1: %%%%%%%%%% espcrc2.tex %%%%%%%%%%
2: %
3: % $Id: espcrc2.tex 1.2 2000/07/24 09:12:51 spepping Exp spepping $
4: %
5: \documentclass[fleqn,twoside]{article}
6: \usepackage{espcrc2}
7:
8: % change this to the following line for use with LaTeX2.09
9: % \documentstyle[twoside,fleqn,espcrc2]{article}
10:
11: % if you want to include PostScript figures
12: \usepackage{graphicx}
13: % if you have landscape tables
14: \usepackage[figuresright]{rotating}
15:
16: % put your own definitions here:
17: % \newcommand{\cZ}{\cal{Z}}
18: % \newtheorem{def}{Definition}[section]
19: % ...
20: \newcommand{\ttbs}{\char'134}
21: \newcommand{\AmS}{{\protect\the\textfont2
22: A\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox{M}\kern-.125emS}}
23: % A useful Journal macro
24: \def\Journal#1#2#3#4{{#1} {\bf #2}, #3 (#4)}
25:
26: % Some useful journal names
27: \def\NCA{Nuovo Cimento}
28: \def\NIM{Nucl. Instrum. Methods}
29: \def\NIMA{{Nucl. Instrum. Methods} A}
30: \def\NPB{{Nucl. Phys.} B}
31: \def\NPBs{{Nucl. Phys.} B (Proc. Suppl.)}
32: \def\PLB{{Phys.Lett.}B}
33: \def\PRL{Phys. Rev. Lett.}
34: \def\PRD{{Phys. Rev.} D}
35: \def\ZPC{{Z. Phys.} C}
36: \def\APJ{Astrophys. J.}
37: \def\SNP{Sov. Jour. Nucl. Phys.}
38: \newcommand{\plumin}[2]{^{+#1}_{-#2}}
39: \newcommand{\plum}[2]{\matrix{+#1\\[-3pt]-#2}}
40: \newcommand{\plumi}[2]{\matrix{+#1\\[-1.2mm]-#2}}
41:
42: \def\dmsq{\Delta m^2}
43: \def\sisq{\sin^2\theta}
44: \def\tasq{\tan^2\theta}
45:
46: % add words to TeX's hyphenation exception list
47: \hyphenation{author another created financial paper re-commend-ed Post-Script}
48:
49: % declarations for front matter
50: \title{The Solar Neutrino Day/Night Effect in Super-Kamiokande}
51:
52: \author{Michael B. Smy {\em for the Super-Kamiokande Collaboration}\\
53: Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine,
54: CA 92697-4575}
55:
56: \begin{document}
57:
58: \begin{abstract}
59: The time variation of the elastic scattering rate of
60: solar neutrinos with electrons in Super-Kamiokande-I was fit
61: to the day/night variations expected from active two-neutrino
62: oscillations in the Large Mixing Angle region.
63: Combining Super-Kamiokande measurements with other solar and reactor neutrino data,
64: the mixing angle is determined as $\sisq=0.276\plumin{0.033}{0.026}$
65: and the mass squared difference between the two neutrino mass
66: eigenstates as
67: $\dmsq=7.1\plumin{0.6}{0.5}\times10^{-5}$eV$^2$.
68: For the best fit parameters, a day/night asymmetry
69: of $-1.7\pm1.6$(stat)$\plumin{1.3}{1.2}$(syst)\%
70: was determined from the Super-Kamiokande data, which
71: has improved statistical precision over previous measurements
72: and is in excellent agreement with the expected value
73: of $-1.6\%$.
74: \vspace{1pc}
75: \end{abstract}
76:
77: % typeset front matter (including abstract)
78: \maketitle
79:
80: \section{Introduction}
81:
82: The combined analysis of all solar neutrino experiments
83: \cite{solar} gives firm evidence for neutrino oscillations.
84: All data are well described using just two neutrino mass eigenstates
85: and imply a mass squared difference between $\dmsq=3\times10^{-5}$eV$^2$
86: and $\dmsq=1.9\times10^{-4}$eV$^2$ and a mixing angle between
87: $\tasq=0.25$ and $\tasq=0.65$~\cite{global}. This region
88: of parameter space is referred to as the Large Mixing Angle solution
89: (LMA). The rate and spectrum of reactor anti-neutrino interactions
90: in the KamLAND experiment~\cite{kl} are also well reproduced for these
91: mixing angles and some of these $\dmsq$.
92: Over the $\dmsq$ range of the LMA, solar $^8$B neutrinos are
93: $\approx$100\% resonantly converted into the second mass eigenstate
94: by the large matter density inside the sun~\cite{MSW}.
95: Therefore, the survival probability into $\nu_e$ is
96: $\approx\sin^2\theta$. However, due to the presence of the earth's matter
97: density, the oscillation probability at an experimental site on earth
98: into $\nu_e$ differs from $\sin^2\theta$ during the night. Since
99: Super-Kamiokande experiment is primarily sensitive to $\nu_e$'s, this induces
100: an apparent dependence of the measured neutrino interaction rate
101: on the solar zenith angle (often a regeneration of $\nu_e$'s during the night).
102: Recently, Super-Kamiokande employed
103: a maximum likelihood fit to the expected solar zenith angle
104: dependence on the neutrino interaction rate~\cite{skdn}.
105: Herein, the statistical uncertainty
106: was reduced by 25\% compared to previous measurement of the day/night
107: asymmetry~\cite{global} which consists of two flux measurements in
108: two separate data samples (day and night). It would require almost three
109: more years of running time to obtain a similar uncertainty reduction.
110: Also the GNO, SAGE, and SNO collaborations~\cite{solar}
111: reported updated neutrino interaction rates.
112:
113:
114: Super-Kamiokande (SK) is a 50,000 ton water Cherenkov detector described
115: in detail elsewhere~\cite{skdet}.
116: SK measures the energy, direction, and time of the
117: recoil electron from elastic scattering of solar neutrinos with electrons
118: by detection of the emitted Cherenkov light.
119: Super-Kamiokande started taking data in April, 1996.
120: In this report, the full SK-I low energy data set consisting of
121: 1496 live days
122: (May $31^{\mbox{st}}$, 1996 through July $15^{\mbox{th}}$, 2001)
123: is used.
124:
125: \begin{figure}
126: \includegraphics[width=3in]{adnsin.eps}
127: \caption{Fitted SK Day/Night Asymmetry as a Function of Mixing.
128: The $\dmsq$ is $6.3\times10^{-5}$eV$^2$.
129: The gray band is the $\pm1\sigma$ SK measurement.
130: The hatched area corresponds to the $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty of
131: the $^8$B flux by Junghans et al~\cite{BP2000}. The solid black line shows
132: the oscillation prediction of the day/night asymmetry.}
133: \label{fig:dnsin}
134: \end{figure}
135:
136:
137: \section{Day/Night Asymmetry}
138: The solar zenith angle $\theta_z$ between the solar direction
139: and the vertical direction defines the path length of the solar neutrino
140: inside the earth. During the day ($\cos\theta_z<0$) this path length
141: is zero, during the night ($\cos\theta_z>0$) it varies between zero
142: and (up to) the diameter of the earth.
143: The day/night rate asymmetry is defined as
144: \[
145: A_{\mbox{\tiny DN}}=\frac{D-N}{0.5(D+N)}
146: \]
147: where $D$ ($N$) refers to the average neutrino interaction rate during
148: the day (night). If the neutrino interaction rate during the night
149: varies significantly from the average night rate $N$, and if the
150: functional form (shape) of this variation is known, the amplitude of
151: this time variation of the rate can be determined more accurately
152: then just calculating $A_{\mbox{\tiny DN}}$
153: from the average rates. These conditions are met for two-neutrino oscillations
154: in the LMA region. In~\cite{skdn} a maximum likelihood fit to
155: the SK data finds a day/night amplitude equivalent to
156: $A_{\mbox{\small DN}}=-1.8\pm1.6$(stat)$\plumin{1.3}{1.2}$(syst)\%.
157: The fit assumes $\dmsq=6.3\times10^{-5}$eV$^2$
158: and $\tasq=0.55$.
159: The asymmetry calculated from the measured average day and night rates
160: on the other hand is
161: $A_{\mbox{\small DN}}=-2.1\pm2.0$(stat)$\plumin{1.3}{1.2}$(syst)\%~\cite{global}.
162: It assumes a step function for the time variation and therefore does not
163: reflect any oscillation parameters.
164: The dependence of the fitted day/night amplitude on the mixing angle
165: $\sisq$ is shown in Figure~\ref{fig:dnsin}. Overlaid are the predicted asymmetries
166: and the solar model constraint of the $^8$B neutrino flux from
167: Junghans et al~\cite{BP2000}.
168: The $\dmsq$ dependence is stronger
169: as can be seen in Figure~\ref{fig:dndm}. Overlaid are the
170: predicted asymmetries and bands (typically called
171: LMA-0, LMA-I, LMA-II, etc) corresponding to
172: the KamLAND 95\% allowed contours: the SK day/night
173: measurement excludes LMA-0, and favors LMA-I.
174:
175: \begin{figure}
176: \includegraphics[width=3in]{dnosc.eps}
177: \caption{Fitted SK Day/Night Asymmetry as a Function of $\dmsq$.
178: The gray band is the $\pm1\sigma$ SK measurement.
179: The hatched area corresponds to the 95\% allowed contours reported
180: by the KamLAND collaboration. The solid black line shows
181: the oscillation prediction of the day/night asymmetry.}
182: \label{fig:dndm}
183: \end{figure}
184:
185: \section{Full Oscillation Analysis}
186: An oscillation analysis of the SK data by itself is
187: found in~\cite{skdn}. It describes the solar zenith angle
188: variation with a likelihood, while the spectrum is fit
189: with a $\chi^2$ method.
190: Since the combined solar neutrino
191: oscillation analysis of~\cite{skdn} was performed,
192: the neutrino interaction rate measurements of several experiments
193: improved in precision. In particular, the SNO collaboration
194: reported a more precise neutral-current interaction rate on
195: deuterium employing salt to enhance neutron detection.
196: Figure~\ref{fig:sol3} shows in (dark gray)
197: the allowed regions at 95\%
198: C.L. resulting from the combination of experimental data
199: from Gallex/GNO, SAGE, the Homestake experiment and SK.
200: It relies on the $^8$B flux from Junghans and six
201: low energy neutrino fluxes of the standard solar
202: model~\cite{BP2000}. Also shown is a combined fit
203: to SK data, the new salt-enhanced SNO rate measurements, and
204: the SNO day/night asymmetry. This fit does not rely
205: on any neutrino flux prediction. Both analyses
206: yield a unique allowed region -- the LMA solution --
207: and agree very closely in mixing. The SK/SNO
208: analysis provides somewhat stronger constraints on
209: $\dmsq$.
210: Assuming CPT invariance, both fits are then combined
211: with a binned likelihood
212: analysis~\cite{ianni} of the KamLAND reactor anti-neutrino
213: measurements~\cite{kl}, the results of which are shown
214: in the right panel. In either case, only LMA-I remains
215: allowed.
216:
217: \begin{figure}
218: \noindent\hspace*{-0.18in}\includegraphics[width=3.15in]{sol3.eps}
219: \caption{Allowed Regions at 95\% C.L. from solar neutrino data
220: (left) and solar neutrino \& KamLAND (right) reactor neutrino data.
221: The functions at the top and right of each panel are the mariginalized
222: $\Delta\chi^2$ distributions.
223: The dark gray areas/solid lines
224: use the solar neutrino data from Gallex/GNO,
225: SAGE, Homestake \& SK the SSM neutrino fluxes
226: (and the Junghans $^8$B flux constraint),
227: the light gray areas/dashed lines) solar measurements from
228: SK \& SNO and no neutrino flux constraints from solar models.}
229: \label{fig:sol3}
230: \end{figure}
231:
232: SNO has also published a combined oscillation analysis,
233: which uses the SK zenith spectrum $\chi^2$ instead of the
234: likelihood employed in this report. Figure~\ref{fig:osc}
235: compares allowed areas of the combined fit to all data
236: using the SK likelihood (dark gray areas)
237: with SNO's contours at 95\% C.L. and $3\sigma$: the $\dmsq$
238: constraints get stronger when the SK zenith spectrum is replaced
239: by the SK likelihood. When combined with KamLAND, the
240: LMA-I is favored over all other solutions by $3.5\sigma$.
241: The $3\sigma$-allowed LMA-II contour from SNO's analysis
242: disappears, when the SK likelihood is used.
243: The oscillation $\chi^2$ is Gaussian;
244: the parameters are determined as
245: $\dmsq=7.1\plumin{0.6}{0.5}\times10^{-5}$eV$^2$ and
246: $\sisq=0.276\plumin{0.033}{0.026}$. At those
247: parameters, the day/night asymmetry is expected to
248: be $-1.6\%$ while the amplitude fit to SK data yields
249: $-1.7\pm1.6$(stat)$\plumin{1.3}{1.2}$(syst)\%.
250:
251: \begin{figure}
252: \noindent\hspace*{-0.18in}\includegraphics[width=3.15in]{osc.eps}
253: \caption{Allowed Regions at 95\% (dark gray, solid) and 99.73\% C.L. (dashed)
254: from solar data (left) and solar \& KamLAND measurements (right).
255: The solar data includes the SNO salt-phase measurements. Overlaid
256: are the corresponding regions reported by the SNO collaboration
257: (light gray and dotted contours) with a weaker $\dmsq$ limit.
258: The functions at the top and to the right of each panel are the
259: mariginalized $\Delta\chi^2$ functions.}
260: \label{fig:osc}
261: \end{figure}
262:
263: \begin{thebibliography}{9}
264: \bibitem{solar} B.T.Cleveland et al., \Journal{\APJ}{496}{505}{1998};
265: V.Gavrin, {\it reported at this conference};
266: E.Bellotti, {\it reported at this conference};
267: S.Fukuda et al., \Journal{\PRL}{86}{5651}{2001};
268: S.Fukuda et al., \Journal{\PRL}{86}{5656}{2001};
269: Q.R.Ahmad et al., {\it nucl-ex/0309004};
270: Q.R.Ahmad et al., \Journal{\PRL}{89}{011302}{2002}.
271: \bibitem{global}S.Fukuda et al., \Journal{\PLB}{539}{179}{2002}.
272: \bibitem{kl} K.Eguchi et al., \Journal{\PRL}{90}{021802}{2003}.
273: \bibitem{MSW} S.P.Mikheyev and A.Y.Smirnov, \Journal{\SNP}{42}{913}{1985};
274: L.Wolfenstein, \Journal{\PRD}{17}{2369}{1978}.
275: \bibitem{skdn} M.B.Smy et al., {\it hep-ex/0309011}.
276: \bibitem{skdet} S.Fukuda et al., \Journal{\NIMA}{501}{418}{2003}.
277: \bibitem{BP2000} A.Junghans et al.,{\it nucl-ex/0308003};J.Bahcall et al.,
278: \Journal{\APJ}{555}{990}{2001}.
279: \bibitem{ianni} A.Ianni, \Journal{J. of Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.}{29}{2107}{2003}.
280: \end{thebibliography}
281:
282: \end{document}
283: