1: % This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 4 distribution.L
2: % Version 4.0 of REVTeX, August 2001
3: %
4: % Copyright (c) 2001 The American Physical Society.
5: %
6: % See the REVTeX 4 README file for restrictions and more information.
7: %
8: % TeX'ing this file requires that you have AMS-LaTeX 2.0 installed
9: % as well as the rest of the prerequisites for REVTeX 4.0
10: %
11: % See the REVTeX 4 README file
12: % It also requires running BibTeX. The commands are as follows:
13: %
14: % 1) latex apssamp.tex
15: % 2) bibtex apssamp
16: % 3) latex apssamp.tex
17: % 4) latex apssamp.tex
18: %
19: \documentclass[aps,prl,twocolumn,sortedauthors,superscriptaddress,groupedaddress]{revtex4}
20: %\documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
21: \bibliographystyle{apsrev}
22: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
23: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
24: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
25:
26: \begin{document}
27:
28: \preprint{hep-ex/xxxxx}
29: \title{Search for $\pi^0 \to \nu_{\mu}\bar\nu_{\mu}$ Decay in LSND}
30: \affiliation{University of California, Riverside, CA 92521}
31: \affiliation{University of California, San Diego, CA 92093}
32: \affiliation{University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106}
33: \affiliation{Embry Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott, AZ 86301}
34: \affiliation{Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545}
35: \affiliation{Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803}
36: \affiliation{Southern University, Baton Rouge, LA 70813}
37: \affiliation{Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122}
38: \author{L.B. Auerbach}\affiliation{Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122}
39: \author{R.L. Burman}\affiliation{Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545}
40: \author{D.O. Caldwell}\affiliation{University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106}
41: \author{E.D. Church}\altaffiliation{Present address: Prediction Company LLC, Sante Fe, NM 87505}\affiliation{University of California, Riverside, CA 92521}
42: \author{A.K. Cochran}\affiliation{Southern University, Baton Rouge, LA 70813}
43: \author{J.B. Donahue}\affiliation{Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM
44: 87545}
45: \author{A.R. Fazely}\email{fazely@phys.subr.edu}\affiliation{Southern University, Baton Rouge, LA 70813}
46: \author{G.T. Garvey}\affiliation{Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM
47: 87545}
48: \author{R.M. Gunasingha}\affiliation{Southern University, Baton Rouge, LA 70813}
49: \author{R.L. Imlay}\affiliation{Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803}
50: \author{G. Kahrimanis}\affiliation{Southern University, Baton Rouge, LA 70813}
51: \author{W.C. Louis}\affiliation{Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM
52: 87545}
53: \author{R. Majkic}\affiliation{Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122}
54: \author{A. Malik}\affiliation{Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803}
55: \author{K.L. McIlhany}\affiliation{University of California, Riverside, CA 92521}
56: \author{W.J. Metcalf}\affiliation{Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803}
57: \author{G.B. Mills}\affiliation{Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM
58: 87545}
59: \author{D. Rupnik}\affiliation{Southern University, Baton Rouge, LA 70813}
60: \author{V.D. Sandberg}\affiliation{Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545}
61: \author{D. Smith}\affiliation{Embry Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott, AZ 86301}
62: \author{R.F. Somodi}\affiliation{Southern University, Baton Rouge, LA 70813}
63: \author{I. Stancu}\altaffiliation{Present address: Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487}
64: \author{W.D. Strossman}\affiliation{University of California, Riverside, CA 92521}
65: \author{M. Sung}\affiliation{Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803}
66: \author{R. Tayloe}\altaffiliation{Present address: Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405}\affiliation{Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM
67: 87545}
68: \author{G.J. VanDalen}\altaffiliation{Present address: Embry Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott, AZ 86301}\affiliation{University of California, Riverside, CA 92521}
69: \author{W. Vernon}\affiliation{University of California, San Diego, CA 92093}
70: \author{N. Wadia}\affiliation{Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803}
71: \author{D.H. White}\affiliation{Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM
72: 87545}
73: \author{S. Yellin}\affiliation{University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106}
74: \author{H. Yi}\affiliation{Southern University, Baton Rouge, LA 70813}
75: \noaffiliation
76: %\affiliation{University of California, Riverside, CA 92521}
77: %\affiliation{University of California, San Diego, CA 92093}
78: %\affiliation{University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106}
79: %\affiliation{Embry Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott, AZ 86301}
80: %\affiliation{Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545}
81: %\affiliation{Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803}
82: %\affiliation{Southern University, Baton Rouge, LA 70813}
83: %\affiliation{Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122}
84: %\collaboration can be followed by \email, \homepage, \thanks as well.
85: \collaboration{LSND Collaboration}
86: \noaffiliation
87: \date{\today}
88:
89: \begin{abstract}
90: We observe a net beam-excess of
91: $8.7 \pm 6.3$ (stat) $\pm 2.4$ (syst) events, above 160 MeV,
92: resulting from the charged-current reaction of
93: $\nu_{\mu}$ and/or $\bar\nu_{\mu}$ on C and H in the LSND detector.
94: No beam related muon background is expected in this energy regime.
95: Within an analysis framework of $\pi^0 \to \nu_{\mu}\bar\nu_{\mu}$, we set a
96: direct upper limit for this branching ratio of
97: ${\Gamma}({\pi}^0{\rightarrow}{\nu}_{\mu}{\bar{\nu}_{\mu}})/{\Gamma}({\pi}^0{\to}all)<1.6 \times10^{-6}$ at $90\%$ confidence level.
98: \end{abstract}
99:
100: \pacs{13.30.Eg, 14.40.Aq, 14.60.St}
101:
102: \maketitle
103:
104: The observation of the decay $\pi^0\to \nu\bar\nu$ would imply new
105: interesting physics. The pion has zero spin and odd intrinsic parity
106: (i.e. $J^P=0^-$), and it is represented by a wave function which has the
107: space transformation properties under inversion and rotation of a
108: pseudoscalar.
109: Momentum and angular
110: momentum conservation require that the decay $\nu$ and $\bar\nu$ possess
111: the same helicity. This decay provides an ideal laboratory to search for
112: the pseudoscalar (P)
113: weak interaction, because only the P interaction allows massless neutrinos and
114: antineutrinos with
115: the same helicity in the final state.
116: Furthermore, if the neutrino mass is not zero and the
117: $Z^0$ couples to the right-handed neutrino with standard weak-interaction
118: strength, the branching ratio (BR) $B(\pi^0\to\nu_\mu \bar\nu_\mu)$
119: has a maximum value of
120: $5.4\times10^{-14}$ at the $\nu_\mu$ mass upper limit of $m(\nu_{\mu}) =
121: 0.19$ MeV/c$^2$ \cite{pdg}.
122: It is noteworthy that a BR of $\approx 10^{-14}$ for
123: $\pi^0\to \nu\nu\gamma$ within the Standard Model is allowed.
124: Therefore, an observed BR $B(\pi^0\to\nu_\mu \bar\nu_\mu) >>
125: 5 \times 10^{-14}$ would imply physics beyond the Standard Model.
126:
127: To date limits have been set on $\pi^0 \to \nu\bar\nu$ derived from pion
128: production in beam stops.
129: An experimental upper limit, $\Gamma(\pi^0\to\nu_{\mu}\bar{\nu_{\mu}})/
130: \Gamma(\pi^0\to all) \leq 3.1 \times 10^{-6}$ at $90\%$ confidence level (CL), was set by
131: Hoffman \cite{hoff} by using the data from several beam-dump
132: experiments. Similar limits were obtained by Dorenbosch et al. \cite{dorn}.
133: An inclusive search for $\pi^0 \to \nu\bar\nu$ using
134: $K^+ \to \pi^+\pi^0$ has set an upper limit of $8.3 \times 10^{-7}
135: (90\%$ CL) \cite{atiy}.
136:
137: The Liquid Scintillator Neutrino Detector (LSND) experiment was performed
138: at the Los Alamos Neutron Scattering Center (LANSCE).
139: An 800-MeV beam of protons incident on a predominantly water-copper target
140: provided the source for the $\pi^0$. This energy is well below kaon
141: production threshold, and almost
142: all pions are produced from p-nucleus interactions.
143: The detector,
144: located 30 m from the beam stop, contained 167 tons of dilute liquid
145: scintillator which served as the active target. The liquid scintillator was
146: viewed by 1220, 8"-diameter Hamamatsu photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) mounted
147: inside
148: the tank. An active shield with 292, 5"-diameter PMTs vetoed cosmic
149: rays \cite{napt}. The read-out and the data acquisition system are
150: described in more detail elsewhere \cite{ath97}.
151:
152: The $\pi^0$ production rate was calculated using the LSND beam Monte Carlo (MC)
153: \cite{burm}. As the $\pi^0$ spectrum is expected to be very similar to that
154: of the $\pi^+$,
155: in these calculations the $\pi^+ \rightarrow e^+ \nu_e$ decay mode was used, where
156: a lifetime of $8.4 \times 10^{-16} s$ ($\pi^0$ lifetime) was assigned
157: to the $\pi^+$.
158: Assuming that all $\pi^0$'s decay to two neutrinos, the neutrino
159: flux is calculated to be $(6.5 \pm 1.6) \times 10^{14} \nu_{\mu}/cm^2$ at the
160: center of the detector above the muon production threshold of 123 MeV for
161: the entire running time of the LSND detector. The error estimate is based on
162: the values quoted by Burman and Plischke \cite{burm1}.
163: Fig. \ref{neutrino} shows the
164: neutrino spectrum resulting from the possible $\pi^0\to\nu_\mu \bar\nu_\mu$
165: decay at the center of the LSND detector.
166: Note that the peak between 70 and 80
167: MeV is due to multiple pion production \cite{burm1}. For comparison, Fig.
168: \ref{neutrino}
169: also shows the $\nu_\mu$ spectrum from the usual
170: $\pi^{+} \to \mu^{+}\nu_{\mu}$ decay-in-flight (DIF) multiplied by 10.
171: \begin{figure}
172: \resizebox{9.0cm}{9.0cm}{\includegraphics[0,0][567,567]{neutrino}}
173: \caption{\label{neutrino}The neutrino energy spectrum resulting from the possible $\pi^0\to\nu_\mu \bar\nu_\mu$ decay at the beam stop and as seen at the
174: center of the LSND detector. The dashed curve shows the energy spectrum of neutrinos from $\pi^+$ DIF.}
175: \end{figure}
176:
177: The results presented here were obtained during the 1993-1998 LSND operation
178: periods. A total of 28,896 Coulombs of protons were incident on the beam stop.
179: The dominant interactions inside the LSND detector were
180: $\nu_{\mu} +^{12}C\to\mu^- +p +X$, $\bar\nu_{\mu} +^{12}C\to \mu^+ +n +X$ and
181: $\bar\nu_{\mu} +p\to\mu^+ +n$.
182: The flux-averaged cross sections for these reactions are estimated to be
183: $(3.0 \pm 0.6) {\times}10^{-38} cm^2$, $(0.60 \pm 0.12) {\times}10^{-38} cm^2$, and
184: $(0.20 \pm 0.01) {\times}10^{-38} cm^2$, respectively, from a Fermi-Gas model
185: (FGM)
186: of Gaisser and O'Connell \cite{gais}. The estimated errors are from the
187: uncertainties for the FGM calculations
188: quoted by Vogel \cite{petr}. The ${\mu}$ in each of the
189: above reactions usually decays and produces a Michel electron.
190: The $\pi^0 \to \nu_{\mu}\bar\nu_{\mu}$ search
191: focused on identifying high-energy, muon-like beam excess
192: events in the energy range between 160 MeV and 600 MeV electron equivalent
193: (MeVee).
194: The lower cut of 160 MeVee is obtained
195: because the end-point energy of muon neutrinos is about 280 MeV and the
196: muon production threshold is 123 MeV. This cut, therefore, insures that
197: beam-related background $\mu$ events are negligible \cite{auer}.
198: The upper energy cut was chosen because the end-point energy of the neutrinos
199: is about 730 MeV and the muon production
200: threshold is 123 MeV.
201:
202: The majority of the triggers (99{\%}) were cosmic-ray
203: induced and were classified as
204: through-going muons,
205: electrons from stopping muon decays,
206: recoil protons from neutron collisions, and
207: $^{12}B_{g.s.}$ decay resulting from ${\mu}^-$ capture on $^{12}C$.
208: In order to minimize the background induced by cosmic rays,
209: a Michel electron was selected for the current event that satisfied
210: an energy cut
211: of $20<E<55$ MeV.
212: The reconstructed electron vertex was required to be inside a fiducial
213: volume 35 cm from
214: the face of the PMTs.
215: The particle identification parameter, ${\chi}_l^{'}$, from reference
216: \cite{agui} was used to select electrons and was required to satisfy
217: $-1.5<{\chi}_l{'}<0.5$, where the allowed range is chosen by
218: maximizing the
219: selection efficiency divided by the square root of the beam-off background.
220: A veto cut of less than 4 hits was applied to reduce cosmic rays.
221: Events with future activity within $9\,\mu\mbox{s}$ ($\approx 4 \mu $ lifetimes)
222: or with a bottom veto counter hit
223: were rejected in order to further eliminate cosmic-ray muon events.
224: Furthermore, no
225: veto hit was allowed within 30 ns of the trigger time. These cuts and their
226: associated efficiencies
227: for the selection of primary electrons are summarized in Table \ref{michel_eff}.
228: \begin{table}
229: \caption{Selection criteria and corresponding efficiency for the primary
230: Michel electron.}
231: \vspace{0.4 cm}
232: \begin{center}
233: \begin{tabular}{l l c} \hline\hline
234: Selection Criteria & & Efficiency \\ \hline
235: Veto Live Time & & $0.76\,{\pm}\,0.02$\\
236: DAQ Live Time & & $0.96\,{\pm}\,0.02$ \\ \hline
237: & Analysis Efficiency & \\ \hline
238: Electron Energy &$20\,<\,E\,<\,55\,\,MeV$ & $0.98\,{\pm}\,0.02$ \\
239: Fiducial Volume & $D\,>\,35\,\,cm$ & $0.88\,{\pm}\,0.02$ \\
240: Particle ID & $-1.5<\chi_{l}^{'}<0.5$ & $0.84\,{\pm}\,0.01$ \\
241: Shield and Crack Hits &$\,<\,4$ & $0.98\,{\pm}\,0.01$ \\
242: Future Time Gate &${\Delta}t_{future}\,>\, 9\,\,\mu\mbox{s}$ & $0.99\,{\pm}\,0.01$\\
243: In-time Veto Gate &${\Delta}t^{best}_{veto}\,>\,30\,\,ns$ & $0.97\,{\pm}\,0.01$\\\hline
244: Total in-time Cuts & & $0.50\,{\pm}\,0.03$\\ \hline\hline
245: \end{tabular}
246: \end{center}
247: \label{michel_eff}
248: \end{table}
249: A second set of cuts was applied to isolate parent muons. These cuts are
250: similar to those of reference [11]. Muons were
251: required to have a decay time of less than $9 \mu$s.
252: An energy
253: cut between 160 MeV and 600 MeV was chosen to eliminate possible muons from
254: beam-related $\pi^+$ DIF.
255: A spatial $\mu-e$ correlation distance cut of less than 100 cm was applied.
256: The muon vertex was required to be
257: within a fiducial volume of 35 cm from the face of the PMT.
258: A veto cut of less than 2 hits was applied to further reduce cosmic rays.
259: These cuts and their corresponding
260: efficiencies are
261: summarized in Table \ref{muon_eff}.
262:
263: \begin{table}
264: \caption{Selection criteria and corresponding efficiency for the parent muon.}
265: \vspace{0.4 cm}
266: \begin{center}
267: \begin{tabular}{l l c} \hline\hline
268: Selection Criteria & & Efficiency \\ \hline
269: Muon decay time & $0.7<\tau_{\mu}<9\,\,{\mu}s$ & 0.74${\pm}$0.01 \\
270: Uncaptured $\mu^-$ & - & 0.97${\pm}$0.01 \\
271: Past Energy & $160\,\,MeV<E<600\,\,MeV$ & 0.64$\pm$0.01 \\
272: Spatial Correlation &$\,<\,100\,\,cm$ & 0.99${\pm}$0.01 \\
273: Fiducial Volume & $\,>\,35\,\,cm$ & 0.75${\pm}$0.01 \\
274: Shield and Crack Hits &$\,<\,2$ &0.87${\pm}$0.01 \\ \hline
275: Total Past Cuts & & 0.30${\pm}$0.01 \\ \hline\hline
276: \end{tabular}
277: \end{center}
278: \label{muon_eff}
279: \end{table}
280: The overall efficiency of these cuts
281: was $0.15 \pm 0.01$, which resulted in a total of 38 beam-on events and
282: 473 beam-off events.
283: After applying the duty factor ratio of $0.062 \pm 0.005$,
284: the normalized number of beam-off events was $29.3 \pm 1.3 \pm 2.4$, resulting
285: in a beam-excess of $8.7 \pm 6.3 \pm 2.4$ events.
286: Fig. \ref{excess_mu} shows the visible energy distribution for
287: beam-on, beam-off, and beam-excess events. Also shown in the beam-excess
288: figure
289: is the area normalized GEANT-3.21 MC calculation. The calculation uses the
290: neutrino spectrum of Fig. 1 and generates muons and knock-out protons
291: based on the Fermi-gas model of reference [9].
292:
293: \begin{figure}
294: \resizebox{9.0cm}{9.0cm}{\includegraphics[0,0][567,567]{excess_e_ncut.eps}}
295: \caption{\label{excess_mu}The visible energy distribution for
296: beam-on, beam-off, and beam-excess events. The solid line represents
297: the MC calculation.}
298: \end{figure}
299: Fig. \ref{excess_r} shows the spatial correlation between the muons and
300: the Michel electrons for the beam-off, beam-on, and beam-excess events.
301: The MC calculation
302: is shown as the solid line on the beam-excess histogram.
303: \begin{figure}
304: \resizebox{9.0cm}{9.0cm}{\includegraphics[0,0][567,567]{excess_r_ncut.eps}}
305: \caption{\label{excess_r}Distance between muon and electron for beam-on, beam-off and beam-excess events. The solid line represents the MC calculation.}
306: \end{figure}
307: Fig. \ref{excess_t} shows
308: the time correlation between the muons and the Michel electrons for the
309: beam-on, the beam-off and the beam-excess events. The usual decay-at-rest muon
310: lifetime curves, $e^{t/2.12\mu{s}}$ are superimposed for comparison. Note
311: the choice of 2.12 $\mu\mbox{s}$ for muon lifetime is because the detected
312: muons are a mixture of $\mu^-$ and $\mu^+$.
313: \begin{figure}[h]
314: \resizebox{9.0cm}{9.0cm}{\includegraphics[0,0][567,567]{excess_t_ncut.eps}}
315: \caption{\label{excess_t}Muon lifetime for beam-on, beam-off and beam-excess
316: events. The superimposed solid curves represent the expected
317: $e^{-t/2.12\,\mu{s}}$ exponential decay of muons at rest.}
318: \end{figure}
319:
320: The upper limit to the BR for the $\pi^0 \to \nu_{\mu}\bar\nu_{\mu}$
321: decay is calculated using the values for
322: the neutrino reaction
323: cross section ($3.8 \pm 0.8) \times 10^{-38} cm^2$), the neutrino flux
324: ($(6.5 \pm 1.6) \times 10^{14} \nu/cm^2$), the total number of target atoms
325: ($(3.7 \pm 0.1) \times 10^{30}$),
326: and the overall efficiency ($0.15 \pm 0.01$).
327: If the small excess is due to
328: $\pi^0 \to \nu_{\mu}\bar\nu_{\mu}$ decay, then the corresponding BR is
329: %\begin{center}
330: ${\Gamma}({\pi}^0{\to}{\nu}_{\mu}{\bar{\nu}_{\mu}})/{\Gamma}({\pi}^0{\to}all)=[6.4\pm 4.6 (stat)\pm 3.3 (syst)]\times10^{-7},$
331: %\end{center}
332: which corresponds to an upper limit of
333: %\begin{center}
334: ${\Gamma}({\pi}^0{\to}{\nu}_{\mu}{\bar{\nu}_{\mu}})/{\Gamma}({\pi}^0{\to}all)<1.6\times10^{-6}$ at $90\%$ CL.
335: %\end{center}
336:
337: In summary, a beam-excess of $8.7 \pm 6.3$ (stat) $\pm 2.4$
338: (syst) events is observed above an
339: energy of 160 MeV, where no beam related background is expected.
340: Within the framework of
341: $\pi^0 \to \nu\bar\nu$, a direct upper limit for this BR of
342: $1.6 \times 10^{-6}$ at $90\%$ CL is obtained.
343:
344: We are grateful to the administrative and technical
345: staff members of LANSCE for their support
346: during this experiment.
347: We also gratefully acknowledge Drs. Cyrus Hoffman, Peter Herczeg,
348: and Lon Chang Liu for enlightening discussions. This work was supported in
349: part by the U.S. Department of Energy.
350:
351: %\bibliography{pi0}
352: \begin{thebibliography}{12}
353: \bibitem{pdg} Particle Data Group, K. Hagiwara {\em et al.,} Phys. Rev. D{\bf66}, 010001 (2002).
354: \bibitem{hoff} C.M. Hoffman, Phys. Lett. B{\bf 208}, 149 (1988).
355: \bibitem{dorn} J. Dorenbosch, {\em et al.}, Z. Phys. C{\bf40}, 497 (1988).
356: \bibitem{atiy} M. S. Atiya, {\em et al.} Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 66}, 2189 (1991),and Particle Data Group, K. Hagiwara {\em et al.,} Phys. Rev. D{\bf66}, 010001 (2002).
357: \bibitem{napt} J.J Napolitano {\em et al.,} Nucl. Inst. Meth. A{\bf274}, 152 (1989).
358: \bibitem{ath97} LSND Collaboration, C.A. Athanassopoulos, {\em et. al.}, Nucl. Inst. Meth. Phys. Res. A{\bf388}, 149 (1997).
359: \bibitem{burm} R.L. Burman, M.E. Potter, and E.S. Smith, Nucl. Inst. Meth. Phys. Res. A {\bf291}, 621 (1990).
360: \bibitem{burm1} R.L. Burman and P. Plischke, Nucl. Inst. Meth. Phys. Res. A {\bf398}, 147 (1997).
361: \bibitem{gais} T.K. Gaisser and J.S. O'Connell, Phys. Rev. D{\bf34}, 822 (1986).
362: \bibitem{petr} P. Vogel, nucl-th/9901027, WEIN98, Physics Beyond the Standard
363: Model, 204-221, P. Herczeg, C. M. Hoffman, and H. V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus,
364: eds., World Scientific, Singapore, (1999).
365: \bibitem{auer} LSND Collaboration, L.B. Auerbach, {\em et. al.}, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 66}, 015501 (2002).
366: \bibitem{agui} LSND Collaboration, A. Aguilar, {\em et. al.}, Phys. Rev. D {\bf64}, 112007 (2001).
367: \end{thebibliography}
368: \end{document}
369: