac{t}{\tau_s}}\left[1\mp A\cos(\dms t)\right],
136: \label{eq:prob}
137: \end{equation}
138: where $\tau_s$ is the average $\PBs$ lifetime, and $A\equiv1$.
139:
140: In principle, using Eq.~\ref{eq:prob}, it is possible to measure
141: $\dms$ provided that,
142: for every selected $\PBs$ meson, one can measure $a)$ the flavour state
143: at production time, $b)$ the flavour state at decay time, and $c)$ the
144: proper decay time. If the experimental sensitivity is not enough to
145: perform such a measurement, the so-called
146: ``amplitude method'', consisting in fitting the
147: amplitude $A$ of the oscillating term in Eq.~\ref{eq:prob} for a fixed value
148: of the frequency,
149: is commonly used to show the agreement of the data with
150: a certain hypothesis for the value of $\dms$~\cite{amplitude,duccio}; to do
151: this, the fitted value of $A$ is plotted as a function of the
152: oscillation frequency being tested, $\omega$.
153: It is expected for $A$ to be consistent with one at the true value of
154: $\dms$ and with zero at far lower frequencies.
155:
156: The lower limit on $\dms$ at 95\% C.L. is
157: defined as the smallest value of $\dms$ for which an amplitude $A=1$
158: is not excluded at 95\% C.L., while the sensitivity of a measurement is
159: conventionally defined as the expected 95\% C.L. lower
160: limit on $\dms$ if the true value of $\dms$ were infinite.
161:
162: \section{New experimental results}
163: In this section, the most recent experimental results on the
164: search for $\PBs$ oscillations from the ALEPH collaboration will
165: be described~\cite{newbs}.
166:
167: Three different event selections have been applied to approximately four
168: million hadronic Z decays,
169: collected by the ALEPH detector~\cite{aleph,perf} from 1991 to 1995, and,
170: for the first analysis alone, to about 400000 hadronic Z decays taken at the
171: Z peak for calibration purposes from 1996 to 2000. The first selection
172: reconstructs exclusively some $\PBs$ hadronic decays; the second selection
173: reconstructs semileptonic $\PBs$ decays in a semi-exclusive manner, while
174: the third is an inclusive selection of semileptonic $\PBs$ decays.
175:
176: \begin{figure}
177: \begin{center}
178: \epsfig{file=ep-2002-016_Figure4.eps,height=8.9cm}
179: \epsfig{file=ep-2002-016_Figure7.eps,height=7.0cm}
180: \caption{(left) Mass spectra for the $\PBs$ candidates in the fully exclusive
181: analysis in data (dots) and Monte Carlo (histograms): a) $\PsDm\pi^+
182: (\pi^0,\gamma)$ channel, b) $\PsDm\mathrm{a}_1^+(\gamma)$,
183: c) the sum of both.
184: (right) Amplitude fit for the fully exclusive analysis.}
185: \label{fig:bsmass}
186: \end{center}
187: \end{figure}
188:
189: \subsection{Flavour Tagging}
190: The three analyses use a similar algorithm for the determination of the
191: flavour at production. In the event hemisphere opposite to the one
192: containing the $\PBs$ candidate, a neural network is used to discriminate
193: tracks coming from the primary and the secondary vertex and to compute
194: jet charges and primary and secondary vertex charges, which are combined with
195: the charge of lepton or kaon candidates (if present) in a single estimator.
196:
197: In addition, information from the hemisphere containing the $\PBs$ candidate is
198: also used, in particular by calculating charge estimators with the
199: fragmentation
200: tracks and looking at fragmentation kaon candidates. Finally, the
201: correlation between
202: the flavour and the angle of the $\PBs$ with respect to the initial electron
203: direction, due to the b forward-backward asymmetry, is exploited.
204:
205: The average probability for signal events to tag incorrectly the initial
206: state flavour is found to be about 24\% for the three analyses.
207:
208: The flavour state at decay is determined from the sign of the charge of the
209: $\PBs$ decay products. In the analyses using semileptonic decays, the
210: opposite correlation between the lepton charge and the $\PBs$ flavour
211: in $\mathrm{b}\rightarrow\mathrm{c}\rightarrow\ell$ cascade decays with
212: respect to the signal is taken into account.
213:
214: \begin{figure}
215: \begin{center}
216: \epsfig{file=ep-2002-016_Figure9.eps,height=8.5cm}
217: \caption{Mass distribution of candidates with $\PsDm\ell^+$ combinations
218: for a) hadronic and b) semileptonic $\PsDm$ decays on data (dots)
219: and Monte Carlo (histograms). The spectra for the wrong sign
220: combinations are also shown.}
221: \label{fig:dsm}
222: \end{center}
223: \end{figure}
224:
225: \subsection{Analysis of Fully Reconstructed Hadronic Decays}
226: This analysis is performed on a selected sample of $\PBs\rightarrow
227: \PsDstm\pi^+$, $\PBs\rightarrow\PsDstm\mathrm{a}_1^+$, and
228: $\PBs\rightarrow\PsDstm\rho^+$ decays, where
229: $\mathrm{D}^{\ast-}\rightarrow\PsDm\gamma$ and the $\PsDm$ meson
230: decays into $\Phi\pi^-$, $\PKstz\PKm$, or
231: $\PKzS\PKm$. The resolution of the reconstructed $\PBs$ mass is about 20
232: \mevcc, and the selection efficiency ranges from 5\% to 20\%, depending on the
233: decay channel.
234:
235: The signal-to-background discrimination is largely improved by the
236: reconstruction of the photons and neutral pions emitted in the decays with
237: a $\mathrm{D}^{\ast-}$ or a $\rho^+$; otherwise, such decays would
238: be reconstructed with
239: a significantly lower mass and a much poorer mass resolution.
240:
241: The selected candidates are 80, and their mass spectrum is shown in Figure
242: \ref{fig:bsmass}. The composition of the sample in terms of signal
243: $\PBs$ events, events with other b hadrons and lighter quark events, is
244: estimated on an event-by-event basis as a function of the helicity angle or
245: the invariant mass of the $\PsDm$ candidate with a standard discrimination
246: variable technique. The estimated signal purity is in average about 36\% but
247: can reach 80\% for some events.
248:
249: The main interest of this analysis resides in the very precise measurement
250: of the decay proper time, due mainly to the fact that all the decay particles
251: are measured and therefore the $\PBs$ momentum is accurately known, at the
252: percent level. The error on the measured decay length is around 180 $\mu$m,
253: and the error on the proper time is about 0.08 ps. This results
254: in a relatively slower degradation of the amplitude error at increasing test
255: frequencies, and allows this analysis to give a significant contribution to
256: the combined amplitude spectrum at high frequencies, despite its very low
257: sensitivity (Figure \ref{fig:bsmass}).
258:
259: \subsection{Analysis of $\PsDm\ell^+$ Pairs}
260: The second analysis discussed here relies on
261: the reconstruction of $\PBs\rightarrow\PsDstm\ell^+\nu_\ell$
262: decays, with the $\PsDm$ meson decaying in one of the following hadronic
263: and semileptonic decay modes:
264: \begin{eqnarray}
265: \begin{array}{ll}
266: \nonumber
267: \PsDm\to\phi\,\pi^- \,,&
268: \PsDm\to\PKstz\,\PKm \,,\\
269: \PsDm\to\PKzS\,\PKm \,, &
270: \PsDm\to\phi\,\rho^-\,, \\
271: \PsDm\to\PKstz\,\PKst^-\,,&
272: \PsDm\to\phi\,\pi^+\,\pi^-\,\pi^-\,,\\
273: \PsDm\to\phi\,\Pem\,\bar{\nu}_{\mathrm{e}} \,,&
274: \PsDm\to\phi\,\mu^-\,\bar{\nu}_{\mu}~.
275: \end{array}
276: \end{eqnarray}
277:
278: Compared with a similar analysis previously
279: published~\cite{oldbs}, it takes advantage from an improved $dE/dx$
280: estimation and tracking performance, a general reoptimization of the
281: selection cuts and a better background discrimination.
282:
283: As the neutrino from the $\PBs$ decay (and the one from the $\PsDm$ decay,
284: if any) is undetected, its energy is estimated from the missing energy in the
285: hemisphere~\cite{eneu}. This results in an average relative uncertainty on the
286: $\PBs$ momentum of about 11\%. The decay length uncertainty
287: is about 240 $\mu$m and it is
288: worse than for the fully exclusive analysis due to the smaller angle
289: among the decay particles in the laboratory system.
290:
291: The candidates selected are 333; a major source of background to the event
292: selection comes from
293: $\mathrm{b}\rightarrow\PsDm\PD\mathrm{X}\ (\mathrm{D}\rightarrow
294: \ell^+)$ decays, which can be discriminated from the signal by the differences
295: in shape of the distributions of the lepton momentum,
296: the $\PsDm\ell^+$ invariant mass, the estimated $\PBs$ momentum and the number
297: of charged particles forming a good vertex with the lepton. The fraction
298: of combinatorial background is estimated from a fit to the
299: $\PsD$ ($\phi$) mass spectra for the hadronic (semileptonic) decays, shown
300: in Figure \ref{fig:dsm}. The signal purity depends strongly on the decay
301: mode, and is 47\% in average.
302:
303: The result of the fit to the amplitude of the oscillation term is shown
304: in Figure \ref{fig:ampl_aleph}.
305:
306: \begin{figure}
307: \begin{center}
308: \epsfig{file=ep-2002-016_Figure11.eps,height=7.9cm}
309: \epsfig{file=ep-2002-016_Figure16.eps,height=7.9cm}
310: \caption{Amplitude fit as a function of the frequency for the
311: $\PsDm\ell^+$ analysis (left) and for the inclusive semileptonic
312: analysis (right).}
313: \label{fig:ampl_aleph}
314: \end{center}
315: \end{figure}
316:
317: \subsection{Inclusive Semileptonic Analysis}
318: This analysis is based on
319: a sample of inclusively selected $\PBs$ semileptonic decays, and supersedes
320: a similar analysis~\cite{oldincl}. Event hemispheres
321: with a lepton having a large transverse momentum relative to the nearest jet
322: are selected, and the charmed particle from the b-hadron decay is reconstructed
323: by means of a topological algorithm. The inclusion
324: in the secondary vertex fit of a ``B track'' together with the lepton and the
325: charmed particle, and the reconstruction of photons from the decay of the
326: charmed particle, allow to improve the $\PBs$ decay length measurement
327: precision up to 22\%.
328:
329: In average, the decay length resolution is about 370 $\mu$m; however,
330: the statistical significance of the data sample is greatly enhanced by
331: parameterizing the decay length resolution as a function of several
332: quantities, mostly related to the topology of the decay and the quality
333: of the vertex reconstruction.
334: The $\PBs$ momentum is estimated using the lepton energy, the neutrino
335: energy, and the energy of a jet clustered around the charged
336: particles coming from
337: the D vertex. The momentum resolution is parameterized event-by-event, and
338: is about 12\% in average.
339:
340: The fraction of $\mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}}$ events in the selected
341: sample is enlarged by the use of a b-tagging
342: algorithm, and a neural network is used to discriminate direct $\mathrm{b}
343: \rightarrow\ell$ decays with respect to cascade decays ($\mathrm{b}
344: \rightarrow\mathrm{c}\rightarrow\ell$), exploiting the differences
345: between them in terms of lepton kinematics and vertex topology. Finally,
346: the abundance of $\PBs$ decays compared to other b hadron species is estimated
347: as a function of the total charge and the charged multiplicity of the tertiary
348: vertex, and of the presence of kaons coming from the fragmentation and the
349: decay of the charmed particle. After the selection, 74026 candidates remain, of
350: which 87\% contain $\mathrm{b}\rightarrow\ell$ decays, and 10\% are
351: $\PBs$ decays.
352:
353: The results of the amplitude fit performed on this sample are visible in
354: Figure \ref{fig:ampl_aleph}.
355: It is worth to stress that, compared with the previous version of this
356: analysis, the event statistics is more that two times larger, and the
357: description of the proper time resolution and the signal purity is much
358: more detailed, resulting in an increase in the sensitivity from 9.6 ps$^{-1}$
359: to 14.3 ps$^{-1}$.
360:
361:
362: \subsection{Combined Result}
363: The amplitude spectra for all three analyses have been combined and the result
364: is shown in Figure \ref{fig:worldfit}. It can be seen that a 95\% C.L.
365: lower limit of 10.9 ps$^{-1}$ can be put on the $\PBs$ oscillation
366: frequency, compared to a sensitivity of 15.7 ps$^{-1}$. This is,
367: presently, the highest sensitivity reached by a single experiment.
368:
369: \begin{figure}[t]
370: \begin{center}
371: \epsfig{file=ep-2002-016_Figure21.eps,height=7.9cm}
372: \epsfig{file=dms_W.eps,height=7.9cm}
373: \caption{(left) ALEPH combined amplitude fit. (right) Amplitude fit
374: for the world combination.}
375: \label{fig:worldfit}
376: \end{center}
377: \end{figure}
378:
379: \section{Present Status of the $\dms$ Measurements}
380: The new ALEPH results have been combined with all the available results
381: from other experiments (some of which still preliminary)~\cite{comb},
382: and the amplitude
383: spectrum for the combination is shown in Figure~\ref{fig:worldfit}.
384: The 95\% C.L. lower limit on $\dms$ is 14.9 ps$^{-1}$, and the
385: sensitivity reaches 19.3 ps$^{-1}$. These numbers are within the range allowed
386: by a global fit on the unitarity triangle parameters~\cite{triangle}, which
387: gives $\dms=17.8^{+3.2}_{-2.8}$ ps$^{-1}$.
388:
389: It is clear that the final sensitivity to be reached by all the analyses
390: from the LEP collaborations and SLD combined together, cannot be far from
391: its present value. On the other hand, the Tevatron Run II data is expected
392: to allow CDF and D0 to reach, by the 2002 summer, a sensitivity of several
393: tens of ps$^{-1}$, well beyond the value given by the
394: indirect measurement quoted above.
395:
396: \section*{References}
397: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
398:
399: \bibitem{bphysics} D. Abbaneo {\it et al},
400: hep-ex/0112021.
401:
402: \bibitem{theor}
403: M. Ciuchini {\it et al}, \emph{JHEP} {\bf 07}, 013 (2001).
404:
405: \bibitem{amplitude}H.-G. Moser and A. Roussarie,
406: \Journal{\NIMA}{384}{491}{1997}.
407:
408: \bibitem{duccio}D. Abbaneo and G. Boix, \emph{JHEP} {\bf 08}, 004 (1999).
409:
410: \bibitem{newbs}A. Heister {\it et al}, CERN-EP-2002-016, submitted to Eur. Phys. J. C.
411:
412: \bibitem{aleph}D. D\'ecamp {\it et al}, \Journal{\NIMA}{294}{121}{1990}.
413:
414: \bibitem{perf}D. Buskulic {\it et al}, \Journal{\NIMA}{360}{481}{1995}.
415:
416: \bibitem{oldbs}D. Buskulic {\it et al}, \Journal{\PLB}{377}{205}{1996}.
417:
418: \bibitem{eneu}A. Heister {\it et al}, \Journal{\PLB}{512}{30}{2001}.
419:
420: \bibitem{oldincl}R. Barate {\it et al}, \Journal{\EPJ}{7}{553}{1999}.
421:
422: \bibitem{comb}http://lepbosc.web.cern.ch/LEPBOSC/.
423:
424: \bibitem{triangle}F. Parodi {\it et al}, http://ckm-workshop.web.cern.ch/ckm-workshop/.
425:
426: \end{thebibliography}
427:
428: \end{document}
429:
430: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
431: % End of moriond.tex %
432: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
433: