1: \documentstyle[fleqn,espcrc2,epsfig]{article}

2: \title{$\Omega^-$ Hyperon Decay Modes with the

3: HyperCP Experiment at Fermilab.}

4: \author{Prof. Nickolas Solomey

5: \address{Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, USA}}

6: 

7: \begin{document}

8: 

9: \begin{abstract}

10: The HyperCP experiment (Fermilab E871) has the largest recorded sample of

11: $\Omega^-$ hyperon decays, allowing new searches for three rare decay

12: modes, each with five charged tracks in the final state. Results are

13: presented for $\Omega^-\to\Xi^-\pi^+\pi^-$; $\Omega^- \to

14: \Xi^0(1530)\pi^-$; and the flavor-changing neutral-current decay $\Omega^-

15: \to \Xi^-\mu^+\mu^-$. Normalization of these measurements were to the

16: decay $\Omega^- \to \Lambda K^-$ with a five-track topology similar to the

17: signal mode with the subsequent decay of $\Lambda \to p \pi^-$ and $K^-

18: \to \pi^- \pi^+ \pi^-$ in the decay volume.

19: \end{abstract}

20: 

21: \maketitle

22: 

23: \section{Theoretical Background}

24: The $\Omega^-$ hyperon with three strange quarks is of great theoretical

25: interest because of its unique ability to tell us about the processes

26: involved in the decay \cite{eilam}. However to be able to actually use

27: this wonderful tool provided by nature it is first necessary to obtain a

28: large sample of interesting decays. The HyperCP experiment has made great

29: progress in this pursuit with a recent observation of a rare decay mode.

30: 

31: The decays of interest and their theoretical expected \cite{singer} or

32: previously reported Branching Ratios (BR) are:

33: \begin{eqnarray}

34: \Omega^- & \rightarrow & \Xi^- \gamma \hspace{1.2cm} 1.6\times10^{-4} \\

35:     & \rightarrow & \Xi^- \pi^+ \pi^- \hspace{.5cm} 4.3\times10^{-4}

36: \hspace{0.3cm}

37: {\rm \cite{wa2}} \\

38:     & \rightarrow & \Xi^- e^+ e^- \hspace{.6cm} 1.4\times10^{-6}  \\

39:     & \rightarrow & \Xi^- \mu^+ \mu^- \hspace{.55cm} 6.6\times10^{-8}

40: \end{eqnarray}

41: (The equivalent anti-particle processes are also of interest.) 

42: All of these

43: decay modes have a high-$Q$ released energy and should not be limited by

44: phase space. The radiative decay mode listed first has yet to be seen, but

45: it has a high theoretical BR. The second decay mode has many

46: possible suppressed feynman diagrams that can contribute (such as tree,

47: penguin, and double-Zweig) and perhaps others due to new particles

48: including higgs or supersymmetry, but experimentally it has a substantial

49: BR. The last two decays are flavor-changing neutral currents,

50: which have never been seen with hyperon decays.

51: 

52: Observation of these decays, especially with high statistics, can be a

53: useful tool for both probing the accuracy of the standard model, and as a

54: means to look for new physics. A large decay sample can be useful for more

55: than just the BR measurement. The subsequent decay of the

56: $\Xi^-$ can tell us about the decay itself by using its analyzing power to

57: look for an asymmetry in the decay \cite{hara}, similar to that done with

58: other hyperon radiative decays \cite{ktevrad}.

59: 

60: There are also two other processes that can contribute to the decay in

61: equation (2). These are when the final observed five tracks have gone

62: through a short lived resonance:

63: \begin{eqnarray*}

64: \Omega^- & \rightarrow & \Xi^0(1530) \hspace{0.15cm}   \pi^-

65: \hspace{3.5cm} (5)\\

66: & &   \hspace{0.24cm}  \rightarrow  \Xi^-  \pi^+  \\

67:     &  \rightarrow & \Xi^- \sigma^0(400)  \hspace{3.85cm}  (6) \\

68: & &  \hspace{0.65cm} \rightarrow \pi^+ \pi^-

69: \end{eqnarray*}

70: Observation of the $\sigma^0(400)$ would be important since the existence

71: of this state is highly debated and has never been observed in any decay

72: chain. Its mass value is stated in the PDG as being from 400 to 1200

73: Mev/c$^2$ and its Breit-Wigner width is anywhere from 600 to 1000

74: MeV/c$^2$! All of these parameters could be resolved if this particle is

75: studied in a decay.

76: 

77: \section{New Results in $\Omega^-$ Decays}

78: The HyperCP experiment E871 at Fermilab took data in 1997 and 1999

79: \cite{e871}. The experiment is depicted in figure \ref{e871}. It was

80: designed to search for CP violation in Hyperons \cite{pi}. The 800

81: GeV/c proton beam hit a target at the entrance of a hyperon channel with a

82: nominal momentum of 170 GeV/$c$ and a bite of $\pm 35$ GeV/$c$ FWHM. The

83: experiment's decay volume started at the exit of the hyperon channel and

84: was 13 meters long. The experiment itself is a charged particle tracking

85: spectrometer, with 4 MWPC before a high-field analysis magnet and 4 MWPC

86: after the analysis magnet. These were followed by a hodoscope of 10-cm

87: wide vertical paddles in the positive and negative arms of the

88: spectrometer. There was a muon identification system further downstream

89: that consisted of a muon hodoscope and three layers of steel and

90: proportional tubes.

91: \begin{figure}

92: \begin{center}

93: \mbox{

94: \epsfig{file=e871.eps,%

95: height=0.725\linewidth}

96: }

97: \end{center}

98: \caption{A schematic depiction of the E871 HyperCP experiment at

99: Fermilab.} \label{e871}

100: \end{figure}

101: 

102: The trigger of the experiment consisted of at least two charged tracks of

103: opposite polarity and energy in the calorimeter, which was a combination

104: electromagnetic and hadronic calorimeter. The experiment wrote more than

105: 40,000 5Gb Exabyte data tapes. These raw data tapes were processed to

106: produce different output data streams which had further requirements such

107: as three charged tracks, good masses, and identified muons depending upon

108: the intended physics use of each stream. Anti-particle processes (referred

109: to as ``positive'' data) were studied in the same spectrometer under

110: identical conditions (except for their production momentum spectra and

111: daughter-particle interaction cross sections) by reversing the magnetic

112: field in the hyperon channel and analysis magnets.

113: 

114: The results presented here come from an analysis of the stream with at

115: least three charged tracks for the decay mode $\Omega^- \rightarrow \Xi^-

116: \pi^+ \pi^-$ and at least three charged tracks plus two opposite polarity

117: muon tracks for the decay mode $\Omega^- \rightarrow \Xi^- \mu^+ \mu^-$.

118: The selection cuts were devised with a blind analysis on signal,

119: normalizing and background modes generated with a dedicated Monte-Carlo

120: simulation program. The cuts used in this analysis were: (a) three

121: negative and two positive tracks, (b) all decay vertices inside the decay

122: volume, (c) vertex topology consistent with the intended decay, (d) total

123: $\Omega^-$ momentum between 120 and 220 GeV/$c$, (e) all reconstructed

124: masses within $\pm 3 $ sigma of their nominal mass, and (f) the

125: reconstructed $\Omega^-$ track appeared to come from the aperture of the

126: hyperon channel exit. For the muon decay mode of equation (4) an

127: additional requirement from the muon identification system was imposed.

128: For the $\overline{\Omega}$, the number of different charged particles

129: required was inverted.

130: 

131: Normalization of the candidate events could be done with both the five-

132: and three-track decays $\Omega^- \rightarrow \Lambda K^-$ where the $K^-$

133: either does or does not decay into three charged pions. In either case the

134: $\Lambda$ decays into proton and $\pi^-$. The five-track decay mode is the

135: most valuable decay for normalization since the topology is very similar

136: to the signal modes and is the one used in all BR calculations presented

137: here. The Monte-Carlo was used for acceptance corrections among the

138: various modes. For the signal mode of equation (2) a uniformly populated

139: phase

140: space generator was used. The Monte-Carlo was also used to simulate

141: possible

142: backgrounds before opening the signal box. At that stage of the analysis

143: there was confidence that no significant backgrounds 

144: to these decay modes existed.

145: 

146: \section{Observations and Measurements}

147: The full HyperCP data sample was analyzed \cite{solomey}. The observed

148: ``negative'' five-track signal of the decay $\Omega^- \rightarrow \Xi^-

149: \pi^+ \pi^-$ is shown in figure \ref{data}, and the normalization was done

150: with the five-track decay mode $\Omega^- \rightarrow \Lambda K^-$ where

151: $K^- \rightarrow \pi^- \pi^+ \pi^-$ and $\Lambda \rightarrow p \pi^-$

152: shown in figure \ref{data2}.

153: {\begin{figure}[t]

154: \begin{center}

155: \mbox{

156: \epsfig{file=mxipipi.eps,%

157: height=0.98\linewidth}

158: }

159: \end{center}

160: \caption{The observed events for the five-track signal mode of equation

161: (2) is shown with all of the negative hyperon beam data.}

162: \label{data}

163: \end{figure}

164: \begin{figure}[t]

165: \begin{center}

166: \mbox{

167: \epsfig{file=mlamk.eps,%

168: height=0.98\linewidth}

169: }

170: \end{center}

171: \caption{The observed events for the five-track normalizing mode $\Omega^-

172: \rightarrow \Lambda K^-$ where the $K^-$ decays into three charged pions

173: and the $\Lambda$ into $p \pi^-$ in the experiment's decay volume before

174: the first MWPC, for all of the negative hyperon beam data.}

175: \label{data2}

176: \end{figure}

177: } When combined with the acceptance correction from Monte-Carle simulation

178: and the appropriate known BR from the PDG \cite{pdg} it permitted

179: measuring

180: \begin{eqnarray*}

181: BR(\Omega^{-} \to \Xi^{-} \pi^{+} \pi^{-}) & = & \hspace{2.85cm} (7)\\

182: & & \hspace{-3.2cm} \frac{N_{\Omega^{-} \to \Xi^{-} \pi^{+} \pi^{-}}}

183: {N_{\Omega^- \to \Lambda K3pi^-}}

184: \frac{A_{\Omega^- \to \Lambda K3pi^-}}

185: {A_{\Omega^{-} \to \Xi^{-} \pi^{+} \pi^{-}}} \times \\

186: & & \hspace{-3.2cm} \frac{BR(\Omega^- \to \Lambda K^-)\times BR(K^- \to

187: \pi^- \pi^+ \pi^-)} {BR(\Xi^- \to \Lambda \pi^-)}.

188: \end{eqnarray*}

189: All data sets and their combinations yields statistically consistent

190: results as shown in figure \ref{br}. The signal events within $\pm3

191: $ sigma were used, and the background under the signal peak was estimated

192: using the side bands at $\pm 7{\rm -}11 $ sigma.

193: \begin{figure}[t]

194: \begin{center}

195: \mbox{

196: \epsfig{file=o5.eps,%

197: height=0.98\linewidth}

198: }

199: \end{center}

200: \caption{Preliminary BR for the $\Omega^- \rightarrow \Xi^-

201: \pi^+ \pi^-$ for all four data samples and various combinations. Errors

202: are statistical only.}

203: \label{br}

204: \end{figure}

205: 

206: \section{Conclusion}

207: The final combined preliminary BR for this decay mode is $3.6

208: \times 10^{-4}$ with a statistical error of $\pm 0.3 \times 10^{-4}$,

209: which is slightly

210: better than a 10\% measurement. The HyperCP data sample was also used to

211: measure the $\overline{\Omega}$ hyperon (referred to in the graph as

212: ``Pos\@.'' data), and this yields a very similar result within errors. The

213: full data sample was also used to look for the flavor-changing

214: neutral-current decay modes with muon pairs. No candidate events were

215: observed yielding a preliminary BR limit with only the

216: negative data as $< 1 \times 10^{-4}$ at the 90\% confidence level.

217: 

218: A first look at the resonance mode of equation (5) shows no clear sign of

219: its existence (see figure \ref{data3}), but the $\Xi^0(1530)$ is a wide

220: resonance and spin has not yet been taken into account in the Monte-Carlo

221: simulation of this decay so the exact expectations of its signature may be

222: not be an obvious peak.

223: \begin{figure}[t]

224: \begin{center}

225: \mbox{

226: \epsfig{file=mxipi.eps,%

227: height=0.98\linewidth}

228: }

229: \end{center}

230: \caption{Using only those $\Omega^-$ within

231: $\pm 3 $ sigma of its known mass, the $\Xi^0$(1530) resonance

232: is not immediately evident.}

233: \label{data3}

234: \end{figure}

235: 

236: Further work is needed to refine these results and their associated

237: systematic errors which are not worse than these statistical

238: errors. There are also plans to use this data to understand what, if

239: anything, resonance decays could be contributing. Furthermore, by using

240: the self-analyzing power of the $\Xi^-$ decays it should be possible to

241: look for any asymmetries of the $\pi^+ \pi^-$ pair, similar to the

242: asymmetry seen in hyperon radiative decays, to yield clues to the decay

243: mechanism.

244: 

245: \section*{Acknowledgments}

246: The data used in this analysis is the direct result of a lot

247: of hard work by members of the HyperCP experiment, and by the Fermilab and

248: University technical staffs. This work was partly done in conjunction with

249: Nathan Stobie, a senior thesis student at the Illinois Institute of

250: Technology. I am also greatly indebted to Jon Rosner and Paul Singer for

251: many useful discussions.

252: 

253: \begin{thebibliography}{9}

254: \bibitem{eilam}G. Eilam {\em et al.}, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 53} (1996) 3629.

255: \bibitem{singer}R. Safadi and P. Singer, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 37}

256: (1988) 697.

257: \bibitem{wa2}M. Bourquin {\em et al.}, N.\ Phys.\ {\bf B241} (1984) 1.

258: \bibitem{hara}Y. Hara, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf12} (1964) 378.

259: \bibitem{ktevrad}A. Alavi-Harati {\em et al.}, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf86}

260: (2001) 3239.

261: \bibitem{e871}C. Dukes {\em et al.}, Fermilab Proposal 871, 1995.

262: \bibitem{pi}P. Zyla, these proceedings.

263: \bibitem{solomey}N. Solomey and N. Stobie, Observation of Rare $\Omega$

264: decays

265: with the HyperCP Data, E871 internal report, Oct 2001.

266: \bibitem{pdg}Particle Data Group, C. Caso {\em et al.}, Eur. Phys. J.\

267: {\bf C3} (1998) 1.

268: \end{thebibliography}

269: 

270: \end{document}

271: 

272: