1: \subsection{Neutralino searches}
2: \label{sec:ananeu}
3:
4: \newcommand{\mc}{\multicolumn}
5:
6: The neutralino searches were designed to cover both
7: $\XN{k} \XN{1}$ production
8: with $\XN{k} \to \XN{1} + \ffbar$,
9: with a signature of acoplanar jets or leptons, and channels of
10: the type \XN{k}\XN{j} with $k$ or $j> 2$, which can lead to neutralino
11: cascade decays. To maximise the sensitivity several searches
12: were used, covering different topologies, namely:
13: %KH topologies were searched for
14: %KH This is achieved by using an enlarged set of topological
15: %KH selections.
16: %which give some coverage in a number of SUSY channels.
17: %The full set of selections allows setting a limit on \MXN{1}.
18: %KH The topologies considered were:
19:
20: \begin{itemize}
21: \item a search for acoplanar jet events, as from $\XN{1}\XN{2}$
22: with \XN{2}~$\to$~\XN{1}\qqbar;
23: \item a search for acoplanar lepton events, as from $\XN{1}\XN{2}$
24: with \XN{2}~$\to$~\XN{1}\ee\ or \XN{2}~$\to$~\XN{1}\mumu;
25: \item a search for multijet events, as from $\XN{i}\XN{j},i=1,2,j=3,4$
26: with \XN{j}~$\to$~\XN{2}\qqbar\ and \XN{2}~ decaying to \XN{1}\qqbar\ or
27: \XN{1}$\gamma$;
28: \item a search for multilepton events for the corresponding decays to
29: lepton pairs;
30: \item a search for cascade decays with tau leptons, e.g.
31: \XN{2}\XN{1} production with \XN{2}~$\to$~\stau$\tau$ and
32: \stau~$\to$~\XN{1}$\tau$;
33: \item a search for double cascade decays with tau leptons, e.g.
34: \XN{2}\XN{2} production with the same \XN{2} decay chain
35: as above.
36: \end{itemize}
37:
38: The different searches, briefly described below, were designed to be
39: mutually exclusive in order to allow easy combination of the results.
40: Thus events selected in the
41: likelihood-based searches for acoplanar leptons or jets of
42: section \ref{sec:neu_2j2l} were explicitly rejected in the searches
43: described in the subsequent sections.
44: The track selection and the general event preselection described in
45: sections \ref{sec:trksel} and \ref{sec:presel}, respectively, were used.
46: The LUCLUS algorithm with $d_{\mathrm join}=10$~\GeVc\
47: was used for jet clustering in the
48: analyses described below, with the exceptions of the
49: likelihood ratio acoplanar jets/leptons and double tau cascade searches,
50: as explicitly mentioned in the corresponding sections
51: (see section~\ref{sec:id&jet} for details on the jet clustering algorithms).
52:
53: Data collected at
54: centre-of-mass energies between 192 and 208 GeV
55: were analysed, and were combined with previous
56: results \cite{neut189}. In the search for staus in \XN{2}\XN{2} production,
57: all data recorded at centre-of-mass energies between 189 and 208 GeV were
58: analysed.
59:
60:
61: \subsubsection{Acoplanar jets and acoplanar leptons searches}
62: \label{sec:neu_2j2l}
63:
64: As mentioned above, the acoplanar jets and acoplanar
65: leptons topologies are dominant in most of the parameter space.
66: For these cases, a search based on the likelihood ratio method was performed
67: and the sequential cut analyses described in~\cite{neut189} were used as a cross-check.
68:
69: The characteristics of the neutralino decays are mainly determined by
70: the value of \DM, here defined as the mass difference
71: between the heavier of the produced neutralinos and the
72: LSP (\XN{1}).
73: The total energy of the visible final state particles, \Evis, was used
74: to distinguish between regions of different signal and background
75: characteristics in the optimisation of the selections.
76:
77: \vspace{0.35cm}
78: \noindent
79: \underline{Likelihood Ratio analysis}
80:
81: %Earlier versions of this search at lower energies have been described
82: %in~\cite{chaneut}.
83:
84: The first step of the analysis was to preselect the events dividing them into
85: three mutually exclusive topologies: ee, $\mu\mu$, and \qqbar.
86: The ee and $\mu\mu$ topologies were defined as having exactly two isolated
87: lepton candidates (see section \ref{sec:id&jet}). In the ee topology, at least one of
88: these had to be a tightly identified electron, and neither
89: identified as a muon. Similarly, the events in the $\mu\mu$
90: topology were required to contain at least one isolated loose muon
91: candidate and no isolated electron.
92: The \qqbar\ topology was defined as events with more than five charged
93: particles and no isolated photons or leptons.
94:
95: In the second step, aimed at removing the dominant SM background processes,
96: events which fulfilled all of the following criteria were selected:
97:
98: \begin{itemize}
99: \item the polar angles of the most energetic neutral and charged particles
100: were required to be above 10\dgree;
101: \item the missing transverse momentum had to exceed 2~\GeVc, or 4~\GeVc\
102: if the visible energy was less than 30~\GeV;
103: \item both the acoplanarity and acollinearity had to be greater than 3\dgree;
104: %\item the event had to not be vetoed by the hermeticity taggers (see section
105: %\ref{sec:id&jet});
106: \item the total visible energy had to be lower than 0.75\sqs.
107: \end{itemize}
108:
109: The first two requirements remove the bulk of the \gamgam\ events and
110: off-momentum beam electrons. The third and fourth reject two-fermion processes.
111: The last requirement removes mainly four-fermion events.
112:
113: In the \qqbar\ topology an additional selection was applied
114: to suppress further the large \qqbar$(\gamma)$
115: background. This was based on the jets reconstructed using the Durham
116: algorithm and forcing the number of jets to two.
117: If the invariant mass of the event was within 40~\GeVcc\ of the
118: Z mass, the acoplanarity of the two jets was required to be at
119: least 10\dgree.
120:
121: %PJKH The numbers of selected events in the different topologies
122: %PJKH at this stage of the analysis are summarised in table
123: %PJKH \ref{tab:neulike_presel}.
124:
125: %PJKH \begin{table}[htb]
126: %PJKH \begin{center}
127: %PJKH {\footnotesize
128: %PJKH \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
129: %PJKH \hline
130: %PJKH \mc{6}{|c|}{Preselection Level} \\
131: %PJKH \hline
132: %PJKH
133: %PJKH \mc{2}{|c|}{\qqbar} & \mc{2}{c|}{ee}
134: %PJKH & \mc{2}{c|}{$\mu\mu$} \\
135: %PJKH
136: %PJKH \hline
137: %PJKH
138: %PJKH Data & MC & Data & MC & Data & MC \\
139: %PJKH \hline
140: %PJKH
141: %PJKH 3049 & 2950$\pm$11 & 146 & 162 $\pm$ 4 & 377 & 402 $\pm$5 \\
142: %PJKH \hline
143: %PJKH \end{tabular}
144: %PJKH }
145: %PJKH \caption{\small
146: %PJKH Selected events in real and simulated data at preselection level
147: %PJKH in the neutralino search for the \qqbar, ee, and $\mu\mu$ topologies}
148: %PJKH \label{tab:neulike_presel}
149: %PJKH \end{center}
150: %PJKH \end{table}
151:
152: For different values of visible energy \Evis\ (typical of different values of \DM),
153: the kinematic properties of the signal were studied
154: in terms of the mean value and standard deviation of several event variables.
155: Five
156: %PJKH visible mass
157: \Evis\
158: regions were defined, each containing
159: signal events with similar properties and SM background composition.
160: These regions are
161: given in table \ref{tab:neulike_dm}, together with the corresponding
162: dominant SM background.
163:
164: \begin{table}[ht]
165: \begin{center}
166: %PJ?{\footnotesize
167: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|}
168: \hline
169: \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{\Evis\ regions} & Main SM bkg.\\
170: \hline
171: \hline
172: 1 & 5$\leq$\Evis $<$ 20~\GeVcc & \gamgam\ \\
173: \hline
174: 2 & 20$\leq$\Evis $<$ 50~\GeVcc & \gamgam, 2-fermions \\
175: \hline
176: 3 & 50$\leq$\Evis $<$ 70~\GeVcc & 2-fermions\\
177: \hline
178: 4 & 70$\leq$\Evis $<$ 110~\GeVcc & 2- and 4-fermions\\
179: \hline
180: 5 & 110~\GeVcc$\leq$\Evis & 4-fermions\\
181: \hline
182: \end{tabular}
183: %}
184: \caption[.]{
185: \label{tab:neulike_dm}
186: Definition of the visible energy regions of the neutralino search in the acoplanar leptons and jets
187: topologies
188: and corresponding dominant SM backgrounds.}
189: \end{center}
190: \end{table}
191:
192: In the last step of the analysis, for each of the 15 windows
193: (three topologies, five \Evis\ regions) thus defined, a likelihood ratio
194: function was computed. The variables used in the likelihood definition
195: are listed below:
196: \begin{itemize}
197: \item global variables (all topologies):
198: visible energy, transverse energy,
199: missing momentum, energy and direction of the most energetic charged and
200: neutral particles, transverse momentum with respect to the thrust axis,
201: polar angle of the missing momentum, thrust value, thrust direction and
202: acoplanarity;
203: \item variables specific to the \qqbar\ topology: jet directions, energies,
204: widths, invariant mass and $y_{\rm cut}$ value;
205: \item variable specific to the ee and $\mu\mu$ topologies, namely
206: the invariant mass of the two charged particles.
207: \end{itemize}
208:
209: For each variable used in the likelihood ratio function, the one-dimensional probability
210: density function was defined according to the procedure described in
211: sections \ref{subsubsec:analysistech} and \ref{sub:CHASEL}, and
212: events with $\mathcal{L}_{R}>\mathcal{L}_{R_{CUT}}$ were selected as
213: candidate signal events.
214: %KH As in the chargino analysis, the value of
215: %KH $\mathcal{L}_{R_{CUT}}$ was defined
216: %KH in order to minimise the excluded cross-section expected in
217: %KH the absence of a signal (at 95\%\ confidence level).
218: %KH (avoid repetition)
219:
220: Some event variable distributions for real and simulated data
221: before the likelihood selection are shown
222: in figure~\ref{fig:neulike_datamc}.
223: %The signal distribution is shown for illustration purposes, as
224: %it contains the contribution of all the generated mass combinations
225: %and is arbitrarily normalised. The exact neutralino cross-section values
226: %and mass differences depend on the point of the parameter space.
227: A fair agreement between data and the SM expectation is found.
228: A low visible energy event is present in the ee topology (see figure~\ref{fig:neulike_datamc}(d)),
229: in a region where low but non-zero background was expected from the
230: SM (about 0.5 events with visible energy below 30 GeV expected from four-fermion processes).
231: %The SM expectation is about 0.05 events in that particular bin and
232: %close to 0.5 events for visible energies below 30 GeV.
233: No significant disagreement between data and MC is
234: found in any of the topologies.
235:
236: %The visible energy of the events passing
237: %this selection is also shown for each topology.
238:
239: \vspace{0.35cm}
240: \noindent
241: \underline{Sequential analysis}
242:
243: The detailed selection criteria for the selection based on sequential
244: cuts are given in reference \cite{neut189} and have not been changed.
245: This analysis was used as a cross-check of the likelihood ratio
246: results.
247: %KH They are only very briefly described below.
248: %KH In reference \cite{neut189} comparisons
249: %KH between the real and the simulated data were presented for three
250: %KH selection stages:
251: %KH {\bf preselection}, {\bf intermediate}
252: %KH selection and {\bf final} selection. The same selection
253: %KH stages are used in the figures and tables of the present note.
254: %KH Jets were reconstructed using the LUCLUS algorithm with
255: %KH $d_{\mathrm join}\!=\!10~\GeVc$ (see section~\ref{sec:analysis})
256: At the final selection level,
257: criteria optimised for different
258: \DM\ regions were designed. They were used as independent
259: selections in the derivation of the results.
260:
261: %KH In the {\bf acoplanar jet} search, the {\bf preselection} aimed
262: %KH at selecting well reconstructed high multiplicity
263: %KH events while rejecting the two-photon background which is characterised
264: %KH by a low transverse missing momentum and a large amount of energy in the
265: %KH forward region of the detector. Events with two jets were selected.
266: %KH The {\bf intermediate} selection level consisted of criteria to
267: %KH reject events with radiative return to the \Zn\ and \WW\ background, by rejecting
268: %KH events with isolated photons or leptons, respectively.
269:
270: %KH In the {\bf acoplanar lepton search}, at the {\bf preselection} level,
271: %KH well reconstructed low multiplicity events were required and Bhabha events
272: %KH were rejected by imposing acoplanarity requirements.
273: %KH Two-photon background was rejected at the {\bf intermediate} selection level,
274: %KH while at the {\bf final} selection level lepton identification was performed, and
275: %KH criteria for the rejection of radiative return and \WW\ backgrounds applied.
276: %KH The leptonic decays
277: %KH of W pairs were suppressed by exploiting charge asymmetry,
278: %KH requiring the product of the charge and the cosine of the
279: %KH polar angle to be negative for
280: %KH both particles in events with a missing momentum above 45~\GeVc.
281:
282: %PJ Moved and changed to results section
283: %PJThe numbers of events selected at the final step of the analysis at the
284: %PJvarious centre-of-mass energies for acoplanar leptons and acoplanar
285: %PJjets are listed in table \ref{tab:neu_JJLLEVENTS}.
286: %PJ
287: %PJThe results of the sequential and likelihood ratio analyses were found
288: %PJto be comparable. The sequential analysis was less performant
289: %PJin the acoplanar jet search for large \DM\ values, whereas their
290: %PJresults were very similar in the acoplanar lepton channels and in
291: %PJthe low \DM\ region in general.
292: %PJ
293: %PJ\begin{table}[htb]
294: %PJ\begin{center}
295: %PJ%%\vspace{-0.8cm}
296: %PJ%%\hspace{-1.5cm}
297: %PJ%{\footnotesize
298: %PJ\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
299: %PJ
300: %PJ\hline
301: %PJ\sqs &
302: %PJ\mc{2}{c|}{low \DM} & \mc{2}{c|}{medium \DM} & \mc{2}{c|}{high \DM} \\
303: %PJ
304: %PJ\cline{2-7}
305: %PJ
306: %PJ(GeV) & Data & MC & Data & MC & Data & MC \\
307: %PJ
308: %PJ\hline
309: %PJ
310: %PJ\mc{7}{|c|}{ee selection} \\
311: %PJ\hline
312: %PJ
313: %PJ192 & 0 & 0.3 $\pm$0.02 & 0 & 0.9 $\pm$0.07 & 0 & 1.3 $\pm$0.09 \\
314: %PJ196 & 0 & 1.0 $\pm$0.07 & 5 & 3.2 $\pm$0.2 & 6 & 3.5 $\pm$0.2 \\
315: %PJ200 & 1 & 1.3 $\pm$0.1 & 3 & 3.8 $\pm$0.3 & 2 & 4.3 $\pm$0.3 \\
316: %PJ202 & 1 & 0.6 $\pm$0.05 & 4 & 1.7 $\pm$0.1 & 1 & 1.9 $\pm$0.1 \\
317: %PJ205 & 0 & 0.8 $\pm$0.02 & 2 & 2.3 $\pm$0.07 & 3 & 3.2 $\pm$0.09 \\
318: %PJ207 & 1 & 1.2 $\pm$0.2 & 3 & 3.3 $\pm$0.5 & 2 & 3.0 $\pm$0.4 \\
319: %PJ208 & 0 & 0.1 $\pm$0.02 & 1 & 0.3 $\pm$0.05 & 1 & 0.3 $\pm$0.04 \\
320: %PJ206.5(*) & 1 & 0.6 $\pm$0.05 & 3 & 2.0 $\pm$0.2 & 2 & 2.0 $\pm$0.2 \\
321: %PJ
322: %PJ\hline
323: %PJ
324: %PJAll & 4 & 5.9 $\pm$0.3 & 21 & 17.5 $\pm$0.7 & 17 & 19.5 $\pm$0.6 \\
325: %PJ
326: %PJ\hline
327: %PJ
328: %PJ\mc{7}{|c|}{$\mu\mu$ selection}
329: %PJ\\
330: %PJ\hline
331: %PJ
332: %PJ%KH (GeV) &
333: %PJ%KH \mc{2}{c|}{low \DM} & \mc{2}{c|}{med \DM} & \mc{2}{c|}{hig \DM} \\
334: %PJ
335: %PJ%KH \cline{2-7}
336: %PJ
337: %PJ%KH & Data & MC & Data & MC & Data & MC \\
338: %PJ
339: %PJ192 & 0 & 0.1 $\pm$0.01 & 1 & 0.6 $\pm$0.04 & 2 & 1.0 $\pm$0.07 \\
340: %PJ196 & 0 & 0.3 $\pm$0.02 & 1 & 1.6 $\pm$0.1 & 3 & 2.8 $\pm$0.2 \\
341: %PJ200 & 0 & 0.5 $\pm$0.03 & 0 & 1.6 $\pm$0.1 & 1 & 2.9 $\pm$0.2 \\
342: %PJ202 & 0 & 0.2 $\pm$0.01 & 1 & 0.8 $\pm$0.06 & 1 & 1.4 $\pm$0.1 \\
343: %PJ205 & 1 & 0.4 $\pm$0.01 & 1 & 1.4 $\pm$0.04 & 3 & 2.8 $\pm$0.08 \\
344: %PJ207 & 1 & 0.4 $\pm$0.05 & 0 & 2.3 $\pm$0.3 & 2 & 2.7 $\pm$0.4 \\
345: %PJ208 & 1 & 0.03 $\pm$0.005 & 0 & 0.2 $\pm$0.03 & 0 & 0.2 $\pm$0.03 \\
346: %PJ206.5(*) & 0 & 0.3 $\pm$0.03 & 2 & 1.3 $\pm$0.1 & 1 & 1.9 $\pm$0.2 \\
347: %PJ
348: %PJ\hline
349: %PJAll & 3 & 2.23 $\pm$0.07 & 6 & 9.8 $\pm$0.4 & 13 & 15.7 $\pm$0.6 \\
350: %PJ
351: %PJ\hline
352: %PJ\mc{7}{|c|}{ qq selection}
353: %PJ\\
354: %PJ\hline
355: %PJ
356: %PJ%KH (GeV) &
357: %PJ%KH \mc{2}{c|}{low \DM} & \mc{2}{c|}{med \DM} & \mc{2}{c|}{hig \DM} \\
358: %PJ
359: %PJ%KH \cline{2-7}
360: %PJ
361: %PJ%KH & Data & MC & Data & MC & Data & MC \\
362: %PJ
363: %PJ192 & 0 & 0.2 $\pm$0.01 & 1 & 1.2 $\pm$0.07 & 0 & 2.0 $\pm$0.1 \\
364: %PJ196 & 0 & 0.7 $\pm$0.02 & 5 & 3.7 $\pm$0.1 & 4 & 5.9 $\pm$0.2 \\
365: %PJ200 & 0 & 0.8 $\pm$0.03 & 2 & 4.3 $\pm$0.1 & 4 & 6.6 $\pm$0.2 \\
366: %PJ202 & 0 & 0.4 $\pm$0.01 & 3 & 2.4 $\pm$0.08 & 2 & 2.7 $\pm$0.09 \\
367: %PJ205 & 0 & 1.1 $\pm$0.3 & 3 & 5.3 $\pm$1.3 & 4 & 5.2 $\pm$1.2 \\
368: %PJ207 & 1 & 1.0 $\pm$0.04 & 6 & 5.3 $\pm$0.2 & 5 & 4.7 $\pm$0.2 \\
369: %PJ208 & 0 & 0.1 $\pm$0.01 & 1 & 0.5 $\pm$0.02 & 3 & 0.4 $\pm$0.01 \\
370: %PJ206.5(*) & 0 & 0.8 $\pm$0.05 & 6 & 3.8 $\pm$0.2 & 4 & 3.6 $\pm$0.2 \\ %PJ
371: %PJ
372: %PJ\hline
373: %PJAll & 1 & 5.1 $\pm$0.3 & 27 & 26.5 $\pm$1.3 & 26 & 31.1 $\pm$1.6 \\
374: %PJ\hline
375: %PJ
376: %PJ
377: %PJ\end{tabular}
378: %PJ%}
379: %PJ\caption{\small
380: %PJResults of the acoplanar lepton and acoplanar jet sequential searches at the%PJ final
381: %PJselection level for the different flavours, \DM\ regions and
382: %PJcentre-of-mass energies. The number of events selected in data and
383: %PJexpected from the SM simulation are given. Simulation errors are statistical%PJ.
384: %PJ(*) indicates the 2000 data taken with the sector 6 of the TPC off.}
385: %PJ\label{tab:neu_JJLLEVENTS}
386: %PJ\end{center}
387: %PJ\end{table}
388:
389: \subsubsection{Multijet search}
390: \label{sec:neu_mj}
391:
392: The multijet search was optimised for cascade decays of neutralinos with large
393: mass splittings, giving high energy jets. Events with energetic
394: photons, characteristic of the decay \XN{2}~$\to$~\XN{1}$\gamma$,
395: were treated separately.
396: %PJ moved from final level below to here
397: Events with a photon signature were selected on the basis of reconstructed photons
398: with a polar angle above 20\dgree, isolated by more than 20\dgree\ from the nearest charged particle.
399: If there was only one such photon its energy was required to be between 10~GeV
400: and 40~GeV; if more than one photon was present, at least two had to have energy greater than 10 GeV.
401: %PJ
402:
403: This selection was similar to the acoplanar jet selection of the sequential
404: analysis, but required
405: a rather large transverse energy and allowed any number of reconstructed
406: jets. Events selected by the searches for acoplanar leptons or acoplanar
407: jets were explicitly rejected.
408:
409: The detailed selection criteria are similar to the ones described
410: in~\cite{neut189}. Background studies based on data of 1998 and an
411: improved energy-flow reconstruction motivated several changes in
412: the selection procedure. Three selection stages
413: (preselection, intermediate selection and final selection)
414: are defined and used in the figures and tables.
415: %As compared to
416: %\cite{neut189} the preselection, aimed at selecting well reconstructed
417: %hadronic events with significant jet activity, was more selective.
418: In the following, the most important steps of this search are summarised.
419:
420: At preselection level,
421: at least five charged particles (passing the track selection described
422: in section~\ref{sec:trksel}) were required, at least
423: one of them with a transverse momentum exceeding 2.5~\GeVc.
424: The transverse energy of the event had to be greater than 25~GeV, the
425: visible energy was required to be less than 0.65\sqs, and the
426: missing momentum had to be less than 0.4\sqs/$c$.
427: There were several requirements
428: aimed at selecting events with
429: %clear
430: jets which were not dominated by
431: single particles with large reconstructed energy.
432: Figures~\ref{fig:neu_mjet99}(a,b) and \ref{fig:neu_mjet}(a,b) show the
433: distributions of the visible mass divided by the centre-of-mass
434: energy for real data and simulated background events
435: passing the above selection.
436:
437: At the intermediate selection level,
438: radiative return to the \Zn, two-photon, and Bhabha background was reduced by
439: excluding events with
440: a neutral particle whose energy exceeded 60~GeV
441: %or large amounts of energy in the forward region of the detector
442: or with more than
443: 40\%
444: of the visible energy within 30\dgree\ of the beam direction. Also,
445: the transverse momentum had to exceed 6~\GeVc. The total momentum and the
446: most energetic shower in the event were both required not to be close to
447: the beam direction.
448: A comparison of the $c$\pT/$\sqrt{s}$ distributions for real data and simulated background
449: following the above selection is shown in figures~\ref{fig:neu_mjet99}(c,d)
450: and \ref{fig:neu_mjet}(c,d).
451: The excess in data visible in~\ref{fig:neu_mjet99}(c)
452: and~\ref{fig:neu_mjet}(c) was found to be consistent with
453: (low acoplanarity) radiative
454: return to the \Zn\ events with misreconstructed missing momentum.
455: In~\ref{fig:neu_mjet}(c) the excess is larger.
456: %KH This is partially due to the data with TPC sector 6 off, and
457: %KH partially due to the use of non-final TPC distortions corrections
458: %KH and calorimeter calibration files for the year 2000. This region
459: %KH of the phase space is removed by subsequent selection criteria
460: %KH and does not impact on the results of this analysis.
461: The reason for this is that in the year 2000 the missing momentum
462: reconstruction suffered from the problems with sector 6 of the TPC and
463: from the fact that the distortions in the TPC data had not yet been
464: fully corrected for at the time of this analysis. The phase space
465: region in question was removed by criteria imposed later in the
466: selection, and the excess has no impact on the analysis results.
467:
468: At the final level of the selection
469: the acollinearity and scaled acoplanarity
470: (in a forced 2-jet configuration)
471: had to be greater than 30\dgree\ and 10\dgree, respectively.
472: To reject \WW\ background it was required that there be no charged particle with
473: a momentum above 30~\GeVc,
474: %PJ and no isolated leptons of significant energy.
475: and no isolated lepton above 10~\GeVc\, or above 4~\GeVc\ with an isolation angle greater than 20\dgree.
476: %KH momentum of the most
477: %KH isolated electron or muon (if any) be below 10~\GeVc, or below 4~\GeVc\ if the
478: %KH angle between the lepton and the nearest jet was greater than 20\dgree.
479: %PJKH In addition, the mass recoiling against the system of
480: %PJKH visible particles had to be greater 50~\GeVcc.
481:
482: %PJKH new paragraph:
483: For events with a photon signature, the mass recoiling against the
484: visible system was required to exceed 20\% of the centre-of-mass
485: energy and the scalar sum of momenta reconstructed with TPC information
486: had to be less than 60\% of the visible energy.
487:
488: For the complementary sample, without a photon signature, several of the
489: criteria above were made stricter in order to reject \Zn$\gamma$ events.
490: %PJKH In addition, all jets with energy above 20~GeV had to
491: %PJKH have a ratio of energy in charged particles to energy in neutral particles
492: %PJKH which was above 0.15, and no
493: The recoil mass was required to exceed 40\% of \sqs\ and the energy
494: deposited in electromagnetic calorimeters had to be less than 40~GeV.
495: No
496: isolated neutrals with energy greater than
497: %PJKH 40~\GeV
498: 20~GeV
499: were allowed and the average momentum of particles with tracks reconstructed
500: in the TPC had to be less than 4~\GeVc.
501:
502:
503: %PJKH The numbers of events selected at the initial, intermediate and final
504: %PJKH steps of the analysis at the various centre-of-mass energies are given
505: %PJKH in tables~\ref{tab:EVENTS_MJNG} and \ref{tab:EVENTS_MJG} for the multijet
506: %PJKH selection without and with photons respectively.
507: Figures~\ref{fig:neu_mjet99}(e,f) and \ref{fig:neu_mjet}(e,f)
508: %PJKH The lower plots in figure \ref{fig:neu_mjet}
509: show the
510: distribution of the scaled acoplanarity for real and simulated data
511: after final selections, while figures~\ref{fig:neu_mjet}(g,h)
512: show $c$\pT/$\sqrt{s}$ for data with TPC sector 6 on.
513: %at the final selection level.
514: A satisfactory agreement between data and SM simulation is found.
515: Four events are observed while three were expected from SM simulation.
516: %The event present at high acoplanarity values in~\ref{fig:neu_mjet}(f)
517: %is compatible with the SM expectation of about 0.4 events for acoplanarities
518: %above 50\dgree\ (and of 3 events in total).
519:
520:
521: \subsubsection{Multilepton search}
522: \label{sub:neu_ml}
523:
524: The multilepton search is sensitive to cascade decays involving leptons,
525: which can dominate if there are light sleptons.
526: This search was described in~\cite{neut189} and is briefly summarised here.
527: %The selection of~\cite{neut189}
528: %was basically left unchanged.
529:
530: At the preselection level, well reconstructed low multiplicity
531: events with missing energy and missing mass were selected.
532: In particular, the total visible energy including badly reconstructed tracks
533: (not passing the track selection described in section~\ref{sec:trksel})
534: was required to be less than 140~GeV, the number of charged particles
535: was required to be at least two and at most eight, and events with more
536: than four neutral particles were rejected.
537: Figures~\ref{fig:neu_mlxt99}(a) and \ref{fig:neu_mlxt}(a) show a
538: comparison between the visible mass
539: divided by the centre-of-mass energy
540: %PJKH distributions
541: for real and simulated events passing the preselection.
542:
543: The selection at the intermediate level served mainly to
544: reject \Zn$\gamma$, two-photon, and Bhabha events by requiring
545: significant transverse momentum and transverse energy
546: (\pT $>$ 8~\GeVc, \Etvis $>$ 25~GeV).
547: The distributions of $c$\pT/\sqs\ for real and
548: simulated data, following the intermediate selection are compared in
549: %PJKH the middle left plot in
550: figures~\ref{fig:neu_mlxt99}(c) and \ref{fig:neu_mlxt}(c).
551:
552: %KH At the {\bf final} selection level the
553: %KH criteria for events with exactly two isolated well-reconstructed
554: %KH charged particles differed from those for events with two
555: %KH reconstructed jets.
556: %KH For events with two charged particles additional rejection of
557: %KH Bhabha events was performed, and W pairs decaying leptonically were
558: %KH removed using charge asymmetry. Events with two jets were rejected
559: %KH if the scaled acoplanarity was less than 15\dgree.
560: %KH The lower left plot in figure~\ref{fig:neu_mlxt}
561: %KH shows the acoplanarity distributions for
562: %KH real and simulated data at the final selection level.
563:
564: At the final selection level events with two or more
565: charged particles were subjected to criteria
566: designed to reject Bhabha events. In addition, the charge asymmetry for
567: the two most energetic such particles was used to reject W pairs
568: decaying leptonically. Events with four or more tracks were
569: clustered into jets, and those with exactly two
570: jets were rejected if their scaled acoplanarity
571: was less than 15\dgree.
572: Figures~\ref{fig:neu_mlxt99}(e) and \ref{fig:neu_mlxt}(e) show
573: the acoplanarity distribution for real and simulated data at this
574: level.
575:
576: \subsubsection{Asymmetric tau cascade search}
577: \label{sec:neu_xt}
578:
579: The tau cascade search is sensitive to \XN{1}\XN{2} production
580: with $\XN{2}\! \to\! \stau\tau$ and $\stau\! \to\! \XN{1}\tau$,
581: where the second $\tau$ produced has very low energy.
582: This search
583: was described in~\cite{neut189} and is briefly summarised
584: here.
585: %PJKH A dedicated search for tau cascades in \XN{2}\XN{2} production
586: %PJKH is described in section~\ref{sec:stauana}.
587:
588: At the preselection level,
589: well reconstructed low multiplicity events with missing energy
590: and missing mass were selected.
591: The selection was the same as for the multilepton
592: search (section \ref{sub:neu_ml}), with the additional
593: requirement of no more than two reconstructed jets.
594: At least two of the charged particles had also
595: to satisfy stricter criteria on reconstruction and impact parameters.
596: The distributions of the visible mass divided by the centre-of-mass energy
597: for real and simulated data at this
598: level are shown in
599: %PJKH figure \ref{fig:neu_mlxt} (upper right plot).
600: figures~\ref{fig:neu_mlxt99}(b) and \ref{fig:neu_mlxt}(b).
601:
602: %KH The intermediate selection level dealt mainly with the
603: %KH rejection of \Zn$\gamma$, two-photon, and Bhabha background.
604: At the intermediate selection level,
605: the highest and second highest momenta of charged particles
606: were required to be below
607: 40~\GeVc\ and 25~\GeVc, respectively, and at least one charged particle had to
608: have a transverse momentum above 2.5~\GeVc.
609: %KH Events with neutral showers above 300~MeV
610: %KH within 20\dgree\ of the beam axis were rejected.
611: The criteria to reject \Zn$\gamma$, two-photon, and Bhabha events were
612: similar to those used in the multilepton search,
613: except for
614: %KH the minimum transverse momentum which was reduced from
615: %KH 8~\GeVc to to 7~\GeVc, and
616: the removal of the requirement on the transverse energy.
617: Figures~\ref{fig:neu_mlxt99}(d) and \ref{fig:neu_mlxt}(d) show
618: %PJKH Figure \ref{fig:neu_mlxt} (middle right plot) shows
619: the distributions of
620: $c$\pT/\sqs\ for real and simulated data at the
621: intermediate selection level.
622:
623: At the final selection level,
624: events with
625: % PJ exactly two isolated, oppositely
626: two or more isolated
627: charged particles were required to have acollinearity and acoplanarity
628: above 60\dgree. The smaller of the two momenta
629: had to be below 70\% of the greater one, and below 10~\GeVc.
630: For events with two reconstructed jets the scaled acoplanarity
631: was required to be greater than 20\dgree, and the acoplanarity and
632: the acollinearity greater than 60\dgree.
633: The acoplanarity distributions for the resulting
634: samples of real and simulated data events are shown in
635: %PJKH figure~\ref{fig:neu_mlxt} (lower right plot).
636: figures~\ref{fig:neu_mlxt99}(f) and \ref{fig:neu_mlxt}(f).
637: %PJKH , and the numbers of events
638: %PJKH selected at the different selection levels are given in
639: %PJKH table~\ref{tab:EVENTS_XT}.
640:
641: \subsubsection{Double tau cascade search}
642: \label{sec:neu_xtxt}
643:
644: The final state of \XN{2}\XN{2} $\to$ $\stau \tau \stau \tau$
645: differs from that of stau pair-production only in the presence
646: of two soft taus from the stau decays.
647: The search criteria for stau pairs (see section~\ref{sec:stauana}) could
648: therefore be applied with slight modifications, as follows.
649: Instead of exactly two $\tau$-candidates, at least three were
650: required, but the momentum of the third most energetic
651: one had to be less than 4\% of the beam momentum.
652: The maximum number of tracks in the event was increased from
653: seven to eight, and, as the \WW\ background is negligible, the
654: requirement on $p^{\rm JET}_{high}$ versus $\theta_{W^+}$ was removed.
655: Since the only SM processes yielding final states with four taus
656: are \ZZ, $\ZZ^*$ or $\Zn\gamma^*$,
657: the invariant mass of the two most energetic
658: $\tau$-candidates was required to be below 40 \GeVcc,
659: $i.e.$ well below \MZ.
660: Variables specific
661: to the two-jet topology,
662: e.g. acoplanarity, were evaluated
663: using the two most energetic $\tau$ candidates only, and
664: the remaining requirements of the stau pair search were left unchanged.
665: In the cases where these requirements differed for high and low \DM,
666: the less stringent selection was applied here.
667: %The results of this search are given in table~\ref{tab:EVENTS_XXTT}.
668:
669:
670: %ReditKH
671:
672:
673:
674:
675:
676:
677:
678:
679:
680:
681:
682:
683:
684:
685:
686:
687:
688:
689:
690:
691:
692:
693:
694:
695:
696: