1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2: %\usepackage{fleqn, espcrc1,pstricks}
3: \usepackage[dvips]{color}
4: \usepackage{mathtext}
5: %\usepackage[T2A]{fontenc}
6: \usepackage[koi8-r]{inputenc}
7: %\usepackage[russian]{babel}
8: %\usepackage{latexsym}
9: %\pagestyle{empty}
10: \oddsidemargin 5mm
11: \evensidemargin 0mm
12: \topmargin -20mm
13: \textwidth 160mm
14: \textheight 220mm
15: %\pagestyle{plain}
16: %\pagenumbering{arabic}
17: % change this to the following line for use with LaTeX2.09
18: %\documentstyle[12pt,twoside,fleqn,espcrc1]{article}
19: %\documentstyle[12pt]{article}
20: % if you want to include PostScript figures
21: \usepackage{graphicx}
22: % if you have landscape tables
23: \usepackage[figuresright]{rotating}
24: %\usepackage{amstext}
25: %\usepackage{amsmath}
26: \usepackage{amssymb,eucal}
27: \usepackage{cite}
28: \date{}
29:
30: % put your own definitions here:
31: % \newcommand{\cZ}{\cal{Z}}
32: % \newtheorem{def}{Definition}[section]
33: % ...
34: %\newcommand{\ttbs}{\char'134}
35: %\newcommand{\AmS}{{\protect\the\textfont2
36: % A\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox{M}\kern-.125emS}}
37: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}
38: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
39: \newcommand{\beqn}{\begin{eqnarray}}
40: \newcommand{\eeqn}{\end{eqnarray}}
41: %\definecolor{darkmagenta}{rgb}{1,0,.5}
42: % add words to TeX's hyphenation exception list
43: %\hyphenation{author another created financial paper re-commend-ed
44: %Post-Script}
45:
46: % declarations for front matter
47: %\pagecolor{yellow}
48: %\definecolor{braun}{rgb}{1,.5,0}
49: %\definecolor{sky}{rgb}{0,.8,1}
50: %\definecolor{lightblue}{rgb}{0,1,1}
51: %\definecolor{magenta}{rgb}{1,0,1}
52: %\definecolor{fiolet}{rgb}{0.6,0,0,7}
53: %\definecolor{Gyellow}{rgb}{0.2,1,0.2}
54: %\definecolor{grey}{.75}
55: %\includeonly{title,introduction,theory/theory,
56: %exp_review/exp_review,detector/detector}
57: %\includeonly{detector}
58:
59:
60:
61: \begin{document}
62: \title{Further search for T-violation in the decay $K^+\to \pi^0\mu^+\nu$ }
63:
64: \author{M. Abe$^a$,
65: M. Aliev$^b$, V. Anisimovsky$^b$, M. Aoki$^c$, Y. Asano$^a$, \\
66: T. Baker$^d$, M. Blecher$^e$, P.~Depommier$^f$, M. Hasinoff$^g$, \\
67: K. Horie$^h$, Y. Igarashi$^h$, J. Imazato$^h$, A. Ivashkin$^b$, \\
68: M.~Khabibullin$^b$, A. Khotjantsev$^b$, Yu. Kudenko$^b$, Y. Kuno$^c$, \\
69: K.S. Lee$^i$, A. Levchenko$^b$, G.Y. Lim$^h$, J. Macdonald$^j$, \\
70: O. Mineev$^b$, N.~Okorokova$^b$, C.~Rangacharyulu $^d$, S.~Shimizu$^c$, \\
71: Y.-M.~Shin$^d$, N.~Yershov$^b$, and T. Yokoi$^h$ \\
72: ~\\
73: ({\it Presented by Yu.~Kudenko for the KEK E246 Collaboration})
74: ~\\
75: ~\\
76: $^a$University of Tsukuba, 305-0006, Japan \\
77: $^b$Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, 117312 Moscow, Russia \\
78: $^c$Osaka University, 560-0043, Japan \\
79: $^d$University of Saskatchewan, S7N 0W0, Canada \\
80: $^e$Virginia Polytechnic Institute \& State University, USA \\
81: $^f$University of Montreal, H3C 3J7, Canada \\
82: $^g$University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1Z1, Canada \\
83: $^h$KEK, 305-0801, Japan \\
84: $^i$Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea \\
85: $^j$TRIUMF, V6T 2A3, Canada \\
86: }
87: % typeset front matter
88:
89: \maketitle
90:
91: \begin{abstract}
92: A new result for the transverse $\mu^+$ polarization, $P_T$,
93: in the decay $K^+\to \pi^0\mu^+\nu$ has been obtained in the KEK E246 experiment.
94: Combined with our earlier result,
95: $P_T = (-1.12\pm 2.17(stat)\pm 0.90(syst))\times 10^{-3}$ and
96: Im$(\xi)= (-0.28\pm 0.69(stat) \pm 0.30(syst))\times 10^{-2}$, which are
97: consistent with no T-violation.
98: \end{abstract}
99:
100: \section{Introduction}
101: The transverse muon polarization, $P_{T}$,
102: in the decay $K^{+}\rightarrow\pi^{0}\mu^{+}\nu$~($K_{\mu3}$)
103: provides a
104: good opportunity to search for
105: CP-violation beyond the Standard Model~(SM), and it can provide insight into the
106: origin of CP-violation. This polarization
107: vanishes in the SM~\cite{bigi},
108: but it can be as large as $10^{-2}-10^{-3}$ in models with multi-Higgs doublets,
109: leptoquarks, left--right symmetry or SUSY~\cite{geng}. Since the
110: contribution to $P_{T}$ from final
111: state interactions was found to be $ < 10^{-5}$~\cite{fsi}, a larger
112: value of $P_T$ would be
113: a clear indication of physics beyond the SM by inferring a non-zero
114: Im$(\xi)$, where
115: $\xi(q^2) = f_{-}(q^2)/f_{+}(q^2)$ is the ratio of two form factors,
116: $f_{\pm}(q^2)$ in the $K_{\mu3}$ decay matrix element~\cite{cabibbo}.
117: The previous result,
118: $P_T = (-4.2\pm 4.9(stat)\pm 0.9(syst))\times 10^{-3}$
119: and
120: Im$(\xi)= (-1.3\pm 1.6(stat) \pm 0.3(syst))\times 10^{-2}$ was obtained
121: in~\cite{prl99} for the 1996-97 data set.
122: In this paper we present a new result
123: of one of the analyses of the data collected in 1998-2000 combined with our
124: previous published result.
125: \section{Experiment}
126: The E246 experiment was carried out at the KEK 12-GeV proton synchrotron.
127: Detector elements are described in Ref.~\cite{detector}.
128: In this experiment, the $K_{\mu3}$ decay of a stopped $K^+$ is identified
129: by detecting the
130: $\pi^0$ as well as the $\mu^+$ from the decay. The E246
131: setup is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:setup}.
132: \begin{figure}[htbp]
133: \centering\includegraphics[width=150mm,angle=0]{s2.eps}
134: \caption{Setup; (a) side view, (b) front view, and
135: (c) one sector of the polarimeter.}
136: \label{fig:setup}
137: \end{figure}
138: A 660-MeV/c kaon beam is slowed down in a degrader and stopped in a
139: scintillating fiber target.
140: The energy and direction of the $\pi^{0}$ from the $K_{\mu3}$ decay are
141: measured by a segmented CsI(Tl) photon detector installed in the central
142: region of a superconducting toroidal magnet. A muon from the
143: $K_{\mu3}$ decay at rest is momentum--analyzed in magnet gaps
144: by tracking in
145: the stopping target, a scintillating ring
146: hodoscope surrounding
147: the target, and three MWPCs (C2, C3, C4). The muon exiting the spectrometer
148: is stopped in a polarimeter
149: in which the decay positron asymmetry $A_T$ is measured in order to obtain
150: $P_T$. The polarimeter consists of 12 azimuthally arranged Al stoppers,
151: aligned
152: with the magnet gaps, with scintillator counter system located between the
153: magnet gaps.
154: A positron from the decay of $\mu^+\to e^{+}\nu\bar{\nu}$ is detected
155: by plastic scintillator counters located between the stoppers.
156:
157: In the new analysis, the $K_{\mu3}$ event selection
158: is similar to~\cite{prl99}. The $\mu^+$ momentum region of
159: 100--190 MeV/$c$ was used to remove the $K_{\pi2}$ decays. Most of the
160: muons from pion decay in flight in $K_{\pi2}$
161: are rejected by using the $\chi^2$ cut in tracking.
162: Neutral pions from the $K_{\mu3}$ decay are identified either
163: by $\gamma-\gamma$ coincidence in the CsI and applying a
164: cut on the pion invariant mass~($2\gamma$ events),
165: or by
166: one detected photon with large $E_{\gamma}$~($1\gamma$ events).
167: The $K_{e3}$ events which also satisfy these requirements are
168: removed by time-of-flight. In-flight kaon
169: decays were suppressed by a
170: requiring a delayed decay after a $K^+$ is stopped.
171: The ``good" $K_{\mu3}$ events were separated
172: into two classes:
173: $fwd$ events with the angle between $\pi^0 (\gamma)$ and beam direction
174: $\theta_{\pi^0,\gamma} < 70^{\circ}$ and $bwd$ events with
175: $\theta_{\pi^0,\gamma} > 110^{\circ}$.
176:
177: The signal was extracted by integrating the positron time spectrum
178: from
179: $\mu^+\to e^+\nu\bar{\nu}$ decays of muons stopped in the
180: polarimeter
181: after subtraction of the background.
182: The T-violating asymmetry $A_T$ is obtained as a difference in the counting
183: rate between clockwise ($cw$) and counter-clockwise ($ccw$) emitted positrons.
184: Summing of the $cw$ ($N_{cw}$) and $ccw$ ($N_{ccw}$) positron counts over
185: all
186: 12 sectors, $A_T$ is derived from
187: \begin{equation}
188: A_T = \frac{1}{4}
189: \Bigl [ \frac{(N_{cw}/N_{ccw})_{fwd}}{(N_{cw}/N_{ccw})_{bwd}} - 1 \Bigr ].
190: \end{equation}
191: Then, $P_T = A_T/(\alpha\cdot f)$,
192: where the analyzing power of the polarimeter is $\alpha = 0.281\pm 0.015$,
193: obtained from asymmetry measurement
194: of the in-plane component of $\mu^+$ polarization, $P_N$, by selecting
195: $\pi^0$s emitted transverse to the beam and comparing to a Monte Carlo
196: calculation.
197: The kinematic attenuation factor $f$ results from accepting
198: $fwd$ and $bwd$ events with $|{\rm cos}\theta_{\pi^0,\gamma}| > 0.342$ and
199: was also
200: obtained from a Monte Carlo calculation. It has different values for
201: $1\gamma$ and $2\gamma$ events: $f = 0.72-0.77$ for $2\gamma$
202: and $f = 0.56-0.66$ for $1\gamma$ events, depending on the background
203: level in the CsI. Then,
204: ${\rm Im}(\xi) = P_T/\Phi$, where $\Phi\simeq 0.33(0.29)$ for
205: $2\gamma$ ($1\gamma$) events is a kinematic factor
206: obtained from the analysis of the $K_{\mu3}$ Dalitz distribution.
207:
208: The contamination of the beam accidental backgrounds in ``good" $K_{\mu3}$
209: events was about 8\%~($2\gamma$),
210: $\sim 9$\%~($1\gamma$), and the constant background in the polarimeter
211: was $11-12$\%. These backgrounds only diluted the sensitivity to $P_T$
212: by 10\%, but they did not produce any spurious T-violating asymmetry.
213: The main systematics uncertainties in $P_T$ come from the two
214: large in-plane components
215: of the $\mu^+$ polarization, $P_L$ which is
216: parallel to
217: the muon momentum and $P_N$ ($P_T\ll P_{N,L}\leq 1$).
218: The largest systematic errors are due to the misalignment of
219: the polarimeter, the asymmetry of magnetic field distribution, and the
220: asymmetrical kaon stopping distribution. Most of these effects are canceled
221: by the azimuthal symmetry of the detector
222: as well as by
223: the $fwd/bwd$ ratio. For example, the effect of the kaon stopping
224: distribution is reduced by more than a factor of 10~\cite{kudenko02}. The total
225: systematic error of $P_T$ is estimated to be the same as that of
226: the previous result~\cite{prl99}.
227:
228: The data analysis was performed by two independent groups. Both analyses
229: obtained consistent results for 1996-97 data set (see Ref.~\cite{prl99}).
230: The result
231: for 1998-2000 data set was obtained by one of the analyses.
232: \section{Result}
233: In 1998--2000 we selected
234: about $4.4 \times 10^6$ ``good"
235: $K_{\mu3}$ events. To check the stability of the result, all
236: data--taking periods, including 1996-97, were divided roughly in
237: 100-hour time intervals, and $A_T$
238: for $1\gamma$ and $2\gamma$ events in each interval were calculated. The
239: results are presented
240: in Fig.~\ref{fig:asymmetry}.
241: \begin{figure}[htb]
242: \centering\includegraphics[width=104mm,angle=0]{asy2.eps}
243: \caption{T-violating asymmetry consistency check for $2\gamma$ and $1\gamma$
244: $K_{\mu3}$ events.
245: Independent statistical errors are shown. Vertical arrows separate
246: three long beam cycles. For 1996-97 cycle the results of one of the analyses are
247: plotted.
248: }
249: %Each point corresponds to roughly 100-hour period of
250: %data taking.
251: \label{fig:asymmetry}
252: \end{figure}
253: The average asymmetries for both classes of events are consistent with zero
254: within a $\pm 1\sigma$ interval.
255:
256: Combining the new and previous
257: results\footnote[1]{For the previous result the newly obtained value of $\alpha$
258: was also applied}, we obtain preliminary
259: $P_T = (-1.12\pm 2.17(stat)\pm 0.90(syst))\times 10^{-3}$
260: and
261: Im$(\xi)= (-0.28\pm 0.69(stat) \pm 0.30(syst))\times 10^{-2}$,
262: consistent with no T-violation in $K_{\mu3}$.
263: \begin{thebibliography}{9}
264: %\cite{Bigi:yz}
265: \bibitem{bigi}
266: I.~I.~Bigi and A.~I.~Sanda,
267: %``CP Violation,''
268: CP violation, Cambridge Monogr.\ Part.\ Phys.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ Cosmol.\ {\bf 9}, 1 (2000);
269: %%CITATION = 00315,9,1;%%
270: E.~Golowich and G.~Valencia,
271: %``Triple Product Correlations In Semileptonic B+- Decays,''
272: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 40}, 112 (1989).
273: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D40,112;%%
274: %\cite{Belanger:1991vx}
275: \bibitem{geng}
276: G.~Belanger and C.~Q.~Geng,
277: %``T violating muon polarization in K(mu-3) decays,''
278: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 44}, 2789 (1991);
279: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D44,2789;%%
280: C.~Q.~Geng and S.~K.~Lee,
281: %``Analysis of transverse muon polarization in K+ $\to$ pi0 mu+ neutrino and K+ $\to$ mu+ neutrino gamma decays with tensor interactions,''
282: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 51}, 99 (1995)
283: [arXiv:hep-ph/9410347];
284: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9410347;%%
285: M.~Kobayashi, T.~T.~Lin and Y.~Okada,
286: %``Time reversal violation in K+ $\to$ mu+ neutrino gamma decay and three Higgs model,''
287: Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ {\bf 95}, 361 (1996)
288: [arXiv:hep-ph/9507225];
289: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9507225;%%
290: G.~H.~Wu and J.~N.~Ng,
291: %``T-violation in K+ $\to$ mu+ nu gamma decay and supersymmetry,''
292: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 55}, 2806 (1997)
293: [arXiv:hep-ph/9610533];
294: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9610533;%%
295: M.~Fabbrichesi and F.~Vissani,
296: %``The supersymmetric prediction for the muon transverse polarization in the K+ $\to$ pi0 mu+ nu/mu decay,''
297: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 55}, 5334 (1997)
298: [arXiv:hep-ph/9611237].
299: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9611237;%%
300: %\cite{Zhitnitsky:he}
301: \bibitem{fsi}
302: A.~R.~Zhitnitsky,
303: %``The Weinberg Model Of The CP Violation And T Odd Correlations In Weak Decays. (In Russian),''
304: Sov.\ J.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 31}, 529 (1980)
305: [Yad.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 31}, 1024 (1980)];
306: %%CITATION = SJNCA,31,529;%%
307: V.~P.~Efrosinin {\it et al.},
308: %``Transverse muon polarization in K+- $\to$ pi0 mu+- nu decay induced by the two-photon final-state interaction,''
309: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 493}, 293 (2000)
310: [arXiv:hep-ph/0008199].
311: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0008199;%%
312: \bibitem{cabibbo} N.~Cabibbo and A.~Maksymowicz, Phys. Lett. {\bf 9}
313: (1964) 352; {\bf 11} (1964) 360(E); {\bf 14} (1965) 72(E).
314: %%CITATION = NONE;%%
315: %\cite{Abe:1999nc}
316: \bibitem{prl99}
317: M.~Abe {\it et al.} [KEK-E246 Collaboration],
318: %``Search for T-violating transverse muon polarization in K+ $\to$ pi0 mu+ nu decay using stopped kaons,''
319: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 83}, 4253 (1999);
320: %%CITATION = PRLTA,83,4253;%%
321: M.~Abe {\it et al.} [KEK-E246 Collaboration],
322: %``Test Of Time Reversal Invariance In The Decay K+ $\to$ Pi0 Mu+ Nu,''
323: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 663}, 919 (2000).
324: %%CITATION = NUPHA,A663,919;%%
325: %\cite{Ivashkin:sa}
326: \bibitem{detector}
327: A.~P.~Ivashkin {\it et al.},
328: %``Scintillation Ring Hodoscope With Wls Fiber Readout,''
329: Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Meth.\ A {\bf 394}, 321 (1997);
330: %%CITATION = NUIMA,A394,321;%%
331: D.~V.~Dementyev {\it et al.},
332: %``Csi(Tl) Photon Detector With Pin Photodiode Readout For A K(Mu3) T-Violation Experiment,''
333: Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Meth.\ A {\bf 440}, 151 (2000);
334: %%CITATION = NUIMA,A440,151;%%
335: M.~M.~Khabibullin {\it et al.},
336: %``Csi(Tl)-Calorimeter Calibration With Positive Kaon Decay Products,''
337: Instrum.\ Exp.\ Tech.\ {\bf 43}, 589 (2000)
338: [Prib.\ Tekh.\ Eksp.\ {\bf N5}, 9 (2000)].
339: %%CITATION = INETA,43,589;%%
340: %\cite{Kudenko:2002az}
341: \bibitem{Kudenko02}
342: Y.~G.~Kudenko,
343: %``Performance of a CsI(Tl) calorimeter in an experiment with stopped K+'s,''
344: Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Meth.\ A {\bf 494}, 318 (2002) [arXiv:physics/0205045].
345: %%CITATION = PHYS-ICS 0205045;%%physics/0205045.
346:
347: \end{thebibliography}
348:
349: \end{document}
350:
351: